Neumann TLM103 vs Neumann U87 Ai Comparison (Versus Series)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
  • Today I compare two of the most popular voice over microphones on the market, the Neumann TLM103 and the Neumann U87 Ai. I let you hear how they sound for spoken word and a couple of instruments to help determine which of the mics will be right for you and which of these mics you should buy (if you're trying to decide between them obviously).
    HQ Audio Of Video: podcastage.com/rev/TLM103vsU87ai
    Buy the Neumann TLM103 (Affiliate Link)
    Amazon: geni.us/ntlm103
    Sweetwater: imp.i114863.net/ntlm103
    Buy the Neumann U87 Ai (Affiliate Link)
    Amazon: geni.us/u87aikit
    Sweetwater: imp.i114863.net/u87
    Buy the Universal Audio X8 (Affiliate Link)
    Amazon: geni.us/uax8
    Sweetwater: imp.i114863.net/uax8
    00:00 - Intro to Versus Series
    00:27 - Build Quality
    01:25 - Blind Comparison
    02:34 - Microphone Spoken Word Test (Price / Specs)
    03:31 - Polar Pattern Tests
    04:15 - Background Noise Tests
    04:57 - Distance Tests
    05:35 - Music Tests
    07:48 - Conclusion & Winner
    11:09 - Outro
    #Neumann #VoiceOver #Comparison
    Become a Patreon: / podcastage
    Become a Member: / @podcastage
    Subscribe For More Videos: th-cam.com/users/podcastage?su...
    My TH-cam Setup: podcastage.com/studio
    My Favorite XLR Mics: podcastage.com/rev/favxlr
    My Favorite USB Mics: podcastage.com/rev/favusb
    Check the Frequently Asked Questions: podcastage.com/faq
    Vote For What You Want Reviewed: podcastage.com/vote
    NOTE (FULL DISCLOSURE): If you purchase an item using an affiliate link, it provides me a small referral fee. As an associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. For more info check my FAQ page links below.
    Check Out This Stuff TOO:
    Website: www.podcastage.com
    Giveaways: podcastage.com/giveaways
    Discord: www.podcastage.com/discord
    Merch: podcastage.com/store
    Company Relationship Disclosure: podcastage.com/disclosure
    Personal: www.bandrewscott.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 281

  • @JohnGlasscock
    @JohnGlasscock 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Well it's a Neumann, can't go wrong with either one! Great comparison

    • @Nordium
      @Nordium 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      i like your last name

  • @jibrocks8996
    @jibrocks8996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I saw this thumbnails and out loud said “BROOOOOOOO”
    Dude such a good video, I have always wanted this comparison.

  • @danielgloor8401
    @danielgloor8401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you Bandrew for this review… I ever appreciate your comments. 👍🏻

  • @MrManumendes
    @MrManumendes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    For me the main difference is in the sibilants. The U87 is much smoother there. Doesn't mean that the 103 is harsh, but the overall SSSSSSes are much more pleasant for me, listening to the U87

    • @who_is_dis
      @who_is_dis ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Low mids as well - they just sound rounder where the 103 sounds a bit flat in comparison.

    • @HanyAhmed-vk7rq
      @HanyAhmed-vk7rq ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please...if I only want a microphone for singing, why would I choose between them?

    • @ProdigyBowlersTour
      @ProdigyBowlersTour ปีที่แล้ว

      This was exactly my experience of the two mics. We had a U87ai in the production studio of a radio station I once worked in years ago. I loved how I sounded on it. But when I bought a TLM103, I was less than impressed. The S sounds were too sizzly for me. I prefer those S sounds to be smooth and transparent. They were anything but with the TLM 103.

    • @tallmccartneymusic
      @tallmccartneymusic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i disagree, during the blind test i heard mic B to sound a little more abrasive with a thicker push in the mids, more punch you could say.
      i found mic A to be quite a bit smoother and less "stop-and-go."

    • @slyyyboyyy
      @slyyyboyyy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah. I think that's why the U87 works so well on acoustic guitar whereas the TLM103 never works in that context (unless paired with a smoother mic)

  • @jordanwoerndle2986
    @jordanwoerndle2986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    was excited enough about this one to bust out the good headphones. these are fun, i hope you keep doing them

  • @travsmac
    @travsmac 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I totally guessed right! Thanks for this Versus, Bandrew!

  • @Tarkov.
    @Tarkov. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I liked the sound of the U87 AI better in the blind test.
    It's definitely cool to have access to them to do these tests, but they're both neat and I don't think anyone would feel bad about purchasing one versus the other.

  • @omaraleesa
    @omaraleesa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I own a U87 and it is one of the best microphones that suits all audio materials, whether the voice is women or men, and it has great flexibility in polishing and smoothing the sound.
    Thank you brother for this nice comparison

  • @RangerRickTV
    @RangerRickTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My latest TH-cam video was all done on the TLM103. Check it out and tell me what u think of the sound .

  • @charlyavefenix3100
    @charlyavefenix3100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Oh man! I sweared Mic A was U87 in the blind test, it sounded better to me. Then you revealed them and U87 sounded better to me. My conclusion is: we are biased towards expensive microphones even though the slight differences don't justify to pay the triple, but if I could, I would buy U87.

    • @andycrystal
      @andycrystal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The most accurate comment.

    • @user-nf8oe4cv4w
      @user-nf8oe4cv4w ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kudos for the truest comment on TH-cam. Our brains are powerful and high end gear desire will always lead our decision making. Uuuuunless we do the valued blind test and not give a 💩 what anyone else thinks.
      And after saying all that…I still want a U87 too 🤣

    • @rikhrossh5593
      @rikhrossh5593 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Go get your ears checked 🤨

    • @swapnilkulkarni9209
      @swapnilkulkarni9209 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      U 87 sounds a little fatter on voice which may not be the most desired thing always. Tlm 103 sounded a little thinner to me and I liked it finally personally. I think it because of the transformer less design. The transformer on the u87 gives fatness to the tone.

    • @oliviercyber
      @oliviercyber 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Put a real artist in front of the 2 microphones, and you will understand the difference in price. U87 is doing ART, others are just doing sound. It is applying for other high end microphones too.

  • @Hugmir
    @Hugmir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Big thanks for this comparison. I have only recently realized how bright the 103 actually is.
    U87 was much preferred during the talking segments - but, funny enough, 103 did sound more... normal on the electric guitar, more like the sound you'd expect.

  • @keithgendler8727
    @keithgendler8727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I was unable to tell which was which in the blind test, but it turns out that I liked the U87 Ai better. That made me smile when you revealed which was which, but I know it was only a coin toss. I'm a fan of your Versus Series, but that's only because you do such a great job with it. Thanks, BLT.

    • @BRADRANCH
      @BRADRANCH ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I listened several times. Cant tell a difference, for sure not an obvious difference.I've been recording for years and I;m thinking maybe I just cant hear well. All I could do was guess which was the 87.

    • @BRADRANCH
      @BRADRANCH ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Against other name brands I can pick the 87 out almost always. To me that 103 is excellent and I just have no reason to justify spending the 87 $$$$$

  • @punknugget561
    @punknugget561 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This ia GREAT review, as I was looking into these two very mics. Thank you!

  • @theoliviaarchives4794
    @theoliviaarchives4794 ปีที่แล้ว

    We can always count on you for concentrated information. Thanks.

  • @DanLikely
    @DanLikely 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    proud to say i guessed it correct, but it definitely took some close listening. thanks for the thorough content, keep it up!

  • @andrewcamagay6255
    @andrewcamagay6255 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The U87 Ai is just so much smoother in the high frequencies on the guitars! It sounded warmer on the vocals, but there really isn't much difference between the two, just a matter of preference at this point :)

  • @artbincredible
    @artbincredible 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You do a great job with these series.

  • @mixmastermonte
    @mixmastermonte หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for taking the time for all the examples!! The U87 sounded great. Sooo expensive though.

  • @SuperMiker78
    @SuperMiker78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing as always my friend! I sincerely couldn’t tell a difference on the blind test so, as you said, we who own any of these mics is the winners.
    Your musical skill and artistry is well appreciated, thank you
    Love you man, keep up the good work!

  • @QuantumGamingUploads
    @QuantumGamingUploads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank You for the amazing comparison Bandrew. Love both but I like the TLM Neumann Series better. Love the smooth approach and articulation of the U87Ai on the accoustic guitar though. ' Me talking about articulation lol. Learned so much from Bandrew.

  • @mogwix
    @mogwix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was actually kinda surprised how different these two mics sound. I wasn't expecting the 103 to sound so bright in comparison. Also kind of surprised it took you so long to make this video. Lol

  • @MarOminMusic
    @MarOminMusic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    love the song! well done man, great comparison!!

  • @pbasswil
    @pbasswil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'd be perfectly happy with the 103, but would use it in full expectation that - for many sources & purposes - a couple of db of lowpass cut around 5khz would be helpful, to tame that sizzle a bit.

  • @djp_video
    @djp_video 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My TLM-103 is champagne colored and my U87 is black. Backwards of yours!
    I did guess them correctly. The 103 is brighter but not quite as smooth on the top end and it's easy to pick out between the two.

  •  2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Great comparison, Bandrew. I'd like to know your pick between the TLM 103 and the TLM 102 for voiceover purposes. I already have a TLM 102 and I'm pretty happy with it, but I have my doubts on whether I should upgrade it or not. Thank you!

    • @ElijahG98
      @ElijahG98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He has an older vid thats a vs series of the 102 and 103

    • @enriquekahn9405
      @enriquekahn9405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you didn't as me but I'll give my opinion: the 103 is amazing on deep voices but can sound harsh on higher pitched men and most women
      whether trading up is worth it will depend on the talent's voice

    • @langgaspeaks
      @langgaspeaks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As a user of the TLM 103, it's the very low self-noise vs 102 that got me going for it.

  • @sikibuseiju1
    @sikibuseiju1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the great review. one question, why do you use post boost to adjust the volume instead of just gain? Is the sound quality better that way?

  • @ALLELITEMUSICOFFICIAL
    @ALLELITEMUSICOFFICIAL ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We own a TLM103 and a U87 in our studio for many years. Many people forgot about the Art of recording and the Art of Microphone Knowledge. Biggest mistake we always see is that people compare DIFFERENT Microphones in the exact SAME position. EVERY Microphone got a DIFFERENT sweet spot, it might not be a big difference, but before you test two or more microphones against eachother, you have to find out in which position and with which preamp (not every chain works with every mic the same way!) each microphone sounds THE BEST. Only that way you can get a fair comparison. The K103 is actually the front side of the K87 and the capsule is responsible for 70-90% of the sound. Since the capsules are close to be similar the sound shouldn't be too far away. And surprise, it isn't. If you bring the TLM103 in its sweet spot its NEVER harsh or anything like this. People hating on the TLM103 and loving the sound of the U87 know nothing about the true Art of Recording. Also its very important to mention that the output transformer of the U87Ai is extremely transparent and neutral. So no matter with which microphone your going, you will get GREAT results as long as you got a great Talent infront of the microphone and a engineer who knows what he's doing.

    • @BRADRANCH
      @BRADRANCH ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you ALL ELITE MUSIC. Thats the best comment Ive seen. And makes the most sense. I have a 103 and feel like I dont need an 87 mic. But Ive spent time with the 103 and know its habits well. When I sing on an 87 I feel I need to Eq it, with the 103 it feels ready before EQ. Thats just on my VX though, Another might not be the same. I dont own an 87 but have had them in my studio and sang on them in Nashville studios and I really love the 103 and dont feel Im coming up short at all. Both are great.

    • @luisabregu59
      @luisabregu59 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hermoso todo lo que aquí se comenta todo es super genial .Quisiera preguntar cual seria ese punto óptimo para el tlm103 que se menciona , saludos un gran abrazo a todos .

  • @techmed-rainer
    @techmed-rainer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Bandrew, I really like your "versus series"! But you know this already. I appreciate, that you made clear that both of these microphones are great. But there is one point, where I have a different opinion. For acoustic guitar I like the U87 much more than the 103. The sound of the acoustic guitar opened up, was very clear and natural to my ears. I'd always prefer the U87 for this purpose.

    • @jpipes
      @jpipes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This comment says it all.
      For me, you just hear more of the sound with the u87ai.
      But also having a 103 would be an amazing stepping stone at 1/3 the cost.

  • @synthgo
    @synthgo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much for your Vidz Brandrew! Before I buy any mic, I watch your reviews first. Could you please, please do a review or comparison for the new UT Twin87 vs U87ai. Thanks!

  • @billymack4258
    @billymack4258 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome test review! Question when you did the singing vocal test what was your vocal chan and recording sample rate 48khz etc... and are you using the Apollo converters? I notice when your were singing that both mic's sounded a lot smoother opposed to before when you were talking they both seem a little gritty sounding. Thanks very much for your time and knowledge. 🙂

  • @pianofortestudios2406
    @pianofortestudios2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome as always, Bandrew. Would love for you to compare the Sennheiser MKH 416 vs the TLM103.

  • @WillCarterTech
    @WillCarterTech 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ooooo im so ready for this VERSES

  • @travissuttie
    @travissuttie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was really obvious to me in ther blind test. The top end on the 87 is just so smooth. BUTTER!

  • @greggwoods3779
    @greggwoods3779 ปีที่แล้ว

    I definitely determined which mic was which, the 103 is quite bright, U87 is very smooth. Great video, thank you!

  • @Glen.Danielsen
    @Glen.Danielsen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love these helpful videos, also because I like intro: “Greetings Earthlings.” 💛

  • @lcmusic6489
    @lcmusic6489 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi - looking for a condenser mic. Vocals are strong at the higher end but can sometimes be a little harsh, but need more sensitivity at the bottom end where vox are weaker - any suggestions from the many that you have tried/reviewed. Was going to buy Aston Spirit but clarity at top end has put me off. Thx

  • @benjameek
    @benjameek 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would so love a comparison on the neumann tlm 107 and the earthworks ethos. also do you think one or the other is better for room tone rejection? outside sound etc. which do you think has a better tone overall for vocals?

  • @johnnyphoney5669
    @johnnyphoney5669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I passed the blind test successfully, I already knew that U87 Ai is “warmer” from other comparison videos, it has some bump in the mids comparing to TLM 103. I’m not sure if I can tell which one I would prefer over another judging only the sound. I think it depends on the purpose. TLM 103 definitely wins the guitars test. I even disliked the sound of U87 Ai for guitars, not only liked TLM 103 more. TLM 103 has less “body” and more “crystallness”/“clearness” of the highs. I think I would prefer TLM 103 for spoken word (at least for your voice) and for singing U87 Ai. But for the spoken word I think I would prefer TLM 102 over TLM 103. And TLM 103 for singing over TLM 102. They all are pretty good and it’s not easy to tell which one you would like less or more.

    • @johnnyphoney5669
      @johnnyphoney5669 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @GRiiMy I have no idea. Rap is not my thing, I don’t listen to it.

  • @chrisk.6246
    @chrisk.6246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Both sound great, and I agree that the U87 wins, but it’s maybe harder to justify the price difference. I will say I felt like the U87 sounded better on your electric guitar test (I guess I’m a sucker for the more mid-forward sound you mentioned!), and I think adjusting the U87’s position slightly for the acoustic test could have made that the clear winner. As always, thanks for making it easier for the rest of us to make informed purchases!

  • @DapperDanLovesYou
    @DapperDanLovesYou 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video as always Bandrew!
    Quick Note: the link in the description for the "HQ Audio Of Video" is currently innacurate. The current web address has no capital letters:
    "tlm103vsu87ai" vs
    "TLM103vsU87ai" (current address link)
    Cont:
    I did not guess the mirophones correctly :,<
    I would have expected the U87 to have more mid presence, but I was completely backwards. The TLM 103 is so strong on baritone and bass voices, I wouldn't have guessed it had such forward mids! I preferred the U87's smoother approach to the mids; it feels very clean and clear and smooth! However, the 103 doesn't seem harsh. Both microphones have that Neumann "sheen" on the high frequencies that maintains clarity without being sibilant or harsh.

  • @waxmiracles
    @waxmiracles 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I guessed these right immediately. I'd love to hear a comparison review of the Serrano Vintage 87.

  • @ellobobeats6324
    @ellobobeats6324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    They sound so similar!🤯

  • @hellopsp180
    @hellopsp180 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @podcastage do you have any plans to look at u67 vs TLM102.
    those two are my top picks for neumans.

  • @designercheck8738
    @designercheck8738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you make a video about in-ear monitors for stage performance???

  • @Beshinemusician
    @Beshinemusician 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great Review Bandrew, as always. Both Extremely clean Mics. Every time I hear the U87, I see Lennon. The U87 is a little warmer, and can feel the depth more than the TLM 103. I agree as I thought the TLM 103 sounded better on the electric guitar, however the acoustic sounded better with the U87, to my ears. Vocals over the Electric guitar tracks go to the U87 as well.

  • @ivomartijn7400
    @ivomartijn7400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for all these great comparisons! It would be great if you'd do a comparison of the Neumanns with the K89 capsule: the U89 (intended as an improvement of the U87), the TLM 193 and, my favorite, the TLM 170.

  • @saintdumont5322
    @saintdumont5322 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Review! Still heart to choose... i got the TLM 102, now thinking of U87 or TLM 103... ahhh....

  • @johnshane3457
    @johnshane3457 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have been looking into getting another micophone. The U87 is of cause is a jump when it comes to price. I know i have a higher midrange on my vocals. I do like how the u87 brightened your vocals up but for me it would sound tinny if that makes sense. is there a diffrenace between the TLM102, and U87 or the TLM102 vs the TLM 103 let me know or if you can do a video the would be great

  • @Mandovzkis
    @Mandovzkis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you do a comparison between Marantz mpm-1000 vs Audio Technica at2020, please?

  • @Rod-Wheeler
    @Rod-Wheeler 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Review! They sounded very similar to me. I'm listening on Sennheiser HD280 pro headphones.

  • @claudioagmfilho
    @claudioagmfilho 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, U87 has less base! More clear, pure sounding! Awesome video, very informative!

  • @emilionavarrete9530
    @emilionavarrete9530 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, do you have a review of shure ksm8 (dualdyne) on some one of yours channels?

  •  ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats preamp and audio interface? Nice sound

  • @markvandenberg4606
    @markvandenberg4606 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparison! Both sound great, but the U87 takes the cake.

  • @artysanmobile
    @artysanmobile ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The very slight forwardness in the low mids of the 87 is what makes it the perfect vocal mic for me. It is a signature of all the old Neumann mics and decidedly missing in the TLMs, which are probably more flat. It may even be a contribution of the transformer. It is a very broad boost of perhaps 1-2dB with a Q lower than many console EQs can even manage. I would not be unhappy to see a 102 or 103 when visiting in a studio if I was not traveling my 87s. They share much of the magic smoothness in the heart of the vocal range as well as the legendary overhead.

  • @alexanderjd900
    @alexanderjd900 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Podcastage Testing BCM104? Maybe best described as a Speech optimized version of the Tlm103.

  • @thebreakfastmenu
    @thebreakfastmenu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love em both. The U87 is my favorite though.

  • @thedome765
    @thedome765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would love a review of the TLM 107 :3

  • @voa23
    @voa23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In a vocal booth 4x4x7 with treatment between walls and inside booth the 103 is very brittle vs a U87 where talking at a normal level one can be at 2 inches and no sizzle or proximity effect. Both with a 75hz hp filter at the apollo twin duo using an M1 John Hardy Preamp. Would like to hear a comparison between the u87 and TG Chandler on Cardioid for VO. Can send you the TG if you wish. Super video and guitar skills.

  • @Alexandra-Rex
    @Alexandra-Rex 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I couldn't find the U87 on a price comparison site in Norway, but I did get the shock mount listed. For over 300 dollars.. 🤕

  • @tommasomaiello
    @tommasomaiello 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent review, thanks a loro🤘🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @ChrisIsaac1
    @ChrisIsaac1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you demo the United Twin87? Please? Thank you.

  • @BrendaEM
    @BrendaEM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yippie!! I guessed right. Oddly, I felt I heard the smallest amount of distortion in the U87 in voice.
    The U87 sound quite different than the TLM103 both guitars, perhaps less in voice.
    I liked the TLM103 better on voice, but the U87 on the guitar, though I don't know what the guitar is supposed to sound like.
    Won't make my voice sound better : (

  • @A-Mana
    @A-Mana 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Huuuuge difference when it comes to proximity effect performance, I guess PE is where ultra expensive mics shine. the U87 did an amazing job maintaining clarity!

  • @WillCarterTech
    @WillCarterTech 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I noticed that you test the off-axis coloration horizontally. but you dont test how the u87ai would sound if you spoke into the top of mic as if it were an end address mic. Some people like to speak into the top of the u87ai.

  • @kennethbailey7105
    @kennethbailey7105 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Patiently waiting for the Telefunken TF47 review😳

  • @Crowbar11115
    @Crowbar11115 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heads up to anyone near Nashville...I went to their Guitar Center the other day and they actually had a TLM 103 set up for testing!

  • @jmbgermany
    @jmbgermany ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’d prefer the 103 for electric guitar, and the 87 on the acoustic guitar. For sung voice, I’d prefer the 103, for narration maybe the 87. but, as you pointed out, it a matter of taste. Both are great microphones!

  • @strol5751
    @strol5751 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would love to see a review of the Shure SM81!

  • @lifepath7741
    @lifepath7741 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the Neumann TLM 101 (aka Sennheiser Mk4) ?
    Who prefer more Sennheiser Mk4?

  • @MayotheMaker
    @MayotheMaker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bandrew awesome vid! Tlm 103 vs c414!

  • @DMKahn
    @DMKahn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Very interesting to see the tonal differences. It's not that small of a difference. What I hear is as follows: 1. The TLM103 has more bass boost but also more harmonic color down there. You can really hear it on the off axis test when listening to the rear of the mic. It picks up a LOT of low end from the rear of the mic. 2. The treble is more boosted on the TLM103, you can hear it almost like a lazer beam on Bandrew's voice. It doesn't sound bad, it's just more apparent. 3. The u87ai's off axis colouration sounds rfar superior. 4. The dynamic character of the u87ai makes it worth the price alone. It's incredibly smooth and easy to listen to. It's like listening to something sitting by a fireplace drinking hot cocoa lol

  • @BoothJunkie
    @BoothJunkie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    103 is 16 more than 87, QED. ;-) Great comparison.

  • @BigGuy666_
    @BigGuy666_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know What mic Valuetainment podcast use?

  • @Immortix546
    @Immortix546 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what was the volume on the microphone itself and the volume in Windows?

  • @duelmaster66
    @duelmaster66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    now we need a U89i test 🤟

  • @fluphybunny930
    @fluphybunny930 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome versus !
    Two mics I can't afford :D :p

  • @techmed-rainer
    @techmed-rainer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Danke!

  • @andycrystal
    @andycrystal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you ever reviewed the TLM193?

  • @Babu-no7ns
    @Babu-no7ns ปีที่แล้ว

    hmmmm, between a TLM 103, WA-67, or AKG c414 what would you choose from your experience?

  • @GizmoTHC
    @GizmoTHC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is it bad that 103 has 50ohms impedance? i mean u87 has 200ohms but i thought that the less the ohms the better the microphone? am i wrong?

  • @LoffysDomain
    @LoffysDomain 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I guessed right, but they both sound perfect.

  • @stevetimko1461
    @stevetimko1461 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's a good mic for those of us with bad voices?

  • @The-Skyking
    @The-Skyking 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparison. I think the 102 is closer to the 81ai. The 103 I feel has to much low end roll off and too much high end crispy. I like the 81 over the 103, personally and would be interested in hearing the 102 compared to it. I'm so tempted to send you my Golden Age U47 extended to see what you think.

  • @cdempsey
    @cdempsey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm curious where the Warm Audio WA-87 R2 stands in the Neumann U87 Ai/TLM103, and Rode NT-1 style mic. Is it a decent budget U87? Does it crush the NT-1 given their pricing? Love your videos, they have taught me so much.

    • @artcamp7
      @artcamp7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      he gave it a really good review. I have one I use for voice and guitar and I love it

    • @cdempsey
      @cdempsey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@artcamp7 I'll have to go digging through all his videos now. I'm going to need to get a lot more thumbs ups out of the bag.

  • @AndyKingCo
    @AndyKingCo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I could tell right away that B was the U87 sound full and smooth

  • @Armin.T9
    @Armin.T9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do a rereview of TLM102

  • @Taijifufu
    @Taijifufu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both of these are choice mics. I'd just like to say thank you for teaching me about sibilance. I used to call it "whispyness" or the SSSsssSSsss but now I know there is an actual _real_ word already to describe it and it has helped me hone my craft.

  • @Angelo-vb6dg
    @Angelo-vb6dg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do a Shure KSM32 vs Shure KSM44 comparison

  • @leonardoarcas9676
    @leonardoarcas9676 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    After many videos, I finally chose mine (Samson Q2U (black)). I'm just waiting for the sales of this version here in Brazil! =D

  • @yanossnicklefritz7064
    @yanossnicklefritz7064 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I judged them right, but they are very close. The TLM 103 is a little crisper to me. I bought a TLM 102 a bit back for my personal studio and think I should have just bought the 103, but the 102 is a great mic too. I don't see ever buying a U87. It just doesn't seem worth the cost to me. There are others mics for far less that seem great for my vocals.

  • @EasyFLtutorials
    @EasyFLtutorials ปีที่แล้ว

    What do the buttons do on the u87

  • @jibrocks8996
    @jibrocks8996 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Akg 414 xls vs xlii in the future maybe?

  • @bootlebeats6331
    @bootlebeats6331 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yep. You nailed it.

  • @DWHarper62
    @DWHarper62 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Useful content!...

  • @amalgami
    @amalgami 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    guessed it right.. liked u87. Guessed it with harsh high end of 103..

  • @VIDSInsight
    @VIDSInsight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude, you really have the skills and the voice to sing amazingly well - that voice of yours is well tuned to the guitar.... I'm serious. Have you ever considered going into music as well?

  • @HanyAhmed-vk7rq
    @HanyAhmed-vk7rq ปีที่แล้ว

    Please...if I only want a microphone for singing, why would I choose between them?

  • @bradalford9829
    @bradalford9829 ปีที่แล้ว

    ''QUESTION'' could EQ make these mics sound the same? Its a toss up for me to begin with. I own the 103 and if It would give me a better result I will upgrade but the 87 is just very slightly different to me. When I use the 103 the top seems smooth enough, its not what Id call a problem. Anyone own both? done this ? Wish I had an 87 to compare side by side but I dont. After mix and master I dont think youd hear any difference at all. But cant hear that for myself. :)

  • @matthewwolf1793
    @matthewwolf1793 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for doing this one. Good to hear them together. In my humble opinion, the heavier LF of the 103 works much better for you on voice. The boosted mids of the 87 is less flattering for you I think. Possibly a little ‘nasal’?

    • @BillBene67
      @BillBene67 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree

    • @BRADRANCH
      @BRADRANCH ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you think the 103 is close enough in a professional studio? When everything is mixed and mastered would we hear a difference running through hardware that would also bring some nice harmonic distortion? Like a BAE 1073, Pultek EQ and 1176 Bluey going in to your DAW? I think that narrows the gap even more. Curious what you think. :)