India me log kehte hai ki men and women are equal, even article 14 says so , But when it comes to some offence , we tend to forget those values..funny & strange
I am nationalist ... Pakistan is terroristan... But on this issue Pakistani Law was best... Death sentence for both wife and other man... And same law should be made if husband cheats wife... See equality , ethics , morals all are protected...
equality shud b everwhr den..men shud cud 4 women take care of4 kids..husbnds shud take care of their own parents rather dan puting d burden on wives...y shud women go to husndz house after marraige.i know dese r not rules..and in tennis nly 3 sets 4 women..EQUALITY SHUD B EVRYWHR!
Beat the competition with Study-IQ PEN DRIVE & TABLET courses, To Buy call 95-8004-8004 or 7291059476 or visit - www.studyiq.com Join TELEGRAM group of Study IQ - t.me/Studyiqeducation Follow Dr Gaurav Garg on Facebook - goo.gl/xqLaQm UPSC/IAS past papers questions - goo.gl/eqSWHC UPSC/IAS Burning Issues analysis- goo.gl/TLm98i Environment and Ecology for UPSC - goo.gl/NVLdMi SSC CGL + IBPS Quantitative tricks - goo.gl/4BBEXs English Vocabulary - goo.gl/G9e04H Reasoning tricks for Bank PO + SSC CGL- goo.gl/a68WRN Error spotting / Sentence correction goo.gl/6RbdjC Static GK complete- goo.gl/kB0uAo Complete GK + Current Affairs for all exams- goo.gl/MKEoLy World History - UPSC / IAS - goo.gl/kwU9jC Learn English for SSC CGL, Bank PO goo.gl/MoL2it Science and Technology for UPSC/IAS - goo.gl/Jm4h8j Philosophy for UPSC/IAS - goo.gl/FH9p3n Yojana Magazine analysis -goo.gl/8oK1gy History for SSC CGL + Railways NTPC - goo.gl/7939eV
Study IQ education koi call hi attend nhi krta..muje pen drive course cjaiye but kuch doubt h unko clear kro....if it is possible than call me 9050544044
Question you asked! It will be a rape by victim as it is neither a adultery nor a rape by husbands consent, it is an individually decided rape by that particular person.
First of all ,if it's committed with out the consent of wife ,it can't be termed as adultery rather it would be a rape ..well if wife is in comma and she happens to be sexually assaulted in front of her husband so court can take cognizance of her husband's statement and can charge M under section 376 ..where as victim her self is not aware of the situation and no one literally witnessed it ,in that case ,nothing can be done unless there is strong circumstantial evidence which can corroborate the charges made against M..thanks for such explanation. .
The Best solution is not to get married.problem. a girl can have as many relationship and boys can have tension free life without worrying about faithfulness
@@dhanaseelanm2969 ye sab angrezo ka kanoon hai, Bharat ko gulaam banane ke liye sab raddi hai jo aaj bhi chal raha hai, ek aur accha upaaye hai ki ek anaath bacche ko goad lele
hello mam thanks for such knowledgeable video.u asked if a case appears where husband wife both have no consent and wife was in coma where she can't feel anything here i guess the crime is rape coz even if c can't feel anything the fact won't change that her body was used by a person without her permission should fall under rape ipc 375....and plz keep making new videos.....will wait for next one.
This law seems to be in favor of women. If wife and M agreed to be in a physical relationship and if wife is not considered as guilty then even M should not be considered as guilty. However, husband can lodge a case against both of them and use it for the grounds of divorce. In such divorce cases wife should not get any compensation from husband's salary or income. Above all, we live in a free country and having an affair outside marriage should not be considered as a crime by any party or law, but can be used for the grounds of separation and divorce
Women is also a human being ...she is not a “private property of someone” ....and it should be recognised by Supreme Court ...this is one of the reason why women in the 21 century have degraded status...patrichy should be remove from the society ....guys raise your voice against these kind of inequalities
Answer to question asked - No offence can be proved since wife doesn't have consent nor she knows that wrong has happened to her if she is in vegetative state .
I think this defies the fundamental of equality in our constitution. Both the people involved in the unlawful and conscious relationship should be considered guilty. Secondly, there should also be a provision made for the wife to press adultery charges against her husband if he maintains sexual relations with a second woman. Thirdly, the foundation for this law that the wife is the "property" of the husband seems incorrect. Humans can't and should not be considered property.
I am amazed by this law. Firstly if a women or a man being in a relationship as a couple, and it is proved that one of them is doing adultery, then there should no discrimination, both of them is guilty and should be punished. Either wife or husband.
▶In the above case when no one have consent about the act both are victims; that's why two charges will be file against third man(M) under section 376 of IPC for rape and under section 497 of IPC for adultery.
Evidently, it is rape. Section 375 doesn't talk about feeling of victim at the time of crime. Instance:- Rape with minor girls, who can presume the feeling of that victim.
No mam this is inequality.,.....for those men which is trapped by women for her sexual desire. Suppose if women force men for sexual interaction by her husband consult and blame other men for money etc if this is planned then how we can say that this is equality for both under this section.
Last case comes under sec. 497(adultery). women was not in a condition to tell her situation as she is in coma..and acc. To court husband becomes her natural guardian then he can file a case under sec. 497. Its my opinion..
If any adultery done with wife without her consent and without any feeling... Then two situations are possible ... 1. If it happens in front of husband..then he can file a case against M under section 497 2 if it happens.. And husband is not aware of this act... Then no case will be filed bcoz no one is aware of this act as w can not feel this act.
First of all ,if it's committed with out the consent of wife ,it can't be termed as adultery rather it would be a rape ..well if wife is in comma and she happens to be sexually assaulted in front of her husband so court can take cognizance of her husband's statement provided there is some circumstantial evidence and can charge M under section 376 ..where as victim her self is not aware of the situation and no one literally witnessed it ,in that case ,nothing can be done unless there is strong circumstantial evidence which can corroborate the charges made against M if found during examination ..
If adultery happened with woman when she is unaware about it or when sh is in comma no matters ,it is violation of her rights and dignity and also when there is no consent of husband. So in my opinion this situation should also be fall under 497/376 of IPC.
#Study iq education The answer of your ques is - if the women doesn't having feeling about the sexual intercource and M had done intercource without her consent then it comes under ipc 376 ( rape ).
If wife is in coma and husband has said No then also it's Adultery because consent of Husband matters and it's still not given. If wife is husband's property then husband has the right to own the property and has to give a consent before anyone touches her.
In the last case it was mentioned that whenever there is not a consent of both husband and wife.... So simply it implies to all the rape cases vistimised some married women..and if the victim is not in a position to give statement then it is sure that there should and must be a special investigation of the whole case covering all the past incidents ... With this law indian judicial system has proved how wastefully complicated they can be in framing such a conditional and confidential matter into crime against any innocent man ... It remindes of the case with rustom pavri.... At last it is to duty of our nation to form simplified and open ended constitution to get true judgement leaving away all the self made assumtions...
In coma...c is not in her sense ...that doesn't mean .her (U/A-21).. right to live with dignity will be encroached by the third person that is M.. So it will considered as an offence...
Ms.Sneha.Singh very informative !!!! Ma'am, I'm looking forward to more videos like this which is content rich and clearly communicated. Keep up the good work and post some videos on Article 19 also.
M will be charged with rape charges, as W is in guardianship of H and M has tampered it. And one more thing when someone is in vegetative state, this doesn't mean she has given the consent.
A woman in coma still has her fundamental rights intact (I guess even a dead body has some kind of fundamental rights as you can not take their organs with his/her own or family consent). So if there are enough evidences available and a case is file by someone on her behalf, the culprit can be prosecuted.
agree...u r talking aout equlity in pakistan ...that's great ...then y a men allowed to marry more than one women in islam..?? it's ur constitution or it's islamic rule ...? it's islamic rule i think ..beacuse the same thing happen in indian muslim community .! ..and y women is not allowed to marry more than one men..?. YOUR COMMUNITY IS PURE MAN DOMINANT COMMUNITY....AND UR TALKING ABOUT EQUALITY COOL.
Hey hey tareeq jameel first of all , i have no faith in god and i also don't know about the Allah's Commandments. and also don't want know about all this things. QURAN GEEETA keep this all thing side. Now, what akashakki is saying is actually the things happen in your community..THE MARRIAGE ISSUE ..AND TRIPLE TALAK ...IS THIS ALSO COME IN Allah's Commandments..?? IF YES, THEN WHAT Allah's Commandments FOR WIFE IN THESE ISSUE ....!!!! IN INDIA IPC SECTION 497 IS REMOVED ON THE CONCEPT OF WIFE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.. AND INDIA IS COUNTRY OF ALL COMMUNITY ..SO WHOEVER YOU ARE MUSLIM HINDU U HAVE TO FOLLOW THIS...we are here discussing about the EQUALITY AND RIGHTS.. not talking about Any GOD Commandments...
As said ... Husband is considered as a guardian of wife .. then it is the responsibility of hubby to take care of wife emotionally and physically .. सौ की सीधी बात ये है कि जब आप खुद को उसका gurdian मानते हो तो आपको अपना दिल काफी बड़ा रखना चाहिए अपनी वाइफ के लिए .. ओ आपके साथ realtionship में खुश नही है तो as a guradian it is your responsibility to give her a happy life . My request to all the men who are saying that बड़ा बकवास law है ये ..अपना दिल और सोच दोनों को बड़ा और ऊँचा करना होगा ... क्यों कि अब आप डंडे के बल पर औरत को अपनी कैद में किसी भी हालत में नही रख सकते .. it is very good law .. और इस लॉ से छोटी विचार धारा वाले उन सभी मर्द जाति के "L" लग गए 👍😂😂😂😂😂 So now all the men have only two choices ... Either they should try to make their thinking pure and holy .. or become mr. "M" 😂😂😂 and most of the men of our country are already mr. M ... 😂😂😂😂
same punishment should be given to both becoz its against d right to equality and husband should also be punished for adultery this section need to be amend
mam as per my discretion this is a case of rape .because without women's consent if someone tries to have sexual relationship with her then that is rape wheteher she is in comma or in full consciousness.no woman want her to be raped.so i think it should come under a offence.if this is not an offence then our laws should be amendee..
I found this law as stupid. Women's a wife property? So our law perpetrates patriarchy. But the law is heavily biased against men!! Women can easily get into sexual relationship with other men but the poor husband cant do any thing. How is consent by the husband proved? What if he backtracks in Court? What if this law is used by a husband and wife to frame an innocent man? Sexual relationship should be a private matter. If there is adultery, then definitely it will lead to divorce. So what's the use of this law? And why is it so biased and anachronistic?
Bhawesh Thapa.. And definitely after the SC's recent judgement over Privacy, what about Women's bodily integrity? What about her right as an individual??.. I think whole Laws on these issue need to be simplified and rationalised otherwise, as you said, can violate one's FR and Natural rights. And obviously, can be used to frame some innocent person. Thank you.
Vaise hum log subah sham equaily ki baat krty hain to ek hi crime ki punishment dono k liye alag alag kyu...? Aur agr husbnd adultry krta hai husbnd k against kuch nhi kr sakty.. Tabhi log itne extra marital affair chala rahy. Shadi shadi na hoke majak bn gyee hai..mostly in metro cities. I think laws should be sme fr everyone..nd a bit strict for such type of crimes.
Sabse pahele baat ki marriage karane ke bad koi bhi ho chahe men ho ya women and agar wo extra maretial affairs rakhata/rakhati hain and apne partner ke saath cheating karat/karati hain to use heavy se heavy punishment diya jana chahiye. Because, he/she koi kou right nahi hain ki marraige institution me aane ke bad wo apne spouse ke saath dhokadari kare and apne spose ko mentally, physicially, emotionally and economically destroyed karade.
Very nice video ma'am . Your voice is very clear and you cover all information. Keep posted such videos especially the one oh how reservation started in India and how it spread and what can be possible remedy. I m looking forward to watch video on this topic.
.I absolutely did not understand what judges wanted to convey, Is it really great to be intimate with any other spouse? Marriage is a matter of chastity, patience loyalty which u keep for ur spouse, Being compassion towards spouse is biggest thing.
Agar M , H ki permission ke bina W SE physical relation rakhata hai to M & W dono ko saja milni chahiye. kyoki W apne husband ka bharosa todti hai. husbund and wife ka relation Jo hota hai vo bilkul ek dusre k bharose SE chalta lekin donomese agar koi bhi iss bharose ke todta hai to use jarur saja milni chahiye....
In last case.. if H and W both denies but M does .. or W . Active hai. In this case Rape Hoga under section 376 against M not against H. 2. Option ..if W non-active h ya coma me h ..then yeh case adultery Ka hai..under section 497 of IPC of sath sath rape Ka v hoga against M. BCOZ H is a natural guardian of W.
IN 4Th case ....M would be charged with IPC 497 and IPC 376. LETS SAY she is in comma (for as of now) 1.she hasn't given her consent to M to perform intercourse with her. 2.she is still his property, and his property was being tempered by M (as u said in metaphor). SO THAT WAY HE IS LIABLE TO BE PUNISHED BY BOTH IPC.
If a sexual intercourse occurred with a women without her consent,then it must be considered as rape!Here the consent of the husband or the state of woman(whether she is in coma or not) doesn't even matter.
I think madam this case no offences under IPC Because both of them no consent and his wife also coma . Thank you Madam this video really helpful for law students.
THANKS ALOT MA`AM VERY INTRIGUING INFO...AS MY VIEW WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF BOTH HUSBAND AND WIFE ..IF SEX IS DONE THEN IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS RAPE ..SHE DOES NOT FEEL, THAT DOES NOT MEAN SHE IS NOT RAPED.. LIKE IN A DRUNKEN STATE CONSENT OF A WOMEN IS NOT COUNTED VALID SO IT LEADS TO RAPE TOO.... A WOMEN SHOULD COMPLAINT UNDER 497 BECAUSE SHE HAS ALSO HER EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS OVER HUSBAND IN CASE OF ADULTERY DONE BY HUSBAND..HERE TWO CONCEPTS ARISE ONE IS EQUALITY AND ANOTHER IS WOMEN EMPOWERMENT.....SO JUDICIARY SHOULD BE JUDICIOUS...OR JUST FOLLOW UK...TO EMPOWER PERSONAL CHOICES ...THANK YOU...IT WAS REALLY NICE AND INFORMATIVE AND THOUGHT PROVOCATIVE LECTURE.....
W is in comma so her consent is not there similarly H also did not consent to the act..(connivance) therefore the offence of adultery is not committed on the part of W. As far as H is concerned, his consent would have had amounted to rape but since there wasn't any so the offence of rape is not committed (in the sense where H plans with M). Now the question as to who is the victim for the said commission of act.. I think it should be both the husband (H) and wife(W). It shall amount to the offence of rape as against the wife and if we consider the logic given by the court in one of the cases where metaphorically wife is described as a property of husband and any act transgressing the exclusive right of the husband over the property (wife) shall be an offence against the husband and if so he shall have a remedy (ubi jus ibi remedium).
Its is considered as rape then even if woman is not aware of it. This will feel like if on anesthesia you donot sense your hand and doctor can also cut it off just because you hadn't sensed it.
logically and leagaly at 4th point M(Pervert) is responsible as a rape charge without the will of W here victim is both W (as been raped) H(Being a guardian)
WATCH ALL LEGAL GK VIDEOS, CLICK HERE
th-cam.com/play/PLpuxPG4TUOR7aRfV4kee9bJ_hkjppViGe.html&disable_polymer=true
Study IQ education great ! Upload more videos like this do girls those who were unware of this know this law and take advantage of it !!! Great .
Plz ans your last ques....about ipc 497 when both are not consent
Mam aap thoda jyada description kra kijiye like.. Varun dhawan sir..
If she is in vegetative state then she cant give consent tht dnst matter she feeled anything or not it is a rape ...under indian law
@@ananddongare9968 it is a rape
India me log kehte hai ki men and women are equal, even article 14 says so , But when it comes to some offence , we tend to forget those values..funny & strange
I am nationalist ... Pakistan is terroristan... But on this issue Pakistani Law was best...
Death sentence for both wife and other man... And same law should be made if husband cheats wife...
See equality , ethics , morals all are protected...
equality shud b everwhr den..men shud cud 4 women take care of4 kids..husbnds shud take care of their own parents rather dan puting d burden on wives...y shud women go to husndz house after marraige.i know dese r not rules..and in tennis nly 3 sets 4 women..EQUALITY SHUD B EVRYWHR!
Beat the competition with Study-IQ PEN DRIVE & TABLET courses, To Buy call 95-8004-8004 or 7291059476 or visit - www.studyiq.com
Join TELEGRAM group of Study IQ -
t.me/Studyiqeducation
Follow Dr Gaurav Garg on Facebook - goo.gl/xqLaQm
UPSC/IAS past papers questions - goo.gl/eqSWHC
UPSC/IAS Burning Issues analysis- goo.gl/TLm98i
Environment and Ecology for UPSC - goo.gl/NVLdMi
SSC CGL + IBPS Quantitative tricks - goo.gl/4BBEXs
English Vocabulary - goo.gl/G9e04H
Reasoning tricks for Bank PO + SSC CGL- goo.gl/a68WRN
Error spotting / Sentence correction goo.gl/6RbdjC
Static GK complete- goo.gl/kB0uAo
Complete GK + Current Affairs for all exams- goo.gl/MKEoLy
World History - UPSC / IAS - goo.gl/kwU9jC
Learn English for SSC CGL, Bank PO goo.gl/MoL2it
Science and Technology for UPSC/IAS - goo.gl/Jm4h8j
Philosophy for UPSC/IAS - goo.gl/FH9p3n
Yojana Magazine analysis -goo.gl/8oK1gy
History for SSC CGL + Railways NTPC - goo.gl/7939eV
Study IQ education koi call hi attend nhi krta..muje pen drive course cjaiye but kuch doubt h unko clear kro....if it is possible than call me 9050544044
SUMIT SHARMA I agree
call 7291059476
well explained ...perfect pitch which strikes concept in the exact location of brain....simple but perfect mam
Question you asked!
It will be a rape by victim as it is neither a adultery nor a rape by husbands consent, it is an individually decided rape by that particular person.
First of all ,if it's committed with out the consent of wife ,it can't be termed as adultery rather it would be a rape ..well if wife is in comma and she happens to be sexually assaulted in front of her husband so court can take cognizance of her husband's statement and can charge M under section 376 ..where as victim her self is not aware of the situation and no one literally witnessed it ,in that case ,nothing can be done unless there is strong circumstantial evidence which can corroborate the charges made against M..thanks for such explanation. .
thanks for the input Sudhir
किसी कि जिम्मेदारी लेने की कोई ज़रूरत नहीं है, खुद कमाओ खुद खाओ।
धारा- 497
The Best solution is not to get married.problem. a girl can have as many relationship and boys can have tension free life without worrying about faithfulness
Devine Sky The BEST advice ever.
Thank You
@@dhanaseelanm2969 True beside India is most populated Country ever lol.
@@dhanaseelanm2969 Wow thanks for such fine details I didn't look at it that way.
@@dhanaseelanm2969 ye sab angrezo ka kanoon hai, Bharat ko gulaam banane ke liye sab raddi hai jo aaj bhi chal raha hai, ek aur accha upaaye hai ki ek anaath bacche ko goad lele
Awwaz...
👌👌👌 bohot hi sahajta se explain kiya hai...!
hello mam thanks for such knowledgeable video.u asked if a case appears where husband wife both have no consent and wife was in coma where she can't feel anything here i guess the crime is rape coz even if c can't feel anything the fact won't change that her body was used by a person without her permission should fall under rape ipc 375....and plz keep making new videos.....will wait for next one.
Jhansi Kiran i think section 375 IPC is the right answer
marshal mather ... men even rape a died body of women....then why cant have intrcs with a coma women......
Haa ye shi Kah rhi h kyoki ek women is a human not a thing jisko Kosi bhi tarah touch kiya ja sake
marshal mather u know that tuny ye sbsy chutya comment keya h
Shashi Priyadarshi, ye to kisi aurat ka naam hai😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
This law seems to be in favor of women. If wife and M agreed to be in a physical relationship and if wife is not considered as guilty then even M should not be considered as guilty. However, husband can lodge a case against both of them and use it for the grounds of divorce. In such divorce cases wife should not get any compensation from husband's salary or income. Above all, we live in a free country and having an affair outside marriage should not be considered as a crime by any party or law, but can be used for the grounds of separation and divorce
ankur jain matlab apki wife agar marriage ke bahr affair kare to apko koi problem nai hogi na kunki ap ek free country men reh rahe ho ??????
Women is also a human being ...she is not a “private property of someone” ....and it should be recognised by Supreme Court ...this is one of the reason why women in the 21 century have degraded status...patrichy should be remove from the society ....guys raise your voice against these kind of inequalities
Answer to question asked - No offence can be proved since wife doesn't have consent nor she knows that wrong has happened to her if she is in vegetative state .
I think this defies the fundamental of equality in our constitution. Both the people involved in the unlawful and conscious relationship should be considered guilty. Secondly, there should also be a provision made for the wife to press adultery charges against her husband if he maintains sexual relations with a second woman.
Thirdly, the foundation for this law that the wife is the "property" of the husband seems incorrect. Humans can't and should not be considered property.
I am amazed by this law. Firstly if a women or a man being in a relationship as a couple, and it is proved that one of them is doing adultery, then there should no discrimination, both of them is guilty and should be punished. Either wife or husband.
mam very nice explanations and ur voice is very clear n cool .
mam ur best orater in case of judicial n law related explanation. Thank you mam
Mam, The Way You Explain is Very Nice
Mam ..you are one of most wonderful teachers ..thanks alot
▶In the above case when no one have consent about the act both are victims; that's why two charges will be file against third man(M) under section 376 of IPC for rape and under section 497 of IPC for adultery.
Evidently, it is rape. Section 375 doesn't talk about feeling of victim at the time of crime.
Instance:- Rape with minor girls, who can presume the feeling of that victim.
Miss. Pls continue your lectures, thanks
Lucid explanation...
thank you very much mammm....
I knew only what is sec 497, but nvr go into dept..it's a sea.. thank u for the details
Dear mam you are too good.... You made it easy to me..... Well done.
No mam this is inequality.,.....for those men which is trapped by women for her sexual desire.
Suppose if women force men for sexual interaction by her husband consult and blame other men for money etc if this is planned then how we can say that this is equality for both under this section.
Law Enabled Kyu mam ka nam kharab kar rhe ho
Tej Ram if someone trap a person in a crime then there are other laws to deal with it. Only thing is that one have to prove it.
Tej Ram ग
Tej Ram mutual feel. I feel there are other law for it.
No wander Indian judicial system is one of the meaning less and failed system
In that situation case is of adultry.. rape is not because wife didn't denied that attempt and not able to file complain of rape..
Last case comes under sec. 497(adultery). women was not in a condition to tell her situation as she is in coma..and acc. To court husband becomes her natural guardian then he can file a case under sec. 497. Its my opinion..
If any adultery done with wife without her consent and without any feeling... Then two situations are possible ...
1. If it happens in front of husband..then he can file a case against M under section 497
2 if it happens.. And husband is not aware of this act... Then no case will be filed bcoz no one is aware of this act as w can not feel this act.
thanks deepak for the input
First of all ,if it's committed with out the consent of wife ,it can't be termed as adultery rather it would be a rape ..well if wife is in comma and she happens to be sexually assaulted in front of her husband so court can take cognizance of her husband's statement provided there is some circumstantial evidence and can charge M under section 376 ..where as victim her self is not aware of the situation and no one literally witnessed it ,in that case ,nothing can be done unless there is strong circumstantial evidence which can corroborate the charges made against M if found during examination ..
I WOULD LIKE TO ADD DAT ALONG WITH SEC497 SEC 375 WILL ALSO B THERE
If adultery happened with woman when she is unaware about it or when sh is in comma no matters ,it is violation of her rights and dignity and also when there is no consent of husband.
So in my opinion this situation should also be fall under 497/376 of IPC.
#Study iq education
The answer of your ques is - if the women doesn't having feeling about the sexual intercource and M had done intercource without her consent then it comes under ipc 376 ( rape ).
If wife is in coma and husband has said No then also it's Adultery because consent of Husband matters and it's still not given. If wife is husband's property then husband has the right to own the property and has to give a consent before anyone touches her.
Nyc approach.. And that truth table is awesome to understand the things easily..
Outstanding work...superb explanation...tysm...mam god bless u
कुल मिलाकर औरतों को ही बचाना है। व्यभिचार करने वालों को कड़ी से कड़ी सजा होना चाहिए। चाहे औरत हो या पुरुष। क्योंकि दोनों बराबर है।
Thanks a lot for your valuable discussion regarding 497
crystal clear explanation well done mam!!
BAHUT ACHHA SAMGHAAYA AAPNE THANK YOU
mam reservation kb kyu kaise kis kis provision me diya gya
uske baad kaise ye badhta chla gya
ispr b video bnao ek
and thanks for this
Shimla sir name h ki himachali ho?
Karan Shimla aapne bohot acche topic pe vedio banane request ki hai
Anchal bhardwaj am haryanvi and smt. Shimla is my mother name
Karan Shimla ok
Thank you soo much.. No one teaches like you in detail.. Thanks a lot
In the last case it was mentioned that whenever there is not a consent of both husband and wife....
So simply it implies to all the rape cases vistimised some married women..and if the victim is not in a position to give statement then it is sure that there should and must be a special investigation of the whole case covering all the past incidents ...
With this law indian judicial system has proved how wastefully complicated they can be in framing such a conditional and confidential matter into crime against any innocent man ...
It remindes of the case with rustom pavri....
At last it is to duty of our nation to form simplified and open ended constitution to get true judgement leaving away all the self made assumtions...
Your voice is so nice. ..... So deep....
Mam your voice is too good i am fan of you
Today I know why we r moving back to 17th or 16th centuries...
Or equality wo to kha hai pata hi nahi...
In coma...c is not in her sense ...that doesn't mean .her (U/A-21).. right to live with dignity will be encroached by the third person that is M..
So it will considered as an offence...
Ms.Sneha.Singh very informative !!!! Ma'am, I'm looking forward to more videos like this which is content rich and clearly communicated. Keep up the good work and post some videos on Article 19 also.
Thank you so much to you...for enriching my knowledge...
M will be charged with rape charges, as W is in guardianship of H and M has tampered it.
And one more thing when someone is in vegetative state, this doesn't mean she has given the consent.
A woman in coma still has her fundamental rights intact (I guess even a dead body has some kind of fundamental rights as you can not take their organs with his/her own or family consent). So if there are enough evidences available and a case is file by someone on her behalf, the culprit can be prosecuted.
wow.....beautiful ipc rule
first time pakistan ka rule sabse achha h..
abhishek kumar
Thanks bhai i.am from Pakistan .
Bhai agr ap kehty keh islam ek perfect religion he to muje bahot khushi hoti.
agree...u r talking aout equlity in pakistan ...that's great ...then y a men allowed to marry more than one women in islam..?? it's ur constitution or it's islamic rule ...? it's islamic rule i think ..beacuse the same thing happen in indian muslim community .! ..and y women is not allowed to marry more than one men..?.
YOUR COMMUNITY IS PURE MAN DOMINANT COMMUNITY....AND UR TALKING ABOUT EQUALITY
COOL.
Hey hey tareeq jameel
first of all , i have no faith in god and i also don't know about the Allah's Commandments. and also don't want know about all this things. QURAN GEEETA keep this all thing side.
Now, what akashakki is saying is actually the things happen in your community..THE MARRIAGE ISSUE ..AND TRIPLE TALAK ...IS THIS ALSO COME IN Allah's Commandments..?? IF YES, THEN WHAT Allah's Commandments FOR WIFE IN THESE ISSUE ....!!!! IN INDIA IPC SECTION 497 IS REMOVED ON THE CONCEPT OF WIFE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.. AND INDIA IS COUNTRY OF ALL COMMUNITY ..SO WHOEVER YOU ARE MUSLIM HINDU U HAVE TO FOLLOW THIS...we are here discussing about the EQUALITY AND RIGHTS.. not talking about Any GOD Commandments...
@@Abdul-zg8ph islam or perfect religion lol lol lol lol lol lol
In case if W is in coma or unconsciousness, it must be a case of adultery under section 497 as H is victim in this situation also.
As said ... Husband is considered as a guardian of wife .. then it is the responsibility of hubby to take care of wife emotionally and physically .. सौ की सीधी बात ये है कि जब आप खुद को उसका gurdian मानते हो तो आपको अपना दिल काफी बड़ा रखना चाहिए अपनी वाइफ के लिए .. ओ आपके साथ realtionship में खुश नही है तो as a guradian it is your responsibility to give her a happy life .
My request to all the men who are saying that बड़ा बकवास law है ये ..अपना दिल और सोच दोनों को बड़ा और ऊँचा करना होगा ... क्यों कि अब आप डंडे के बल पर औरत को अपनी कैद में किसी भी हालत में नही रख सकते .. it is very good law .. और इस लॉ से छोटी विचार धारा वाले उन सभी मर्द जाति के "L" लग गए 👍😂😂😂😂😂
So now all the men have only two choices ... Either they should try to make their thinking pure and holy .. or become mr. "M" 😂😂😂 and most of the men of our country are already mr. M ... 😂😂😂😂
Thanks study IQ. Very well explained.
welcome
Yadi W ko feel hi nai hua but agar H ko lagta hai ki galt hua (as per provision of women as property) then H jo hai M ke against case kar sakta hai..
This law should be implemented in India as like France
This incident should be covered under section IPC-420 on woman if Husband is honest for her
it is such a nice info , describe in well manner....
same punishment should be given to both becoz its against d right to equality and husband should also be punished for adultery this section need to be amend
mam as per my discretion this is a case of rape .because without women's consent if someone tries to have sexual relationship with her then that is rape wheteher she is in comma or in full consciousness.no woman want her to be raped.so i think it should come under a offence.if this is not an offence then our laws should be amendee..
I found this law as stupid. Women's a wife property? So our law perpetrates patriarchy. But the law is heavily biased against men!! Women can easily get into sexual relationship with other men but the poor husband cant do any thing.
How is consent by the husband proved? What if he backtracks in Court? What if this law is used by a husband and wife to frame an innocent man? Sexual relationship should be a private matter. If there is adultery, then definitely it will lead to divorce. So what's the use of this law? And why is it so biased and anachronistic?
Bhawesh Thapa.. And definitely after the SC's recent judgement over Privacy, what about Women's bodily integrity? What about her right as an individual??..
I think whole Laws on these issue need to be simplified and rationalised otherwise, as you said, can violate one's FR and Natural rights. And obviously, can be used to frame some innocent person.
Thank you.
Case frame against an innocent person will rape case not an adultery case
In adultery case it is very less chances for husband to prove it
I totally agree 👍
Vaise hum log subah sham equaily ki baat krty hain to ek hi crime ki punishment dono k liye alag alag kyu...? Aur agr husbnd adultry krta hai husbnd k against kuch nhi kr sakty.. Tabhi log itne extra marital affair chala rahy. Shadi shadi na hoke majak bn gyee hai..mostly in metro cities. I think laws should be sme fr everyone..nd a bit strict for such type of crimes.
Sabse pahele baat ki marriage karane ke bad koi bhi ho chahe men ho ya women and agar wo extra maretial affairs rakhata/rakhati hain and apne partner ke saath cheating karat/karati hain to use heavy se heavy punishment diya jana chahiye. Because, he/she koi kou right nahi hain ki marraige institution me aane ke bad wo apne spouse ke saath dhokadari kare and apne spose ko mentally, physicially, emotionally and economically destroyed karade.
very good information madam Ji.
thank you.
even if the woman is in comma , 'M' will be punished becoz he has committed the offence u/s 198.
10:48 madam got emotional
Very nice video ma'am . Your voice is very clear and you cover all information. Keep posted such videos especially the one oh how reservation started in India and how it spread and what can be possible remedy. I m looking forward to watch video on this topic.
awesome explanation Mam... thank you so much..
.I absolutely did not understand what judges wanted to convey, Is it really great to be intimate with any other spouse? Marriage is a matter of chastity, patience loyalty which u keep for ur spouse, Being compassion towards spouse is biggest thing.
Gud evening sir uu videos are very helpful for better understanding of any case .sir plzz kindly upload some more videos to help us
Brilliantly explained. Superb clarity ma'am.
Hi ma'm ,
Have a great good morning. In really your teaching is so good. No doubt you are doing the greatest job. Keep it continue. Thanks
good job Study IQ education......keep up the good work !!!
Agar M , H ki permission ke bina W SE physical relation rakhata hai to M & W dono ko saja milni chahiye.
kyoki W apne husband ka bharosa todti hai. husbund and wife ka relation Jo hota hai vo bilkul ek dusre k bharose SE chalta lekin donomese agar koi bhi iss bharose ke todta hai to use jarur saja milni chahiye....
very nicely explained mam...really helpful in deep understanding the concept.thankyou
Superb expalnation.
Supreme Court thinks women are commodity tabhi aisa law bnaya
Logically - No crime
Legally- Rape case
mam plzz cover all sections and chapters of ipc
Amazing video...
Great explanation......Mam..
In last case.. if H and W both denies but M does .. or W . Active hai. In this case Rape Hoga under section 376 against M not against H.
2. Option ..if W non-active h ya coma me h ..then yeh case adultery Ka hai..under section 497 of IPC of sath sath rape Ka v hoga against M. BCOZ H is a natural guardian of W.
IN 4Th case ....M would be charged with IPC 497 and IPC 376.
LETS SAY she is in comma (for as of now)
1.she hasn't given her consent to M to perform intercourse with her.
2.she is still his property, and his property was being tempered by M (as u said in metaphor).
SO THAT WAY HE IS LIABLE TO BE PUNISHED BY BOTH IPC.
Pakistani law is best, same action both husband and wife
Tanmoy Biswas+ Dude I think you are misleading if death sentence to both husband and wife then what about M ? Is M free ?
Law Enabled your name?
hahahha
Law Enabled-- Let me know what the politicians will do, if it is applied on women also ?🤔
Tanmoy Biswas death is too Harsh...bro
Very comprehensively dealt ..Great
Would have been great, if a wat forward was provided
Thanks
15:15 this act should be considered as rape
And this crime can be done by providing drink with unconsciousness drug in it etc.
Love u ma'am..... I am your great fan now after this chapter great examples
If a sexual intercourse occurred with a women without her consent,then it must be considered as rape!Here the consent of the husband or the state of woman(whether she is in coma or not) doesn't even matter.
I think madam this case no offences under IPC
Because both of them no consent and his wife also coma .
Thank you Madam this video really helpful for law students.
THANKS ALOT MA`AM VERY INTRIGUING INFO...AS MY VIEW WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF BOTH HUSBAND AND WIFE ..IF SEX IS DONE THEN IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS RAPE ..SHE DOES NOT FEEL, THAT DOES NOT MEAN SHE IS NOT RAPED..
LIKE IN A DRUNKEN STATE CONSENT OF A WOMEN IS NOT COUNTED VALID SO IT LEADS TO RAPE TOO....
A WOMEN SHOULD COMPLAINT UNDER 497 BECAUSE SHE HAS ALSO HER EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS OVER HUSBAND IN CASE OF ADULTERY DONE BY HUSBAND..HERE TWO CONCEPTS ARISE ONE IS EQUALITY AND ANOTHER IS WOMEN EMPOWERMENT.....SO JUDICIARY SHOULD BE JUDICIOUS...OR JUST FOLLOW UK...TO EMPOWER PERSONAL CHOICES ...THANK YOU...IT WAS REALLY NICE AND INFORMATIVE AND THOUGHT PROVOCATIVE LECTURE.....
W is in comma so her consent is not there similarly H also did not consent to the act..(connivance) therefore the offence of adultery is not committed on the part of W. As far as H is concerned, his consent would have had amounted to rape but since there wasn't any so the offence of rape is not committed (in the sense where H plans with M). Now the question as to who is the victim for the said commission of act.. I think it should be both the husband (H) and wife(W). It shall amount to the offence of rape as against the wife and if we consider the logic given by the court in one of the cases where metaphorically wife is described as a property of husband and any act transgressing the exclusive right of the husband over the property (wife) shall be an offence against the husband and if so he shall have a remedy (ubi jus ibi remedium).
thank you mam for giving us a such kind if knowledge...
U have marvellous voice
very nice way of teaching. Mam please put sub-titles in English.
Adv Sankhla kyo itna bante ho bhai.
hindi me kya problm hai screenshot le lo english ki.
Great explanation
IPC sec. 375 will be applied on the M in last case
nice mam your voice is very nice here Vandana DEVI ad thanks for good video
For the first time I feel like Pakistan law policy is better in some points
the hospital's security should complain to police where the case of rape will be filed against them..with clear evidence
Its is considered as rape then even if woman is not aware of it. This will feel like if on anesthesia you donot sense your hand and doctor can also cut it off just because you hadn't sensed it.
I am judiciary aspirants,so make a comprehensive lecture,in all subjects....
logically and leagaly at 4th point M(Pervert) is responsible as a rape charge without the will of W
here victim is both W (as been raped) H(Being a guardian)
PAK LAw is Best Example of Eqality nd Law
Very impressive and informative ma'am...Thank you so much 🙂