Professor, If the cause of the variability is both internal and external. Does this diagnostic technique still work? Is there and difference in the result if there is a predominance of one of the factors (internal compared to external) Thank you in advance for your answer. (Belgium Europe)
yes, although the bigger the 'noise' (=external) the less well it will work. I'm assuming that you mean 'deterministic signal plus measurement noise'. If what you mean is that the system is *driven* (causally) by external noise, then that's different. Adding casual noise can actually change the dynamics of the system. But the diagnostic technique should still work.
@@uclamodelingclass3003 I have attended all the lectures (#72). They are very interesting and very engaging and well given. I can only recommend them to everyone. Many thanks professor !
Thankyou
Professor,
If the cause of the variability is both internal and external.
Does this diagnostic technique still work?
Is there and difference in the result if there is a predominance of one of the factors (internal compared to external)
Thank you in advance for your answer.
(Belgium Europe)
yes, although the bigger the 'noise' (=external) the less well it will work. I'm assuming that you mean 'deterministic signal plus measurement noise'. If what you mean is that the system is *driven* (causally) by external noise, then that's different. Adding casual noise can actually change the dynamics of the system. But the diagnostic technique should still work.
@@uclamodelingclass3003
I have attended all the lectures (#72).
They are very interesting and very engaging and well given.
I can only recommend them to everyone.
Many thanks professor !
@@lucvelghe7330 thanks so much!!