This Silent Climate Threat Is Quietly Pushing Humanity To Apocalypse
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- This Silent Climate Threat Is Quietly Pushing Humanity To Apocalypse
Dive into the unseen dangers shaping our world in this eye-opening video. Uncover the critical role of carbon dioxide as it becomes increasingly more potent in warming the planet than previously thought, trapping more heat with the same proportionate increase compared to the past.
From the escalating impact of climate change to the daunting challenge of keeping global temperatures below 1.5 degrees Celsius, discover the urgency of the situation and the potential for catastrophic consequences.
But that's not all. Discover how the melting of permafrost combined with the newly discovered role of carbon dioxide creates a snowball effect of warming.
Witness the urgency of addressing these interconnected issues and the potentially catastrophic consequences for our planet.
Sources:
news.mit.edu/2...
www.nature.com...
newsroom.ucla....
courses.seas.h...
e360.yale.edu/...
climate.nasa.g...
sigmaearth.com...
arctic.noaa.go....
www.scientific...
For business: contactre365@gmail.com
#climatechange #globalwarming #carbonremoval #environment #climateaction #revolutionaryengineering #apocalypse #crisismanagement #cop28
☕️ SUPPORT
►Buy me a coffee: www.buymeacoff...
Products that you might find useful (affiliate links):
Wall Mounted Infrared Heater:
amzn.to/3u6mAi7
Nexus Portable Power Station:
amzn.to/3MJPVW5
Gas Furnace & Air Conditioner System:
bit.ly/3SHAaTC
Ecobee3 Lite Smart Thermostat:
amzn.to/3QWZFyG
Sense Energy Monitor:
amzn.to/3szAaKC
Dyson Pure Cool HEPA Air Purifier:
amzn.to/47uslon
Greenworks 40V 16" Brushless Cordless Chainsaw:
amzn.to/3MWUQ6d
Hahahaha, all the buzzwords. Riddle me this. We're coming out of the last ice age. How do you come out of an ice age without Heat? Boy, our colleges are failing us on a global scale.
Mate the last ice age started to end before civilization existed, you do understand that when they say "we're just coming out of an ice age", it's in geological terms stretching back hundreds of millions of years of life on Earth?
I don't even know why I'm asking, you're probably not even sentient with that sloganeering 😛 mate, nobody crosses their arms and says "the earth is warming", they say it's warming 'rapidly' and we are in a mass extinction event.
The mass extinction event gets going around mid October 2046, but there’ll be X-class solar flares knocking out global electricity systems before then, we just missed one last March, bigger than the Carrington event. Diehold foundation, series 4: watch them all, all of them.
@@freeforester1717 Okay, how many people died in the Carrington Event then?
Why would you worry about blackouts or even electronics literally exploding like in Goldeneye, when we already have mass extinction events that throw tidal waves of fire through entire countries like with giant asteroids?
@@jedcollings3624 The last Ice Age only ended 10,000 years ago. The blink of an eye in geological time. Also , scientists referring to global warming 1.5 C above pre-industrial times seems to mean from when the Little Ice Age was waning. I mean, we are lucky it is warmer.
I found a snowball, checkmate atheists.
The effect of CO2 is non linear,it reduces logarithmically. In other words if an increase from 200 ppm to 400 ppm were to increase temperature by 1 C then it would take an increase from 400 to 800 to take it another degree. It’s all moot anyway because the Warming is natural and anyone who has ever bothered to study History can clearly see that we are simply recovering from the Maunder Minimum,1600-1725 when Solar Radiation dropped dramatically as is well chronicled.
It’s also moot because by 2046 it’ll be all over. The warming has indeed nothing to do with man-made carbon dioxide levels, it is an indication of the warming being driven by this the last of 316 Gleissberg cycles since the last solar nova and ensuing ice age. The recently passed Doug Vogt elegantly explains it all, see Diehold Foundation, series 4. Watch them all. All of them. 😊
@geoffevans4908 typed " Warming is natural recovering from the Maunder Minimum,1600-1725 " @geoffevans4908 == Ho hum really really ordinary Standard Parrot-Imbecile (so very different from the Parrot Imbeciles of 15 years ago of my fond memory). Can't swing a cat by the tail any place without hitting a dozen lumps of muck you get stuck on your shoe masquerading as actual humans. Earth globally (GLOBALLY) GMST for 24,000 years ago until 2010 CE is shown at th-cam.com/video/CqtZdnpfgIc/w-d-xo.html at 5:55, 6:05 and 7:00
you are one of these New Climate Change Deniers. "it's all moot...." how do you know that? These sweeping statements with no evidence show you are a liar.
Well, we're still coming out of the last ice age, so there is that...... Ironic, when the CO2 was highest in earth's past is when there was the most life and the diverse life! Weird....
You might want to check out the sea level when CO2 was very high in the past. I believe there was a point in the Miocene when CO2 was high. At that sea level all our major coastal cities would be well under water. Maybe you have enough imagination to see what that would do to our civilization now.
When CO2 was highest, 02 levels were also lowest, and while life was abundant and diverse, natural selection pressure was for smaller, less O2 hungry brains, such as those found in cephalopods, arthropods, and birds (dinosaurs). Not mammals, and certainly not us. So we are terraforming the planet into a hot-house climate state, that will potentially support all sorts of life, just not us, and not mammals in general.
At this point I envy everyone out there that does not believe in climate change who lives in denial.😊 when the truth comes out and people realize what is actually happening life will not be as pleasant😢
Almost every speech about global warming & CO2, claiming "it's disastrous", is bullshit.
Food abondance and at low prices will come with higher temperatures and more CO2 content in the lower atmosphere.
.
@billyjoesmo8251 Oh, I believe in climate change.... Just not the BS that is being spewed today! You realize 40 to 50 years ago.... climate change was happening as we were going to see GLOBAL COOLING....Also, destroying the ozone...
Many scientists have recently come put and admitted that GW is mostly a large hoax!
Think... do some research....
The WEF... great reset...
It is not a conspiracy, it's all publicly available!
Actually, climate scientists did not put forth thec1.5 c limite. That was some damn economist.
I love it.. Those damned economists!
that just doesn't make sense
@@AndTecks yes. You're right.
Heating, cooling, What does the Word Of GOD say ? Destroyed by fire. So, what is this, then ?
Professor Dilly says that Gravitation Cycles are the main cause of the warming and he says the warming has already started to reverse at the poles (record low temperatures have been recorded in the past couple of years) . He expects global temperatures to decrease for the next few decades as does Martin Armstrong and his AI computer model.
Never heard of Professor Dilly. Better read more widely about the causes of the warming, if you want to understand where the Earth is headed.
This planet is headed towards a massive cooling and as the AMOC shuts down we can only watch the ice builds, just as it always has.
exactly.
No. The Holocene is over my friend. We are in a new age now The Anthropocene. Any cooling due to Malenkovich cycles is swamped now by GHGs emitted by us humans. Your phrase "just as it always has" is a false assumption. This situation is totally different from what it has "always" been. (There never was an "always" either, even without human induced climate change.) And if the AMOC shuts down, watch out. It would be catastrophic for our civilization.
@@russmarkham2197 the amoc is freshening up with melt water 💦 and is shutting down just as it always has over the past gazillion years, yes it is a cyclical event.
@@yoyomawh4091 Indeed it might shut down sometime soon. That is not good news for us however. in fact to be very plain in case you misunderstand, it would be very bad news indeed for us. Certainly it should encourage us to reduce our CO2 emissions. I get the feeling that many people who comment here on climate change have swallowed the propaganda of the fossil fuel industry. Hope that is not the case for you.
@@russmarkham2197 and “ just as it always has “ been there will be those who attack, demonize and impose their beliefs on others. You follow your signenz and I will follow the other science not financed by governments
Thank goodness none of this is true.
credit to this for sounding the alarm. The explanations are a bit simplified. Even if the CO2 greenhouse effect is linear, the result is not very different. As for removing CO2 from the atmosphere at scale, it is not going to happen in time to save us. The cost is in the trillions.
What about biochar? I have noticed that three years of high rainfall on the island of Key Largo has caused quite a lot of dead wood and other plant material to be produced, die and accumulate. The idea of reforesting the Sahara sounds great, but eventually you have to do something with dead wood to stop it from decomposing and producing methane. If it is turned into charcoal, then it can't do that.
I like it. And not only because it makes me nostalgic about my own gourmet cooking.
So what is the biggest pollution maker on the planet??????
I think I spoke to this guy on a phone call from another Scam site.
We went by 1.5c about three years ago
Nope.
Gut
1.5C has no bearing in science. It is an arbitrarily selected number. Get a grip.
Nice title. And they call you people alarmists. Go figure.
Thankyou for this video. I didn't know that the effect of atmospheric CO2 was so non-linear. That is very alarming.
Je Violetter er wird der Himmel je Kälter es wird im Sommer. Im Winter Regnet es bei Extremen Minusgraden.
Je Röter der Himmel ist desto wärmer Wird der Sommer, der Winter wird Der Frost Heißer.
Try the Tribulation driven by SIN.
Poor use of the word Snowball.
Your usage is 'Snowball effect' in common conversation. Climate science uses cascade or tipping point for the same meaning.
Snowball in climate science is the OPPOSITE of hothouse earth. And some theories propose that hothouse could trigger snowball.
It is in that context only did I watch this episode and that was not your meaning.
Other than that, great presentation, apart from the fact we hit 1.5 by the end of 2023 and it will likely never come back down. IPCC is wildly out of date with poor science compared to our real cutting edge such as James Hansen's 'Global Warming in the Pipeline.' paper.
I thought it was a comical little choice even though "snowball effect" is used for exactly that in English. A British person would have understood to use a different phrase for this topic, like "compounding" is good enough.
Gesundes neuers Jahr
Garbage in.....Garbage out.
The voice and accent doesn't go with the face 🌝
5:35 sinking co2 in the oceans will increase acidity and is a really bad idea.
The better idea is that organic carbon sinks to the ocean floor as large molecules, not as CO2 dissolved in the water
@@russmarkham2197 by what method is that practical?
@@biomechanique6874 Good question. I don't know how we could make more carbon sink to the ocean floor.
@@russmarkham2197 solid carbon is not going to affect the atmosphere in same way as co2 gas.
Mother earth will balance things out, carbon is not the menace it's being made out to be.
Perfekt
Der Planet wird wieder
Hervorragend
Schön
Sehr gut
Schwach, AI quatsch.
Back in the 70's there was big talk in USA about reducing world population - politically incorrect if you were running for office, so the movement went nowhere (as far as I know). 50 years later, the worst effect on global carbon release has been due to increase of population. The FASTEST possible reduction of the temperature rise is in step with human population DECREASE, and I would bet it is 100 times more powerful than anything else being discussed. I bet it is 1000 times more powerful by applying strong incentive to reduce population.
And which countries are the worst for increasing human population? Which races? Which religions? Which form of government, democracy or dictatorships? Let's be talking about these things. Let's get real about the carbon problem, if VOLCANOES are not the worst factor, and if the sun is not changing weather on Mars and Jupiter. I think we have many problems and we need to prepare for disaster.
But no, people mainly want to be empiring their own immediate DNA on Earth, owning multiple McMansions, NOT farming to sustain a village in addition to our own dinner table and priority sex pursuits.
But think deeper now. Even your own grand-kids feel like someone else's family, face it, you don't have immortality and TOP DOG EMPIRE in any way, except ego fantasy. It is all folly built into the DNA mandates over the mind. The day will come when viable DNA chains can be 3-D printed, thus, any child you think of as being your own COULD BE copied by 3-D printing of the genetic code. I could 3-D print a zygote, using table scrap atoms, that is identical to your own child. Unique codes will be built this way, and NONE of them can anymore be thought of as part of our own DNA empire on Earth - except in the way you think your 1966 Ford Mustang is immortal and important. Ego empires are destructive. DNA empires are stupid and destructive. Over-population is stupid and destructive. If we can't stop ourselves from destroying the Earth, we are by definition stupid and destructive to excess. Who is responsible? What should we do to actually save MASSIVE DISASTER from happening? We need to stop over-replicating. We need to be sterilized and shift to 3-D printing. At low population count, forever on Earth.
There are races on Earth, entrenched in religion and hate, that will NEVER genuinely work to save the Earth - they will work to exterminate everyone different from themselves. LIke fire ants. They are proud of it, and dedicated to making their sick parents love them, proud of them. It is all folly - it isn't true intelligence. It is evil and stupid.
Reducing human population on Earth by 1/8 would bring all commodity prices down drastically, for one thing. But the real solution is to make possession of MONEY and rental property a crime, while demonstration of TRUE PRODUCTIVITY in excess to help others is the claim to freedom and one's own life. No exceptions except for incapacity. No more billionaires. No more empires other than universities, and free tuition, based on expectation to produce in excess to help others, even if meaning you perform TRUE labor to build more universities, etc.
Is that a poorly incentivized world? Yes, probably, BUT that problem of poor incentive is proof that we are defective in role of "homo sapiens" ruling the Earth. The carbon complainers ARE NOT going to stop using air-conditioning and cars. So let's ALL SHUT UP about carbon warming UNLESS we are all dedicated to reducing human population on Earth by AT LEAST 1/8 in the next 30 years.
Believing that there will be life on Earth in 30 years is really special😅
The USA was thinking of reducing Earth's human population in the 1970s you say. Can't say as it surprises me really. It's always seemed that the USAians are making an effort to reduce human populations, often even starting with random bunches of their own population, anybody within rifle shot range basically.
Why don't you start reducing human population from yourself ? " one small step for a man..."