In the beginning you give examples of how the Greeks experienced magnetism in a mocking way, as if the ancients didn't know anything about electromagnetism. Following strictly the Pythagorean doctrine, Plato held that that gravitation was not merely a law of the magnetic attraction of lesser bodies to larger ones, but a magnetic repulsion of similars and attraction of dissimilars. The ancients were in fact well acquainted with the mutual attractions of iron and the lodestone, as well as with the positive and negative properties of electricity. Reading through the legends of the Well of Urdar, Thorr and his magnetic hammer and so on... and that battery technology was used in ancient times in Egypt and Mesopotamia long before the Olympian era I am wondering whether modern scientists have had access to the legends of our ancient ancestors before writing them off as simpletons.
Thank you! I believe Newton had a flawed theory, that Einstein flawed even more. Edward Leedskalnin did real science. He built the Coral Castle with no help and some of the stones weigh 30,000 lbs. He then duplicated it by moving it 10 miles. He built it on one of the corners of the Bermuda Triangle. He stated that Magnetism and gravity are of the same forces. Leedskalnin claimed to know the secrets of how the pyramids were built and as I said he built a monolithic structure to prove it. They exact day he did the heavy moving was when 4 planets aligned in 1910.
@@decoaisla Agreed. There is no doubt that every civilization grows on what has gone before - when the Ptolemaic dynasty ruled over Egypt the Greeks obtained their high culture from the Egyptians - and the Egyptians from the Atlanteans before them.
In 1968 the bit packing on 1/2" 9-track magnetic computer tape was so not-dense (256 bpi & 800 bpi) that we used to remove small bad "junk" pieces that got recorded not by simply using a "delete file" instruction but by running a round sealed stainless-steel & glass "hockey puck" filled with iron particles along the tape and you could clearly see the lines of bytes written & gaps between, then find the bad small piece & cut it out with like a surgeons razor knife & splice the magnetic computer tape back together with that bad bit removed. Those were the days.
My book, The Leedskalnin Codex (Top New Release in Physics of Gravity, Amazon) proves that the builder of the megalithic Coral Castle knew the secrets of magnetism, and used them to build the impossible megalithic structures of our ancestors. Only available on Amazon. Glad I ran into this.
Leedskalnin himself said that that he did it using hard work and the principles of leverage. The tools he used to quarry the rock are on display at the Coral Castle, and several old photos depict the large tripods, pulleys, and winches he used to move the blocks. Though the quarried stone slabs are large, they are actually lighter than they appear because the rock is porous.
@@Seek_Peace You sir, are insane. Please show me the source where he says that he did it using only hard work and the principles of leverage. You cant, because he never said that. No one, including you, can replicate what he was able to do with the same equipment. That stone weighs 125lbs. per square foot, holes and all. If it is so easy, then how come not a single person alive has ever been able to match his accomplishments? You just refuse to see the truth because it eats you up that there might be something in life someone else figured out first, and maybe, just maybe you don't know everything. I've studied this for 15 years, and I am the worlds foremost expert on the Coral Castle. You're a glib youtube know it all. Stand down.
@@UFOUAPMagnet Though Leedskalnin worked alone, he was not a reclusive hermit; he had friends who he saw often. One man, Orval Irwin, was not only a long-time friend of Leedskalnin's but also a building contractor with a deep knowledge of construction techniques. Irwin wrote a 1996 book with the inspiring title "Mr. Can't Is Dead! The Story of the Coral Castle," and in it he explains, through photographs, drawings, and schematics, how it was done. Irwin pours cold water on the paranormal theories that unknown energies, alien technology, or levitation built the castle. In fact, he finds such theories an insult to the hard work and integrity of his friend: "Back in the days when Ed started carving out his original stones," Irwin writes, "his was a generation who knew accomplishments by the sweat of the brow. It wasn't mysticism but hard work, this is how Ed really accomplished the massive project...."
@@UFOUAPMagnet you might also like to look up "Coral Castle Mystery 100% Solved with 1930's Film Footage!" Also check out "Wally Wallington" another amazing person
@@Seek_Peace Yes, I have already destroyed those BS arguments too. Anything else from the Museum of Lame Unscientific Nonsense you wanna drag out of the basement, or do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter...?
I'm not keen on that wildly-incorrect statement at 42:37 "what we are manipulating as far the electron goes is the charge on the electron". The charge on the electron is what it is and there's no "manipulating" it. In fact, what we are manipulating as far as electrons go is simply the QUANTITY of electrons that are flowing (not bound to nucleii in atoms or molecules).
If science doesn't like an initial idea they mock it, realise it's true and the rename it. For decades electricity and magnetism were researched and used medically until the pharma (and the business of "science") industry took over. These experts have done all they can to hinder development of new (old) ideas.
If the electrons are tiny magnets, why do they all want to line up in the same direction? When I put several magnets together side-by-side, they line up just opposite to this- north up, then north down, then north up, then north down.
That's actually because of quantum mechanics, particles minimize their energy by aligning their spin with their nearest neighbours, this effect is strong on small scale, but as you said, when a lot of small magnets are aligned the same way, they create a field that exerts a force that wants to align the electron the opposite way instead. This power balance is why magnetic materials are made of "domains" of a certain size, where all the spins are aligned one way. It's a power balance between magnetism and quantum effects.
Photovoltaic systems aren't transparent. The opposite, they have quite a "blackish" appearance. There's science for multi-layer photovoltaic systems that would have higher efficiency by permitting "light" of varying wavelengths to pass through or be absorbed by each layer (differing chemical compositions in each layer of course) but evidently it's "not ready for Prime Time" in terms of cost:performance else they'd be the ones on sale at their high efficiency rather than the 20%-22% efficiency of the ones advertised on-line. Why don't you study the topic and inform everybody something interesting instead of asking trite, lazy questions ?
you lost me when you said that the fingers in ferrofluid are due to magnetic lines of force. As you know, there are no "lines" of force, it is a field. "Lines" are only a way of counting the strength and direction. you can illustrate this easily by rotating or sliding the magnet. The spikes/fingers do not follow the movement. I'm typing this on my phone, so I do not have time or patience to type in an explanation for fingers.
You do know that there is a microphone in your phone so you can talk and it types the words you say for you..just saying... your excuse makes no sense unless you're microphone was broken... unless of course you have no service and have to hang out a Micky D's to use the internet...of it makes you feel any better I admit that I am an asshole that gets bored and try to get into arguments with strangers because I am newly single and I have been arguing with someone every single day for over 15yrs and it is not normal for me to not argue with someone at least 5 times a day about the stupidest things imaginable that literally has nothing to do with anything...so thank you for participating...by the way... I agree with you
Lines of force are like lines on a topological map. They have nothing to do with how magnetism works. They are an effect that is conditional on the relative strength of the magnetic field being examined, and the strength of the magnetic fields of the stuff making the lines, and the material used to suspend that stuff that has to keep the little bits apart but also allow them to move relative to each other and the main magnet. He did say Faraday came up with the idea in the early 1800's... Electricity was just being researched. And I'd bet Tesla working 19 hour days for decades did more than Faraday. He also magnetized things remotely without heating them. The term "lines of force" is misleading because there are no lines of magnetism, there are no forces that follow the lines that are fixed or behave along those lines based on the prime magnet alone. The only lines are magnets aligning N-S-N-S according to the spin or charge pairs seeking to minimize the distances between each other, electric not magnetic force... and then keeping the lines distinct due to the counter spin of neighboring lines. (that much is diamagnetic) Faraday's model of induction says a conductor cuts the lines of force. Using a metaphor to describe an impossible action... It's magic! Not science. Magnetism is (in these examples) all about negative charge movement. The magnetism is proportional to the collective current flow of the charges, (current as defined as the movement of charge) organized as single, dual, or domains of electrons trapped in the materials' crystal matrix. Charges that are swept into the flow of a dominant current will express magnetism that adds to that current. In a conductor, the charges are connected and have one charge value that can be quite large (say a car battery produces coils with 12 volts each)... so the magnetism in a coil of wires has a magnetic field with the profile of each loop. In a permanent magnet it has the profile of an electron pair. Those neoD magnets can have a current of 10K amperes... but 10**-27 volts (10 to the minus 27th power). Do that much current with the car battery and the wires melt. This is why CERN is so big, they use wires and need lots of coolant... not very bright those CERN dudes... but, blame it on the lines of force... try altering terrain by cutting the lines of elevation on a hill... Not as easy as it looks on paper. When the guiding current is turned off, after the magnet cooled under its influence, the aligned bits either start flipping in reaction to each other, or they are trapped in position by the crystal matrix. Basic Science has no clue what magnetism is... or should I say, no model for magnetism that takes it to the level of the mechanics of what is happening. BS has heuristic laws of magnetic behaviors. And as he said, the Earth's magnetic field is a complete mystery with this kind of base definition of what magnets do being described with words that no longer mean what their definitions are.... A functional model requires a medium, an Aether. But then electricity becomes a composite that can be created and destroyed... which has major economic and political problems. Plasmas can be accelerated fast enough to ionize... and then you have positive and negative charges... and complex magnetic fields that have different interactions with both the electrons and protons of atoms... And there is a type of magnetic field that is generated by the creation of plasma.. an impulse magnetic field which is what the Earth and stars do... and that can magnetise protons... which can give you clear magnetic materials and more. BTW, magnetizing glass has been done with a self-contained plasma reactor. You can build one for under $1K, but you better keep it on the down-low, if you do. Keep in mind that speaking seriously about Aether will get you discredited. So move on, nothing to see here... Pledge your alligiance to Business Science (BS). That's where the money is. Peace, B
One small clarification. Moving charges do not create magnetic fields. Those are only created by aligned charge particles... or seemingly by the expression of energy released by certain plasma reactions making charged particles. Go figure. B
Could nano particles be used in clear magnets?What about in a clear plastic bar with ( + ) charged particles in one side and ( - ) charged particles in the other with a resistant material in the middle?
I find it interesting you say oxygen seems to "hold on" to a magnetic field. I find that very interesting. Is that how our atmosphere clings to the earth? Tiamat mythos? And if cold has the potential to strengthen a magnetic field. By "tightening the magnetic field lines".. Then what role do the planets poles play on the Earth's magnetic field? Is the Arctic partially responsible for the strength of our magnetic field? Or is the Arctic a result of our magnetic field
No that makes no sense at all because Earth's atmosphere is 80% nitrogen and none of the matter floats away, not nitrogen, not rocks, not sand. "Gravity" clumps matter together by causing each matter particle to attract every other one and Albert Einstein thought that's because all particles of matter bend space around it. " Is the Arctic partially responsible for the strength of our magnetic field". All of Earth from the surface to core is "partially responsible for the strength of our magnetic field" so your question is meaningless. What the hell is with this moronic obsession with the 4.15% portion of Earth's surface north of 66.5 N ? "is the Arctic a result of our magnetic field". That doesn't even make any sense at all. "the Arctic" is just a phrase that humans arbitrarily attached to the portion of Earth's surface north of 66.5 N. What the hell is with this moronic obsession with the 4.15% portion of Earth's surface north of 66.5 N ? You need to study a bit rather than throwing out entirely-random notions without any thought or study.
We understand how strange magnets are; but they are actually a byproduct of spin. Do we have an understanding of spin? Or is magnetism simply a complex spins combination that so happens to generate these amazing forces.
Wow, snarky response. BTW we have almost no idea of the amazing relationship a particles spin and it's effect on others have. "spin" itself is misleading. He asked an honest question, don't be a prick.....plz..
I was surprised to learn I can re-magnetize my magnets if they've been demagnetized, by being rubbed with garlic for instance, by washing the garlic off with fresh goats blood. Cool.
Magnetism compressing+4-0-4+-decompressing expanding wavelets, shells or input+0/1-output quantized wave front's at right-angles to forward flow electric current contain much same information as before is same as wave fronts at right angles coming to a sea shore. Could this process of sending and receiving information between satellite's be same way Dolphins send and receive harmonic spherical compressions and expansions throughout the oceans? Only difference between liquid and plasma is Volume!
Love energy has constructive quality . Everything that wants to live need this quality of energy . It’s another thing what contains in it . Then we must learn ourselves as Informational Electromagnetic Structure as a biological object 🙏🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻
I have little knowledge about magnetism...But people are searching for free energy for decades. Wouldn't magnetism be a form of free energy? If yes, why not be used?
No. Magnetism is not a SOURCE of energy because the energy needed to be put in is more than the energy in the magnetic field (nothing is 100% efficient). Also, kinetic energy is easily converted to electrical energy by movement of an appropriate material through a magnetic field (that's exactly what an electrical generator is) but that's not a SOURCE of energy because energy is needed to MOVE the appropriate material through a magnetic field (that's exactly what a water-driven, super-heated-steam-driven or air-driven (wind turbine) generator is). The SOURCES of energy are nuclear fusion (such as Sun), nuclear fission (matter ----> energy), exothermic chemical reactions (such as "burning" things) and kinetic energy. There's no other SOURCE of energy whatsoever as far as is any use to humans (I haven't studied the current theories about "Black Holes"). Geothermal heat is ~50%/~50% nuclear fission & kinetic energies. The kinetic energy is the kinetic energy from 2 proto-planets that collided to form Earth & Moon 4,560,000,000 years ago (Earth inside is still cooling from that collision).
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 76 | คู่เอก "ผึ้งหลวง vs สมิงดำ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9SBshmGQOIM/mqdefault.jpg)
In the beginning you give examples of how the Greeks experienced magnetism in a mocking way, as if the ancients didn't know anything about electromagnetism. Following strictly the Pythagorean doctrine, Plato held that that gravitation was not merely a law of the magnetic attraction of lesser bodies to larger ones, but a magnetic repulsion of similars and attraction of dissimilars. The ancients were in fact well acquainted with the mutual attractions of iron and the lodestone, as well as with the positive and negative properties of electricity. Reading through the legends of the Well of Urdar, Thorr and his magnetic hammer and so on... and that battery technology was used in ancient times in Egypt and Mesopotamia long before the Olympian era I am wondering whether modern scientists have had access to the legends of our ancient ancestors before writing them off as simpletons.
Thank you! I believe Newton had a flawed theory, that Einstein flawed even more. Edward Leedskalnin did real science. He built the Coral Castle with no help and some of the stones weigh 30,000 lbs. He then duplicated it by moving it 10 miles. He built it on one of the corners of the Bermuda Triangle. He stated that Magnetism and gravity are of the same forces. Leedskalnin claimed to know the secrets of how the pyramids were built and as I said he built a monolithic structure to prove it. They exact day he did the heavy moving was when 4 planets aligned in 1910.
You should know Pythagorean doctrine is just a copy of Sumerian Knowledge.... Thousands years before Mr. Pitagoras
@@decoaisla Agreed. There is no doubt that every civilization grows on what has gone before - when the Ptolemaic dynasty ruled over Egypt the Greeks obtained their high culture from the Egyptians - and the Egyptians from the Atlanteans before them.
This is definitely near the top of my favorite TH-cam videos.
In 1968 the bit packing on 1/2" 9-track magnetic computer tape was so not-dense (256 bpi & 800 bpi) that we used to remove small bad "junk" pieces that got recorded not by simply using a "delete file" instruction but by running a round sealed stainless-steel & glass "hockey puck" filled with iron particles along the tape and you could clearly see the lines of bytes written & gaps between, then find the bad small piece & cut it out with like a surgeons razor knife & splice the magnetic computer tape back together with that bad bit removed. Those were the days.
Thanks
One minute I'm eating high iron snacks, next minute I'm here
My book, The Leedskalnin Codex (Top New Release in Physics of Gravity, Amazon) proves that the builder of the megalithic Coral Castle knew the secrets of magnetism, and used them to build the impossible megalithic structures of our ancestors. Only available on Amazon. Glad I ran into this.
Leedskalnin himself said that that he did it using hard work and the principles of leverage. The tools he used to quarry the rock are on display at the Coral Castle, and several old photos depict the large tripods, pulleys, and winches he used to move the blocks. Though the quarried stone slabs are large, they are actually lighter than they appear because the rock is porous.
@@Seek_Peace You sir, are insane. Please show me the source where he says that he did it using only hard work and the principles of leverage. You cant, because he never said that. No one, including you, can replicate what he was able to do with the same equipment. That stone weighs 125lbs. per square foot, holes and all. If it is so easy, then how come not a single person alive has ever been able to match his accomplishments? You just refuse to see the truth because it eats you up that there might be something in life someone else figured out first, and maybe, just maybe you don't know everything. I've studied this for 15 years, and I am the worlds foremost expert on the Coral Castle. You're a glib youtube know it all. Stand down.
@@UFOUAPMagnet Though Leedskalnin worked alone, he was not a reclusive hermit; he had friends who he saw often. One man, Orval Irwin, was not only a long-time friend of Leedskalnin's but also a building contractor with a deep knowledge of construction techniques. Irwin wrote a 1996 book with the inspiring title "Mr. Can't Is Dead! The Story of the Coral Castle," and in it he explains, through photographs, drawings, and schematics, how it was done.
Irwin pours cold water on the paranormal theories that unknown energies, alien technology, or levitation built the castle. In fact, he finds such theories an insult to the hard work and integrity of his friend: "Back in the days when Ed started carving out his original stones," Irwin writes, "his was a generation who knew accomplishments by the sweat of the brow. It wasn't mysticism but hard work, this is how Ed really accomplished the massive project...."
@@UFOUAPMagnet you might also like to look up "Coral Castle Mystery 100% Solved with 1930's Film Footage!" Also check out "Wally Wallington" another amazing person
@@Seek_Peace Yes, I have already destroyed those BS arguments too. Anything else from the Museum of Lame Unscientific Nonsense you wanna drag out of the basement, or do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter...?
A really good (and funny) talk. Knew most of the things of the first half, but learned a lot in the second half.
“Water, Fire, Air and dirt. Now I know how magnets work.” - Shaggy 2 Dope
What are the opposites? I belief that water and air and then fire and dirt. Do you conquere?
The 5 essential elements of the Universe Water, Fire, Air, Earth and Pizza. Satisfies all the needs of all Life.
I'm not keen on that wildly-incorrect statement at 42:37 "what we are manipulating as far the electron goes is the charge on the electron". The charge on the electron is what it is and there's no "manipulating" it. In fact, what we are manipulating as far as electrons go is simply the QUANTITY of electrons that are flowing (not bound to nucleii in atoms or molecules).
If science doesn't like an initial idea they mock it, realise it's true and the rename it. For decades electricity and magnetism were researched and used medically until the pharma (and the business of "science") industry took over.
These experts have done all they can to hinder development of new (old) ideas.
If the electrons are tiny magnets, why do they all want to line up in the same direction? When I put several magnets together side-by-side, they line up just opposite to this- north up, then north down, then north up, then north down.
Because opposites attract...I'm just messing with you...are you going to pass that bong yet or what...it's not a damn microphone
It might be because the magnetic field they are in is stronger then the magnetic field they create
That's actually because of quantum mechanics, particles minimize their energy by aligning their spin with their nearest neighbours, this effect is strong on small scale, but as you said, when a lot of small magnets are aligned the same way, they create a field that exerts a force that wants to align the electron the opposite way instead. This power balance is why magnetic materials are made of "domains" of a certain size, where all the spins are aligned one way. It's a power balance between magnetism and quantum effects.
They r all dumb ass........ R-M-F........it all about money
Transparent materials tend not to be conductive? How then are they currently developing transparent photovoltaic systems?
Photovoltaic systems aren't transparent. The opposite, they have quite a "blackish" appearance. There's science for multi-layer photovoltaic systems that would have higher efficiency by permitting "light" of varying wavelengths to pass through or be absorbed by each layer (differing chemical compositions in each layer of course) but evidently it's "not ready for Prime Time" in terms of cost:performance else they'd be the ones on sale at their high efficiency rather than the 20%-22% efficiency of the ones advertised on-line. Why don't you study the topic and inform everybody something interesting instead of asking trite, lazy questions ?
you lost me when you said that the fingers in ferrofluid are due to magnetic lines of force. As you know, there are no "lines" of force, it is a field. "Lines" are only a way of counting the strength and direction. you can illustrate this easily by rotating or sliding the magnet. The spikes/fingers do not follow the movement.
I'm typing this on my phone, so I do not have time or patience to type in an explanation for fingers.
Steve Greenfield they do comes in lines in the field
You do know that there is a microphone in your phone so you can talk and it types the words you say for you..just saying... your excuse makes no sense unless you're microphone was broken... unless of course you have no service and have to hang out a Micky D's to use the internet...of it makes you feel any better I admit that I am an asshole that gets bored and try to get into arguments with strangers because I am newly single and I have been arguing with someone every single day for over 15yrs and it is not normal for me to not argue with someone at least 5 times a day about the stupidest things imaginable that literally has nothing to do with anything...so thank you for participating...by the way... I agree with you
!
Lines of force are like lines on a topological map. They have nothing to do with how magnetism works. They are an effect that is conditional on the relative strength of the magnetic field being examined, and the strength of the magnetic fields of the stuff making the lines, and the material used to suspend that stuff that has to keep the little bits apart but also allow them to move relative to each other and the main magnet. He did say Faraday came up with the idea in the early 1800's... Electricity was just being researched. And I'd bet Tesla working 19 hour days for decades did more than Faraday. He also magnetized things remotely without heating them.
The term "lines of force" is misleading because there are no lines of magnetism, there are no forces that follow the lines that are fixed or behave along those lines based on the prime magnet alone. The only lines are magnets aligning N-S-N-S according to the spin or charge pairs seeking to minimize the distances between each other, electric not magnetic force... and then keeping the lines distinct due to the counter spin of neighboring lines. (that much is diamagnetic) Faraday's model of induction says a conductor cuts the lines of force. Using a metaphor to describe an impossible action... It's magic! Not science.
Magnetism is (in these examples) all about negative charge movement. The magnetism is proportional to the collective current flow of the charges, (current as defined as the movement of charge) organized as single, dual, or domains of electrons trapped in the materials' crystal matrix. Charges that are swept into the flow of a dominant current will express magnetism that adds to that current. In a conductor, the charges are connected and have one charge value that can be quite large (say a car battery produces coils with 12 volts each)... so the magnetism in a coil of wires has a magnetic field with the profile of each loop. In a permanent magnet it has the profile of an electron pair. Those neoD magnets can have a current of 10K amperes... but 10**-27 volts (10 to the minus 27th power). Do that much current with the car battery and the wires melt. This is why CERN is so big, they use wires and need lots of coolant... not very bright those CERN dudes... but, blame it on the lines of force... try altering terrain by cutting the lines of elevation on a hill... Not as easy as it looks on paper. When the guiding current is turned off, after the magnet cooled under its influence, the aligned bits either start flipping in reaction to each other, or they are trapped in position by the crystal matrix.
Basic Science has no clue what magnetism is... or should I say, no model for magnetism that takes it to the level of the mechanics of what is happening. BS has heuristic laws of magnetic behaviors. And as he said, the Earth's magnetic field is a complete mystery with this kind of base definition of what magnets do being described with words that no longer mean what their definitions are....
A functional model requires a medium, an Aether. But then electricity becomes a composite that can be created and destroyed... which has major economic and political problems.
Plasmas can be accelerated fast enough to ionize... and then you have positive and negative charges... and complex magnetic fields that have different interactions with both the electrons and protons of atoms... And there is a type of magnetic field that is generated by the creation of plasma.. an impulse magnetic field which is what the Earth and stars do... and that can magnetise protons... which can give you clear magnetic materials and more.
BTW, magnetizing glass has been done with a self-contained plasma reactor. You can build one for under $1K, but you better keep it on the down-low, if you do. Keep in mind that speaking seriously about Aether will get you discredited. So move on, nothing to see here... Pledge your alligiance to Business Science (BS). That's where the money is. Peace, B
One small clarification. Moving charges do not create magnetic fields. Those are only created by aligned charge particles... or seemingly by the expression of energy released by certain plasma reactions making charged particles. Go figure. B
The title is misleading... It was all old news...what was the surprise?
Sólo hay una cosa imposible de conocer. La naturaleza real del magnetismo. Y es, casi, lo único importante.
Could nano particles be used in clear magnets?What about in a clear plastic bar with ( + ) charged particles in one side and ( - ) charged particles in the other with a resistant material in the middle?
I find it interesting you say oxygen seems to "hold on" to a magnetic field. I find that very interesting. Is that how our atmosphere clings to the earth? Tiamat mythos?
And if cold has the potential to strengthen a magnetic field. By "tightening the magnetic field lines".. Then what role do the planets poles play on the Earth's magnetic field?
Is the Arctic partially responsible for the strength of our magnetic field? Or is the Arctic a result of our magnetic field
No that makes no sense at all because Earth's atmosphere is 80% nitrogen and none of the matter floats away, not nitrogen, not rocks, not sand. "Gravity" clumps matter together by causing each matter particle to attract every other one and Albert Einstein thought that's because all particles of matter bend space around it.
" Is the Arctic partially responsible for the strength of our magnetic field". All of Earth from the surface to core is "partially responsible for the strength of our magnetic field" so your question is meaningless. What the hell is with this moronic obsession with the 4.15% portion of Earth's surface north of 66.5 N ?
"is the Arctic a result of our magnetic field". That doesn't even make any sense at all. "the Arctic" is just a phrase that humans arbitrarily attached to the portion of Earth's surface north of 66.5 N. What the hell is with this moronic obsession with the 4.15% portion of Earth's surface north of 66.5 N ?
You need to study a bit rather than throwing out entirely-random notions without any thought or study.
@@grindupBaker Wow, see a therapist buddy?
We understand how strange magnets are; but they are actually a byproduct of spin.
Do we have an understanding of spin? Or is magnetism simply a complex spins combination that so happens to generate these amazing forces.
the direction of spin of nuclei and electrons. We know this stuff. Do some homework, plz.
Wow, snarky response. BTW we have almost no idea of the amazing relationship a particles spin and it's effect on others have. "spin" itself is misleading. He asked an honest question, don't be a prick.....plz..
I was surprised to learn I can re-magnetize my magnets if they've been demagnetized, by being rubbed with garlic for instance, by washing the garlic off with fresh goats blood. Cool.
Rodan ite BS
Magnetism compressing+4-0-4+-decompressing expanding wavelets, shells or input+0/1-output quantized wave front's at right-angles to forward flow electric current contain much same information as before is same as wave fronts at right angles coming to a sea shore.
Could this process of sending and receiving information between satellite's be same way Dolphins send and receive harmonic spherical compressions and expansions throughout the oceans?
Only difference between liquid and plasma is Volume!
Love energy has constructive quality . Everything that wants to live need this quality of energy . It’s another thing what contains in it . Then we must learn ourselves as Informational Electromagnetic Structure as a biological object 🙏🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻
What is a magnet? Not what it does but what it is. Anyone?
I have little knowledge about magnetism...But people are searching for free energy for decades. Wouldn't magnetism be a form of free energy? If yes, why not be used?
No. Magnetism is not a SOURCE of energy because the energy needed to be put in is more than the energy in the magnetic field (nothing is 100% efficient). Also, kinetic energy is easily converted to electrical energy by movement of an appropriate material through a magnetic field (that's exactly what an electrical generator is) but that's not a SOURCE of energy because energy is needed to MOVE the appropriate material through a magnetic field (that's exactly what a water-driven, super-heated-steam-driven or air-driven (wind turbine) generator is). The SOURCES of energy are nuclear fusion (such as Sun), nuclear fission (matter ----> energy), exothermic chemical reactions (such as "burning" things) and kinetic energy. There's no other SOURCE of energy whatsoever as far as is any use to humans (I haven't studied the current theories about "Black Holes"). Geothermal heat is ~50%/~50% nuclear fission & kinetic energies. The kinetic energy is the kinetic energy from 2 proto-planets that collided to form Earth & Moon 4,560,000,000 years ago (Earth inside is still cooling from that collision).
What does this man have a Ph.D in, I wanna do his line of research ;D
this clase elementary 9 grade school
To make a tattoo that will be used to control mankind,
I fell asleep after ten minutes