Brian Greene is the best physics panel moderator because he's an accomplished physicist. Many times I have seen him gently bring a bickering panel of scientists back to the topic at hand, which is only possible if you understand the topic at hand.
Atheists And God Worshipers Live In Deceit Truth Is Existence Truth is All That Truly Exists. Other Than Truth there is Just The understood Concept of An Absence. Lies with intent to deceive or not is fantasy. Lies remain in the nonexistent realm. The Great Designer and Creator, Matter, Knowledge, Energy, Time and Space Has Always Existed. All Without Beginning or end. Beginning and End only reveals an absence. Creation is only the rearrangement of Matter. As Existence and Matter does not evolve from nothing. Spirit Is The Highest Energy Source. Gods Are Imaginary Personages Of Worship, Gods are Fantasy! Gods are not creators. There are Hundreds of Gods that the human has worshipped. The Great Creator is far more Massive and complex than the God worshipers realize and understand. The Great Creator is not a being somewhere in space. The Great Creator is a huge mass of spirits in perfect unity. And with the same care for each another. Words to the honest and wise: honesty and understanding is the only true belief. Without honesty and understanding we do not know what to believe. To accept other’s opinion of the truth without proving it to yourself; it is being deceived it is not believing. We must understand to believe. Until Next time: Sweet Dreams: Truth will solve all our problems before we create them; and ignore or reject the truth; problems will multiply all by themselves; those problems will need no help. Have a great and a meaningful life if it is at all possible. Just whispers, of the Spirit of Reality.
Brian is so GOOD at this! Everytime something is going over my head, Brian steps in and slows it down or makes a summary of the discussion. It’s almost scary how important he is for the event🥺
Whenever i click a random video about Physics or Space and stuff like that, and i see a stage, chairs, and then Brian Greene i get really excited and happy. I love these shows and i can't wait to watch all of these, i hope these come more often and go on for way much longer!
Perhaps you should read my opinion I wrote on the other TH-cam dark matter black mass , if your interested in dark matter , my version might make you think , it’s just an opinion but you might think about things differently... Black mass is seeping into our atmosphere already ..
I love this panel style of explaining theories... If you just watch one person being interviewed, or a documentary of like minded scientists, they often say something like, "This is how we know that is, or is not the case... and that is the way it is". This way you see the emotion involved in the theories and there are other views and it's all incomplete. Much more informative in an important way.
I don't like DM, at least in the way its been conceptualized, and I like alternative views as well as Erik's. But his theory has many problems and is most likely wrong. It's crazy to me how DM as a particle is either totally wrong or of an energy scale that we can never achieve yet no one will quite admit it BC they want more funding. And so the charade continues at the neglect of more important studies where all this funding could be routed. The DM issue Is so complex. They find Galaxy after Galaxy where there isn't any DM at all. But it's also very conceivable that it+' mass is too large for us to recreate. I think our understanding of gravity at large scales is incomplete.. I sure brought a different point of view didn't I? No one spoke of these ideas before me! N
What I love about science... notice, people with a different point a view and they are not yelling or trying to shoot each other... This is so much better then "other" discussions such as politics and religion...
Thanks Dr. Green and others for putting this great discussion. I never formally studied physics after 10th standard however, I've been following the theories and concepts continuously for last 3 years online and trying to train myself whatever a little I can. (I first got interested after I read A Brief History of Time) I want to know as the physics unfolds itself upon us in my lifetime.
I was born with many difficulties in my life. Although I am not fully educated, I have a strong love for science and the universe. Thank you for bringing it to me. Love you
It sounds pretty logical to me when he says that it doesn't feel right to use a constant to describe 70% of the universe, when we have done so much analysis on the 5%.
They always seem to put the guy with the most juice in the chair farthest from Brian. That way when he or she speaks, everyone else is between them and Brian. I don't think it's a coincidence- so the seating assignment is a clue as to who is batting clean-up.
Great talk! Many thanks! Inspiration from this talk... Hyphothesis E: If Spirits exit, thus Spiritual Realms (where Supernatural Beings live) also exit. Thus, by proving higher dimensional hyperspace exits via String Theory (and dark matter/dark universe, possible evidence could be detected using collision of higher dimensional frequencies), human beings can then deduce/induce that "we are not alone in this universe/multiverses".
If you can remain in the middle then we know total peace, all-knowingness, and the epitome of simplicity. Always was is now and will never end. Great Stuff, Thank you
I started binging physics lectures a few years ago, I work construction and listen while I work, I’m not an expert by any means but I did have an basic understanding of relativity and the standard model before I started but I can’t tell you how incredibly awesome this stuff gets, keep on binging man, you won’t regret it.
Really excellent moderation allowed an equal taste of all these different theories trying to account for one of the greatest mysteries of our times. As an aside, perhaps one day these brilliant minds will come up with an explanation of where socks go when we put them in the dryer. We know there is a basic symmetry to socks - they always come in pairs. Yet when they come out of the dryer there is always an odd one, breaking the symmetry. Energy must be involved in breaking the covalent bond between the pairs of socks, and we know the heat in the dryer must play a part. This also has implications involving information theory and entropy. Perhaps the answer lies somewhere at the intersection of supersymmetry and string theory.
This has been tested. If you put them in the dryer all together in one mesh laundry bag they found you never lose any! Also if you were to check the grommet around the dryer and even sometimes the washer you may a couple. But they never truly disappear just collect in a tough to find spot or you never actually put them in but thought you did.
Most interesting view, your guests were diplomatic and informative. They defended their position but also allowed for the possibility of being wrong. Very smart. Personally, I gained insight into what my thoughts could be. I am a layperson, I know no formulas except that I exist in this beautiful world that we should protect and get to know in a more personal way. Thank you Dr. Greene
Not so easy for nonsapiens, so please consider this... Spacial distortion bending the path of light, also distorts the frequency of light emitted from super heavy distant galaxies. Gravity from distant galaxies has a redshift effect on the frequency of light they emit in the same way that gravity can bend the path of light from a light source behind the gravitational field. Dark energy is an illusion caused by a spacial distortion caused by the gravitational fields of the distant galaxies emitting the light. Hence no cosmic acceleration, no dark energy causing acceleration, no unaccounted for dark matter, and certainly, no big bang. This universe is eternal, without beginning or ending. Cosmic background microwaves are but distant galaxies who's light has been gravitationally distorted beyond your visible spectrum. Galaxies continually exchange and recycle energy and birth new stars out of old dead ones for ever and ever. How do you think light escapes super heavy distant galaxies with its frequency visually unaffected by spacial distortions? Someday sapien's evolutionary decendents might survive travel to distant galaxies and discover the return trip doesn't take require extra travel time, as no acceleration is actually occuring.
Incredibly enlightening discussion involving researchers at the bleeding edge. Fascinating. World science festival has quickly become my favourite channel. Thank you all of you who are involved in this work.
@@craigwall9536 I didn't know a conjunction was a question. I guess my grammar book is out of date. Perhaps 'and?' replaces the eternal 'why?' of a young child. My statement is complete. Your inability to comprehend it is your problem.
@@stevelenores5637 AND means you've got _nothing._ You obviously can't extend your comment to anything meaningful. Which is pretty damned _lame,_ since it's obvious that "Dark Matter" is a repeat of "Luminiferous Ether", meaning they've gone down the wrong "common sense" path and got their heads into a funnel. Gamow et al figured this out in the 1950's and pointed out that the galactic milieu is _viscous;_ since then the viscosity has been attributed to Baryonic Virtual Quantum interactions. There ain't no "missing matter", dark or otherwise. They've simply mistaken viscosity for gravity.
@@craigwall9536 It means no such thing. What you are telling me is I'm not allowed to have my own observations. I'm not allowed to see what I saw and heard, and then imply my understanding of what was missing. "AND" is simply rude and dismissive. Appealing to authority will not bail you out. What I said was accurate. Prove Neil deGrasse didn't make the claim I stated at first. I made no comment on Gamow. You are simply deflecting.
New to this. Stunning that the earth, planets and stars are held in fixed positions, floating about in this dark stuff that no one can figure out. Amazing.
World science festival is a great platform to understand a lot of things about science. I think Dr Green is one finest speakers and he explains everything in simple language so those who didn't have much exposure in science can understand the principles and core idea of discussion very well. Thank you for having such a website and discussion. It will attract more people to learn science and start thinking logically about the universe.
WSF presents wonderful discussions and are addictive too. I end up wanting to watch one after the other. I presently constrain myself to just one a day, like a vitamin.
that's a good way to put it! logically, the actors know the cinema screen will be somewhere, eventually. but there's no way for them to know or see where or when that will be, same as us trying to find 'dark' matter and energy
I’ve never heard anybody talking about what if there were lots of big bangs, and they are like bubbles in a bubble bath. Wouldn’t they pull on each other and cause this kind of acceleration? We can’t see our entire universe (our local big bang , so we wouldn’t be able to see any of the others. They could have happened all at once, for anybody knows.
I read her Wikipedia article as a result of her mention in this program. It sounds like she was done out of the Nobel prize and this is the view of a number of her contemporaries and subsequent members of related disciplines to Cosmology. She had four children as well and did much work from home. A true trailblazer of women's equality.
Start focussing on the fact that time could have mass. This will lead us to what dark matter is as well as give us a clearer indication as to what gravity actually is and how we should treat time fields around objects of matter/mass. Time, Mass and the Higgs Boson are inextricably linked to Gravity and each other but it is not in the way most physicist are thinking. Dark energy is going to be a shocker of some kind because it looks like it may play into the Einsteins General Relativity and the tweak needed to his equation. Great presentation, thank you!
and no new physics is actually needed. It is already all there, we just need to re-arrange a few things and make a couple of small tweaks...and yes, I am proposing that the HB is the fundamental particle of time, if time does indeed have mass.
I thought Brian was the only respectable theoretical physicist left out there. Everyone else is afraid of I don't know and just vomits whatever pays the most all over the stage.
Great talk, really enjoyed that. And, I think very well moderated by BG, who kept everything going and interesting. I think Erik Verlinde is a man to take notice of. I was a little puzzled that the intro notes made no reference to the fact that this talk was filmed on the anniversary of the solar eclipse of 29th May, 1919, as observed by Sir Arthur Eddington and colleague, which was very significant, because it was the first observational proof of the validity of Einstein’s theory of GR. Brian Greene did allude to this in his opening introduction, but some people may have wondered what he was referring to, and when this talk was filmed.
These people need to actually read Erik's papers, which are great and actually reproduce general relativity - with corrections that add the extra gravity that is ascribed to dark matter.
I recently read an interesting article--In 1920, lecturing at the University of Leiden, on the topic "Ether and the Theory of Relativity," Einstein stated outright that the ether did exist, that it was necessary as a medium of transfer because light also had wave-like properties. He even wrote Lorentz to clarify this point. But by now, the damage had been done. This lecture received little notice, it was ignored in Roland Clark's watershed biography on Einstein published in 1971, and so the 20th and early 21st centuries evolved in such a way to dismiss entirely ether theory.
That was interesting discussion, thanks Greene and all. There's very good material in net and youtube today. Been watching these vids and studying some physics recently. Couldn't fit all sort of topics which interested me into my degree when I was in university; so now I'm filling those bkind spots.
Thank you, one and all. Revisiting this topic on the birth of the James Webb Space Telescope. Thinking at least two of the four presenters will have time to collect data for their theory there.
Thank you Brian Green! There are no words apt for describing how important the dissemination of the WSF is for us, the lay people of the planet. In the past, even with years and years of education, one would not have access to this information, nor the plethora of subjects addressed by the WSF. My biggest hope is that more and more people get interested in science, biology, mathematics, astrophysics etc., and that this serves as a catalyst for a neo civilized population who can determine for themselves wether information is credible or not, and make decisions based on evidence and logic, while optimising outcomes in a secular and humanist framework. You are a great man, and your pioneering vision will outlive you and your grandkids. Really bro, thank you.
Gravity keeps me on the ground and it's not a particle. These "super" smart scientist think dark matter that keeps the universe together is a particle...
William Peterson Perhaps so... but the concept of there being a _single_ external objective reality that we all share _ought_ to be a fundamental underlying principle of _all_ facets of life, not just science. and now even science has become corrupted by the intrusion of politics in areas such as Anthropogenic Global Warming Denialism. It is important to show the concept of objective reality being applied successfully in scientific research, and the same concept ought to be applied in politics, journalism, the rule of law, and in the study of history, for example. This should be part of our standard education system. The recent trend toward relativism, obfuscation, conspiracy theories, and outright serial lying poses an existential threat to the stability of our society. This danger should be apparent to _everyone_ not just those who seem superficially to benefit from it in the short-term. Science can serve as an example that multiple realities, if they exist at all, may only be relevant at Quantum scale, and should not be invoked in a cynical political strategy intended to promote confusion and divergence of "worldviews" within our culture.
MendTheWorld Hmm.....Trillions Of visible, invisible layers of stuff? With trillions of trillions of Connectivity? There is no difference between any layer of stuff! And-Just paid experts? Giving an opinion, of where the Tree is rooted. By the roots in the ground or rooted by the branches in the invisible ether! There is something quite dramatic that being in the rut of a percentage of 5% Known, drawing conclusions about the 100% Unknown unknowables Which seems archaic! The impeachment inquiry and Dark Stuff are the same thing, it is Incomplete Understanding Of Anything.....So it does not matter what you watch, it is watching You anyway, by hook or by crook!
Combine: 1. cosmological constant 2. schrodinger solution 3. Planck E= h f= h n 4. n = number of superpositions And you get dark matter n^2 h^2 / ( 8 m L^2) = h n m = 0.3313 10^18 10^-34 = 0.3313 10^-16 kg ( all superpositions). 1 particle = 0.331 10^-16 / ( 0.4 10^18) = 0.828 10^-34 kg = 46 eV If you count only the positive wave function amplitudes: n = 10^9 then dark matter = WIMP m = 46 GeV
What makes us think that we could possibly see every little thing out in an infinite universe to claim there may be dark matter or dark energy. I just think there's way to many other planets, blackhokes, stars etc that we haven't seen or found yet. That would make more sense then just guessing up a new force.
Crazy isn't it?! So it means we don't actually know what the galaxy/universe looks like right now for all we know there could have been a huge universal catastrophe and the majority of the universe as exploded but we have no idea because none of the light, matter or material has reached us yet 😂
This is one of the better panel discussions. Normally I prefer individual lectures. Sean Carroll, Carolin Crawford, Feryal Ozel, Neil Turok, David Kaplan...
Mariangela has a cold. Joe wants to defend his turf but Erik is rolling right over him. Risa is a mechanic with busy-work to do. Brian is making it all look easy but he'd much rather just talk to Erik.
I agree. I also happen to suspect that modern cosmologists have neglected the earlier discussions of viscosity when finding the galactic rotation acts like a nearly solid disk. George Gamow was pointing this out back in the 30's. I guess they don't appreciate the difference between gases and particulates.
The whole panel was excellent but @1:08 where Eric shows the graph and says "the critical value [where the expected vs observed rotation rates diverge] is connected to the expansion rate of the universe" --- now THAT really got my attention.
The Eclipse does not show that Space is curved!!! The motion of Light is Geodesic in Nature, which means that the motion of Light in Space-Time is curved. There are no straight lines in Space-Time. A straight line between two points is curved, is called a minor arch, according to Einstein.
@@92587wayne Doesn't have to, it's a confirmation of the general theory of relativity. Calculation of star position more consistent with Einsteins formula, then with Newton's formulas. Did you know there was a calculation for the star positions based on Newton? There was a small error with Einstein's work too but error was within limits of the instruments they were using at the time.
My last comment about a standard model of space is influenced by the hypothesis some physicists have that first there is Inflation and then there is the Big Bang. That hypothesis implies empty space expanding then time, matter and energy emerging. If that hypothesis is true then it's more important to focus on space than on matter.
@@XraynPR we observe galaxies behaving and moving in ways that we dont understand and that we believe shouldnt be happening according to our understanding and since that behaviour and movement, according to our understanding, should be dictated by gravity we simply had to apply to this phenomena the only thing we could think of to inject into the equation that we assume affects gravity- mass. What has mass? Matter. Since we cant see, or detect the unseen matter, they just added the comic book element to it by calling it dark. Brilliant.
@@thetroof5525 we couldn't see some planets like Neptune a while back, yet knew it was there. It's a bit more complicated. It's either Dark Matter or something entirely new, which is more unlikely. Even stuff like MOND seems insufficient.
@@XraynPR dark matter is "something new". It's the textbook definition of "something new". We have no idea what it is. Just because they postulated it a time ago, doesnt mean it has been defined and therefore it remains "something new".
An ‘A plus’ discussion. Brian never forgets there are intelligent but non physicists in the audience. Editorial explanation without dumbing down. One wonders if an alien intelligence is playing this on the the equivalent of a human ‘funniest’ compilation. ‘They actually thought... then they play spooky music...’dark matter’.
i saw a video of him on entanglement that is done in a wrong way, matter entangles from north to south as seen in ALTON HARP INTRINSIC RED SHIEFT as well in the video THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR DNA DECODED Alton shows the MACRO mine is MICRO and is DNA,
@@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace His name is Halton Arp, not Alton Harp, and you shouldn't get dragged into the youtube crowd inflating his ideas beyond what is reasonable
@@lancetschirhart7676 THANX a lot LANCE for correcting me I am realy bad in spell but I think now I am better than before started readdyng peoples coments, HALTON ARP is been of so much help to understand better my universe in the video HALTON ARP INTRINSIC RED SHIEFT where at first I wonder or though of ENTANGLEMENT AT ALL SCALES that is a video in you tube and the entanglement is done all around in 4 orbits if not broken light and 8 if light is broken, in the video of HALTON ARP you can see how 2 pairs of quasars are entangled to a galaxie, there are too systems with many pairs of quasars relating to a claster of galaxies that to is ENTANGLEMENT in it found that south side brakes more than north cause south side always opposes more resistanse and are the rocky ones the north side are the gaseous so north is positive and south is negative they are 2 one another in pair cross section. Here I new of the 7steps in wave lenghth that to me is the order of the universe that is like a rainbow araingement that fits the TZOLKIN Mayan Calender as orbits that to me are herts but some times seem like matter and any thing you wat to know in physics might be there.
so i learned this as a kid... - "Every action, has an equal and opposite reaction" but, i never understood this when it comes to gravity... it seems obvious when talking about 2 objects touching each other (electromagnetic force) but, when 2 objects (lets say the same size - 2 basketballs) are attracted to each other at a distance, then, it is gravity acting on them... if they both are moving toward each other, is that really an "opposite" force ? my theory is that since photons can act over large distance, so can gravity... and if all objects (with mass) are attracted to all other objects with mass, then there should also be a repulsive force somewhere ? maybe this is dark energy ?
When accounting for the anomalous orbital velocities of stars in a galaxy it seems some deeper theory of gravity could account for these unexpected orbital velocities just as well as proposing the existence of dark matter. However, orbital velocities of stars in a galaxy are not the only indications we have for the existence of dark matter. Sometimes when galaxies collide, they leave their dark matter behind. We can detect this dark matter via gravitational lensing. I think a purely gravitational explanation, as opposed to the assumed existence of dark matter, would struggle to explain how there can be what appears to be a big clump of invisible matter completely detached from the debris of the collision. I wish the theoretician was asked about this. Seems it would have been an obvious question to ask.
It might be that dark matter raises the "heavyness" of the outer most stars, by filling up those stars with particles, that can use the same space as other particles/atoms in those suns, (being in a different dimension sort of), molecules inside so to be more heavy than we see/think them as, and by being heavier, they keep a boundary so that they cant looose "attachment" to the galaxy. Unless another galaxy closes in on our and upset the applecart ;) (newton's applecart)
@@TropicalCoder Yeah, i heard that too, that it only interacts with gravity. I was thinking maybe in an odd way, those particles that constitute the dark matter might be inversed atoms/and-or molecules, meaning that their particles has either shifted places of electrons and quarks, and that quarks in this configuration, wont be able to send out photons back to us so we can see it, or, what you think, does it sounds concistent as an arguement for why we dont see it?
@@ikaeksen We really know absolutely nothing about Dark Matter, or if it even exists. We can only postulate that such a thing could account for some gravitational phenomenon we have observed. We could just as well speculate that it is fairies congregating in large groups that cause these gravitational phenomena. However, it has not been established that fairies can survive in the vacuum of space, so until that is determined we will have to leave the fairies out of it.
@@TropicalCoder Do you then think my idea of inverted atoms is a terrible postulate, or is fairies maybe a funnier postulate ^^.. An inverted atom might for all i know be an anti particle, but then science have missunderstood what anti particles are. Maybe they anihilate this way if they met; if an anti particle is inverted, and has quarks on the outside, and electrons on the inside of the nucleons, then the electrons on the regular atom will meet quarks on the outside of inverted atoms, and set of a reaction that annihilate both particles. or one just replaces the other, and one of them is gone, neutralized. So maybe when atom and anti atom meet the anti atom moves out of its dimension, and we see the event.
Great video, truly great. I am skeptical about dark anything, not convinced at all, despite the seemingly abundant circumstantial evidence.... But so educational....
The gravity certainly exists, what creates it is unknown. Same with dark energy, the universe is definitely expanding faster over time, we just dont know why. The evidence is far beyond circumstantial.
@@bipolarminddroppings And *I* think you have completely bought into the prime error- just as people were once absolutely convinced that the luminiferous ether HAD to exist. The evidence for it was also once "far beyond circumstantial".
Thanx Dr. Green, as always very good job in the explanations of the matter. I found some interesting numbers that all apply to GRAVITY some way or the other, some times gravity is counted as adding the 8 in the disc. The periodic table as well is counted by adding the 118 places, as well I added the mass of each group: METALS, NOT METALS AN METALOIDS. I did the same in 2 other forms to see later. The numbers could go UP and DOWN so the SMALL and the BIG is no problem. 77.86 is the gravity of THE 8 PLANETS IN THE DISC and if we add the SUNS GRAVITY(274) = 351.86M/S2 THAT IS THE SOLAR SISTEM GRAVITY and 3.1416/351.86 = 112.00025. 112.00025/300000KM/S(LS) = 2678.5654/89.28 = 30.001852. 89.28 is the result of 351.86/31416(is a number very common all over cosmology METRIC based) as the coming exemple: 149.6 millions of Km. for the sun light to reach earth times 210(common number) = 31416(is the PI 10000 times). 31416 is what you get whene you add the three faces with the ones the UNIVERSE WORKS in my first book in Hz that could go UP or DOWN as needed for a system to work: 10920 IS FULL FACE/3141600 = 287.6923/144(# PHI) = 1.9978631. 10416 IS MEDLE FACE/3141600 = 301.6129/3.1416 = 96.006142/ 17126.594(the 118 places of the periodic table mass all added) = 178.39936/89.28 = 1.9982007. 10080 IS LOW FACE/3141600 = 311.66660/77.86 = 4.002911. 22 EAARTH DAYS IS A COMPLITE SUNS CICLE BASED IN BLACK SPOTS that are made in the sun. 22 X 365.25 = 8035.5/10920000 = 1358.9695/3.1416 = 432.57241/144 = 3.003975. 22/10920 = 496.36363/3.1416 = 157.99708/17126.594 = 108.39816/1.618 = 66.995154. 77.86/157.99708 = 2.0292458. 22/31416 = 1428/300000 = 210.08403. 1428/17126.594 = 11.993413. 22/17126.594 = 778.48154/77.86 = 9.9984785. 22/16180 = 735.45454/3141600 = 4271.644/3.1416 = 1359.7033/3.1416 = 432.80599/144 = 3.0058971. 1359.7033/17126.594 = 125.95831/1.618 = 77.848152 - 77.86 = 9.011848. 8035.5/161800= 20.135648/3.1416 = 6.4093608/1.618 = 3.961286. 42 ARE THE PETALS OF THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR THE SAME FOR THE DNA FIGURE DECODED. 42/10920 = 260/300000 = 1153.8461/3.1416 = 367.27976/1.618 = 226.99614/17126.594 = 75.448833/3.1416 = 24.01605 the ours of a day. 42/10416 = 248. 42/31416 =748. 42/17126.594 = 407.77604/300000 = 735.69795 to close to 22/16180 = 735.45454. 11.2 KM/S IS THE EARTH SCAPE VELOCITY. 11.2/300000 = 26785.714/89.28 = 300.01908. 11.2/31416 = 2805/3.1416 = 892.85714/89.28 = 10.00064. 11.2/351.86 = 31.416071/3.1416 = 10.000022. 11.2/10920 = 975. 11.2/10416 = 930. 618KM/S IS THE SUN SCAPE VELOCITY. 618/16180 = 26.181229/1.618 = 16.181229/31416 = 1941.5088/3.1416 = 618. 1941.5088/300000 = 154.519/31416 = 203.3148/3.1416 = 64.716959/1.618 = 39.99812. 618/31416 = 50.834951/3.1416 = 16.181229. 50.834951/300000 = 5901.4515/3.1416 = 1878.4859/1.618 =1160.9925/89.28 = 13.003948. 1.618/618 = 381.95302/300000 = 785.43691/3.1416 = 250.01174. Lets divide the periodic table in 5 parts and add each part: 3629.0307 IS THE MASS FROM # 1 ELEMENT TO THE #56 and 3629.0307/ 1391016(SUN DIAMETER) = 383.30235/3.1416 = 122.00864 and 122 is a neutral number in the flower of life. 2341.288 IS THE MASS FROM #57 TO THE #71/1391016 = 594.19735/3141600 = 5287.1322/3.1416 = 1682.94251/6.472(1.618 X 4)= 260.03432 Practicly is a common denominator of a galactic day. 1682.94251/300000 = 504.88276/6.472 = 78.010315 and 78 is a number of the flower of life. 3415.0973 (#72 to the #88)/1391016 = 407.31372/300000 = 736.533/3141600 = 4265.3893/3.1416 = 1357.7124/3.1416= 432.17226/144 = 3.0011962. 407.31372/400697(ARE THE DIMETERS OF THE 8 PLANETS IN THE DISC ALL ADDED) = 983.75522/1.618 = 608.00693. 4058(#104 TO THE 118)/300000 = 73.928043/16180= 218.861467/1.618 = 135.26666/3.1416 = 43.056614 and 43 is a neutral number in the flower of life. There are thousands of this this numbers and many more if interested check my channel.
1420 mega hertz is a frequency that comes out out of the hidrogen and this one makes some good numbers, check them: 1420/300000 = 211.2676/31416 = 148.7024/17126.594 = 115,17362/109200 = 948.13378/1.618 = 585.99121. remember that the golden ratio(1.618) is a number that is in the galaxies. 1420/31416 = 22.123943/7.23 = 3.0600197. 22.123943/10920 = 493.5829/3.1416 = 157.11194 X 2 = 314,22388. 1420/1092000 = 769.01408/300000 = 390.10989/171265.94 = 439.01973. 1420/104160 = 73.35 - 73.42(IS AN AMGLE INSIDE OUR EAR) = 0.067888. 73.352112/314160= 4282.9032/1.618 = 2647.0353/6.472(ITS THE 1.618 4 TIMES)= 408.99803. 73.352112/17126.594 = 233.48467/1.618 = 144.30449/1.618 = 89.186953 - 89.28 = O.093047. 233.48467 is the gravity of violet in my work/3141600= 13455.273/1.618 = 8315.9907. 233.48467/300000 = 1284.8809/314160 = 244.50515/3.1416 = 77.828218 = 77.86 = 0.031782. 1420/100800 = 70.985915/300000 = 4226.1905/314160 = 74.33645/109200 = 1468.9967. 74.33645 X 12 = 892.0374/89.28 = 9.9914583. 74.33645/31416 = 422.61905/1.618 = 161.43289. 422.61905/171265.4 that is the 118 places mass of the periodic table all added = 405.24898/3.1416 = 128.99445/300000 = 2325.6814/1.618 = 143.73803 - 144 = 0.26197. 1913 had 311 spotless days and is a number to common in astronomy jast look: 3.1416/311 = 98.994143 and numbers around 99 are all over the skies. 311/31416 = 101.01607 X 16 = 1616.2571 - 1618 = 1.7429. 77.86/311 = 3.9943488. 311/109200 = 351.1254 - 351.86 = 0.7346. 311/104160 = 206.99605. 311/100800 = 324.11575/1.618 = 200.31875 that 200 is a number of the flower of life as well common denominator of 20 that is all over. dont aspect the numbers to be rigide or constant as always they always go up and down even light speed to me, I dont think the light speed inside a cell will be at 300000K/S that to me might blow it off much less in an atom. numbers are always repeatable one way or another.
My hypothesis is based on Newton force has a opposite equal force..Equilibrium For time to exist, Everything must wither away. This is Entropy, Heat is a Frequency of Atom (movement) Universes start from Order to Disorder Vice versa from Disorder to Order Energy only change shapes, Cant be created or Destroyed Due to this, Everything has to be Equilibrium.. what is borrowed must go back.. What we are, is conglomerate of Energy and Forces.... Quarks are the forces that are pushing inward, and the opposite of Quarks are Forces that are Pushing outward, Gravity and Anti-gravity... sun and black hole Event Horizon is the point between Gravity and anti-Gravity This side of black hole, atoms gets created and the other side of black hole Atoms getting ripped apart... What we have in this Universe, exist like a mirror in the Antimatter Universe ... what ever energy we borrowing in this Universe is from the opposite Universe, and this is Vice Versa. It's hard to believe, that everything which lives and exist in our Universe has a counterpart.. Because of fundamental law of Universe, IF light exist, Dark must exist, IF sun spout's out energy then black suck's in energy... one side of black hole is positive which is our universe and the other side of the black hole is negative which is the Anti-universe,. therefore ... Time is 0 and constant in the Event Horizon,. Time goes forward in our Universe and Time goes backward in Anti-Universe,. Black hole is a inverted sun,. We know matter and Antimatter exist,. Gravity and Time makes us exist, with out either we won't exist. Because of the fundamental law of universe, If time goes forward, then time must go backward... For existence, there has to be equilibrium... That is why Antimatter Exist, and If it didn't Matter wouldn't have existed... That means anything which is Exist in our universe has a counter part.. positive, negative Equilibrium.. Now If Realty exist then there is a place where Non-Realty Exist.. If individual consciousness exist Therefor Collective consciousness exist.. With Disorder Realty exist and from Order Collective consciousness exist.. Reality ---------------------------------------------------Non Reality.. we are a 3-dimensional beings that with 6-Senses we perceive the Universe and understand. And we should think 3 dimensional. if 3 Dimension exits then 2 dimensional exist, and 1 dimensional must exist as well.. Photon which has no mass, could be 2 or 1 dimensional.. That could be same with all the subatomic particles..
The 'simili' is,... it's like peas in pea-soup. (or Ice in water) - What CERN and the participants are negating is,... that, instead of bombarding atoms to try and find the - ever decreasing - 'fundamental particle',... they should realise in the micro as in the macro of 'SPACE',... in which the 'electron' orbits the 'nucleus' that which they 'seek' is, - this universal fluid - in which everything is both immersed in, and made of,... and which matter and gravity are but the 'effects' of it's combinations. . .
That is because we need to consider the geometry of mass and how it changes shape from spherical to a disc resulting in a 1/r gravitational force equation.
Someone needs to go back and re-mix or modulate the audio to soften certain voices and add more presence to others. The discussion and Brian's orchestration makes all of these fascinating and educational.
Brian Greene is the best physics panel moderator because he's an accomplished physicist. Many times I have seen him gently bring a bickering panel of scientists back to the topic at hand, which is only possible if you understand the topic at hand.
Atheists And God Worshipers Live In Deceit
Truth Is Existence
Truth is All That Truly Exists.
Other Than Truth there is Just The understood Concept of An Absence.
Lies with intent to deceive or not is fantasy. Lies remain in the nonexistent realm.
The Great Designer and Creator, Matter, Knowledge, Energy, Time and Space Has Always Existed.
All Without Beginning or end.
Beginning and End only reveals an absence.
Creation is only the rearrangement of Matter. As Existence and Matter does not evolve from nothing.
Spirit Is The Highest Energy Source.
Gods Are Imaginary Personages Of Worship, Gods are Fantasy!
Gods are not creators. There are Hundreds of Gods that the human has worshipped.
The Great Creator is far more Massive and complex than the God worshipers realize and understand.
The Great Creator is not a being somewhere in space.
The Great Creator is a huge mass of spirits in perfect unity. And with the same care for each another.
Words to the honest and wise: honesty and understanding is the only true belief. Without honesty and understanding we do not know what to believe.
To accept other’s opinion of the truth without proving it to yourself; it is being deceived it is not believing.
We must understand to believe.
Until Next time: Sweet Dreams: Truth will solve all our problems before we create them; and ignore or reject the truth; problems will multiply all by themselves; those problems will need no help.
Have a great and a meaningful life if it is at all possible.
Just whispers, of the Spirit of Reality.
Brian is so GOOD at this! Everytime something is going over my head, Brian steps in and slows it down or makes a summary of the discussion. It’s almost scary how important he is for the event🥺
exactly
Whenever i click a random video about Physics or Space and stuff like that, and i see a stage, chairs, and then Brian Greene i get really excited and happy.
I love these shows and i can't wait to watch all of these, i hope these come more often and go on for way much longer!
Perhaps you should read my opinion I wrote on the other TH-cam dark matter black mass , if your interested in dark matter , my version might make you think , it’s just an opinion but you might think about things differently... Black mass is seeping into our atmosphere already ..
@@salijabitic200 ?????
I love this panel style of explaining theories... If you just watch one person being interviewed, or a documentary of like minded scientists, they often say something like, "This is how we know that is, or is not the case... and that is the way it is".
This way you see the emotion involved in the theories and there are other views and it's all incomplete. Much more informative in an important way.
Personally i huge respect for Dr Erik and his work...hope he can lead us out of the woods with your theories in regards to DM...
Yep. He's way ahead of most. His focus is on the whole rather than the parts. The elephant in the room is Consciousness.
I don't like DM, at least in the way its been conceptualized, and I like alternative views as well as Erik's. But his theory has many problems and is most likely wrong. It's crazy to me how DM as a particle is either totally wrong or of an energy scale that we can never achieve yet no one will quite admit it BC they want more funding. And so the charade continues at the neglect of more important studies where all this funding could be routed. The DM issue Is so complex. They find Galaxy after Galaxy where there isn't any DM at all. But it's also very conceivable that it+' mass is too large for us to recreate. I think our understanding of gravity at large scales is incomplete..
I sure brought a different point of view didn't I? No one spoke of these ideas before me! N
What I love about science... notice, people with a different point a view and they are not yelling or trying to shoot each other... This is so much better then "other" discussions such as politics and religion...
Thanks Dr. Green and others for putting this great discussion.
I never formally studied physics after 10th standard however, I've been following the theories and concepts continuously for last 3 years online and trying to train myself whatever a little I can. (I first got interested after I read A Brief History of Time) I want to know as the physics unfolds itself upon us in my lifetime.
🤗👍
Great video, but now i already officially watched all of the physics videos on TH-cam! Lol! Thanks for keeping me up to date!
seriously only then....i started a long time ago mate
@@bobbone8029 fffffb u😊b😊 buuut i😊jnb
I was born with many difficulties in my life. Although I am not fully educated, I have a strong love for science and the universe. Thank you for bringing it to me. Love you
The moment I heard Verlinde explain his ideas, I got this feeling he is on the right path
It sounds pretty logical to me when he says that it doesn't feel right to use a constant to describe 70% of the universe, when we have done so much analysis on the 5%.
They always seem to put the guy with the most juice in the chair farthest from Brian. That way when he or she speaks, everyone else is between them and Brian. I don't think it's a coincidence- so the seating assignment is a clue as to who is batting clean-up.
Great talk! Many thanks! Inspiration from this talk... Hyphothesis E: If Spirits exit, thus Spiritual Realms (where Supernatural Beings live) also exit. Thus, by proving higher dimensional hyperspace exits via String Theory (and dark matter/dark universe, possible evidence could be detected using collision of higher dimensional frequencies), human beings can then deduce/induce that "we are not alone in this universe/multiverses".
All ears 👂
I have watched every video that WSF has put out. Love it. Thank you.
Me too. They are really brilliant videos.
Then solve dark matter
Gudd for yaa
It's addiction!!
It’s just beautiful listening to this beautiful minds
It gives me a sense of grandiosity
Knowing that I am part of this immense riddle
No good four liar my dear. I know you try you’re best you’re branes but no good four liar
Brian Greene will always be one of my favorite minds
His teaching & facilitating style certainly scaffolds to help explain quantum & physics understandably.
If you can remain in the middle then we know total peace, all-knowingness, and the epitome of simplicity. Always was is now and will never end. Great Stuff, Thank you
Been binge watching these videos while in lock down. Fascinating stuff.
I talk a long walk yesterday with the dog thinking about whether dark matter is a invisible vibration for a world for spirits 🤔
I started binging physics lectures a few years ago, I work construction and listen while I work, I’m not an expert by any means but I did have an basic understanding of relativity and the standard model before I started but I can’t tell you how incredibly awesome this stuff gets, keep on binging man, you won’t regret it.
The analogy at the beginning is incredible!
Really excellent moderation allowed an equal taste of all these different theories trying to account for one of the greatest mysteries of our times. As an aside, perhaps one day these brilliant minds will come up with an explanation of where socks go when we put them in the dryer. We know there is a basic symmetry to socks - they always come in pairs. Yet when they come out of the dryer there is always an odd one, breaking the symmetry. Energy must be involved in breaking the covalent bond between the pairs of socks, and we know the heat in the dryer must play a part. This also has implications involving information theory and entropy. Perhaps the answer lies somewhere at the intersection of supersymmetry and string theory.
This has been tested. If you put them in the dryer all together in one mesh laundry bag they found you never lose any! Also if you were to check the grommet around the dryer and even sometimes the washer you may a couple. But they never truly disappear just collect in a tough to find spot or you never actually put them in but thought you did.
Ok the reality with socks is your miss• organization of your dirty clothes is causing the line sock. Put that to youryheory
Most interesting view, your guests were diplomatic and informative. They defended their position but also allowed for the possibility of being wrong. Very smart. Personally, I gained insight into what my thoughts could be. I am a layperson, I know no formulas except that I exist in this beautiful world that we should protect and get to know in a more personal way. Thank you Dr. Greene
Extremly good channel. Thank you so much for sharing this! Best regards from Vienna!
4552
Drága szerelmem, David! Sosem lehetek elég hálás, hogy szeretsz. Örökké szeretni foglak míg élek, huseggel. Szeretlek.
This is how real scientists debate real theories. Also, good to see Brian, leading the debate too. Top notch.
Not so easy for nonsapiens, so please consider this...
Spacial distortion bending the path of light, also distorts the frequency of light emitted from super heavy distant galaxies.
Gravity from distant galaxies has a redshift effect on the frequency of light they emit in the same way that gravity can bend the path of light from a light source behind the gravitational field.
Dark energy is an illusion caused by a spacial distortion caused by the gravitational fields of the distant galaxies emitting the light.
Hence no cosmic acceleration, no dark energy causing acceleration, no unaccounted for dark matter, and certainly, no big bang. This universe is eternal, without beginning or ending. Cosmic background microwaves are but distant galaxies who's light has been gravitationally distorted beyond your visible spectrum.
Galaxies continually exchange and recycle energy and birth new stars out of old dead ones for ever and ever.
How do you think light escapes super heavy distant galaxies with its frequency visually unaffected by spacial distortions?
Someday sapien's evolutionary decendents might survive travel to distant galaxies and discover the return trip doesn't take require extra travel time, as no acceleration is actually occuring.
@@unitedspacepirates9075 Wow. Someone should put _you_ in charge...
Incredibly enlightening discussion involving researchers at the bleeding edge. Fascinating. World science festival has quickly become my favourite channel. Thank you all of you who are involved in this work.
A very sophisticated and respectful discussion. Thank you very much for that.
Especially since Neil deGrasse wasn't sitting there. Mr. "Dark Matter isn't Matter". There is only matter and and energy in this universe.
@@stevelenores5637 _And?_
@@craigwall9536 I didn't know a conjunction was a question. I guess my grammar book is out of date. Perhaps 'and?' replaces the eternal 'why?' of a young child.
My statement is complete. Your inability to comprehend it is your problem.
@@stevelenores5637 AND means you've got _nothing._ You obviously can't extend your comment to anything meaningful. Which is pretty damned _lame,_ since it's obvious that "Dark Matter" is a repeat of "Luminiferous Ether", meaning they've gone down the wrong "common sense" path and got their heads into a funnel. Gamow et al figured this out in the 1950's and pointed out that the galactic milieu is _viscous;_ since then the viscosity has been attributed to Baryonic Virtual Quantum interactions. There ain't no "missing matter", dark or otherwise. They've simply mistaken viscosity for gravity.
@@craigwall9536 It means no such thing. What you are telling me is I'm not allowed to have my own observations. I'm not allowed to see what I saw and heard, and then imply my understanding of what was missing. "AND" is simply rude and dismissive. Appealing to authority will not bail you out. What I said was accurate. Prove Neil deGrasse didn't make the claim I stated at first. I made no comment on Gamow. You are simply deflecting.
I can listen to this kind of discussion all-day long
I cant get enough of this stuff.
me nither
So basically "this stuff" is "dark matter" for you..
You can't get enough of this stuff, while, scientists can't get enough of dark matter
Beautifully put together ,well explained and buoyant throughout. Lovely presentation.
Glad i found this channel. New subscriber! Love these kinds of talks. Also Brian Greene is a great host.
The universe is mostly dark. But we are in the time when we can see the light before it’s too late now,❤
Don't just give thanks to the great story teller, Brian Greene, but to the real people that play a role in his story... ❤❤❤
Yeah, but Greene is a physicist himself at Columbia , so he too has played a major role in string theory
New to this. Stunning that the earth, planets and stars are held in fixed positions, floating about in this dark stuff that no one can figure out. Amazing.
World science festival is a great platform to understand a lot of things about science. I think Dr Green is one finest speakers and he explains everything in simple language so those who didn't have much exposure in science can understand the principles and core idea of discussion very well. Thank you for having such a website and discussion. It will attract more people to learn science and start thinking logically about the universe.
This moderator is the best moderator in any field I have ever seen. Well done!
Thank you for the full version. I like both, the clips and the full version.
Where's the clips?
nothing could be more explicit!! thank you WSF! :-)
Brian has to do more of this we love you.
WSF presents wonderful discussions and are addictive too. I end up wanting to watch one after the other. I presently constrain myself to just one a day, like a vitamin.
*It seems to me that, detecting dark-matter would be similar to, actors in a movie detecting the cinema screen they’re being projected onto*
@Stevo Devo Good try but, you know I mean from within the film.
that's a good way to put it! logically, the actors know the cinema screen will be somewhere, eventually. but there's no way for them to know or see where or when that will be, same as us trying to find 'dark' matter and energy
i always love to see when women are on the panel as a young woman its very inspiring. love how inclusive these always are!! thanks Brian
Another excellent discussion! thank you Brian 👏
Bhadra zboe
Okay, no one leaves the auditorium until we get
that missing matter back. Everyone, empty your pockets.
"Get Smart" on dark matter, "We missed it by that much."
Great discussion, thanks for sharing.
I seriously love everything about Brian Greene!!
He's got a great voice
All of his books are fantastic. I regularly re-read them.
I love his undershirt
I’ve never heard anybody talking about what if there were lots of big bangs, and they are like bubbles in a bubble bath. Wouldn’t they pull on each other and cause this kind of acceleration? We can’t see our entire universe (our local big bang , so we wouldn’t be able to see any of the others. They could have happened all at once, for anybody knows.
I think Max-Tegmark and / or Sean Carroll.
Great panel and great discussion!
I see Brian Greene and immediately give a thumbs up 👍
8k88k9k888k9.8k8.
Brian Greene is the best!
It is fair to say that coordinating these mighty brains in a panel discussion is not an easy task.
Thank you for the mention of Vera Rubin. :)
I read her Wikipedia article as a result of her mention in this program. It sounds like she was done out of the Nobel prize and this is the view of a number of her contemporaries and subsequent members of related disciplines to Cosmology. She had four children as well and did much work from home. A true trailblazer of women's equality.
Such a marvelous presenter and coordinator is Dr. Greene
Thank you for doing this Dr. Greene
Start focussing on the fact that time could have mass. This will lead us to what dark matter is as well as give us a clearer indication as to what gravity actually is and how we should treat time fields around objects of matter/mass. Time, Mass and the Higgs Boson are inextricably linked to Gravity and each other but it is not in the way most physicist are thinking. Dark energy is going to be a shocker of some kind because it looks like it may play into the Einsteins General Relativity and the tweak needed to his equation.
Great presentation, thank you!
and no new physics is actually needed. It is already all there, we just need to re-arrange a few things and make a couple of small tweaks...and yes, I am proposing that the HB is the fundamental particle of time, if time does indeed have mass.
Brian, great work in moderating the discussion! 👍
I thought Brian was the only respectable theoretical physicist left out there. Everyone else is afraid of I don't know and just vomits whatever pays the most all over the stage.
An excellent talk! It's nice to hear about a few new thoughts on the matter (no pun intended.)
My friend you are in a place on youtube where people understand you even if you don't point out your joke you know... hehe
This is probably the best video of WSF, loved it ❤️
Great talk, really enjoyed that. And, I think very well moderated by BG, who kept everything going and interesting. I think Erik Verlinde is a man to take notice of.
I was a little puzzled that the intro notes made no reference to the fact that this talk was filmed on the anniversary of the solar eclipse of 29th May, 1919, as observed by Sir Arthur Eddington and colleague, which was very significant, because it was the first observational proof of the validity of Einstein’s theory of GR.
Brian Greene did allude to this in his opening introduction, but some people may have wondered what he was referring to, and when this talk was filmed.
he did mention the eclipse in this video.
richie1326 thanks
Thank you, Dr. Brian Greene👍
These people need to actually read Erik's papers, which are great and actually reproduce general relativity - with corrections that add the extra gravity that is ascribed to dark matter.
I recently read an interesting article--In 1920, lecturing at the University of Leiden, on the topic "Ether and the Theory of Relativity," Einstein stated outright that the ether did exist, that it was necessary as a medium of transfer because light also had wave-like properties. He even wrote Lorentz to clarify this point. But by now, the damage had been done. This lecture received little notice, it was ignored in Roland Clark's watershed biography on Einstein published in 1971, and so the 20th and early 21st centuries evolved in such a way to dismiss entirely ether theory.
That was interesting discussion, thanks Greene and all. There's very good material in net and youtube today. Been watching these vids and studying some physics recently. Couldn't fit all sort of topics which interested me into my degree when I was in university; so now I'm filling those bkind spots.
Thank you, one and all. Revisiting this topic on the birth of the James Webb Space Telescope. Thinking at least two of the four presenters will have time to collect data for their theory there.
water tension and gravity tension sounds good and may work the same way the two also make waves
One of the better WSF talks. thank you.
Thank you Brian Green! There are no words apt for describing how important the dissemination of the WSF is for us, the lay people of the planet. In the past, even with years and years of education, one would not have access to this information, nor the plethora of subjects addressed by the WSF. My biggest hope is that more and more people get interested in science, biology, mathematics, astrophysics etc., and that this serves as a catalyst for a neo civilized population who can determine for themselves wether information is credible or not, and make decisions based on evidence and logic, while optimising outcomes in a secular and humanist framework. You are a great man, and your pioneering vision will outlive you and your grandkids. Really bro, thank you.
Hello anybody anybody else
literally!!
i love that they got bernie sanders to join in the discussion
He is a zionist.
rofl
Hahaha glad I'm not the only one who tought that.
Gracias... to see and re-see alway finding knolege.... your work Brian is very important to me and many persons to know more...
Thanks for your efforts. Is it possible that the texture of space and time is the same as the Dark Matter or at least a function of it?
Gravity keeps me on the ground and it's not a particle. These "super" smart scientist think dark matter that keeps the universe together is a particle...
I've spent so much time today listening to the impeachment inquiry and testimony, I would much rather use my time on this!
William Peterson Perhaps so... but the concept of there being a _single_ external objective reality that we all share _ought_ to be a fundamental underlying principle of _all_ facets of life, not just science. and now even science has become corrupted by the intrusion of politics in areas such as Anthropogenic Global Warming Denialism. It is important to show the concept of objective reality being applied successfully in scientific research, and the same concept ought to be applied in politics, journalism, the rule of law, and in the study of history, for example. This should be part of our standard education system.
The recent trend toward relativism, obfuscation, conspiracy theories, and outright serial lying poses an existential threat to the stability of our society. This danger should be apparent to _everyone_ not just those who seem superficially to benefit from it in the short-term. Science can serve as an example that multiple realities, if they exist at all, may only be relevant at Quantum scale, and should not be invoked in a cynical political strategy intended to promote confusion and divergence of "worldviews" within our culture.
MendTheWorld Hmm.....Trillions Of visible, invisible layers of stuff? With trillions of trillions of Connectivity? There is no difference between any layer of stuff! And-Just paid experts? Giving an opinion, of where the Tree is rooted. By the roots in the ground or rooted by the branches in the invisible ether! There is something quite dramatic that being in the rut of a percentage of 5% Known, drawing conclusions about the 100% Unknown unknowables Which seems archaic! The impeachment inquiry and Dark Stuff are the same thing, it is Incomplete Understanding Of Anything.....So it does not matter what you watch, it is watching You anyway, by hook or by crook!
Impeachment still going on today :(
C Apt Hmm...Impeachment ..A USA style of Brexit....But going on in USA Continent? Disney will bring out a movie of it and Make Billions Of $$$$s
Combine:
1. cosmological constant
2. schrodinger solution
3. Planck E= h f= h n
4. n = number of superpositions
And you get dark matter
n^2 h^2 / ( 8 m L^2) = h n
m = 0.3313 10^18 10^-34 = 0.3313 10^-16 kg ( all superpositions).
1 particle = 0.331 10^-16 / ( 0.4 10^18) = 0.828 10^-34 kg = 46 eV
If you count only the positive wave function amplitudes: n = 10^9
then dark matter = WIMP
m = 46 GeV
What makes us think that we could possibly see every little thing out in an infinite universe to claim there may be dark matter or dark energy. I just think there's way to many other planets, blackhokes, stars etc that we haven't seen or found yet. That would make more sense then just guessing up a new force.
that doesn't work, there's so much dark matter that we would've seen them if it were just other celestial bodies.
Loved this one! Thank-You to all involved!
It's kind of amazing that the further away one looks, the further back in time they can see. The past is flinging itself at us at the speed of light.
Crazy isn't it?! So it means we don't actually know what the galaxy/universe looks like right now for all we know there could have been a huge universal catastrophe and the majority of the universe as exploded but we have no idea because none of the light, matter or material has reached us yet 😂
I wish our government could be as open minded and mature.
This is one of the better panel discussions. Normally I prefer individual lectures. Sean Carroll, Carolin Crawford, Feryal Ozel, Neil Turok, David Kaplan...
Mariangela has a cold. Joe wants to defend his turf but Erik is rolling right over him. Risa is a mechanic with busy-work to do. Brian is making it all look easy but he'd much rather just talk to Erik.
Damn those three got schooled by the dutchman. His theory seems much more plausible than looking for "dark stuff"
I agree. I also happen to suspect that modern cosmologists have neglected the earlier discussions of viscosity when finding the galactic rotation acts like a nearly solid disk. George Gamow was pointing this out back in the 30's. I guess they don't appreciate the difference between gases and particulates.
I hope we don't figure out dark matter, they would just mess it up
32:22 nice anime ears!
The whole panel was excellent but @1:08 where Eric shows the graph and says "the critical value [where the expected vs observed rotation rates diverge] is connected to the expansion rate of the universe" --- now THAT really got my attention.
Yes. And I think I may know why.
Home boi BG laying the smackdown on what we don't know about the things we do know
If Dr Pierre Robitaille is not on the panel for discussion regarding CMB, then the forum is a complete waste of time.
May 29, 1919 was the date of the eclipse.
Analysis of the data and henceforth confirmation took a while
Exactly. "The eclipse that made Einstein famous"....
Dark lives matter too.
The Eclipse does not show that Space is curved!!!
The motion of Light is Geodesic in Nature, which means that the motion of Light in Space-Time is curved.
There are no straight lines in Space-Time. A straight line between two points is curved, is called a minor arch, according to Einstein.
@@92587wayne Doesn't have to, it's a confirmation of the general theory of relativity. Calculation of star position more consistent with Einsteins formula, then with Newton's formulas. Did you know there was a calculation for the star positions based on Newton? There was a small error with Einstein's work too but error was within limits of the instruments they were using at the time.
My last comment about a standard model of space is influenced by the hypothesis some physicists have that first there is Inflation and then there is the Big Bang. That hypothesis implies empty space expanding then time, matter and energy emerging. If that hypothesis is true then it's more important to focus on space than on matter.
👍🏻 for the panelists
Should retitle this video:
Searching for ANY evidence that dark matter or energy even exists so we dont look like idiots.
Well we observe the effects, and so far there's no better other explanation
@@XraynPR we observe galaxies behaving and moving in ways that we dont understand and that we believe shouldnt be happening according to our understanding and since that behaviour and movement, according to our understanding, should be dictated by gravity we simply had to apply to this phenomena the only thing we could think of to inject into the equation that we assume affects gravity- mass.
What has mass? Matter.
Since we cant see, or detect the unseen matter, they just added the comic book element to it by calling it dark. Brilliant.
@@thetroof5525 we couldn't see some planets like Neptune a while back, yet knew it was there.
It's a bit more complicated. It's either Dark Matter or something entirely new, which is more unlikely. Even stuff like MOND seems insufficient.
@@XraynPR dark matter is "something new". It's the textbook definition of "something new".
We have no idea what it is.
Just because they postulated it a time ago, doesnt mean it has been defined and therefore it remains "something new".
In probably 10-20 years younger than her but I just fell in love with Maria Angela. Intelligence can truly be beautiful.
An ‘A plus’ discussion. Brian never forgets there are intelligent but non physicists in the audience. Editorial explanation without dumbing down.
One wonders if an alien intelligence is playing this on the the equivalent of a human ‘funniest’ compilation. ‘They actually thought... then they play spooky music...’dark matter’.
I'm sure aliens have already harnessed and mastered dark energy --- they find it amusing that us hairless apes are still spooked by dark matter
I cant wait until i have the spare time to learn everything to be a physicist, and then try my hand at theoretical physics.
Truly learn maths
@@dinaray2025 im a graphics software engineer. I hear its kinda popular among some physicists as a way to apply their math knowledge.
@Vendicar Kahn studying other math heavy fields in computer science.
Excellent. Good job all.
Was hoping for Leonard Susskind to be up there
it's more likely to get Leonard Nimoy
@@phoule76 lol
i saw a video of him on entanglement that is done in a wrong way, matter entangles from north to south as seen in ALTON HARP INTRINSIC RED SHIEFT as well in the video THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR DNA DECODED Alton shows the MACRO mine is MICRO and is DNA,
@@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace His name is Halton Arp, not Alton Harp, and you shouldn't get dragged into the youtube crowd inflating his ideas beyond what is reasonable
@@lancetschirhart7676 THANX a lot LANCE for correcting me I am realy bad in spell but I think now I am better than before started readdyng peoples coments, HALTON ARP is been of so much help to understand better my universe in the video HALTON ARP INTRINSIC RED SHIEFT where at first I wonder or though of ENTANGLEMENT AT ALL SCALES that is a video in you tube and the entanglement is done all around in 4 orbits if not broken light and 8 if light is broken, in the video of HALTON ARP you can see how 2 pairs of quasars are entangled to a galaxie, there are too systems with many pairs of quasars relating to a claster of galaxies that to is ENTANGLEMENT in it found that south side brakes more than north cause south side always opposes more resistanse and are the rocky ones the north side are the gaseous so north is positive and south is negative they are 2 one another in pair cross section. Here I new of the 7steps in wave lenghth that to me is the order of the universe that is like a rainbow araingement that fits the TZOLKIN Mayan Calender as orbits that to me are herts but some times seem like matter and any thing you wat to know in physics might be there.
so i learned this as a kid...
- "Every action, has an equal and opposite reaction"
but, i never understood this when it comes to gravity...
it seems obvious when talking about 2 objects touching each other (electromagnetic force)
but, when 2 objects (lets say the same size - 2 basketballs) are attracted to each other at a distance,
then, it is gravity acting on them...
if they both are moving toward each other, is that really an "opposite" force ?
my theory is that since photons can act over large distance, so can gravity...
and if all objects (with mass) are attracted to all other objects with mass,
then there should also be a repulsive force somewhere ?
maybe this is dark energy ?
Love with a lil uncertainty now but earlier today just love
When accounting for the anomalous orbital velocities of stars in a galaxy it seems some deeper theory of gravity could account for these unexpected orbital velocities just as well as proposing the existence of dark matter. However, orbital velocities of stars in a galaxy are not the only indications we have for the existence of dark matter. Sometimes when galaxies collide, they leave their dark matter behind. We can detect this dark matter via gravitational lensing. I think a purely gravitational explanation, as opposed to the assumed existence of dark matter, would struggle to explain how there can be what appears to be a big clump of invisible matter completely detached from the debris of the collision. I wish the theoretician was asked about this. Seems it would have been an obvious question to ask.
It might be that dark matter raises the "heavyness" of the outer most stars, by filling up those stars with particles, that can use the same space as other particles/atoms in those suns, (being in a different dimension sort of), molecules inside so to be more heavy than we see/think them as, and by being heavier, they keep a boundary so that they cant looose "attachment" to the galaxy. Unless another galaxy closes in on our and upset the applecart ;) (newton's applecart)
@@ikaeksen I like your notion that perhaps dark matter inhabits another dimension. That would explain why it only seems to interact via gravity.
@@TropicalCoder Yeah, i heard that too, that it only interacts with gravity. I was thinking maybe in an odd way, those particles that constitute the dark matter might be inversed atoms/and-or molecules, meaning that their particles has either shifted places of electrons and quarks, and that quarks in this configuration, wont be able to send out photons back to us so we can see it, or, what you think, does it sounds concistent as an arguement for why we dont see it?
@@ikaeksen We really know absolutely nothing about Dark Matter, or if it even exists. We can only postulate that such a thing could account for some gravitational phenomenon we have observed. We could just as well speculate that it is fairies congregating in large groups that cause these gravitational phenomena. However, it has not been established that fairies can survive in the vacuum of space, so until that is determined we will have to leave the fairies out of it.
@@TropicalCoder Do you then think my idea of inverted atoms is a terrible postulate, or is fairies maybe a funnier postulate ^^.. An inverted atom might for all i know be an anti particle, but then science have missunderstood what anti particles are. Maybe they anihilate this way if they met; if an anti particle is inverted, and has quarks on the outside, and electrons on the inside of the nucleons, then the electrons on the regular atom will meet quarks on the outside of inverted atoms, and set of a reaction that annihilate both particles. or one just replaces the other, and one of them is gone, neutralized. So maybe when atom and anti atom meet the anti atom moves out of its dimension, and we see the event.
Superb!
Every speaker was focussed and made clear points in a concise way.
Most unusual.
-Even at this level, there's usually one that gets away! 👻
Brian Greene!!! 🙌
Great video, truly great. I am skeptical about dark anything, not convinced at all, despite the seemingly abundant circumstantial evidence.... But so educational....
The gravity certainly exists, what creates it is unknown. Same with dark energy, the universe is definitely expanding faster over time, we just dont know why.
The evidence is far beyond circumstantial.
@@bipolarminddroppings And *I* think you have completely bought into the prime error- just as people were once absolutely convinced that the luminiferous ether HAD to exist. The evidence for it was also once "far beyond circumstantial".
Thanx Dr. Green, as always very good job in the explanations of the matter.
I found some interesting numbers that all apply to GRAVITY some way or the other, some times gravity is counted as adding the 8 in the disc. The periodic table as well is counted by adding the 118 places, as well I added the mass of each group: METALS, NOT METALS AN METALOIDS. I did the same in 2 other forms to see later.
The numbers could go UP and DOWN so the SMALL and the BIG is no problem.
77.86 is the gravity of THE 8 PLANETS IN THE DISC and if we add the SUNS GRAVITY(274) =
351.86M/S2 THAT IS THE SOLAR SISTEM GRAVITY and 3.1416/351.86 = 112.00025.
112.00025/300000KM/S(LS) = 2678.5654/89.28 = 30.001852.
89.28 is the result of 351.86/31416(is a number very common all over cosmology METRIC based) as the coming exemple:
149.6 millions of Km. for the sun light to reach earth times 210(common number) = 31416(is the PI 10000 times).
31416 is what you get whene you add the three faces with the ones the UNIVERSE WORKS in my first book in Hz that could go UP or DOWN as needed for a system to work:
10920 IS FULL FACE/3141600 = 287.6923/144(# PHI) = 1.9978631.
10416 IS MEDLE FACE/3141600 = 301.6129/3.1416 = 96.006142/
17126.594(the 118 places of the periodic table mass all added) = 178.39936/89.28 = 1.9982007.
10080 IS LOW FACE/3141600 = 311.66660/77.86 = 4.002911.
22 EAARTH DAYS IS A COMPLITE SUNS CICLE BASED IN BLACK SPOTS that are made in the sun.
22 X 365.25 = 8035.5/10920000 = 1358.9695/3.1416 = 432.57241/144 = 3.003975.
22/10920 = 496.36363/3.1416 = 157.99708/17126.594 = 108.39816/1.618 = 66.995154.
77.86/157.99708 = 2.0292458.
22/31416 = 1428/300000 = 210.08403.
1428/17126.594 = 11.993413.
22/17126.594 = 778.48154/77.86 = 9.9984785.
22/16180 = 735.45454/3141600 = 4271.644/3.1416 = 1359.7033/3.1416 = 432.80599/144 = 3.0058971.
1359.7033/17126.594 = 125.95831/1.618 = 77.848152 - 77.86 = 9.011848.
8035.5/161800= 20.135648/3.1416 = 6.4093608/1.618 = 3.961286.
42 ARE THE PETALS OF THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR THE SAME FOR THE DNA FIGURE DECODED.
42/10920 = 260/300000 = 1153.8461/3.1416 = 367.27976/1.618 = 226.99614/17126.594 = 75.448833/3.1416 = 24.01605 the ours of a day.
42/10416 = 248.
42/31416 =748.
42/17126.594 = 407.77604/300000 = 735.69795 to close to 22/16180 = 735.45454.
11.2 KM/S IS THE EARTH SCAPE VELOCITY.
11.2/300000 = 26785.714/89.28 = 300.01908.
11.2/31416 = 2805/3.1416 = 892.85714/89.28 = 10.00064.
11.2/351.86 = 31.416071/3.1416 = 10.000022.
11.2/10920 = 975.
11.2/10416 = 930.
618KM/S IS THE SUN SCAPE VELOCITY.
618/16180 = 26.181229/1.618 = 16.181229/31416 = 1941.5088/3.1416 = 618.
1941.5088/300000 = 154.519/31416 = 203.3148/3.1416 = 64.716959/1.618 = 39.99812.
618/31416 = 50.834951/3.1416 = 16.181229.
50.834951/300000 = 5901.4515/3.1416 = 1878.4859/1.618 =1160.9925/89.28 = 13.003948.
1.618/618 = 381.95302/300000 = 785.43691/3.1416 = 250.01174.
Lets divide the periodic table in 5 parts and add each part:
3629.0307 IS THE MASS FROM # 1 ELEMENT TO THE #56 and 3629.0307/
1391016(SUN DIAMETER) = 383.30235/3.1416 = 122.00864 and 122 is a neutral number in the flower of life.
2341.288 IS THE MASS FROM #57 TO THE #71/1391016 = 594.19735/3141600 = 5287.1322/3.1416 = 1682.94251/6.472(1.618 X 4)= 260.03432 Practicly is a common denominator of a galactic day.
1682.94251/300000 = 504.88276/6.472 = 78.010315 and 78 is a number of the flower of life.
3415.0973 (#72 to the #88)/1391016 = 407.31372/300000 = 736.533/3141600 = 4265.3893/3.1416 = 1357.7124/3.1416= 432.17226/144 = 3.0011962.
407.31372/400697(ARE THE DIMETERS OF THE 8 PLANETS IN THE DISC ALL ADDED) = 983.75522/1.618 = 608.00693.
4058(#104 TO THE 118)/300000 = 73.928043/16180= 218.861467/1.618 = 135.26666/3.1416 = 43.056614 and 43 is a neutral number in the flower of life.
There are thousands of this this numbers and many more if interested check my channel.
1420 mega hertz is a frequency that comes out out of the hidrogen and this one makes some good numbers, check them:
1420/300000 = 211.2676/31416 = 148.7024/17126.594 = 115,17362/109200 = 948.13378/1.618 = 585.99121. remember that the golden ratio(1.618) is a number that is in the galaxies.
1420/31416 = 22.123943/7.23 = 3.0600197.
22.123943/10920 = 493.5829/3.1416 = 157.11194 X 2 = 314,22388.
1420/1092000 = 769.01408/300000 = 390.10989/171265.94 = 439.01973.
1420/104160 = 73.35 - 73.42(IS AN AMGLE INSIDE OUR EAR) = 0.067888.
73.352112/314160= 4282.9032/1.618 = 2647.0353/6.472(ITS THE 1.618 4 TIMES)= 408.99803.
73.352112/17126.594 = 233.48467/1.618 = 144.30449/1.618 = 89.186953 - 89.28 = O.093047.
233.48467 is the gravity of violet in my work/3141600= 13455.273/1.618 = 8315.9907.
233.48467/300000 = 1284.8809/314160 = 244.50515/3.1416 = 77.828218 = 77.86 = 0.031782.
1420/100800 = 70.985915/300000 = 4226.1905/314160 = 74.33645/109200 = 1468.9967.
74.33645 X 12 = 892.0374/89.28 = 9.9914583.
74.33645/31416 = 422.61905/1.618 = 161.43289.
422.61905/171265.4 that is the 118 places mass of the periodic table all added = 405.24898/3.1416 = 128.99445/300000 = 2325.6814/1.618 = 143.73803 - 144 = 0.26197.
1913 had 311 spotless days and is a number to common in astronomy jast look:
3.1416/311 = 98.994143 and numbers around 99 are all over the skies.
311/31416 = 101.01607 X 16 = 1616.2571 - 1618 = 1.7429.
77.86/311 = 3.9943488.
311/109200 = 351.1254 - 351.86 = 0.7346.
311/104160 = 206.99605.
311/100800 = 324.11575/1.618 = 200.31875 that 200 is a number of the flower of life as well common denominator of 20 that is all over. dont aspect the numbers to be rigide or constant as always they always go up and down even light speed to me, I dont think the light speed inside a cell will be at 300000K/S that to me might blow it off much less in an atom.
numbers are always repeatable one way or another.
My hypothesis is based on Newton force has a opposite equal force..Equilibrium
For time to exist, Everything must wither away.
This is Entropy,
Heat is a Frequency of Atom (movement)
Universes start from Order to Disorder
Vice versa from Disorder to Order
Energy only change shapes, Cant be created or Destroyed
Due to this, Everything has to be Equilibrium..
what is borrowed must go back..
What we are, is conglomerate of Energy and Forces....
Quarks are the forces that are pushing inward, and the opposite of Quarks are Forces that are Pushing outward, Gravity and Anti-gravity...
sun and black hole
Event Horizon is the point between Gravity and anti-Gravity
This side of black hole, atoms gets created and the other side of black hole Atoms getting ripped apart...
What we have in this Universe, exist like a mirror in the Antimatter Universe ...
what ever energy we borrowing in this Universe is from the opposite Universe, and this is Vice Versa.
It's hard to believe, that everything which lives and exist in our Universe has a counterpart..
Because of fundamental law of Universe, IF light exist, Dark must exist, IF sun spout's out energy then black suck's in energy...
one side of black hole is positive which is our universe and the other side of the black hole is negative which is the Anti-universe,. therefore ...
Time is 0 and constant in the Event Horizon,.
Time goes forward in our Universe and Time goes backward in Anti-Universe,.
Black hole is a inverted sun,.
We know matter and Antimatter exist,.
Gravity and Time makes us exist, with out either we won't exist.
Because of the fundamental law of universe, If time goes forward, then time must go backward...
For existence, there has to be equilibrium...
That is why Antimatter Exist, and If it didn't Matter wouldn't have existed...
That means anything which is Exist in our universe has a counter part..
positive, negative
Equilibrium..
Now If Realty exist then there is a place where Non-Realty Exist..
If individual consciousness exist Therefor Collective consciousness exist..
With Disorder Realty exist and from Order Collective consciousness exist..
Reality ---------------------------------------------------Non Reality..
we are a 3-dimensional beings that with 6-Senses we perceive the Universe and understand.
And we should think 3 dimensional.
if 3 Dimension exits then 2 dimensional exist, and 1 dimensional must exist as well..
Photon which has no mass, could be 2 or 1 dimensional..
That could be same with all the subatomic particles..
Summary: "We still haven't found shit."
The 'simili' is,... it's like peas in pea-soup. (or Ice in water)
- What CERN and the participants are negating is,... that, instead of bombarding atoms to try and find the - ever decreasing - 'fundamental particle',... they should realise in the micro as in the macro of 'SPACE',... in which the 'electron' orbits the 'nucleus' that which they 'seek' is, - this universal fluid - in which everything is both immersed in, and made of,... and which matter and gravity are but the 'effects' of it's combinations.
.
.
That is because we need to consider the geometry of mass and how it changes shape from spherical to a disc resulting in a 1/r gravitational force equation.
Particle physics gives us the meaning of Anti-People, for every person there is a proto-person and an anti-person.
Man! You said it! Hahaha
Excellent understanding of ERICK IDEAS 🤣🤣🤣😀
Someone needs to go back and re-mix or modulate the audio to soften certain voices and add more presence to others.
The discussion and Brian's orchestration makes all of these fascinating and educational.