Boeing Recoverable Launch Booster
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
- The Boeing doublebody, winged booster, known as Model 832-40
made use of a Dyna-Soar glider as the crew module and escape capsule.
Powered by twin clusters made up of 4 Rocketdyne J-2B rocket engines for vertical boost and 3 hydrogen-fueled, General Electric MF239C Turbofan engines for horizontal flight and landing. Designed for use with a variety of upper stages
Source: media.defense....
Song: Max Brhon - Cyberpunk [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds
Free Download/Stream: ncs.io/Cyberpunk
Watch: • Max Brhon - Cyberpunk ...
#boeing #nasa #ksp
I think this video includes one of your best VFX shots yet, that being the tracking shot of approach and landing. There’s something about the way you were able to paint out Endeavour almost entirely and replace it with something that, for the most part, is able to fit in perfectly, down to the haze of the video feed and just its external appearance, with the way it reflects the runway beneath it. Genuinely great stuff, showing how truly talented you are in this field and how far you’ve come from your earlier work.
They use a mix of real footage and the rendered vehicle i believe
@@Aerospaceshorts I know.
Superb shot indeed. Best part of an already great production.
@@Aerospaceshorts Nope.
This is entirely CGI.
@@Aerospaceshorts Apart from the voice over this is.
At first I thought this was a LV for the Dyna-Soar on top, but using it as the command section/escape vehicle is pretty slick.
What about the payload especially with humans? This design didn’t take into account what happened to space shuttles when they strapped them next to boosters did they? It’s a cute little video too show kids but no where near practical in the year 2024.
The Boeing 832-40C was supposed to be capable of carrying a verity of upper stages on its back, including the X20 as a payload.
@@TurtleFootMiningim guessing the payload would not contain any humans, since there is much safer crew compartment on the top of the rocket (that can abort).
The reflections on the body at touchdown are awesome.
Opening shot looks straight of Thunderbirds TV shows, brilliant!
Jet engines on the booster stage would make for easier return to base at slower speeds.
What an impressive CGI.
Not going to lie, but if this was actually made, it would save the U.S. a lot of money.
I wish they could also fly the Venture Star, I *loved* this SSTO design =)
As goofy as this craft looks, its a valid design.
Looks amazing. The texture on the metal is so good.
Yes.
that landing ! very impressive shot
Bad ass, and with Xcom2 music or something like it. I say, lets get a couple of these for the Space Force and rock and roll. All phases were gorgeous.
Ok that thing just Looks bonkers.
I assume the "Small plane" i the Front Acts as an emergency escape vehicle for the Pilot of the Boost section?
It's a Dyna-Soar. Yes, used as the crew module for the booster and as an escape capsule.
This is a graphics job
Wow, if only they had built it. Great animations
Fantasic work ! and yes this is A Dyna-Soar on top of booster serve as canard for booster and escape system for Pilot
That is so cool!! I bet NASA engineers watch your channel all the time!
As long as this thing doesn't have any door plugs that could pop off, they'll be fine
Good thing that this was a concept than the real thing. Just the cost of building this vehicle, transporting to the launch site, recovering, any repairs, or replacement parts, and the man hours to maintain to flight status, would be enormous. More than several moon missions and the next generation shuttles combined.
That is an awesome concept, and animation. Back when Boeing could actually make stuff that works.
Check out John Oliver's "Last Week Tonight" segment on Boeing, and where they think that the problems began. Funny, of course, but quite informative...
I don’t know how you do it. Each video better than the last.
⁹
Is this "beyond awesome" or what? Incredible! Thanks for producing this!
This is exactly what I’ve came up with in KSP! I used the mk2 for the fly back also I used the mk1 parts for the shuttle on top. I’ll leave the carrier craft in lowest orbit and then recover after I send my shuttle too a station.
Wow! This is amazing! This totally looks like REAL video of real vehicle flight and especially the landing and roll-out..
Very nicely done!!
This looks pretty stunning of an idea, technically. Two of these make up form factor of R-7 pretty much, just reusable instead of crucifying themselves after separation.
Modern day design ofc doesn't need no pilots, nor so many turbofans perhaps
you work is improving... looking better and better..
I recognized the "Dyna Soar" vehicle from seeing the Artist Conception drawing way back in the 1970's or earlier! Wasn't that an early concept vehicle designed right after the data from our X-15 project was analyzed?
Мощь! Это очень близко к полётной схеме советской системы "Спираль", хотя орбитальный самолёт здесь получается тяжелее.
Качество впечатляющее. Правдоподобность на высоте.
Да ладно загонять. У советского союза кроме Бурана не было реализовано ни одной программы модуля многоразового использования. Фантастики начитался.
@@Skipper441 ты на комментарий к мультику, который никогда не был реализован, отвечаешь тем, что "проект Спираль никогда не был реализован"? Ты наркоман? =) У Дайна-соар и Спирали в равной доли были реализованы орбитальные космические самолёты. И тот и другой были опробованы американскими и советскими пилотами в нескольких тестах посадки!
@@Skipper441 а у штатов что, кроме челнока ещё что-то было? 🤦♂ (не считая современного spacex, но тут-то речь про старые системы) ️
This is the first time I'm seeing this unique design. Please rest assured you did it justice!
Thank you for sharing this with us! 650th like.
3:22 This ladies and gentleman. Is true VFX
Good to see mission abort escape vehicles ... now. The Challenger crew cabin fell for nearly 3 minutes during which the astronauts were alive until hitting the water at over 200 mph and 25 Gs. There was water found in their lungs. Not even a parachute.
Impressive work!
Thank God NASA (or anyone) could do CGI like this in the 60s and 70s. The Moon deniers would be unstoppable.
It's kind of sad to think that for every shuttle program built there were probably 15 designs scrapped and never realized! I just hope that with AI and new technology breakthroughs more companies and nations can get into the business so that space travel becomes as routine as trans-oceanic flights are now! Virtually accessible to all peoples!
X-20 DYNASOAR as a cockpit?
Chipmunks could fly on that thing!
*Spectacular*
This was an awesome 😎 little exercise, in imagining what could of been... Very 😊 fun.. And for those who want to continue to bash Boeing, I for one, am thankful, that they, (Boeing) helped prevent German, from being our national language... Have some historical perspective folks...
Nice!
1:56 - 😍
On peut toujours rêver!
Wow, that tracking shot!
Ironic how close this is to NASA's original Space Shuttle concept.
This concept would have had more survivability than the Space Shuttle with the Dyna Soar being an integrated escape system. The Space Shuttle didn't have ejection seats or an escape capsule. The Space Shuttle Crew Escape System unfortunately required the astronauts to unstrap from their seats, make their way to the escape hatch, evacuate using an extending pole to slide away from the craft, and then deploy their parachutes. This would've required precious seconds to evacuate, making survival of a catastrophic event highly unlikely.
Who did the landing voice? I liked that voice 😅
I think it's just the audio of a shuttle landing
That voice!
I thought both the X-20 Dynasoar and whatever that small black orbiter from the boater section would detach at the same time, and I thought that the big silver shuttle thing would just land on its own as a reusable booster as well.
Wonder if they're going to ship this one with all bolts installed
Great Shot 🤘🇱🇷
This whole thing is the most real looking cgi I have ever seen can we do close encounters that same way return of Roy Nerrey
Amazing job,😮
The descent cam was absurd, it looked photoreal.
I love how there is just a little Dyna Soar haphazardly attached to the front of it
I find the SpaceX Starship pimp much more interesting; it does not require a runway.
Realy I like this video
That’s fukin cool!
We all know that if Boeing did build it, it would be missing at least a few bolts.
It's called a drough chute, not a drag shoot. A drough chute *produces* drag.
Красивый мультик.
amazing work as always!
Great art!
Should totally work but if not there's the Starliner to fall back on, LOL.
Great job!@!!
Epic! 😎
Awesome video, cool concept, beautiful looking vehicle.
❓ Question for anyone- 🎥Camera Shake effect, I'm growing wary of it, am I alone?
I wonder If it has any door plugs?
Thanks
Thank You
looks like a retro rocket
New rendering engine? Looks so much more realistic
That'd be terrifying to pilot hahaha
Superb.
Man....we used to dream big and bold......now, we can't even get out of low earth orbit....so sad
Its the X33 but made in the Space Race and a TSTO
Good graphics, from which video game??
That is one T H I C boi
Honestly, doing the maths, can't see why this wouldn't do a horizontal takeoff from a LONG runway or lake bed and then accelerate to transonic before zooming.
Nice CGI but ....Since this is Boeing, the project will cost several times it's original budget, go many years past it's planned inception, and then fail because some dumb designer forgot about flame retardant wiring tape.
Looks like venturestar 🎉
Why don’t you do a video on the Aldebaran Spacecraft from 1959 next?
perfect
And this will create enough aerodynamic lift at landing?
Ну как понял Дюна Соллар это пилотируемая капсула которая отстреливась бы в случае аварии, но на хрена ее делать пилотируемой? Проще все таки автоматизировать систему посадки это не сложно, в нас БОРы в 60-е вполне сами садились
Не-а, ошибаешься. В 60-ых компьютеры ещё были размером со шкаф. И единственный вариант был это посадить пилота в многоразовый топливный бак с крылышками. И в 1970-ых когда все-таки построили Спейс Шаттл с 4-мя бортовыми компьютерами, которые просто дублировали друг друга, то они то и дело сбоили по несколько раз за полёт. И, несмотря на то, что они имели возможность автоматического управления посадкой, их так никогда и не использовали для этого. Только к концу 1980-ых компьютеры шагнули достаточно вперёд.
@@nhhfdyhvdfghh не правильно выразился, дистанционно, на радиоуправлении. Это даже в первую мировую делали.
@@user-bj7cp6hm3qче ты несёшь? 🤦♂️
Неа ты малограмотен-иди в школу.В отличии от США ВСЕ советские корабли были ВСЕГДА автоматами с пилотами на борту.
Королёв не доверял пилотам ВВС.А вся автоматика работала не на ЭВМ на борту а на лампах и механических автоматах.А ЭВМ была на земле и управляла советскими кораблями по линиям связи которых были СОТНИ! США такого уровня автоматизации полётов достигли только в 90 годы.@@nhhfdyhvdfghh
забыл поставить тебе лайк. пришлось посмотреть еще раз. просто супер видео!
Boeing is finished. A little animation is all she has left.
Gear doesn’t come down till 300 feet?
Why didn't the spacecraft not separate from the booster?
Let's hope that Boeing has these doors under better control...
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 What program do you use to make a 3D model please?
I thought it had two shuttles and both were gonna separate 😆
Much better than space shuttle and Starship
it's probably based on the space shuttle concept
Do Boeing have it on the drawing board??????
So the 1st stg is controlled by man! (Can Elon add a Dragon on Starship as an escape capsule?
Using a Dyna-Soar as the cockpit is a bit strange in my opinion.
so the guys in the orbital spaceplane are pretty much screwed in an emg but the guys on top are ok?
What shuttle did this rocket lift?
Either Boeing hires programmers from Google and Microsoft or make the duct tape a require tool for events that go wrong.
That seems a stripped-down version of the X-33/Venture Star
More like Retro-Star, eh!? Eh?
What’s up with the Dyna-Soar on top?
Parabens continua no estudia cometa de Halley chip no asteroide
Why is the X-20 attached? Seems like just dead weight
But, will the door plugs stay in? ;-P
Unfortunately, the proposed solution will not be effective. Simply adding wings to the existing space shuttle and extra engines for landing will not yield the results depicted in the video.
The Thunderbirds 21st century version
Yeah….
Big B needs to fix his door first prior flying
- This concept makes for great viewing but is form a practical engeenering point seriously flawed.
The X-20 control body for starters. It's payload capacity would be so low to make it not worth building.
- And so it wasn't.