An idea just hit me while watching your video. If you are trying to find a theoretical equation that does not have a model yet, you can change the initial coefficients in the original equation when trying to find it's antiderivative.
Is there a simple ratio, rule of thumb that can exclude/confirm a linear trend line without visual graph wth error bars? An equation result that proves the problem if, for example result is >1 Just from the data in table?
I was thinking, maybe at 17:14, for finding k, shouldn't it be instead a linear regression through origin? I mean the intercept should be 0 right? since it is SA = k r²
i think radius square values are taken approximately upto first decimal like 0.81 becomes 0.8 in the first data etc. so it is distorting the straight line off the origin a little
I was wondering if you could provide a link to the sheet?
7:49 take that out of context and sounds compltely different xD
An idea just hit me while watching your video. If you are trying to find a theoretical equation that does not have a model yet, you can change the initial coefficients in the original equation when trying to find it's antiderivative.
please can you explain this?
Hello Mr. Thompson,
Would it be possible to cite/reference your video in a student report? Thank you kindly for your consideration.
Is there a simple ratio, rule of thumb that can exclude/confirm a linear trend line without visual graph wth error bars? An equation result that proves the problem if, for example result is >1 Just from the data in table?
I was thinking, maybe at 17:14, for finding k, shouldn't it be instead a linear regression through origin? I mean the intercept should be 0 right? since it is SA = k r²
i think radius square values are taken approximately upto first decimal like 0.81 becomes 0.8 in the first data etc. so it is distorting the straight line off the origin a little
how can i make equation to associate many variables with one output depending on them
Thank you! helped with my assignment
is above same as time series trend line?
Thanks :D great video :) very well explained
how the power of 1.9677 is assumed as 2? doesnt it need to be exact?
It was very useful. I have to appreiciate your effort. Just one thing to enrich my English: do we say radiuses or radii ?
radii
Either is good
I know I'm late for the party, but great video!
what is error bar?
I never expected u to say "unlinear"
And how do we do with nth root
plz tell me how to fitt a best non linear model in MATHEMATICA............................
U are god umma
thank you
tank you verrrrrrryyyyyyy much
12:13 a baby
lol