I thought it was very cute how at 4.40 he said the occurrence of the IOD will increase through the effects of "climate change" but doesn't explain a thing about it, just makes a blanket statement using this term as if it's just magic or something. How he explained the IOD was it's affected by the strength of the winds and that can raise the warmer or cooler waters in the ocean creating raising or lowering of air pressure which then can bring wetter or drier conditions in certain parts if the world. Why couldn't he then explain how "climate change" whatever that is, affects the winds that create this IOD effect?
I'm not backing or objecting whether "climate change" is being caused and will cause everything that some say, I think it's not the point of the video and neither what you were asking. But current temperature rise patterns suggest that the current change in climate will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather phenomena; since there is more energy/heat within the atmosphere there's going to be more evaporation over the ocean, forming bigger stronger anticyclone and greater pressure differences and hence stronger winds and rains
@@YellowMilk14 ????? The video is about the IOD ( that is the point ) so it needs to be explained HOW it increases effects of "climate change", you can't just make sweeping statements like that and rely on people to be gullible and sit back and belive this without evidence. What you just did was create a theory without evidence because it suits the climate hoax narrative, you're just like all of the rest of the alarmists out there praying on human fear to win your invisible argument.
@@peterbulloch4328 Hey I didn't see your reply until now. You are right it would be nice of this educational video to further explain that link between the effects of "climate change" to this IOD effect after they mentioned it, but since it is a 5 min. long video on the topic I'm guessing they aided only at explaining WHAT this phenomenon is, instead of all of it's effects and links in the atmospheric dynamics or explaining the WHYs and HOWs; let's say it would also be nice to maybe put some references to those studies the mentioned, same as my comment which I didn't provide any evidence, you are right on that as well, but once again maybe this was an introduction to the topic and it's not the forum or format to discus and analize in details all the scientific evidences or the lack of them that there currently are. In order to further extend the knowledge I got on this topic I went to other sources and search for more papers, to get and explanation, for instance to its link with the climate change. On the other hand I think there is enough scientific evidence and consensus to to write climate change without ironic quotiation marks, as I've implied in my previous comment I didn't even tackle whether it can bring benefits or catastrophe, I think in such a complex topic they -scientists or people interested in the topic- don't even know what WILL happen, but science works like that, let's take the graph form 1:10 of this video for example, from that data the tried to make a pattern and understand what has happened in the past and maybe then why, and thus TRY to predict what will happen in the future. All sciences have worked like that. It is a FACT from data that average temperature is rising, and there's strong evidence that it is due to the effects of man-made extra emissions of greenhouse gases (nature does the major part of the emissions -volcanoes, oceans, etc- but it was also in equilibrium capturing it -forests, oceans, etc- until man-made indutrial era; could it be part of a geological era for example? or the sun is now shining brighter?, maybe, scientists know better and better how the atmosphere from other planets work, and with extra energy you get more extreme phenomena, it is arrogant to think that we as humankind know everything, but there is strong evidence and consesus that current climate change/warming of Earth, and its effects, is due to man-made actions whether this brings benefits or harm -this is more of a political thing-; the thing that they say that we may get to an irreversible tipping point is kind of alarmist, I agree, but as complex as it is to make predictions I think they don't try to win any invisible argument but to just disclose what their science studies say -and, once again, some other scientific research says otherwise, that's how it works- )
Great explanation......... Love from 🇮🇳 India 👍
The most understandable explanation I have seen
Great stuff!
Can you please do one on the polar vortices? Especially covering disruption via SSW events. Thanks.
Edit: What causes an SSW?
Where can I get IOD data? please inform me the website
A Positive IOD in 2019 india faced hudge rain and flood in different state hits farmer's crop very badly situation are very wrosed.
Will you do other videos on the list mentioned in this video
Simple but complete!
Best explanation of IOD
True
great explanation!
Somewhat similar to el Nino and la Nina..
Very good explanation
Why floods in India with the positive phase?
Superb explanation sir..thanks a lot.
I thought it was very cute how at 4.40 he said the occurrence of the IOD will increase through the effects of "climate change" but doesn't explain a thing about it, just makes a blanket statement using this term as if it's just magic or something. How he explained the IOD was it's affected by the strength of the winds and that can raise the warmer or cooler waters in the ocean creating raising or lowering of air pressure which then can bring wetter or drier conditions in certain parts if the world. Why couldn't he then explain how "climate change" whatever that is, affects the winds that create this IOD effect?
I'm not backing or objecting whether "climate change" is being caused and will cause everything that some say, I think it's not the point of the video and neither what you were asking. But current temperature rise patterns suggest that the current change in climate will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather phenomena; since there is more energy/heat within the atmosphere there's going to be more evaporation over the ocean, forming bigger stronger anticyclone and greater pressure differences and hence stronger winds and rains
@@YellowMilk14 ????? The video is about the IOD ( that is the point ) so it needs to be explained HOW it increases effects of "climate change", you can't just make sweeping statements like that and rely on people to be gullible and sit back and belive this without evidence. What you just did was create a theory without evidence because it suits the climate hoax narrative, you're just like all of the rest of the alarmists out there praying on human fear to win your invisible argument.
@@peterbulloch4328 Hey I didn't see your reply until now. You are right it would be nice of this educational video to further explain that link between the effects of "climate change" to this IOD effect after they mentioned it, but since it is a 5 min. long video on the topic I'm guessing they aided only at explaining WHAT this phenomenon is, instead of all of it's effects and links in the atmospheric dynamics or explaining the WHYs and HOWs; let's say it would also be nice to maybe put some references to those studies the mentioned, same as my comment which I didn't provide any evidence, you are right on that as well, but once again maybe this was an introduction to the topic and it's not the forum or format to discus and analize in details all the scientific evidences or the lack of them that there currently are. In order to further extend the knowledge I got on this topic I went to other sources and search for more papers, to get and explanation, for instance to its link with the climate change.
On the other hand I think there is enough scientific evidence and consensus to to write climate change without ironic quotiation marks, as I've implied in my previous comment I didn't even tackle whether it can bring benefits or catastrophe, I think in such a complex topic they -scientists or people interested in the topic- don't even know what WILL happen, but science works like that, let's take the graph form 1:10 of this video for example, from that data the tried to make a pattern and understand what has happened in the past and maybe then why, and thus TRY to predict what will happen in the future. All sciences have worked like that. It is a FACT from data that average temperature is rising, and there's strong evidence that it is due to the effects of man-made extra emissions of greenhouse gases (nature does the major part of the emissions -volcanoes, oceans, etc- but it was also in equilibrium capturing it -forests, oceans, etc- until man-made indutrial era; could it be part of a geological era for example? or the sun is now shining brighter?, maybe, scientists know better and better how the atmosphere from other planets work, and with extra energy you get more extreme phenomena, it is arrogant to think that we as humankind know everything, but there is strong evidence and consesus that current climate change/warming of Earth, and its effects, is due to man-made actions whether this brings benefits or harm -this is more of a political thing-; the thing that they say that we may get to an irreversible tipping point is kind of alarmist, I agree, but as complex as it is to make predictions I think they don't try to win any invisible argument but to just disclose what their science studies say -and, once again, some other scientific research says otherwise, that's how it works- )