What you said is the partial truth... what if someone already has a lot of capital and can risk investing in businesses? Even they benefit... They already have an advantage over those who have to take loans... its not black and white
Socialism is in nature of construction and capitalism is also in nature of constitution so basically India constitution is sociocapitalism in which both are balanced equaly
Socialism will help to curb the increasing divide between the rich and the poor in India. Socialism is pro poor. Those who support Adani and AMBANI will always be against Socialism.
@@s-qc9ns Cut from the same cloth as brahminism ...islam was created from kashmiri pandits called baramkids for the abbasids by corrupting the original christian heresy that was unitarian islam
Religon is only deviding the people. One needs to seek God who is love.@@s-qc9ns
วันที่ผ่านมา
Ambedkar was just a draftsman, he did not create the constitution, which was written by 293 members. Ambedkar was also against Indian independence. Listen to Hamara Pradad.
India theoriticaly by default secular since centuries. But in reality secular word inducted into constitution during Indira Gandhi period to create minority community votebank and assured votebank for the advantage congress party. Indias most of the secular and votebank oriented political parties are born through congress party.
*_Symbolic representation and in action both are necessary._* जिस देश का प्रधानमंत्री जनता को कपड़ों से पहचान कर भेद भाव करते हों वहां कपड़ो की तरह ही संविधान के पहले पन्ने पर सेकुलर, सोशलिस्ट, डेमोक्रेसी दिखाना चाहिए।
Hope Honourable Sri. CJI Sanjeev Khanna ji take all the solid happenings and give a protective judgement to protect our Freedom and Democracy. We are in danger. MASSIVE CORRUPTION IS SWALLOWING Our nation.
Nothing will happen seemaji , it will just be another eye wash and time pass , what happened in electoral bond case even though prima facie showed it was a biggest scam and nothing happened,, judiciary has lost its morals and ethics and working with a broken spine, judicial power and strength is only shown on common man cases .
You are exaggerating. You have no freedom and liberty? What nonsense. You are expressing this belief. Isn’t a liberty you are enjoying. Perhaps you should seek permanent residence in Iran
India is not a Secular country so long as there is duality in civil code... it is an anti -thesis of a secular nation.. secularism is not a one-way traffic
Who are opposing socialist and secular? What do they want to implement? Sharia law or Manu Swriti or Talibani law to turn India into polarised religious counrties like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan??
The opposite of socialist is the merit base society with equal opportunity. The opposite of secular is preserving the foundation and boundary of Indian civilization.
@@Rajan_Rout socialism itself is about equality and equal opportunity. It is in between leftist and rightist. It keeps the balance. Preserving foundation is called ignoring the update and preferring the faith over fact based spiritual, technological upliftment. India needs thoughtful progress which bhakts with foundation of Satidaha, Jawhar and Superstition can't achieve and make India 3rd world developing countries instead of developed one. Whereas countries like Japan absorbed 2 neuclear bombs but are way ahead from us. Same with China. We compare ourselves with other 3rd world countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan etc so we won't be able to achieve that height with this caveman foundation..
क्योंकि देश में आपातकाल लागु था जिस की विश्रुत चर्चा किये बिना तब मूल प्रस्तावना में प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी द्वारा जोड़े गए इस लिए इन शब्दों को हटाने की आवश्यकता है.
Phir to j&k , north east states , Sikkim b indian union ke sath Orginal consistution ma amendment ke baad hi jode they Aur in states ki inke customs, faith , culture , state jobs/land jase right states ke pass hi rahenge security di gyi thi Par j&k ka to kuch shoda hi nhi Pm , sadar ai rayist (president) tk apna tha j&k ka 1927 se lekar 1965 tk Kal je states b bol skti ha hum india ka part they hi nhi jb original constitution bna tha india ka humko orginal consistution ma amendment krke india ka part bnaya gya tha Kyu desh ko todne ma lge ho nayaliko thoda dimag se socho
भारत में सैकुलरिज्म शब्द का घोरतम दुर्पयोग कांग्रेस ने मुस्लिम तुष्टिकरण में किया है। सब धर्मों के सम्मान की आड़ में हिन्दूओं का प्रतारणा और दमन क्यों। इसलिए या तो यह शब्द हटा दिया जाये या फिर इस कि व्याख्या आधुनिक सोच अनुसार की जाये। आधुनिक सोच के अनुसार सरकार और राजनीति का धर्म और धार्मिक विषयों से कोई सरोकार नहीं होना चाहिए।
The term "Secularism" as introduced in British parliament actually means the "the government shall not make any law specific to any citizen based on the religion, faith, sect or gender but treat all the citizens with equal rights and privileges". This really means that they will follow this "Uniform Civil Code" as one rule and law for all citizens with no reservation based on religion or caste or gender. Perhaps, they can give financial help for any poor person based on family income - for ALL poor persons under one rule.
Either they should follow secularism or remove it. it shouldn't be partial . And people should know the idea of secularism in respect of ambedkar ji. It's not like leaders at that time don,t know the word secularism.
Political fear mongoring is not working in the age of Internet. You should have accepted it by now after witnessing last 3 general election. Talk on merits and demerits only.
If we're so secular then what's the harm in having the word secular on the preamble or maybe omitting it is a good start for something new....As for The Great Baba Saheb he was a visionary but he would not have feared a secular word on preamble but these days times are changing fast
EVVPAT 100%counting slips to EVMs ? Can supreme court has any power to pronounce judgement If ED ,EC going against constitution and democracy...? What are the procedures to be punished ...?? Demacratic people believing our present CJI will definitely pronounce judgement according to constitution to safe guard democracy .
एक तरफ तो भारत को धर्म निर्पेक्ष कहा गया है वहीं दूसरी तरफ अल्पसंख्यक और बहुसंख्यक धर्म के आधार पर बांटे गये है। ये तो दोगली बात हुई ना । इसलिये तो भारत सेक्युलर नही होना चाहिये ,अगर भारत सेक्युलर होना चाहिये तो उसमे अल्पसंख्यक तथा बहुसंख्यक धर्म के आधार पर नही होने चाहिये ।
Ye desh na kabhi secular tha hai aur aage rahega Agar itna hi secular hai madarsa aur convent school hai Gurukul ki permission kyun nhi Agar muslim aur Christian guru ko salary mil sakti hai pandit ko kyun nhi Agar masjid aur chuch sarkar k control mein nhi toh mandir ko kyun sarkar apne control mein rakha hua hai
If Secularism is already protected then why honorable advocates are worried about deleting the word from preamble. 😂😂 Why they are wasting time of courts to do some other constructive jobs.
A nation that does not recognize gurukul but acknowledges madarsa education, also gives grants to madarsas, has draconian body like WAQF and controls the places of worship of hindus and takes the funds of the temple is secular in which universe?
Equality Liberty Fraternity ki dhajiya har roj udti h yha. Jab inn teeno baato ko koi ni maange toh socialism aur secular sabd jodne padege aur jab log inn dono ko nhi maange toh hor naye words jode jayege
Amendment to be based on the need of the times. Now there is an urgent requirement. When Muslims outnumber us, there will not be any Constitution. Only Sharia. India is heading towards that. Think of it. First save the nation by enacting suitable amendments.
Need to keep the original constitution. I disagree with CjI because if congress party declare emergency again and replace the secular word with islamic in the preamble then later SC will not nullify that change?? Whatever they did at emergency time it should be revoked without any second thought.
It took 48 years for people to realise that every amendment during emergency were illegal. Are you questioning the wisdom the governments that came post emergency.
Congress declared emergency but this govt has an undeclared emergency like atmosphere where people especially minorities are living a life of tension anytime they and their religious place can be attracted what about that pls put urself in their position and think
Desh me Etna problem chalrahe bekarartho... No job ..... Usbare toh koi discuss nehihe.... Faltu faltu jojarurat hehi he.... Usbare discuss care time lose ..... Kuch log hotahe .... Position paneke bat, khut bhul jatahe usko Desh development ke liye ke karna chaiye
bro desh ka chinta kisi ko nahi ha bas sob dharm ka raksha korna ma busy ha chaha desh ka condition bangladesh sa bi karab ho hamara to desh sa bada dharm hota ha isliya aj adani jasa corrupt business man desh ma ak king ka tarah raj kor raha ha or ham middle class basic needs ka liya tarap raha ha........... par hamara MLAs or MPs don`t care ............... so, sad
@kamranakmal9215 ehitoh horahe ..... Sab atahe aar loot karke jata he..... Middle class or garib lok .... Cinema ketarab dekhta he no reaction.... Next konsa ayga...
Today Constitution day was celebrated. But question which constitution is celebrated 42nd Amendment constitution or original constitution. today celebration is 42nd Amendment constitution and not original. 42nd Amendment is congress constitution. and Not Indian Constitution.
saaf dikhra hai govt.. khood nai krna chahti iska reason hai votebank and yeah supreme court dwara hatwana chahta hai jisey aarop supreme court oar ayay aur Votebnak na jaye govt ka
@md.sarfarajalam6812 UCC is nothing to do with culture or religion. It is just Indian or not. Just like most western countries or even in Saudi and UAE, any culture, religion can be practiced but no exception in law due to it
@anooppc82 India is far different from saudi or any western countries Only one question can you apply ucc uniformly Answer is a big no Even leaders who are advocating it they too are naming communities who won't be affected
Secularism is a Christian concept and Socialism is a communist concept. People who say they want Ambhedkars constitution wouldn't have read a single article or book he's written and compunding why he abstained from using secular and socialist from the initial draft of the constitution and how they were added to the constitution illegitimately during the prolonged dictatorship of Indira Gandhi during emergency.
Yes by incorporating Secular word by shameless Nehru in the constitution, not given by Ambedkarji, is a shameless act. Pakisthan was separeted by Nehru - Jinna was for Muslims and all Muslims must go to Pakisthan if they don't obey Bharatiya laws. Statement made by SC is not correct.
How many of the top BJP leaders are brahmin and what is the proprtion of brahmins voting for BJP. BJP is OBC party. Brahmins are voting for the the party of the person holding Dattatriya gotriya kaul gotriya brahmin. In many states people opted for regional party ousting congress due the domination of brahmin leaders in party. Even major section of leaders in leftist parties are brahmins. So brahmins prefers leftists and islamists for their self interests 😅
The words 'secular' and 'socialism' should be excluded from the preamble as the insertion is not legally. But power to amend the preamble rest with the Parliament.
BJP should immediately undo the 42 nd amendment to the constitution. When the Congress can add these two words to the preamble of the constitution, retrospectively BJP should declare that amendment null and void and repeal it by bringing in another amendment in this winter session.
What judge r playing? complete the crime case and send people back home there family first, how didn't do crime but with help of money and political parties such people r behind the bar, complete them first if no such case found even one then judge should discuss this kind of case with lowers, i guess goverment and constitutions is in wrong hand's so such things r happening, if something goes out in constitution then some things again will go good waves of then bad should all so get waves of go understanding.
Secularism is not a bharatiya concept, we believe in sarv dharm samman instead. This two are different concepts. Secular seperates state from religion, and creates a pressure on majority community to suppress it's believes and concepts. On the other hand,India believes in mutual respect.
If u people don't know about constitution then dont keep arguments and judgement y that time 42 amendment had keep secular and socialist and even lots of debate cases are there don't speak stupid is this a joke to remove it so easily.....the people who want to remove it that means they don't want a secular state and there should be a violence in india what that time the people who wrote constitution face it they want to remove india from map such a damage place we are making it
The original Preamble of the Constitution should remain
Who works more, will earn more money. Socialism doesn’t favour hard workers.
What you said is the partial truth... what if someone already has a lot of capital and can risk investing in businesses? Even they benefit... They already have an advantage over those who have to take loans... its not black and white
Socialism is in nature of construction and capitalism is also in nature of constitution so basically India constitution is sociocapitalism in which both are balanced equaly
Socialism will help to curb the increasing divide between the rich and the poor in India.
Socialism is pro poor. Those who support Adani and AMBANI will always be against Socialism.
I agree it should be removed.
We need to go back our old constitution which was given by Ambedkar. Jai baba saheb ambedkar
Ambedkar ji thought Muslim society was incapable of tolerating other religion. He was right.
@@s-qc9ns
Cut from the same cloth as brahminism ...islam was created from kashmiri pandits called baramkids for the abbasids by corrupting the original christian heresy that was unitarian islam
Religon is only deviding the people. One needs to seek God who is love.@@s-qc9ns
Ambedkar was just a draftsman, he did not create the constitution, which was written by 293 members. Ambedkar was also against Indian independence. Listen to Hamara Pradad.
Need Uniform Civil Code Law....
Yes and there should be no provisions of taxes based on religion like HUF
@@imamalia.s.foundation9454 There should be taxes
@curiositylikeacat8119 Yes, but not on the basis of religion
@imamalia.s.foundation9454 everyone should pay as per certain %ge of profit
@curiositylikeacat8119 Yes
India theoriticaly by default secular since centuries. But in reality secular word inducted into constitution during Indira Gandhi period to create minority community votebank and assured votebank for the advantage congress party. Indias most of the secular and votebank oriented political parties are born through congress party.
If secular word will deleted, secular people have long fight to settle to proove that they have also equal rights
In what way equal rights related to secular, ? Butt head
More power to Vishnu Jain.
*_Symbolic representation and in action both are necessary._*
जिस देश का प्रधानमंत्री जनता को कपड़ों से पहचान कर भेद भाव करते हों वहां कपड़ो की तरह ही संविधान के पहले पन्ने पर सेकुलर, सोशलिस्ट, डेमोक्रेसी दिखाना चाहिए।
Hope Honourable Sri. CJI Sanjeev Khanna ji take all the solid happenings and give a protective judgement to protect our Freedom and Democracy. We are in danger. MASSIVE CORRUPTION IS SWALLOWING Our nation.
Thank you Law Chakra madam.
Nothing will happen seemaji , it will just be another eye wash and time pass , what happened in electoral bond case even though prima facie showed it was a biggest scam and nothing happened,, judiciary has lost its morals and ethics and working with a broken spine, judicial power and strength is only shown on common man cases .
Yes for communist, liberal and woke peoples.
You are exaggerating. You have no freedom and liberty? What nonsense. You are expressing this belief. Isn’t a liberty you are enjoying. Perhaps you should seek permanent residence in Iran
It's Never Been Sequler "!😂✌️
Actions are Better than words.
Actions can be seen whereas words are always unheard
Bharath and Bharathiya are truly secular
There’s no need to add it and make it as a free card to attack only Sanatani
As from so called upper caste i want original constitution not made by khangress
Article 29 and 30 should have been deleted when india became secular....
India is not a Secular country so long as there is duality in civil code... it is an anti -thesis of a secular nation.. secularism is not a one-way traffic
Who are opposing socialist and secular? What do they want to implement? Sharia law or Manu Swriti or Talibani law to turn India into polarised religious counrties like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan??
The opposite of socialist is the merit base society with equal opportunity. The opposite of secular is preserving the foundation and boundary of Indian civilization.
@@Rajan_Rout socialism itself is about equality and equal opportunity. It is in between leftist and rightist. It keeps the balance. Preserving foundation is called ignoring the update and preferring the faith over fact based spiritual, technological upliftment. India needs thoughtful progress which bhakts with foundation of Satidaha, Jawhar and Superstition can't achieve and make India 3rd world developing countries instead of developed one. Whereas countries like Japan absorbed 2 neuclear bombs but are way ahead from us. Same with China. We compare ourselves with other 3rd world countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan etc so we won't be able to achieve that height with this caveman foundation..
has to remain secular and enlightened by wisdom of equitable justice system !
Action needed
क्योंकि देश में आपातकाल लागु था जिस की विश्रुत चर्चा किये बिना तब मूल प्रस्तावना में प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी द्वारा जोड़े गए इस लिए इन शब्दों को हटाने की आवश्यकता है.
Phir to j&k , north east states , Sikkim b indian union ke sath
Orginal consistution ma amendment ke baad hi jode they
Aur in states ki inke customs, faith , culture , state jobs/land jase right states ke pass hi rahenge security di gyi thi
Par j&k ka to kuch shoda hi nhi
Pm , sadar ai rayist (president) tk apna tha j&k ka 1927 se lekar 1965 tk
Kal je states b bol skti ha hum india ka part they hi nhi jb original constitution bna tha india ka humko orginal consistution ma amendment krke india ka part bnaya gya tha
Kyu desh ko todne ma lge ho nayaliko thoda dimag se socho
If they remove the secular amendment, let them also roll back Land reforms act . Which too is based on the principle of equality and article 39b.
Let's look into that also.
India has been Secular since 1950 by constitution. Useless words "Secular, Socialist" must be removed.
If it is already secular then what's the problem mentioning it clearly so as it is understandable???
Symbolic statements and actions too needed.
We need the original Preamble of the constitution.
भारत में सैकुलरिज्म शब्द का घोरतम दुर्पयोग कांग्रेस ने मुस्लिम तुष्टिकरण में किया है। सब धर्मों के सम्मान की आड़ में हिन्दूओं का प्रतारणा और दमन क्यों। इसलिए या तो यह शब्द हटा दिया जाये या फिर इस कि व्याख्या आधुनिक सोच अनुसार की जाये। आधुनिक सोच के अनुसार सरकार और राजनीति का धर्म और धार्मिक विषयों से कोई सरोकार नहीं होना चाहिए।
In the 1st place it should not have been changed. And now it must be retained to it's original state.
Must refer to original constituent assembly debate and discussion where some points were striked out just because of non-availability of majority.
If no secularism then what will be replaced. I can't understand
The term "Secularism" as introduced in British parliament actually means the "the government shall not make any law specific to any citizen based on the religion, faith, sect or gender but treat all the citizens with equal rights and privileges". This really means that they will follow this "Uniform Civil Code" as one rule and law for all citizens with no reservation based on religion or caste or gender. Perhaps, they can give financial help for any poor person based on family income - for ALL poor persons under one rule.
Rehna chahiye 🎉
Inhumanty badhegi nikala to,
Abhi hai to log secure hai
Need to create new rule book to define seclar & Socilaist meanings of our constitution.......
Either they should follow secularism or remove it. it shouldn't be partial . And people should know the idea of secularism in respect of ambedkar ji. It's not like leaders at that time don,t know the word secularism.
We want original preamble Just after independence not the amended one
Both are important... The words must be emphasised... And the actions must echo them.
Then BJP will loose 3/4 th of its vote base.
Really?
Political fear mongoring is not working in the age of Internet. You should have accepted it by now after witnessing last 3 general election. Talk on merits and demerits only.
Naa😅😅
Open letter to both the Goi and GoM to immediately my Naga Nation Country as it is in the Ancient Time. ❤
India is Secular and Socialist.....❤
With words and Without words
Back to preamble, no need to add in
The original preamble of the constitution secular and socialist should remain.
We also have right of equality to produce any number of children
If we're so secular then what's the harm in having the word secular on the preamble or maybe omitting it is a good start for something new....As for The Great Baba Saheb he was a visionary but he would not have feared a secular word on preamble but these days times are changing fast
Then also remove democratic and republic 😂😂😂.....aur lunbhakt rastra jod lo
EVVPAT 100%counting slips to EVMs ?
Can supreme court has any power to pronounce judgement If ED ,EC going against constitution and democracy...? What are the procedures to be punished ...?? Demacratic people believing our present CJI will definitely pronounce judgement according to constitution to safe guard democracy .
एक तरफ तो भारत को धर्म निर्पेक्ष कहा गया है वहीं दूसरी तरफ अल्पसंख्यक और बहुसंख्यक धर्म के आधार पर बांटे गये है। ये तो दोगली बात हुई ना ।
इसलिये तो भारत सेक्युलर नही होना चाहिये ,अगर भारत सेक्युलर होना चाहिये तो उसमे अल्पसंख्यक तथा बहुसंख्यक धर्म के आधार पर नही होने चाहिये ।
Its okay, let us be santani desha.
Ye desh na kabhi secular tha hai aur aage rahega
Agar itna hi secular hai madarsa aur convent school hai Gurukul ki permission kyun nhi
Agar muslim aur Christian guru ko salary mil sakti hai pandit ko kyun nhi
Agar masjid aur chuch sarkar k control mein nhi toh mandir ko kyun sarkar apne control mein rakha hua hai
6:30 jb action hi nahi hai at least symbolism mein hi rehne de secularism ko
We need the Original Constitution
If Secularism is already protected then why honorable advocates are worried about deleting the word from preamble. 😂😂
Why they are wasting time of courts to do some other constructive jobs.
It should be remain in the preamble
No it should be not remain. Hindu Rashtra no secular..
Bhaii yeh gandhi pariwar chata kyaa hai melody se jada yeh janna chata hu meh
Ashwini sir is superb
Instead of socialism what will be replaced.
Toh he is saying bhai modi ji -- ammendment karlo thora .. hum toh bass taali denge sucess ki 😅
Half hearted approach on your part as you're doing the job without proper homework.
A nation that does not recognize gurukul but acknowledges madarsa education, also gives grants to madarsas, has draconian body like WAQF and controls the places of worship of hindus and takes the funds of the temple is secular in which universe?
SYMBOLISM IS MORE IMPORTANT..
Yes. India has bevome a fundamentalist nation like Afganistan.
REMIVE SECULAR AND SOCIALIST WORDS
this is like newton 3rd law in europe is different and here it is not same law, secular is forced on indians
Equality Liberty Fraternity ki dhajiya har roj udti h yha. Jab inn teeno baato ko koi ni maange toh socialism aur secular sabd jodne padege aur jab log inn dono ko nhi maange toh hor naye words jode jayege
Just Diversion from Important Issues & Waste Court's Time & Disturb Justice Delivery System.
😅🤣😂
Dang true
We don't need government to tell us how we want to live or behave. Stupid people sitting on top.
Yes both words are must
Amendment to be based on the need of the times. Now there is an urgent requirement. When Muslims outnumber us, there will not be any Constitution. Only Sharia. India is heading towards that. Think of it. First save the nation by enacting suitable amendments.
Secularism has to b there
By birth every hindu is secular. So there is no need of it in writing.
Priyamble is the introduction of Indian Constitution thats why it's the basic structure
Need to keep the original constitution. I disagree with CjI because if congress party declare emergency again and replace the secular word with islamic in the preamble then later SC will not nullify that change?? Whatever they did at emergency time it should be revoked without any second thought.
😄😄 it require 1\3 majority of MP which is impossible ..... so don`t worry about constitution it is safe rather you should focus on your job
@kamranakmal9215 do you know how many times our construction was amended?
It took 48 years for people to realise that every amendment during emergency were illegal. Are you questioning the wisdom the governments that came post emergency.
Congress declared emergency but this govt has an undeclared emergency like atmosphere where people especially minorities are living a life of tension anytime they and their religious place can be attracted what about that pls put urself in their position and think
Desh me Etna problem chalrahe bekarartho... No job ..... Usbare toh koi discuss nehihe....
Faltu faltu jojarurat hehi he.... Usbare discuss care time lose .....
Kuch log hotahe .... Position paneke bat, khut bhul jatahe usko Desh development ke liye ke karna chaiye
bro desh ka chinta kisi ko nahi ha bas sob dharm ka raksha korna ma busy ha chaha desh ka condition bangladesh sa bi karab ho hamara to desh sa bada dharm hota ha isliya aj adani jasa corrupt business man desh ma ak king ka tarah raj kor raha ha or ham middle class basic needs ka liya tarap raha ha........... par hamara MLAs or MPs don`t care ............... so, sad
@@Barman18 why are you watching these videos and writing comments looks like you are not doing your job 😁😁😁
@kamranakmal9215 ehitoh horahe ..... Sab atahe aar loot karke jata he..... Middle class or garib lok .... Cinema ketarab dekhta he no reaction.... Next konsa ayga...
Climate and air ka to baat hi nahi horahi
Dono zaroori h....kyunki likha hua h tb to itna jaat paat aur religion target ho rha h desh mei...hta denge to yhi log baad aur zulm karenge aur bolenge dharmik azadi ni likhi h samvidhan mei...
Today Constitution day was celebrated. But question which constitution is celebrated 42nd Amendment constitution or original constitution. today celebration is 42nd Amendment constitution and not original. 42nd Amendment is congress constitution. and Not Indian Constitution.
saaf dikhra hai govt.. khood nai krna chahti iska reason hai votebank and yeah supreme court dwara hatwana chahta hai jisey aarop supreme court oar ayay aur Votebnak na jaye govt ka
Unconstitutional insertion deemed arbitrary....
Then please support UCC in India all has same privilege
No one can dare ucc uniformly
There will be 100s exception & still will be call ucc
India has diverce culture can't apply ucc
@md.sarfarajalam6812 UCC is nothing to do with culture or religion. It is just Indian or not. Just like most western countries or even in Saudi and UAE, any culture, religion can be practiced but no exception in law due to it
@anooppc82
India is far different from saudi or any western countries
Only one question can you apply ucc uniformly
Answer is a big no
Even leaders who are advocating it they too are naming communities who won't be affected
Why did you make it in the first place...?
Lagta hain abh yeh desh kabie Shanti se nahi reh phaiga
law nakra ka jal gaya . jalo jalo jalo law chakra
Opposite of socialism is capitalism depending on Adani Ambani with no eqality of wealth. Choice is ours
No comments, just remove it as it was not passed by majority in the parliament.
India has given part of their land as Pakistan. There is no such thing as secular. Pakistan or Bangladesh practice Secular?
Original amendment
Stupid people are asking for stupid things.
Modi is responsible
Secular word ko hattao. Baki socialist thik hai
Hindu Rashtra!!
India is not secular, It should me idially Hindu. (Sanatan Rastra)
Bharath hundhu rashtre jaroor hoga
India is always secular no changes in preamble ever
Secularism is a Christian concept and Socialism is a communist concept. People who say they want Ambhedkars constitution wouldn't have read a single article or book he's written and compunding why he abstained from using secular and socialist from the initial draft of the constitution and how they were added to the constitution illegitimately during the prolonged dictatorship of Indira Gandhi during emergency.
#Hindurastra chaiye
Yes by incorporating Secular word by shameless Nehru in the constitution, not given by Ambedkarji, is a shameless act. Pakisthan was separeted by Nehru - Jinna was for Muslims and all Muslims must go to Pakisthan if they don't obey Bharatiya laws. Statement made by SC is not correct.
Modiji's Govt. will remove these words today or tomorrow.
RSS led BJP wants to establish a hindu state, basically a Brahmins led, ruled and governed state.
How many of the top BJP leaders are brahmin and what is the proprtion of brahmins voting for BJP. BJP is OBC party. Brahmins are voting for the the party of the person holding Dattatriya gotriya kaul gotriya brahmin. In many states people opted for regional party ousting congress due the domination of brahmin leaders in party. Even major section of leaders in leftist parties are brahmins. So brahmins prefers leftists and islamists for their self interests 😅
that's just propaganda.
Hindutva and sharia are two sides of the same coin. 😂🤪😃
Actions are more important than symbols.
Symbols n names are changed by empty heads
Should have said this to Indira Gandhi of Congress Party who was PM of India😂
@@thanotoast.5468 but why focus on unnecessary topics
The words 'secular' and 'socialism' should be excluded from the preamble as the insertion is not legally. But power to amend the preamble rest with the Parliament.
Exactly that was unconstitutional
What you know about constitution?
India need to be Hindu Rastra
BJP should immediately undo the 42 nd amendment to the constitution.
When the Congress can add these two words to the preamble of the constitution, retrospectively BJP should declare that amendment null and void and repeal it by bringing in another amendment in this winter session.
For that BJP needs 3/4th majority. BJP doesn't even have a majority of its own
What judge r playing? complete the crime case and send people back home there family first, how didn't do crime but with help of money and political parties such people r behind the bar, complete them first if no such case found even one then judge should discuss this kind of case with lowers, i guess goverment and constitutions is in wrong hand's so such things r happening, if something goes out in constitution then some things again will go good waves of then bad should all so get waves of go understanding.
Secularism is not a bharatiya concept, we believe in sarv dharm samman instead. This two are different concepts. Secular seperates state from religion, and creates a pressure on majority community to suppress it's believes and concepts. On the other hand,India believes in mutual respect.
Kuch bhi 🤬😡😠😠😡😠😠
If u people don't know about constitution then dont keep arguments and judgement y that time 42 amendment had keep secular and socialist and even lots of debate cases are there don't speak stupid is this a joke to remove it so easily.....the people who want to remove it that means they don't want a secular state and there should be a violence in india what that time the people who wrote constitution face it they want to remove india from map such a damage place we are making it