Amp Model Comparison between the Nux MG-300 & the Valeton GP-100
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2020
- I thought it might be interesting to compare some of the common amp models between the Nux MG-300 and the Valeton GP-100.
For more information
Nux MG-300
www.nuxefx.com/mg-300.html
Valeton GP-100
www.valeton.net/GP_100.html
0:36 Sound Sample 01 NUX MG-300
0:49 Sound Sample 01 Valeton GP-100
1:01 Sound Sample 02 NUX MG-300
1:24 Sound Sample 02 Valeton GP-100
1:47 Sound Sample 03 NUX MG-300
2:08 Sound Sample 03 Valeton GP-100
2:29 Sound Sample 04 NUX MG-300
2:52 Sound Sample 04 Valeton GP-100
3:16 Sound Sample 05 NUX MG-300
3:28 Sound Sample 05 Valeton GP-100
3:40 Sound Sample 06 NUX MG-300
3:57 Sound Sample 06 Valeton GP-100
4:14 Sound Sample 07 NUX MG-300
4:31 Sound Sample 07 Valeton GP-100
4:48 Sound Sample 08 NUX MG-300
5:02 Sound Sample 08 Valeton GP-100
5:16 Sound Sample 09 NUX MG-300
5:43 Sound Sample 09 Valeton GP-100
6:10 Sound Sample 10 NUX MG-300
6:23 Sound Sample 10 Valeton GP-100
![[TH] VCT Pacific Stage 2 - Playoffs Day 2 // PRX vs GEN | DRX vs TLN](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gmrSk-_ahlA/mqdefault.jpg)
![ชวนน้องลงทุ่ง - เงาะน้อยเพชรบ้านแพง X น้องมายด์ [ Music Video ] Official Saman Music](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bq7Hw9culjE/mqdefault.jpg)
Great comparison. I prefer the nux. The distortion sound of the valeton is more thin than the nux to my ears. The nux is more dark.
Both sound good and with these newer Multieffects units its really easy to dial in the tone you like.
1st sample: Nux MG-300
2nd sample: Valeton GP-100
A comparison between Valeton GP 100 & the Flamma fx 100 would be welcome.
By the way great video man!
I'm mostly interested on the looping function, since my amp has IR's on its own.
Which one would be better for looping purposes??
It probably doesn't matter after all this time, but in case it's relevant to someone watching the video - the AC30 comparison is a bit unfair here, since it's using a different amp/channel for each of the units. MG300 only has the top boost channel of the AC30, so the appropriate counterpart to that on the Valeton would be the Foxy 30TB amp, not the Foxy 30N that is used here. I believe it's the same with the IR comparison video, but here the difference is more pronounced I think.
Thanks for both this and the IR comparison for both, helped me to decide between the two units tremendously (went with the Valeton because of features, and I'm not regretting it so far - even if the Nux has a somewhat better sound, it's not that big of a deal for me, especially if IR's come into the mix).
I’m curious - how has the device held up over two years. Thanks.
@@accentontheoff I'm still reasonably happy with it, but it has to be said that for various reasons, I sadly had little time for guitar the past two years, so not sure how relevant that opinion even is. Also I wouldn't consider myself someone who's constantly struggling to improve their sound via new gear. The most disappointing part of my setup still tend to be my hands ;)
@@Case_ Ah well that’s true for all of us. You should keep at it though. I was mainly worried about the build quality of these devices because even though they’re supposed to be budget they’re slightly pricey for me. Need it / them to work properly for a few years at least.
The nux is more warm and less digital in distortions
The Valeton has a better tone and also better effects. Both are better than any Zoom or Digitech.
Are you serious. That can’t be true.
Hello nice Videos i subd;). Torn between 2 multieffect units One Question: What about nux mg300 compare to the boss gt1??? Tone wise and quality of the effects? A good Rectifier would be nice!
Valeton clarity sound is very clean
Somewhere in the chain with the NUX is giving this cocked wah sound. Some kind of weird filtering I bet could be fixed, maybe in the output settings or something . . .
First sample in each model appears to be missing speaker emulation. Very weak 2.5 khz to 4 khz spectrum on the contrary appears to boost the 400 to 500 Hz spectrum which lends a muddy charachteristic. The second sample for each model is doing much better job. But I see a problem with second processor - fixed order of virtual pedal. Many times the modulation effects sound better before distortion (e.g. few of early Dave Gilmour's tone)
I have them both...Valeton is the best in every way imaginable. Just dial it the tone you like tweaking the EQ and Bass and Trible, sounds more tube like, where as NUX sounds like a flash memory processor. Only down side to Valeton is its pedal bend and picth shift which i find unusable, where as NUX almost replicates the the Digitech whammy and the harmonizer is pretty good and clear. I hope future firmware for Valeton takes care of it,
Thanks for the feedback and for your perspectives on both pedals. 👍🏻
What about the Nux Mg400 ?
Excellent review, thanks!
It's clear both are awesome, but nux made better choices on factory IR for each amp.
On clear modulations it's so closest, but with distortion nux is much better.
Love both. If someone have a valeton could use better IRs, only this is required here
I prefer the Valeton GP-100 to my old ears it has a warmer richer sound!
i think nux isnt making joke about its TSAC. the sound is quite real. for valeton, everything sounds brighter. nux is more warm and nice. but valeton gives more features and tonal options
Adjusting it would make it better
Can you put the nu-x in the valiton metal box??
I want a cheap multi-effects pedal that I can travel with and use in a live jam setting. Is the GP-100 that unit? Leaning hard towards Boss GT-1 but the GP-100 is about 80 Euros less.
Hhmmmm, good question.
Both have Pro’s and Con’s. I think the GP-100 has a metal chassis, so for travel it might be more robust. The Boss GT-1 is made of all plastic.
The GP-100 has the ability to have IR’s loaded on it, while the Boss GT-1 doesn’t.
The Boss GT-1 has the ability to move up and down through patches while still maintaining a foot switch to turn one or more effects in a patch on or off. You can also add an external foot switch to the Boss GT-1, which would give you two more control switch. This could be very handy for playing live. The GP-100 has two foot switches which allow you to move up or down through patches, or you can enable to foot switch to turn off or on effects in a patch, so essential giving you two control switches but then you would need to rotate the large parameter button to change patches.
If you like the sound of the Boss GT-1, I think would lean toward it, as it seems more flexible for playing live.
Good luck
I would suggest the Valeton. My experience of the Boss was that everything sounds very similar after a while. Boss was unable to distinguish between different guitars of HH and SS varieties so lacked subtlety. I got really bored with the Boss. It didn't record well either.
@@stevewhite8997 that's an opinion I haven't heard. I really didn't want to go the Valeton GP-100 route because there's little or no customer support whereas the Boss has tons. For me it has been between the GT-1, the Zoom g3xn, or if I want to shell out a bit more money, the NUX MG-30. Everyone seems to rave over the MG-30 especially with the scenes feature and the additional 2 switch accessary. The G3XN is intriguing because of its multiple footswitches. I could envision having a preset that I can start with a clean chorus, switch to OD and then a harmonizer in the same song. Whatcha think about that?
Fell Clean sound i prefer to v gp 100 🤔
+1 Thanks!
Since the nu-x is the winner,, can you make the valeton sound as good by any means nessasery???
I would say possibly by changing the default impulse responses used. Using new, different or better IR's can make the world of difference.
Congratulations on the video!
Although I think the equalizations were different in practice, I honestly preferred Valeton.
The sounds seemed more organic, they seemed more convincing and reasonable.
But everything in life is a matter of taste, so ...
So you work for valeton we get it.
the second sample in each type sound better
Which one of them is the second one?
@@postoffice146 It's gp-100
Nice video. Would it not be simpler to sample riffs and play them into each pedal to ensure identical playback for comparison?
I used a looper to do exactly as you said.
@@Tone-Quest
Cool. I have one of these on order.
Already have the NUX MG300!!
@@Dave_Vee and which do you like the most ? Nux Mg300 or Valeton Gp100 ?
@Derek Zoo I have both, it changes all the time, they're both very good. Valeton is better built though. Currently back playing around with the Ammoon PockRock !!!
Have you tried these through a guitar amp. Which is better.
I did try them through an amp some but mostly through monitor speakers or a FRFR cab. Between the two, I enjoyed the NUX MG-300 better.
@@Tone-Quest Okay, thanks.
this is the video I was looking for to make a fair comparison. Valeton sounds more "processed" while NUX sounds more"organic" (whoeva it means LOL) For me NUX wins
I prefer the looks for nux however sound wise im split in between... some patches the nux sound compressed some the valetone sounded too digital... Ok nux wins for me too!
It's nothing new I'm getting these tones on a Peavey vyper with the shark engine chip set. Something's just dont change they just get smaller. I'm waiting till I can get one fitted behind my ear 😜
Excellent point 😁
Tough to tell. IR’s could have made all the difference. Is it possible to run either of these into a FX return without cab sim off*?
Totally agree on IR’s could make all the difference. I may try this again but using the same IR’s.
And yes, it is possible to run into the FX return with the cab sim off on both units.
IR + old multi effectors = much better. I think IR is a really important part of making sounds these days
The Nux sounds "deeper" and fat while the GP-100 sounds flat and thin sometimes. There are a few distorted sounds that become too muddy on the Nux, though. The Marshalls and Soldano are better on the GP-100 imho. The cleans I found to be equally good. Hard to hear a difference.
Warmer or more vintage would be a better term than "darker"
The Valeton is a overall better pedal.
lol you dont label which is which, I guess I can search for what the gui is on each
Ooops, my bad. The sounds samples start with the NUX MG-300.
Easy.... Valeton has no microphone opt8with the cabs
Options I meant
I still waiting for NUX MG - 30
IKR, me too
I've checked out various videos of it (as you probably have to by now) and found its sound to be disappointing. The MG300 (or Valeton) wins for me. EDIT: Bought the MG300. Unfortunately I couldn’t get it to sound convincing over my HK Polar 10. Too much sizzle in the crunch and distortion sounds, and the clean sounds didn’t sound too realistic. Probably more the fault of my column speaker, but it just didn’t work for my intended purpose.
@@scottbecker3485 mg30 is miles ahead of mg300, at least on paper.
@@milankotevski1663 Yes, that may be so. I have learned to trust my ears more than paper. ;-) At any rate, I gave up on both Nux devices after trying the one. Instead using 3 other pedals (together much more expensive): an overdrive with Fender-like qualities, a reverb and an IR-based speaker sim. Sounds miles better!
Valeton
I'd you like the Digitech Rp360 you will like the Valeton GP. They are very similar in functionality. A real test for me is whether a fx unit like this can make close to the Gilmour sound. The RP can and the Valeton can: the Nux MG 300 can't. The fx section of modulations and delays is pretty poor. Not saying the Nux is bad, it certainly isn't and it does have it's uses. I have all 3 mentioned units and the one I prefer is the Digitech. It is simply the best all-rounder. Nux needs improvements to get it's modulations and Delays right because that's what let's it down mostly. Valeton has a dissappointing Wah and the drive pedals don't really sound authentic. Both the Valeton and the Nux have very poor noise cancellation and when used they tend to cut notes short which sounds artificial and becomes annoying to the point whereby you don't use it at all. Also with the Nux , the best Marshall sound I have made was using the Crunch box sim into a Fender Amp simulation. Way better than the Marshall amp simulations.
Sorry to anyone who read my previous review here because I have changed my mind on the units after using them over an extended period of time.
I am literally looking at the Valeton as an alternative to the RP360 right now! Thanks for the insight!
@@elemkay5104 Valeton is ok but there are some problems with it that I have found whilst using it. Many fx are disappointing particularly the Wah sound which is rubbish and it doesn't give an authentic Tubescreamer ( very unconvincing). Also the Noise cancellation is terrible. I mean really bad. It's difficult to use because it stops any sustain on notes you play. Very frustrating to use. To be honest I have stopped using the Valeton because of these problems. My advice look for a better unit. It's cheap but nasty.
@@stevewhite8997 Thanks so much for the reply. I actually wouldn't use noise cancellation since I have a very quiet setup, or the distortions. The wah is a little disappointing to hear, but if the modulations, delays, reverbs and amp/cabs are good then it might still be a good fit for me personally. Did you ever use the octave/pitch shifting?
I was about to get gp100 but nux smashed it in this comparisson! Even my zoom g1on sounds better than valeton. Thanks for reviewing them
Ya right da
Anyone who thinks the NuX sounds more "organic" or "amp-like", needs to get a new pair of ears.
The Valeton is newer and, as expected, has more sophisticated software that lets you change the order of the blocks. That alone is priceless.
OK OK OK so the NUX gets a 6.9/10 whilst the Valeton gets a 4.3/10. The latter sounded glassy most of the time thus sounding a lot cheaper than the NUX MG300 although they are the same price.
I like your scoring and descriptions. 👍🏻
Nux mg 300 has more realistic sound than valetone
Would take the Harley Benton for this price. Same as Mooer and easier to handle! 👍😊😜
Do you own the Harley Benton one?
I’ve been tempted to try it.
Is it my imagination or does the Nux have better bass response?
Nux👍
Which one is nux and which one is valenton?
Oops, my bad, it is not overly obvious.
When the sound samples start, the NUX is first.
I appreciate you pointing out my oversight. I went back and added time stamps to help identify which one is which. Thanks again. 👍
Thanks mate for your response, it really helps me 👍👍
Watch the video da
which one better you think?
I tend to lean toward the Nux MG-300 but both are great units, especially for under $150.
Absolutely nux with analog drive and custom ir
@@Tone-Quest is nux sounds better or which area nux is better?
@@SoundFromEast I tend to enjoy the sounds of the Nux MG-300 a little more. I think the amp models are good but I think where it stands out a little more than the Valeton GP-100 is the effects.
@@Tone-Quest the effect from nux is better than valeton right?
Nux🤟
Много компрессии в валетоне
Nux.
Nux mg300 is the winner
Valeton cannot change mic position
Nux cant change pedals position