I want to get a second to my old alienware, Daniel, I just got a 980Classified, its bitter than this (I love those huge Videocard) you should watch that gtx580 with 5 fans
Every game you tested consistently used more than 1.5GB of memory. This means the original version of the GTX 580 was handicapped by its own configuration. This card TRULY needs the extra VRAM. And I'd say the performance is GREAT for a GPU that originated in 2010.
PUBG is just an unoptimised piece of garbage that needs a really good CPU more than anything. I run it on an RX 560 and it doesn't play too bad even with that. Graphically it looks pretty average compared to other modern games.
Great video and I'm pretty surprised by the performance! I remember back in the day I chose 2 GTX 560 TI 2 GB cards over a single GTX 580 1.5 GB card. This was also when SLI support was pretty much at its best. Loved having a system that could outperform the current flagship from Nvidia for roughly the same cost, and because of the 2 GB of VRAM, those cards had a pretty good life! I eventually upgraded to a GTX 780 (at the end of Kepler's life when it was cheap) once SLI support started to decline, and one 560 TI wasn't cutting it at 1080p. In hindsight I probably should have gone AMD, but I was coming off of an AMD card (super budget HD 5570 lol) and was put through driver hell.
It truly was gimped one 580 classy out performed a 590 with easy. Now nvidia gimps with memory bandwidth rather than ram like the older series did every new card.(altho 2070 appears to be possibly the first card in awhile that might not actually be that limited by memory and will be the go to card if the performance matches the specs)
Excellent review and performance analysis of the legendary Fermi GTX 580 3g card. I never had the pleasure of owning this card but did get my hands on the EVGA Classified 560ti 448 (twin fan model) Played my games smooth as butter with my then new Sandy i7 2600k. I'm pretty sure my Kepler MSI GTX 660 oc was trading blows with the 580 in the performance charts. When GTX 760 came out, it pretty much sealed the GTX 580's outliers in all games at that time. Thanks F2F for interesting informative video.
The 3 Gb 580 is a beast, I owned the 3Gb GTX 580 Phantom from Gainward and I only swapped it out last year for a 1080 ti. I hope this will last this long as well.
I got these following scores on Firestrike based on the 750 (non and with Ti) : GTX 860M with an i3 4330: GPU = 4090. GTX 860M with an i7 4810MQ: GPU = 4081 Stock, 4549 OC. GTX 750 Non Ti with i3 2100: GPU= 3819 Stock, 4258 OC. Nowhere near your 3GB GTX 580 of 5199 and 5964 since your Classified was crazily overclocked!
Thank you for your great content. I owned an EVGA GTX 580 FTW2 from 2013 to late 2015. The card had one of the best chips with a ASIC near 90 and clocked up to >1100MHz. Sadly it was the 1,5GB version. I sold it for the same price I had bought it in 2013, 85€ shipping included. The watercooler was one of the best I've ever seen. The core never went past the upper 50°C and so my old powersurply from CM with 520W 80+ had to do a hard job. It was paired with a AsRock P67 Pro3 and a I5 2500k @ 4,6GHz. The hole system was watercooled (2xVRM, the chipset, the GPU, the CPU).
Thanks for adding in the asic! Great video. I have that very same card. Haven't had a chance to try it out or bench it yet and I'm happy to have your results to compare to now
Finally a case where 3GB of ram on a card from 2011 was worth having. I'm sure for half of these new games you'd be running into low memory related issues if it was not 3GB
I’ve test the GTX 580 1.5GB and it’s also a beast! Especially the fact that it can actually handle GTA 5 at 1440p without breaking a sweat. Just the VRAM limits the graphic settings from getting turned up it actually crushed 1440p normal settings from my tests!
Lucas Jensen Watch my video and see for yourself. In my video you can see the Vram is maxed out at 1.5 GB in the settings menu. I guess I “cheated” and had the fan speed maxed which sounded like a jet engine. But I wanted to see the cards full potential.
I own the reference gtx480 1536mb vram and boy does it struggle.. vram one main issue, other thing is just out right lack of grunt, speeds aren't fast enough and the lack of cores is another. Some times it will surprise you like shadow of mordor will do well and even battlefield 4 is do able but then other times its just a stuttery mess and sometimes drivers/games updating kinda made it worse (fortnite was one example). I'm glad i down use it any more no wonder why it has the nickname thermi the thing is as hot as the sun haha. Nice to see how a 3gb model 580 would do i didn't even know they made them i thought they was just 1.5gb and the 570gtx was the 1.3gb (which seems a bit backwards considering vrams low enough at 1.5gb and the 480 has more vram). Cool video man
I was just thinking about this channel last night and you uploaded this awesome video with sexy beast of a gpu. Loved it also was that a buick gnx at the beginning or was it a monte carlo
Having owned a 3GB GF114 card (670M), i always felt that other fermi cards were very much limited by their small frame buffers. That card managed to perform well over what the equivalent 1.5GB desktop and mobile card with the same GF114 config despite the much lower clocks... Now translate that to the larger GF110 chip...
Good old Fermi, if you ever decided to go for the moon on a suicide run on a much more common and cheaper card with some extreme modding Fermi tops out around 1.1 to 1.5ghz.
One thing you might consider, if you have the tools... Apparently this series of cards (4*0 and 5*0) had IHS's over them, and another video showed someone de-lidding their GTX 480, applying Conductonaut, and getting a pretty drastic reduction in temperatures. It didn't affect resulting performance all that much, but it would likely have made the card a lot happier.
I’ve done a Delid on the GTX 470, even made a video on it. I failed to remove the old glue which would of helped seat the IHS a bit better. Temps came down, but nothing dramatic. The glue is baked on there. Not sure how I’d get it off without damaging something
I got some benchmarks to share. All in Firestrike. Gtx 960 (+ i5 2500): 7864(graphics), 6403(total) Gtx 960m (+ i7 6700hq): 4693(graphics), 4254(total) HD 6950 (+ i5 2500): 2934(graphics), 2815(total). 3DMark showed a validation error here, likely because I used the beta drivers from March 2016. Maybe I'll rerun the test with the latest stable drivers from Juli 2015.
Achilles heel of 3GB EVGA GTX 580 Classified: 4GB EVGA 960 SSC. Still rocking two of them in SLI on my 4790K build with the following: Intel 4790K with an all core boost clock of 4.4GHz on air Gigabyte Z97X-UD3H-BK (v1.0) motherboard 32GB Crucial Tactical Tracer 1600 DDR3 clocked at 2000 10-10-10-30 1T at stock voltage Zalman CNPS-9900 Max Red LED CPU cooler SanDisk X400 512MB M.2 OS SATA SSD 1TB WD Black Game SATA HDD 2TB WD Black Data SATA HDD Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 windowed case EVGA SuperNova 750 G2 PSU Iiyama 23" XU2390HS-B1 1080p 60Hz IPS monitor Filco 105 key UK ISO Cherry MX black keyboard Logitech Pilot optical mouse Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Not much of a gamer myself, but it's still great for editing videos and playing the odd game. :-)
it's not only a Vram issue that holds this card back but also the gpu's architetture itself,Nvidea moved on kepler to crush more performance out of cuda cores while saving energy. .
Whoa. My 1060 managed +180 on the core and +620 on memory without touching voltages. I never went higher since the restarting of screen kind of scared me lol. Also that power draw though.
Usually a game coming out AFTER a GPU could end up performing less desirable. Why would that not be surprising?before it usually has been take care of with optimizations.
@@cyphaborg6598 3 years isn't a large span of time when you're talking about the life-span of a GPU and graphical jumps in games. my HD7850 can play games just fine that were released in 2015 and that's a 2012 card. Again; it's not surprising that a HIGH END card can run a game that released 3 years after it.
Fermi preforms better than expected and clearly shows why you want a card with as much Vram as possible. I predict that the 7970 will no longer be able to keep up in modern titles in 2 years once the PS5 and Next gen Xbox are out. The Vram needed for gaming at high in 2 years will be around 4-5GB.
Funny thing, this card has survived two 980 TI two classifieds that died on me. My backup that never lets me down. Hopefully the 3000 series will do me better.
Didn't Nvidia add Vulkan support for Fermi in 2017 or something? I don't know if it would bring any performance improvement, but it is supported EDIT: oops my mistake, they added DirectX12
So, my 4gb Zotac GTX 960 (not AMP edition), "stock" core at 1329mhz and 3506mhz memory and OC core at 1469mhz, memory at 3856mhz. -Superposition, 1080p Medium Stock: Score 4607, Avg FPS 34.46, Min 28.20, Max 45.02 OC: Score 5099, Avg FPS 38.14, Min 31.14, Max 50.22 -Valley, Extreme HD Stock: Score 1392, Avg FPS 33.3, Min 19.2, Max 60.3 OC: Score 1531, Avg FPS 36.6, Min 17.8, Max 67.1 I don't have 3DMark, and temps were basically the same. I added 20 mVs to core, going from 1.198V to 1.218V. Can't really give you numbers, but I remember having higher fps at higher settings with GTA V for example, but that's probably because you used the built in benchmark, while I just fuck around. Still, I'm quite sure I get around 10 or more fps on most games that have been benchmarked and that I have played before (RB6S and PUBG mainly). Take that with a grain of salt.
Absolutely love this card I have this card but palit 3gb one and suprsingly I can push 1ghz on core with 1.2milivolts and memory to 2.2ghz but it runs to hot so I run it at 940 mhz
CS-GO/Warframe/Insurgency/H1Z1 some of this games i play i get a smoother FPS with 382.53 around 60fps 59-58 cuz i play with Vsync and with the new one i get around 40-45 with a bit of lag here and there is like a 10fps+- but the mouse for me feels weird with the new one 391.35 but the 382.53 feels smoother for me.
This video is CLASSIFIED as Porn
pure Hentai
It is because the graphics card screams overclock me daddy
I want to get a second to my old alienware, Daniel, I just got a 980Classified, its bitter than this (I love those huge Videocard) you should watch that gtx580 with 5 fans
>Get a 2000W Power Supply
>4 way GTX 580s
>Tell those 1080s to frig off, Randy!
😂
Every game you tested consistently used more than 1.5GB of memory. This means the original version of the GTX 580 was handicapped by its own configuration. This card TRULY needs the extra VRAM. And I'd say the performance is GREAT for a GPU that originated in 2010.
I’m pretty shocked with the numbers this card put down. Would love to compare it with a 1.5 GB model for S & G’s
Think stock Nvidia cards are always handy caped with there limited vram it's part of reasons fine wine is a real thing as time goes on
Damn the PUBG Performance was nice, that VRAM was needed much more than I would have ever thought.
I’m surprised as well.
PUBG is just an unoptimised piece of garbage that needs a really good CPU more than anything. I run it on an RX 560 and it doesn't play too bad even with that. Graphically it looks pretty average compared to other modern games.
PUBG does not like to run on cards with less then 3gb of vram.
pubg mobile, with tencent gaming buddy 1000% better.
@@F2FTech why didn't u OC the GPU for PUBG?
FINALLY
I’m slacking bro 😅
If only the 590 shipped with 6GB VRAM, then that would truly be Fermi's last hope
Holy shit...this card alone draws twice more power than current gen entire builds...xD
I know right . Loves the POWAH!!!!
F2F Tech Yeah haha I bet it would make a top notch toaster as well 😂😂
jonny j Yes it does. My entire pc running a Rx480 8GB draws under 200watts.
this card uses more power than my PC as well.
Not anymore
Great video and I'm pretty surprised by the performance!
I remember back in the day I chose 2 GTX 560 TI 2 GB cards over a single GTX 580 1.5 GB card. This was also when SLI support was pretty much at its best. Loved having a system that could outperform the current flagship from Nvidia for roughly the same cost, and because of the 2 GB of VRAM, those cards had a pretty good life! I eventually upgraded to a GTX 780 (at the end of Kepler's life when it was cheap) once SLI support started to decline, and one 560 TI wasn't cutting it at 1080p. In hindsight I probably should have gone AMD, but I was coming off of an AMD card (super budget HD 5570 lol) and was put through driver hell.
Still running an 7870XT 5.5 years on (cut down 7950 GPU)
@@Loundsify you should oc it! I had mine at 1200 core and it rocked better then 7950 performance!
DAMN, this card is truly the futureproof one. The performance is roughly on pair with current gtx 1050 on my MSI laptop
I totally agree with you about VRAM being the Achilles heel of Fermi. The 580 was/is a pretty good card, but gimped due to the stock 1.5GB of VRAM...
It truly was gimped one 580 classy out performed a 590 with easy. Now nvidia gimps with memory bandwidth rather than ram like the older series did every new card.(altho 2070 appears to be possibly the first card in awhile that might not actually be that limited by memory and will be the go to card if the performance matches the specs)
I've been refreshing youtube waiting for you to upload a video
Man, I hope not ;)
Man! and i thought i was the only one that loves old hardware. Subscribed! Great content sir!
Great video, I still have my 480 GTX, she was a beast back in the day.
I ran 480 SLI all the way until the 980 came out. They had lifespan for sure!
Nice!
Pretty insane performance for an 8 year old card
Damn, this bad boy looks good.
Great content.
Excellent review and performance analysis of the legendary Fermi GTX 580 3g card. I never had the pleasure of owning this card but did get my hands on the EVGA Classified 560ti 448 (twin fan model) Played my games smooth as butter with my then new Sandy i7 2600k. I'm pretty sure my Kepler MSI GTX 660 oc was trading blows with the 580 in the performance charts. When GTX 760 came out, it pretty much sealed the GTX 580's outliers in all games at that time. Thanks F2F for interesting informative video.
The 3 Gb 580 is a beast, I owned the 3Gb GTX 580 Phantom from Gainward and I only swapped it out last year for a 1080 ti. I hope this will last this long as well.
Should i get Amd hd 7850 2gb for budget gaming or the gtx 580 3gb.
@@malcogicianhd6765 rx 470
@@malcogicianhd6765 gtx 580
@@IsrarZarif Too late
@@IsrarZarif I got a Gtx 760 4gb
Love how this boy came out in 2010 and still smacks around the 2013 consoles that at this point are relying on crazy optimisation
I got these following scores on Firestrike based on the 750 (non and with Ti) :
GTX 860M with an i3 4330: GPU = 4090.
GTX 860M with an i7 4810MQ: GPU = 4081 Stock, 4549 OC.
GTX 750 Non Ti with i3 2100: GPU= 3819 Stock, 4258 OC.
Nowhere near your 3GB GTX 580 of 5199 and 5964 since your Classified was crazily overclocked!
Awesome 👏. Thanks for sharing 👍
Thank you for your great content. I owned an EVGA GTX 580 FTW2 from 2013 to late 2015. The card had one of the best chips with a ASIC near 90 and clocked up to >1100MHz. Sadly it was the 1,5GB version. I sold it for the same price I had bought it in 2013, 85€ shipping included. The watercooler was one of the best I've ever seen. The core never went past the upper 50°C and so my old powersurply from CM with 520W 80+ had to do a hard job. It was paired with a AsRock P67 Pro3 and a I5 2500k @ 4,6GHz. The hole system was watercooled (2xVRM, the chipset, the GPU, the CPU).
Thanks for adding in the asic! Great video. I have that very same card. Haven't had a chance to try it out or bench it yet and I'm happy to have your results to compare to now
Superb video Mike, well worth the wait ;) I also hope that was your T-Type at the start of the video :D
Thanks Guido. I wish was...😢
Wow!! A *BEAST* of a Fermi!
Great vid, love the burnout intro! Card seems amazing for its age, if a bit power hungry!
i steel have evga vanila gtx 580 3gb,slight bump to 840mhz and quite amazing card. Exelent video F2F Tech.
Liked for the Grand National intro alone.
Finally a case where 3GB of ram on a card from 2011 was worth having. I'm sure for half of these new games you'd be running into low memory related issues if it was not 3GB
Love this kind of retro videos !!! keep it up !
Intro was DOPE and unexpected
I’ve test the GTX 580 1.5GB and it’s also a beast! Especially the fact that it can actually handle GTA 5 at 1440p without breaking a sweat. Just the VRAM limits the graphic settings from getting turned up it actually crushed 1440p normal settings from my tests!
I really doubt that, 1.5 gb vram is not nearly enough
Lucas Jensen Watch my video and see for yourself. In my video you can see the Vram is maxed out at 1.5 GB in the settings menu. I guess I “cheated” and had the fan speed maxed which sounded like a jet engine. But I wanted to see the cards full potential.
amazing work mind blowing good luck bro
I like these old vs new cards.Well done on the quality content and keep it up
Extremely well made video. My compliments!
Much appreciated
I own the reference gtx480 1536mb vram and boy does it struggle.. vram one main issue, other thing is just out right lack of grunt, speeds aren't fast enough and the lack of cores is another. Some times it will surprise you like shadow of mordor will do well and even battlefield 4 is do able but then other times its just a stuttery mess and sometimes drivers/games updating kinda made it worse (fortnite was one example). I'm glad i down use it any more no wonder why it has the nickname thermi the thing is as hot as the sun haha. Nice to see how a 3gb model 580 would do i didn't even know they made them i thought they was just 1.5gb and the 570gtx was the 1.3gb (which seems a bit backwards considering vrams low enough at 1.5gb and the 480 has more vram). Cool video man
Thanks. I have a 2.5GB GTX 570 as well. Also did a video on the GTX 480 at 1440p.
My GOD PC Porn factor is over the roof!Szch great card,quality material from the 1st second to the last.Really well done editing,congratulations!
Much appreciated sir.
My old rig with an i5 4460 EVGA 750ti SC with a decent OC only hit around 4600-4700 in Firestrike
I was just thinking about this channel last night and you uploaded this awesome video with sexy beast of a gpu. Loved it also was that a buick gnx at the beginning or was it a monte carlo
Thanks bro. It’s a Buick Grand National- one of my favs 😍
@@F2FTech awesome
Great video, covered everything I wanted to know, the video was put together very nicely. Subbed
Closest thing to a Vintage Lamborghini you can get for your PC.
The furnace architecture was hotttt lol
Still is 😉
Having owned a 3GB GF114 card (670M), i always felt that other fermi cards were very much limited by their small frame buffers. That card managed to perform well over what the equivalent 1.5GB desktop and mobile card with the same GF114 config despite the much lower clocks... Now translate that to the larger GF110 chip...
Thats a Power hungry card. Nice Video
It's hungry, it's loud but it was exceptionally fast for the time. Just like that Grand National. It's also black and it even comes with a turbo.
I would post this commant but its classified
I bought this for a $3000 build after coming back from Afghanistan. I miss this beast.
Great analysis as always, you deserve many more subs!
Thank you sir.
Good old Fermi, if you ever decided to go for the moon on a suicide run on a much more common and cheaper card with some extreme modding Fermi tops out around 1.1 to 1.5ghz.
Very fun video, thank you. You should try to get a hold of the 3 GB 660.
Thanks. Thats an OEM card only right?
Yes ive been waiting so long but F2F is back!
I think it's always really fun to go back and see how well these ultra-high end cards can hang now a-days.
One thing you might consider, if you have the tools... Apparently this series of cards (4*0 and 5*0) had IHS's over them, and another video showed someone de-lidding their GTX 480, applying Conductonaut, and getting a pretty drastic reduction in temperatures. It didn't affect resulting performance all that much, but it would likely have made the card a lot happier.
I’ve done a Delid on the GTX 470, even made a video on it. I failed to remove the old glue which would of helped seat the IHS a bit better. Temps came down, but nothing dramatic. The glue is baked on there. Not sure how I’d get it off without damaging something
Ahh.... good ol' thermi ;)
Been waiting for your vid bruh it's like 500 years
Yeah, life has been really busy and .....I’m slow 😕
Your reviews are way more different. It's feels like watching NatGeo or something LOL. keep it up!
I just love this video I have the gtx 580 lightning XE 3gb and I want to know what it's his performance in that many games that I don't have xDD
This card uses more power than all the electronics in my room combines :P
Hey, finally a new video, yay! :)
I can imagine that this card was quite expensive to get, since it probably is a bit rare, isn't it?
Not too hard to find, but they are hard to find for a good price. I grabbed this one for $55 on eBay.
Oh ok, that's not too bad. :)
I got some benchmarks to share. All in Firestrike.
Gtx 960 (+ i5 2500): 7864(graphics), 6403(total)
Gtx 960m (+ i7 6700hq): 4693(graphics), 4254(total)
HD 6950 (+ i5 2500): 2934(graphics), 2815(total). 3DMark showed a validation error here, likely because I used the beta drivers from March 2016. Maybe I'll rerun the test with the latest stable drivers from Juli 2015.
Awesome. Thanks for doing that.
Great Video, I'd like to see you do a 580 quad-sli video also. Thanks
Me too, but that’s big 🤑🤑🤑
the 580 runs like a dream still for its age I would say.
Grand National and Fermi cards in the same video? TAKE MY LIKES
Very good card still in 2019 i miss my old one 😯
Achilles heel of 3GB EVGA GTX 580 Classified: 4GB EVGA 960 SSC.
Still rocking two of them in SLI on my 4790K build with the following:
Intel 4790K with an all core boost clock of 4.4GHz on air
Gigabyte Z97X-UD3H-BK (v1.0) motherboard
32GB Crucial Tactical Tracer 1600 DDR3 clocked at 2000 10-10-10-30 1T at stock voltage
Zalman CNPS-9900 Max Red LED CPU cooler
SanDisk X400 512MB M.2 OS SATA SSD
1TB WD Black Game SATA HDD
2TB WD Black Data SATA HDD
Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 windowed case
EVGA SuperNova 750 G2 PSU
Iiyama 23" XU2390HS-B1 1080p 60Hz IPS monitor
Filco 105 key UK ISO Cherry MX black keyboard
Logitech Pilot optical mouse
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Not much of a gamer myself, but it's still great for editing videos and playing the odd game. :-)
pretty much the same "raw" power as the ps4 (maybe even more)
still a really good card
I see a Grand National...period. I like!
it's not only a Vram issue that holds this card back but also the gpu's architetture itself,Nvidea moved on kepler to crush more performance out of cuda cores while saving energy. .
Whoa. My 1060 managed +180 on the core and +620 on memory without touching voltages. I never went higher since the restarting of screen kind of scared me lol. Also that power draw though.
Great review and video.
5:22 -- It's not the memory fault really. All Fermi GPUs have botched GDDR5 implementation that sets a low ceiling on the memory controller.
Hell yeah brother
OMG that GNX I am not an old car guy but that is the one I would get. Do you have any videos on that?
Unfortunately no...
A card Buildzoid would love to check.
Damn , whomever had 2600k gtx580 3gb is still enjoying good gaming experience 10 years later.
this would have been insane in its day i remember gaming on a dual core and 512 meg gpu around this time with 4 gig ram and was happy
2nd gen Fermi isn't as bad as people think it is. It might've ran hot but it was a solid architecture.
I wanted this card so much. But ended up with the non classified 3gb model.
What? What a fvck? Conslole eyes? PC gamers eyes able to see up to 420 frames per second)
😂 joking bro 😉
A 2010-2011 card doing well in 2018. Not bad at all. If someone sold it to me for a good 20 to 30 bucks id take it just to play around with it.
Sadly they go for about $100. Although the 1.5gb version hovers around $40-50
GTA V came out 3 years after the card so it's not a huge surprise it runs so well.
Usually a game coming out AFTER a GPU could end up performing less desirable.
Why would that not be surprising?before it usually has been take care of with optimizations.
@@cyphaborg6598 3 years isn't a large span of time when you're talking about the life-span of a GPU and graphical jumps in games. my HD7850 can play games just fine that were released in 2015 and that's a 2012 card. Again; it's not surprising that a HIGH END card can run a game that released 3 years after it.
I skipped the 680 and held off for a 780. The 580 was sweet.
Running this card in 4-way SLI would be just turning your PC into a freaking forge
The same one used to make Thor’s Axe
im still using gtx 580 1,5 gb and im happy untiy 2022
Monster
damn i screaming at that drawing power
Bought one of theese for 150$ on ebay, and yes i'm surprised on how it holds up.
Impressive performance.
Fermi preforms better than expected and clearly shows why you want a card with as much Vram as possible. I predict that the 7970 will no longer be able to keep up in modern titles in 2 years once the PS5 and Next gen Xbox are out. The Vram needed for gaming at high in 2 years will be around 4-5GB.
Or just faster memory
I'd say for 4k you need at least 12GB but 8 is efficient enough.
if you use HBM2 with HBCC you only need 8GB.
Funny thing, this card has survived two 980 TI two classifieds that died on me. My backup that never lets me down. Hopefully the 3000 series will do me better.
Didn't Nvidia add Vulkan support for Fermi in 2017 or something?
I don't know if it would bring any performance improvement, but it is supported
EDIT: oops my mistake, they added DirectX12
Bro how did I miss this.
Not sure? A friend of mine didn’t get the notification either?
13:24 7970 Gang!
That GN tho..............
😍
Yes it should be the official opener to all of his vids.
So, my 4gb Zotac GTX 960 (not AMP edition), "stock" core at 1329mhz and 3506mhz memory and OC core at 1469mhz, memory at 3856mhz.
-Superposition, 1080p Medium
Stock: Score 4607, Avg FPS 34.46, Min 28.20, Max 45.02
OC: Score 5099, Avg FPS 38.14, Min 31.14, Max 50.22
-Valley, Extreme HD
Stock: Score 1392, Avg FPS 33.3, Min 19.2, Max 60.3
OC: Score 1531, Avg FPS 36.6, Min 17.8, Max 67.1
I don't have 3DMark, and temps were basically the same. I added 20 mVs to core, going from 1.198V to 1.218V.
Can't really give you numbers, but I remember having higher fps at higher settings with GTA V for example, but that's probably because you used the built in benchmark, while I just fuck around. Still, I'm quite sure I get around 10 or more fps on most games that have been benchmarked and that I have played before (RB6S and PUBG mainly). Take that with a grain of salt.
wow this is quite impressive for an aging card
Good ole Gbody intro.
Oh yeah. Love me some Gbody cars.
wonderful video
Absolutely love this card I have this card but palit 3gb one and suprsingly I can push 1ghz on core with 1.2milivolts and memory to 2.2ghz but it runs to hot so I run it at 940 mhz
Id like to see an OC GTX 580 vs RX 580 :)
We need comparison video of old card ,,😄
The Nvidia 382.53 driver is working much better than new one even if its older than 391.35 i did test it :P
How much are we talking here? Also, in what games?
CS-GO/Warframe/Insurgency/H1Z1 some of this games i play i get a smoother FPS with 382.53 around 60fps 59-58 cuz i play with Vsync and with the new one i get around 40-45 with a bit of lag here and there is like a 10fps+- but the mouse for me feels weird with the new one 391.35 but the 382.53 feels smoother for me.
Fermi's Last Hope ... tha mustag ultra ... hope that it will be in still 2031 ok and enough
at least for hd ready . MARK 2011 !!!