Visualizing the Planck Length. Why is it the Smallest Length in the Universe?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ต.ค. 2019
  • Visualizing the smallest size in the universe - Planck Length & why you can’t go smaller
    Visualizing Planck length - why is it the smallest in the universe? Graphics courtesy of Michael and Cary Huang: www.htwins.net/
    The scale of the universe is bigger than you can imagine. It is also smaller than you can imagine. The smallest lenth theorized to be possible, the Planck length is about 4 X 10^-35 meters. Just imagine things that are about the size of your body. Things like the giant earthworm that lives along streams in Australia. Or a big beachball, which can be found near oceans and beaches all across America.
    Now, lets go smaller by one order of magnitude, so now we are looking at things that are on the scale of about 10 centimeters. These are things like the shrew, or a chicken egg.
    Now let’s go a thousand times smaller than the scale of a human being, on the order of 1 millimeter or one thousand of a meter. Here, you’ll find things like a grain of sand or dust mites.
    Let’s go 1000 times smaller than this scale. Now we are going a hundred times smaller than the width of a human hair. And ten times smaller than even bacteria. Here, we are going to find things like large viruses.
    Let’s keep going to 1000 times smaller this. This is nanometers, or one billionth of a meter. Now we are exploring a universe that we can’t see with optical telescopes. This is on the scale of the size of molecules like DNA and the glucose molecule, that your body uses as its source of energy. And the scale of the biggest atom - cesium.
    Let’s go 1000 times smaller than this. This is one trillionth of a meter. This is on the order of the wavelength of gamma rays. This is the highest energy electromagnetic radiation, consisting of the most energetic photons.
    Let’s go 1000 times smaller than this. This is 1X 10^-15 or one quadrillionth of a meter. This is the size of particles that make up the nucleus of all atoms, protons and neutrons. The size of a typical atom is however is 100,000 times bigger than its nucleus.
    You would think that we are getting close to the smallest size theorized to exist - the plank length. But we are nowhere close. You have to go a quadrillion times smaller than one quadrillionth of a meter, or 1 X 10^-30 of meter….and you would still need to go another 100,000 times smaller than that, or 1 X 10^-35 meters. Then you would be at the plank length. In fact, if an atom was the size of the earth, a planck length would be smaller than the size of an atom - it would be about the size of a proton.
    But What exactly is a Planck length and why is it the smallest length?
    Planck length is actually derived from the fundamental constants of the universe that define the properties of space-time: The speed of light - c which signifies the maximum speed of communication in the universe. The gravitational constant - G, which signifies the magnitude of gravitational force between two massive objects. And the reduced Planck Constant - h bar, which links how much energy a photon carries depending on its electromagnetic frequency.
    These are really the only constants that define the fundamental properties of the universe and all its contents. By taking different mathematical combinations of these constants, and reducing their units, you can get a length. By similar mathematical manipulation, you can also get planck time and planck energy.
    But what does this length mean? Why is it significant?
    It is the smallest length at which gravity would have an effect. It is the scale and size of the strings in string theory. It is also the scale at which space-time is theorized to become quantized in Loop quantum gravity theory.
    So why is it the smallest length? In 1964, C Alden Mead determined that using the known laws of quantum mechanics and laws of gravitation, it is impossible to determine the position of an object to a precision smaller than the Planck length. So from what is currently known about quantum mechanics, a length smaller than the Planck length has no meaning.
    Note that I said “known” laws. It is possible that at lengths smaller than the Planck scale, gravity or quantum mechanics behaves completely differently, that we may not yet know about. This is quite possible. So until we find out what happens at such small scales, we will need to wait for a future Einstein to reveal this to us.
    One of the remarkable things about Planck length is that since it is derived from the fundamental constants of the universe, which by definition applies to everything, it will be the same no matter what language you might speak, what units you might use, or even what planet you might come from.
    Ao, if we ever come across aliens from another world and compare notes, we both will have the same length for the smallest length possible in the universe.
    #plancklength
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 4.6K

  • @Alorand
    @Alorand 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4185

    Even the science videos are not safe to watch in November.

    • @Hgulix62
      @Hgulix62 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Hhh

    • @xepiconex
      @xepiconex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      NNN is pretty tough this year, but we can get through it if we try hard enough.

    • @Hgulix62
      @Hgulix62 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@xepiconex - It's not that hard

    • @tdamrethebeast2196
      @tdamrethebeast2196 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Lol agree

    • @venomitemusic
      @venomitemusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      2:28 ?

  • @jengleheimerschmitt7941
    @jengleheimerschmitt7941 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2529

    Wait, you're telling me the universe is even bigger than a whale?

    • @prodsiman9051
      @prodsiman9051 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      quote: the great shrimp

    • @Myrslokstok
      @Myrslokstok 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      It realy seams so even tough I cant comprehend it.

    • @Astitva
      @Astitva 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Nah, it isn't it's just science fiction

    • @louism.3435
      @louism.3435 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You wouldn’t even be close to comprehend 1 light year.

    • @Leekodot15
      @Leekodot15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I thought the universe WAS a whale.

  • @PaulMatthis
    @PaulMatthis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1107

    Physicists: Here's some incredible fundamental truths about our universe.
    This guy: Needs more stock footage of a girl in a bikini

    • @dulander
      @dulander 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      Gotta get them extra views in somehow.

    • @badhombre4942
      @badhombre4942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Ain't that the fundamental truth.

    • @-_James_-
      @-_James_- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      There's a rumour going around that she had a beach ball. I didn't see it myself.

    • @anttumurikka8728
      @anttumurikka8728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      can you unified those two?

    • @j1l9i8n0
      @j1l9i8n0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      But what about the girl in bed tho

  • @samrl1170
    @samrl1170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +254

    "Think of the largest thing you can imagine... a blue whale?" bro, we're not retarted.

    • @davek3003
      @davek3003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      You are, you spelled the work wrong.

    • @samrl1170
      @samrl1170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@davek3003 you spilled "word" wong

    • @davek3003
      @davek3003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@samrl1170 lmao

    • @maximofffffff
      @maximofffffff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@davek3003 Maybe we al are

    • @orang1921
      @orang1921 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@samrl1170 you spelled "spelled" an "wrong" wrong

  • @arcanearronax7525
    @arcanearronax7525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6237

    I may be drunk, but I did not expect to see a thong bikini in a video about the planck length.

    • @palmax256
      @palmax256 4 ปีที่แล้ว +336

      @Nissim Levy actually quantum talking is the G-String Thong the shortest lenght possible, theorized in the string theory

    • @theuniversewithin74
      @theuniversewithin74 4 ปีที่แล้ว +97

      Never not expect a thong.

    • @EternalSilverDragon
      @EternalSilverDragon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      You know it was CGI?

    • @lordx4641
      @lordx4641 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@palmax256 who knows whats smallest because our prblem is indeed with what small and big even mathematically priblematic it seems like infinite loop

    • @fss1704
      @fss1704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@EternalSilverDragon Where do i download the program then... asking for a friend

  • @lesleygamerx9463
    @lesleygamerx9463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1426

    The "x" on mobile ads be like:

    • @user-kx5es4kr4x
      @user-kx5es4kr4x 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      They are 2 times smaller than half a plank length

    • @AZSG69
      @AZSG69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LOL

    • @realbignoob1886
      @realbignoob1886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lmfao

    • @mark6302
      @mark6302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nice

    • @Rhakjellg
      @Rhakjellg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-kx5es4kr4x so ⅛ if a Planck length?

  • @harperthejay
    @harperthejay 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    This was actually the first time that I was able to understand *why* the Planck Length is the smallest length at which our understanding of physics can apply. I've known that fact forever, but I've never been able to understand why. Thank you :D

  • @johnstrawb3521
    @johnstrawb3521 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    0:08 - surely one of the finest examples of physics in action ever depicted.

  • @MikeC9903
    @MikeC9903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3900

    Beach Ball Girl. That's all I remember.

    • @Startrooper5555
      @Startrooper5555 4 ปีที่แล้ว +430

      And the girl in bed.

    • @sholmesbrown
      @sholmesbrown 4 ปีที่แล้ว +199

      lol I was thinking when I saw the bed girl 🥰 damn those panties are tight

    • @jeylful
      @jeylful 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      We need a boy to make it even

    • @perfectionbox
      @perfectionbox 4 ปีที่แล้ว +118

      And the swimming girl at the start with the thong bikini bottom. Things that make you go "hmmm..."

    • @sholmesbrown
      @sholmesbrown 4 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      triggered feminist in 3....2....1 🤣

  • @denki2558
    @denki2558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +860

    bacteria: 99% are harmless
    [3:42]
    sanitizer: removes 99% of bacteria

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

      Yep. Hopefully they don't kill just the good bacteria.

    • @deesalmon9632
      @deesalmon9632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Lol isn't it ironic

    • @Burt_Cokaine
      @Burt_Cokaine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Orwell would call that, "double-speak".

    • @drew-shourd
      @drew-shourd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ....fear sells...

    • @Chizzoide
      @Chizzoide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      so, probabilistically, when you use sanitizer, there's a high chance to attack that harmful bacteria than not. Not ironic just common sense. Maybe confusing because you might think of 'not harmful' as we shouldn't kill 'em, but I don' t think that's the correct approach if you're certain that potential bad bacteria is very dangerous.

  • @ashishkiift
    @ashishkiift 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Another excellent video Arvin .. keep up the good work .. really liked how you presented the graphic on the space-time curve woven in Planck length

  • @thetf8142
    @thetf8142 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Funfact: you’re closer to the size of the observable universe, than you are to the Planck length
    Multiple times over

  • @ViciousViscount
    @ViciousViscount 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1485

    Turns out I'm a huge fan of beach balls.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  4 ปีที่แล้ว +111

      Haha, me too.

    • @oatlord
      @oatlord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +176

      More of a bed mites guy myself.

    • @alphagt62
      @alphagt62 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Yes, the beachball scene was most interesting.......

    • @xavierstargher860
      @xavierstargher860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      the scale of her boobies was impressive.

    • @aagallegos94
      @aagallegos94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      3:18 &
      3:21...
      You’ll thank me later...
      Lmfao jk!!

  • @Will_Hallett_Art
    @Will_Hallett_Art 4 ปีที่แล้ว +742

    Yes a blue whale is definatley the biggest thing I could ever imagine

    • @Soupy_loopy
      @Soupy_loopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      I can't even imagine a blue whale. I have no idea what they look like or how big they are supposed to be. How many people have actually seen a blue whale?

    • @user-uz2qz6wu9c
      @user-uz2qz6wu9c 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Soupy_loopy true

    • @steinadler4193
      @steinadler4193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Soupy_loopy
      I have seen a stuffed blue whale in the Natural History Museum in Göteborg (Sweden). Gigantic.
      I have also seen the blue whale skeleton in the Natural History Museum in London. Have a Google picture search!

    • @elck3
      @elck3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It’s about the length of your school’s basketball gym lengthwise. Imagine seeing that

    • @Reignor99
      @Reignor99 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      are you stupid? mount everest is WAY bigger than a blue whale lmao

  • @smallstudiodesign
    @smallstudiodesign 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So beautifully presented and the narrator speaks in a way that offers a touch of intrigue & enthusiasm (without being corny/ cheesy).

  • @roybarron5289
    @roybarron5289 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Sir! I've had definitions before but your clear unmuddied (with unrelated conversation) explanation was the first I truly understood.

  • @jrspringston
    @jrspringston 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1652

    I came for science, I also came for other reasons.

    • @1999yasin
      @1999yasin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      oh god... no!... shut up...

    • @thememescape8167
      @thememescape8167 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      This is a underated comment

    • @ImpeRiaLismus
      @ImpeRiaLismus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      I turned 69 likes into 70.

    • @sylon3431
      @sylon3431 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Марк Пиво he too dangerous to be kept alive !

    • @Numberonesorabjifan
      @Numberonesorabjifan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@ImpeRiaLismus you monster

  • @skylesai
    @skylesai 4 ปีที่แล้ว +469

    Best Info:
    2:30
    3:13

  • @fos8789
    @fos8789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    2:28 yeah, I instantly forgot everything you said before that

  • @jersey-dude
    @jersey-dude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    You always sneak in hot chicks. Love this channel 😂

  • @Sk0p3r
    @Sk0p3r 4 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    The stock footage on this channel is really something at times xD

    • @ioqajeeaspirant8860
      @ioqajeeaspirant8860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      shes seminaked

    • @FlopD0g0
      @FlopD0g0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamesk7063 don't think that's what they're talking about

  • @vincentdamaso6719
    @vincentdamaso6719 4 ปีที่แล้ว +325

    I'm not even 10 seconds in the video and I decided to scroll down the comments already... because of ynow..

    • @Chizzoide
      @Chizzoide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      damn exciting blue whales 🔥

    • @TheNightFlower
      @TheNightFlower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Samesies. 🤔

    • @someoneelse1582
      @someoneelse1582 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      And then you look down again at 2:28, then AGAIN at 3:13. Best. Physics. Video. Evah.

    • @shanetaylor2743
      @shanetaylor2743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Predictable fallout

    • @mh1970
      @mh1970 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because science

  • @matkosmat8890
    @matkosmat8890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for a nice video! The eye candy was unexpected and appreciated :)

  • @mybluemars
    @mybluemars 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    When I was a kid, I used to think that size, length and distance were all just variables in our perception. Thank you for making me think like a kid again!

  • @TheElectra5000
    @TheElectra5000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1568

    Came for the science, stayed for the girls.

    • @fss1704
      @fss1704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah if you find the name please reply

    • @Parpl22
      @Parpl22 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      2:29

    • @Parpl22
      @Parpl22 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m more interested In bikinis

    • @comfixit
      @comfixit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Came for science? I hope that is not what they mean when they say science can be messy.

    • @vwlz8637
      @vwlz8637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      u also came for the girls if u know what i mean 😏😏😏

  • @666sarvan
    @666sarvan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +734

    Think of a biggest thing you can think of
    “Girl’s ass pops up..😂😂

    • @omsingharjit
      @omsingharjit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      as i expected to see such comment then i find your 😂😂

    • @CyanWatercress4
      @CyanWatercress4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not funny didn’t laugh

    • @ultimategamer2669
      @ultimategamer2669 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I LIKE BIG BUTTS AND I CANNOT LIE

    • @nogod7184
      @nogod7184 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly my thoughts when I saw that at 0:07

    • @sohee7597
      @sohee7597 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      "A blue whale? The great pyramids of Giza? Your penis right now?"

  • @artdonovandesign
    @artdonovandesign 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This is the finest video about Plank Length on all of TH-cam.
    Comprehensive. Informative. Understandable. Enjoyable and absolutely Startling! Thank You, Professor Ash!

  • @1989Chrisc
    @1989Chrisc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Presenter : Think of the biggest thing you can think of
    Me : The universe
    Presenter :

    • @magicmulder
      @magicmulder 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He meant “really imagine the size of” which would probably be a large building. We can’t even properly imagine the height of Mt. Everest.

  • @stonewallgregg
    @stonewallgregg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +564

    many pirates had to walk the planck and the length was longer back in those days

    • @es8559
      @es8559 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Baby on Planck. Lol

    • @robertnett9793
      @robertnett9793 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Everythings better with pirates - didn't you know?

    • @keefebaby
      @keefebaby 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Not long enough for them

    • @apple54345
      @apple54345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      and they had to walk the planck uphill both ways.

    • @victorpopescu8073
      @victorpopescu8073 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's a different type of Plank idiot, p.s. It's plank not planck

  • @abyssmanur3965
    @abyssmanur3965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    3:13 The Universe is amazing.

    • @bigulf4872
      @bigulf4872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      agree

    • @infinityj2268
      @infinityj2268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      🍑

    • @TRON0314
      @TRON0314 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@infinityj2268 I think the equation is 🍑+ ⚛ + 🔬 = 👍

    • @infinityj2268
      @infinityj2268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TRON0314 Nah. 🍑+🍆=👍

    • @Bigman-fq6oj
      @Bigman-fq6oj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Bike Speedster nah 🍆 + 🍑 +🛀 = 👍

  • @ramonchiritoiu6131
    @ramonchiritoiu6131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If no coincidence, explain that:
    Divide radius of visible Universe by Plank length and obtained number multiplied with Plank mass will give critical mass of the Universe.
    If you put in a row Plank particles as long as visible radius of the Universe is, they will form a string heavy as whole Universe in which acoustic waves will travel at speed of light. Tension of the string to prevent colaps must be 10^54 Newton or (c^4/G) where "c" is speed of light and "G" is gravitational constant and it is formally centripetal force of a point heavy as the string, traveling at speed of light on visible Universe circumference.

  • @danieljones9245
    @danieljones9245 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Arvin Ash did a REEEEEAL professional job here at presenting his explanation of the extremes of size. If I were to critique anything Arvin said here, it would be his inclusion of loop quantum gravity, because that idea is highly speculative, thus subject to doubt.

  • @teamatfort444
    @teamatfort444 4 ปีที่แล้ว +244

    “Think of the biggest thing you can think of”
    YO MAMA GOT HIM

    • @andrewvida3829
      @andrewvida3829 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Should have stopped at "mama".

    • @user-ov1mn8zg3e
      @user-ov1mn8zg3e 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeh but she thicc tho

    • @xandeath75
      @xandeath75 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrewvida3829 Got em

  • @kagezhang3748
    @kagezhang3748 4 ปีที่แล้ว +486

    Me: * cuts the planck length in half *
    The laws of physics: Bruh

    • @tompurcell1499
      @tompurcell1499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      What with?

    • @rj6110
      @rj6110 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Tom Purcell a really small pair of scissors

    • @tompurcell1499
      @tompurcell1499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@rj6110
      Quantum scissors, eh? Think what fun you have with the Universe by cutting into the very fabric of spacetime. Wow! A suit made out of pure spacetime (dry-cleaning only, of course). I want one!

    • @tompurcell1499
      @tompurcell1499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @Erikas Sadauskas
      I do hope you're just joking, pal!

    • @tompurcell1499
      @tompurcell1499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Erikas Sadauskas
      Have you got a pull-string coming out of your back or do you have anything of use to say?

  • @sproglode
    @sproglode 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What an excellent video. Thanks so much for presenting it. Makes me feel how insignificant humans are in relation to the size of the cosmos, and how arrogant we are to believe we are so smart.

  • @theshonuff8956
    @theshonuff8956 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've just watched a ton of videos on this and yours by far is the easiest to understand. Thanks.

  • @clarkdenunzio573
    @clarkdenunzio573 4 ปีที่แล้ว +277

    i find your analogies of beach balls and dust mites to be elegant, concise, and highly effective at conveying the topic. keep up the good work, sir.

    • @nsnopper
      @nsnopper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      😂😂😂😂

    • @snarfsnarfff
      @snarfsnarfff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      America wooooo!

    • @stevebrindle1724
      @stevebrindle1724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I never noticed the bikini-clad girl 😏

    • @gatekeeper88
      @gatekeeper88 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      what beach ball?

    • @jameskerry41
      @jameskerry41 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and here I thought all Physicist felt girls were all 'yucky'

  • @erictello5189
    @erictello5189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    I love how you put the occasional women in the conceptual analogies. Really keeps my attention span 10 times as much as its usual potential.

  • @chokoon21
    @chokoon21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    When i say science is porn, i didn't mean it literally

  • @sonysantos
    @sonysantos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I knew this channel one week ago thru this video. Awesome! Now I'm seeing all the other videos. On the cover image of your channel I first read "Click on the Bell's Theorem" 😂

  • @plzzz
    @plzzz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +323

    The amount of girl in underwear in this vid, 10 to the power of millionth. I like it.

    • @StanTheObserver-lo8rx
      @StanTheObserver-lo8rx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Oh man,she was gorgeous. Now,find out who she is....

    • @martiddy
      @martiddy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@StanTheObserver-lo8rx which one?, the girl in the bed or the one with a beach ball?

    • @StanTheObserver-lo8rx
      @StanTheObserver-lo8rx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@martiddy All,even the cartoon thing might be racy-ha. If you notice,sleeping girl seems to get more "chilly" the longer she is on camera..if you know what I mean.
      Science is great!

    • @VerisimilitudeDude
      @VerisimilitudeDude 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@martiddy Both

    • @clemfandango5908
      @clemfandango5908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right

  • @theSUICIDEfox
    @theSUICIDEfox 4 ปีที่แล้ว +356

    Actually the smallest thing in the universe is my bank account. 😢

    • @whatshisname3304
      @whatshisname3304 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      i do nt have a bank account i win.

    • @fntime
      @fntime 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Mine is negative, so for me, there is no balance not even
      a 'planck unit' of balance.

    • @whatshisname3304
      @whatshisname3304 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fntime but it exists in theory.

    • @dominic.h.3363
      @dominic.h.3363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      My bank account traffic is so negligible, I have to keep depositing money from time to time so they have a balance to withdraw the account management fee from. My account is not planck length, it's a black hole.

    • @baruchben-david4196
      @baruchben-david4196 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mine is imaginary...

  • @7deepbreaths.sounds
    @7deepbreaths.sounds 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent video....if everyone was aware of these facts, I believe we all would behave differently... knowing how truly awesome the world around us really is.

  • @robertschlesinger1342
    @robertschlesinger1342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.

  • @Spiderhip
    @Spiderhip 4 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    3:20 I was almost seeing it with the naked eye :D

    • @Mark_badas
      @Mark_badas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are there eyes which wear something?

    • @friedegg3732
      @friedegg3732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mark_badas yes

    • @dick220
      @dick220 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But i cannnn

  • @EgnachHelton
    @EgnachHelton 4 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    2:23 Just imagine things that are about the size of the your body: things like the giant earth worm...
    ABOUT THE SIZE OF YOUR BODY
    THE SIZE OF YOUR BODY
    SIZE OF YOUR BODY
    OF YOUR BODY
    YOUR BODY
    BODY
    ....

  • @waynesmodels2064
    @waynesmodels2064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for posting this interesting piece, I enjoyed it. This may have already been noted, but I didn't have time to go over all 3800+ comments. A small typo at time at time 7:05 showing the elegant and beautiful algebraic depiction of Plank’s constant: the denominator should be length cubed over time cubed vice the depicted length squared over time cubed, as this value should be the speed of light, “c”, fully cubed. The math doesn’t work otherwise. Thanks again for posting and please take this correction in the spirit of making something good even better.

  • @bf3ram
    @bf3ram ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine if it could go on forever, that would be scary.

  • @daddy7860
    @daddy7860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +193

    From the content in this video, there's definitely something becoming the biggest thing in the universe

    • @findlayrobertson4985
      @findlayrobertson4985 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Don't flatter yourself, the microverse in antman is still bigger

  • @huhneat1076
    @huhneat1076 4 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    "The universe is even smaller than it is large"
    *_Hmm_*

    • @anarchistalhazen7084
      @anarchistalhazen7084 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      I guess he implicitly meant relative to our order of magnitude

    • @benbooth2783
      @benbooth2783 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah I thought that was BS too.

    • @simplig1272
      @simplig1272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@anarchistalhazen7084 indeed he did meam that, but it barely made sense. nit to mentiom that when he speaks of universe, he speaks of onservable universe. we have no idea how big the scales go beyond what we can detect.

    • @TurdFerguson456
      @TurdFerguson456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Everything should be automatically considered from our perspective unless stated otherwise.
      Examples:
      1. The sun is tiny when compared to the biggest stars in the universe.
      2. My balls are huge.
      3. That thing is massive compared to an ant.

    • @medexamtoolsdotcom
      @medexamtoolsdotcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah he said that really badly. He should have said "the scale of the smallest meaningful structures of the universe is more small, than amount that the scale of the observable universe itself is large."

  • @AmitSharma-sc9gg
    @AmitSharma-sc9gg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very good, you definitely piqued my curiosity.

  • @larrygraham3377
    @larrygraham3377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Arvin for taking us in the opposite direction of the infinitely large. " PLANK TIME " IS AN INTERESTING CONCEPT !!!

  • @squirtreynolds2853
    @squirtreynolds2853 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Can we see the beach ball part again? I feel like that was pretty essential to this whole deal.

    • @edwardtupper6374
      @edwardtupper6374 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Absolutely. This is an important reference to the USA's historical role in nuclear physics, the bikini of course representative of their Pacific Islands testing ground. Science. And history :)

  • @thoaily8352
    @thoaily8352 4 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    For those who need:
    Swimming Girl: 0:06
    Beach Ball Girl: 2:28
    Sleeping Girl: 3:14

    • @princeofallnegros4035
      @princeofallnegros4035 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I just noticed that in every one of his videos there's always a cute girl with a beach ball somewhere in the video...lmao

    • @EternalSilverDragon
      @EternalSilverDragon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Swimming girl is just computer graphics.

    • @TheRogueX
      @TheRogueX 4 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      Sleeping girl is best girl.

    • @pooounderscoreman
      @pooounderscoreman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@TheRogueX yes but would you eat her dead skin cells?

    • @ariela.877
      @ariela.877 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're doing God's work

  • @Timmering
    @Timmering 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video!:)

  • @SurgeonSuhailAnwar
    @SurgeonSuhailAnwar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome video - simple explanation

  • @AwesometownUSA
    @AwesometownUSA 4 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Dude, don’t tell me what I can and can’t imagine. I’m actually, like... super, uh...
    super imagination ... -having.
    Guy.

    • @namr1174
      @namr1174 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @inactiveaccount293
      @inactiveaccount293 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@namr1174 warning crazy virgin found TH-cam app on his ps vita

    • @namr1174
      @namr1174 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@inactiveaccount293 Hhhhhaaaahhhhhaaaaaa

    • @Ludifant
      @Ludifant 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He should have said: remember instead of imagine or "no abstracts", just experience. We have an abstract notion of the universe, the thing that we imagine is actually just illustrations or visualisations, that is not the universe..
      "Ceci n´est pas un pipe."
      You can only manipulate, experience and therefore remember the universe on a near human scale.
      Good point, well made.

    • @K.B.Williams
      @K.B.Williams 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ludifant Interesting. Never thought of it that way. Or can I say I never imagined it that way? Don't think I ever experienced it that way either. So yeah, I never thought of it that way.

  • @esegueyjose7870
    @esegueyjose7870 4 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    him: “think of the biggest thing you can think of”
    me: “IC 1101”
    hin: “maybe a blue whale”
    me: “oh..”

    • @proxy4620
      @proxy4620 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Same, IC 1101 is what I consider the largest thing in the universe that we know of. Technically galactic superclusters are larger but they have no form or arrangement, their existence as a single entity is just a name for a big group of something. While IC 1101, as a galaxy, has form and anatomy and everything in it has something to do with the rest of it. So I agree it's the biggest "thing" discovered in the universe so far.

    • @Srontgorrth
      @Srontgorrth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      What's meant with 'you can think of' is not a thing you got a name for. Humans simply cannot imagine the size of galaxies. But I agree, a whale would pop up in very restricted minds as the biggest thing to imagine 😃

    • @steinadler4193
      @steinadler4193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Double DD?

    • @arenl8926
      @arenl8926 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lol nerd, i thought of yo momma's bootayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

    • @onevastanus
      @onevastanus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Know of and imagine are not the same. That's why he is telling you a blue whale. It is probably the biggest thing you can imagine. Imagine means visualize with some degree of creative accuracy. You know NOTHING about IC 1101 except the name. He means imagine, of course, or any person with a brain would say "universe", not a minor part of it.

  • @harper626
    @harper626 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Arvin, your documentaries are amazing. I enjoy them immensely. Thank you.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My pleasure!

  • @vatrweaver5169
    @vatrweaver5169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When I was 7 years old I ask somebody(don't remember who) how small is atom. He told me so small if you divide it will be nothing. That bothers me for long time. Luckily went to art Academy.

  • @JamaaLS
    @JamaaLS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    0:07 THICC

  • @XEinstein
    @XEinstein 4 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    This video really should be the start of a whole series that explores the holographic principles, loop quantum gravity, information theory and the entropic universe

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Einstein X That’s actually next.

    • @christianheichel
      @christianheichel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ArvinAsh awesome!!
      Will that also include info on Planck time and volume? Would you also detail why these measurements are the smallest theoretical sizes?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Chris Heichel Yes. I talked about it a bit in this video. It is based on mathematical manipulation of the same fundamental constants. So basically the same reason that Planck length is the smallest.

    • @leviathansnemesis3742
      @leviathansnemesis3742 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No, It should start as it did with a bikini shot of a woman's ass underwater. I don't care if its animation.

    • @Ice-Fall
      @Ice-Fall 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@leviathansnemesis3742 With some of the comments, I suspect beach girl and bed girl won't be making an appearance in upcoming vids. :(

  • @jaylloyd7246
    @jaylloyd7246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quality ! So amazing thank you

  • @diekeien1310
    @diekeien1310 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    its hard to imagine how big the universe is;
    think of the largest thing you can imagine: me: universe

  • @KiranR2612
    @KiranR2612 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    TLDR: Planck length is the 'pixel'(or information) density of the universe.

    • @Ludifant
      @Ludifant 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      If we could prove the universe is even quantised, the planck length would be a candidate to express the resolution, yes, but that´s missing almost everything that´s cool about thinking about it and realising how amazing everything is.

    • @moladiver6817
      @moladiver6817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Voxel

    • @trongduong4901
      @trongduong4901 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Everything is theory, science is developing and our imagination is our power.

    • @ItsHollowfied
      @ItsHollowfied 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looking at atoms under an electron microscope looks like pixels on a computer screen when zoomed in on.

    • @christianheichel
      @christianheichel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No single planck length can hold information.

  • @KingoftheJuice18
    @KingoftheJuice18 4 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    Beautiful explanations--seriously. As a non-science person, this was very clear and helpful. You also spiced it up with other beautiful elements. Well done!

  • @grandlotus1
    @grandlotus1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professor Ash: I am a big fan! When I listen to you, I feel less dumb and that feels good.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to hear that.

  • @FinDubGames
    @FinDubGames ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This was INCREDIBLY well made and informative. So glad I clicked on it.

  • @joshuacornelius25
    @joshuacornelius25 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    The Planck length is the smallest degree of entanglement between two points within the quantum field. If the planck unit was zero, the quantum field would collapse into a single point of infinite value (or zero since a single point without a reference has no value). This unit gives rise to the constants we observe in our universe. The anthropic principle is the best explanation for why we live in a universe with the planck length we find. The many worlds interpretation would suggest that the planck length is different in other universes, and that quantum gravity is a shared force as a result of entanglement across all possibilities in the wave function. The planck length in a particular universe determines which portion of that force exists in that universe.... i.e. The strength of gravity.

    • @firstname4304
      @firstname4304 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Joshua Cornelius interesting

    • @kidzbop38isstraightfire92
      @kidzbop38isstraightfire92 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The planck length determines the strength of gravity? I mean, yes indirectly, but there's no reason for the "vacuum energy" of the planck length to be what it is. In other words, the planch length-to-gravity strength ratio could have been any number, not just the one it is. So it's not exactly why gravity has it's particular strength. There really is no reason for gravity to have it's particular strength... It could have been anything.

    • @johnroscoe2406
      @johnroscoe2406 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I like turtles.

    • @pastmasterdan4080
      @pastmasterdan4080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s the illusion of mass?

    • @bltzcstrnx
      @bltzcstrnx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's the smallest resolution that our universe simulation able to compute. Same as C, it's the simulation tick time.

  • @Andy-413
    @Andy-413 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    You underestimate my imagination.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      That's a good thing.

    • @lowiq8176
      @lowiq8176 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't try it

    • @shreyasuman9f359
      @shreyasuman9f359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Imaginations never be underestimated bcoz it give rise to innovation

  • @randomguy9241
    @randomguy9241 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would give 3 likes if I could: 1 for the great explanation, 2 for being humble and 3 for the witty observation that aliens prefer US from all other countries.

  • @BharathRamMS
    @BharathRamMS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this awesome video.

  • @JB-gi5ph
    @JB-gi5ph 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Hmm, you lost me at beach ball. Gonna need a full in-depth vid on that one.

  • @SerunaXI
    @SerunaXI 4 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Finally, a way to measure my length.

    • @trongduong4901
      @trongduong4901 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is the known knowledge, it maybe wrong haha. And you are atoms which change every microsecond. Too hard to measure you exactly. Finally forget it!

    • @DutchBane
      @DutchBane 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      R/suicidebywords nice!

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can imagine infinity and Universe is like a grain of sand in comparison

  • @rgudduu
    @rgudduu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic teaching..thx

  • @gaming4life25
    @gaming4life25 4 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    3:12 yup perfect footage to be put in a science video... Smh

    • @calitreesweet
      @calitreesweet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Btw, here
      depositphotos.com/182727910/stock-video-timelapse-of-female-changing-sleeping.html

    • @immediamalcoccinello483
      @immediamalcoccinello483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      "I'm an adult virgin"

    • @Ooochild
      @Ooochild 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Biology and anatomy _is_ science

  • @lordkresh
    @lordkresh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I stopped thinking about the beach ball almost immediately.

  • @Versuffe
    @Versuffe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Singularity: *laughs in 0d*

  • @jerryh1895
    @jerryh1895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Planck Length is not necessarily the smallest space, it is just where known physics would break down.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep.

    • @gursach4435
      @gursach4435 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh So wouldn't you agree the title's pretty misleading? Sure you explained it a little more near the end of the video but plenty of people won't watch it through, and they'll end up spreading false information just from having seen the title -_-

    • @thejagotishow
      @thejagotishow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gursach4435 It’s the smallest possible length we know at the moment, it’s possible there could be smaller objects/lengths but we just don’t have the technology and knowledge to even know of their existence.

    • @gursach4435
      @gursach4435 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thejagotishow It's not that we can't currently determine the _existence_ of lengths smaller, because saying that implies we _know_ there is a lower limit on length itself but we just don't know how small that is, which also implies that we _know_ spacetime is quantized. From what I've heard, there would need to be a theory of quantum gravity that concurs with current quantum theory in order for us to know that spacetime is quantized, so currently we can't say it is. What we do know now, like Jerry said, is that known physics doesn't stand at scales smaller than a planck length. That's why I was unhappy with the title - it implies we know spacetime is quantized - with the smallest possible length being a planck length- but we don't.

  • @arturhernadi3555
    @arturhernadi3555 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    2:28 bless you for that

    • @OlpyColpy
      @OlpyColpy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gotta get a name surely

  • @debunkthis
    @debunkthis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    The Planck length is the smallest length we could measure with out creating a black hole. That is the smallest scale of uncertainty not necessarily the smallest length

    • @biggerdaddy123
      @biggerdaddy123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes. And as Arvin, said, as far as we know so far.
      Truth be told, there is so much more to learn!!
      Millenia from now, our current understanding will probably seem rudimentary as cavemen seem to us. Our understanding of the cosmos, energy manipulation and space/time travel will be orders of magnitude, if not on different dimensions and beyond our current concept of time and space.
      Everything is relative!
      Secret is to enjoy our present. Our unique present.
      Arvin is doing a swell job, explaining what we know so far!!
      Love the playful "fuzzy" reference. Excellent work Arvin.
      This channel is a rare brain candy. Thank you.

    • @debunkthis
      @debunkthis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      biggerdaddy123 I think he’s doing a good thing but I also think he also misinterprets some of the science. Not often but sometimes, hell im guilty of it as well I’m just clearing it up. If it were the smallest possible length mathematics would be wrong

    • @debunkthis
      @debunkthis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      walentaz it’s a theoretical statement quantizing the schwartschild raidius down it pops out of the math. It also pops out in many other places

    • @ongbonga9025
      @ongbonga9025 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Nissim Levy The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is not an observer related phenomenom. It is a fundamental law of physics, a kind of unbreakable symmetry. It is impossible to know both the precise location and momentum of a particle, even with perfect measurements.

    • @ongbonga9025
      @ongbonga9025 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Nissim Levy Quantum uncertainty is inherent in all wave-like systems. It is not the observer effect, where the act of measurement changes the conditions you are trying to measure.
      Here's a quote from the wikipedia page...
      "Thus, the uncertainty principle actually states a fundamental property of quantum systems and is not a statement about the observational success of current technology."
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

  • @clintonlefort2004
    @clintonlefort2004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I come from a non-scientific background but still am fascinated by measurements as the Planck Length. I've applied my best knowledge to this and have not, until watching your explanation, felt like I have a very good grasp of actually how small a length the Planck Lenght is. For example, recently I measured the dimensions of my room (12'X15'X9') = 45.9 Cubic meters; when 45.9 cubic meters is translated to Planck volume it amounts to 1.087239737546e+106. The calculator used tells me that "The Planck volume is a base unit of volume in the system of Planck units, equal to 4.2217 × 10⁻¹⁰⁵ m³. The Planck volume can be defined using fundamental physical constants and has the dimension of volume L³ where L - dimension of length." All of which you explained in Pt I of this video-thanks. According to your explanation, it seems that even in my own room, in one cubic meter, there are more Planck units than there are grains of sand on the Earth. (I know there are many more magnitudes smaller than this but at this point my non-scientific mind kind of took a vacation. Even if I reduced my room size to (1"X1"X1") equalling 0.0000156 cubic meters, I still arrive at this 3.695193879243e+99 Plank volume. On the other hand, if we consider that theologians tell us that in God there is no motion, since God is what is called Immutable, and Eternal, meaning there is no before or after in his Being. This means that on this level the Government of the Universe (which I call my 1"X1"X1") 0.0000156 cubic meter room has this 3.695193879243e+99 Plank volume which is governed by a BEING which is IMMUTABLE and ETERNAL, is equally fascinating to me (though not as fascinating as for someone who truly understands. Anyway, I'm interested in watching part II. Thank you and you deserve definitely a few THUMBS UP for this explanation.

    • @timoms1748
      @timoms1748 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Crazy

    • @mcjamesyt919
      @mcjamesyt919 ปีที่แล้ว

      I AINT READING ALLAT BUT WE UP 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I assume you were just talking some mumbo-jumbo!?

  • @williamremuso6193
    @williamremuso6193 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for your teaching

  • @danricci7855
    @danricci7855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    @2:29 and @3:13 This is my kind of physics class!

  • @MrJetplanemusic
    @MrJetplanemusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    8 seconds in and I'm like, "Dayum!"

  • @petergreen5337
    @petergreen5337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much publisher for this beautiful lesson and demonstration.Thank

  • @latthoff123
    @latthoff123 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Explanation of the size of cäsium...worth of the whole video. One sentence, short, clear, understandable...almost more worht than the rest. Kudos!

  • @johnschmidt1391
    @johnschmidt1391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    For the perfectly sized women:
    0:08 bikini thong
    2:28 beach ball girl
    3:12 girl in bed

  • @alcyonedevelopments7398
    @alcyonedevelopments7398 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    8:20 Props for saying that there might be new discorveries in the future. That's something i'm missing from many science videos (or documentaries): The acknowledgement that we, despite knowing more than ever before, are still far away from knowing everything.

  • @jinks908
    @jinks908 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And to think Mount Everest was the biggest thing I could imagine before coming here. But not anymore. No sir. I am forever changed now. Mind blown.

  • @dioptre
    @dioptre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I remember back in 9th grade when i asked my teacher about planck length
    and he said " If u have an inclined plane, the length of it is called planck length"
    and i nearly exploded XD

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      seriously?

    • @dioptre
      @dioptre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes not even making 1 thing up

    • @poe12
      @poe12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Stands for reason tho

  • @Pavlo-Shatohin
    @Pavlo-Shatohin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You're fantastic! Your visualizations are brilliant! Your work can't be overestimated.

  • @marcosfilipemachado8783
    @marcosfilipemachado8783 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man, i just found out this channel, and it is gold. Thank you very much!!

  • @vozz4826
    @vozz4826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m glad to see little Rhode Island made the big screen. So proud of my state for being compared to sizes

  • @richardventus1875
    @richardventus1875 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It always helps me visualise the scale of the universe by zooming into and out of a Mandelbrot set. However, the Mandebrot set is infinite and there is no such thing as a minimum length. Science has reached the barrier of 'simultaneity, chaos and complexity' which is the domain of the Creator. The Creator has set up the universe so that it can manipulate the outcome of every event, from the quantum to the cosmological scale, to suit its purpose, which is to evolve everything in the universe including all life and mankind. That is why there is so much conflict in all things at every level - to strengthen the evolution of whatever........ If you relentlessly follow the Guidelines of Problacism you will stay on the 'good' side of the evolution of mankind and our environment.

  • @CadmusCurtis
    @CadmusCurtis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Hey I'm new to your channel and want to say thank you for all the effort and clear explanations! I'm trying to learn so much about this kind of stuff, but when you don't know what any of it means it's easier to have someone like you explain it in semi simple ways that make sense. Great work sir I'm now subbed and excited to see what other videos you will release!

    • @soccerking710
      @soccerking710 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You a real one for the honesty.

  • @YoungXelDong
    @YoungXelDong 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I originally wanted to learn but instead ill watch hentai now

  • @hans-jurgenkallweit2767
    @hans-jurgenkallweit2767 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much. You help me in understanding the univers.❤❤❤

  • @Leowavekid
    @Leowavekid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful!!!!!!!!!! Fascinating!!!!!!