Well, FIRST THING FIRST, There is something missing in the readiness. We are lacking sailor enlistment these days. No one seems to enlist. HOW CAN WE BE READY? From 1901 to 1992, we enlisted Filipino sailors. They are excellent and trusted sailors. Why don't we enlist them again TO FILL THE GAPS? That is a historical 91 years enlistment. OR, give more incentives to attract enlistment? You have to solve this puzzles before anything else. "At the end of the 2023 fiscal year (September 2023), three branches reported falling short of their recruitment goals: the Navy was at 60% of its target" That's very low indeed.
Selective service registration enforcement . And poor leadership and recruitment incentives, vs private sector, letting people in with questionable credentials and security clearances
The people making decisions thought it was more important to cater to woke ideology than have a functioning military. They're reaping the fruit of that decision making process now.
Its a bit complicated with multiple causes for the decline in enlistment. Tighter civilian job market attracting the more desirable candidates away from choosing military service, military compensation has not been keeping up with inflation and civilian pay (especially in the lower enlisted paygrades). Plus the services operate in a much more challenging media environment with respect to marketing to potential recruits. There's a lot more information available to potential recruits that could be prejudicial against choosing to enlist. Consider how many enlisted in the past ended up hating that decision, except now, they would be more likely to learn about the negative aspects that would be deal breakers. Plus the DoD ban on using Tik Tok has hamstrung its recruiting efforts. Recruiters have to meet the people they want to recruit where they are. And today its Tik Tok and other social media and streaming platforms. And the Navy is a service that deploys and operates at sea away from home. Covid has a had a more negative impact on naval service than the other services. You had ships operating at sea for months and some up to a year without any port visits. And the incident of suicides at several shipyards hasn't helped with its image or with retention.
@dmac7128 But it's all about leadership. Young people are losing interest in joining the military. The pay, benefits, and future in military careers are not promising. Too much politics and sensitivity on gender issues. More and more women are running a position destined for tough men. I predicted in the future that military careers would become like agriculture businesses, but no one would like to pick tomatoes and beans (only foreign migrants do this job). Similar to teachers' and nurses career, they do a lot, but money is not there to support their families. This recruitment will be gloomed and doomed if we don't pay attention. The world is sick, WAR IS LOOMING.
@@amunra5330 It's not just Taiwan, It's all the those nation's territorial waters in the South China Sea that China is claiming to own; Japan and South Korea are in particularly precarious positions. Plus they will Turn Taiwan into an aircraft carrier/port to force its claims even further.
@@amunra5330 Because the Chinese COMMUNIST Party has a bad record of imprisoning and killing people, stealing lands, sinking economies, spreading lies and viruses, selling fakes.
@@amunra5330 Look at what the PRC does to their own big entrepreneurs like Jack Ma. and look at what they are already doing to Hong Kong before they even take total control.
I really don't understand. During World War II, China and the U.S. worked together to defeat Japan, and the two countries are separated by the Pacific Ocean, with no direct threats or conflicts between them. In fact, the U.S. has military bases all around China, in places like Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines. So why is there still talk of war? Wouldn't peace be better for everyone?
In the 1980s, defense spending was around 6 percent of GDP. We had 15 carriers, close to 600 ships and a dozen shipyards to sustain them during Adm Lehman's time. We had a credible force of deterrence against the Soviet Union. Contrast that with today. We barely maintain a force of 300 ships many of which are aging fast, they are decommissioning faster than new ones can be bult. The development and procurement system is still broken. And the number of shipyards is down to 4 with a hollowed out shipbuilding workforce. How can that be a credible deterrent? I got the gist of the interview is that the navy has to make itself ready for war with the force is has by 2027 with the resources that it has. But she admits that there are deficiencies that she won't be able correct by then. So, how can the navy really be ready for war? Its as if one thinks that they could be ready for a gunfight but only have a knife.
Read the plan. Makes sense, it addresses the major problems facing the Navy. Now, will the House of Representatives pass a budget. (Typical question concerning autonomous systems. What happens when your satellite communication is destroyed? They, Ukraine, are not winning the war.)
Basically outsourcing is coming back to bite us? The Navy has pissed away so much talent that if they did dig out of this, they would eventually end up back were they started.
Hi usa centerl comand bydaway 10 unbuyed companies buying 100 100 percent shares ownership buying and 10 companies 100 100 percent shares ownership given usa chief of nevil operations. Ok usa centerl comand 〽️ 💐
These interviews and Pentagon press conferences are such a waste of time. It is the same ol BS answers, like in sports. Such as-- We need to keep our eyes on the ball. We need to strive for X while at the same time maintaining Z. We need to do more with less. We need to get on it, and exceed expectations with the task, while also looking after the well being of our troops and not getting them burned out.... etc.
@@noahway13no, because the odds of a woman getting to her position without specific goals of promoting more women for the sake of promoting more women is extremely unlikely
Germany Electric Engeineering Technick very good and Rodoffe Bosch 😮USA ''''😮💨😮💨Don't understand why ark only Me'' Affrica sure m 😂😂Smart more Sorf Crazy
Great day from dangrek mountain capital hill of Krung Preah Beida Sung Khmer-Thai. The only future dragonfly capital hill of Asia 🌏 that going to have the largest airport and airbase for Boeing and air force direct fly from all G7 countries members and korea and Thailand Philippines Indonesia Myanmar and their people living up to 1 millions foreigners people and business and working and business and investing and largest theme park and biggest stadium for FIFA and largest shooting ranges and largest community products village in Asia 🌏 for future tourists destination more 5 millions people per year to visit our capital.
Thank you very much Seth Jones and Lisa Franchetti.
A degree In journalism😮
That’s what stands out to as a PR Officer with probably an Intelligence background, using a term project 33 is concerning.
I like her. Thanks for the interview.
Thank you for posting this great interview. TH-cam is a wild place lol.
Well, FIRST THING FIRST, There is something missing in the readiness.
We are lacking sailor enlistment these days. No one seems to enlist. HOW CAN WE BE READY?
From 1901 to 1992, we enlisted Filipino sailors. They are excellent and trusted sailors. Why don't we enlist them again TO FILL THE GAPS? That is a historical 91 years enlistment.
OR, give more incentives to attract enlistment?
You have to solve this puzzles before anything else.
"At the end of the 2023 fiscal year (September 2023), three branches reported falling short of their recruitment goals: the Navy was at 60% of its target"
That's very low indeed.
Selective service registration enforcement . And poor leadership and recruitment incentives, vs private sector, letting people in with questionable credentials and security clearances
The people making decisions thought it was more important to cater to woke ideology than have a functioning military. They're reaping the fruit of that decision making process now.
DEI whether real or fake is a driving factor in my opinion. The same reason she is in the position she is in. Just ridiculous
Its a bit complicated with multiple causes for the decline in enlistment. Tighter civilian job market attracting the more desirable candidates away from choosing military service, military compensation has not been keeping up with inflation and civilian pay (especially in the lower enlisted paygrades). Plus the services operate in a much more challenging media environment with respect to marketing to potential recruits. There's a lot more information available to potential recruits that could be prejudicial against choosing to enlist. Consider how many enlisted in the past ended up hating that decision, except now, they would be more likely to learn about the negative aspects that would be deal breakers. Plus the DoD ban on using Tik Tok has hamstrung its recruiting efforts. Recruiters have to meet the people they want to recruit where they are. And today its Tik Tok and other social media and streaming platforms.
And the Navy is a service that deploys and operates at sea away from home. Covid has a had a more negative impact on naval service than the other services. You had ships operating at sea for months and some up to a year without any port visits. And the incident of suicides at several shipyards hasn't helped with its image or with retention.
@dmac7128 But it's all about leadership. Young people are losing interest in joining the military. The pay, benefits, and future in military careers are not promising. Too much politics and sensitivity on gender issues.
More and more women are running a position destined for tough men.
I predicted in the future that military careers would become like agriculture businesses, but no one would like to pick tomatoes and beans (only foreign migrants do this job). Similar to teachers' and nurses career, they do a lot, but money is not there to support their families.
This recruitment will be gloomed and doomed if we don't pay attention.
The world is sick, WAR IS LOOMING.
Very capable and competent CNO.
Big picture, Taiwan under PRC control would be a very bad thing.
Why?
@@amunra5330 It's not just Taiwan, It's all the those nation's territorial waters in the South China Sea that China is claiming to own; Japan and South Korea are in particularly precarious positions. Plus they will Turn Taiwan into an aircraft carrier/port to force its claims even further.
@@amunra5330 Because the Chinese COMMUNIST Party has a bad record of imprisoning and killing people, stealing lands, sinking economies, spreading lies and viruses, selling fakes.
@@amunra5330 Look at what the PRC does to their own big entrepreneurs like Jack Ma. and look at what they are already doing to Hong Kong before they even take total control.
Ship Yard jobs a very few and good luck getting the State to build roads to accommodate a shipyard.
Generals and admirals are more look like politicians rather than soldiers.
I really don't understand. During World War II, China and the U.S. worked together to defeat Japan, and the two countries are separated by the Pacific Ocean, with no direct threats or conflicts between them. In fact, the U.S. has military bases all around China, in places like Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines. So why is there still talk of war? Wouldn't peace be better for everyone?
because the real china is taiwan... the china today is a communist pro Soviet...
On paper, yes. All it takes is one aggressor nation, then everyone has to grow their military.
In the 1980s, defense spending was around 6 percent of GDP. We had 15 carriers, close to 600 ships and a dozen shipyards to sustain them during Adm Lehman's time. We had a credible force of deterrence against the Soviet Union.
Contrast that with today. We barely maintain a force of 300 ships many of which are aging fast, they are decommissioning faster than new ones can be bult. The development and procurement system is still broken. And the number of shipyards is down to 4 with a hollowed out shipbuilding workforce. How can that be a credible deterrent?
I got the gist of the interview is that the navy has to make itself ready for war with the force is has by 2027 with the resources that it has. But she admits that there are deficiencies that she won't be able correct by then. So, how can the navy really be ready for war? Its as if one thinks that they could be ready for a gunfight but only have a knife.
Evolution of Doctrine experiment Doctrine monitor awareness Better perspective robotic infrastructure replicate initiative sharing and scaling continue Resolution analyse update on Artificial intelligence potential weapon testing
Read the plan. Makes sense, it addresses the major problems facing the Navy. Now, will the House of Representatives pass a budget. (Typical question concerning autonomous systems. What happens when your satellite communication is destroyed? They, Ukraine, are not winning the war.)
YOU make sure your republican constituents uphold THEIR end of the bargain instead of allowing He who must not be named to torpedo the bill.
Sailors are complaining about her
Basically outsourcing is coming back to bite us? The Navy has pissed away so much talent that if they did dig out of this, they would eventually end up back were they started.
What you do get paid for putting out a picture of somebody concept
Hi usa centerl comand bydaway 10 unbuyed companies buying 100 100 percent shares ownership buying and 10 companies 100 100 percent shares ownership given usa chief of nevil operations. Ok usa centerl comand 〽️ 💐
So she's going to personally rebuild the north stream 2, very good.
More Engineers, Sailors, and Ships! More control over supply chain
She has no idea what the navy is like
These interviews and Pentagon press conferences are such a waste of time. It is the same ol BS answers, like in sports. Such as-- We need to keep our eyes on the ball. We need to strive for X while at the same time maintaining Z. We need to do more with less. We need to get on it, and exceed expectations with the task, while also looking after the well being of our troops and not getting them burned out.... etc.
😳 lots of talking but nothing of substance. But, softball questions.
Academic Institution
She should have a rank of e4
Because you can't follow the deeper concepts?
@@noahway13no, because the odds of a woman getting to her position without specific goals of promoting more women for the sake of promoting more women is extremely unlikely
She sucks as a leader
You are dismissed
Germany Electric Engeineering Technick very good and Rodoffe Bosch 😮USA ''''😮💨😮💨Don't understand why ark only Me''
Affrica sure m 😂😂Smart more Sorf Crazy
She must know she is underqualified for this position, compared to her peers, except to promote wokeness.
Strange assessment , you showed your cards with that statement.
She commanded combat and staff units. Her peers and superiors must know otherwise.
What gives you that idea? Make makes her underqualified?
Great day from dangrek mountain capital hill of Krung Preah Beida Sung Khmer-Thai. The only future dragonfly capital hill of Asia 🌏 that going to have the largest airport and airbase for Boeing and air force direct fly from all G7 countries members and korea and Thailand Philippines Indonesia Myanmar and their people living up to 1 millions foreigners people and business and working and business and investing and largest theme park and biggest stadium for FIFA and largest shooting ranges and largest community products village in Asia 🌏 for future tourists destination more 5 millions people per year to visit our capital.