Martin Heidegger - Contributions to Philosophy (1/7)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ค. 2024
- Contributions was written over the years 1936-38 and is a collection of Heidegger's notes/thoughts about beyng. As such, it was not written systematically from start to finish and lacks the polish of a book written explicitly for publication. Nevertheless, it is the first 'big picture' overview of Heidegger's post-Being and Time thought and therefore indispensable reading for the student of Heidegger.
In this video, I introduce Contributions and briefly discuss some general ideas Heidegger raises; including systems, technology, Being and Time, de-cision, negation, and two ways of thinking.
Website: www.absurdbeing.com
Twitter: / absurdbeing
Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=84430098
![Rick Roderick on Heidegger - The Rejection of Humanism [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sDqDJJcJAOg/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey brother. Nice to see you come back.
Thanks Vladimir. It's good to be back. Hope you enjoy this new series.
Hey bud! Great to see you back...don't be a stranger, love hearing your thoughts so keep em coming! Best, Zeb
Thanks Zeb! I'm reading Concluding Unscientific Postscript at the moment... and loving it! So many parallels between this and Heidegger - I never realised just how much Heidegger was inspired by Kierkegaard.
@@absurdbeing2219 I knew you would mate ;)
@@zeb358 By the way, how is the PhD going?
@@absurdbeing2219 Going well...i'll be conducting my first pilot study interview next month. Interview of an existential oriented therapist on pessimism experienced as a phenomena in a therapeutic encounter with a client. I'm using Max Van Manen's Phenomenology of Practice.
@@zeb358 Awesome. Looking forward to hearing how that progresses and where your thought takes you.
Hello, Absurd Being! Is it possible to understand Contributions to Philosophy without having studied Being and Time? Enjoying your videos!
Hi Richard. In theory, yes. Heidegger's post B&T writings do, strictly speaking, chart different territory, but B&T is a better introduction to Heidegger's way of thinking. Without some prior feel for Heidegger's philosophy, I think Contributions might be a tough read.
Start with Heidegger's work "History of the Concept of Time" -- it's a more accessible (and I think interesting) early 'version' of Being and Time.
Extremely helpful! Thank you. :)
Thanks Allison. Welcome to the channel.
would have helped if you;d explain if this was the FIRST time or not that he used the spelling Beying...
Good time to start the Beitrage the old lockdown ta
True - silver linings...
Thanks for the definitions they were useful shortcuts as I went through the text. For me the ‘disposition of restraint’ seems key to what Heidegger is thinking as ereignis. Your point in the last session about humans being disposed towards the gods and the moods they impose helps to a degree. How restraint sets up a world for humans I suppose is what he thinks by earth. So I guess earth is a mood. It also occurred that transporting only seems another word for ecastasis. Anyway thanks again.
@@lastruebeliever Thanks. Good to hear you made it through unscathed.
I agree about restraint, which is necessary to understand the way beyng withdraws and conceals itself.
I didn't see earth as a mood, but I did see it as important for setting up a world (the two coming together in strife). Heidegger talks more about both of these terms (surprisingly quite lucidly) in _The Origin of the Work of Art,_ if you haven't already read this.
That's a good point about transporting being ecstasis, too. I think you're probably right about that.
Earth is recalcitrant, withdrawn, that’s the sense I had of it and the link I made with the disposition of restraint.
Absurd Being Had a look at OWA. Imo the temple founds the world of the gods and people, in its strife with the dispositional restraint of earth - the event of the truth of being for the Greeks revealed in the work of art. Thanks for the tip!
You missed an opportunity to say Beingy
Ha, I'll try to work it in one day...