19:09 1st day E1 - 4th place vs 5th place 2nd day Q1 - 1st place vs 2nd place 3rd day Q2 - 3rd place vs E1 winner 4th day break 5th day E2 - Q2 winner vs Q1 loser 6th day break 7th day Final - Q1 winner vs E2 winner
What about this one😅 table topper - direct finals Playoffs 1 2 v 5 Playoffs 2 3 v 4 Qualifiers PO 1 winner vs PO 2 winner Then Finals Table topper vs qualified team Any one like this format?😅
@@MONKiio No bro 👎...... ( No.2 Place Deserved For No.1 Place ) 2nd Team Not acceptable playing with 5th place Team😑 ( 2 and 3 Play Q1 ) ( 4 and 5 Eliminator ) ( Q1 vs E ) winning Team play for Final ok
@@NaveenKumar-bs7wb simple bro if table topper directly qualified to finals so we need to give some leverage for #2 so they need to take weaker among others so its #5(based on points ) then #3 with #4
Yesss Chasing 240 is great when it happens rarely If it happens frequently there is no value or entertainment Last ipl attracted lots of new fans with high scores and batting focused games At the same time many core audience like me lost intrest due to lack of balance between the bat and ball
@@avinashm2255 For real I got used to high scores where punjab chased 260 and I didn't even get excited. Such a poor ipl in terms of competition between bat and ball.
@@naveenpandiana8688Adhu Ellam over than reduce pannanga. Ella format layum test ah irunthalum seri t10 ah irunthalum seri 11 players than Aadunanga.andhu game structure a affect pannathu.ipl a literal ah 12 players Aaduranga
Impact rule is wrong bro. In ICC tournaments there is no impact rule. If players and team managements are used to impact rule in IPL they will struggle a lot with the combinations in ICC tournaments. With this impact player rule one player is not at all fielding which will affect his gameplay when he plays international tournaments. And also i wont agree with ur opinion on all rounders. With this rule someone like washington sundar is being benched through out the tournament.
The Impact player rule mainly Affects the Discipline of a player to be present on the field for the Entire innings 😢. It's better to scrap this rule 😔.
@@harishshan16 there are alrounders. you got pandya, axar patel, etc. in last 15 years. even venky iyer used to bowl for kkr when there was no impact player rule.
exactly you hit the nail on the head. This is what they should've discussed. Impact player rule will eventually reduce the fielding ability of a player and also advocates a sense of non-involvement in the match.
In the age of 37 ash anna bowling la adi vaanga ready but young Ipl bowlers Mindset same aa irukathu because IPL and international pitches also different irukum .
PDogg's point on impact sub absolutely makes sense. It brings innovation in the game without affecting the core of the game. If a batting team is struggling, they can replace a bowler with batter. In the same sense, if bowlig team is struggling, they can replace the batter with a good bowler. The game becomes more strategic.
Bowling-first team will include an all-rounder (6th bowling option) in the XI and use only if desperate. They can replace him with a better batter to help with the chase.
we can't compare between hockey or football to cricket because cricket is a 1 (Bowler) vs 1 (Batsman) but in hockey and football it is 1 vs 11 so substitutions won't make much of a difference
Pdogg is correct. In football when a defender is replaced by a forward still the defence is going to be compromised. Where as in IPL, when you replace a bowler who has bowled 4 overs with a power hitter opener then you are definitely playing with an extra player.
Please don't underestimate the audience. Audience doesn't expect every match to be an High scoring match. Yes there are many who wants that, and they bring alot of revenue to the game as well. Bt you need to raise the standard of that group rather than feeding them what they want. There shd be balance in that. The game should evolve bt in it's own way to show the beauty of that game.
Do you really think frequent 250+ scores have entertainment value? There is a limit for everything. If something becomes too common, it loses it's value.
@@Dys12-l7z that makes too difficult for the 5th or 4th team since requires a winning streak of 4 matches that's totally unfair. Q1 - Winner of 1st and 2nd - direct final. E1 - Q1 loser vs 3rd team E2 - 4th team vs 5th team Q2 - E1 winner vs E2 winner Final - Q1 winner vs Q2 winner
Ashwin anna, Yes, Impact player rule is good. But both teams need to announce who going to play as impact player at end of 10th over of first inngs. It will give some clear idea for both...
Everything is fine But i think many forgot about low scoring thrillers.... We needed it badly during the start of last ipl as everyone coming in to bat will be hitting everyball, which will reduce the interest to watch ipl if it happens everyday. The thing is if batsmen are going to smash bowlers all the time then definitely the brand IPL will be vanished. We need both high scoring and low scoring thrillers which is only possible with the pitch quality.. Impact player rule dont affect much when pitch is considered
6 for 19 is more better than 143*. Defending the low score game will always gives a thrill feeling Ash Anna ❤ As a cricket fan the impact sub rule should be sacked
Not all audiences like high scoring matches. Regular cricket watchers love all kind of games mixed, low and high scoring matches. Not all fans like high scoring matches
instead of pdogg's playoffs model ,i think this would be a better model 1st placed team - direct finalist 2nd vs 5th eliminator and 3rd vs 4th eliminator then winner of eliminator 1 vs winner of eliminator 2 as qualifier then 1st vs winner of qualifier as grand final,
Playoffs First vs second team semi final 1 winner _ Final Fourth vs fifth team_quarter final 1 Winner of the quarter final 1 vs third team _ quarter final 2 Quarter final 2 winner vs semi final losser 1 _ semi final 2 _final Final ❤ Enna Anna Soluri ga
1st team direct finals 2nd team direct semi finals 3rd 4th 5th 6th quarter finals (this match on same day afternoon and night match) In 10 teams eliminating 4teams would be fair
On same day will affect the business of IPL 😂 Instead lets keep decider match between 4 & 5 only if they have same points with little difference in run rate ‼️
Impact player rule subs in football Football - 1 on 1 action doesn't dominate the entire game. One defender is beaten, the next one covers for him. Tennis - after 2 sets you replace a player and instead of federer vs xyz it's suddenly federer vs nadal, doesn't it make it a different game suddenly? Cricket is a hybrid of both. It emphasises on individual actions more than football but not as much as tennis. You see it similar to football, pdogg sees it similar to tennis.
The team that finishes first goes directly to Finals and there will be competition among the 2nd, 3rd and 4th team like a Tri series for the Final spot 🔥🔥.
More than sport we are looking at IPL as an entertainment..... Which is wrong... The below things should be implemented... 1. Remove impact player rule 1. Boundaries should be pushed back 2. Pitches should be more of bowler friendly 3. Ball quality should be improved and swing more 4. Power play should be broken into 2 parts .. 3 overs for batting team and 3 for bowlers.... 5. More favorable rules for bowlers, if not 10 years from now you won't find bowlers 6. Last 3 overs... Fielders can field anywhere and no field restrictions... Ashwin, please consider my comment
My playoff suggestion 1st place - direct finalist 2 vs 5 - Eliminator 1 @ 2s home 3 vs 4 - Eliminator 2 @ 3s home E1 vs E2 - Qualifier neutral venue 1 vs Qualifier winner - Final neutral venue
If it continues to be like what ash na says, in future, no kids will try to become a bowler and everyone should try to become a batsman. Cricket is a game where batsman and bowlers need equal importance.
Like Ash na said impact player brings more entertainment towards cricket but on the game point of view we must understand one thing.... Ipl is the gateway for our Indian grooming youngsters to get into Indian team, Agree?.... Then this impact player may ruin our future cricketers...... Let's take Nattu, he is used as an impact player,right!?..then it means he is not fielding which I feel as a major drawback.... May be he might miss out Ind team due to this who knows....Ok Nattu may be a proven younger... But apply this same case for upcoming youngsters, who might do well with the ball but not with the bat and fielding because he didn't get any opportunity....... Let's say in the future Indian team is searching for an all-rounder, a guy like Sameer Rizvi might be an all-rounder but he may not be selected by the Indian team because CSK haven't used him, so his hidden talents are already been hidden before it's being exposed! But at the end of the day I too a person who enjoys this impact player rule... What to do, we are prepared our minds like that😅!
Impact player rule should be 1. If u r batting 1st and u want to get an impact player while bowling means the out player should be in field for 5 overs 2. If u r batting second , the impact batter should be in field for 5 overs Football and hockey the both in and out players in a field for some time but in cricket its not happening. Player played for 2 balls got out then he sit in abench for entire match
I agree with PDogg. This year the 1st half IPL was a boring reason being boundary fatigue. Fed up of boundary scoring frequency which reduced the beauty of the game. As a cricket viewer, purist high scoring game is not the normal.
Day 1, Eliminator 1 = 5 Vs 6 Day 2, Eliminator 2 = 3 Vs 4 Day 3, Qualifier 1 = 1 Vs 2 Day 4, Challenger = Eliminator 1 Winner Vs Eliminator 2 winner Day 5 break Day 6, Qualifier 2 = Qualifier 1 loser Vs Challenger winner Day 7 break Day 8, Finals = Qualifier 1 winner Vs Qualifier 2 winner
I am against the impact sub as the game itself changes its basics from playing 11 to 12. And I completely agree with Pdogg on the impact sub. What is more surprising and shocking is Ashwin backing the impact sub rule saying T20 is not cricket and a different game 🤣
I was in Egmore museum..There was a quize programme going on...When i opened the video..someone screamed... RAVICHANDRAN ASHWIN.. THAT'S AN EXELLENT ANSWER ..😂
Agree with prasanna sir's idea of Five team qualify but... Table topper through finals 2 vs 5 E1 3 vs 4 E2 Eliminator matches on same day in common venue Winners of eliminators will play play off Table top vs winner of playoff in final
If impact rule should apply only on Indian player's....they apply this rule uncapped player's get more chance and impact rule is finally accepted my people's
19:18 no , apadi irundha half cup ha top 1 ku kudutha Mari aagidum . Ipadi veha nalla irukum Knockouts * Quarter final - top 2 vs top 3 * Eliminator - top 4 vs top 5 * Semi final 1 - top 1 vs winner of Q final * Semi final 2 - winner of eliminator vs loser of quarter final * Final - winner of semi final 1&2
Pdogg's 5 team qualification is crazy and I don't think it's fine😂 Instead we can make a decider match between 4th and 5th team, If both have same points and very little difference in run rate💯‼️
I don't mind having the impact player rule. Having an extra batter while batting means that the batters have the license to attack from the get go without having the fear of getting out which led to those big scores last season. From a bowling perspective, having an extra bowler gives the flexibility to rotate bowlers such that if a bowler gets hit for runs you can stop bowling him and rely on the extra bowler. It works for both batting and bowling.
When there were no Imp sub Rule players like Venky Iyer ,washi ,Dube were Bowling which helped ICT to develop their AR to gain confidence with high standards. IMP rule ruined everything ...Washi la pavammmm playing 11 la Koda idam illa....😮
Impact rule is fine to there to bring more interesting on game - modifications in rules are fine within the rule 5 teams qualifications is good idea (2 vs 4) and (3 vs 5) Qualifier - Winner of 2vs4 & Winner of 3 vs 5 Final - 1st vs the Qualifier
An Idea of new playoffs schedule Special mention: No. 1 team directly qualified into Q1 and they are the home team for Q1 they can choose the pitch conditions. 2 and 3 have a another chance to make into final Eliminator 1: 2 vs 3 Eliminator 2: 4 vs 5 Qualifier 1: 1 (DQ) vs Winner of E1 Qualifier 2:looser of E1 vs Winner of E2 Finals : Winner of Q1 vs Winner of Q2
Acc to me impact player rule should be allowed only when pitch becomes equal for both batters and bowlers. Last year pitch bowlers ku support eyy aagalaa adhukumella andha impact player rule naala batting team bowlers ahh savadhichitaanga 🫠. Pitch should favour both batters and bowlers only then impact player rule should be allowed
Pdogg's playoffs format has a hole. No.1 Team goes to Finals directly- *FAIR* No.3 Team has to win two consecutive matches to enter Finals just like the current format- *FAIR* No.4&No.5 Teams have to win 3 consecutive matches to enter Finals, since they are the last two teams- *FAIR* No.2 Team has to win one match to enter Finals just like the current format *BUT* if they lose, they're out of the league which is *UNFAIR* . Then what's the point in finishing 2nd in a tournament where your qualifier match is also your eliminator match. They're at a disadvantage here when compared with current format in which they get 2 chances to qualify for Finals. I think 5 team playoffs is great, but it has to be fine tuned.
Actually Ash was absolutely right. T20 to be considered a different game like a subset of cricket so we can introduce any Innovative thoughts and rules and also both team can use impact player right, so if a batsman come as impact, a bowler also come as impact right so there will equal chance for scoring runs or getting his wicket.
3 things to mention 1. Impact player : either no impact player or to have impact player for both innings for a team (even I had similar idea, but with a small clause like the over num of introducing impact player for a team in a match should be same for both innings just to have more fun) 2. 5 teams to qualify similar to BBL, but playoffs like PGodd suggested is fine 3. Playoffs to be played in neutral venues, how many venues we have in India, which do not get an international match for years together, simple idea is we have 5 playoffs matches, one for each zone - north, east, west, south and Central, by doing this those smaller ground would get more attraction towards them and God revenue helping develop tourism as well. As this is going to be fixed even before start of the season transportation should be fine and there should be no complaints. Ash/PGodd any thoughts on #3, maybe in your next video.. please share.. would feel happy...
Ash & PDogg - Great discussion on Impact player. Good point by Prasanna. Alternatively - Why not have a system of having negative 5 runs (penalty point) say to an impact player choosing team or adding positive 5 runs for the opposite team when the other team choose for it. This is like creating a situation of level playing field for the other team choosing the 12th player. Will also form a pressure for the opting team or impact player to also demonstrate the trust and the penalty points. Just my view. Your views @Ashwin and @PDogg. Thanks
Im against the concept of impact player rule because initially a team expects all of their payers to contribute equally and to their full extent. But now, the franchise expects extraodinary from the impact player and the value that the other players bring to the table is less considered. This impact substitute cannot be compared with substitution of a football game becoz in football , even if a midfielder is substituted with a striker, the entire team goes into an attacking mode and thus it does not reduce the ability of the defender or any of the 11 players on the field to showcase his talent or to prove himself. Thus, in football , how many ever substitution are made, it gives an opportunity for all the players on the field to express himself completely and no player will have a feeling of less represented. But in cricket, it become a senario that the entire team is revoling around the impact player and it restricts the talent of other players to be showcased. Ex- if a player in actual playing 11 can bowl 2 or 3 over in ipl standard, he is totally overshadowed by the impact player.
Cricket is not about dhoni coming at no5 and finishing the game and a ashwin coming and taking wicket it's all about ( bowler hitting four and a parttime bowler taking wicket and winning the game) ithuthanga cricket paaka nalla irukum
As usual great video Ash Anna :-) It would be awesome if you could make a video highlighting talented players who haven’t had the chance to prove themselves in the IPL yet. It could help other franchises keep an eye on them and potentially give them the opportunity they deserve.
PDogg seemed to keep getting back to the fact that it is not a playing eleven but a playing twelve, but had no reason why that was a bad thing. Another example of inflexible thought processes. I am amazed at Ashwin's clarity and foresight which is not usual for a long-term international player who generally get boxed into self preservation thinking. He is sure to be one of the great thinkers of the game after his playing days. And oh, a sport's endeavour should be to strive a balance between the two teams as much as possible i.e. Best bowling versus best batting team. Balance within a playing eleven is not a principle based on anything other than "oh it's always been this way". The sooner we get the best bowlers going up against the best batsmen the better for the game. Playing eleven or playing sixteen doesn't matter.
1 st place straight into Q1 Day 1- 2nd and 3rd will play Q1 Qualifier Day 2- 4th and 5th will play E1 Day 3- Q1 -1st and Q1 Qualifier winner Day 4- E2 - Q1 loser and E1 winner Day 5 break Day 6- Q2 - Q1 loser and E2 winner Day 7- break Day 8- Finals - Q1 winner vs Q2 winner It gives more value to Table top team and 5 th place also get a chance and playoff gets more interesting
I agree with Ashwin should give 2 or more, my idea would be to have bowling side and batting side completely new like American football. This increases players pool more get benefited playing sport. More strategy plays in that way. Audience gets increased awareness and coach plays important role. I know it's a far fetch with current climate but hoping to happen one day. Immediately one suggestion would be to change the ball whenever bowler wants like 3 times in an innings so you can choose what ball like old new semi new according to batsmen and skill of the bowler plus pitch conditions which can even bat and ball
I think the problem is having two different team sheets based on the outcome of toss and the impact player rule together. Start with a playing xi and based on the progress of the game take your impact player from 4. The problem is not only in the rule, but the way the rule can be used innovatively by each team based on composition. What we saw was xii vs xii which took the interest away from the game.
Wanted to let you know guys... The happiness which i get when you release a video with Ashwin and pdpgg is nothing lesser than seeing a mother after 6 months long trip ❤️. You guys are such stress buster. Love you 3000 both of yoy
Impact player should be uncapped player. Whether it is indian Or foreign player
Agree bro 💯
Great thoughts !
Agreed
Nice idea ❤❤
Extraordinary thinking bro 👌💯
19:09
1st day E1 - 4th place vs 5th place
2nd day Q1 - 1st place vs 2nd place
3rd day Q2 - 3rd place vs E1 winner
4th day break
5th day E2 - Q2 winner vs Q1 loser
6th day break
7th day Final - Q1 winner vs E2 winner
🙌💥
Pkl rules 💥
What about this one😅
table topper - direct finals
Playoffs 1
2 v 5
Playoffs 2
3 v 4
Qualifiers
PO 1 winner vs PO 2 winner
Then
Finals
Table topper vs qualified team
Any one like this format?😅
@@MONKiio No bro 👎...... ( No.2 Place Deserved For No.1 Place ) 2nd Team Not acceptable playing with 5th place Team😑
( 2 and 3 Play Q1 )
( 4 and 5 Eliminator )
( Q1 vs E ) winning Team play for Final ok
@@NaveenKumar-bs7wb simple bro if table topper directly qualified to finals so we need to give some leverage for #2 so they need to take weaker among others so its #5(based on points ) then #3 with #4
Ashwin wearing the Batman t shirt and supporting T20 as Batsman game. 😅 power of the Tee.
Successfully Defending 150 is way better than Successfully Chasing 240😢
Yesss
Chasing 240 is great when it happens rarely
If it happens frequently there is no value or entertainment
Last ipl attracted lots of new fans with high scores and batting focused games
At the same time many core audience like me lost intrest due to lack of balance between the bat and ball
That is called substitute
@@avinashm2255 For real I got used to high scores where punjab chased 260 and I didn't even get excited. Such a poor ipl in terms of competition between bat and ball.
Ash anna wasn't supporting impact player he is expressing indirectly about his pain in ipl as a bowler😂
Playing with 12 or 13 players, is really collapsing the basic structure of the game ..
Let it collapse. . playing IPL is also collapsing test cricket
Odi 60 laa irunthu 50 test 6 days la irunthu 5 days apolaam collapse aah theriyalla yaa bro unakku
@@naveenpandiana8688 In that case also they didn't changed the fundamentals of the game they just changed the things in the format....
@@naveenpandiana8688Adhu Ellam over than reduce pannanga. Ella format layum test ah irunthalum seri t10 ah irunthalum seri 11 players than Aadunanga.andhu game structure a affect pannathu.ipl a literal ah 12 players Aaduranga
Pdogg Cricket, Tennis and Now worked for Hockey also?😲😲 Yov Yaaruya Nee... Too many talents Vachuttu Gumnu Humunu Irukinga... Super❤
Impact rule is wrong bro. In ICC tournaments there is no impact rule. If players and team managements are used to impact rule in IPL they will struggle a lot with the combinations in ICC tournaments. With this impact player rule one player is not at all fielding which will affect his gameplay when he plays international tournaments. And also i wont agree with ur opinion on all rounders. With this rule someone like washington sundar is being benched through out the tournament.
The Impact player rule mainly Affects the Discipline of a player to be present on the field for the Entire innings 😢. It's better to scrap this rule 😔.
Where the buck is all rounder for 15 years ???
Just one player taking rest nothing wrong
@@harishshan16 there are alrounders. you got pandya, axar patel, etc. in last 15 years. even venky iyer used to bowl for kkr when there was no impact player rule.
exactly you hit the nail on the head. This is what they should've discussed. Impact player rule will eventually reduce the fielding ability of a player and also advocates a sense of non-involvement in the match.
Exactly..shivam dube bats for 30 balls for csk and he never takes the field ..
He was really struggling with his fielding on internationals
Pdogg and Kalyanam references. Epic.
Pdogg sonna 5 team playoffs semma idea. Ithuku avar sonna ella pointsum validah irunthuchu 19:08
In the age of 37 ash anna bowling la adi vaanga ready but young Ipl bowlers Mindset same aa irukathu because IPL and international pitches also different irukum .
Successful defending 159 is way better than successfuly chassing 240😢
PDogg's point on impact sub absolutely makes sense. It brings innovation in the game without affecting the core of the game. If a batting team is struggling, they can replace a bowler with batter. In the same sense, if bowlig team is struggling, they can replace the batter with a good bowler. The game becomes more strategic.
Pdogg's impact player rule will only be favorable for first batting teams , for first bowling none can hide a bowler
Bowling-first team will include an all-rounder (6th bowling option) in the XI and use only if desperate. They can replace him with a better batter to help with the chase.
@@peterfile2049 You need min 5 bowlers , but in terms of batsman min 2 , so this may not be a way
we can't compare between hockey or football to cricket because cricket is a 1 (Bowler) vs 1 (Batsman) but in hockey and football it is 1 vs 11 so substitutions won't make much of a difference
Stupid comparison by ash today 🤮
Pdogg is correct. In football when a defender is replaced by a forward still the defence is going to be compromised. Where as in IPL, when you replace a bowler who has bowled 4 overs with a power hitter opener then you are definitely playing with an extra player.
7:35 exactly I am thinking 🔥
Ash oru 5 years la ipl director ayitaru na Pdogg ah consultant ah vechi, IPL ah apdiye poratti poturlam. Game changing mechanics !
Aama, innings break la aliens lam vandhu item songs um aaduvanga nu expect panalam 😁😁
@@vijay-y5q yen ya ipdi oru aasa laam irukara prachana pathadha :D
23:15 PDogg Seriyana Point❤️🔥 IPL win pananum na Kastam padanum💯💛
Whattan exciting season it's gonna be. Hope the talent scout is looking at TNPL and Maharaja trophy closely.
Please don't underestimate the audience. Audience doesn't expect every match to be an High scoring match. Yes there are many who wants that, and they bring alot of revenue to the game as well. Bt you need to raise the standard of that group rather than feeding them what they want. There shd be balance in that. The game should evolve bt in it's own way to show the beauty of that game.
Do you really think frequent 250+ scores have entertainment value? There is a limit for everything. If something becomes too common, it loses it's value.
20:10 ithu othukuren nalla innovation ya irkum pdogg👏🏻
Defending a low score is always a treat for the fans than High Score matches
Completely agreed with PGODD
1 vs 2- Sf 1
4 vs 5 -E1
E1 Winner vs 3 -E2
E2 winner vs Sf1 Loser - SF 2
Finals - SF 1 winner vs SF 2 winner
👏👏
1 vs WSF - Final
2 vs WQ - Semi Final
3 vs WE - Qualifier
4 vs 5 - eliminator
@@Dys12-l7z that makes too difficult for the 5th or 4th team since requires a winning streak of 4 matches that's totally unfair.
Q1 - Winner of 1st and 2nd - direct final.
E1 - Q1 loser vs 3rd team
E2 - 4th team vs 5th team
Q2 - E1 winner vs E2 winner
Final - Q1 winner vs Q2 winner
4,5 th place la veravan sethan
..
Ashwin anna,
Yes, Impact player rule is good. But both teams need to announce who going to play as impact player at end of 10th over of first inngs.
It will give some clear idea for both...
Everything is fine
But i think many forgot about low scoring thrillers.... We needed it badly during the start of last ipl as everyone coming in to bat will be hitting everyball, which will reduce the interest to watch ipl if it happens everyday. The thing is if batsmen are going to smash bowlers all the time then definitely the brand IPL will be vanished. We need both high scoring and low scoring thrillers which is only possible with the pitch quality.. Impact player rule dont affect much when pitch is considered
Low scoring matches are real thrillers. High scoring mathes are really boring
@Ashwin paaji will you be part of CSK in 2025?
That doesn’t in his hands dude😂😂
As long as dhoni is there , Ashwin can never play 😅😂
Common man needs entertainment so they want impact player but, as a genuine cricket fan wants only purest form of cricket.
The Videos Is Like To Be Goat Trailer 🤣🤣 Starting With Anna Varar Vaziye Vidu Ending With Marutha Malai Murugan Song !!! 😂😂😂
Boundaries create excitement to fan but every 2 ball 1 boundary create new excitement for dot ball😂😂😂
6 for 19 is more better than 143*. Defending the low score game will always gives a thrill feeling Ash Anna ❤ As a cricket fan the impact sub rule should be sacked
Not all audiences like high scoring matches. Regular cricket watchers love all kind of games mixed, low and high scoring matches. Not all fans like high scoring matches
instead of pdogg's playoffs model ,i think this would be a better model
1st placed team - direct finalist
2nd vs 5th eliminator and 3rd vs 4th eliminator
then winner of eliminator 1 vs winner of eliminator 2 as qualifier
then 1st vs winner of qualifier as grand final,
Playoffs
First vs second team semi final 1 winner _ Final
Fourth vs fifth team_quarter final 1
Winner of the quarter final 1 vs third team _ quarter final 2
Quarter final 2 winner vs semi final losser 1 _ semi final 2 _final
Final ❤ Enna Anna Soluri ga
14:56 😂😂
1st team direct finals
2nd team direct semi finals
3rd 4th 5th 6th quarter finals (this match on same day afternoon and night match)
In 10 teams eliminating 4teams would be fair
On same day will affect the business of IPL 😂
Instead lets keep decider match between 4 & 5 only if they have same points with little difference in run rate ‼️
@im1480 💯
Already india is in great demand of allrounders.. impact sub demotivate franchise to pick a allrounder they will pick pure bowler & batsmen
Agreeing with Pdogg, don't want a Impact player as a cricket purist.
Impact player rule subs in football
Football -
1 on 1 action doesn't dominate the entire game. One defender is beaten, the next one covers for him.
Tennis - after 2 sets you replace a player and instead of federer vs xyz it's suddenly federer vs nadal, doesn't it make it a different game suddenly?
Cricket is a hybrid of both. It emphasises on individual actions more than football but not as much as tennis. You see it similar to football, pdogg sees it similar to tennis.
The team that finishes first goes directly to Finals and there will be competition among the 2nd, 3rd and 4th team like a Tri series for the Final spot 🔥🔥.
No chance 😂
More than sport we are looking at IPL as an entertainment..... Which is wrong... The below things should be implemented...
1. Remove impact player rule
1. Boundaries should be pushed back
2. Pitches should be more of bowler friendly
3. Ball quality should be improved and swing more
4. Power play should be broken into 2 parts .. 3 overs for batting team and 3 for bowlers....
5. More favorable rules for bowlers, if not 10 years from now you won't find bowlers
6. Last 3 overs... Fielders can field anywhere and no field restrictions...
Ashwin, please consider my comment
19:08 PDogg's playoff idea is great, wish it happens... TOP 5 TEAMS IN THE PLAYOFFS, it'll be absolute CINEMA 🔥🛐
My playoff suggestion
1st place - direct finalist
2 vs 5 - Eliminator 1 @ 2s home
3 vs 4 - Eliminator 2 @ 3s home
E1 vs E2 - Qualifier neutral venue
1 vs Qualifier winner - Final neutral venue
Need a video on auction dynamics set order and strategies by team to get their players in a particular set
14:20 Vera level thalaiva... Enna rule.... Enna poo....
pdoggs impact rule only works for team batting first which was used by RR last season by saving Powell till the end of innings while batting first.
If it continues to be like what ash na says, in future, no kids will try to become a bowler and everyone should try to become a batsman. Cricket is a game where batsman and bowlers need equal importance.
Like Ash na said impact player brings more entertainment towards cricket but on the game point of view we must understand one thing.... Ipl is the gateway for our Indian grooming youngsters to get into Indian team, Agree?.... Then this impact player may ruin our future cricketers...... Let's take Nattu, he is used as an impact player,right!?..then it means he is not fielding which I feel as a major drawback.... May be he might miss out Ind team due to this who knows....Ok Nattu may be a proven younger... But apply this same case for upcoming youngsters, who might do well with the ball but not with the bat and fielding because he didn't get any opportunity....... Let's say in the future Indian team is searching for an all-rounder, a guy like Sameer Rizvi might be an all-rounder but he may not be selected by the Indian team because CSK haven't used him, so his hidden talents are already been hidden before it's being exposed!
But at the end of the day I too a person who enjoys this impact player rule... What to do, we are prepared our minds like that😅!
PDogg's rule makes a lot sense and is a great compromise.
Impact player is entertainment for cricket. Because money.
Pdogg idea about impact player rule is very good
17:22😂😂to 17:34😂😂
Impact player rule should be
1. If u r batting 1st and u want to get an impact player while bowling means the out player should be in field for 5 overs
2. If u r batting second , the impact batter should be in field for 5 overs
Football and hockey the both in and out players in a field for some time but in cricket its not happening. Player played for 2 balls got out then he sit in abench for entire match
1st CSK at Chepauk, 2nd Punjab Kings at Dharamshala, 3rd RCB at Bangalore & 4th KKR at Kolkata will be mass travel for the 5th placed team.
😂🙌
Impact player should be done away with, it adds to the excitement and entertainment no doubt but takes away the value of true Cricket sense.
Prasanna soon in KKR
I agree with PDogg. This year the 1st half IPL was a boring reason being boundary fatigue. Fed up of boundary scoring frequency which reduced the beauty of the game. As a cricket viewer, purist high scoring game is not the normal.
The same ash who says no to switch hits, now says i am ready to get hit... 😅
Day 1, Eliminator 1 = 5 Vs 6
Day 2, Eliminator 2 = 3 Vs 4
Day 3, Qualifier 1 = 1 Vs 2
Day 4, Challenger = Eliminator 1 Winner Vs Eliminator 2 winner
Day 5 break
Day 6, Qualifier 2 = Qualifier 1 loser Vs Challenger winner
Day 7 break
Day 8, Finals = Qualifier 1 winner Vs Qualifier 2 winner
Ash Anna ❣️
I am against the impact sub as the game itself changes its basics from playing 11 to 12. And I completely agree with Pdogg on the impact sub.
What is more surprising and shocking is Ashwin backing the impact sub rule saying T20 is not cricket and a different game 🤣
Pdogg impact sub idea is correct
I was in Egmore museum..There was a quize programme going on...When i opened the video..someone screamed...
RAVICHANDRAN ASHWIN..
THAT'S AN EXELLENT ANSWER
..😂
Ash 2025 in rcb ✅
Lol😂😂
Kl Rahul 2025 in RCB ✅
@@wlverine7195Gautam Gambhir 2025 RCB Captain ✅
Agree with prasanna sir's idea of Five team qualify but...
Table topper through finals
2 vs 5 E1
3 vs 4 E2
Eliminator matches on same day in common venue
Winners of eliminators will play play off
Table top vs winner of playoff in final
If impact rule should apply only on Indian player's....they apply this rule uncapped player's get more chance and impact rule is finally accepted my people's
Good bro my idea also same 🎉🎉
19:18 no , apadi irundha half cup ha top 1 ku kudutha Mari aagidum . Ipadi veha nalla irukum
Knockouts
* Quarter final - top 2 vs top 3
* Eliminator - top 4 vs top 5
* Semi final 1 - top 1 vs winner of Q final
* Semi final 2 - winner of eliminator vs loser of quarter final
* Final - winner of semi final 1&2
Pdogg's 5 team qualification is crazy and I don't think it's fine😂
Instead we can make a decider match between 4th and 5th team, If both have same points and very little difference in run rate💯‼️
I don't mind having the impact player rule. Having an extra batter while batting means that the batters have the license to attack from the get go without having the fear of getting out which led to those big scores last season. From a bowling perspective, having an extra bowler gives the flexibility to rotate bowlers such that if a bowler gets hit for runs you can stop bowling him and rely on the extra bowler. It works for both batting and bowling.
1st place - direct final
2nd vs 3rd place - eliminator 1
4th vs 5th place - eliminator 2
Eliminator 1 vs Eliminator 2 - qualifier
Thank me later!👍🏻
So Simple Right!
When there were no Imp sub Rule players like Venky Iyer ,washi ,Dube were Bowling which helped ICT to develop their AR to gain confidence with high standards. IMP rule ruined everything ...Washi la pavammmm playing 11 la Koda idam illa....😮
I don't want the impact player rule. I also don't want the rule tweaked like PDogg said.
Impact rule is fine to there to bring more interesting on game - modifications in rules are fine within the rule
5 teams qualifications is good idea
(2 vs 4) and (3 vs 5)
Qualifier - Winner of 2vs4 & Winner of 3 vs 5
Final - 1st vs the Qualifier
Ms dhoni fans assemble 👇👇
like psyco 🤡
எங்க போனாலும் வந்தது.....?😂😂
Thala for reason 😂😂😂😂😂
I hate dhoni😅
An Idea of new playoffs schedule
Special mention: No. 1 team directly qualified into Q1 and they are the home team for Q1 they can choose the pitch conditions.
2 and 3 have a another chance to make into final
Eliminator 1: 2 vs 3
Eliminator 2: 4 vs 5
Qualifier 1: 1 (DQ) vs Winner of E1
Qualifier 2:looser of E1 vs Winner of E2
Finals : Winner of Q1 vs Winner of Q2
Virat fans assemble ❤
thats a great thought having 1 impact player for batting and 1 for bowling substitute .!!!
Acc to me impact player rule should be allowed only when pitch becomes equal for both batters and bowlers. Last year pitch bowlers ku support eyy aagalaa adhukumella andha impact player rule naala batting team bowlers ahh savadhichitaanga 🫠. Pitch should favour both batters and bowlers only then impact player rule should be allowed
Pdogg's playoffs format has a hole.
No.1 Team goes to Finals directly- *FAIR*
No.3 Team has to win two consecutive matches to enter Finals just like the current format- *FAIR*
No.4&No.5 Teams have to win 3 consecutive matches to enter Finals, since they are the last two teams- *FAIR*
No.2 Team has to win one match to enter Finals just like the current format *BUT* if they lose, they're out of the league which is *UNFAIR* . Then what's the point in finishing 2nd in a tournament where your qualifier match is also your eliminator match. They're at a disadvantage here when compared with current format in which they get 2 chances to qualify for Finals.
I think 5 team playoffs is great, but it has to be fine tuned.
Culture of cricket ❤
Great perspective about cricket, Just felt, PDogg mimicry of saloman papaiya was more like Mansoor ali khan actor 😂😂
that ending was the cherry on the top man, pdogg is why i watch these videos
Actually Ash was absolutely right. T20 to be considered a different game like a subset of cricket so we can introduce any Innovative thoughts and rules and also both team can use impact player right, so if a batsman come as impact, a bowler also come as impact right so there will equal chance for scoring runs or getting his wicket.
Impact player idea ash anna is right same innings la both batsman and bowler good competition will be equal and pdogg 5 team idea is perfect
24:09 Jailer movie reference 😂
3 things to mention
1. Impact player : either no impact player or to have impact player for both innings for a team (even I had similar idea, but with a small clause like the over num of introducing impact player for a team in a match should be same for both innings just to have more fun)
2. 5 teams to qualify similar to BBL, but playoffs like PGodd suggested is fine
3. Playoffs to be played in neutral venues, how many venues we have in India, which do not get an international match for years together, simple idea is we have 5 playoffs matches, one for each zone - north, east, west, south and Central, by doing this those smaller ground would get more attraction towards them and God revenue helping develop tourism as well. As this is going to be fixed even before start of the season transportation should be fine and there should be no complaints.
Ash/PGodd any thoughts on #3, maybe in your next video.. please share.. would feel happy...
Brilliant suggestion by pdogg. It makes it very interesting. Not quite but similar concept is adopted in NFL.
Ash & PDogg - Great discussion on Impact player. Good point by Prasanna. Alternatively - Why not have a system of having negative 5 runs (penalty point) say to an impact player choosing team or adding positive 5 runs for the opposite team when the other team choose for it. This is like creating a situation of level playing field for the other team choosing the 12th player. Will also form a pressure for the opting team or impact player to also demonstrate the trust and the penalty points. Just my view. Your views @Ashwin and @PDogg. Thanks
Hi..ash Anna ...Kamal dialogue..sami illae ne sollallai...irunda nalla irukkum....about impact player..
19:00 this is a good thought pdogg. Even if im not a big fan of your thoughts, but i support this k8nd of competitive ideas❤
Im against the concept of impact player rule because initially a team expects all of their payers to contribute equally and to their full extent. But now, the franchise expects extraodinary from the impact player and the value that the other players bring to the table is less considered.
This impact substitute cannot be compared with substitution of a football game becoz in football , even if a midfielder is substituted with a striker, the entire team goes into an attacking mode and thus it does not reduce the ability of the defender or any of the 11 players on the field to showcase his talent or to prove himself. Thus, in football , how many ever substitution are made, it gives an opportunity for all the players on the field to express himself completely and no player will have a feeling of less represented.
But in cricket, it become a senario that the entire team is revoling around the impact player and it restricts the talent of other players to be showcased. Ex- if a player in actual playing 11 can bowl 2 or 3 over in ipl standard, he is totally overshadowed by the impact player.
Cricket is not about dhoni coming at no5 and finishing the game and a ashwin coming and taking wicket it's all about ( bowler hitting four and a parttime bowler taking wicket and winning the game) ithuthanga cricket paaka nalla irukum
Pdoggs supersub concept is great.thought abt the same long ago.
Replace a player who haven't done any part with bat or ball
As usual great video Ash Anna :-) It would be awesome if you could make a video highlighting talented players who haven’t had the chance to prove themselves in the IPL yet. It could help other franchises keep an eye on them and potentially give them the opportunity they deserve.
PDogg seemed to keep getting back to the fact that it is not a playing eleven but a playing twelve, but had no reason why that was a bad thing. Another example of inflexible thought processes. I am amazed at Ashwin's clarity and foresight which is not usual for a long-term international player who generally get boxed into self preservation thinking. He is sure to be one of the great thinkers of the game after his playing days. And oh, a sport's endeavour should be to strive a balance between the two teams as much as possible i.e. Best bowling versus best batting team. Balance within a playing eleven is not a principle based on anything other than "oh it's always been this way". The sooner we get the best bowlers going up against the best batsmen the better for the game. Playing eleven or playing sixteen doesn't matter.
1 st place straight into Q1
Day 1- 2nd and 3rd will play Q1 Qualifier
Day 2- 4th and 5th will play E1
Day 3- Q1 -1st and Q1 Qualifier winner
Day 4- E2 - Q1 loser and E1 winner
Day 5 break
Day 6- Q2 - Q1 loser and E2 winner
Day 7- break
Day 8- Finals - Q1 winner vs Q2 winner
It gives more value to Table top team and 5 th place also get a chance and playoff gets more interesting
I agree with Ashwin should give 2 or more, my idea would be to have bowling side and batting side completely new like American football. This increases players pool more get benefited playing sport. More strategy plays in that way. Audience gets increased awareness and coach plays important role. I know it's a far fetch with current climate but hoping to happen one day. Immediately one suggestion would be to change the ball whenever bowler wants like 3 times in an innings so you can choose what ball like old new semi new according to batsmen and skill of the bowler plus pitch conditions which can even bat and ball
I think the problem is having two different team sheets based on the outcome of toss and the impact player rule together. Start with a playing xi and based on the progress of the game take your impact player from 4. The problem is not only in the rule, but the way the rule can be used innovatively by each team based on composition. What we saw was xii vs xii which took the interest away from the game.
Wanted to let you know guys... The happiness which i get when you release a video with Ashwin and pdpgg is nothing lesser than seeing a mother after 6 months long trip ❤️. You guys are such stress buster. Love you 3000 both of yoy
Well said. It is 100% sure