Excellent point. See my OP. Very Best Regards, Tom Scott Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System _Our American Injustice System_ _Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
The ultimate and very simple proof that it was a conspiration is that 57 years later the case has still not been made fully public due to “identifiable national security, law enforcement, and foreign affairs concerns”. Yet we should believe that it was one crazy guy alone. Allright
Friendly fire ultimately killed him. It’s blatantly obvious. To make that public would be a huge slap in the face to the Secret Service. No conspiracy, just best to leave the file sealed.
Right. Soviet Union is long gone so why is it security concern. We all know why. It will be like the CIA human experiments conspiracy that came to be true. MK Ultra.
He was killed because he did not want to start a war with Cuba! It's a war machine and Eisenhower had talked about the corruption before this happened!
@Christopher Strimbu yes it's either a mistype or he's a bonafide kook. But let's just call it a mistype. To speculate that this person could be a kook is just so ugly.
"Three can keep a secret if two are dead." What if all three are dead? Too much conflicting, excluded, or ignored evidence for this to not have been a conspiracy and cover-up.
Well two are dead. Lee Harvey Oswald was shot and killed by some random dude out of no where. So you can think about that as well and well the CIA can keep a secret they have many.
Oswald did act alone. He drank his Coke all by himself on the 2nd floor of the book depository in the break room while the shooting was going on. Just like he said.
Not only that but how does a FMJ bullet hit him in the back, stop, turn , go up around the spinal column and out his throat perfectly straight?? Impossible.
4:44 "Beyond all doubt." He must work for the government because Stone and other researchers show how things are done (or get done) in Washington. He is convinced that the "magic" bullet did all that damage while it turned, stopped, and so on and later to be found on a stretcher in the hospital. More dirt to cover up the coverup.
Mercy Natividad Jack Ruby one shot. One gun. One whack job shooting another. All this did was ignite conspiracy theories. Which we now know were all false. One man. One rifle. Three shots. Oswald acted alone. Ruby acted alone. End of story. th-cam.com/video/N56jj-DjBUU/w-d-xo.html 🇺🇸RIP🌹JFK🇺🇸
Mercy Natividad The truth. He couldn’t stand the thought of Jackie Kennedy having to come back to Dallas to testify in the trial of LHO. Oswald’s shooting of JFK was more premeditated. Ruby’s shooting of LHO was more impulsive. He had just wired one of his strippers $25 at 11:17am. He left his little dog in the car and walked down the block to the Dallas police station. He entered through the garage where the armored truck was backed up to transport LHO. Ruby had a press pass. And several Dallas policemen knew him. He shot LHO at 11:21am. Dallas Homicide Detective James R. ("Jim") Leavelle had interrogated both Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. He was convinced to his dying day that Oswald was guilty of killing both Kennedy and Tippit and is adamant that convictions would have been secured on both counts. He also knows Jack Ruby acted alone in shooting Lee Harvey Oswald. He never found any credible connection of conspiracy. You can watch Leavelle’s Watch living history interview conducted by The Six Floor Depository Library: jfk.org
John Griffin You really are very very dense aren’t you? You must be the type of guy that thinks everything that comes out in the news and the history we are taught in school is all correct with little to no flaws?? Did it ever occur to you to question things that your gut tells you aren’t right? Look into it unbiasedly and search for the facts and the truth, you may be very surprised at what you find.
@@italian1ist yes, question everything. Like, if the CIA took out the president, why would they let the patsy leave the building, go home, grab a gun, and then walk around the city, where he could and did shoot a cop, get himself arrested, and then talk to the cops and the press for two days? Why not have someone else take him out right there in the sniper’s nest? Why not have a couple heavies waiting for him at his rooming house? Why would the CIA rely on a strip club owner who never shot anyone before with silencing him? Why shoot him in the middle of the abdomen and not in the head? Oswald turned to his right so the bullet travelled sideways through several organs and aorta, whereas a straight shot might not have hit anything but some intestines. Why would you let the man shoot the patsy in front of the whole world on live television and right in front of the cops where he would be caught immediately, and then where he would be put on trial? And why would you trust HIM to stay quiet knowing that he’s facing the electric chair? Question everything, right?
For everyone who feels the need to attack “JFK conspiracy theorists,” I have one question. If the official narrative is so decisive and conclusive, why do you need to defend it? It should stand on its own, no?
It does stand on its own all of the forensic evidence backs to official versions. Nuts jobs refuse to beileve becuase the idea of a alone nobody killed the president is terrifying.
Exactly. Everyone knows it was mainly LBJ. Who stands to gain is the 1st question always asked. Then when you dig deeper there is a mountain of evidence pointing to LBJ and his circle.
LBJ was a puppet.... His reward to help out and keep his mouth shut was being the main puppet in the white house... Kennedy's biggest mistake was thinking he could take the string
@@punkanellylovejoy702 Hmm, speaking of evidence, you may want to read the book 'The Devil's Chessboard' by David Talbot... enjoy your 700 pages of evidence that Dulles was at the epicenter of the assassination of JFK, along with countless other crimes against humanity. What other points are you going to argue, that the Earth is flat sits at the center of the universe, Iraq had WMD, and Covid came from zoonotic transfer? Can't wait to hear the 'evidence' in support of your positions LOL hahahaha
you have one of the best directors of all time in front of you , you can ask him anything and you come out with "Do you see conspiracies in everything"? " . WOW. I couldn't be able to remain calm as Oliver did when asked such BS questions
That could be a whole lecture about social psychology for sure. There are a few of these propaganda points they keep repeating. "Do you see insane lone shooters everywhere? A rational person takes it case by case dear." The "always believe the cover story sickness" is contagious and long lasting.
Now they try to talk about Oswald’s mental health and the hackneyed line that people can’t accept someone so insignificant as Oswald could have such a profound effect on the world. Always same company points pushed.
She could just be establishing that he doesn’t for the audience. If you don’t see everything as a conspiracy it’s more of a reason to pay attention to the things you do
I think that LBJ and J Edgar Hoover conspired to have Kennedy killed using the FBI s' old mob connections. They both hated Kennedy. Johnson knew that Kennedy would be dropping him from the reelection ticket in 1964 and his political career would basically be over. Joe Kennedy used his mob connections to bring the unions power to bear to help Kennnedy be elected in '63 and one of the first things that happens after the election is that John appoints Bobby attorney general and Bobby goes after the mob. I think to the day he died Bobby held himself responsible for his brothers death. When Bobby ran for president the mob knew that if he became president the first thing he would do would be to come after them with the power of the presidency behind him. They couldn't let that happen and it was the main reason they couldn't have had Bobby killed in the first place instead of John because John would have done the same thing .
LBJ to mistress Mrs Brown (Nov 21, 1963 --- at Clint Murchison mansion in Dallas) : " those Kennedy boys will never embarass me again. That's not a threat. That's a promise." JFK and RFK died at the hands of a man that murdered 5 other people including his own sister.
You speak the truth brother! Now, the psychopaths are running this depop operation, to get the needle, and now they are going after the nation's children....it appears it's going to come to a blood letting...before this is all over....I try to warn friends and relatives, but they are oblivious...they actually believe the $30,000 per day propagandist....and I have sent them tons of evidence. It's disgusting...Bitchute is still a platform that is open. Most others are censored along with mass electronic media...including the newspapers...So, sad to say...I suggest you go to medical in Bitchute and get the facts that are hidden from the public...the criminals are very cunning and devious...and are controlling the brains of most Americans....
Pure fabrication. "Dallas assassination researcher David Perry has conducted a very extensive investigation into all of Brown’s allegations, and there is no question in his mind that not only weren’t LBJ and Hoover at the party, but there was no such party. Perry gathered several pieces of evidence debunking Brown’s “party” story. For one, he learned that Clint Murchison Sr., at whose home the party allegedly took place, was in ill health at the time, dating from a stroke in 1958, and had moved out of his Dallas home four years earlier, turning over the ownership of the home to one of his three sons, John, and John’s wife Lupe. In 2002, Perry interviewed Mrs. Eula Tilley, the wife of Clint Sr.’s chauffeur, Warren Tilly, who could not speak at the time because of throat cancer. She told Perry, “Both Warren and I worked for Mr. Murchison for a long time. He had seven houses, you know…I know he wasn’t at any party when Kennedy was shot. He did not have a home in the Dallas area. He was at his Glad Oaks Ranch between Athens and Palestine [Texas, about 120 miles southeast of Dallas]. I’m not sure how long before the assassination we were at the ranch but it was more than a few days. I remember because I was serving lunch to Mr. Murchison and his neighbor Woffard Cain. One of them said Kennedy had been shot.” Additionally, a party the likes of which Brown spoke of, with luminaries such as Nixon, LBJ, and Hoover attending, would have automatically made the next morning’s newspapers-at least the entertainment and society sections if not the daily news. Perry therefore scoured the papers (Dallas Morning News and Dallas Times Herald) but found no reference to any such party. Perry makes the telling point that after all of his investigation, “The only person I know of who claimed [he or] she was actually at the [alleged] party was the late Madeleine Brown.”
His use of the qualifier not one single word is true. It has been thousand of words. Lawyer speak. Very precise, listen to it properly, he admits but sounds as if he denies. Simple, really. Liars.
He’s a prosecutor a government puppet. How many witnesses have died suspiciously? How many eyewitness have dismissed a lone gunman theory and swore there was another shooter? Obviously conspiracy saying Oswald did it and him only is pretty much like telling everyone that the earth is flat
It's definitely a "CONSPIRACY" I say because where is the LEE HARVEY OSWALD INTERROGATION TAPE FROM DALLAS TEXAS AT?! That's something that has slipped the mind's of the American Public!
There’s so many things about that day that doesn’t make sense but one of the earliest oddities of the day and one of the most unbelievable is that whoever was shooting out that window was able to get away. You have Hundreds of combat, security, and police trained people in that area small area. Three shots are fired from the third floor in the building. If there was only one person shooting the place he was shooting from would have been identified by that third shot. Out of all those hundreds of trained witness how did they not get that building locked down before the shooter got out? I don’t want to hear about the chaos and blah blah blah. These were men who were in WWII and Korea. There was either multiple shooting positions to confuse the identification of the Schoolbook Depository or someone with Authority helped the shooter escape.
the u.s. needed him dead. he didnt want to be a puppet. on top of that, he wanted to make this country actually better and not just blow smoke. if you dont trust the goverment, then yeah it makes plenty of sense
You have to understand that how many of the people who believed that there were more than one person was involved in the assassination of JFK have died. Johnson was involved, the CIA was involved and just how many more were involved is a question. The Warren commission was lead by a person who hated president Kennedy with a passion. Kennedy had him removed from his position because of this. There's so many opticals involved in the Kennedy assassination by those who are still alive today because of their involvement in the assassination of JFK. I pray that one day the truth about the JFK assassination will come out.
@Std Disclaimer There's lots of evidence and strangeness surrounding this case. I'm not confident at all that there was wasn't a conspiracy, but a critical mind would be sceptical of the official narrative.
@Std Disclaimer Eh, no. Simple traffic accidents are usually very clear. This case in anything but clear. What is your evidence that the guy actually did it, apart from the authorities saying so?
"If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed-if all records told the same tale-then the lie passed into history and became truth." - George Orwell
All of the "Back-And-Forth" on this, can be solved, simply by watching the fatal moment, when President Kennedy's head suddenly swings back, and to the left, which was the exact moment, when the bullet, that came from in front, and slightly off to the right, slammed into President Kennedy's head, a little above his right ear, tore through his skull, and exited out of the back of his head, leaving a 4-5inch hole in the back of his skull. Upon seeing that:For me, it's "Case closed". Lee Harvey Oswald is vindicated. Innocent as a newborn baby!
Lee Harvey knew about the plot, but he did not fire a shot.As he wrote a letter:, saying that “I am afraid I am apart of something, that I do not rightfully know my part in.”
Can you please provide a citation for that alleged Oswald quote. I've been a JFK researcher since 1975 and can't recall ever reading that. I just googled that quote + the name Oswald and got nothing. I do agree with you that he didn't fire a shot, however.
I dont think Oswald knew the plot. MK ultra mind controlled just tells them where to be and what time. They still do it today with the false flag shooting
Yeah, that story about Bugliosi's affair is nuts. Quite shocking that someone so established in the public eye could be that mentally deranged. Also shocking no one else did some digging on him. It wasn't much of a secret.
O’Neill’s book is nothing but yet another attempt to cash in on the conspiracy craze, engaging in rank unsupported speculation. Bugliosi's book is thoroughly documented.
Here is what bothers me about all this, why are so many of the documents pertaining to this still classified even after 56 years? Also, I would have preferred that the so called 'conspiracy investigations' have been centered on Oswald's connection to the intelligence community and the mafia instead of the single bullet theory which I think has been used as a distraction for the public.
@@captainrev4959 There are unclasifed CIA documents that linked Castro with the killing of JFK but they decided not to invade because of international pressures
One of the shots caused part of his skull to go back onto the trunk of the car. That shot could not have come from the rear. Look at my picture, I am an elk hunter. Never has any elk fallen toward me.
@@ryand141 Head moves violently back and to the left. You have to do mental gymnastics to convince yourself that shot came from anywhere other than the front.
7 wounds in two men from a bullet that stops in mid air makes a right turn drops down a couple of inches and enters the body of the second man and ends up on a hospital gurney in pristine condition!...
7 layers of skin, ballpark figure roughly 15 inches of muscle tissue, hit a dress tie knot, shattered 4 inches of rib bone, hit another bone and then just rolled out like it just came out the mold press.
Absolute Nonsense. sketches in conspiracy books and literature have consistently and falsely placed Connally seated directly in front of Kennedy in the presidential limousine. In fact, Connally’s jump seat not only was situated a half foot inside and to the left of the right door, but also was three inches lower than the backseat-placing him to the left and below Kennedy’s position on the extreme right side of the limousine’s backseat. The HSCA said, “A photogrammatic analysis of several pairs of pictures taken from the Zapruder movie” and viewed through a “stereoscopic viewer…clearly showed that Kennedy was seated close to the right-hand, inside surface of the car, with his arm resting atop the side of the car and his elbow extending…beyond the body of the car. Connally, on the other hand, was seated well within the car on the jump seat.” Moreover, at the moment Kennedy was hit with the bullet to his back, Connally’s body was turned to his right, causing their bodies to be aligned in such a way that a bullet traveling on a downward trajectory, entering the upper right part of the president’s back, passing through soft tissue in a straight line, and exiting his throat (which the Warren Commission and HSCA found), had to go on and hit the governor in the upper right part of his back. And no, the bullet is NOT pristine. It is deformed.
Let's say that there's a small town Sheriff, his wife is found shot to death. The Sheriff says that he in not guilty and the evidence will prove it. Then he says that all of the evidence will be released in 60 to 65 years from now. Are you going to believe that he is not guilty? Or are you going to think that he murdered his wife and is trying to hide the evidence until after his death?
Right! That's why the jury returned a not guilty verdict in less than and hour and it was only that long because several jurors had to use the bathroom. Garrison was a complete liar and a charlatan.
My guy you gotta read the witness report again..They heard the 2nd and 3rd shot directly above them and had debris fall on them due to how the shot shook the inside of that building, they ran to Brennan the construction worker who physically saw the gun and Oswald reloading the gun and pointing it at JFK again
The gunpowder smell is at that level, because it is the aftermath from the DRIVER'S GUN, which was the gun which REALLY killed JFK!! This can be very clearly SEEN on the ORIGINAL UNALTERED Zapruder film, which I was privately shown in 1997
Bugliosi calls it ‘all simple unadulterated nonsense’. Now there you can see how he really wants to defend the official narrative. There is not a slight understanding that people might think there were strange things going on that day. That says a lot about him.
Bugilosi is telling a lie. I am a USMC infantry veteran and I know good and well that Oswald couldn’t have done the shooting. This was a textbook example of a coup de’tat because of Kennedy’s resolve of doing what is in the best interest of all people, not just the rich and powerful. The speech have gave about transparency and Executive Order 11,110 which would have taken away from the private banks the ability to print money sealed his fate.
@@kpettyphoto it was revealed, then quickly scrubbed that Oswald was in Fact under the employ of the CIA when he "defected" to Russia and Oswald was also a paid FBI informant, like CounitelPro keeping tabs on subversive orgs while acting as a member. That was scrubbed from the recently released files inside of a week.
@@canciontequila5855 that's another lie! Stop it kook. Just get off the gas. I've read enough on him (both pro conspiracy and lone nut) to be able to say that that is a freaking lie. Just stop it. Please
Yes because "conspiracy" is also a legal term meaning more than one person involved in planning. "Theories" are what serious people use to study and investigate issues, not just prove official propaganda or lame ideas as has become popular to think for some reason. This is why the insane attacks and posers will be ignored over time, as they should.
As long as more people believe Oswald didn't act alone there will still be a little hope for our country,but oh the myth is so much easier to swallow, especially the better off you are.
Yep. Oswald had no intention of killing President Kennedy. Like he said “he was a Patsy”. Placed there for a whole set of different circumstances that had nothing to do with killing him.
Also works when only one of the three actually knows the details of the secret. The two without all of the information are deemed as not being credible.
@@ilovebeinggay6794 As I recall, his brother visited him in jail and stated that "He had a sheepish smirk on his face, as if he had gotten away with it"
@@stansmad right. And he never ONCE denied it, according to Robert. And that's not all that Robert had to said about Oswald's behavior during that visit at the Dallas jail.
Many highly accomplished sharp shooters have tried to duplicate the shooting of a target with the same rifle and all of them have concluded that for him to shoot all of those bullets as accurately as he did and in the timeframe that they would have had to happened, just isn't possible. The way that you would have to reload bullets into the chamber is far too awkward for this to have been done by Oswald or any other sharp shooter with that particular rifle.
Do not forget your dying King. He did so much good in this world. Even as a Finn from a different country remembers how my mom and dad cried for him. Eisenhower and Jack were the Last bastions of hope and freedom. Satan worshippers killed him and been killing his bloodline to this day. Now its the time to follow their principles. And open your eyes.
The presidential limousine enters Elm Street and after a few meters the first shot is fired by Nicoletti who, together with Rosselli, was hiding in the Dal Tex Building. The first bullet misses the target and hits the sidewalk of the triple railroad crossing at the end of the square and a piece of shrapnel ends up in the face of James Tague, a passerby who was stopping there. The second bullet hits Kennedy in the throat, and as you can see in the footage the president brings his hands to his neck and Governor Connelly turns back to see what happened? The third bullet hits Connally who grimaces in pain as you can see in the film and he brings his right hand to his stomach because he feels an immediate pain and then the bullet goes through his right wrist and into his thigh. The fourth bullet hits Kennedy in the back of the head and the fifth bullet, fired by James Files half a second after the fourth shot splashes both the blood and Kennedy's head backwards, and the brain spill was due to the pressure of the fifth bullet which had made a hole the size of an apple in the back of Kennedy's head, witnessed by the photos of 14 people bringing their hand to the same spot on his head. Returning to Connally, who is the key to clarify the mystery, there is much to be said. 1) First of all, from the inclination at which Oswald would have been shooting, which was about 45 degrees, it would have hit only Kennedy and no one else, the bullet could not in any way take a deflection and then hit the governor. 2) When Kennedy is hit Connally turns back to look at what is happening and stays like that for about three seconds, the time to reload the shot in the rifle; if the governor had been hit by the magic bullet, at the same time as the president, he would have had the same reaction as Kennedy and would have had neither the way nor the strength to turn around and look back. 3) Governor Connally, when he is wounded, is still turned around and you can see a grimace of pain as I mentioned before and then he turns around again and collapses on his wife's legs. 4) In the film you can see how Connally bumps his head in front of the glass that separates him from the driver's and assistant's seats. 5) Do you know why Connally was hit? Because Kennedy was leaning over his wife's right shoulder, because by bending over he did not obstruct the trajectory of the third bullet that almost grazed him and hit the governor, and because the shot was fired by Nicoletti from the window of the Dal Tex Building and reached the governor, because Kennedy was leaning over his wife. Therefore, not only the first bullet that went empty reveals where the shot really came from, but also the one that hit Connally. Undisputable and real evidence, but unfortunately denied by many, including the Warren Commission who veiled so much evidence.
Thanks for the good wrapping up analysis from a former mechanized infantry officer from Germany. After 2,5 years of looking and researching on US sites it pretty much fits to all I have found and which makes (at least) sense (contrary to the official version). Further, the overall political picture combined with the presidents` plans concerning the CIA, Vietnam and other financial and social on goings (together with the actions being taken by his brother) clearly show towards a real "coup d` état" of interested persons inside the administrations and government. Everyone who does not believe in a conspiracy must be dumb.
@@ignatziusturret5641 Thank you. In fact, Kennedy had put himself against all the strong powers of the time and therefore it was a plot organized by a community of powerful people who did not want to be hindered.
So, the critical upshot (no pun intended) seems to be 1) if people believe the seemingly incredible fact that a nobody skinny runt could annihilate a great power figure on a whim, then they are being realistic, but 2) if they believe that it took a concerted and planned effort by a very small but determined cabal obliquely linked to, and antithetical towards that power structure, then they are being overly paranoid, self-indulgently illogical and ultimately 'unrealistic'. Clearly both positions have historical precedents, but the latter is much more common in history. The over indulgence of conspiracy thinking as a current sociological trait does not in any way negate the fact that conspiracies do happen in all manner of magnitudes. In this case, the point is how small or tightly-knit the conspiracy actually was. First significant question has to be.. why did that motorcade not simply carry straight on to the luncheon destination down Main Street. Why was that turning into Elm street deemed necessary? The bend took them back to exactly the same point under the triple underpass as they would have reached if they had gone straight on - it was utterly superfluous from a Presidential motorcade 'timetabling' aspect. Oswald cannot have known they were going to make that turn if he was acting alone, surely? Unless it had been previously announced as a route that would include little old superfluous Elm St. Why was this superfluous turn into a short road deemed necessary, and by whom at the planning stage? Elm st had a large building and fence and tree cover very close to the road, that's why. All other vantage points along Main St were crowded with people four deep, the arial shots would have been made much more difficult by the roads being straight and the problematic presence of close knit crowds liining the roads. No, something smells rotten about it all..
Kennedy broke many protocols about security that day. Just watch '3 shots that changed America'. The open top limo was his choice, greeting crowds etc. He f...d up. Sorry to say. Quote: ' Kennedy broke the cardinal sin of security.'.
The Dallas Times Herald publishes a map of the Kennedy motorcade route on Thursday, November 21, 1963. The Dallas Morning News publishes their map on the morning of November 22, 1963.
Notice throughout this so called reporting, did she address any of the facts, for examaple: A)The school book depository manager and two workers said that Oswald was eating his lunch when the event took place, and a police officer! B) The FBI tested Oswald's clothing for gun powder residue and found non! C) Oswald and Ruby definately knew each other from many witnesses!
"We worked from the presupposition that there was no conspiracy, then conducted an interview that tepidly imagined if there was one without poring through any of the supporting details...Case closed." --Journalism, ladies and gentlemen.
@@vernpascal1531 The problem was that the media is run by the CIA. Have you ever wondered why not one mainstream television station has made a series suggesting a conspiracy in the JFK assassination? Since when did the mainstream media not pander to its largest possible audience? Operation Mockingbird was a huge success
Cronkite was part of Operation Mockingbird. In 1977 famed investigative journalist Carl Bernstein (of Woodward & Bernstein/Watergate fame) published an expose` of the CIA's media disinformation campaign, known as Operation Mockingbird, in which they seeded over 400 known CIA assets throughout the top MSM outlets over a 25 year period, Including CBS. Never mind that it is totally against the law for the CIA to operate within the US! Their job was to spread disinformation about the JFK assassination, RFK assassination, MLK assassination, the Vietnam war, the anti-war movement, the civil rights movement etc... Based upon information obtained from CIA officials themselves, Bernstein named CBS as one of the top CIA disinformation purveyors: "By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc." (he then goes on for 10 paragraphs detailing the evidence of CBS's embedded CIA assets and disinformation work for the CIA (please read below on his website - the long section on the Columbia Broadcasting System/CBS begins about 1/2 way down the page): www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php spartacus-educational.com/JFKmockingbird.htm arretsurinfo.ch/newly-declassified-documents-show-that-cia-worked-closely-with-owners-and-journalists-with-many-of-the-largest-media-outlets/
The main reason that Dallas will remain for a hundred years is that no one got the chance to see Oswald put on trial. You can thank Jack Ruby for that.
If you stop this video at 0:30 you will see the HUGE tree in Oswalds line of sight. They never thought to explain the tree because they knew at the time no one would ask how Oswald was able to shoot Kennedy with that big old tree standing in his way.
Oswald's own brother, Robert Oswald, visited him in the Dallas jail and came away completely convinced that Oswald did it as Oswald never once denied it to him despite his lies in front of the cameras and to the police. Stop spreading your ridiculous lies and do some actual research. Thanks
@@punkanellylovejoy702 what Oswald said or didn't say doesn't matter because you can't get past the tree that blocked Oswald's line of sight. There is no way Oswald shot and killed Kennedy. For one the bullet that killed Kennedy came from the front and blew out the back of Kennedy's head.
I would think the bigger scoop for a reporter (or like all the thousands of reporters over 60 years) would be “hey I work in the media and a guy handed me a bag of money and said “thanks for not saying we killed Kennedy””
Funny he used the “only if two of them are dead” line considering 1 out of the 3 testimonials to the select committee on assassinations that addressed the warren report lived long enough to actually testify
If it was just oswald why are they hiding documents for the past 60 yrs? And furrher more why wasn't kennedy shot on houston st? Ruby opened the can of warms on the 24th! Zapruder Film
Oswald was behind JFK and the killing blow blew JFKs head back and to the left as clearly seen on the Zapruder film. There had to be at least a second shooter in front of Kennedy
The most important man on the planet at that time was oswald. But the dallas pd lets somebody like ruby in the station while oswald is being moved? Hello!?
@@tmac7924 Ruby snuck in down the ramp. He shot Oswald because he wanted to be a hero and felt that he would only get a short prison term ( if any at all) for the killing of someone so despised as Oswald. And even in jail, Ruby did things for attention. Like telling anyone who would listen that if they would get him out of Dallas he would talk to the Warren commission. Lol. If Ruby had any info that could have exposed a conspiracy, they would have easily snuffed him out in jail for making such threats. Ruby had no info.
Many long time resarchers believe Ruby who was a known popular night club owner who had friends in Mafia Ruby shot Oswald so Oswald couldn't say anything in trial about Mafia or LBJ
Physical evidence Several conspiracy theories posit that at least one shooter was located in the Dal-Tex Building, located across the street from the Texas School Book Depository. According to L. Fletcher Prouty, the physical location of James Tague when he was injured by a bullet fragment is not consistent with the trajectory of a missed shot from the Texas School Book Depository, leading Prouty to theorize that Tague was instead wounded by a missed shot from the second floor of the Dal-Tex Building.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories#/media/File:Lho-133A.jpg
Oswal never acted alone back in the 60 we were told in school that Kennedy was doing to much for the blacks the government never tell you what you ask they tell you what they want you to know
Right after he announced his run for presidency and I believe won a primary in California, all of a sudden another "LONE GUNMAN" with absolutely no motive takes him out. AND THEN THEY KILLED HIS SON!!! JFK Jr. runs for Senate in NY as by far the most popular Democrat in the whole country; the same seat who GUESS WHO ELSE IS RUNNING FOR? Hilary Clinton. JFK Jr. dies of a mysterious plane crash, Hilary wins the seat.
Actually there were conspiracies and others involved surrounding the other assassinations. The only assassinations attempts that were unsuccessful were done by lone killers. Think about that.
CIA knew you dont drive the president in an open car in a narrow road surrounded by windows and cheering people, unless you want him removed......that trip should never have happened
The absolute evidence, of course not mentioned here was researched by Stephen Ravelle. In his original film aired only once by the History channel (and then quickly disappeared) was brought out in fine detail by his documentary "The men who killed the president". It was narrated by an American. It was replaced by a standin film called "The men who killed KENNEDY" and narrated by a Brit. Essentially, Chord Meyer (who's wife Kennedy was bagging) along with LBJ had their buddies in Dallas arrange to bring in a Corsican hitman named Lucian Sart. Sarti shot from the front, which is visible in all but the Zaprudder film which is the only version the Warren commission used. Sartis exploding round blew the back of Kennedy's skull out across the trunk of the car, which is why Jackie was seen reaching back across the trunk. Also obvious, is that there were NO secret service near the car, except for one agent who was quickly waved away. Many other pieces of evidence as well, such as the witness who saw Sarti shoot (he was dressed as a cop) and then throw the rifle to a guy dressed in railroad worker coveralls. He packed the gun into a case and then walked it down the railroad tracks. Too much more evidence to list, but bottom line OSWALD DID NOT DO IT!
What I don't understand is ,the final fatal shot, when on impact made his head jolt backwards. Oswald was ment to of fired from behind,so wouldn't the law of pyshics show the presidents head jolting forward on impact and not backwards? I'm no sciencetist,but as far back as I can remember, I have always wondered this 🤔
If you break down the Zapruder film frame by frame, the very first frame of the shooting showed his head lurching forward before snapping back. Kennedy was wearing a large back brace which prevented him from falling forward. The initial force caused the brace to partially bend forward and it then snapped back causing his head to do the same.
He was shot from the drainage system and the limo stopped on the mark it was told to. If you watch frame by frame you can see his head being struck from below and to the front.
Oswalds rifle was found on 4 th floor. A mauser was found on 6 th floor. No examination of rifle took place for 5 hours. Plenty of time to switch rifles.
![Witnessing History: JFK Assassination [Full Documentary] | Spectrum News](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m38C0ZyWbuE/mqdefault.jpg)
It kinda weird that as soon as Kennedy started warning us about the government he dies.
Bill greer the secret service agent killed jfk.
did he warn about the government ?
@@sethxtekken yeah, he tried to draw funds away from the FBI and CIA legit right before he died
@@HoffyRS almost certainly not.
@@captainrev4959 it definitely was
"Conspiracy theory"; what governments call it when they don't want to answer awkward, pertinent questions.
Invented by Zionists
In France, they said antisemit theory🤣🤣🤣
Not quite. "Conspiracy" is what the kookamungus calls it when they don'twanna
Excellent point. See my OP.
Very Best Regards,
Tom Scott
Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System
_Our American Injustice System_
_Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
@@a.m.4148"How did Lee Harvey Oswald get back into the US after he defected to the USSR?"
JFK: "I want to dissolve alot of these government entities and give power back to the American people"
LBJ: "I cannot allow that"
Who is LBJ
Lyndon Baine Johnson
@@mechanicalromance6748 Kennedys VP who took over after his assassination. Had involvement with bell helicopter and our war in Vietnam
@@garyblubaugh2517 he's masters not him
The claim that JFK wanted to "dissolve a lot of government entities" is pure fantasy.
The ultimate and very simple proof that it was a conspiration is that 57 years later the case has still not been made fully public due to “identifiable national security, law enforcement, and foreign affairs concerns”. Yet we should believe that it was one crazy guy alone. Allright
Friendly fire ultimately killed him. It’s blatantly obvious. To make that public would be a huge slap in the face to the Secret Service. No conspiracy, just best to leave the file sealed.
Right. Soviet Union is long gone so why is it security concern. We all know why. It will be like the CIA human experiments conspiracy that came to be true. MK Ultra.
A conspiracy is the ONLY possible reason the government hasn't released all the information? That is your "proof"? Pathetic.
Friendly fire with last shot being a tangible/mercury bullet doing much more damage than the prior! Please explain your theory.
He was killed because he did not want to start a war with Cuba! It's a war machine and Eisenhower had talked about the corruption before this happened!
The only person not shooting at Kennedy, was Oswald.
Of course, look at that feeble twerp.
@Christopher Strimbu yes it's either a mistype or he's a bonafide kook. But let's just call it a mistype. To speculate that this person could be a kook is just so ugly.
@Christopher Strimbu Is it possible that it was a mistype by a kook? No, that's still so ugly. Perish the thought.
@Christopher Strimbu ,, 🤣😂🤣😂
👍
Bs he was shooting at him he just wasn’t the lone assassin…
"Three can keep a secret if two are dead." What if all three are dead?
Too much conflicting, excluded, or ignored evidence for this to not have been a conspiracy and cover-up.
And also, the CIA doesn't exactly go around telling on itself.
William greer was the real murderer
So you claim that EVERYONE who was part of the "conspiracy" immediately died?
Well two are dead. Lee Harvey Oswald was shot and killed by some random dude out of no where. So you can think about that as well and well the CIA can keep a secret they have many.
E Howard Hunt did not keep the secret. He admitted his role in the assassination on tape.
Oswald did act alone. He drank his Coke all by himself on the 2nd floor of the book depository in the break room while the shooting was going on. Just like he said.
except they were out of cola, so OSWALD had a 7UP & got ticked THEN 2 FOR 3 @ JFK - case closed
Why the interest in defending lee harvey oswald?
@@midorimashintaro2092because if he was framed it is the biggest miscarriage of justice in the history of the US.
No one has ever convinced me that a bullet (CE399) caused 7 wounds in two men and lost only 1.5% of its weight.
Bingo
Not only that but how does a FMJ bullet hit him in the back, stop, turn , go up around the spinal column and out his throat perfectly straight?? Impossible.
@@ronmarvicsin7709 ... and the other bullet moved the president's head back and to the left. "Magic" bullets.
And now we have our modern day JFK with the whole Jeff Epstein debacle. Some things never change...
4:44 "Beyond all doubt." He must work for the government because Stone and other researchers show how things are done (or get done) in Washington.
He is convinced that the "magic" bullet did all that damage while it turned, stopped, and so on and later to be found on a stretcher in the hospital.
More dirt to cover up the coverup.
The big question is clear,why did Ruby killed Oswald within just 2 days of assasination
Mercy Natividad Jack Ruby one shot. One gun. One whack job shooting another. All this did was ignite conspiracy theories. Which we now know were all false. One man. One rifle. Three shots. Oswald acted alone. Ruby acted alone.
End of story.
th-cam.com/video/N56jj-DjBUU/w-d-xo.html
🇺🇸RIP🌹JFK🇺🇸
Mercy Natividad The truth. He couldn’t stand the thought of Jackie Kennedy having to come back to Dallas to testify in the trial of LHO. Oswald’s shooting of JFK was more premeditated. Ruby’s shooting of LHO was more impulsive. He had just wired one of his strippers $25 at 11:17am. He left his little dog in the car and walked down the block to the Dallas police station. He entered through the garage where the armored truck was backed up to transport LHO. Ruby had a press pass. And several Dallas policemen knew him. He shot LHO at 11:21am.
Dallas Homicide Detective James R. ("Jim") Leavelle had interrogated both Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. He was convinced to his dying day that Oswald was guilty of killing both Kennedy and Tippit and is adamant that convictions would have been secured on both counts. He also knows Jack Ruby acted alone in shooting Lee Harvey Oswald. He never found any credible connection of conspiracy.
You can watch Leavelle’s Watch living history interview conducted by The Six Floor Depository Library: jfk.org
John Griffin
You really are very very dense aren’t you?
You must be the type of guy that thinks everything that comes out in the news and the history we are taught in school is all correct with little to no flaws??
Did it ever occur to you to question things that your gut tells you aren’t right?
Look into it unbiasedly and search for the facts and the truth, you may be very surprised at what you find.
@@jackgriffin4893 Yup....end of story. They both acted alone.
@@italian1ist yes, question everything. Like, if the CIA took out the president, why would they let the patsy leave the building, go home, grab a gun, and then walk around the city, where he could and did shoot a cop, get himself arrested, and then talk to the cops and the press for two days? Why not have someone else take him out right there in the sniper’s nest? Why not have a couple heavies waiting for him at his rooming house? Why would the CIA rely on a strip club owner who never shot anyone before with silencing him? Why shoot him in the middle of the abdomen and not in the head? Oswald turned to his right so the bullet travelled sideways through several organs and aorta, whereas a straight shot might not have hit anything but some intestines. Why would you let the man shoot the patsy in front of the whole world on live television and right in front of the cops where he would be caught immediately, and then where he would be put on trial? And why would you trust HIM to stay quiet knowing that he’s facing the electric chair? Question everything, right?
For everyone who feels the need to attack “JFK conspiracy theorists,” I have one question. If the official narrative is so decisive and conclusive, why do you need to defend it? It should stand on its own, no?
it ain’t easy to hear that the US isn’t the land of the free and the home of the brave with shmiberty and justice for all.
It does stand on its own all of the forensic evidence backs to official versions. Nuts jobs refuse to beileve becuase the idea of a alone nobody killed the president is terrifying.
@@bulldogsbob insults, what a strong argument you have
Conspiranoics are everywere in everything
It's annoying and the more controversial it is, the more of those weirdos are
@@FumanyuX if you want to think this happened in the vacuum of a bad afternoon in Dallas go ahead
My dad's response when he heard the news of the killing that day was: That God Damn Johnson!
Exactly. Everyone knows it was mainly LBJ. Who stands to gain is the 1st question always asked.
Then when you dig deeper there is a mountain of evidence pointing to LBJ and his circle.
LBJ was a puppet.... His reward to help out and keep his mouth shut was being the main puppet in the white house...
Kennedy's biggest mistake was thinking he could take the string
@@obiwanshinobi87 military industrial complex and cia
Your dad was so right
Johnson’s mistress is on the record saying LBJ was behind it.
Really weird how Allen Dulles, the CIA director was placed on the warren commission don’t you think ?
After being fired by JFK.
The Dulles brothers along with J Edgar Hoover hated the Kennedy's.
Not weird, exactly as planned.
Oh you kooks find all this so-called evidence everywhere don't you. How stupid. That is evidence Of absolutely nothing.
@@punkanellylovejoy702 Hmm, speaking of evidence, you may want to read the book 'The Devil's Chessboard' by David Talbot... enjoy your 700 pages of evidence that Dulles was at the epicenter of the assassination of JFK, along with countless other crimes against humanity. What other points are you going to argue, that the Earth is flat sits at the center of the universe, Iraq had WMD, and Covid came from zoonotic transfer? Can't wait to hear the 'evidence' in support of your positions LOL hahahaha
you have one of the best directors of all time in front of you , you can ask him anything and you come out with "Do you see conspiracies in everything"? " . WOW. I couldn't be able to remain calm as Oliver did when asked such BS questions
That could be a whole lecture about social psychology for sure. There are a few of these propaganda points they keep repeating. "Do you see insane lone shooters everywhere? A rational person takes it case by case dear." The "always believe the cover story sickness" is contagious and long lasting.
Now they try to talk about Oswald’s mental health and the hackneyed line that people can’t accept someone so insignificant as Oswald could have such a profound effect on the world. Always same company points pushed.
That's why we call it "Fake News" today. They've been exposed and still don't even realize it yet.
She could just be establishing that he doesn’t for the audience. If you don’t see everything as a conspiracy it’s more of a reason to pay attention to the things you do
I think that LBJ and J Edgar Hoover conspired to have Kennedy killed using the FBI s' old mob connections.
They both hated Kennedy. Johnson knew that Kennedy would be dropping him from the reelection ticket in 1964 and his political career would basically be over.
Joe Kennedy used his mob connections to bring the unions power to bear to help Kennnedy be elected in '63 and one of the first things that happens after the election is that John appoints Bobby attorney general and Bobby goes after the mob.
I think to the day he died Bobby held himself responsible for his brothers death. When Bobby ran for president the mob knew that if he became president the first thing he would do would be to come after them with the power of the presidency behind him. They couldn't let that happen and it was the main reason they couldn't have had Bobby killed in the first place instead of John because John would have done the same thing .
LBJ to mistress Mrs Brown (Nov 21, 1963 --- at Clint Murchison mansion in Dallas) : " those Kennedy boys will never embarass me again. That's not a threat. That's a promise."
JFK and RFK died at the hands of a man that murdered 5 other people including his own sister.
You speak the truth brother! Now, the psychopaths are running this depop operation, to get the needle, and now they are going after the nation's children....it appears it's going to come to a blood letting...before this is all over....I try to warn friends and relatives, but they are oblivious...they actually believe the $30,000 per day propagandist....and I have sent them tons of evidence. It's disgusting...Bitchute is still a platform that is open. Most others are censored along with mass electronic media...including the newspapers...So, sad to say...I suggest you go to medical in Bitchute and get the facts that are hidden from the public...the criminals are very cunning and devious...and are controlling the brains of most Americans....
100 % correct!
Pure fabrication.
"Dallas assassination researcher David Perry has conducted a very extensive investigation into all of Brown’s allegations, and there is no question in his mind that not only weren’t LBJ and Hoover at the party, but there was no such party. Perry gathered several pieces of evidence debunking Brown’s “party” story. For one, he learned that Clint Murchison Sr., at whose home the party allegedly took place, was in ill health at the time, dating from a stroke in 1958, and had moved out of his Dallas home four years earlier, turning over the ownership of the home to one of his three sons, John, and John’s wife Lupe. In 2002, Perry interviewed Mrs. Eula Tilley, the wife of Clint Sr.’s chauffeur, Warren Tilly, who could not speak at the time because of throat cancer. She told Perry, “Both Warren and I worked for Mr. Murchison for a long time. He had seven houses, you know…I know he wasn’t at any party when Kennedy was shot. He did not have a home in the Dallas area. He was at his Glad Oaks Ranch between Athens and Palestine [Texas, about 120 miles southeast of Dallas]. I’m not sure how long before the assassination we were at the ranch but it was more than a few days. I remember because I was serving lunch to Mr. Murchison and his neighbor Woffard Cain. One of them said Kennedy had been shot.”
Additionally, a party the likes of which Brown spoke of, with luminaries such as Nixon, LBJ, and Hoover attending, would have automatically made the next morning’s newspapers-at least the entertainment and society sections if not the daily news. Perry therefore scoured the papers (Dallas Morning News and Dallas Times Herald) but found no reference to any such party. Perry makes the telling point that after all of his investigation, “The only person I know of who claimed [he or] she was actually at the [alleged] party was the late Madeleine Brown.”
"not one credible word of a conspiracy" -- What planet has he been on?
The planet of Government payroll
Drs from Dallas
His use of the qualifier not one single word is true. It has been thousand of words. Lawyer speak. Very precise, listen to it properly, he admits but sounds as if he denies. Simple, really. Liars.
He’s a prosecutor a government puppet. How many witnesses have died suspiciously? How many eyewitness have dismissed a lone gunman theory and swore there was another shooter? Obviously conspiracy saying Oswald did it and him only is pretty much like telling everyone that the earth is flat
Hes been in Jackie's world too long
D I S I N F O R M A T I O N
m i s l e a d i n g p r o p a g a n d a
101%
G A S L I G H T I N G
It's definitely a "CONSPIRACY" I say because where is the LEE HARVEY OSWALD INTERROGATION TAPE FROM DALLAS TEXAS AT?! That's something that has slipped the mind's of the American Public!
There’s so many things about that day that doesn’t make sense but one of the earliest oddities of the day and one of the most unbelievable is that whoever was shooting out that window was able to get away.
You have Hundreds of combat, security, and police trained people in that area small area. Three shots are fired from the third floor in the building. If there was only one person shooting the place he was shooting from would have been identified by that third shot.
Out of all those hundreds of trained witness how did they not get that building locked down before the shooter got out? I don’t want to hear about the chaos and blah blah blah. These were men who were in WWII and Korea.
There was either multiple shooting positions to confuse the identification of the Schoolbook Depository or someone with Authority helped the shooter escape.
the u.s. needed him dead. he didnt want to be a puppet. on top of that, he wanted to make this country actually better and not just blow smoke. if you dont trust the goverment, then yeah it makes plenty of sense
True.
I believe Mr. Stone’s analogy is correct.
The truth of the JFK killing has never come out!
-- and it won’t until everyone alive during that time is dead. Including me.
Never will either.
You have to understand that how many of the people who believed that there were more than one person was involved in the assassination of JFK have died.
Johnson was involved, the CIA was involved and just how many more were involved is a question.
The Warren commission was lead by a person who hated president Kennedy with a passion. Kennedy had him removed from his position because of this. There's so many opticals involved in the Kennedy assassination by those who are still alive today because of their involvement in the assassination of JFK.
I pray that one day the truth about the JFK assassination will come out.
The Mafia was also involved
In 100 years maybe.
@Std Disclaimer Where do you find this confidence and what if you're wrong?
@Std Disclaimer
There's lots of evidence and strangeness surrounding this case. I'm not confident at all that there was wasn't a conspiracy, but a critical mind would be sceptical of the official narrative.
@Std Disclaimer
Eh, no. Simple traffic accidents are usually very clear. This case in anything but clear. What is your evidence that the guy actually did it, apart from the authorities saying so?
CIA, period..
it was the Fed
Both together and more...........................
The list is long.
William Greer period..
MI6
All the witnesses were killed and that’s all u need to know.
"If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed-if all records told the same tale-then the lie passed into history and became truth." - George Orwell
The "magic bullet" is just laughable.
Our Government spewing their lies to the Sheeple
Not as much as you d think
Only thing magic was the magic mushrooms the Warren commission was on.
The killshot to the head was not from Oswald.
It was from a guy behind the picket fence.
All of the "Back-And-Forth" on this, can be solved, simply by watching the fatal moment, when President Kennedy's head suddenly swings back, and to the left, which was the exact moment, when the bullet, that came from in front, and slightly off to the right, slammed into President Kennedy's head, a little above his right ear, tore through his skull, and exited out of the back of his head, leaving a 4-5inch hole in the back of his skull.
Upon seeing that:For me, it's "Case closed". Lee Harvey Oswald is vindicated. Innocent as a newborn baby!
Lee Harvey knew about the plot, but he did not fire a shot.As he wrote a letter:, saying that “I am afraid I am apart of something, that I do not rightfully know my part in.”
Can you please provide a citation for that alleged Oswald quote. I've been a JFK researcher since 1975 and can't recall ever reading that. I just googled that quote + the name Oswald and got nothing. I do agree with you that he didn't fire a shot, however.
@@lindagiovannazambanini6218 You needed to be researching in 1963 for that. And it was somehow misplaced.
I dont think Oswald knew the plot. MK ultra mind controlled just tells them where to be and what time. They still do it today with the false flag shooting
He was a poor shot according to his Sgts in the Marines.
@@charleswest6372 his scores were above average & this has been public record for a longtime.
The cover-up, and it can't be denied it occurred, proves gvt involvement.
Bugalosi Boogalo dance around the facts. His trial was a mookery of justice. Ruby's bullet put a end to Oswald having a defence.
If you read Tom O’Neill’s book about Manson, you would never trust anything Bugliosi has to say. And Oliver Stone is way more credible by comparison.
Yeah, that story about Bugliosi's affair is nuts. Quite shocking that someone so established in the public eye could be that mentally deranged. Also shocking no one else did some digging on him. It wasn't much of a secret.
Yes absolutely. Bugliosi is a snake who only cares about marketing his ego and image
Oliver Stone's movie is FULL of lies and distortions, and he KNOWS it.
@@robertromero8692 Tell me about them.
O’Neill’s book is nothing but yet another attempt to cash in on the conspiracy craze, engaging in rank unsupported speculation. Bugliosi's book is thoroughly documented.
Here is what bothers me about all this, why are so many of the documents pertaining to this still classified even after 56 years? Also, I would have preferred that the so called 'conspiracy investigations' have been centered on Oswald's connection to the intelligence community and the mafia instead of the single bullet theory which I think has been used as a distraction for the public.
National Archives policy.
0:49
CIA: Did you killed JFK?
Castro: No...
CIA: Ok, thanks see ya!
To be fair if US government had any evidence that he had killed John F. Kennedy they would’ve invaded without hesitation!
@@captainrev4959 There are unclasifed CIA documents that linked Castro with the killing of JFK but they decided not to invade because of international pressures
@@captainrev4959 p
One of the shots caused part of his skull to go back onto the trunk of the car. That shot could not have come from the rear. Look at my picture, I am an elk hunter. Never has any elk fallen toward me.
Do you shoot Elk in the back of moving limos?
@@ryand141 Head moves violently back and to the left. You have to do mental gymnastics to convince yourself that shot came from anywhere other than the front.
7 wounds in two men from a bullet that stops in mid air makes a right turn drops down a couple of inches and enters the body of the second man and ends up on a hospital gurney in pristine condition!...
7 layers of skin, ballpark figure roughly 15 inches of muscle tissue, hit a dress tie knot, shattered 4 inches of rib bone, hit another bone and then just rolled out like it just came out the mold press.
Pretty ridiculous isn’t it.
Full Metal Jacket.
Absolute Nonsense. sketches in conspiracy books and literature have consistently and falsely placed Connally seated directly in front of Kennedy in the presidential limousine. In fact, Connally’s jump seat not only was situated a half foot inside and to the left of the right door, but also was three inches lower than the backseat-placing him to the left and below Kennedy’s position on the extreme right side of the limousine’s backseat. The HSCA said, “A photogrammatic analysis of several pairs of pictures taken from the Zapruder movie” and viewed through a “stereoscopic viewer…clearly showed that Kennedy was seated close to the right-hand, inside surface of the car, with his arm resting atop the side of the car and his elbow extending…beyond the body of the car. Connally, on the other hand, was seated well within the car on the jump seat.” Moreover, at the moment Kennedy was hit with the bullet to his back, Connally’s body was turned to his right, causing their bodies to be aligned in such a way that a bullet traveling on a downward trajectory, entering the upper right part of the president’s back, passing through soft tissue in a straight line, and exiting his throat (which the Warren Commission and HSCA found), had to go on and hit the governor in the upper right part of his back. And no, the bullet is NOT pristine. It is deformed.
@@robertromero8692 exactly right. Connelly was NOT seated directly in front of Kennedy.
Let's say that there's a small town Sheriff, his wife is found shot to death. The Sheriff says that he in not guilty and the evidence will prove it. Then he says that all of the evidence will be released in 60 to 65 years from now.
Are you going to believe that he is not guilty? Or are you going to think that he murdered his wife and is trying to hide the evidence until after his death?
Now that is the most accurate analysis.
Jim Garrison solved the JFK Assassination. John Barbour's website has the documents.
Jim Garrison was a Jesuit in on the hoax.
Right! That's why the jury returned a not guilty verdict in less than and hour and it was only that long because several jurors had to use the bathroom. Garrison was a complete liar and a charlatan.
Ask that judge why some people smelled gunpowder at ground level when oswald fired from the 6th floor
My guy you gotta read the witness report again..They heard the 2nd and 3rd shot directly above them and had debris fall on them due to how the shot shook the inside of that building, they ran to Brennan the construction worker who physically saw the gun and Oswald reloading the gun and pointing it at JFK again
The gunpowder smell is at that level, because it is the aftermath from the DRIVER'S GUN, which was the gun which REALLY killed JFK!! This can be very clearly SEEN on the ORIGINAL UNALTERED Zapruder film, which I was privately shown in 1997
How hard they're still trying....
Bugliosi calls it ‘all simple unadulterated nonsense’. Now there you can see how he really wants to defend the official narrative. There is not a slight understanding that people might think there were strange things going on that day. That says a lot about him.
Bugliosi is a veeery bad dude.
Bugliosi is also a snake, don't believe anything he says.
Bugliosi was a strange dude. He had his own agendas.
Bugilosi is telling a lie. I am a USMC infantry veteran and I know good and well that Oswald couldn’t have done the shooting. This was a textbook example of a coup de’tat because of Kennedy’s resolve of doing what is in the best interest of all people, not just the rich and powerful. The speech have gave about transparency and Executive Order 11,110 which would have taken away from the private banks the ability to print money sealed his fate.
@@charleswilliams6758 I think that is a very good assessment and I fully agree!
When conspiracy now adays are actually the real FACTS
I have a feeling more will come out about this very soon!
@@kpettyphoto it was revealed, then quickly scrubbed that Oswald was in Fact under the employ of the CIA when he "defected" to Russia and Oswald was also a paid FBI informant, like CounitelPro keeping tabs on subversive orgs while acting as a member. That was scrubbed from the recently released files inside of a week.
@@canciontequila5855 that's another lie! Stop it kook. Just get off the gas. I've read enough on him (both pro conspiracy and lone nut) to be able to say that that is a freaking lie. Just stop it. Please
@@punkanellylovejoy702 you must lack common sense or any sense of logic. I pity you!!
Yes because "conspiracy" is also a legal term meaning more than one person involved in planning. "Theories" are what serious people use to study and investigate issues, not just prove official propaganda or lame ideas as has become popular to think for some reason. This is why the insane attacks and posers will be ignored over time, as they should.
As long as more people believe Oswald didn't act alone there will still be a little hope for our country,but oh the myth is so much easier to swallow, especially the better off you are.
He didnt act at all
Yep. Oswald had no intention of killing President Kennedy. Like he said “he was a Patsy”. Placed there for a whole set of different circumstances that had nothing to do with killing him.
"Three men can keep a secret if 2 of them are dead." - well, Oswald is dead (killed)
what about allllllllllll those others involved in the "conspiracy"?
If there’s billions of dollars to be made a secret is much easier to keep for as many people as you want.
"3 people can keep a secret if 2 are dead" Also works if you keep 2 at gunpoint
Also works when only one of the three actually knows the details of the secret. The two without all of the information are deemed as not being credible.
The guy said they "tried" Oswald must of forgot he was killed during his transfer
You obviously know nothing about the London trial.
Was he indeed...?
Must have also forgotten what his brother said after visiting Oswald in jail. That's an extremely huge elephant in the room. Conspiracy DEBUNKED
@@ilovebeinggay6794 As I recall, his brother visited him in jail and stated that "He had a sheepish smirk on his face, as if he had gotten away with it"
@@stansmad right. And he never ONCE denied it, according to Robert. And that's not all that Robert had to said about Oswald's behavior during that visit at the Dallas jail.
Many highly accomplished sharp shooters have tried to duplicate the shooting of a target with the same rifle and all of them have concluded that for him to shoot all of those bullets as accurately as he did and in the timeframe that they would have had to happened, just isn't possible. The way that you would have to reload bullets into the chamber is far too awkward for this to have been done by Oswald or any other sharp shooter with that particular rifle.
Nonsense. What Oswald did has been duplicated.
@@robertromero8692 numerous times too
@@robertromero8692 no it has not . ...
@@errolkim1334 Yes it has. Not that difficult.
Only a semi-auto could do it.
Do not forget your dying King. He did so much good in this world. Even as a Finn from a different country remembers how my mom and dad cried for him. Eisenhower and Jack were the Last bastions of hope and freedom.
Satan worshippers killed him and been killing his bloodline to this day.
Now its the time to follow their principles. And open your eyes.
The presidential limousine enters Elm Street and after a few meters the first shot is fired by Nicoletti who, together with Rosselli, was hiding in the Dal Tex Building. The first bullet misses the target and hits the sidewalk of the triple railroad crossing at the end of the square and a piece of shrapnel ends up in the face of James Tague, a passerby who was stopping there. The second bullet hits Kennedy in the throat, and as you can see in the footage the president brings his hands to his neck and Governor Connelly turns back to see what happened? The third bullet hits Connally who grimaces in pain as you can see in the film and he brings his right hand to his stomach because he feels an immediate pain and then the bullet goes through his right wrist and into his thigh. The fourth bullet hits Kennedy in the back of the head and the fifth bullet, fired by James Files half a second after the fourth shot splashes both the blood and Kennedy's head backwards, and the brain spill was due to the pressure of the fifth bullet which had made a hole the size of an apple in the back of Kennedy's head, witnessed by the photos of 14 people bringing their hand to the same spot on his head. Returning to Connally, who is the key to clarify the mystery, there is much to be said. 1) First of all, from the inclination at which Oswald would have been shooting, which was about 45 degrees, it would have hit only Kennedy and no one else, the bullet could not in any way take a deflection and then hit the governor. 2) When Kennedy is hit Connally turns back to look at what is happening and stays like that for about three seconds, the time to reload the shot in the rifle; if the governor had been hit by the magic bullet, at the same time as the president, he would have had the same reaction as Kennedy and would have had neither the way nor the strength to turn around and look back. 3) Governor Connally, when he is wounded, is still turned around and you can see a grimace of pain as I mentioned before and then he turns around again and collapses on his wife's legs. 4) In the film you can see how Connally bumps his head in front of the glass that separates him from the driver's and assistant's seats. 5) Do you know why Connally was hit? Because Kennedy was leaning over his wife's right shoulder, because by bending over he did not obstruct the trajectory of the third bullet that almost grazed him and hit the governor, and because the shot was fired by Nicoletti from the window of the Dal Tex Building and reached the governor, because Kennedy was leaning over his wife. Therefore, not only the first bullet that went empty reveals where the shot really came from, but also the one that hit Connally. Undisputable and real evidence, but unfortunately denied by many, including the Warren Commission who veiled so much evidence.
Thanks for the good wrapping up analysis from a former mechanized infantry officer from Germany. After 2,5 years of looking and researching on US sites it pretty much fits to all I have found and which makes (at least) sense (contrary to the official version). Further, the overall political picture combined with the presidents` plans concerning the CIA, Vietnam and other financial and social on goings (together with the actions being taken by his brother) clearly show towards a real "coup d` état" of interested persons inside the administrations and government. Everyone who does not believe in a conspiracy must be dumb.
@@ignatziusturret5641 Thank you. In fact, Kennedy had put himself against all the strong powers of the time and therefore it was a plot organized by a community of powerful people who did not want to be hindered.
@@vincenzodangelo127 Yeah, at one time some guys came to the conclusion: Enough is enough.
@@ignatziusturret5641 Infact, and there was the conspiracy.
Damn KOOK!
Too many people actually think the movie JFK is accurate and treat it like it's a documentary.
So, the critical upshot (no pun intended) seems to be 1) if people believe the seemingly incredible fact that a nobody skinny runt could annihilate a great power figure on a whim, then they are being realistic, but 2) if they believe that it took a concerted and planned effort by a very small but determined cabal obliquely linked to, and antithetical towards that power structure, then they are being overly paranoid, self-indulgently illogical and ultimately 'unrealistic'. Clearly both positions have historical precedents, but the latter is much more common in history. The over indulgence of conspiracy thinking as a current sociological trait does not in any way negate the fact that conspiracies do happen in all manner of magnitudes. In this case, the point is how small or tightly-knit the conspiracy actually was.
First significant question has to be.. why did that motorcade not simply carry straight on to the luncheon destination down Main Street. Why was that turning into Elm street deemed necessary? The bend took them back to exactly the same point under the triple underpass as they would have reached if they had gone straight on - it was utterly superfluous from a Presidential motorcade 'timetabling' aspect. Oswald cannot have known they were going to make that turn if he was acting alone, surely? Unless it had been previously announced as a route that would include little old superfluous Elm St. Why was this superfluous turn into a short road deemed necessary, and by whom at the planning stage? Elm st had a large building and fence and tree cover very close to the road, that's why. All other vantage points along Main St were crowded with people four deep, the arial shots would have been made much more difficult by the roads being straight and the problematic presence of close knit crowds liining the roads. No, something smells rotten about it all..
Kennedy broke many protocols about security that day. Just watch '3 shots that changed America'. The open top limo was his choice, greeting crowds etc. He f...d up. Sorry to say. Quote: ' Kennedy broke the cardinal sin of security.'.
HAVE A SLIM JIM
You engage in a lot of "maybes" and "couldas", but you have no physical evidence to back your claim of a conspiracy.
The Dallas Times Herald publishes a map of the Kennedy motorcade route on Thursday, November 21, 1963. The Dallas Morning News publishes their map on the morning of November 22, 1963.
Why was the autopsy not allowed at Parkland?
Why did they determine there was only one assassin with no investigation?
Oliver Stone is awesome
Vincent Bugliosi , many of them who knew, are dead!
Guess you`re right!
And many of them are dead because they were killed when they tried to talk!
Notice throughout this so called reporting, did she address any of the facts, for examaple:
A)The school book depository manager and two workers said that Oswald was eating
his lunch when the event took place, and a police officer!
B) The FBI tested Oswald's clothing for gun powder residue and found non!
C) Oswald and Ruby definately knew each other from many witnesses!
“Three people can keep a secret.. but only if two are dead” 😤🔥🔥 5:08
What a contrite little statement. Baby brained take. How about the 2 dozen witnesses and others who died violently following the assassination.
@Henry Rollin absolutely
How profound
"We worked from the presupposition that there was no conspiracy, then conducted an interview that tepidly imagined if there was one without poring through any of the supporting details...Case closed." --Journalism, ladies and gentlemen.
bucky barnes killed him, magneto tried to save him by bend the trajectory of the bullet
Walter bought it hook, line, and sinker.
They all did in the media. Never looking below the surface...
@@vernpascal1531 The problem was that the media is run by the CIA. Have you ever wondered why not one mainstream television station has made a series suggesting a conspiracy in the JFK assassination? Since when did the mainstream media not pander to its largest possible audience? Operation Mockingbird was a huge success
Cronkite was part of Operation Mockingbird. In 1977 famed investigative journalist Carl Bernstein (of Woodward & Bernstein/Watergate fame) published an expose` of the CIA's media disinformation campaign, known as Operation Mockingbird, in which they seeded over 400 known CIA assets throughout the top MSM outlets over a 25 year period, Including CBS. Never mind that it is totally against the law for the CIA to operate within the US! Their job was to spread disinformation about the JFK assassination, RFK assassination, MLK assassination, the Vietnam war, the anti-war movement, the civil rights movement etc... Based upon information obtained from CIA officials themselves, Bernstein named CBS as one of the top CIA disinformation purveyors:
"By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc." (he then goes on for 10 paragraphs detailing the evidence of CBS's embedded CIA assets and disinformation work for the CIA (please read below on his website - the long section on the Columbia Broadcasting System/CBS begins about 1/2 way down the page):
www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php
spartacus-educational.com/JFKmockingbird.htm
arretsurinfo.ch/newly-declassified-documents-show-that-cia-worked-closely-with-owners-and-journalists-with-many-of-the-largest-media-outlets/
@@lindagiovannazambanini6218 And Bernstein was one of them too. He helped take out Nixon.
@Donald Ring Walter was a communist and well paid for his opinions
You can't have cover ups without conspiracies.
They still can't get over Stone's film 😂😂
This is exactly how a conspiracy works, so much mess that the truth never comes out.
CIA killed him
Who killed President Kennedy? is the same question of who is the mastermind who deposed President Soekarno of Indonesia? it was maybe the same side
The main reason that Dallas will remain for a hundred years is that no one got the chance to see Oswald put on trial. You can thank Jack Ruby for that.
If you stop this video at 0:30 you will see the HUGE tree in Oswalds line of sight. They never thought to explain the tree because they knew at the time no one would ask how Oswald was able to shoot Kennedy with that big old tree standing in his way.
Oswald's own brother,
Robert Oswald, visited him in the Dallas jail and came away completely convinced that Oswald did it as Oswald never once denied it to him despite his lies in front of the cameras and to the police. Stop spreading your ridiculous lies and do some actual research. Thanks
@@punkanellylovejoy702 what Oswald said or didn't say doesn't matter because you can't get past the tree that blocked Oswald's line of sight. There is no way Oswald shot and killed Kennedy. For one the bullet that killed Kennedy came from the front and blew out the back of Kennedy's head.
@@jetcitysinatra7300 please cork it kook.. Thanks
@@punkanellylovejoy702 so the tree blocking Oswalds line of fire doesn't matter? Maybe he was Klark Kent and didn't tell anyone.
@@jetcitysinatra7300 I said CORK IT!
@5:00 he failed to mention many witnesses were killed quickly after the assassination
There you have it; the government investigated itself and found no wrongdoing!
All these years later and the media still covering up!! This is why we can’t have nice things smh
suse man wiatever
@@jb-vb8un complete L comment..at least spell correctly
@@kenr215 a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony
@@kenr215 CHAPPAQUIDDICK
I would think the bigger scoop for a reporter (or like all the thousands of reporters over 60 years) would be “hey I work in the media and a guy handed me a bag of money and said “thanks for not saying we killed Kennedy””
A little dirt poor, nobody killed a very rich, well connected powerful man...That to me is a very powerful conspiracy in itself about life...
Oh you've been reading too many spy novels
Funny he used the “only if two of them are dead” line considering 1 out of the 3 testimonials to the select committee on assassinations that addressed the warren report lived long enough to actually testify
If it was just oswald why are they hiding documents for the past 60 yrs? And furrher more why wasn't kennedy shot on houston st? Ruby opened the can of warms on the 24th! Zapruder Film
Dead men tell no lies and there are plenty of them in this case
Over 160-300..
Was it a conspiracy? Without a doubt.
Leave it to a American prosecutor to accuse a man who hasn’t been proven guilty of lying. Then calling that evidence of his guilt …
Oswald's lies and guilt have been proven.
@@robertromero8692 ok crazy man
Innocent people get put in prison all the time the government is evil
Oswald was behind JFK and the killing blow blew JFKs head back and to the left as clearly seen on the Zapruder film. There had to be at least a second shooter in front of Kennedy
Watch the footage frame by frame and you have your answer
The Warren Commission was so full of crap!
WHY ARE HIS TAXES AND HIS MOTHERS TAXES ALL STILL A SECRET
Because Oswald was on the US Government payroll.
"Skinny, weak-chinned little character"? Wasn't he in the Marines!
The most important man on the planet at that time was oswald. But the dallas pd lets somebody like ruby in the station while oswald is being moved? Hello!?
Both deaths were faked.
They didn't let Ruby in the station. Do some research before spewing bs
@@punkanellylovejoy702 well punk, enlighten us as to how and why he was in there.
@@tmac7924 Ruby snuck in down the ramp. He shot Oswald because he wanted to be a hero and felt that he would only get a short prison term ( if any at all) for the killing of someone so despised as Oswald. And even in jail, Ruby did things for attention. Like telling anyone who would listen that if they would get him out of Dallas he would talk to the Warren commission. Lol. If Ruby had any info that could have exposed a conspiracy, they would have easily snuffed him out in jail for making such threats. Ruby had no info.
@@tmac7924 you've just been enlightened T Quack. Run along now.
If Oswald acted alone , then why did Jack Ruby whacked Oswald?
I believe Ruby simply felt he would be crowned a hero, especially in Jackie's eyes.
Many long time resarchers believe Ruby who was a known popular night club owner who had friends in Mafia Ruby shot Oswald so Oswald couldn't say anything in trial about Mafia or LBJ
Oliver Stone is a crank. Anyone who took the time to listen to the witnesses who were actually there would know Oswald acted alone.
Bravo to Mr. Stone.
The only reason they’re 60% of people who think Oswald acted alone is because that percentage of that majority is dead
Oswald was the patsy.
Physical evidence
Several conspiracy theories posit that at least one shooter was located in the Dal-Tex Building, located across the street from the Texas School Book Depository. According to L. Fletcher Prouty, the physical location of James Tague when he was injured by a bullet fragment is not consistent with the trajectory of a missed shot from the Texas School Book Depository, leading Prouty to theorize that Tague was instead wounded by a missed shot from the second floor of the Dal-Tex Building.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories#/media/File:Lho-133A.jpg
Oswal never acted alone back in the 60 we were told in school that Kennedy was doing to much for the blacks the government never tell you what you ask they tell you what they want you to know
No one believes the official story
explain Robert Kennedy ? oh yea another lone gunman !
Let's tell them: explain JFK Jr.?
Coincidence?
Makes you think, doesn't it?
Right after he announced his run for presidency and I believe won a primary in California, all of a sudden another "LONE GUNMAN" with absolutely no motive takes him out.
AND THEN THEY KILLED HIS SON!!! JFK Jr. runs for Senate in NY as by far the most popular Democrat in the whole country; the same seat who GUESS WHO ELSE IS RUNNING FOR? Hilary Clinton. JFK Jr. dies of a mysterious plane crash, Hilary wins the seat.
@@saado99 no, JFK Jr. Is alive
@@joshuaherpolsheimer4699 No...smh
@@philwright2480 yes he is. He is Q
Actually there were conspiracies and others involved surrounding the other assassinations. The only assassinations attempts that were unsuccessful were done by lone killers. Think about that.
Oswald was killed 48 hours later by Ruby ... 100% proof that Oswald did not act alone but Ruby did.
100% proof 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Ranuk Abeylath Thanks. Lol
And how does that qualify as proof?
@Ranuk Abeylath lmao
@@punkanellylovejoy702 must be feeling lonely in that deluded bubble of yours eh?! Peanut sized intellect!
Wow. The female reporter’s presentation was such a simple minded and naive exposition. Sad.
CIA knew you dont drive the president in an open car in a narrow road surrounded by windows and cheering people, unless you want him removed......that trip should never have happened
Ruby was willing to talk but they wouldn't accommodate his demands
The CIA took him out
YOU WERE RIGHT OLIVER!!
The absolute evidence, of course not mentioned here was researched by Stephen Ravelle. In his original film aired only once by the History channel (and then quickly disappeared) was brought out in fine detail by his documentary "The men who killed the president". It was narrated by an American.
It was replaced by a standin film called "The men who killed KENNEDY" and narrated by a Brit.
Essentially, Chord Meyer (who's wife Kennedy was bagging) along with LBJ had their buddies in Dallas arrange to bring in a Corsican hitman named Lucian Sart. Sarti shot from the front, which is visible in all but the Zaprudder film which is the only version the Warren commission used.
Sartis exploding round blew the back of Kennedy's skull out across the trunk of the car, which is why Jackie was seen reaching back across the trunk.
Also obvious, is that there were NO secret service near the car, except for one agent who was quickly waved away.
Many other pieces of evidence as well, such as the witness who saw Sarti shoot (he was dressed as a cop) and then throw the rifle to a guy dressed in railroad worker coveralls. He packed the gun into a case and then walked it down the railroad tracks.
Too much more evidence to list, but bottom line OSWALD DID NOT DO IT!
Yeah, Revele had it right. Very close indeed..and they completely debunked his truths bc the two other guys..snipers had alibis. Totally ridiculous.
Anyone who thinks there was a conspiracy is wrong! It was obviously just Oswald stop stressing yourself out!
What I don't understand is ,the final fatal shot, when on impact made his head jolt backwards.
Oswald was ment to of fired from behind,so wouldn't the law of pyshics show the presidents head jolting forward on impact and not backwards?
I'm no sciencetist,but as far back as I can remember, I have always wondered this 🤔
If you break down the Zapruder film frame by frame, the very first frame of the shooting showed his head lurching forward before snapping back. Kennedy was wearing a large back brace which prevented him from falling forward. The initial force caused the brace to partially bend forward and it then snapped back causing his head to do the same.
He was shot from the drainage system and the limo stopped on the mark it was told to. If you watch frame by frame you can see his head being struck from below and to the front.
Oswalds rifle was found on 4 th floor. A mauser was found on 6 th floor. No examination of rifle took place for 5 hours. Plenty of time to switch rifles.
His head was blown apart from the front. That's a FACT!
Yep, it was an exit wound. The shot came from the rear.
@@robertromero8692 oh really.? Why was his brains splattered backward then? How does that logic work?
@@zzzthaoster High contrast photos make it clear that the spatter pattern is forwards.
@@robertromero8692 There's only blood spatter towards the back of the car, none in the front.
@@zzzthaoster Wrong. Connally even stated that he had brain tissue on him.
Stone is one of the smartest man in the world. Oh yea and a good Director of Film.
Remember why did the witnesses who ran up the grassy knoll, not toward the Texas book Depository
they heard it was a free twinlie bar