Chocked, I think. Note: in fiction, an interceptor aircraft accomplishes something similar to a “zero length takeoff” using staggered chocks such that the aircraft is pointed up at a 10+ degree angle as “full afterburner” is achieved. It climbs the rear chocks first, then as the rear wheel suspension compresses, the front wheel is climbing the slope and the engines get into 105% reheat - four times the weight of the aircraft. The result is a missile-like launch, with the wheels coming up almost immediately as it climbs out at a steep angle. Time to altitude is well under a minute.
I even forgot about this flight I took. I was the pilot, Marvel was the captain and the Metralha brothers were the flight engineers. A short flight, we left the Seychelles islands and landed on 5th Avenue in New York (at night) so as not to arouse suspicion. Great flight.
My parents got to fly on the Concorde - once on British Airways, once on Air France. They met Suzanne Somers, Ray Charles & were kept away from Jackie Kennedy Onassis by her security. I know the Concorde needed an extra-long runway, & the nose was down during takeoff & landing. Also, AF & BA were the only 2 major carriers to fly them; I don’t think any others - charter or otherwise - ever had them painted in any other scheme.
Braniff operated Concord between Dallas and Washington DC for a while. The route was flown by Braniff aircrews and due to noise regulations they could only fly subsonic. They were never painted in Braniff livery as the same aircraft would be flown between Washington DC and Europe by BA or AF crews.
Cute video. I flew the Concorde once, on August 22, 1987 from Amsterdam during a pleasure flight of two hours. Seat 5 on the left. Twice the speed of sound, Mach 2,2. When we returned we also made two fly pasts on the Lelystad Air Show. You can see this on TH-cam ! I can still see myself and my parents fly! The plane was the Air France F-BVFB. Now on display at a German air museum! The most beautiful day of my life.....
Ain't Ai amazing!?!? The wide variety of aircraft taking off from that same airstrip, with the same clouds, the same scenery and the same ocean!!! Truly amazing! And truly unbelievable!
Plane stays in perfect constant view yet gets smaller and the camera angle never has to adjust. The geometry doesn't quite pan out. Stellar attempt though.
You don't need nose droop at that latitude and elevation above sea level. The water vapor from the ocean and the runway height are at the same level causing enough prismatic refraction so the pilots can see beneath the aircraft. It is such a strong refraction that if you noticed you'd see a mirror on the glare shield so they can see up , which is hopefully the direction of flight. Light waves can be funny that way. Also, for very short runways the planes lighten their load by either not taking on chem trail fluid or off loading it if already on board. They also wait until they have a strong tailwind so as to push the plane to take off speed faster.
Have flown transatlantic on Concorde, 1982. If it only accelerated like that , we'd all have been under the Atlantic. Rotation was about 180 knots, lift off going up to 1550mph at 70 000 feet over the Arctic. Decent was very rapid, down to subsonic over Scotland and down to Heathrow, 3hrs 30 after leaving JFK
I actually saw a concord take off from Dulles. We were approximately two miles away. When it throttled up to takeoff power, it was extremely loud even from that distance.
@@WarrenWalter-d7u and that is why in my 30 years of Naval Aviation I was required to wear double hearing protection on the flight deck because the aircraft that they are very loud
It was a passenger plane that could do a full vertical acceleration. It was a phenomenal plane, but not practical. It only flew from Europe to the JFK Airport, in New York. It was too noisy, and consumed too much fuel. It was not practical, for passenger flights. I think it could do a Mach 1 , but I'm not sure.
@@ColinCameron-cq3sb It could actually fly just above mach 2 ( top speed ) and you're perfectly right about all the rest... It was also an aging plane built with 1960's technology... Too bad they retired it though...
Concord routinely took off with afterburner, used them again for a minute or so to break the sound barrier, and rarely at any other time. Sim is also messing up, the nose should be DROOPED the entire time the plane is moving around on the ground.
I saw the Concord take off and land at JFK a few times. This was in the late 90s early 2000s. It was very cool to watch. Also saw them parked at a gate.
Yes it can like most jets or any aircraft with reversible thrust, prop or jet Actually with skilled braking and outboard engines, like a DC3, they can be walked backwards.
John Gillette Das ist doch Quatsch. Kein Düsenflugzeug hat einen Rückwärtsgang. Die Schubumkehr ist auch nicht dafür gemacht, sondern er wird für das Bremsen benötigt. Auch ein Flugzeug mit Propeller kann nicht rückwärts fahren. Das hier ist eindeutig ein Fake-Video, zumal es NIE eine solche Concorde gegeben hat. Und das Video ist nicht mal gut gemacht. Beim Starten sieht man im Wasser nicht nicht mal aufgewühltes Wasser, müsste es aber haben von den Triebwerken
Read the disclaimer attached to the video. "This video is created solely for entertainment purposes. The events depicted are fictional and not intended to represent real-life situations. Any resemblance to actual persons or events is purely coincidental. Enjoy the show!"
He's the best! Wish I was on that plane, 40k would clear my past and set me up to pay it forward. Life does not work that way for guys like me😅. Love you man! Always the giver!
Dat is echt mogelijk! Als je geland bent zie je soms kleppen opengaan en de toeren oplopen..dan wordt de snelheid eruit gehaald door de straal om te keren. Daar kan je ook mee achteruit...igv brand in een gate ofzo.
You should get out more, Some prop driven planes can back up on a level surface. Military C-130’s frequently back up out of their revetments or hard stands that they parked nose in. B-727’s and Dc-‘s/ MD-80 or 90’ can back up using thrust reversers. There are probably more I can’t think of. But the Concord cannot ..
CGI I am so glad that you are sharing this as a representation of what you might believe… Especially when you don’t say where it is… And considering the only thing missing in your graphic is, where would the Concorde refuel?
Great 👍 but the real Concord can't do that, because even though it's really powerful, it's also a passenger plane. It's really heavy, so it wouldn't be able to produce enough lift in that short of distance with a Delta wing. It would have to reach well over 200 miles per hour. It's made to fly really fast so it creates less lift at lower speeds.
Concordes were deactivated in the early 2000s, after the Air France terrible accident. And they were owned only by Air France and British Airways. This seems to be a Microsoft Flight Simulator footage.
That pilot pulled off a 3-point turn better than I ever did in my car. Well done.
Unbelievable take-off. I thought he was going in the water. Must be be an exceptional pilot.
Amazing, the afterburners don't even disturb the water 🫢
Yes, that was amazing, but totally unrealistic.
😅😅😅
Do you know when the last time a Concord plane took off? Seems to me at least 10+ years. Very much CGI. @@terrellgoeke906
Duck
It's got to be fake. It would have disturbed water
The title of this video should be "Concord Taxis down Runway at 5 mph."
‘Ai’mazing 😂😂
😂😂
That plane is amazing it can take off while the wheels are still chalked.
‘Chalked’ huh? Ok
That was the first thing I noticed! Too damned funny!😅
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Chocked, I think.
Note: in fiction, an interceptor aircraft accomplishes something similar to a “zero length takeoff” using staggered chocks such that the aircraft is pointed up at a 10+ degree angle as “full afterburner” is achieved.
It climbs the rear chocks first, then as the rear wheel suspension compresses, the front wheel is climbing the slope and the engines get into 105% reheat - four times the weight of the aircraft. The result is a missile-like launch, with the wheels coming up almost immediately as it climbs out at a steep angle.
Time to altitude is well under a minute.
Thunderbirds😂
I even forgot about this flight I took. I was the pilot, Marvel was the captain and the Metralha brothers were the flight engineers. A short flight, we left the Seychelles islands and landed on 5th Avenue in New York (at night) so as not to arouse suspicion. Great flight.
Maybe time to get down to the doc and check out your dementia.
À poor fake video.
or just quit 🍹 ng the acid
I thought this was real at first .
Until I seen it turning around and backing up like it was a Volkswagen beetle .
🤪
Yes you think it's real for a moment till you then see it's a cartoon......that's all folks😊
If only! 😂
No way an aircraft that size takes off on a runway that short.
Good
Or my Dodge Journey.
It even has reverse. It's entertaining.
😂😂😂😂❤❤❤😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yeah, I'm no aviation expert but I'm not exactly sure how the Concorde does a 3 point turn.
Most jets can reverse. O spent a lot of years working with 727s, and they could backup.
@@ss0528it was in the video didn't you see it ? Lol and no kidding
That was the giveaway. It didn't beep when backing up.
Hm rocks mysteriously dissappers🤔 at 1:00 almost got me 😂
Went back and looked...the rocks disappearing is hilarious! Thanks for pointing that out.
Then I noticed the black, afterburner plumes appearing and disappearing...finally, the plane disappears at the end. Poof!
You don’t have to be a pilot to see this is not real . Cool nevertheless
Your right...pretty obvious...
Nice graphics. Well done
The shape of the Concorde was so cool. Bring it back!
I saw concord in the 90s in Reno Nevada
It landed and took off several times on 11000 foot runaway
Cool to see!
My parents got to fly on the Concorde - once on British Airways, once on Air France. They met Suzanne Somers, Ray Charles & were kept away from Jackie Kennedy Onassis by her security.
I know the Concorde needed an extra-long runway, & the nose was down during takeoff & landing. Also, AF & BA were the only 2 major carriers to fly them; I don’t think any others - charter or otherwise - ever had them painted in any other scheme.
Singapore Airlines leased a few.
Russia also
It was built by an AF:BA consortium
Braniff operated Concord between Dallas and Washington DC for a while. The route was flown by Braniff aircrews and due to noise regulations they could only fly subsonic. They were never painted in Braniff livery as the same aircraft would be flown between Washington DC and Europe by BA or AF crews.
Cute video. I flew the Concorde once, on August 22, 1987 from Amsterdam during a pleasure flight of two hours. Seat 5 on the left. Twice the speed of sound, Mach 2,2. When we returned we also made two fly pasts on the Lelystad Air Show. You can see this on TH-cam ! I can still see myself and my parents fly! The plane was the Air France F-BVFB. Now on display at a German air museum!
The most beautiful day of my life.....
Klasse endlich mal ein Flugzeug mit Rückwärtsgang
😂😂😂😂😂
Fake of course. Disappointingly amateur. Speed and length of take off laughable
K😮
Sometimes it’s wise to read the Disclaimer first.
@@marcelenkelaar2724 Wah Ha !! Excellent. Well done. Never even noticed the disclaimer.
Who believes this ??????You have to be very ignorant .Everybody knows the concorde isn't flying anymore since years
Just for laughs
Ain't Ai amazing!?!? The wide variety of aircraft taking off from that same airstrip, with the same clouds, the same scenery and the same ocean!!! Truly amazing!
And truly unbelievable!
Planes don't have reverse 😅
And the ‘reverse’ …
Amazing take off... But how did it land???
You got "hearted" by someone obviously too obtuse to recognize your sarcasm!
HILARIOUS
Aircraft can backup by reversing the engines I am a 30-year Aviation professional
Plane stays in perfect constant view yet gets smaller and the camera angle never has to adjust. The geometry doesn't quite pan out. Stellar attempt though.
I like how the droop snoot was up before take off, then went down after it got airborne. 😆
That was one of the most graceful jets I have ever seen.
Appears to be very efficient craft. Such a short runway.
Great job making this loos real. Too valuable of an aircraft to play around with such arsenal.
You forgot the dipping of the nose for taking off and landing.
you are very detailed. Thnaks william
You don't need nose droop at that latitude and elevation above sea level. The water vapor from the ocean and the runway height are at the same level causing enough prismatic refraction so the pilots can see beneath the aircraft. It is such a strong refraction that if you noticed you'd see a mirror on the glare shield so they can see up , which is hopefully the direction of flight. Light waves can be funny that way. Also, for very short runways the planes lighten their load by either not taking on chem trail fluid or off loading it if already on board. They also wait until they have a strong tailwind so as to push the plane to take off speed faster.
That is a cool take-off. How was that possible? That's the craziest takeoff I've ever seen
Ai is cool be how did the plane get there on that short runway
My guess is by AI landing.
It probably came from the submarine in the background
That's what that plane did
THATS ONE SICK TAKE'OFF,
WONDER BOUT THE LANDING,
EVERY INCH COUNTS ,
FLAPS ALL DOWN 90%°
THRUSTERS ALL OFF,
AND SENDING A PRAYER.
👍🏾😁🤳U had me there 4 a minit😂✈🥩
Have flown transatlantic on Concorde, 1982. If it only accelerated like that , we'd all have been under the Atlantic. Rotation was about 180 knots, lift off going up to 1550mph at 70 000 feet over the Arctic. Decent was very rapid, down to subsonic over Scotland and down to Heathrow, 3hrs 30 after leaving JFK
3:10 London to NYC when I flew it in 1988.
A potem mama cie obudzila...
@@JuanManuelRodriguez-lv3vzdo przedszkola w NJ
I actually saw a concord take off from Dulles. We were approximately two miles away. When it throttled up to takeoff power, it was extremely loud even from that distance.
@@WarrenWalter-d7u and that is why in my 30 years of Naval Aviation I was required to wear double hearing protection on the flight deck because the aircraft that they are very loud
@gerald-hl7kt
I can certainly understand that.
It made strong thunder seem very quiet.
I can see the strings!! 😅 1:22 Austin! Turn around!!😂
NOT REAL!
Hats off to the pilot..😮
It's fake, the Concorde Takes ofrece and lands with the nose down.
Well the disclaimer says that the video is fake and it's just for entertainment purposes only duh😂
Very impressive...The Concorde was basically an oversized jet fighter...
It was a passenger plane that could do a full vertical acceleration. It was a phenomenal plane, but not practical. It only flew from Europe to the JFK Airport, in New York. It was too noisy, and consumed too much fuel. It was not practical, for passenger flights. I think it could do a Mach 1 , but I'm not sure.
Max cruising speed was Mach 2.04. Or 2179 km/ hrs. I'm sure that speed breaks the sound barrier.
@@ColinCameron-cq3sb It could actually fly just above mach 2 ( top speed ) and you're perfectly right about all the rest...
It was also an aging plane built with 1960's technology...
Too bad they retired it though...
This one was an oversized figment of the imagination
@@ColinCameron-cq3sbyeah Mach 1 IS the speed barrier (or the speed of sound) or just under 767.3 MPH or 343 m/s in dry air.
Concord routinely took off with afterburner, used them again for a minute or so to break the sound barrier, and rarely at any other time.
Sim is also messing up, the nose should be DROOPED the entire time the plane is moving around on the ground.
Imagine landing on that runway without a catapult and a reverse gear is awesome. Huh.. 😮
I saw the Concord take off and land at JFK a few times. This was in the late 90s early 2000s. It was very cool to watch. Also saw them parked at a gate.
Video game! 4 minutes I'll never get back.
Cool animation Jets do not backup runway too short nevertheless cool
Animation .. planes don’t go backwards.
Actually, some can. Prop jobs mostly, but certainly not the Concorde...
The C17 can as well but not the Concorde
Yes it can like most jets or any aircraft with reversible thrust, prop or jet
Actually with skilled braking and outboard engines, like a DC3, they can be walked backwards.
DC-9/MD-80 can. C-17 also.
John Gillette
Das ist doch Quatsch. Kein Düsenflugzeug hat einen Rückwärtsgang. Die Schubumkehr ist auch nicht dafür gemacht, sondern er wird für das Bremsen benötigt. Auch ein Flugzeug mit Propeller kann nicht rückwärts fahren.
Das hier ist eindeutig ein Fake-Video, zumal es NIE eine solche Concorde gegeben hat.
Und das Video ist nicht mal gut gemacht. Beim Starten sieht man im Wasser nicht nicht mal aufgewühltes Wasser, müsste es aber haben von den Triebwerken
The new concord has reversing capabilities!?!? Must be Elon's work! 😂
With thrust reversers you can back up a jet, but this runway is way way to short.
Fan blades and engines are reversible. On all jets. BS video, just sayin.
Must be CGI. LOVE Conkie
Concorde takes off from a 50 feet runway😂😂😂😂😂
I was originally thinking it was an RC plane until takeoff then realized it was CGI
Read the disclaimer attached to the video. "This video is created solely for entertainment purposes. The events depicted are fictional and not intended to represent real-life situations. Any resemblance to actual persons or events is purely coincidental. Enjoy the show!"
Great video, loved it!
Go go go….!!!!!
Love the drone work for such a long time ago
With such a short distance, the concord can take off. m You've got to be joking or think we're stupid.
He's the best! Wish I was on that plane, 40k would clear my past and set me up to pay it forward. Life does not work that way for guys like me😅.
Love you man! Always the giver!
😄😄😄 the plane moves....but it's shadow doesn't change
CGI is truly impressive
I'm 51 years old and I've never heard of a plane having the ability to back up on their own
Dat is echt mogelijk! Als je geland bent zie je soms kleppen opengaan en de toeren oplopen..dan wordt de snelheid eruit gehaald door de straal om te keren. Daar kan je ook mee achteruit...igv brand in een gate ofzo.
You should get out more, Some prop driven planes can back up on a level surface. Military C-130’s frequently back up out of their revetments or hard stands that they parked nose in. B-727’s and Dc-‘s/ MD-80 or 90’ can back up using thrust reversers. There are probably more I can’t think of. But the Concord cannot ..
Bloody awesome even it is a fake. If you have ever been in a cockpit , flight is living art.
Special effects are wonderful.........
Thank you AI. The bushes don't even move as a supersonic jets engines comes within feet of them 😂😂
How can such a large plane take off on such a short runway? I'm sure it would overshoot on landing.
Nice congratulations 😂 great job God bless 🙌
Amazing😊
"I'll take 'Things that never happened' for $2000, Alex."
I saw the Concorde landing in Ko Phuket / Thailand on that small & short airport ... more than a miracle !!! Vive la France !!!
Man, this artificial plane created by AI is amazing, I was one of the passengers on board, and we arrived from JFK to Shanghai in 30 minutes.
I flew on it too and landed & when I got out I was 30 years younger & it was a TARDIS.
Gros rigolo, concorde n’a pas d’inverseurs de poussée et ill lui faut beaucoup plus de distance pour décoller !
Really, I loved the K turn!!!
Deep fake
🤔 Lo interesante sería verlo aterrizando 😁....
Fake, purê fake...
Concord a real is really beautiful
great fx work........
Ha-ha-ha😂 Good humour😅
I'm sure it ' s not real .
Yeah your right it's Bullshit... Another Click bait...
CGI
I am so glad that you are sharing this as a representation of what you might believe… Especially when you don’t say where it is… And considering the only thing missing in your graphic is, where would the Concorde refuel?
Mindblogging! CONCORDE IS A Stupendous marvel of engineering/technology KUDOS !
@@venkatakrishniahkv-gb6ky Concorde may have been a stupendous piece of engineering but it had nothing to do with this fake video.
@@brianbarcroft9167Indeed. Genuine videos of Concordes taking off are easy enough to find on TH-cam, and are impressive in being ... genuine.
Yep, I sure handled this baby magnificently. Wasn't my runway turnaround a thing of beauty? 👏👏👏
Could have watched Concorde take off and land all day. It was incredible
Wonderful
😮wow what a sleek bird she is, sire😂🎉
After seeing this I can pass on a ride . My nerves stands firm.😂😂
Absolut krank.
Ein Video-Spiel - oder was???
Why did I not realize this is a sim until the actual takeoff
What an attractive craft with many problems.
Gotta Love antiques LOL
This takeoff is part of the definition of COOL!
AND NO RIPPLES IN THE WATER...
I like how the people in the cockpit look like cardboard cutouts! LOL!
that was so smooth...
Absolutely amazing
Great 👍 but the real Concord can't do that, because even though it's really powerful, it's also a passenger plane. It's really heavy, so it wouldn't be able to produce enough lift in that short of distance with a Delta wing. It would have to reach well over 200 miles per hour. It's made to fly really fast so it creates less lift at lower speeds.
Super!!!
Didn't fool me one bit..😂
Really good AI game control
It's nicely done.
Good luck ❤
Wow super cool
Concordes were deactivated in the early 2000s, after the Air France terrible accident. And they were owned only by Air France and British Airways. This seems to be a Microsoft Flight Simulator footage.
For those interested, runway requirement is 11,800 ft/3,596.6 m. Yep!
Beautiful plane
Like watching Thunderbird 2 take off from Tracey Island...
Brilliant graphics, I thought it was real to start with. What is that Microsoft Flight Sim?