DDDDAAAYYYMMMMM "Actually, in the united states innocent is define as someone who is unaware of their actions, and I'd prefer to go with that definition." AMURICA
The second speaker really irritated me; she refused to answer questions too often, was very rude, and avoided their points on purpose. I truly hope the judge voted for the anti-death penalty team, just based on her actions and behavior alone.
He is reading his initial statement. At the speed of light. Faster reading = more points = higher score. This isn't debate, it's a reading contest. Only the judges and the other debaters are able to follow.
Ah, this video brings me back to highschool...and the terrible terrible debates we had to do >.< One of the most stressful things I felt I had to do in highschool.
...It's religious headwear, and this was also a mock debate used to post on the HSPDP website to show newcomers the process of HSPDP debate. It's not a formal debate by any means.
poorly argued on the part of the supporters of the death penalty, however, there are I think 2 cases of innocent death penalty cases, which should have been better researched by the opposition. furthermore, the economic cost of putting a person to death in the u.s. exceeds 300 million dollars, which wouldve been a good rebuttal to the "overcrowding of prisons". the topic of racism and bias was a distraction from the issue, and more of an opinion about the judicial system. very good job on both parts, but I think in a few years this argument would be better addressed by these very impressive kids.
these guys speak super slowly compared to champion high school debaters, they wheeze between sentences and whenever they talk, they do it faster than pro rappers.
In prison, criminals are fed, they get T.V. and outside time. What justice is that? If a criminal is responsible for taking a life, they do not deserve to live theirs. Some people think it is showing nothing for the value of human life, but it is of the highest price. A murderer has taken the highest value from someone, something they can not get back, and if he gets to eat, sleep, drink and live their own life, maybe even have a chance to get out of prison, that is not justice.
woah, saanen vaeltaa, did you just annalize what he was wearing head to toe? Who the heck cares? Even if it is religious head ware, it doesn't matter. This is high school, not a professional debate. (it's kinda wierd that you noticed what kind of shoes he was wearing.) (they the shoes aren't banned in school are they? Nor are the shorts) get a life.
To the first speaker on the proponent side: You speak way too fast and anxiously. It is difficult to understand and simultaneously process your points when you talk at such a speed. Your physical appearance also takes away from your presentation. I don't know what you're doing with your hair or headwear but it is completely inappropriate for a serious discussion, as are the long shorts and skateboarding sneakers.
saanen vaeltaa I understand the shorts but the US is about freedom including freedom of religion. The Headwear is religious. If I were him I wouldn't have broken the laws of my religion for a debate.
DDDDAAAYYYMMMMM "Actually, in the united states innocent is define as someone who is unaware of their actions, and I'd prefer to go with that definition." AMURICA
Drunk drivers are unaware of their actions, does this mean they are innocent?
Yes
define drunk driver?????????
Joseph Cupido A person intoxicated while driving, normally in an accident. A.K.A DUI (Driving Under the Influence)
so .01 ??????????????????? technically speaking that's still breaking the law. I am asking YOU what you think is drunk driving.???????
Joseph Cupido I meant intoxicated past the point of not being able to drive properly, I believe the legal level is 0.8.
The second speaker really irritated me; she refused to answer questions too often, was very rude, and avoided their points on purpose. I truly hope the judge voted for the anti-death penalty team, just based on her actions and behavior alone.
The second speaker tells them to give a clear example but did she herself provide any?HYPOCRITE!!!!!!
Too fast... the first debater was way too fast.
you could just pause it when you need to write notes
if someone is raped this is no amount of therapy that will ever truely undo the damage.
slow down there, son.
+j luke Hypernova This is nothing.
Sigurd Mjelve How fast can they get?
About warp 3: watch?v=ZZeDq90Ar4k
Sigurd Mjelve Is he chanting?
He is reading his initial statement. At the speed of light. Faster reading = more points = higher score. This isn't debate, it's a reading contest. Only the judges and the other debaters are able to follow.
Ah, this video brings me back to highschool...and the terrible terrible debates we had to do >.<
One of the most stressful things I felt I had to do in highschool.
+Ilikefunandgames
Haha I feel the pain now...
+Ilikefunandgames doing this debate shit right now. fucking sucks
Urgh me too
...It's religious headwear, and this was also a mock debate used to post on the HSPDP website to show newcomers the process of HSPDP debate.
It's not a formal debate by any means.
Poorly argued on both parts unfortunately.
He was going so fast I couldn't even under stand him!
Synister Spyder you need to watch a policy debate round. If you think this is fast, policy debate will blow your mind
Hayden Hoffman here’s a few nice and slow rounds: m.th-cam.com/video/BDhyWX-1AR8/w-d-xo.html
m.th-cam.com/video/e4MzZ_WS_Ww/w-d-xo.html
the 1st guy is too fast :(, but i like the way he debates though
my debate topic: Macs are better than PCs
Byron Cai LOL
***** oh God...you just went there
+vegaskidd lol
poorly argued on the part of the supporters of the death penalty, however, there are I think 2 cases of innocent death penalty cases, which should have been better researched by the opposition. furthermore, the economic cost of putting a person to death in the u.s. exceeds 300 million dollars, which wouldve been a good rebuttal to the "overcrowding of prisons". the topic of racism and bias was a distraction from the issue, and more of an opinion about the judicial system. very good job on both parts, but I think in a few years this argument would be better addressed by these very impressive kids.
I watched this in my language arts class. Very profound
Oh cool
Er guys it is not about their apperance. This is debating!
This a really great video and this will with my debate tomorrow for U.S. History.
i like the last speaker of the opposition side, hahahaha! i like the way she delivers her speech!
lol everytime a black guy came up i was expecting some deep ass voice
A very different version of policy debate.
what are both teams writing when someone is speaking?
+Sonia Abraham rebuttals
Why did they have to tap the tables? That's stupid!
I know right.
Their speeches need better impacts
salem witch trials were not in the 1800s, but over 100 years before that.
who won?
The Affirmative team isn't very polite.
Who won?
I'd say it all depends on the crime.
I thank this is a great strategy and I also see this entertaining.
1:00 poisoning the well is not an argument.
the first speaker on the positive team was not convincing at all the first negative totally burned him.
these guys speak super slowly compared to champion high school debaters, they wheeze between sentences and whenever they talk, they do it faster than pro rappers.
his hair and headwear are a part of his religion
im sure that can be overlooked when discussing appearance
Is this oxford oregon debate?
theres no death penalty in my country, how sad!!!
I did a better debate on this topic in Grade 8
What kind of debate is this? Certainly not public forum or anything in the NFL
Parliamentary Debate
horrible why is the frist dude rushing
How can you even stand living in a country that practice death penalty? It would defenitely be below my dignety!
In prison, criminals are fed, they get T.V. and outside time. What justice is that? If a criminal is responsible for taking a life, they do not deserve to live theirs. Some people think it is showing nothing for the value of human life, but it is of the highest price. A murderer has taken the highest value from someone, something they can not get back, and if he gets to eat, sleep, drink and live their own life, maybe even have a chance to get out of prison, that is not justice.
triggered I am not positive but I don't think murderers get that treatment.
They have a life in prison
Affirmative team is so rude!
These people are speaking waaay too fast...
Is the first guy that started the debate wearing a hat or is that his hair...? Please tell me thats a hat.
No....
YEET
debating
You go boy!
Sad debate. Wow.
u nd to be fast to say all the info u nd to bck up ur opinions
wow.......................
woahhh buddy, slow down
he states to many false points in one minute, can't take that shit.
woah, saanen vaeltaa, did you just annalize what he was wearing head to toe? Who the heck cares? Even if it is religious head ware, it doesn't matter. This is high school, not a professional debate. (it's kinda wierd that you noticed what kind of shoes he was wearing.) (they the shoes aren't banned in school are they? Nor are the shorts) get a life.
Jeeeeeeez chill
why would someone want to abolish the death penalty???????? that's so sill..........................LOL
Death penalty *cannot* be abolished for Rapists !
rip ma nigga 2 poc
baho muh ug baba
blablablablabla
To the first speaker on the proponent side: You speak way too fast and anxiously. It is difficult to understand and simultaneously process your points when you talk at such a speed. Your physical appearance also takes away from your presentation. I don't know what you're doing with your hair or headwear but it is completely inappropriate for a serious discussion, as are the long shorts and skateboarding sneakers.
saanen vaeltaa I understand the shorts but the US is about freedom including freedom of religion. The Headwear is religious. If I were him I wouldn't have broken the laws of my religion for a debate.
26:01 the guy with the top knot is like "woah there"