IS IWC A SHIITER WATCH BRAND ?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 96

  • @robcucchi1805
    @robcucchi1805 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    There is no issue with eta movements. I've had many and still do and they have never been a problem. I do however agree that watches that use eta movements even heavily modified shouldn't charge some of the prices they do unless precious metals

  • @DisabilityExams
    @DisabilityExams 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I gotta tell you - my dog had a bowel movement today, I put it on a brown vinyl tray and popped it in the microwave - when it was done - it bore a striking resemblance to an IWC!

    • @tomy8339
      @tomy8339 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good grief, such hate! Love, don't hate.

  • @iain777uk
    @iain777uk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think its great when AC3 tells you a bit of history of watch brands.

  • @mfmf100
    @mfmf100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Why is Zenith a second tier brand if they make movements for first tier brands?

    • @andyreiter6253
      @andyreiter6253 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      mfmf100 ahah which universe do u live in ? They 70 are over man ... today zenith sadly is a second tier ... their designs their prestige are on a level of Tag Heuer ... sadly

    • @SP-qi8ur
      @SP-qi8ur 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andyreiter6253 wym by "70 over"?

  • @WhatIsItReallyAbout
    @WhatIsItReallyAbout 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    IWC... Invicta Watch Company?

  • @jigrodrigues
    @jigrodrigues 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    IWC again? We want something fresh! For instance, would you recommend the Rolex Explorer II 40mm with a white dial? Is it good bang per buck?

    • @timderl4311
      @timderl4311 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have never seen him mention anything on Patek either. Would like to see something on Patek from arch. I have taken an interest to the world time and would be great if he could cover it?

    • @michaelmadsen2268
      @michaelmadsen2268 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      jigrodrigues ugly shit man dont get that crap buy an omega instead or a new ss cartier santos

    • @michaelmadsen2268
      @michaelmadsen2268 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, a rolex explorer doesnt even look much like a rolex it can be confused with a seiko or some other shit

    • @michaelmadsen2268
      @michaelmadsen2268 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It looks like an old swiss army to say the truth

    • @andyreiter6253
      @andyreiter6253 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tim Derl he doesn’t know shit about high end pieces like Patek ... especially when it comes to the complicated ones ...

  • @mr.c1580
    @mr.c1580 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Buyers remorse to the next level!
    Sell it on ebay!

  • @menaseven9093
    @menaseven9093 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    IWC makes beautiful watches like the Grande Complication, the da Vinci, the Portuguese, the Ingeneer and the Aquanaut.

    • @pow4low
      @pow4low 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aquatimer?

  • @stephenmiller1958
    @stephenmiller1958 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Every time Archie coughs colonic leaks of ice cream stain his chair....

  • @VB-3
    @VB-3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Typically these high end brands are not simply using an off the shelf movement. They are typically highly modified for the job. These companies have a wealth of heritage as well. Is it Rolex? Nothing is. You have to leap frog to Patek and AP.

  • @nautaki
    @nautaki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know this is an old video but the argument is still going strong. Is Pagani rubbish because they use a Mercedes engine in their Zonda's?

  • @rbf100
    @rbf100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    IWC with in-house Pelaton movement is a great watch and relatively easy to service.

  • @BobbyDazzler888
    @BobbyDazzler888 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ok my final offer, 1100 AUD. Not a dollar more. I need a watch for when im panel beating my isuzu shitbox

  • @csaREEM
    @csaREEM 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Seiko is more prestigious and at least have in house movements

  • @jefboy28
    @jefboy28 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the crow at 4:05 sounds hungry.

  • @nejjk
    @nejjk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Really? Another video on this? Don't you have a leaky roof to fix?

  • @andyreiter6253
    @andyreiter6253 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love watching this guy ... I never know if he is mental or a good actor ... Because the things he says are quite intellectual but the way he says it it’s almost like he is joking ... or a degenerate !

  • @CWL12
    @CWL12 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    is IWC a shiiter brand?? Is AC3 a minotaur?? :( :(

    • @DisabilityExams
      @DisabilityExams 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think he's a shirime!

    • @DisabilityExams
      @DisabilityExams 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Charles Lewis mythical Japanese creature - has an eye where it's anus would be, from the Japanese "shiri" - "ass", "me" - "eye".

    • @CWL12
      @CWL12 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have done some research and Im going to have to agree with you JDave. He definitely has some shirime in him - perhaps a hybrid of some sort?

    • @DisabilityExams
      @DisabilityExams 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Charles Lewis quite likely, as your shirime possesses neither horns nor luxury wrist watch. AC3 may be some sort of hybrid or chimera!

  • @Zeddington
    @Zeddington 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Archie's horns are writing cheques (checks) for shitter watches that banks won't cash.

  • @WreckedRectum
    @WreckedRectum 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, IWC isn’t a shitter brand and doesn’t make shitter watches because they did something of note way back when. Ok, if we can accept that logic, then why does Paul think Longines is a shitter brand? They make watches with outsourced movements, just like IWC, but they also have a much - MUCH - more significant history in horology. Either he is justifying his IWC which he deep down thinks is a shitter or he thinks Longines are at least at the same level as IWC. I think it is the former.

  • @CaptainZed
    @CaptainZed 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I would take the IWC over the MOTM frankly

    • @andyreiter6253
      @andyreiter6253 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      G Miyata I don’t understand man on the moon it’s big it’s ugly it has a 40 year old movement if not 50 .. it’s hand wound it has a plastic glass ... it has no date ... and it’s an omega not a top brand like jlc Breguet ... so can somebody explain?

  • @ScottyBennitone
    @ScottyBennitone 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I lke the ingenieuer with the slim profile case , 10mm . Not that thick chunky one . Just my 2 cents

  • @JohnSmith-ve8pd
    @JohnSmith-ve8pd 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice one bud, that burger looked alright. Enjoy the trip

  • @JeffJohnson-gq1yl
    @JeffJohnson-gq1yl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    More high quality, luxury filler from youtube sensation & luxury guru, AC3

  • @michelemariotti8198
    @michelemariotti8198 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make a video about the Speedmaser caliber 9300? I think it's the most iconic Speedy EVER

  • @ariakowsarian9057
    @ariakowsarian9057 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is a shitter indeed, one of a few examples of how you can buy a SHITTER with a high price

  • @dazdance100
    @dazdance100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In a word, no.

  • @michaelmadsen2268
    @michaelmadsen2268 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Archie you where talking bout new brands what does it matter if its a new brand or not look at richard mille fairly new and are kicking the shit out of every watchmakers

  • @Aidy-d
    @Aidy-d 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is his white balance off or is he jaundice?

  • @dagsabot5589
    @dagsabot5589 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wear a tie, don't get into watches.

  • @philipm06
    @philipm06 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's that head on his lump?

  • @nunomc2815
    @nunomc2815 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    NO, that’s an absurd ! just 2 seconds to say what you said in 10’

  • @timderl4311
    @timderl4311 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, yes it is

  • @ronnypaul1400
    @ronnypaul1400 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ok, here it is plain and simple, I'm gonna give you a scenario that is self explanatory as to which watch is deemed a shitter, and which is deemed value. You, AC3, walk into an expensive steakhouse. You order up the 12 oz rib-eye with all the trimming, a $500 bottle of wine, and desert. At the end of the meal, the waiter presents you the bill for $750. You reach into your pocket for your wallet and realize you left it at home. You have a dilemma on your hands. The waiter looks at you disapprovingly and quite upset. So...........................you pull out all 5 watches from your collection and place them on the table in front of you. You look at the waiter and say to him "Look, I'm a goof...........I forgot my wallet at home..............which watch from my collection will you take as collateral so's I can run home and get my wallet and pay you???"
    With the waiter's limited knowledge in watches, which one do you think he's going to pick??????????
    That my friend, is a brand that is of value, and recognized, and will NEVER be a shitter and you can NEVER go wrong with.

    • @JohnstonPettigrew
      @JohnstonPettigrew 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yeah, the only problem is that the waiter and then the manager take one look at this guy Puto (or Andy Cunter for that matter)............and all are presumed copies from the Philippine factory pounding them out for 79.90 USD.........so both of them end up washing dishes......after blowing two cops and a the busboy.......

    • @rosshilton
      @rosshilton 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      True story:
      Late 70s and my GF is running the pumps at a small petrol station. Some guy comes in with a jag, fills up then finds he doesn’t have his wallet on him. He whips off his watch and leaves it as security while he goes home.
      The watch? A solid gold Rolex President.
      Sadly he came back later, paid his bill and took his watch.

  • @andrewbrown5636
    @andrewbrown5636 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    If IWC is shit, what about Omega and Breitling..they must also be shitters

  • @BisonNews1
    @BisonNews1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't you do this video the other day? Way to beat a dead horse!

  • @chucklai44
    @chucklai44 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's not a shitter... but it's very bland to me. I rate it beneath Omega. A step above Breitling. The Portuguese is the only one worth getting. Those pilot watches are nothing to write home about.

  • @hcavn
    @hcavn 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    IS IWC A SHIITER WATCH BRAND?
    Do bears shit in the woods?

  • @drake8065
    @drake8065 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol. good one Arch

  • @michaelmadsen2268
    @michaelmadsen2268 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lol schfenhausen

  • @SevenDeMagnus
    @SevenDeMagnus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. Not a fan of IWC, nor their name.

  • @DougieFresh13
    @DougieFresh13 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who in there non cracked out mind is paying full wack for an iwc?

  • @minnesotafretswithmartybei5890
    @minnesotafretswithmartybei5890 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Archie!

  • @kellyrobinson550
    @kellyrobinson550 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shit attracts shit boy!!!!!!

  • @eddieo9195
    @eddieo9195 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is now as of 11-2018... LOL

  • @snowcountry322
    @snowcountry322 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need some water...

  • @joziedude7131
    @joziedude7131 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats growing out the sides of his head????

    • @DougieFresh13
      @DougieFresh13 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      His horns. New around here huh?

  • @vladamirkb1
    @vladamirkb1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shitter shitter chicken dinner.

  • @starwarsfanatic127
    @starwarsfanatic127 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes its super shitter!

  • @wimviaene4153
    @wimviaene4153 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    expensive shitter, lots of eta movements used

  • @lamer1805
    @lamer1805 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    IWC is so overrated

  • @ronnypaul1400
    @ronnypaul1400 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    YES, IWC IS A SHITTER BRAND....................................for the last time.

  • @michaelmadsen2268
    @michaelmadsen2268 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    iwc, breitling, tudor... look too simple they don't say anything

  • @markbojanjac6805
    @markbojanjac6805 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    great brand & movement - shit design.

  • @treedillinger5801
    @treedillinger5801 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Phirst

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This shit is so classic lol