Sony 20mm f/1.8 Review by Ken Rockwell

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
  • Sony 20mm f/1.8 Review by Ken Rockwell
    Full Review & Sample Images www.kenrockwel...
    I'd get my 20/1.8 at www.bhphotovid...
    or www.adorama.com...
    A7R IV Review & Samples www.kenrockwel...
    Examples of why I love ISO 50 www.kenrockwel...
    Mystery Text 660, A45, AUDP -40 @ 2:1, MP 16, LMT -1
    When you click on the links above to various merchants and make a purchase, this can result in me earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
    Ken Rockwell® is a registered trademark.

ความคิดเห็น • 156

  • @81springbrook96
    @81springbrook96 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    What??!!?.? You are THE Ken Rockwell!??? The guy that does written reviews online? Wow!!! I started reading your stuff back in the canon 40D days! You are a legend!! Say no more. Sub and liked. Because of you it made purchasing decisions easier and learning about cameras easier too!!! Appreciate your work. I just started my own channel about film photography. Please come by and say hi when you have time!!!!!! Omg!!!! You have a great day sir! With love. Cheers!

  • @chillcopyrightfreemusic
    @chillcopyrightfreemusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you for this video Ken! I purchased the 20mm a few months back based upon your review and I wanted to let you know I appreciate your website and i'm glad to see you breaking into TH-cam!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Love the lens? A 20/1.8!is ultra useful. Canon doesn’t make one, and Nikon can’t ship theirs.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks!!!!!! Love it? 20/1.8 is ultra useful.

    • @chillcopyrightfreemusic
      @chillcopyrightfreemusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Oh man I adore it! I just jumped back into photography/videography after years away. I used to use Nikon DX cameras but I am currently using a Sony A7iii so it is quite the improvement over what I was familiar with. I got all this gear with the intent of capturing some footage to use with the music I post on my yt channel. Your review also helped me decide to get the 2.8 opposed to the f4 70-200 and I've been nothing but elated with all the lenses I've purchased after reading your reviews. Thanks again!

    • @chillcopyrightfreemusic
      @chillcopyrightfreemusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh and the 20mm is genuinely mind-blowing especially close up and in low light focusing. Nice it stops all the way to f22 as well

  • @nooddles12
    @nooddles12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve had your website bookmarked as long as I can remember. From the Nikon Fe, to the Fuji x100s, your honest take has helped me with this hobby. I’m glad I found your TH-cam channel. #Subscribed

  • @orphanuprising
    @orphanuprising 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice review. If you change the AEL button on the rear of the camera to manual focus, you can hold that button and use manual focus, then release and it'll go back to AF. It helps me alot cuz I never have to actually switch focus modes in camera.

  • @youuuuuuuuuuutube
    @youuuuuuuuuuutube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    4:50 => if you want the lens to react when you turn the focus ring, then use DMF mode, it's AF-S + manual focus override. It would be nice to have an option to have the AF-C being overridden, but most people don't want the focus ring to override anything as they could touch it by accident ... there's another option: use a recall custom hold button, so when you push this, the lens goes to DMF which lets you focus manually, and that way, you're not wasting any time switching anything.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, but the fact that you have to mess with mode settings makes it far less useful. DMF is usually pretty block and only applies to one AF mode anyway. Thanks!

  • @gavingo8969
    @gavingo8969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Funny how many are fans of Ken. Haha I have been reading his site for a very long time too when I had very bad Gas on film cameras. Nice to see you here in youtube.

  • @therealsergio
    @therealsergio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ken, I know you have your standard complaint about focus-by-wire and "not having time to play with your settings". I have figured out a setting that resolves this, giving you the best of both worlds. Simply set your camera defaults (once and for all) to Manual Focus, and engage AF through back-buttons (I have three programmed, so that depending on which button I press I choose Wide, Zone or Flexible Spot area modes based on target size and background focus static. This settings stance has the property that when you grab the manual focus wheel, you are in manual focus mode, so the camera ALWAYS responds to manual control. Need AF, demand it instantly by one of your back-button focus engagement buttons. Using the "Recall Custom Holds" those can be setup at button press to morph settings to AF-C, a selected AF Area zone, and any other settings you want. Its like having a 4 cameras in your hand, that morphs from one to another at the press of a button.

    • @therealsergio
      @therealsergio 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Perhaps in light of this ability, rather than fault Sony for not working as it should, you might acknowledge it working in a way few other cameras have ever offered that much versatility in configuring.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only DSLRs and Nikon Mirrorless have proper instant manual override. Thanks!

  • @AgnostosGnostos
    @AgnostosGnostos 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lens hoods are not just for preventing lens flaring. They protect the front element and filter thread against minor hits. Also they reduce the unavoidable dust on the front element of the lens too. No need for very frequent cleaning.
    A lens hood with a very good filter are a great protection against accidents that soon or later happen to everyone.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! They’re mostly for keeping my fingers off the lens.

  • @letran-kz7pw
    @letran-kz7pw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ken is one of the best camera reviewers, I have ever known .

  • @PlunderRoad
    @PlunderRoad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just ordered one Open Box to pair with A7C
    with Warranty! Thanks for reviews on this and Canon R6.

  • @AgnostosGnostos
    @AgnostosGnostos 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    With the Sony 61 MP a7R IV all new Sony full frame e-mount lenses have to be very sharp and adequate for the future e-mount cameras of very high resolution.
    Lenses aren't designed just for the present cameras but for the future ones too.

  • @got2beable
    @got2beable 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great review and awesome tips and tricks from an experienced photographer. you totally got my sub and i like to see more of my 20mm :D

  • @lhutton1
    @lhutton1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks For the excellent review.

  • @terbang78
    @terbang78 ปีที่แล้ว

    What great narration for an enjoyable review. Thanks.

  • @antistiolabeo8950
    @antistiolabeo8950 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This sounds like a little gem of a lens indeed. I was going to break the bank to buy the 24 1.4 for astrophotography but this new one could be a fantastic alternative.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm, similar. Depends which you prefer and if you’re on a clock drive.

    • @letran-kz7pw
      @letran-kz7pw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about Sony 24 2.8 , Ken ? Thanks

  • @Donbros
    @Donbros 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    20:10 lol i sometimes do that XD and i use hoya too woooho! those filter are good front cap. I mean I am sometimes so much rushing that this saves time but usually i use cap because those filters are ain't cheap. But hardly comparable to lens price

  • @mukeshb2196
    @mukeshb2196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review Ken ! Just ordered an A7C and brought this as my first lens to go along with the A7C. Mostly plan to take it along when I travel and have my picture clicked with the landscapes in the background . Did I make the right choice Ken ? Kindly advise.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great choice. That and the 24-240 and your set for anything.

  • @gregturner_awod
    @gregturner_awod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent review Ken, informative and thorough. I bought this lens a short time ago (before watching your review) and love it. Light weight, easy to use, and very very sharp images.

  • @agenericaccount3935
    @agenericaccount3935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not a photographer. Still found myself riveted. Well done. Learnt a lot that I will probably never use, but that's ok.

  • @WestCoastRacingLeague
    @WestCoastRacingLeague 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait the Ken Rockwell has a TH-cam Channel?! Immediate sub!

  • @gardenst4398
    @gardenst4398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review. Would like to see a low light comparison of both lenses - 20mm/1.8 vs 24mm/1.4. Just do it Ken...that will be truly AMAZING.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty much the same. These are very different focal lengths that tell very different stories.

  • @rogermcevilly7332
    @rogermcevilly7332 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like your reviews, as they are no nonsense. As in 'takes same pictures but get the pricier one if you want to show off'. 'In the lab this is better, in the real world, they are the same'. I agree. I bought the Sony 24mm 1.4 gm here just because I wanted the lower light, and can then skip the sony 35mm 1.4 gm by just cropping in post.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. I do thank goodness that we have so many choices. Thanks!

  • @robwasnj
    @robwasnj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd love to see a side by side image comparison between this lens and the 16-35GM zoom at 20mm. Of course this is faster but at the same aperture how would the stack up? As for your sentiments on 24 vs 20 I couldn't agree more and for that reason didn't purchase the 24, to me a very "meh" focal length. Thanks for the review Ken, your delivery is always clear and concise without distracting music or unnecessary frills.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The same sharpness. All as good as you can see on 60 MP.

    • @robwasnj
      @robwasnj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Nice, I don't even have 60 mpixels but even at 42 I notice some lenses render things better, I think my 135 and 90mm macro are my faves. I'm a bit like you with expecting my stuff to last 20+ years, not a fan of throw-away mentality. I'm guessing the GM might be a bit better build but then again more stuff to go wrong in a zoom.

  • @MannyG32968
    @MannyG32968 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent review!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Excellent comment!!! Thanks!

  • @Cyberbronco
    @Cyberbronco ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How do you make stills look so good in video?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Not to be a wise guy, but it comes down to over 50 years of experience learning how to make good-looking stills. Once you have one, I simply drop my JPGs onto iMovie and have at it. Thanks!

    • @Cyberbronco
      @Cyberbronco ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Thanks! I use Adobe Premiere and stills look like garbage. I’ll give iMovie a try. Appreciate the response.

    • @Cyberbronco
      @Cyberbronco ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV F-me! You ROCK! IMovie is totally the way to go to make stills look great! Much appreciated amigo!!!

  • @Reviews4fun1
    @Reviews4fun1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You had me at smooth trigger pull. Maybe people can learn another life skill through photography.
    🇺🇸 🦅 🇺🇸

  • @paulo7200
    @paulo7200 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ken, why can't Nikon get their act together on lens design? The Sony 20 1.8 is 3.33" length at 373g the Nikon Z 20 1.8 is 4.27" and 505g. Will the Nikon have better image quality commensurate with its extra size / weight?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We’ll see. The Sony is pretty close to perfect.

  • @DavidStella
    @DavidStella 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good review. Thank you

  • @Lucamitm
    @Lucamitm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you think of this one vs a 14mm ? Have you reviewed the laowa 14mm? Thanks

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This Sony is superb. Laowa is mostly very primitive (think 1970s) all manual lenses, in no way comparable to Sony. 14mm is a very difficult focal length to use well, much less useful than 20mm. See also www.kenrockwell.com/tech/how-to-use-ultra-wide-lenses.htm

    • @Lucamitm
      @Lucamitm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV great article thanks a lot!

  • @henrygentles1894
    @henrygentles1894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is iso 50 ok on my A7R2? Will it improve blacks on that camera too?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Black is black. ISO 50 will make it cleaner but watch your highlights. See
      www.kenrockwell.com/sony/a7r-ii.htm#perf
      for examples

  • @gabithemagyar
    @gabithemagyar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I so wish that SONY would put out an APS-C version of this lens with OSS. 20 mm on APS-C is an extremely useful focal length,

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed. Thanks!

    • @TW-iu9zy
      @TW-iu9zy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      gabithemagyar ... the 20/f1.8 G-lens is very sharp on my a6600. 👍🏻

    • @gabithemagyar
      @gabithemagyar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TW-iu9zy I'm sure it is but my cameras (a6000, a6300) do not have IBIS so the lack of OSS is an issue for me. I shoot hand held in dim light (museums, galleries, cathedrals etc) quite often. I also prefer to buy APS-C lenses for these cameras, I have no intention of switching to full frame.

    • @TW-iu9zy
      @TW-iu9zy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      gabithemagyar ... year, you are right. The lack of OSS is a big problem, especially if the lenses are expensive like the Sonys. But it is a really nice „30 mm“ lens on the a6600.

    • @gabithemagyar
      @gabithemagyar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TW-iu9zy Yes. I love that focal length on APS-C ! I have the 20mm f2.8 pancake which is OK for street photography in daylight but is not great for indoors hand held.

  • @adventure_photo
    @adventure_photo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very thorough and informative review! Thanks Ken! Should be receiving mine tomorrow and then selling my Zeiss Loxia 21mm. 😊

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good by ZEISS! They were hot back in the 1950s and 1990s.

  • @reddavis1877
    @reddavis1877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems the Hoya HMC UV 0 is no longer available. Has Hoya replaced it with an updated version?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hoya keeps changing things. They always have a lot of different models of the same thing. Here’s the best bulletproof filter www.adorama.com/HY67UVHD3.html?kbid=21866

    • @reddavis1877
      @reddavis1877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KenRockwellTV I have a 67mm B&W coming for my copy of this lens. Hope it's close to being as good as a similarly priced Hoya. So difficult to get good intel on filters. Thanks for this video on the 20mm G. I just got mine and look forward to using it. Your review gave me a lot of confidence in it. Before buying anything, I usually look to see if you have a review of it.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@reddavis1877 B+W is awesome. Almost every B&W, Hoya, Heliopan and Tiffen filter is great; this is the last thing about which you need to worry.

  • @MichaelCortese1
    @MichaelCortese1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    On my Nikon Z6 the manual ring immediately overrides the auto focus for me. The lenses I know this works on are the 50 f1.8, 24-70 f4, and 70-300 f4-5.6 with the FTZ

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, but sadly not with Sony. Thanks!

    • @dennischapin
      @dennischapin 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTVWorks with Sony when using most of the Sigma Art lenses.

    • @MichaelCortese1
      @MichaelCortese1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Ahh I misheard you in the video!

  • @woodywoodman4309
    @woodywoodman4309 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I currently have the manual focus Tokina FiRN 20mm/2.0 and it does decent but I'm sure this would beat it for Astrophotography. I'd really like to know if Sony is going to release something in this line even wider. Since I have the Tokina I'd love to have the 24mm/1.4 and a 12-14mm range/1.8, but if this is the widest they are releasing I'll buy this over the 24mm.
    I'd really like to see astrophoto comparisons of this 20mm vs the 24mm/1.4 when you do your review, thanks in advance. Cheers.

  • @paullavender6227
    @paullavender6227 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great review Ken. I love your attitude to photography.

  • @apicharjiratanan4285
    @apicharjiratanan4285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best! Just dont forget to manual focus!

  • @Anarki2U
    @Anarki2U 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish Sony will make a serie of lenses for very high resolution for landscape photography, compact, rugged, with aperture ring, the 20mm 1.8 G lens looks ok, I wish for macro lenses, manual focusing, with aperture and NO stabilizer, I wish for compact and light 300mm 3.0, 400 4.5 and 500mm 5.6, off course only primes ! Thank you very much Sony, oh I forgot, please upgrade the 55mm 1.8 with a AF on/on button (or make it in a manual focus version) plus aperture ring, a 60mm FF allround macro lens will be great ;)

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just a matter of time. Leica been at photography over 100 years, Canon and FujiFilm have been at it since the 1930s, Nikons been making cameras since the 1940s, but SONY only got serious a decade ago.

  • @herbiespizza
    @herbiespizza 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow , zooming in really shows amazing detail. Does that have anything to do with the 60 mega pixel sensor on the Sony A7 Riv or is it as you implied, that its the lens.?

    • @boostedprince8163
      @boostedprince8163 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s definitely the high megapixel count of the Sony body and the clarity of the lens

    • @bryanescalante2871
      @bryanescalante2871 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is the megapixels the more you have the more detail is able to capture watch some videos on some 100 megapixel cameras and watch how much detail they capture... Also the sharpness of the lens adds more details of course

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both. Mostly the sensor; 20mm lenses have been this sharp stopped sown for decades. At f/1.8 you need one of the newest lenses to be sharp wide-open. Thanks!

  • @JJ-vp3bd
    @JJ-vp3bd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Ken! Would you recommend this as a travel lens . Going to a Europe trip and just wanted to carry one or two primes.

    • @JJ-vp3bd
      @JJ-vp3bd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking of gettng this or the old minolta 20mm which seems to have good reviews on dyxum

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, great lens for travel; so much smaller than 16-35. MAXXUM 20/1.8 and Sony's version of the A-mount lens are the same, primitive 1980s design nowhere near as good as this new 20/1.8.

    • @JJ-vp3bd
      @JJ-vp3bd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Thank so much Ken you are a legend. Im off saving $$ for that new 20mm prime. Seems like a great choice overall.

  • @slr7075
    @slr7075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No Ken! You're not converting to Sony right?!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No! Canon is my favorite if I have something serious to shoot. Sony has awful ergonomics and Sony’s Vivid JPG colors aren’t as good as Nikon or Canon’s. But SONY is popular and you people always want to know what I think, so there you go.

  • @johnsoncityaerialphotograp7201
    @johnsoncityaerialphotograp7201 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are those shots in Palm Springs Ken? Reminded me of home..

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some are close; I love it out there. Thanks!

  • @1209jayt
    @1209jayt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ken, thanks for posting this. Can I use the aperture priority from in body camera rather than from the lens? Thanks

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes! Set the lens ring to A and do it. See www.kenrockwell.com/sony/lenses/20mm-f18.htm#usage where I explain “While the A setting of the aperture ring implies that you'll get Program or Shutter-preferred exposure mode at that setting, what it really does is move the aperture setting to the camera's front control ring rather than at the lens.”

    • @1209jayt
      @1209jayt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV You great man, thanks for the tip.

  • @maryannmachi5822
    @maryannmachi5822 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still using the Sony A7. Would this lens perform well on that body? Thank you!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Will work AWESOMELY! Lenses are always a great investment, cameras are not. www.kenrockwell.com/tech/lens-or-camera.htm

  • @MoElf
    @MoElf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello
    Is it good wih a7c for low light video indoor !?
    Thx

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, but a 20mm lens is a very special effect in video. You wouldn’t want to use it for more than a few seconds as an establishing shot or otherwise only for raising tension for other weird shots.

    • @MoElf
      @MoElf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV thank you for replay
      What is best lens with sony a7c for low light video please !?
      Thank you for help

  • @mainmain5303
    @mainmain5303 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Z 20mm F1.8s?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      See kenrockwell.com/nikon/z/20mm-f18.htm

  • @madrobotgames2677
    @madrobotgames2677 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will they ever make a 16mm f1.8?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Never say never; who knows? Thanks!

    • @Donbros
      @Donbros 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Still no 16mm f1.8 XD

  • @mikelpimentel9192
    @mikelpimentel9192 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there, Ken! I've been watching your reviews here on youtube for a while now but I'm wondering, when will you start posting Canon content? I've read your mirrorless camera review comparing the 3 biggest brands right now though I'm still quite torn between Canon and Nikon -- I'd love to start seeing some canon reviews soon! Love your reviews. Keep em up

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Canon is what I love and shoot the most because they're the best brand and the number-one selling brand, too. It's just a matter of time.

  • @ChrisPoli
    @ChrisPoli 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Ken! Great review. For those of us on APSC, if we are looking for that 30-35 look, would you recommend the 20 1.8 on the a6600?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No; just use a kit or APS-C lens that covers that that focal length. I don’t recommend mixing lens formats.

  • @Michaelpai1230
    @Michaelpai1230 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will you compare this with the Nikkor Z 20 1.8 S?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally different camera systems so what’s to compare? Sony has less distortion but only Nikon 20/1.8 has full-time instant manual focus override. Both are ultra sharp wide open.

    • @dr.sommer5069
      @dr.sommer5069 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV in the nikon body you can also adept the Sony lens

  • @mayabeejakubowska7677
    @mayabeejakubowska7677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professional :)

  • @philipmitchell1983
    @philipmitchell1983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review. Please do some for Fuji lenses and cameras. Thx

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Detailed reviews for every Fuji lens are at www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/index.htm#xf. I just got my 16-80 so look for that review soon; every other Fuji lens is reviewed in full there.

  • @jamesollick4413
    @jamesollick4413 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ken! I am a long time reader of your website and happy to see you on TH-cam. How about a video review on the Nikon 14-24 f2.8?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some day when all this new stuff isn’t coming out as fast as I can tan about each new thing. Whew, the Japanese never stop!

  • @AceHardy
    @AceHardy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    📝

  • @jbello9398
    @jbello9398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well plastic will save us money and will feel light, but as long as it does a great job, I’m ok with plastic

  • @arunashamal
    @arunashamal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ken.. I am getting into low light nightclub photography.. can you recommend a good not expensive nikon camera for it? (old second hand ok!) only requirement is 2 card slots... and probably full frame due to the light..Is D3 a good one or is there anything else you recommend?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I LOVE my D3 and shoot it every day in my studio. Go for it!

  • @bhaskarpatel7233
    @bhaskarpatel7233 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @theNTmob
    @theNTmob 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’re the best Ken

  • @TristanBarrocks
    @TristanBarrocks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is dope

  • @OlegKorsak
    @OlegKorsak 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    16:30 - green dot matrix around the sun... crap

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Normal with digital cameras. Don’t point it at the sun if you don’t want these, or use different apertures. Thanks!

  • @ab85main73
    @ab85main73 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super excellent review, thank you

  • @WilliamWallaceRoss
    @WilliamWallaceRoss 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Other Sony users are asking the question......Why? I'll keep buying Sigma, thank you!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why? Possibly because SONY may have better service after 7 years go by and Sigma tends to walk away. I’ll admit that’s a long shot and that there’s so much coming out so fast I haven’t looked at the Sigmas lately. I prefer to use camera brand lenses as long term when new bodies come out I have much better luck with compatibility in the future, and again that’s a minor point if Sigma only costs half as much. Thanks for being out there for all of us!

  • @fingerhorn4
    @fingerhorn4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Ken, your reviews are so good, and practical, and you are clearly an accomplished photographer. But why do you use such ridiculous colours? Do you live in a kind of kaleidoscopic world that no-one else sees? Your photos are so technically good, and sharp. Why do you need to ramp up the saturation to beyond any perception of good taste? Is it because you think this is a way of appearing original, or is it for some other reason? Are you so dissatisfied with the real world that you need fantasy colours to make it more tolerable? This is an honest question.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is how I see the world. My world is brilliant, fresh and vivid. We all see differently; when I use color I want it strong, or I shoot black and white. Thanks!

    • @MikeLikesChannel
      @MikeLikesChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV I'll just call you, "Mr. Velvia!"

  • @TW-iu9zy
    @TW-iu9zy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ... yes, great! the next boring review here. 😄