A comparison between the flawed mainstream integral calculus and the New Calculus.

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 2

  • @NewCalculus
    @NewCalculus  5 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Comparing Integration in Mainstream and New Calculus.
    Mainstream Calculus: New Calculus:
    1. Integral defined as a convergent sum 1. Integral defined as a product of arithmetic
    which in most cases is not known unless means.
    it's a well-known constant.
    2. Uses ill-formed (and non-reifiable) concepts 2. Uses only analytic geometry.
    such as infinity, infinitesimals and the circular
    theory of limits.
    3. Obfuscates comprehension process with 3. Reveals mean value theorem at work, which
    problems such as rectangles collapsing into uses sound mathematical concepts such as
    lines with no area at "actual infinity". induction and proves that an integral is the
    product of arithmetic means (more accurately
    known as level magnitudes).
    4. Requires that the mythical concept of "real 4. Does not recognize or require anything but
    number" be used. those numbers known as "rational numbers".
    5. Requires set theory and axioms (beliefs). 5. Does not recognize set theory as mathematics
    and rejects the drivel known as axioms in
    mainstream mythmatics.
    Mainstream calculus is a testimony to the utter ignorance, incompetence and incorrigible stupidity of
    mainstream mathematics academics to rigorise calculus. The New Calculus is 100% rigorous and is
    based solely on geometric concepts which cannot be challenged or disputed in any way whatsoever
    since they do not rely on the utter bullshit of axioms.

    • @NewCalculus
      @NewCalculus  5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Learn why Newton and Leinbniz had no clue why calculus works and why they couldn't explain their results:
      www.academia.edu/88991847/Neither_Newton_nor_Leibniz_actually_proved_their_claims_about_integrals_and_area
      Join here to get access to Members Only Channel:
      th-cam.com/channels/lBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A.htmljoin