Helios 40 ws Helios 40-2 Wich one is better?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ก.ค. 2024
  • Legendary helios 40 compared with it's new reincarnation helios 40-2.
    Which one is better? My in depth review reasonably answer this question!
    I'm a professional lens seller/repairer
    Please visit my eBay stores for serviced USSR/German foto equipment
    www.ebay.com/str/retrofotohou...
    www.ebay.com/str/vintagephoto...
    00:00 - General information
    00:49 - Photo samples
    01:08 - Helios 40 technical specs
    03:10 - Modern cameras proper adaptation
    04:12 - Helios 40-2 introduction
    05:09 - Differencies explained
    07:55 - Helios 40 test footage
    08:25 - Helios 40-2 test footage
    08:55 - Test charts compared
    11:17 - Personal feelings and conclusion

ความคิดเห็น • 53

  • @RetroFotoHouse
    @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Helios 40-2 available here www.ebay.co.uk/itm/193852217157

  • @Cityscrbbls
    @Cityscrbbls ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The best and completed review on YT! Thank you!

  • @williamkazak
    @williamkazak 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Roman. I have seen wonderful pictures on the various vintage Facebook groups. The pictures from this lens usually are quite impressive.

  • @rickbyrne7631
    @rickbyrne7631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you Roman. My black 40-2 [861877], made in the same factory, has a tripod mount and weighs 902g without 67mm filter. It is a M42 thread mount.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hi Patrick! You have old USSR 1986 made version. I talk about new one, from re-newed production from 2013. They are quite different

    • @rickbyrne7631
      @rickbyrne7631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@RetroFotoHouse Yes, with the added "bonus" of a small amount of oil on a few of the aperture blades :-)

  • @denisrandomtech5822
    @denisrandomtech5822 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As always another great review!

  • @roman9509
    @roman9509 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is the new production Helios 40-2-N (N - for Nikon mount), there is the original Helios 40-2 that was produced in the USSR after Helios 40 production ceased. It has the tripod mount!

  • @rogersandvik2826
    @rogersandvik2826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very usefull information. Thank you!

  • @hugoerpen4581
    @hugoerpen4581 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very interesting comparison. Both lens have amazing bokeh!

  • @jpcalamaro961
    @jpcalamaro961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    An outstanding video. Interesting, relevant and actionable.

  • @mikeno62
    @mikeno62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting to see the differencen between the 2 lenses, great video :-)

  • @miriammoriarty8588
    @miriammoriarty8588 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful comparison thankyou.

  • @kenshinhimura4126
    @kenshinhimura4126 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i had both, helios 40 silver is better on colour but 40-2 is sharper, i prefer silver helios 40. it produces dream images!!

  • @shila999
    @shila999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the review. Although you recommend the new Helios, I prefer the old one and I've just bought one on Ebay :)

  • @TheClique
    @TheClique 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have totally fallen head over heels in love with your lenses. I have subscribed, and I plan on buying a lens a month for a while.

  • @kitebabe05
    @kitebabe05 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bookeh beast,i wish i could afford one ... i love the warm touch of all zeiss glasses and i would prefer the old version. i like the heavy feeling of all the glass and metal XD, nice review, happy new year!

  • @frk380
    @frk380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing bokeh shoot

  • @FilmDat
    @FilmDat 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loving the work you put it! Do you still have any for sale?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right now-not, but can seek for nice one upon a command

  • @DanielKurganov
    @DanielKurganov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this great video. Just bought the 40-2!
    What is the difference between 40-2, 40-2-C, and 40-2-H ?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      first is m42 mount, second is Canon EF mount, third is Nikon F mount

  • @watch4joygroup441
    @watch4joygroup441 ปีที่แล้ว

    Спасибо за обзор

  • @yogifirangi329
    @yogifirangi329 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this very informative review. BTW how can any one contact you ?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes, via my FB page at fb.com/retrofotohouse

  • @flyingcutless
    @flyingcutless 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your reviews are outstanding. Please can you answer . Will the Jupiter 9 lens work and focus properly on Ltm 39 mount barnack Leica rangefinder?? Thanks

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      no, it needs to be tuned first

    • @flyingcutless
      @flyingcutless 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankyou for you reply . Will my Jupiter 3 be ok and if not can I send you both lens to be tuned and regreased . Can you also cla barnack Leica iiif.

  • @alexblaze8878
    @alexblaze8878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have an eBay store by the same name (retrofotohouse) correct?
    If you are the one I bought a Helios 44 adapted to Nikon F mount, well I am very impressed!

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much for your kind words!

  • @Pennsler
    @Pennsler 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey so I got one yesterday. The 40-2.
    But mines does not have the traditional 6XXXX or the N7XXXX.
    Mine is like yours. It says “150204”
    What does this mean? Is there a different between them?

  • @gerhardwiesinger
    @gerhardwiesinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice, which of the Helios 40-2 versions do you recommend? As far as I saw there are Helios 40-2, Helios 40-2 (Zenith from 2013), Helios 40-2 (Zenith from 2019) versions available, right? Any comment would be great. Thnx.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I review helios 40-2 from 2013. In my point of view it is better than helios 40

    • @gerhardwiesinger
      @gerhardwiesinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RetroFotoHouse I know you reviewed Helios 40 vs. Helios 40-2. There are some versions of Helios 40-2 (not Helios 40), see above and here: www.slrlounge.com/russian-lensmaker-zenit-announces-new-helios-40-2-85mm-f1-5/
      Some have Zenith Logo, some not.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes, i review helios 40-2 2013 production. The one in your link is from 2019. It is a bit of different body design.

    • @thurthevintagelens
      @thurthevintagelens 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RetroFotoHouse I bought a 1974 KMZ, 40-2 how does it compare it also has tri- pod mount. it is a multi-coated lens.

  • @zedacruja681
    @zedacruja681 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice video RETRO,like to ask you something I have the silver 40 1.5,but need the tripod MOUNT.....NOT THE SAME YOU HAVE BUT THE ONE THAT GOES AR.OUND,,,,,,,like yours have screws 3 of them mine its the ring around .T Y

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t have tripod you need

    • @zedacruja681
      @zedacruja681 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RetroFotoHouse but go you have any idea where I can get it Please TY.

  • @larrymccormick3226
    @larrymccormick3226 ปีที่แล้ว

    WS !

  • @jakasampuna30
    @jakasampuna30 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please review Helios 77M-4 F1.8/50mm. Thank you

  • @stevocem
    @stevocem ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a 40-2 version, black, of the Soviet times. How does that one compare?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  ปีที่แล้ว

      i'm talking about it in my video, comparing it to helios 40

    • @stevocem
      @stevocem ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RetroFotoHouse I thought you are focusing on the newly produced Russian Helios 40-2, not the Soviet 40-2.

  • @myblueandme
    @myblueandme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    40-2 one is better

  • @Moriarty2007
    @Moriarty2007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Да ладно, можно и по-русски. Зачем так напрягаться?

  • @alinazang6651
    @alinazang6651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the 44M?

    • @mixbsd
      @mixbsd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Different lens: 58mm f/2.