I think they should add a bonus rule like if you stop the machine on the exact amount that's in the machine you get a small bonus of $2,000 or something like that. Or if you hit three machines on the exact amount then you get a bonus 11th machine.
I kind of had mixed feelings about this show. On one hand it's got great tension with it's huge risk/reward aspect, but on the other hand, it feels too much like Post-Season 2 "Deal or no deal" with it's tone, entirely luck-orientated format and the emotionally exposed players and their sentimental reasons for wanting to win money. Plus the fact that they need to give some weird explanation as to why they've picked a colour seems a bit ridiculous
I need more subs Online Well, in my opinion you don’t need to put “I need more subs” as your name. No big/worthwhile youtuber needs to do that. Allow your content to speak for itself. I’m sure the creators you watch and enjoy didn’t grab your attention due to their name. I know you didn’t ask, but it’s just my two cents. We’re all struggling financially right now, so good luck, bud. Wish you the best.
The fundamental flaw in this game is that the higher the goal is, the harder it gets to reach it, and the contestant has no real control over that since they randomly choose what their goal is. The solution would have been to give the contestant 10 machines to build a bank of as much money as possible, and then offer either a cash buyout of ~35% of the bank or picking one last machine. The 10 remaining machines are then ranked based on how much cash is inside to pay out 50-100% of the bank (four machines pay 0), and the contestant chooses their last machine and takes home the percentage listed.
both of the games was lost. 21:19 - lost due to the high target and became impossible to reach goal amount 40:23 - lost due to out of machines and got unlucky on the lower numbers on last two!
I wish the link would have worked, because I think this would be fun to play online. I am taking coding, so I would have to see if I could figure out how to code this game, of course it would be only for entertainment purposes and no real money would be given.
The game itself is very tense but repetitive, very entertaining. But I hate the presentation and the tone, especially the constant emphasis on the stress aspect
I remember Harry Hill distinctly mocking "the most stressful show on TV" as a slogan.
th-cam.com/video/UyLdIXBBrAg/w-d-xo.html
Please has just become my Least Favorite word...
I think they should add a bonus rule like if you stop the machine on the exact amount that's in the machine you get a small bonus of $2,000 or something like that. Or if you hit three machines on the exact amount then you get a bonus 11th machine.
I kind of had mixed feelings about this show. On one hand it's got great tension with it's huge risk/reward aspect, but on the other hand, it feels too much like Post-Season 2 "Deal or no deal" with it's tone, entirely luck-orientated format and the emotionally exposed players and their sentimental reasons for wanting to win money. Plus the fact that they need to give some weird explanation as to why they've picked a colour seems a bit ridiculous
It was exactly trying to copy American Deal or No Deal.
Aside from the constant "please! please! please!", her *constant* crying is the most irritating thing.
@Esperanza Tamayo Deal or no deal was broadcast in the UK first before it was in the US, it's an Endemol format who are Dutch not American
@miranda👽 Are you an alien?
I need more subs Online Hell yeah. Do you really need more subs online, or does offline work as well?
I have no idea why I put online there but i’m really poor thats why I have to do this
I need more subs Online Well, in my opinion you don’t need to put “I need more subs” as your name. No big/worthwhile youtuber needs to do that. Allow your content to speak for itself. I’m sure the creators you watch and enjoy didn’t grab your attention due to their name. I know you didn’t ask, but it’s just my two cents. We’re all struggling financially right now, so good luck, bud. Wish you the best.
The fundamental flaw in this game is that the higher the goal is, the harder it gets to reach it, and the contestant has no real control over that since they randomly choose what their goal is. The solution would have been to give the contestant 10 machines to build a bank of as much money as possible, and then offer either a cash buyout of ~35% of the bank or picking one last machine. The 10 remaining machines are then ranked based on how much cash is inside to pay out 50-100% of the bank (four machines pay 0), and the contestant chooses their last machine and takes home the percentage listed.
Their smiles are genious only when their eyes see money.
A shot for everytime the woman says please
Exactly like The Bong Game from Capital FM. Which is probably why they asked Chris Tarrant to do this
Colour of money best show ever made
@@ljafrain Pretty sure that's Gordon Ramsay's Bank Balance
this is basically Deal or No Deal but with coloured machines instead of boxes
and with the added pressure of you guessing when to stop.
Belterge and no banker to call.
Please don’t tell Noel Edmonds or he’ll sue
Honestly Chris always walked away when he starts the machine I bet he wants to get out of this
He was secretly walking backstage just to get his SALMON
@@davidfearis7335 you just got that off Harry Hill didn't you? I actually wonder if that's fake or real.
Did you miss him he was on the US and uk million in till he moved away to a new game show studio.
They should rerun this on Challenge.
BRING IT BACK TO ITV1 I SAY
They did.
All 7 episodes. What a run.
@@brandonmartin-moore5302 They did?
@@ljafrain They could show the unaired eighth episode. They did so with Hole in the Wall.
When Diane lost it was sad
78,000 pounds is a hard target. I think the show tops out at 80,000 because you have such low odds after that.
The Cash Card on the left (3rd Person) didn't go down correctly
Looks like you can take two of them
both of the games was lost.
21:19 - lost due to the high target and became impossible to reach goal amount
40:23 - lost due to out of machines and got unlucky on the lower numbers on last two!
No winning fireworks!
Upload more of these
This show should lasted at least two years from 2009 to 2010 and Noel Edmonds could have replaced Chris Tarrant as host in 2010
What about David Edwards??? Is he a presenter now
Can't help thinking the blonde eye candy is somewhat superfluous.
#Workpoint
I wish the link would have worked, because I think this would be fun to play online. I am taking coding, so I would have to see if I could figure out how to code this game, of course it would be only for entertainment purposes and no real money would be given.
Stop saying please,please,please,please,please,please its annoying
She is too emotional to be a teacher, in schools you have to be able do deal with a lot of 🤬 for students and other members of staff.
The game itself is very tense but repetitive, very entertaining. But I hate the presentation and the tone, especially the constant emphasis on the stress aspect
STOP! STOP!
We need this show in the US, when ABC axed Duel they should've done this instead of some drama show.
cutemimi25 would suit the us yeah. I know most of the shows over there are simple
Yeah I know.
I can picture Meredith Viera hosting this.
@* * Lame, Please I've seen worse.
3 words...Set For Life
or 6 words...For The Rest Of Your Life
That show is worse than this.
I think this should be combined with the bank job, video Village, Pitfall, and whew, to create Money Runners.
@@henrytube5333 I think Meredith Viera would be the hostess and Drew Carey would be the host
!stop
I never thought a British game show would out-sob-story American TV….
Most American TV Shows/Game Shows are not "Sob Story" based. Especially today.
X Factor
@@hakc97again fancy seeing you here hahaha