Putin's Kharkiv losses could have major impact in 2025 | Matthew Savill
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2024
- "They bleed the Russians and they cause the Russians to expend those additional people and extra materiel."
Ukraine will seek to use Putin's push on Kharkiv to "bleed" Russia's tanks and manpower as the Kremlin is forced to refurbish older equipment, says RUSI's Matthew Savill.
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
![แฟนแนวใด๋ - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4_XVMuhhbsU/mqdefault.jpg)
Does Putin fly in Helicopters? 👀. Asking for a friend.
Rusha can no longer afford such things🤣
Flying with Abram tank donated by NATO for exhibition in Moscow
Actually he tries to take the train I believe. One can understand given his background.
@@dpelpal Where did you buy your sense of humour? I would ask for my money back if I was you
@@robertnorman7309 His background is definitely not in military science lol. With the entire world laughing at the rushn' army, I can see why😂
Start with your host intro and stop the click bait intro please, I can't be bothered watching the repeat at some later stage of the video.
It's a taster, not click bait
It's stringing the video out for watch hours.
The channel is constantly splicing video clips together for that very reason.
I always skip the teaser and fast forward until I see the interviewer.
@@davidunwin7868I always skip the teaser, and finish shortly after
What do you expect from a Murdoch publication?
Please do something about the audio balance.
current quality is laughable.
I guess you would know about laughable...
He's being interviewed from a bathroom. What do you expect?
@@davidunwin7868 A decent mic costs 10 euro. He should have one since he knows he's going to be interviewed
@@martinskovpoulsen2736 not even that. Everyone has a wired headphone cable from an old phone lying around, and most professionals will have a Bluetooth headset for online meetings.
was about to comment on that 2 minutes in
-Could you please record in an echo chamber? -Would a wall of glass behind me do? -Yes
Bro, throught he'd share his interview in a lavatory
@@ScotmanUK2000 Lol.
Horrible audio; had to tune out. Lavatory at least would have had running water.
Times Radio consistently fails to check the audio before posting videos and clearly doesn't read comments.
@@TysoniusRex dude its just slightly weak audio how are you so deeply affected by it. You can easily hear everything he's saying I don't get what the big deal is. If its not crystal clear professional studio voice your ears can't handle it??? lol
Last years counter offensive didn't fall short of expectations! I dont think any military would sign on to an offensive like that without air superiority. The media's expectations are not the same as reality. Ukrain was pressured into it prematurely because the west was asking for results while tying ukraines hands at the same time.
According to western experts, Russia has no air superiority either, so it was alright to push ahead.
Ukraine is pushed by US timelines. It is based on Return on Investment. The shareholders have to be shown that Ukraine had made progress by year end.
That’s what happens when you plan for the war to be won by sanctions, and it turns into a hot war. It was never the plan for Ukraine to fight long term. Instead you have a mess causing 100k lives for pride.
@@johnadam2885 The difference is the US would not attack such fortifications unless they had air superiority. Meanwhile equipment delays and lackluster supply overall allowed the Russians to dig in for additional months. Also, while Russia doesn't have air superiority they have the air advantage and are using long-range glide bombs as their greatest advantage, otherwise their straggling advance would be even more difficult
@@Sound_Cues 'The difference is the US would not attack such fortifications unless they had air superiority.
@@johnadam2885 US would absolutely execute ground attacks without air superiority. Ukraine is in a full scale war against a great power, any plan that pre-supposes air superiority against a great power is a failed plan. We are not fighting Iraq, Vietnam or Afghanistan here.
What's next? An interview under water? Might have better sound!
Times Radio sponsors submarines
🤣🤣
You mean on board one of Russia's back sea fleet!!
Times Radio has gone down. Get your acts together if you want us to treat you as serious. Thank you.
Get your English together, botski. Ha ha 😂😂😂😂😂😂
IT WAS A CLOWN SHOW TO BEGIN WITH
ALL THE PRO-NATO CAMP HERE PATTING THEMSELVES IN THE BACK
LOTS OF SMUG FOR UKRAINE HERE
Gone down? It has always been in a Goebbels like propaganda delusional pit.
They got a sound engineer but when he's off the tea boy has to takes over.
Times Radio is an entertainment.
At first I followed the propaganda and refused to accept the sensible response from Colonel McGregor. I now have to accept what he says is a perfect analysis if the Ukraine situation.
Welcome to reality.
MacGregor is, and has been, a Russian propagandist.
The sound is not good enough in this video!
Works fine using headphones
Bro, filmed it in the lavatory on his break.
It's blaring when the presenter speaks! 📣📣📣
Sounds excellent on my I-pad pro.
Thats why he went to a lot of troubke to say "uhhh" a lot so your headache would turn to just irritation.
The audio scoreboard can't listen to it
Be kind to our ears: When the interviewee sounds as though he's at the bottom of a well, turn down the volume of the interviewer's audio.
It's not happening now either, and that's the point. Russia has already lost more men than it ever will on a monthly basis. The trend isn't going up; it's going down. You can't be attacking with smaller rifle companies and losing more men-it's just not possible. Time Radio isn't a serious channel for this topic. None of them are. All the pro-Ukraine fanboy channels, whether run by pros or amateurs, have been spreading the same false BS for months now, using the same unreliable sources.
This isn't about Russia-we know they lie. But they're not making the West lie. Just like saying Ukraine has 800,000 troops-no serious journalist believes that. If they had that many troops, they wouldn't be deemed combat ineffective by the US over a year and a half ago. The level of nonsense coming out of the West, unrelated to Russia, is so thick that I need windshield wipers to clear my eyes.
We already know the final result, so much so that it's not even interesting anymore. Unless the F-16 swoops in like a falcon and changes everything-which, hey, I'm all for-it won't remove minefields, trenches, dragon teeth, or anti-tank ditches. By the way, Russia has retaken some positions over the winter that took Ukraine months to capture. This is the main reason for the counteroffensive failures in 2023. Now that they're combat ineffective, it's unlikely any of that will ever be removed.
So, the West's great plan for something they know is over is to keep sending Russian and Ukrainian troops to the grave by the thousands. Great plan, man. Great plan.
please ensure guests are not talking in a reverb chamber
The interviewer is screaming and the guest is whispering... just wonderful.
Ohhhh my ears!!!
In some ways this war is very bizarre. Imagine if in WWII the US made a rule they weren’t allowed to strike on Japanese soil, or the UK made a rule that they were only allowed to stay on their island and defend. Is not being allowed to attack your enemy (in self-defense) common in other wars?
Devonglide.. have you heard of Nuclear weapons?
Technically, it's not a war, no party has declared war to another. For Russia, it's special military operation. For Ukraine, it's a counter-terrorist operation,
You guys are very much afraid of Super Power Russia😀😂😆
@@uzopaul871 your imagination is boundless. Super power ? I think not.
@@TonyM540 If Super Power Russia is not Super Power why is U.S hidding behind ukraine to fight Super Power Russia and not fighting Super Power Russia One On One?
Sound VOLUME problems YET again TIMES radio
Anything is possible, even you telling the TRUTH.
The truth is that they are too unprepared in military matters to understand this diversion, that is going OK.
Oil companies are pledging billions of dollars to remove the nuisances.
There are technical issues: 1. Light behind the guest it far too bright (are those windows to the outdoors?) and 2 audio from the guest is apparently coming from a computer microphone? and not from a dedicated mic, meaning audio is not balanced with the host who has a dedicated microphone.. This takes away from an otherwise fantastic interview. Too many barriers for the viewer to deal with. Maybe this might be redone with more light coming from the front, and less from the back and use of a dedicated microphone for the guest.
He's in large square room with hard surfaces everywhere. It's echoing bad.
He's not in the studio. Probably at his normal workplace.
The sibilants are so much louder than the low volume rest of it that it hurts. Can't listen to it :(
Give your sound person a stern talking to
I try so hard to look at the logic of this crisis. I can't find any from the Russian perspective. They make their older generation happy I suppose.
The rest of the world is developing AI, self driving cars, and new computer chips and rusha' is pouring 100% of it's economy into a losing war 😂
Something tells me the Americans and Brits planned it this way lol
Russia is losing? How?@@dpelpal
You think?...
A factory is easily re-purposed for civilian ' consumer goods ', and the gee's are being offered good money in Russia and are elevated by respect in Russian communities, apart from promotion after promotion.
Russia needs to make it's own cars and trucks, and can ignore patents to the profit of all Russians.
London has been bleeding Russia for ages...and now has a reality crisis in its media..they simply aren't believed any more. The BBC is a RAINBOW of trick news.
@@dpelpalmore like China and the US planned it this way. Ruzzia will eventually collapse, with the east going to China and the west to the US/Europe
@@dpelpal AI is another form of control, relying on electronics is a poor substitute for self-reliance, the western governments want you to rely on your electronic dummies, one EMP will remove communication in the west, shut down all services such as water, gas, 'leccy, landlines have been digitalised, we are more vulnerable as a nation than ever before...good planning eh?
the guys echo comes back at least 93 times every couple of secs
Don't forget that when Ukraine launched their counter offensive last year they did so with very little air cover and the only way to win a counter offensive without air cover is to have limitless man power and materials , but if like Ukraine you don't have limitless man power and materials then it's doomed to fail if you can't control the airspace above the battlefield
I trust my Ukraine brother they are ready for anything to train on for them to be defend their country
I expect more from times radio audio!
The Institute needs to invest in proper audio equipment.
My question is Why are Russia having so many Troops killed. Because its very hard to understand. When Russia are hitting the Ukraine positions from Miles Away with Artillery, Missiles and Bombs. Face to Face fighting is when you suffer Troop casualties and thats not happening. On the other hand the ones being hit by the Artillery, Missiles and Bombs must be suffering major problems.
The answer is Russia are not losing many troops. It's Ukraine that's losing hundreds of troops per day.
Why do you use random Capitals?
Ukraine has about 10 times higher losses than Russia. And it's not Russian propaganda,its from Western sources.
You are too logical.
Why is Russia losing s many troops?
Well, who says they are?
Oh, wait THIS GUY says they are.
We should believe him why?
Besides from the audio problems it seems like the guest is unaware of the different fuse in the Taurus warhead that makes it better able to pass through multiple layers and explode at you right moment.
When did the times hire Baghdad Bob ?
As usual: BAD SOUND! Horrible echo and unequal levels. BAD! BAD! BAD! Am going to another station as usual . . . . .
Sure you are.
You guys need some basic guidelines for the rooms the interviewers take your call in.
Love your program, hate the audio incongruities.
sorry cannot watch this...sound is grating on my ears....get your act together
Sorry I couldn't enjoy the interview, due to the poor sound quality / echo from the huge room....
I hope Mike Johnson realizes the damage he did by holding up US aid for so long.
He did no damage, it just never mattere
At this point this is worse than Baghdad bob😅😅😅.
It's not happening now either, and that's the point. Russia has already lost more men than it ever will on a monthly basis. The trend isn't going up; it's going down. You can't be attacking with smaller rifle companies and losing more men-it's just not possible. Time Radio isn't a serious channel for this topic. None of them are. All the pro-Ukraine fanboy channels, whether run by pros or amateurs, have been spreading the same false BS for months now, using the same unreliable sources.
This isn't about Russia-we know they lie. But they're not making the West lie. Just like saying Ukraine has 800,000 troops-no serious journalist believes that. If they had that many troops, they wouldn't be deemed combat ineffective by the US over a year and a half ago. The level of nonsense coming out of the West, unrelated to Russia, is so thick that I need windshield wipers to clear my eyes.
We already know the final result, so much so that it's not even interesting anymore. Unless the F-16 swoops in like a falcon and changes everything-which, hey, I'm all for-it won't remove minefields, trenches, dragon teeth, or anti-tank ditches. By the way, Russia has retaken some positions over the winter that took Ukraine months to capture. This is the main reason for the counteroffensive failures in 2023. Now that they're combat ineffective, it's unlikely any of that will ever be removed.
So, the West's great plan for something they know is over is to keep sending Russian and Ukrainian troops to the grave by the thousands. Great plan, man. Great plan.
GET THE SOUND SORTED! GEESO!!
THEY CHEAP ALL THOSE DONATIONS GOING STRAIGHT INTO THEIR POCKETS
A simple checklist for your guests could solve these sound problems. You could teach them how to frame a webcam correctly whilst you're about it.
The sound is fine for me on my old IPad
Who runs your audio? The MTA?
Filmed on a potato or in a lavatory. Sound is terrible 😬
I appreciate someone who really does study this stuff, so I do not want to insult times for seeking real professionals, but you really do need to consider film quality, sound quality, as well.
They become just a fan boy, nothing you learn from here
DUFF AUDIO AGAIN!!!!!!!
Why do you have such difficulty with your audio levels?
Please ask your guests to use headphones with a good microphone. So often the audio quality is very bad
Some times you have to lose a little to gain a lot , God is With Ukraine ,
I doubt God would support Ukranazies.
They can put a man on the Moon, but Times Radio still can't deliver quality sound.
I don't think Times Radio ever put a man on the moon
@@jonm7272 Well I didn't say "Times Radio can put a man on the Moon, but they still can't deliver quality sound."
@@aexetan2769 I’m sure you didn’t mean to say that, but that is exactly what you said.
@@robertshiell887 It's unlikely that someone would misinterpret "They can put a man on the Moon" to mean that Times Radio can put a man on the Moon. The context clearly contrasts a well-known historical achievement with the relatively simple task of delivering quality sound on Times Radio, which is falling short.
@@aexetan2769 They can win every game, but The Sheboygan Segways still can’t win the championship.
It's amazing that they are not conscripting 18-year-olds.
Perhaps the female host. She seems 18 yrs old.
The IF's are so many that you can't see success for West in this war
No, he does not fly in Helicopters,...but he does look out windows in tall buildings.
🇺🇦❤💪🇬🇧👍💪❤🇺🇦
How many invaders across the channel today ??????
Bad audio quality left early
Ta ta
There's a lot of talk about diverting Ukrainian troops... why does that matter? It takes ruzzian troops to divert Ukrainian troops, and it typically takes more troops to attack than it does to defend.
Cool
If you could adjust your volume to meet your guests
Lack of combined arms strategy and tactics by Ukraine? How exactly does Ukraine exercise a combined arms strategy and tactics, without F16s. The Western Nations pushed Ukraine to launch a counter offensive without AirPower and tied their hands when it came to striking targets in Russia. Ridiculous.
Its looking like a modern day Verdun.
Could really use some audio balancing or filtering, something about where this guy is filming makes it really hard to listen to on headphones.
The disparity in volume between the host and the guest is truly annoying and makes this hard to watch! LOUD, quiet; LOUD, quiet..............
What about Ukraine's meat wall tactics to compensate for a lack of equipment? Sending men to the front with less than a week of training? Can Ukraine even stay in this fight until 2025 when the situation on all fronts is critical already, morale is sub zero and mobilization failing? And then the Russian summer offensive hasn't even started yet.
"Listen to Times Radio on my digital radio" What's that? 📻
Do we not have digital radios in Russia?
sounds like he is calling from a loo
When you gotta go you gotta go.
In that case she probably doesn't know where to go. The male (very wrong) or the female one.
They can get more recluts from the prisons.
Nobody seems to be talking about the fact the equipment will be in the frontline soon & this year the UAF knows how to use it properly, such as the Bradley’s and the HIMARS & nit to mention last year the Ukrainians had NO air superiority what so ever on the battlefield which always seems to get pushed under the rug and hardly ever mentioned . With Ukrainians destruction of their logistics and smart planning , they should be fine if the F-16s show up along with plenty of artillery shells . The Russians have sure learned a lot from their previous mistakes, but the Ukrainians have learned how to defend their positions and use attrition of the opposition forces to maximize their gains and try to minimize their losses like no other army on the planet. They’re survivors and I don’t think things are quite as bad ad they’re made out to be
None of that matters, Modern wars aren't meant to be fought stagnant, they are by the very design of America might to be moving forward always.
What Ukraine wants and the majority of everyday villages idiot wants, is a Missile Shield Wall that isn't possible so that they can stand behind it and not get killed.
I am concerned that the Russian contract recruitment is providing a steady flow of troops who are making gains. Russia will be able to see that tapering off and can begin to revert to a defensive role and push for an armistice to conserve what it has taken. Look back at many wars with major powers involved and how exhaustion sets in at 3 or 4 or 5 years. I am not thinking of wars against relatively modest opponents (Afghanistan, Iraq). I am thinking of Korea, WWII, WW1, even the American civil war. Freed slaves joining the Union Army in the last two years of that war brought it to a close. Americans arriving in 1917 helped bring WW1 to an end. Both sides were exhausted at the end of the Korean War. I don't see Ukraine being equipped sufficiently to recover all its territory. It seems that it is being equipped to turn the tide on a minor scale with the Western goal of reaching an armistice. Bringing in Western air forces to supplement the Ukrainian air force could culminate the current war. There would be the nuclear saber rattling and a settlement borne out of high stakes. Putin has to put on a show to save face. What Ukraine very much needs once an armistice is in place is Western forces in country to deter further Russian aggression.
@@timtrewyn453 that from day one was the 90% probability. The war will be ending un peace talks
I’m English however watching this reflects the state of the political class sleep walking into
World war 2 with kinjals 😳
It could but on the other hand it couldn't।
cool
Such nonsense. The Ukrainians lost month ago. Sensible people would be negotiating for peace. The longer they persist with their nonsense the less and less of Ukraine they will be able to retain. They could have retained it all, but the Americans were having nothing of that. They are going to lose Odessa.
Exactly. And disgraceful how little concern for the half million Ukrainians killed already. How many more will lose their lives because of this propaganda. How many millions of Ukrainians have fled the country? All completely unnecessary.
'Shovels' 2023......
Great Video, thanks for sharing
Horrible Audio
I can't read the comments, too annoying having to see the same comment about the audui over and over again 😂
Doubtful it will last till 2025
One (so called) expert says one thing, whilst another says the total opposite.
2025? You will see the effects much sooner. They are deploying the last vehicles they have, straight from the parade on red square 😂
Sound is very bad..
The Russians lost 600k men in one battle in WW2….never count them out
You said the same about bahmut, then Avdiivka, now Kharkov
Kyiv will be the same?
Weakness is not a winning strategy ❌❌❌❌❌🚫🚭😔😞👎🤬
Keep talking for the money!!!
You're such clever people, getting paid for this...
This is an Uber Lesson in body language. People talking the talk, and betrayed by their uncontrolled body language..facially...
Times Radio goes bla, bla, bla.
Russians go splat, splat, splat.
What's that TV Show:
LIE TO ME
Tough to listen to when the host's audio volume is twice as high as the guest's audio.
So…
Ukraine's losses could have major impact in 2024
Technically this is amateur hour
Savill's audio is awful...
Gave up trying to listen to this. Sound recording is absolute pits. Heard better in a long tunnel..
Please, closer to the mike.
It's now being called the "Kharkiv Failure" 😂😂😂
Putin has mastered the ability to lose. Has become a black belt. 🥋
@@Calibism2345 NYT is now calling the rushn' army the "Kharkiv Klutzes" 😂
"It was a feint, a gesture of goodwill, we aren't even trying." - Russia probably.
@@foilhat1138 _Just wait until rushns' really start fighting!_
@@dpelpalThe NYT now there a credible source 😂😂
These people live in the paralel universe
What an awful sound capture! 😳 Couldn't your interviewed not find a more appropriate place than that huge hall with such a bad acoustic ?!
Sound is terrible!
the Ukrainians waited far too long to conscript more men. They've started now but it takes time to give new troops even basic training even with NATO training help.
SOUND NEEDS SORTING!!! Sound levels difference between the interview and the guest are awful!!! Turned it right up to be able to hear guest and then blew my eardrums out when interviewer spoke.
Hmmm. Where are 'we'? The UK isn't a participant in the Ukraine war.
Indirectly it is.
we've been sending them all of our equipment, what do you mean we are not a participant?
If it's occurred to Mr Savill of RUSI that Russia will need to start retooling in 2025, then you can be sure that Russia's new Defence Secretary is already planning exactly that (with the help of China and NK). Meanwhile Ukraine relies fingers crossed on foreign equipment ramp up and potential Western factories built somewhere in-country.
😂 COPE harder guys
the audio is terrible
I keep hearing criticism of the Ukrainians re: their inability to carry out "combined arms warfare"... but one of the most important "arms" of these operations is AIR POWER, which the Ukrainians still don't have. Yes, NATO forces carry this out, but with overwhelming airpower superiority. So far, we have not been capable of supplying the Ukrainians with the equipment and training they need to apply this force! The insistence on their using the F-16 - which requires and entirely new training and supply/maintenance chains instead of giving them additional Sukoi and Mig planes that are available and which the Ukrainians could use more quickly due to familiarity has overwhelmingly delayed their application to the war.
The problem with a lot of the recent analysis is that it's all common sense. Yes, the losses COULD have an impact in 2025. We all know that without an expert telling us. But ultimately, no one knows what will actually happen, because it all hinges on the shaky support that our politicians provide to Ukraine. If Trump is elected, I guess Kharkiv losses won't matter as much, will they