CoH2: 4v4 Soviet Panther Ace! (Company of Heroes 2)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2024
  • In this match I managed to steal a German Panther tank and turn it into a soviet ace crew! Enjoy :).
    #coh2 #companyofheroes2 #helpinghans

ความคิดเห็น • 69

  • @legomillions3462
    @legomillions3462 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    must be tuff seeing the other team destroy you with your tank

  • @youdonthavetoknowsssh8154
    @youdonthavetoknowsssh8154 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    "Please don't kill me with my own tank"
    "OUR tank, Hans!"

  • @Supergforce777
    @Supergforce777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lest we forget the sacrifices of our brave T-34 tankers for the rodina o7

  • @undaijoubunii-chan586
    @undaijoubunii-chan586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    MVP panther lmao
    T-34 deserves hero of the Soviet union for that madlad charge

  • @OhNotThat
    @OhNotThat ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's the People's Panther now, a Volkspanther. Glory to the Soviet Union and it's heroic Panther Comrades.

  • @JackBodnar
    @JackBodnar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I remeber I was playing with my friend in 2v2. I was USF. Managed to knock out crew from panther, decrew sherman, place mine under it, crit fixed engine on panther and drove to base and fully repaired. Well, Axis armor is not that bold when USF with good infantry get 3 star Panther as AT support against brumbars, pz 4 and unvettes panthers. Loved every second of using Panther as USF

    • @applejuice90
      @applejuice90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thats why german tank is numbe one. They know allied tank is a joke.

    • @guts-141
      @guts-141 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Allied tanks are superior in numbers
      As the germans said
      Tiger can take on 10 shermans but there's always 11

    • @rosaparks6479
      @rosaparks6479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@guts-141 A tiger can not take on 10 shermans irl, or in game lmao

    • @garlkurzer
      @garlkurzer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@guts-141
      Wehraboo. Let me guess, Soviets didnt use tactics and only threw bodies at Nazis till they ran out of ammo, also they had 1 rifle for 2 soldiers?

    • @aziouss2863
      @aziouss2863 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garlkurzer I mean it is kinda true.
      Not due to some magic or something.
      it is just that the soviets were really bad early in the war cus of daddy Stalin's purges.
      When they got some experienced personnel they were on the attack and when you are attacking you lose quite alot more.
      The defender will always be able to pick many people off as they have both cover and concealment.
      As for the western front, well after the fall of France again the allies were pretty much on the offensive.
      Also, Shermans being the excellent tanks they were having to fight on literally every front of the war meant they were undergunned when they arrived in Europe so they did rely on numbers until better gunned versions arrived.
      It is not a 10 to 1 difference but the allies DID lose many more tanks than the germans.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II

  • @haaansolo8568
    @haaansolo8568 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Panther in allies hands is soooo powerful because finally you have a vehicle that can charge in, eat a few shots and spot for your Jackson/.. ❤

  • @Faheroe
    @Faheroe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Finally Hans feeling what most allied players feel when facing a p4. T34 lucky wipes are far less often than p4 lucky wipes

    • @TheAndresun
      @TheAndresun 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You got stats on this or just emotions?

    • @Faheroe
      @Faheroe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheAndresun Check the raw numbers. T34/76 has less armor, less pen same health, lower cost. Also, it has lower raw accuracy. That is why they are less often. Now If you are talking about statistics check streams, old and new ones. You will see that there are more lucky wipes on the German side than on the allied side

  • @SunferCrazy
    @SunferCrazy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    vet4 Panther and vet5 Stuka destroyed that was a heartbreaking
    Btw nice to play with you im SunferCrazy

  • @manjitahzan9577
    @manjitahzan9577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh, shit. It's been abandoned.
    Proceeds capturing it and turned it into legendary Panther Ace.

  • @topgunz1175
    @topgunz1175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great game ! Thanks for posting Hans.

  • @pantherclone4102
    @pantherclone4102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ja... I meen.. DA

    • @GoodOlKuro
      @GoodOlKuro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I meeen.. да

    • @pantherclone4102
      @pantherclone4102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GoodOlKuro I'M NOT A SPY I SWEAR

  • @tommasopisapia7464
    @tommasopisapia7464 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the fact that this game lasted so long even if the allies won decisively early shows how op the axis are, no way you can recover that game as allies in the same position

    • @KrakenIsMahB
      @KrakenIsMahB 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yesterday Ive been pushed to the base as allie, still won. It is more about how well you face your units against theirs and if your enemy does few mistakes when pushing the front, which they made.

  • @blizzarderper1086
    @blizzarderper1086 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I almost captured a Panther once, but the match ended before I can use it though ;(

  • @istvanszoke381
    @istvanszoke381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If you stole enemy vehicles as OKW, can you possibly upgrade them to vet5?

  • @lameesgafieldien3595
    @lameesgafieldien3595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You need to play with SkippyFX

  • @FazekasPK
    @FazekasPK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There's one thing i do not understand.
    Why do certain people in RTS and MOBA games click the same command 2000 times, when one is enough and yields the same result?

    • @karseltang8624
      @karseltang8624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Every click is a result of new assessment of what is needed currently - the repetition of the same exact command is kinda a way for me to focus on is this command still the best command i can think of for this unit at the moment.
      If things change, a new command will most likely be given with the speed of the repeated click did prior.
      Not the easiest thing to explain... hope it is clear enough

    • @leechoonfai4316
      @leechoonfai4316 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I've encountered instances where some commands were not detected by the game for whatever reason. Hence I click multiple times per action to make sure it was properly executed. I'm no pro but that's why I click multiple times for each command. Applies for most strategy games I've played.

    • @GoodOlKuro
      @GoodOlKuro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      also units often take dumb paths. by clicking multiple times and adjusting the position slightly you can manouver a lot better.

  • @pierrecaesarassyurahtendea5589
    @pierrecaesarassyurahtendea5589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks what happened when Allied got a Panther, too inb4

  • @pixelhunter5709
    @pixelhunter5709 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    when u get fked by your own tank

  • @berserker4940
    @berserker4940 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    imagine if you were a faction that could just build those tanks...

    • @batman6429
      @batman6429 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually there is a faction that can build those tanks!!
      There are 2 but its the same country
      OKW and WEHRMACHT
      To get them you need to upgrade to the last structure and gather a LOT of fuel
      You can also scrap destroyed tanks as OKW to make the process faster
      Good luck!

  • @rockinbird1239
    @rockinbird1239 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    RIP T34

  • @marcotodeschini4290
    @marcotodeschini4290 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why you didnt use your at off mal arty to kill their arty?

  • @internettroll1985
    @internettroll1985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hola buenas noches 😴

    • @INQUISIDOR03
      @INQUISIDOR03 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hola buenas noches 😴

  • @LoyalistHellHound
    @LoyalistHellHound 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THE MAP where you cant win as axis

  • @bencarmine3032
    @bencarmine3032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Lets those who claim the panther is underwelming eat their words.

    • @garlkurzer
      @garlkurzer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Panther is the best medium tank in the game

    • @bencarmine3032
      @bencarmine3032 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garlkurzer yes i agree fully but there are quite a few people who think its not.

    • @aziouss2863
      @aziouss2863 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garlkurzer It is not a medium tank it is a tank destroyer and that pisses me the fuck off.

    • @garlkurzer
      @garlkurzer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@aziouss2863
      Yeah, its ridiculous. The Panther has the same firepower as the IS-2, 160 damage on penetration, even though IS-2 has a 122mm gun and Panther a 76mm gun. IS-2 shoots slower too and costs much more, and it is a tank only 2 commanders can get. Panther also has way more range than IS-2 and is faster. The only advantage IS-2 got is that it has 1040 strength, while Panther got 960 Strength, and it has more Armor, 340 Armor front and 140 Armor at back while Panther got 260 in front and 90 in back.
      It is ridiculous how you can compare Panther to an IS-2 and Panther is way cheaper but waaay better, and IS-2 only wins in 2 aspects

    • @karseltang8624
      @karseltang8624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@garlkurzer IS-2 deals with infantry much better than panther though...

  • @franzzz2145
    @franzzz2145 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice yesterday I captured british churchill. Now challenge for you - play with Polish language.

  • @Ruzaraneh
    @Ruzaraneh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    damn why panther so good in allied hands
    oh right, they didnt have to deal high penetrating 60 range TD lmao~

    • @hitler69
      @hitler69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yea just have to deal with 70 range TDs with even higher penetration instead

    • @Ruzaraneh
      @Ruzaraneh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hitler69 that a doctrine which is rare and also allied can field as many as they can rather than only one in the field..
      quantity > quality

    • @tommasopisapia7464
      @tommasopisapia7464 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      just get a at gun lol what td

  • @yajatsingh2241
    @yajatsingh2241 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ugh i was not the first comment :(