@melindatanner5853 lib lab uniparty destroyed Australia's manufacturing so we have no choice but to use non recyclable products. Nats destroyed Australia's farming families, sad
Not their only blindness. And they probably have hairy palms too. They're Neo Marxists who don't understand or respect very basic democratic principles.
The Greens and the Teals are a mass of contradictions. On the one hand they claim to be terribly concerned about the environment. Yet, on the other hand, they won't have a bar of cutting Australia"s rapid, excessive and utterly irresponsible population growth which is the biggest single cause of environmental damage.
Very well said Sir, I think this attitude of stopping development applies to most industries in Australia. We have had so much at our fingertips over the years and now it's gone, just like the greens need to be gone. Australia must come first for our own employment. Australia has fell so far behind those in positions of power think we are in front. The catch phrase or Australian conditions or ADR's have killed off a lot of industries and business, in my opinion. Needs to change.
I never yet met a politician who had any common sense, although they do have big bank accounts and own lots of rental houses. People tell me that I should go into politics, but I would rather be an honest billionaire.
If CO2 were to reduce society would struggle to survive. Crops wouldn't grow as well, trees wouldn't grow as well, and history show that low CO2 are associated with higher temps.
Your obviously not a scientist. C02 is highly toxic and kills humans. At low levels it stops thought processes. Atmospheric C02 is currently so high, tree's have passed optimal growth and are starting to reverse and emit C02. As an Environmental scientist, I'm embarrassed for you and others who say the opposite of reality. Who's lies do you listen to daily 🤔
Why can't we do all this work ourselves, we just give all our resources away often at below cost price. The local people are then left without resources, without power etc. Mining should be done by australia and we export the end product, at a fair price.
Exactly, the Greens should be chapioning it and calling for the Government to fund and fast-track it. But they're not a real environmental party, just socialists that talk about climate change and lobby for special interests.
Greens absolutely promote climate activism in our youth, driven by the endless 'the sky is falling' crisis mentality ... a very dangerous party! Local Councils can also have a Sustainability Officer that assists Youth Climate Action Groups, it's criminal using the youth in this way. The Greens are an awful, virtual signalling party.
The QUESTION is, where does the WASTE from Neuclear Plants go to? Another QUESTION is, will the Libertarian Party pander to the " W H O " " W E F "and " U N " ... what will actually change in Australia?
The waste is referred to as spent fuel these days as it still contains 90% of the energy and can be reprocessed and used again. It's perfectly safe to store in a small facility. The Libertarian Party has no interest in Australia being dictated to by international bodies, so no, we won't pander to any of those institutions.
Nuclear power, yes. Now because USA directs our Government , USA will not allow Australia to invest in the Chinese Sodium based nuclear reactor. ( cannot use the by product for war) Changing the subject you have outlined technology would be great for the Australian wealth money to invest in. Western countries have handed the rains over to business to carry our society forward. With that mindset we have accelerated our society downwards. Things need to change NOW. Great speech .
Hydrogen production technology is locked up by patent law controls. Because it can be used to feel missiles. If you don't believe me look try looking up one of the 600+ band or restricted patents that go against American interests. Even hydrogen storage tank technology is limited and controlled.
Don't tax us for carbon production and stop us having nuclear at the same time. Elon brought down the cost of space travel to 1/20 of the cost. The same can be done with nuclear power. We also have geothermal power that is untaped fir a want of so simple tech.
I agree with you about the Greens they are evil incarnate but it sounds like you are just as bad as the uniparty and want to look after your mates in big business in Japan why can’t there just be one politician that actually wants what’s best for Australians instead of looking after the huge multinationals. Fix our royalties issues first. Australians should be rich from all of the natural resources we currently give away.
A hydrogen molecule is different to a hydrogen atom. Two hydrogen atoms in a molecule are burned with oxygen, mostly producing water vapour. The electricity comes from that burning turning a turbine, similar to coal or gas power, but more similar to gas. Some of the uses David refers to in this video though aren't related to electricity production though, a lot of big industrial processes require massive amounts of heat which you can't easily do with electricity, so you need to burn something, usually some form of gas.
@LibertariansAus nah, your taking the piss. Hydrogen is entirely made with inputted energy. Where's the energy coming from and who is footing the bill.
Hi David. Love your work. While nuclear fission energy is 0 carbon emissions, it's not "green." Look into the radioactive waste produced, and look at Fukushima. What Japan is also doing is working on nuclear fusion technology. This is what the focus should be on. This is true green energy. The only waste it produces is more energy. Sun energy. If this can be perfected, then any energy crisis will be over. I'd rather go back to coal and natural gas before doing nuclear fission, as it's the lesser of two evils. But, i agree with how terrible the eco-terrorists Greens are. They are pushing WEF agendas and ideas. They need to go. Now. They are destroying lives. They sre absolutely horrible.
Luckily the volume of nuclear waste that modern reactors produce is absolutely TINY. Modern reactors also don't have enough radioactive material inside them to ever reach critical mass so there is no risk of a meltdown. Also, Australia doesn't have the issue of major earthquakes or tsunami's.
Uranium fission (like Fukkashima, which itself was Japan’s oldest and least safe nuclear reactor when it had its accident) produces little waste compared to carbon energy, though very toxic and problematic. Thorium fission on the other hand produces next to none. Thorium is currently at the commercial adoption phase as the next generation of a cleaner and safer form of nuclear energy. First commercial thorium reactor is due 2025. Fusion is still in the proposal phase. It simply isn’t viable yet. Thorium is the much more viable future and there’s simply no comparison to uranium reactors.
The purpose of the greens is to depopulate the world. Why do that? So rich men can have more stuff. Not to protect the environment. Getting rid of humans means rich humans get to take more stuff. Got it? There are real greenies out there that love to protect the environment, but the green movement itself was hijacked by rich elites who want to depopulate earth. They simply don't want so many people using what they see as thiers.
If you search "coal to hydrogen project Victoria" or "Energy Supply Chain (HESC) Pilot Project" you can find information on it. It's actually a bizarre one for the Greens to oppose. It's taking what they consider a "dirty" fuel source and coverting it to hydrogen, which mostly produces water vapour when burned. Libertarians like it because it's bringing investment into the Victorian economy. David likes it because he's a physics and energy nerd and it's quite innovative, especially at the scale that's proposed.
Have these Greens and associated groups ever taken the time to look over there handy work. Solar and Wind Installations the ecological Destruction of Australia’s pristine Unique Landscape, have they even bothered to conduct research on what Australia Needs true Power to land usage What land mass usage in terms of Sq Km.. for 1 GW wind Solar installations ..compared to 1 GW of Nuclear Power Generation SqKm
Jul 18 2023 Thoughts for the day Wind farms and solar farms have run their race and will not proceed as it has been determined the astronomical costs are not sustainable. An intermittent form of energy as the main component is unacceptable to industry and the population at large. The shelf life of solar and wind infrastructure is short term and replacement is cost prohibitive. Nuclear is a good option as well. Here's a small sample of how many coal plants there are in the world today. I could go into using the advanced technology of thermally efficient, supercritical steam generators using our own world's best metallurgical coal; but what's the point, it is treated as hearsay and political hyperbole here in Oz. The EU has 468 plants, building 27 more for a total of 495. They tell everyone else it's their responsibility to 'Save The Planet' from Climate Change, typical Europeans; morals are a philosophy, honesty is a heresy! Turkey has 56 plants, building 93 more, total 149 South Africa has 79, building 24 more, total 103 India has 589, building 446 more, total 1036 The Philippines has 19, building 60 more, total 79 South Korea has 58, building 26 more, total 84 Japan has 90, building 45 more, total 135 AND CHINA has 2363, building 1171, total 3534 And our AUSTRALIAN politicians are going to shut down our 6 remaining plants and save the planet. Posted 8th February 2016 by harry soothsayer Posted 18th July 2023 by harry soothsayer
Check out Jim Wilmott and Lachlan Lade, they're running for the Senate for the Libertarians up there. We'll be getting some of their videos on this page soon.
The greens are swapping Australia's carbon footprint and sending it to china.The carbon is not ending its just being moved around.Hydogen should be used in our vehicles also. It has no emissions and we can use the same vehicles which greatly saves resources. EVs are far more environmentally bad in their construction than standard vehicles.They still use and will for the next 50 years electricity from fossil fuel power stations.When the batteries are finished we cant,find a environmentally friendly way od disposing of them.We are importing wind turbines from china ,who are the biggest suppliers in the world using coal fires power stations. We are looked on as idiots,like the UK and Europe. Virtue signalling how good wd are by pushing the so called carbon footprint to china India and other emerging economies.
Exactly. The whole climate change movement is littered with dodgy accounting. People giving themselves a pat on the back for things that only exist on paper.
The Greens won't be happy until we're all living in caves.
6 วันที่ผ่านมา
Why did Qatar make seventy-six billion in revenue from its Gas and Australia only made two billion for its Gas in the same period but we sold more Gas than Qatar ? We have been conned out of billions Australia .
Bob Lazar (of area 51 fame) tried to run his Corvette on hydrogen decades ago, but discovered you need a nuclear power plant to create the hydrogen economically……
@@Sparky_D He's the man in the ring. You shouldn't be so critical, whether you really are a better public speaker or not. I ran for office as a Libertarian 6 times, and once appeared in a debate on statewide TV when I ran for US Senate. I think Limbrick is doing a good job, and he deserves gratitude, not criticism.
![LAVROV's interview with Tucker CARLSON 😁 [Parody]](/img/n.gif)
You tell em’, Dave!
All our eggs in one basket is stupidity itself.
Exactly, the complete dependence on fossil fuels being held ransom by Saudi Arabia, Russia and China is the biggest risk to our national security
Did we have a choice, ever? Now that the Libertarian Party has surfaced, we have a bit more choice!
Greens are totally blind to the wind farm graveyards.
Pollutions
@melindatanner5853 lib lab uniparty destroyed Australia's manufacturing so we have no choice but to use non recyclable products. Nats destroyed Australia's farming families, sad
the 3 large ones are batting for the same team
Not their only blindness. And they probably have hairy palms too. They're Neo Marxists who don't understand or respect very basic democratic principles.
Who is our government taking their orders from if not the people they work for ?
The UN.
The UN, WEF, NATO, WHO.
@@jeanfsadni6338not NATO... But add the tri lateral commission and the Fabian society and AIPAC
the lobby groups who donate to their re election
Foreign tax avoiding corporations who bribe the Labor LNP for policy to transfer wealth out of Australia. Sad days
There are no bigger hypocrites than the 'greens'.
Well said, Mr. Limbrick! Wish we had elected Libertarians in the US!
Yes i remember the franklin thing in Tasmania years ago
The Greens and the Teals are a mass of contradictions. On the one hand they claim to be terribly concerned about the environment. Yet, on the other hand, they won't have a bar of cutting Australia"s rapid, excessive and utterly irresponsible population growth which is the biggest single cause of environmental damage.
The Greens had a population policy and dropped it. Hypocrisy is painful yet a coin flip would create better policy than the uniparty
@@nottenvironmental6208 Name one party that is not full of contradictions.
@@amraceway Swingers party. Everyone wants to f##k
Great speech
Very well said Sir, I think this attitude of stopping development applies to most industries in Australia. We have had so much at our fingertips over the years and now it's gone, just like the greens need to be gone. Australia must come first for our own employment. Australia has fell so far behind those in positions of power think we are in front. The catch phrase or Australian conditions or ADR's have killed off a lot of industries and business, in my opinion. Needs to change.
A great speech, glad I joined the Libertarian Party.
Thanks :-) We're glad you joined too.
They are not listening to common sense Dave, anything but common sense
I never yet met a politician who had any common sense, although they do have big bank accounts and own lots of rental houses. People tell me that I should go into politics, but I would rather be an honest billionaire.
What about the mining of Unobtainium? It’s the one critical mineral that is needed to meet The Greens climate targets.
Well said sir
victoria is a shit show
Australia has turned into a shit show.
You tell em David
Thankyou for explanation
Good call out !
We need Carbon for our plants to grow our food to grow. No Carbon no food.
That’s the whole point. The carbon they have issue with is you and I.
Well said Sir.
Thank you David we need you to hold them be accountable. Thank you for telling us about Japan and other issues
Well said sir! Bravo 👏 👏 👏 that is the voice of reason!
What a guy !!!!
Well said…
Not one more wind turbine should be erected due to the destruction of pristine bush land. There is nothing environmentally sound about these turbines.
"Stand on our own feet, embrace technology and move forward."
The greens,, the one's that have brought Germany to it's knees.
The Greens need some self-reflection and some self flagelation.
Nah, they'd enjoy the flagellation too much 😉
That's supported 😅
Every one outside Australia
Bingo!
If CO2 were to reduce society would struggle to survive. Crops wouldn't grow as well, trees wouldn't grow as well, and history show that low CO2 are associated with higher temps.
Your obviously not a scientist. C02 is highly toxic and kills humans. At low levels it stops thought processes. Atmospheric C02 is currently so high, tree's have passed optimal growth and are starting to reverse and emit C02. As an Environmental scientist, I'm embarrassed for you and others who say the opposite of reality. Who's lies do you listen to daily 🤔
And The Desserts.
Its proven that CO2 will green the planet. Search it. I have.
A little extra co2 goes a long long way,,, south of the atlas mountains the Sahara is turning green..it's incredible to see.
The msm seems to be saying the opposite, but it is actually getting greener. Search it and see for yourself.
Australia needs this and especially Victoria needs it.
Well said David, at least there is one person who knows what is actually going on inside that building in Victoria.
Why can't we do all this work ourselves, we just give all our resources away often at below cost price. The local people are then left without resources, without power etc. Mining should be done by australia and we export the end product, at a fair price.
LABOR is emulating the caveman worshiping the sun & the wind . The less developed think we're stupid & they're right. 😂
Oooh Peter
Like "developing" PRC.
Where do these limited people come from, and how do they get into politics ? Pies might fly !
Well said! We need some knowledgeable, unbiased, unpaidfor people in charge.
For the future of our civilized world, we need to teach children real science again and give the climate indoctrination the flick.
I can't believe people still consider the greens....
By product of Hydrogen is eeeek gasp WATER
Exactly, the Greens should be chapioning it and calling for the Government to fund and fast-track it. But they're not a real environmental party, just socialists that talk about climate change and lobby for special interests.
Greens absolutely promote climate activism in our youth, driven by the endless 'the sky is falling' crisis mentality ... a very dangerous party! Local Councils can also have a Sustainability Officer that assists Youth Climate Action Groups, it's criminal using the youth in this way. The Greens are an awful, virtual signalling party.
Do we have enough water though
@@LibertariansAus
Special Interest lobbying
Isn't that the whole of Australian Government
All control by the Lobbyist
The QUESTION is, where does the WASTE from Neuclear Plants go to?
Another QUESTION is, will the Libertarian Party pander to the " W H O " " W E F "and " U N " ... what will actually change in Australia?
The waste is referred to as spent fuel these days as it still contains 90% of the energy and can be reprocessed and used again. It's perfectly safe to store in a small facility.
The Libertarian Party has no interest in Australia being dictated to by international bodies, so no, we won't pander to any of those institutions.
Well said. We need move of this courage and rational thinking.
💯
Nuclear power, yes. Now because USA directs our Government , USA will not allow Australia to invest in the Chinese Sodium based nuclear reactor. ( cannot use the by product for war)
Changing the subject you have outlined technology would be great for the Australian wealth money to invest in. Western countries have handed the rains over to business to carry our society forward. With that mindset we have accelerated our society downwards. Things need to change NOW. Great speech .
There's no fool like an old fool !
Save our forest ocean God bless 😮
Hydrogen is not an answer, physics tells us this.
Can you explain I don't know anything about the hydrogen stuff?? Or a decent link
@@shaneclarence6696 It takes far more energy to produce hydrogen fuel, than the energy contained within the fuel itself
Hydrogen production technology is locked up by patent law controls.
Because it can be used to feel missiles.
If you don't believe me look try looking up one of the 600+ band or restricted patents that go against American interests.
Even hydrogen storage tank technology is limited and controlled.
Don't tax us for carbon production and stop us having nuclear at the same time.
Elon brought down the cost of space travel to 1/20 of the cost.
The same can be done with nuclear power.
We also have geothermal power that is untaped fir a want of so simple tech.
So the answer is wa giving Gas away to gapan and they on selling it making a profit yeh awesome.
Lower prices on solar storage Batteries stuff the grid ill go offline.
I agree with you about the Greens they are evil incarnate but it sounds like you are just as bad as the uniparty and want to look after your mates in big business in Japan why can’t there just be one politician that actually wants what’s best for Australians instead of looking after the huge multinationals. Fix our royalties issues first. Australians should be rich from all of the natural resources we currently give away.
Hydrogen is gaseous electricity. Where does the electricity come from?
Excess solar in the middle of the day? Having said that I’d doubt a hydrogen plan only operating 6 hrs a day would be viable.
A hydrogen molecule is different to a hydrogen atom. Two hydrogen atoms in a molecule are burned with oxygen, mostly producing water vapour. The electricity comes from that burning turning a turbine, similar to coal or gas power, but more similar to gas.
Some of the uses David refers to in this video though aren't related to electricity production though, a lot of big industrial processes require massive amounts of heat which you can't easily do with electricity, so you need to burn something, usually some form of gas.
@LibertariansAus nah, your taking the piss. Hydrogen is entirely made with inputted energy. Where's the energy coming from and who is footing the bill.
@@dirtmcgirt168 I doubt 6 hours a day would be reliable available from photovoltaic surpluses.
Relying on any country that's not our own leaves us at other countries Mercy.
100% right.
brava
Smart people learn from everything & everyone Stupid people have all the answers
Hi David. Love your work. While nuclear fission energy is 0 carbon emissions, it's not "green." Look into the radioactive waste produced, and look at Fukushima.
What Japan is also doing is working on nuclear fusion technology. This is what the focus should be on. This is true green energy. The only waste it produces is more energy. Sun energy. If this can be perfected, then any energy crisis will be over.
I'd rather go back to coal and natural gas before doing nuclear fission, as it's the lesser of two evils.
But, i agree with how terrible the eco-terrorists Greens are. They are pushing WEF agendas and ideas.
They need to go. Now. They are destroying lives. They sre absolutely horrible.
Luckily the volume of nuclear waste that modern reactors produce is absolutely TINY.
Modern reactors also don't have enough radioactive material inside them to ever reach critical mass so there is no risk of a meltdown.
Also, Australia doesn't have the issue of major earthquakes or tsunami's.
Uranium fission (like Fukkashima, which itself was Japan’s oldest and least safe nuclear reactor when it had its accident) produces little waste compared to carbon energy, though very toxic and problematic. Thorium fission on the other hand produces next to none. Thorium is currently at the commercial adoption phase as the next generation of a cleaner and safer form of nuclear energy. First commercial thorium reactor is due 2025. Fusion is still in the proposal phase. It simply isn’t viable yet. Thorium is the much more viable future and there’s simply no comparison to uranium reactors.
The "waste" is in fact re-usable. And even if you were to dispose of it, this has been solved a long time ago.
The purpose of the greens is to depopulate the world. Why do that? So rich men can have more stuff. Not to protect the environment. Getting rid of humans means rich humans get to take more stuff. Got it? There are real greenies out there that love to protect the environment, but the green movement itself was hijacked by rich elites who want to depopulate earth. They simply don't want so many people using what they see as thiers.
Nuclear fusion all the way, but not fission.
What are the Japanese planning?
If you search "coal to hydrogen project Victoria" or "Energy Supply Chain (HESC) Pilot Project" you can find information on it. It's actually a bizarre one for the Greens to oppose. It's taking what they consider a "dirty" fuel source and coverting it to hydrogen, which mostly produces water vapour when burned.
Libertarians like it because it's bringing investment into the Victorian economy. David likes it because he's a physics and energy nerd and it's quite innovative, especially at the scale that's proposed.
Have these Greens and associated groups ever taken the time to look over there handy work. Solar and Wind Installations the ecological Destruction of Australia’s pristine Unique Landscape, have they even bothered to conduct research on what Australia Needs true Power to land usage What land mass usage in terms of Sq Km.. for 1 GW wind Solar installations ..compared to 1 GW of Nuclear Power Generation SqKm
Jul 18 2023
Thoughts for the day
Wind farms and solar farms have run their race and will not proceed as it has been determined the astronomical costs are not sustainable.
An intermittent form of energy as the main component is unacceptable to industry and the population at large.
The shelf life of solar and wind infrastructure is short term and replacement is cost prohibitive.
Nuclear is a good option as well.
Here's a small sample of how many coal plants there are in the world today. I could go into using the advanced technology of thermally efficient, supercritical steam generators using our own world's best metallurgical coal; but what's the point, it is treated as hearsay and political hyperbole here in Oz.
The EU has 468 plants, building 27 more for a total of 495. They tell everyone else it's their responsibility to 'Save The Planet' from Climate Change, typical Europeans; morals are a philosophy, honesty is a heresy!
Turkey has 56 plants, building 93 more, total 149
South Africa has 79, building 24 more, total 103
India has 589, building 446 more, total 1036
The Philippines has 19, building 60 more, total 79
South Korea has 58, building 26 more, total 84
Japan has 90, building 45 more, total 135
AND CHINA has 2363, building 1171, total 3534
And our AUSTRALIAN politicians are going to shut down our 6 remaining plants and save the planet.
Posted 8th February 2016 by harry soothsayer
Posted 18th July 2023 by harry soothsayer
Good job mate , come up to Queensland, we could do with you up here .
Check out Jim Wilmott and Lachlan Lade, they're running for the Senate for the Libertarians up there. We'll be getting some of their videos on this page soon.
He reminds me of Ron Paul
Thanks mate. Your comment was forwarded to David and he's pretty chuffed about it :-)
The greens are swapping Australia's carbon footprint and sending it to china.The carbon is not ending its just being moved around.Hydogen should be used in our vehicles also. It has no emissions and we can use the same vehicles which greatly saves resources. EVs are far more environmentally bad in their construction than standard vehicles.They still use and will for the next 50 years electricity from fossil fuel power stations.When the batteries are finished we cant,find a environmentally friendly way od disposing of them.We are importing wind turbines from china ,who are the biggest suppliers in the world using coal fires power stations. We are looked on as idiots,like the UK and Europe. Virtue signalling how good wd are by pushing the so called carbon footprint to china India and other emerging economies.
Exactly. The whole climate change movement is littered with dodgy accounting. People giving themselves a pat on the back for things that only exist on paper.
hey hey
Greens' completely sick of their crap experience policy's 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 5 star vommit
Had a greenie tell me if we had renewable energy we wouldn’t pay for electricity 😂
The Greens won't be happy until we're all living in caves.
Why did Qatar make seventy-six billion in revenue from its Gas and Australia only made two billion for its Gas in the same period but we sold more Gas than Qatar ? We have been conned out of billions Australia .
The green is nothing but a woke party period.
Bob Lazar (of area 51 fame) tried to run his Corvette on hydrogen decades ago, but discovered you need a nuclear power plant to create the hydrogen economically……
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
That's All I hear
🧟♀️🤑🧟🤡🧟♂️😈🧌☠️
Another sunny day in Western Australia, my solar panels have been working away producing lots of lovely electricity for free.
and tomorrow could be cloudy and raining.
Yeah so what's your plan for public housing and climate,"newbie" 🤔
He is of course right, but he is such a poor speaker he won't get any where, time to retire David.
I was thinking the same. He is on the right track but stumbled through that entire speech.
@@Sparky_D Neither of you could have done better.
@freesk8 you have no idea who I am so don't go throwing around unfounded comments. I spent years speaking in front of big groups of people daily.
@@Sparky_D He's the man in the ring. You shouldn't be so critical, whether you really are a better public speaker or not. I ran for office as a Libertarian 6 times, and once appeared in a debate on statewide TV when I ran for US Senate. I think Limbrick is doing a good job, and he deserves gratitude, not criticism.
This cooker couldn't take down Christmas decorations
rather be a cooker than a clotter
Cooker not a clotter? Demented conspiracy theory for the hard of thinking.
Glad to see you're watching troll. You might learn something.
What he said must've gone in one ear and out the with you even faster than it would with Casanova Bowen, if that's possible?