I was thinking, maybe at 17:14, for finding k, shouldn't it be instead a linear regression through origin? I mean the intercept should be 0 right? since it is SA = k r²
i think radius square values are taken approximately upto first decimal like 0.81 becomes 0.8 in the first data etc. so it is distorting the straight line off the origin a little
An idea just hit me while watching your video. If you are trying to find a theoretical equation that does not have a model yet, you can change the initial coefficients in the original equation when trying to find it's antiderivative.
Is there a simple ratio, rule of thumb that can exclude/confirm a linear trend line without visual graph wth error bars? An equation result that proves the problem if, for example result is >1 Just from the data in table?
Hello Mr. Thompson,
Would it be possible to cite/reference your video in a student report? Thank you kindly for your consideration.
I was wondering if you could provide a link to the sheet?
7:49 take that out of context and sounds compltely different xD
I was thinking, maybe at 17:14, for finding k, shouldn't it be instead a linear regression through origin? I mean the intercept should be 0 right? since it is SA = k r²
i think radius square values are taken approximately upto first decimal like 0.81 becomes 0.8 in the first data etc. so it is distorting the straight line off the origin a little
An idea just hit me while watching your video. If you are trying to find a theoretical equation that does not have a model yet, you can change the initial coefficients in the original equation when trying to find it's antiderivative.
please can you explain this?
Is there a simple ratio, rule of thumb that can exclude/confirm a linear trend line without visual graph wth error bars? An equation result that proves the problem if, for example result is >1 Just from the data in table?
how can i make equation to associate many variables with one output depending on them
is above same as time series trend line?
Thank you! helped with my assignment
Thanks :D great video :) very well explained
how the power of 1.9677 is assumed as 2? doesnt it need to be exact?
what is error bar?
It was very useful. I have to appreiciate your effort. Just one thing to enrich my English: do we say radiuses or radii ?
radii
Either is good
I never expected u to say "unlinear"
And how do we do with nth root
plz tell me how to fitt a best non linear model in MATHEMATICA............................
I know I'm late for the party, but great video!
U are god umma
thank you
tank you verrrrrrryyyyyyy much
12:13 a baby
lol