excellent observations! this painting also calls to mind the roman god janus. though he only had 2 heads/faces, he was the god of new beginnings... thanks for sharing this book and your thoughts on the paintings. a very enjoyable series! :)
Yes I'm in agreement with your assessment, as an aside there's a channel, yesterday's papers. Compare the interviews with the pre and post Paul swap . Totally different! Commenting on new record releases.
I also see Crowley in the head on the right. I'd love to know why he goes back to Eire for these gods as they have their roots in Greece, Egypt etc... In the US no other group revels in their own heritage like the Irish. They're unique since they are small in number and many could not read or write when they arrived but they dominated the field of writing from journalism to novels throughout the 20th century. Politics as well. But the same isn't true for the Scots so I'm baffled by his intense interest. The two are very different. Beyond this observation I'm stumped. So maybe it is the ties to alchemy as you pointed out.
I noticed that the picture (far right) that you claim looks like Crowley (and does) Has the fake eye element going on there.. and as an artist/ that is no accident And what we now know from Mike Wills Sage Of Quay Turns out - that he (Billy himself) has a false left eye
ok you have again the red and blue transition within the 3 heads, Crowley to Celtic tribal stone that very much resembles Lam, and Hermes twin in rock musician, so Crowley using mask of Lam to dictate book of law and play osiris and horus just like billy all above bedrock of musicality and becoming the roots of the tree growing from the triangular shape the 3 heads are within.
As an artist myself, I can honestly say that even if I *did not know* that these were Billy's works, I do not care for them. Mind you, knowing he made them makes me like them even less, but to be frank, I just find them plain ugly, unwelcoming and unappealing.
"Why this musical fill was 23 bars long? Most musical phasing divides into regular 2, 3 or 4 bar lengths, so the sum total of bars in a section should not be 23 (because 23 is not a multiple of 2,3 or 4)." Oh dear! (2+3+4) + (2+3+4) + (2+3) = 23. Addition and multiplication are NOT the same thing. Adding multiples of certain numbers need not give a result that is a multiple of any of them. You say, in general, interesting things. But mixing in this kind of tripe throws your credibility to the dogs!
Oh dear! You don't understand the term "regular musical phrasing". If the phrases are 2-bars in length, that means the total section length in bars will be a multiple of 2 (2, 4, 6, 8 etc). If the phrases are 3-bars in length, then the total section length in bars will be a multiple of 3 (3, 6, 9, 12 etc). Something like avant-garde classical music or jazz music might have irregular phrasing, like the type you suggest, but not the average pop song from the 60s. More to the point, the choice to have a musical fill that is 23 bars in length is arbitrary, unless there is a hidden reason for it, like those I suggested.
@@supernaturalbeatles Errrr ... no! The opening of Chopin’s Ballade Op 23 No1 begins with a three-bar phrase followed by a two-bar phrase. You could also argue that this is one complete five-bar phrase, but that´s where subjectivity seeps in.
I'm not talking about phrase lengths in specific pieces of music, I'm talking about the use of regular phrases of music in general. And yet again, you've missed the bigger point. They chose the number 23. It comes up quite a bit in this conspiracy (for example, on the front cover of Yellow Submarine) and I'd like to know why.
I love these. An artists eye is important here. These people have mastery in many fields.
Trees symbolise family roots, he may be indicating a family connection between the three
Interesting, thank you making the links I would miss.
excellent observations! this painting also calls to mind the roman god janus. though he only had 2 heads/faces, he was the god of new beginnings... thanks for sharing this book and your thoughts on the paintings. a very enjoyable series! :)
Thanks Jen. My brother said the same thing about Janus!
Yes I'm in agreement with your assessment, as an aside there's a channel, yesterday's papers. Compare the interviews with the pre and post Paul swap . Totally different! Commenting on new record releases.
I'm guessing Billy also painted the cover of the Twin Freaks album because the artwork definitely looks similar.
Yes he did. I'll talk about that painting in my next video, along with a few other paintings.
I also see Crowley in the head on the right. I'd love to know why he goes back to Eire for these gods as they have their roots in Greece, Egypt etc... In the US no other group revels in their own heritage like the Irish. They're unique since they are small in number and many could not read or write when they arrived but they dominated the field of writing from journalism to novels throughout the 20th century. Politics as well. But the same isn't true for the Scots so I'm baffled by his intense interest. The two are very different. Beyond this observation I'm stumped. So maybe it is the ties to alchemy as you pointed out.
I noticed that the picture (far right) that you claim looks like Crowley (and does)
Has the fake eye element going on there.. and as an artist/ that is no accident
And what we now know from Mike Wills Sage Of Quay
Turns out - that he (Billy himself) has a false left eye
I think it has been established that Billy has a false right eye.
ok you have again the red and blue transition within the 3 heads, Crowley to Celtic tribal stone that very much resembles Lam, and Hermes twin in rock musician, so Crowley using mask of Lam to dictate book of law and play osiris and horus just like billy all above bedrock of musicality and becoming the roots of the tree growing from the triangular shape the 3 heads are within.
the other tree is pauls burial on the hill growing 3 beatles tree
As an artist myself, I can honestly say that even if I *did not know* that these were Billy's works, I do not care for them.
Mind you, knowing he made them makes me like them even less, but to be frank, I just find them plain ugly, unwelcoming and unappealing.
"Why this musical fill was 23 bars long? Most musical phasing divides into regular 2, 3 or 4 bar lengths, so the sum total of bars in a section should not be 23 (because 23 is not a multiple of 2,3 or 4)." Oh dear! (2+3+4) + (2+3+4) + (2+3) = 23. Addition and multiplication are NOT the same thing. Adding multiples of certain numbers need not give a result that is a multiple of any of them. You say, in general, interesting things. But mixing in this kind of tripe throws your credibility to the dogs!
Oh dear! You don't understand the term "regular musical phrasing". If the phrases are 2-bars in length, that means the total section length in bars will be a multiple of 2 (2, 4, 6, 8 etc). If the phrases are 3-bars in length, then the total section length in bars will be a multiple of 3 (3, 6, 9, 12 etc). Something like avant-garde classical music or jazz music might have irregular phrasing, like the type you suggest, but not the average pop song from the 60s. More to the point, the choice to have a musical fill that is 23 bars in length is arbitrary, unless there is a hidden reason for it, like those I suggested.
@@supernaturalbeatles Errrr ... no! The opening of Chopin’s Ballade Op 23 No1 begins with a three-bar phrase followed by a two-bar phrase. You could also argue that this is one complete five-bar phrase, but that´s where subjectivity seeps in.
I'm not talking about phrase lengths in specific pieces of music, I'm talking about the use of regular phrases of music in general. And yet again, you've missed the bigger point. They chose the number 23. It comes up quite a bit in this conspiracy (for example, on the front cover of Yellow Submarine) and I'd like to know why.