The Gay Science #1: What Advances the Species (Preface, I.1 - I.9)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
  • A complete analysis of The Gay Science begins today with an examination of the preface and a breakdown of the beginning of book I, along with some brief remarks on the background of the work and its context within Nietzsche's broader canon.
    buy my book: www.blackrosew...
    Support the show on Patreon: / untimelyreflections
    #nietzsche #thenietzschepodcast #philosophypodcast #history #historyofphilosophy #psychology #metaphysics #schopenhauer #kant #hegel #germanidealism

ความคิดเห็น • 124

  • @wheenishere
    @wheenishere หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    Nietzsches skull shape is verily industrious, like an art deco locomotive

    • @philalethes216
      @philalethes216 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Love this comment.

    • @Villainilla
      @Villainilla หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Very cool to see you here :D

    • @nicoledickens2366
      @nicoledickens2366 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are my favorite person on the planet today! Art deco locomotive...😂🙃☺️

    • @ViVeriVniversvmVivusVici
      @ViVeriVniversvmVivusVici หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I always thought I had the facial structure of a racecar so it's good to know I'm not the only weirdo.

    • @jasonshapiro9469
      @jasonshapiro9469 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      His skull even looks like it hurt..

  • @LoganardoDVinci
    @LoganardoDVinci หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Let's goooo!
    I literally searched for this yesterday, then remembered it didn't exist yet 🤔 But here we are! Thanks Keegan!

  • @whoaitstiger
    @whoaitstiger หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    "Well you'll like this one, it's called the Gay Science..."
    "I'm sorry, the _what_ science?"
    "Well if the title doesn't appeal to you, perhaps you should start with his autobiography..."
    "Alright then, what's that called?"
    "On second thought, never mind..."

    • @willchristie2650
      @willchristie2650 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Gay as in Joyful, if the 21st century sexual use of the word triggers you.

    • @WAZZA1235
      @WAZZA1235 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@willchristie2650 Humour dude, he is doing that silly little thing called humour.

  • @tavze1623
    @tavze1623 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This episode is the most golden one yet. No wonder why it’s called the gay science, it’s like basking in sunshine

  • @csabas.6342
    @csabas.6342 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Me: - Reading Beyond Good and Evil with the podcast commentary was a taxing and challenging task, which was as stressfull as enlightening and fulfilling. Now it is finally time to take some rest and move away from Nietzsche for a while to get things settled.
    Opens up youtube: - Oh no...

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Never let yourself become weary my friend! Come, take my hand! It’s time for another adventure!

  • @maximilianthiel8485
    @maximilianthiel8485 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just in time for work as my holidays are over …. Thanks a lot

  • @melissasmind2846
    @melissasmind2846 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saturday afternoon practicing my natural skincare rituals outside on my porch & listening. Absolutely perfect. Thank you, Sir.

  • @damin1916
    @damin1916 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ordering the english translation of the gay science instantly!! Can't wait to follow along this one because I really enjoyed your BG&E series.

  • @Villainilla
    @Villainilla หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Trying to turn Nietzsche's philosophy into a foundation for a fictional story, it's been a lot of fun :)
    Your videos are among my favorites that help me play with his ideas in good faith. Thanks for another great meal 😊

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Wishing you luck! Hard to compel modern audiences without a Christian morality play. You have to be subversive!

    • @Vladimares
      @Vladimares หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment is an attack on the idea of the Übermensh or at least the extra moral individual

  • @berizont
    @berizont หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ahhh, great. one of my absolute favorite books by Nietzsche. looking forward to read it again (in German) with you!

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Excellent, I welcome any insights about the translation vs original as we go forward

    • @berizont
      @berizont หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@untimelyreflections With pleasure I'll share any relevant findings!
      A few minutes in I noticed a detail which someone might find interesting: Nietzsche often, certainly throughout the Preface, uses the word "Leib" instead of "Körper". While both might be synonyms for the english "body" at first glance, especially "Leib" has a few more connotations that could add some associative nuance to his idea of analyzing ones Philosophy under the aspect of the underlying "leibliche Beschaffenheit" (the condition of the body).
      First, it shares the same etymological root as "Leben" (and thus "Life"). This already emphasizes the connection between our physiological condition and (our view of/quality of) Life.
      Furthermore "Leib" has been a key-term in German theological and philosophical discourse for quite some time. Theologians use the "Leib" to speak of the "beseelten Körper", the "animated/ensouled body", in contrast to the Körper/corpus as the mere unity of (anatomical, literary..) parts.
      Similar thing for Philosophy, mainly discourses about the Philosophy of the Mind or Phenomenology, which speak of "Leiblichkeit" (corporality?) as the conscious experience of subjective sensations, emotions, thoughts etc. "within" that biological body i.e. the body as the big unifiying net of those.
      "Einen Körper hat man, während man ein Leib ist." is one saying to underline the semantic difference: "You own a Körper, while you ARE a Leib".
      Too tired to expand more but you get the idea!

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@berizont This is really interesting

  • @SeanLKearns
    @SeanLKearns หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I found myself kinda prejudiced to your reading of Nietzsche at first; very much that "who does this guy think he is" take, but then I remembered that all of this is a conversation of thoughts. So it would be an injustice to read and translate the works and not expand upon this or that. I like what you're bringing to the table. Keep making videos. Who tf am I to expect any different?

    • @languagegame410
      @languagegame410 หลายเดือนก่อน

      immortalKEEG concedes this constantly (how constantly he concedes this very point you make!!)... throughout his podcast proper... consume... cogitate... ferment... and distill yourself... get pickled off the hardcore presto Nietzschean sh*t! (lol).

  • @yeyohuevonhassassin2
    @yeyohuevonhassassin2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    YESSS!!!Was waiting for this one

  • @pravail7214
    @pravail7214 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yesss were so back

    • @Vapourwear
      @Vapourwear 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      And yet the apostrophes remain absent.

    • @pravail7214
      @pravail7214 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Vapourwear not the punctuation police in a TH-cam comment section 🤦‍♂️

    • @Vapourwear
      @Vapourwear 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@pravail7214 .…you missed the period, too.

  • @wes5614
    @wes5614 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes! My favorite of Nietzsche's books. His writings on music, poetry and art are great but they go by largely overlooked in favor of the übermensch or something. He decried systematizing but many have tried to make systems out of his works. The Gay Science is perhaps his least systematized work and Beyond Good and Evil, including with that the Genealogy, was his most clear attempt at a sort of system.

  • @alexanderkuruvilla1707
    @alexanderkuruvilla1707 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Can’t believe it’s the new season already

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We’re doing Gay Science for several episodes before transitioning into regular season five episodes, but we’ll move into that after book II then return to TGS throughout the season

  • @ViVeriVniversvmVivusVici
    @ViVeriVniversvmVivusVici หลายเดือนก่อน

    I haven't read this one in its entirety! Perfect timing.

  • @alexmur6411
    @alexmur6411 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This Upload made my week !

  • @whoaitstiger
    @whoaitstiger หลายเดือนก่อน

    The mention of Nick Land reminded me of a great passage from Uncle Arthur:
    “And to this world, to this scene of tormented and agonised beings, who only continue to exist by devouring each other, in which, therefore, every ravenous beast is the living grave of thousands of others, and its self-maintenance is a chain of painful deaths; and in which the capacity for feeling pain increases with knowledge, and therefore reaches its highest degree in man, a degree which is the higher the more intelligent the man is; to this world it has been sought to apply the system of optimism, and demonstrate to us that it is the best of all possible worlds. The absurdity is glaring.”
    The World as Will and Representation, Volume I

  • @HowardGeoff
    @HowardGeoff หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do you plan on doing a Thus Spoke Zarathustra breakdown similar to ur BGE and BOT series?

  • @marvbordello6047
    @marvbordello6047 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm so hyped for this series

  • @vinista256
    @vinista256 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:48:00 - “Experienceable” is TOTALLY a real word, Keegan!

  • @ummon995
    @ummon995 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve been waiting for this for a long time.

  • @kingdm8315
    @kingdm8315 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Been waiting for this

  • @SilenzioDiEsistenza
    @SilenzioDiEsistenza หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the difference between depth of thinking and superficiality of thinking? It is only a difference in how close one approaches the mirror. The further one steps the deeper the reflection appears.

  • @laika6202
    @laika6202 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you friend! Love these podcasts.

  • @sayantanmondal2403
    @sayantanmondal2403 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great presentation as always.

  • @PeterGregoryKelly
    @PeterGregoryKelly หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nietzsche frequently doesn't distinguish between natural selection and evolution and cultural evolution. He seems to mix La Marc and Darwin evolution. Also biologists today do not hold that evolution is "ever onward upwards", in a progressive linear direction that Nietzsche uses as his model. Very often evolution is a red queen position of going faster to stay still. Particular traits are not "good" or "bad" in and of themselves but only in being adaptive or maladaptive to the particular environmental context. The same trait can be adaptive in one context and maladaptive in another. Another assumption Nietzsche makes is that wild animals are unhappy. They may face danger and struggle but they are happier than their cousins in zoos with no predators, constant food on hand and veterinary care on hand. Too much safety can be ruinous to mental health. Nietzsche almost gets this when he talks of the value of struggle. I believe many of today's mental problems are because we have built for ourselves something like a human zoo.

  • @upcontacts7344
    @upcontacts7344 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Have you done an episode on Nietzsche and perspectivism more broadly?

    • @davidscarafone5995
      @davidscarafone5995 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hell yeah go back and watch bros stuff

    • @upcontacts7344
      @upcontacts7344 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidscarafone5995 do you know which episode?

    • @davidscarafone5995
      @davidscarafone5995 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The beginning of the beyond good and evil playlist- the unconscious involuntary memoir

  • @-Llama_95
    @-Llama_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yes! I am so excited!

  • @GSOURUSAIPRASAD
    @GSOURUSAIPRASAD หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very much excited ❤

  • @matthewcasey4795
    @matthewcasey4795 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Keegan, can you please confirm which translation you're using. I want to work through the book with you but don't want to start the podcast until I get a copy. Many thanks.

    • @fannybrasse
      @fannybrasse หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Walter Kaufmann

  • @Simplyinfamous-yc4pi
    @Simplyinfamous-yc4pi หลายเดือนก่อน

    I looked at the German word frohlich. Does anyone else think is looks like frolicking? That reminds me of the meaning if gay as joy not homosexual.

  • @arjunabeuger
    @arjunabeuger หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you think that Nietzsche would’ve considered himself a transhumanist to a certain degree if he were alive today?
    Especially referring to the notion that the meaning of life is to bring forth something stronger

  • @Vapourwear
    @Vapourwear 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So ein Fröhliche Zeit!

  • @RichardBrent90111
    @RichardBrent90111 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic content. Do you do group lessons?

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You’re in one right now

    • @RichardBrent90111
      @RichardBrent90111 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @untimelyreflections Sorry, I meant Q and A questions from Twitch or youtube live or something?

  • @nicoledickens2366
    @nicoledickens2366 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THAT is where I got the idea for the great cosmic joke and the eternal sadness!

  • @adhdasian1896
    @adhdasian1896 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm reading this book for the first time, so seeing this video is awesome as hell, thanks for your work!

  • @Drumsha555
    @Drumsha555 หลายเดือนก่อน

    18:36 Book One

  • @raucousriley143
    @raucousriley143 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I love the gays

    • @raucousriley143
      @raucousriley143 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "Nobody loves the gays more than me"

    • @svalbard01
      @svalbard01 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mark Normand, that you?

    • @berizont
      @berizont หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@raucousriley143 the great gays into the abyss

    • @raucousriley143
      @raucousriley143 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@svalbard01 I thought it was Trump except about women instead of the gays, haha I don't remember exactly

    • @Rhimeson
      @Rhimeson หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Flintstones have entered the chat

  • @Hendawg3
    @Hendawg3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We backkk

  • @isaacbarratt854
    @isaacbarratt854 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nietzsche remark: 5:48

  • @darillus1
    @darillus1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    epic, this is Nietzsche's most Frolicking philosophy!

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We’re frolicking out of the decaying society with this one

  • @JennySimon206
    @JennySimon206 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Serious question: why did the early humans have to leave the forest and go into the savanna again? Pretty sure the forest is better.

    • @nocturne3455
      @nocturne3455 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How early are u talking? Last I heard the hypothesis for why pre-homo apes had to evolve to fit savannahs is because the Gibraltar mountain collapsed, flooding the entire Mediterranean. This lowered the world's sea level, shifting the weather for the entire earth, turning the jungles apes thrived in into savannahs.

    • @Vapourwear
      @Vapourwear 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Answered your own question. More competition in the arbor.

    • @willchristie2650
      @willchristie2650 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The view is better.

  • @phillipjordan1010
    @phillipjordan1010 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yo Salts what's your take on E.M. Cioran?

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A test of one’s emotional and mental fortitude.

  • @hodgeyhodge8414
    @hodgeyhodge8414 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At the end you say that science never turned its hand to the question of values, but wouldn't that be covered by evolutionary psychology? I understand that there's some controversy with that field :^)

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Arguably you’re correct, and arguably Nietzsche deserves some credit as one of the forerunners of psychology.

  • @sarahburbank1287
    @sarahburbank1287 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So excited 🎉

  • @melissasmind2846
    @melissasmind2846 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @trickywoo5165
    @trickywoo5165 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Al go rhythm 🥁 & Thx a lot 🙏🏻

  • @s.haricharan3986
    @s.haricharan3986 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keep going bro 🗿🙌

  • @chadpenner5059
    @chadpenner5059 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hate to oversimplify neitzche as i am of average intelligence at best BUT......were the bulk of his ideas and philisophy the result of acute sexual frustration ??? just curious..back to my rubiks cube :(

  • @SingularMK
    @SingularMK หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video

  • @seanpaulmccarthy
    @seanpaulmccarthy หลายเดือนก่อน

    I waited to see if it was really called the Gay Science

  • @blablabla63923
    @blablabla63923 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your claim: "N believes there is a meaning to existence, a purpose to it in absentia of god or metaphysics. We must look to the purpose that nature has given our existence, and that is, to create better stronger offspring" ??!.. and "The species is primary" ??-- Will to Power, via Klossowski-Deleuze, is about the vying of primordial forces far predating humans or any animal speciation; and the overman, when seen through this lens, is about transformation which breaks down notions of leonine strong individuality or predatory subjective voluntarism, ultimately, becoming a child again, which is all about being fluid-like, orientated toward the aleatory, and unconcerned with the Purpose or Meaning of nature (which is classical metaphysics talk), let alone anything predatory: it has zero to do with breeding better children.. How is this not neoreactionary?

    • @untimelyreflections
      @untimelyreflections  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s not “my claim”, it’s just an honest reading of Nietzsche. If you don’t like it, go somewhere else.
      I’ve also done videos on Deleuze and will talk about Klossowski next season. I give their interpretations a fair hearing.
      It’s not neoreactionary because Nietzsche is not interested in going back to anything, he doesn’t think going back is possible, he had no regard for states, for “tradition”, for races or collectives of any kind. As Deleuze rightly says these are just forms of reactivity, a futile attempt to preserve something in a world of flux. There is no telos or final state for life to reach. That being said, life is always moving, it is either ascending or descending, there is no stasis. As a particular form of life, humanity is either becoming stronger or becoming weaker. You can interpret that in the Deleuzian sense if you like: “create stronger offspring” can well mean to create the kind of person free from resentment and the bad conscience. But if you read these passages where Nietzsche is very clear about his aims and think he doesn’t make arguments concerning the fate of the species as a whole, you’re just cherrypicking and being willfully ignorant, choosing get Nietzsche through Deleuze rather than the text itself.

  • @languagegame410
    @languagegame410 หลายเดือนก่อน

    o... my... f*cking... God... i knew it!!... i began rereading this very blasphemous text not but a few months ago... happily, i am a painfully slow reader... immortalKEEG... i am humbled in the presence of your presto Nietzschean philosophical ambition... puissant, monsieur Keeg... most puissant... (YOU ARE APPRECIATED!!!!)

    • @languagegame410
      @languagegame410 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's KEEG-A-LICIOUS content to copiously consume!! (lololo?).

  • @kennethanderson8827
    @kennethanderson8827 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Well done🦈🐫

  • @GentlemanLife-Beyotch
    @GentlemanLife-Beyotch หลายเดือนก่อน

    Like you don't know whay advances your own species 😅

  • @thekinghass
    @thekinghass หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let's go

  • @xxmsp91
    @xxmsp91 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yessssssss

  • @klovvin
    @klovvin หลายเดือนก่อน

    He knew before anyone else that it's all fake and gay science 💯

  • @aulus6
    @aulus6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    omg LETS GOOO

  • @_7.8.6
    @_7.8.6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    On your point about the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) , Allah as we know it was a pagan god in ancient times. Nietzsche alludes to this in one of his aphorism when he says something to the effect “New epochs emerge when old devils are baptised as gods”

  • @dmh5220
    @dmh5220 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nietzsche was a hippie

  • @alexmur6411
    @alexmur6411 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is straight fire 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 fuuuck 🔥🔥🔥 Blitzkrieg

    • @alexmur6411
      @alexmur6411 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sorry i was on drugs when i posted that. Embarrassing

  • @geronimo8159
    @geronimo8159 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ha, gaaaaaayyye!

  • @Lmaxk007
    @Lmaxk007 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂

  • @m3tamonk3y4
    @m3tamonk3y4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @lowersaxon
    @lowersaxon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gay Science? Isnt that something else? You have at least 5 other English words for German „fröhlich“ to choose from. I would recommend The Cheerfull Science. My oh my, gay science, lol.

  • @davidjones8043
    @davidjones8043 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Didn’t watch, sounds gay

  • @amorfati4096
    @amorfati4096 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only Costin vlad Alamariu interpreted Nietzsche rightly. thats it.

  • @tarot.card.std.diagnosis
    @tarot.card.std.diagnosis หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    oh thats wonderful!

  • @Lmaxk007
    @Lmaxk007 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂