What is a number? www.academia.edu/125757733/Realisation_and_Development_of_Number_in_1_Page Where does arithmetic come from? www.academia.edu/124828666/Gabriel_arithmetic_without_numbers_a_method_based_on_Thales_proportionality_theorem The arithmetic operations explained in the presentation: drive.google.com/file/d/1FUyo3GzIfRCGS5c7g7LqotnMn2zQYgBx Join here to get access to Members Only Channel: th-cam.com/channels/lBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A.htmljoin
In this part, I explain how that idiot Rudin tries to define number and the operations. Only at section 1.12 and we are in the shit up to our ears with drivel. The idiot resorts to beliefs (axioms) and laws (rules). Please, you idiots, try to use your brains for a change and not your anus. This theory is not just laughable garbage - it is dangerous to your mental health and very detrimental to your future learning.
I'm poor right now. But I promise to subscribe soon. I can't begin to tell you how much i agree with your genius. I am a genius of personality. I have used Jung's ideas to map all humans into 2 main types: those who focus on the objective stimuli and those who focus on their subjective responses to the stimuli. The former are the only ones who can form legitimate concepts. The latter can only form those cantor sets, relativity theory, and quantum physics garbage. The latter don't know the difference between physical objects, which exist, and concepts, the relation between two or more objects, which doesn’t actually exist. Existence requires a physical location. A concept has no existence in a physical sense, so it cannot be moved for example, the way these morons attempt to explain force fields causing objects to move. They reify concepts, and unrealize objects. Bastards. They should never have been allowed any position of leadership. I am in the process of designing a personality test that will test primarily for this trait, and hopefully one day it will be the one prerequisite for one's ability to be in leadership.
Yes, indeed! Once your theory is completed, it should be an interesting read. It's true about objective stimuli being the only reliable approach to thinking. Unfortunately, most people think that toddlers can't learn to think at this level, but they are sorely mistaken. Exhibit A : Me.
What is a number?
www.academia.edu/125757733/Realisation_and_Development_of_Number_in_1_Page
Where does arithmetic come from?
www.academia.edu/124828666/Gabriel_arithmetic_without_numbers_a_method_based_on_Thales_proportionality_theorem
The arithmetic operations explained in the presentation:
drive.google.com/file/d/1FUyo3GzIfRCGS5c7g7LqotnMn2zQYgBx
Join here to get access to Members Only Channel:
th-cam.com/channels/lBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A.htmljoin
In this part, I explain how that idiot Rudin tries to define number and the operations. Only at section 1.12 and we are in the shit up to our ears with drivel. The idiot resorts to beliefs (axioms) and laws (rules). Please, you idiots, try to use your brains for a change and not your anus. This theory is not just laughable garbage - it is dangerous to your mental health and very detrimental to your future learning.
I'm poor right now. But I promise to subscribe soon. I can't begin to tell you how much i agree with your genius. I am a genius of personality. I have used Jung's ideas to map all humans into 2 main types: those who focus on the objective stimuli and those who focus on their subjective responses to the stimuli. The former are the only ones who can form legitimate concepts. The latter can only form those cantor sets, relativity theory, and quantum physics garbage. The latter don't know the difference between physical objects, which exist, and concepts, the relation between two or more objects, which doesn’t actually exist. Existence requires a physical location. A concept has no existence in a physical sense, so it cannot be moved for example, the way these morons attempt to explain force fields causing objects to move. They reify concepts, and unrealize objects. Bastards. They should never have been allowed any position of leadership. I am in the process of designing a personality test that will test primarily for this trait, and hopefully one day it will be the one prerequisite for one's ability to be in leadership.
Yes, indeed! Once your theory is completed, it should be an interesting read. It's true about objective stimuli being the only reliable approach to thinking. Unfortunately, most people think that toddlers can't learn to think at this level, but they are sorely mistaken. Exhibit A : Me.