I liked how she was very clear about what was a real telescope image versus an artist's interpretation. It's not a big deal, but some lectures are more ambiguous, and it's nice to see.
I'm glad she said all scientific understanding is provisional, and I think this is an especially important point in cosmology. The confusion for me is when cosmologists present theoretical information as if it is known fact. For example, her visual of the Brief History of the Universe shows "Inflation" for the first "fraction of a second"... without mentioning that when they extrapolate backwards to that first Planck Era, all the math and physics fall apart completely before they actually arrive at the singularity. The word "Inflation" is a placeholder for "We have no real definite good idea what happened", literally. But "Inflation" sounds better because it makes it seem like they do know. They don't, and any cosmologist with an ounce of integrity will say as much, if confronted with the question directly. Similarly, her next pie chart shows us the composition of the universe: 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter, and 4.6% Atoms. Never mind that they have no real idea what Dark Matter or Dark Energy are, they are just words... placeholders for completely unidentified entities, never empirically directly observed, postulated in order to explain away observations that can't be explained with our current understanding of physics. The list goes on and on... we blindly accept it when cosmologists say the "fabric" of "spacetime" curves in the presence of mass, causing the effect that we attribute to gravity. It must be so! The most famous smart person on Earth ever, said so in one of his most important theories, so who am I to dispute it? Yet... do the cosmologists ever explain to us, the intellectually curious lay public, what that "fabric" is composed of, such that it can be "curved"? "Spacetime"? What is that? If it's all around us, can't we collect some in a test tube and examine it more closely? Are we sure that this "fabric" of "spacetime" isn't just an abstract mathematical concept, a convenience that allows calculations to be made... as opposed to an actual substance or entity that actually exists in reality, the way they make it sound every time they talk about it? These are the things I find confusing, having these abstractions described to me by scientists who don't bother being careful qualifying their language to just admit that these aren't actual things known to exist. Admitting that would be problematic I suppose, but it would be more elucidating than confusing us constantly with all sorts of misstated counterintuitive "facts" that make our heads spin with the impossibility of conceptualizing their existence in any tangible way.
Using the Schwarzschild radius formula R = 2Gm/c^2 you can calculate the radius value for any object. The important point is that there will only be an event horizon present if the object lies completely inside the sphere defined by the radius. Now if you take a neutron star and gradually add mass, then the Schwarzschild radius increases in proportion to the mass and the radius of the surface of the star increases in proportion to the cube root of the mass. It follows that there will be a point where an event horizon forms and you can calculate this as 3.4 solar masses. Then any neutron star less than 3.4 solar masses can be visible and any neutron star greater than 3.4 solar masses will have an event horizon and will be considered to be a black hole. The proposal is that all black holes contain a neutron star of the corresponding mass. Such a black hole does not contain a singularity. See Appendix 7 of this paper: www.academia.edu/5009126/The_evolution_of_the_universe Richard
1:00:24 - 2017: She says "We can never see a black hole". But we did just 2 years later. Imagine in the next 2 years, after the James Webb Space Telescope has sent about a year of information. The wonders to come!
Our novel approach to the dark matter theory is our hypothesis that dark matter is just distortions in spactime by which the curvature alone is the cause of the gravity. Spactime has been observed to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating waves. These properties have been proven with observations of gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and recently gravitational waves. Fabrics can be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of deformation losing elasticity. Such extreme conditions were all present during inflation, so it is plausible that spacetime’s elastic nature hit its yield point and deformed. Therefore, if gravity is the direct result of warped spactime, and fabrics can be deformed, then a deformation of spacetime could create a gravitational effect independent of mass. Dark matter may simply be a particle of the spacetime’s structure, instead an exotic particle sitting in spacetime causing the warped geodesics.
Prediction 1: Spacetime's elastic property hits a yield point, so only that part of geodesic's "stretch marks" would remain after inflation stopped. These steep gravitational wells would not follow the inverse square law. Prediction 2: Since DM has no mass and is hypothesized to only be yielded geodesics, then black holes would not be able to contain DM. Black holes would just pass through DM imprints along with normal spacetime. I am looking for Observationalist to help test these predictions. jacegruber@g mail com
From observations of dark matter maps and from recreated computer simulated models of how dark matter reached that structure... the dark matter flows... collisionless,... to form structures and webs. It moves and shifts. Your theory of dark matter being a deformation in spacetime sounds like it can't flow and form structure. It sounds like it lacks fluidity. In essence, what we can already observe about dark matter suggests your theory is wrong. A deformation in plastic cannot flow and change shape, can it?
@@pboytrif1 Yes, dark matter moves. I suggest it is a floating fixed pocket of gravity wells. Good catch though, that is one of the issues I am working out. However, every 6 months or so new evidence comes out about DM and my hypothesis still hold up. Perhaps nothing has been detected because there is nothing to detect, and GR wouldn’t require modification of mass interactions because DM would just be an extension of how space-time behaves at extreme conditions. No WIMPS, no MOND, no parallel universes, just empty space-time imprints that produce gravity to help jump start the galaxy accretion process.
Further to my previous post. The proposal from the theory is that dark matter is made of neutron groups which are bonded neutrons in groups of two or more. You can think of the neutron group as an atomic nucleus with no protons. Neutrons bound in this way do not decay in general just as neutrons in an atomic nucleus are generally stable. Neutron groups do not interact with light as this requires electrons. Neutron groups do have mass which will be the sum of the masses of the neutrons less the mass deficit which is the binding energy. To see how these neutron groups form during galaxy formation see: www.academia.edu/5009126/The_evolution_of_the_universe Richard
I beg your pardon, but the term "Black Hole" as applied to the astrophysical phenomenon was coined by John Wheeler. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Archibald_Wheeler If he meant it as an allusion to "The Black Hole of Calcutta", I've never heard of it.
Gravity does not pull an object of mass toward another of greater mass, it [holds]. Gravity is an equative force of momentum (Gravity is force applied to an object object of mass/if I push two objects together with force, there's nothing to differentiate the difference between a hold, and a push-pull motion) {within motion to an orbit, an object effected by another's gravitational hold will have equalized mass within set position of orbit}
@Zeedijk Mike, I know, 3 years later but I totally agree. Its a very comprehensive overall explanation of what we know and what we wonder about dark matter. Clear observations and explanations of what we can infer from them. Plus, I agree she's a very good speaker.
Awesome lecture! I don’t deal with space much, but I am working on an amateur LSST data identification project. The idea of all this lensing makes me feel. 🧐😳😝🤦♂️
You really get the feeling she tells a story of "I want to beleive" scientific theories and facts? about universe, i am skeptical about how much really is fact and how much is a house of cards...
Why is the house of cards only science theories? If you can't trust what we see and then deduce from science, what do you trust? Might as well just stop living since nothing we observe has any truth to it, right? Just think: any idea you have about science has been pondered for hundreds of years. If you kept thinking that whole time, you would probably reach the same conclusions. Why? Because science is based on observation and prediction. If you can't trust observation, just stop living because everything is fake.
Only started (about 30 min in ), but why is she saying matter all the time when she should be saying mass ( I know it is called dark matter, that's not my point. My point is that the discrepancy in the spiral galactic rotation, that was observed, suggested there is a lot of extra mass that is having a gravitational effect on the outer stars, and not matter. Then it was coined that this has to be some kind of dark matter. ) ? Mass does not equal matter...For instance a black hole has a lot of mass not a lot of matter. Also when she is talking about how Einstein invented GE, she said he did it ex nihilo, so without trying to explain any anomalous observation, but wasn't one of the reasons, him trying to explain the discrepancy in the orbit of mercury that could not be explained by Newtons predictions ?
Wormhole in dementual cellular space time ripple refection of light thru the ripple & drag ripple can show the distortion amount. And energy valocity & directions. Via distortion ripple refaction 3d triangulation maping from if you take an image of The ripple in more than 1 angle to find velocity angle direction
My "Grand Fission" theory explains dark matter, dark energy, black holes, gravitational waves, gravity, the singularity (big bang,) etc., etc... pretty much everything you scratch your heads on. Btw, the "flat space" diagram should be bowed upward (dark [energy/NULL] lensing.) - Maybe someday I'll run into one of your peers and get assistance on verbiage whilst writing the papers on this (officially.) ;O)-
Δr.GMm.Δt≤ℏ.r^2/2 I say as the radius goes up the net integral over the expanding uncertainty being not linear does not sum to zero. A net inward addition to gravity. EM needs about 10 orders of radius higher for the same effect, and tangentially applied, it's more like dark energy.
I solved all of the millennium prize problems, is there anyone I can contact by email or phone to relay and look over the work? (Rewrote the first and second Third law, no need for the zeroth law)
(1st) For an isolated system energy can be created, doesn't matter if the work is done within an isolated system or not. Entropy is at a constant increase but cannot be used in a form of maximum or minimum (increase or decrease) potential until work is applied to the system. (No entropy increase or decrease until work is "done")Energy can be created within a system due to a reversal of entropy when maximum work is applied. (First law of thermodynamics) The 2nd law of thermodynamics used to state that entropy of system decreases over time. ( now is a constant/The definition is worked around now) It increases over time reaching a maximum value when a systems energy is at absolute 0. 3rd law of thermodynamics, entropy reaches a maximum at absolute zero.
could it be that dark matter, which repels regular matter and isn't seen, actually be antimatter which u also don't see and cause it would have to repel regular matter or else explosion. so thn the quintessence actually be wats sets in motion antimatter, regular matter and regular energy. energy being light so is the quintessence the primal light energy that gives rise to antimatter regular matter and regular light energy. Much Love 💙
Stars matter make matter reaction makeing electrons neutrons and protons sphere spring Legos flinging them out at near Wormhole velocity and in a vacuum the negative vacume energy kind of pulls the light energy along and as it vibrates and Boeing's the vacuum increases the velocity to the point that the particles strings ceased to have the ability to hold themselves together so the energy disperses at a certain point energy levels which is why you can only see so much and that's why there is a difference between observable universe and the actual universe cus the energy/partical waves hitting your inverted l.e.d. retina. In LEDs the electric extra electrons from the energy supplied vibrate back and forth creating an energy wave and when the extra electrons fling off at high velocities the particle / energy radiation wave (light) And how the tiny chain chomp fungi with kenetic force amplifying chains & texture on the fungi iluminateing radiation energy
Light thru a a.c. wormhole light wave/drag/partical fling so fast it nearly De time overlayed and the higgs boson titan dulan Lego limb moment so fast it destroys dementual wall cus energy not absorb the energy generates the wormhole in dementual cell structure And when the sphere spring Lego with tardis nerve wire thats y when they move so fast the energy overlay energy Lego spring de time overlay and once those strings detimetravels energy and disperses into oblivion And light actually can escape a black hole of the black hole would actually be so dense it would have a wormhole atmosphere and the light would just go into that Wormhole and the exit of the Wormhole is called a white hole
4d dementual selular like if enough structure in wormhole dna condenses and the 5d energytime overlay and like a surf wave like from a titan bio earthquake machine in the shape of a sphere spring legos that conect massively as sphere spring tops slowdown the angel time overlay compresses and boings like a Dullahan kenetic force amplifying chain giveing it self the over amour of amplify energy to maintain mass kenetic force 4 Constent interacting ...6 dementual is when you travel from one energy frequency to another Like what happens if structure into wormhole mud dauber XO skeleton nerve vulture residual chi eating off of gold people get struck bynon leathal a.c.lightning but the oscillation energy changes the frequency time overlay insted of dc dead And plant virus DNA shifter ware wolf mutated by furrys into a sexdrive activating form shifter and cross dressing ware girl ...0.13579... &ziondulahan carbon smoke element changing and gathering a.c. electrons and sleeping a.c. wormhole generation Pie & room tone are variable on the demention frequency frozen In the Lego sphere spring and Echo repeating pattern of slow down compression boing of energy waves like a ripple in a pond and like how a cloud can collect and compress into a huracane of the sphere springs legos spinning and connecting and stuck in energy waves and the vacuum of those waves like the drag energy on the dementual cellular wall and posible dimensional cellular wall multiple creature overlay each creature cellular wall strengthening the other creatures cellular wall while the 4D cellular and up creatures are in the same dimensional frequency area And how multiple Brava's could exist in sam.e plane of existance But a.c. lighting hiting 6d/4d cell frame..... change omniverse or multiverse demention position or mix of multiverse and omniverse cus like energy and frequency amound
Electrons sphere spring Lego conect at neer D time traveling energy levels higher the frequency Time Frozen together lower the light speed speed becuse Wormhole D time traveling itself over all energy level. So because at a lower energy frequency level Frozen can actually travel at a higher speed and the higher energy levels but the higher energy level frequency Frozen has a higher kinetic Force because the amount of energy transfer
did she read SuryaSiddhantha?. i feel pity for her ignorance, despite that she is pretending to be an intelligent scientist and historian. She is fixed on eurocentric mentality. Discovery doesn't happen only when Europeans know things. Has she heard words Jagath, Bhugole. These are ancient sanskrit terms which described earth as round and rotating. This is from books that are thousands of years old. What surprises me she said she came from Delhi but doesn't know her own books. Other than that i like the presentation. i think quantum field theory is a better explanation of reality. More we look deep more we realize matter doesn't matter. we need to come out of this fixation on matter/ particles. Again this opinion is from a neurologist not a professional physicist.
Dear Dr Natajaran, I am greatly offended by your use of a reference to the "Black Hole of Calcutta" in your attempt to establish a dubious heritage for the term in Physics "Black Hole". Your revisionist and wrong headed use of this reference to a recognised war crime is completely unacceptable. The contextual reference alluded to "black hole" as a circumstance beyond human honour and dignity. Your flippant use of it to establish some spurious heritage for an astrophysical term is pathetic. Please do not do it again. Or maybe I'll start suggesting that supernovae are exploding like a mutineer off a British cannon. But that would be disrespectful, wouldn't it? Please grow up.
Gravity ...sphere spring Lego spring spiral Lego connection force On top of energy resenice vibriteing the Lego conections more matter there is to resonate more overall gravitational energy compressing the energy connecting the Lego sphere Springs that's why different planets have different gravity levels because the overall amount of matter that resonates together for the Legos to sticking force cus coiling of sphere springs grabs the other electrons neutrons and protons of variable spin Direction and energy time overlay angle bringing the kinetic energy time Frozen with in up while simultaneously if the spring is expanded AKa heated up the legos let go aka melt or going around like steam And the energy drag of the energy waves time overlaid also has vacuum energy waves also time overlay because of the vacuum back side of like an ocean wave ...aka inti matter & anti matter generates so much energy cus the vacuum energy sphere Springs if they weren't caught in the drag feeding them vacume energy in there coiling and boinging. But when the vacume over lay interacts the upward positive energy and the vacuum negative energy flings against itself like a dimensional cellular elasticity snap and that snap energy is the kinetic release of antimatter to matter and matter to antimatter snap
As a geographer, young map enthusiast and fan of cosmology, Dr Natarajan is my new hero. ☮️❤️
I liked how she was very clear about what was a real telescope image versus an artist's interpretation. It's not a big deal, but some lectures are more ambiguous, and it's nice to see.
I'm glad she said all scientific understanding is provisional, and I think this is an especially important point in cosmology. The confusion for me is when cosmologists present theoretical information as if it is known fact.
For example, her visual of the Brief History of the Universe shows "Inflation" for the first "fraction of a second"... without mentioning that when they extrapolate backwards to that first Planck Era, all the math and physics fall apart completely before they actually arrive at the singularity. The word "Inflation" is a placeholder for "We have no real definite good idea what happened", literally. But "Inflation" sounds better because it makes it seem like they do know. They don't, and any cosmologist with an ounce of integrity will say as much, if confronted with the question directly.
Similarly, her next pie chart shows us the composition of the universe: 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter, and 4.6% Atoms. Never mind that they have no real idea what Dark Matter or Dark Energy are, they are just words... placeholders for completely unidentified entities, never empirically directly observed, postulated in order to explain away observations that can't be explained with our current understanding of physics.
The list goes on and on... we blindly accept it when cosmologists say the "fabric" of "spacetime" curves in the presence of mass, causing the effect that we attribute to gravity. It must be so! The most famous smart person on Earth ever, said so in one of his most important theories, so who am I to dispute it? Yet... do the cosmologists ever explain to us, the intellectually curious lay public, what that "fabric" is composed of, such that it can be "curved"? "Spacetime"? What is that? If it's all around us, can't we collect some in a test tube and examine it more closely? Are we sure that this "fabric" of "spacetime" isn't just an abstract mathematical concept, a convenience that allows calculations to be made... as opposed to an actual substance or entity that actually exists in reality, the way they make it sound every time they talk about it?
These are the things I find confusing, having these abstractions described to me by scientists who don't bother being careful qualifying their language to just admit that these aren't actual things known to exist. Admitting that would be problematic I suppose, but it would be more elucidating than confusing us constantly with all sorts of misstated counterintuitive "facts" that make our heads spin with the impossibility of conceptualizing their existence in any tangible way.
Thank you, Dr. Natarajan and Fermilab, for a technical yet understandable presentation! I enjoyed it very much!
Talk begins at 2:40
Technically it starts at 11:40 :-)
realtalk
Excellent opening statement, "what is science?"
something that every Donald Trump supporter lays awake at night wondering, and then instantly flinches their mind away from the answer!
Thank you so much for uploading this!
Using the Schwarzschild radius formula R = 2Gm/c^2 you can calculate the radius value for any object. The important point is that there will only be an event horizon present if the object lies completely inside the sphere defined by the radius.
Now if you take a neutron star and gradually add mass, then the Schwarzschild radius increases in proportion to the mass and the radius of the surface of the star increases in proportion to the cube root of the mass. It follows that there will be a point where an event horizon forms and you can calculate this as 3.4 solar masses.
Then any neutron star less than 3.4 solar masses can be visible and any neutron star greater than 3.4 solar masses will have an event horizon and will be considered to be a black hole. The proposal is that all black holes contain a neutron star of the corresponding mass. Such a black hole does not contain a singularity.
See Appendix 7 of this paper:
www.academia.edu/5009126/The_evolution_of_the_universe
Richard
And we have got picture of black hole as predicted by her in this lecture :)
1:00:24 - 2017: She says "We can never see a black hole". But we did just 2 years later. Imagine in the next 2 years, after the James Webb Space Telescope has sent about a year of information. The wonders to come!
27:59 I just love the picture of Zwicky. He's like _I don't know what's going on either, but something sure doesn't fit here_ 😂
Our novel approach to the dark matter theory is our hypothesis that dark matter is just distortions in spactime by which the curvature alone is the cause of the gravity. Spactime has been observed to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating waves. These properties have been proven with observations of gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and recently gravitational waves. Fabrics can be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of deformation losing elasticity. Such extreme conditions were all present during inflation, so it is plausible that spacetime’s elastic nature hit its yield point and deformed. Therefore, if gravity is the direct result of warped spactime, and fabrics can be deformed, then a deformation of spacetime could create a gravitational effect independent of mass. Dark matter may simply be a particle of the spacetime’s structure, instead an exotic particle sitting in spacetime causing the warped geodesics.
Prediction 1: Spacetime's elastic property hits a yield point, so only that part of geodesic's "stretch marks" would remain after inflation stopped. These steep gravitational wells would not follow the inverse square law.
Prediction 2: Since DM has no mass and is hypothesized to only be yielded geodesics, then black holes would not be able to contain DM. Black holes would just pass through DM imprints along with normal spacetime.
I am looking for Observationalist to help test these predictions. jacegruber@g mail com
From observations of dark matter maps and from recreated computer simulated models of how dark matter reached that structure... the dark matter flows... collisionless,... to form structures and webs. It moves and shifts. Your theory of dark matter being a deformation in spacetime sounds like it can't flow and form structure. It sounds like it lacks fluidity. In essence, what we can already observe about dark matter suggests your theory is wrong. A deformation in plastic cannot flow and change shape, can it?
@@pboytrif1 Yes, dark matter moves. I suggest it is a floating fixed pocket of gravity wells. Good catch though, that is one of the issues I am working out. However, every 6 months or so new evidence comes out about DM and my hypothesis still hold up. Perhaps nothing has been detected because there is nothing to detect, and GR wouldn’t require modification of mass interactions because DM would just be an extension of how space-time behaves at extreme conditions. No WIMPS, no MOND, no parallel universes, just empty space-time imprints that produce gravity to help jump start the galaxy accretion process.
Wonderful video! Thanks!
I kept my cell phone on for the whole lecture.
Excellent!!!
Great lecture.
I totally agree, of course Pluto is a planet.
Amazing lecture -- I am enjoying listening to a copy of your book Mapping the Heavens
I find her a very effective communicator. I'm a fan!
also any update from event horizon telescope
Further to my previous post. The proposal from the theory is that dark matter is made of neutron groups which are bonded neutrons in groups of two or more. You can think of the neutron group as an atomic nucleus with no protons. Neutrons bound in this way do not decay in general just as neutrons in an atomic nucleus are generally stable.
Neutron groups do not interact with light as this requires electrons. Neutron groups do have mass which will be the sum of the masses of the neutrons less the mass deficit which is the binding energy.
To see how these neutron groups form during galaxy formation see:
www.academia.edu/5009126/The_evolution_of_the_universe
Richard
What kind of measured evidence we have about the black matter forms a halo vs black matter is concentrated?
I beg your pardon, but the term "Black Hole" as applied to the astrophysical phenomenon was coined by John Wheeler. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Archibald_Wheeler
If he meant it as an allusion to "The Black Hole of Calcutta", I've never heard of it.
Space-time is a fun-house mirror. :)
Why does this have to be "matter" ?
Can't gravitational waves create stable harmonics to prevent stuff from flying out ?
Gravity does not pull an object of mass toward another of greater mass, it [holds]. Gravity is an equative force of momentum (Gravity is force applied to an object object of mass/if I push two objects together with force, there's nothing to differentiate the difference between a hold, and a push-pull motion) {within motion to an orbit, an object effected by another's gravitational hold will have equalized mass within set position of orbit}
@Zeedijk Mike, I know, 3 years later but I totally agree. Its a very comprehensive overall explanation of what we know and what we wonder about dark matter. Clear observations and explanations of what we can infer from them. Plus, I agree she's a very good speaker.
Brilliant lecture with loads of interesting and existing information. Helped greatly by a very good speaker.
Imagine we had all the videos of all the people self-confidently asserting that the sun goes around the earth?
I was about to go to sleep! ..... guess i'm watchin a lecture now.
Good teacher
If theres all this dark matter how come they dont have any to show?
because of "knowledge" like this humanity is still and will be on Earth for a long, long time :)
How well does the mass based on lensing agrees - or disagrees - with that based on galaxy velocities and the virial theorem?
Outstanding lecture!!! Great explanation about contribution of DM versus ordinary matter to BH. Last question....thank you!!!
sadly, the more important things in life, get the smallest attention and respect
like true love!!!
Awesome lecture! I don’t deal with space much, but I am working on an amateur LSST data identification project. The idea of all this lensing makes me feel. 🧐😳😝🤦♂️
And enough matter collect together in a small enough area the density would be high enough to generate a wormhole atmosphere
Isn't closed loop strings, act as quantum graviton?
You really get the feeling she tells a story of "I want to beleive" scientific theories and facts? about universe, i am skeptical about how much really is fact and how much is a house of cards...
Why is the house of cards only science theories? If you can't trust what we see and then deduce from science, what do you trust? Might as well just stop living since nothing we observe has any truth to it, right? Just think: any idea you have about science has been pondered for hundreds of years. If you kept thinking that whole time, you would probably reach the same conclusions. Why? Because science is based on observation and prediction. If you can't trust observation, just stop living because everything is fake.
fantastic !!! .. became aware of this lecture on CBC.ca/IDEAS driving in the country
Imagine what scientists will be discussing in 200 years from now.
Only started (about 30 min in ), but why is she saying matter all the time when she should be saying mass ( I know it is called dark matter, that's not my point. My point is that the discrepancy in the spiral galactic rotation, that was observed, suggested there is a lot of extra mass that is having a gravitational effect on the outer stars, and not matter. Then it was coined that this has to be some kind of dark matter. ) ? Mass does not equal matter...For instance a black hole has a lot of mass not a lot of matter. Also when she is talking about how Einstein invented GE, she said he did it ex nihilo, so without trying to explain any anomalous observation, but wasn't one of the reasons, him trying to explain the discrepancy in the orbit of mercury that could not be explained by Newtons predictions ?
Thank you for this informative upload :)
Wormhole in dementual cellular space time ripple refection of light thru the ripple & drag ripple can show the distortion amount. And energy valocity & directions. Via distortion ripple refaction 3d triangulation maping from if you take an image of The ripple in more than 1 angle to find velocity angle direction
A minor fly in the ointment... LOL I love this speaker!
nice radical thinking
keep it up!
My "Grand Fission" theory explains dark matter, dark energy, black holes, gravitational waves, gravity, the singularity (big bang,) etc., etc... pretty much everything you scratch your heads on. Btw, the "flat space" diagram should be bowed upward (dark [energy/NULL] lensing.) - Maybe someday I'll run into one of your peers and get assistance on verbiage whilst writing the papers on this (officially.) ;O)-
If dark matter is the scaffolding for galaxies formation, what is the scaffolding of the dark matter's scaffolding?
Our very limited and probably wrong understanding of gravity, and the higgs field.
I imagine that dark matter is put into place as the inflationary material becomes sub-luminal, and then baryonic matter follows and clumps to it.
my concept of understanding of dark matter is somewhat different!
Δr.GMm.Δt≤ℏ.r^2/2 I say as the radius goes up the net integral over the expanding uncertainty being not linear does not sum to zero. A net inward addition to gravity. EM needs about 10 orders of radius higher for the same effect, and tangentially applied, it's more like dark energy.
*applause!
I solved all of the millennium prize problems, is there anyone I can contact by email or phone to relay and look over the work? (Rewrote the first and second Third law, no need for the zeroth law)
(1st) For an isolated system energy can be created, doesn't matter if the work is done within an isolated system or not. Entropy is at a constant increase but cannot be used in a form of maximum or minimum (increase or decrease) potential until work is applied to the system. (No entropy increase or decrease until work is "done")Energy can be created within a system due to a reversal of entropy when maximum work is applied. (First law of thermodynamics)
The 2nd law of thermodynamics used to state that entropy of system decreases over time. ( now is a constant/The definition is worked around now) It increases over time reaching a maximum value when a systems energy is at absolute 0.
3rd law of thermodynamics, entropy reaches a maximum at absolute zero.
Wrote 105.
Poincare conjuncture was wrong.
Last answer for. (Add to last test)
Ganjanaut www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/rules-millennium-prizes
Dark Matter is the goth kid of the universe.
when was dark matter proven to exist. Isn't it just a theory. Astrophysicists should remember this.
could it be that dark matter, which repels regular matter and isn't seen, actually be antimatter which u also don't see and cause it would have to repel regular matter or else explosion. so thn the quintessence actually be wats sets in motion antimatter, regular matter and regular energy. energy being light so is the quintessence the primal light energy that gives rise to antimatter regular matter and regular light energy. Much Love 💙
And light bending spring partical side boinging deflecting
39:00 I only heard butthole. :/
people deny science because it doesn't fit into theirs beliefs or opinions.
And sphere spring Lego grind energy boinging eating off of matter make matter star reation
So light is both partical and energy
Stars matter make matter reaction makeing electrons neutrons and protons sphere spring Legos flinging them out at near Wormhole velocity and in a vacuum the negative vacume energy kind of pulls the light energy along and as it vibrates and Boeing's the vacuum increases the velocity to the point that the particles strings ceased to have the ability to hold themselves together so the energy disperses at a certain point energy levels which is why you can only see so much and that's why there is a difference between observable universe and the actual universe cus the energy/partical waves hitting your inverted l.e.d. retina.
In LEDs the electric extra electrons from the energy supplied vibrate back and forth creating an energy wave and when the extra electrons fling off at high velocities the particle / energy radiation wave (light)
And how the tiny chain chomp fungi with kenetic force amplifying chains & texture on the fungi iluminateing radiation energy
Sea-unce iz kool 👌🇺🇸
Light thru a a.c. wormhole light wave/drag/partical fling so fast it nearly De time overlayed and the higgs boson titan dulan Lego limb moment so fast it destroys dementual wall cus energy not absorb the energy generates the wormhole in dementual cell structure
And when the sphere spring Lego with tardis nerve wire thats y when they move so fast the energy overlay energy Lego spring de time overlay and once those strings detimetravels energy and disperses into oblivion
And light actually can escape a black hole of the black hole would actually be so dense it would have a wormhole atmosphere and the light would just go into that Wormhole and the exit of the Wormhole is called a white hole
Open minded, huh? That is getting harder to find in the academic industrial complex.
I thought she was casting a spell or some shit in the thumbnail.
4d dementual selular like if enough structure in wormhole dna condenses and the 5d energytime overlay and like a surf wave like from a titan bio earthquake machine in the shape of a sphere spring legos that conect massively as sphere spring tops slowdown the angel time overlay compresses and boings like a Dullahan kenetic force amplifying chain giveing it self the over amour of amplify energy to maintain mass kenetic force 4 Constent interacting ...6 dementual is when you travel from one energy frequency to another
Like what happens if structure into wormhole mud dauber XO skeleton nerve vulture residual chi eating off of gold people get struck bynon leathal a.c.lightning but the oscillation energy changes the frequency time overlay insted of dc dead
And plant virus DNA shifter ware wolf mutated by furrys into a sexdrive activating form shifter and cross dressing ware girl
...0.13579...
&ziondulahan carbon smoke element changing and gathering a.c. electrons and sleeping a.c. wormhole generation
Pie & room tone are variable on the demention frequency frozen
In the Lego sphere spring and Echo repeating pattern of slow down compression boing of energy waves like a ripple in a pond and like how a cloud can collect and compress into a huracane of the sphere springs legos spinning and connecting and stuck in energy waves and the vacuum of those waves like the drag energy on the dementual cellular wall and posible dimensional cellular wall multiple creature overlay each creature cellular wall strengthening the other creatures cellular wall while the 4D cellular and up creatures are in the same dimensional frequency area
And how multiple Brava's could exist in sam.e plane of existance
But a.c. lighting hiting 6d/4d cell frame..... change omniverse or multiverse demention position or mix of multiverse and omniverse cus like energy and frequency amound
Electrons sphere spring Lego conect at neer D time traveling energy levels higher the frequency Time Frozen together lower the light speed speed becuse Wormhole D time traveling itself over all energy level. So because at a lower energy frequency level Frozen can actually travel at a higher speed and the higher energy levels but the higher energy level frequency Frozen has a higher kinetic Force because the amount of energy transfer
Martin Ruth White Michael Hall John
did she read SuryaSiddhantha?. i feel pity for her ignorance, despite that she is pretending to be an intelligent scientist and historian. She is fixed on eurocentric mentality. Discovery doesn't happen only when Europeans know things. Has she heard words Jagath, Bhugole. These are ancient sanskrit terms which described earth as round and rotating. This is from books that are thousands of years old. What surprises me she said she came from Delhi but doesn't know her own books. Other than that i like the presentation. i think quantum field theory is a better explanation of reality. More we look deep more we realize matter doesn't matter. we need to come out of this fixation on matter/ particles. Again this opinion is from a neurologist not a professional physicist.
be weary of fast talkers.
Love that mic buzz! Jk lol...
They are all selling Hubble Bubble.
H h
Dear Dr Natajaran, I am greatly offended by your use of a reference to the "Black Hole of Calcutta" in your attempt to establish a dubious heritage for the term in Physics "Black Hole". Your revisionist and wrong headed use of this reference to a recognised war crime is completely unacceptable. The contextual reference alluded to "black hole" as a circumstance beyond human honour and dignity. Your flippant use of it to establish some spurious heritage for an astrophysical term is pathetic. Please do not do it again. Or maybe I'll start suggesting that supernovae are exploding like a mutineer off a British cannon. But that would be disrespectful, wouldn't it? Please grow up.
Keep your voice down
Gravity ...sphere spring Lego spring spiral Lego connection force On top of energy resenice vibriteing the Lego conections more matter there is to resonate more overall gravitational energy compressing the energy connecting the Lego sphere Springs that's why different planets have different gravity levels
because the overall amount of matter that resonates together for the Legos to sticking force
cus coiling of sphere springs grabs the other electrons neutrons and protons of variable spin Direction and energy time overlay angle bringing the kinetic energy time Frozen with in up while simultaneously if the spring is expanded AKa heated up the legos let go aka melt or going around like steam
And the energy drag of the energy waves time overlaid also has vacuum energy waves also time overlay because of the vacuum back side of like an ocean wave ...aka inti matter
& anti matter generates so much energy cus the vacuum energy sphere Springs if they weren't caught in the drag feeding them vacume energy in there coiling and boinging. But when the vacume over lay interacts the upward positive energy and the vacuum negative energy flings against itself like a dimensional cellular elasticity snap and that snap energy is the kinetic release of antimatter to matter and matter to antimatter snap