The Cobra really lives up to it's name, it appears out of nowhere, leaps at you, stings really bad and then vanishes into thin air... Oh, and is a fan favourite of the Australians.
Hey xin, love your content and love you bro. I tried watching your previous live stream with some guy from FAME clan ( more like FLAME....). They are two baffons who are so passive agressive and cringe and you dont deserve being treated that way, the way they speak and how low IQ jokes they have, unfunny group. When u played light for them and you were getting flamed by them * LeTs GeT XiN SoMe GuT CoNtEnT HaHhaHahahA * but made a crazy play and was responsible for taking out the only light in that game. Dude continue being who you are and please dont make content with guys like that who disrespect you to the fullest. Love from Serbia.
Again, same as your Bourrasque video where you used the experimental aiming unit. Your current setup isn't any better than with vents. Even if you had a fully upgraded experimental aiming unit it would be just about on par with bounty/bond vents.
Please stop spreading misinformation and just look it up your self, yea the aim time is pretty much the same with bond vents but with AIS you get another 0,015 accuracy wich does make a difference on tanks like these. Don't get me wrong I love vents but on a tank like cobra I simply don't care about having 415m VR instead of 400, or 25,5% camo instead of 24,7, or 1,5sek better reload time. All I care about is placing my shots.
Also cobra is one of the few exceptions where reducing aim time is actually relevant as the intra clip is so crazy short. So maxing out accuracy, dispersion and aim time all at once with this setup is actually extra valuable.
@@Terrorbrot Whilst you're correct that the difference is in favour of the experimental aiming unit you stated yourself that the difference in accuracy is 0.015, which I'd argue you give more credit than it's worth. The regular improved aiming unit has often been argued to be ineffective within the skilled part of the WoT community. Also as for your second point, no. The miniscule aim time improvement provided by the experimental aiming unit doesn't perceivably improve in between shot accuracy. For that you would be much better off using something like IRM or even a fire control system. This is because the reduced dispersion these pieces of equipment provide is far greater for your dispersion after firing, when firing in rapid succession and will actually be noticeable. So if you want to focus fully on consistently hitting your shots after firing I'd advise against experimental aiming unit. Pretty much any other equipment which reduces dispersion after firing will far exceed the benefits of +5% aim time.
![AMMO RACKS! ✅ 💣 | Best Streamers Moments #88 | WoT Highlights | [World of Tanks]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3JP9mTWA670/mqdefault.jpg)
The Cobra really lives up to it's name, it appears out of nowhere, leaps at you, stings really bad and then vanishes into thin air... Oh, and is a fan favourite of the Australians.
I really like your commentary always, I learn something new every battle I watch
These videos are getting me through exams, thank you!
I would use Bounty Rotation Mechanism instead of Accuracy Improvement.
The Thumbnail made me click this video😂 you are the G.O.A.T bro🎉
Oh man this thing is fair 😂
DZT has space protection armor instead of HE shells that's why tanks is makes special
I find it really hard to handle as it feels really sluggish. And ammo is kinda trollish. Its fun when it works tho i agree.
How do you get Cobra?
By getting Battle pass points, you need 28 in total
Do u ever tryied Console WoT?
how do we get those stickers which is at thumbnail? the mouth and bombs
Decals on customisation
you are a god at this game,gg
I hate when ppl clicking on the map and ask you to do something.
My Cobra is just a dust collector. I bloody HATE its gun behaviour
Hey xin, love your content and love you bro. I tried watching your previous live stream with some guy from FAME clan ( more like FLAME....). They are two baffons who are so passive agressive and cringe and you dont deserve being treated that way, the way they speak and how low IQ jokes they have, unfunny group. When u played light for them and you were getting flamed by them * LeTs GeT XiN SoMe GuT CoNtEnT HaHhaHahahA * but made a crazy play and was responsible for taking out the only light in that game. Dude continue being who you are and please dont make content with guys like that who disrespect you to the fullest. Love from Serbia.
Great stuff, but really bad camo choices ;)
L take, the camo is legendary
Again, same as your Bourrasque video where you used the experimental aiming unit. Your current setup isn't any better than with vents. Even if you had a fully upgraded experimental aiming unit it would be just about on par with bounty/bond vents.
Still appreciate your videos! But I do think this brings some necessary context.
Please stop spreading misinformation and just look it up your self, yea the aim time is pretty much the same with bond vents but with AIS you get another 0,015 accuracy wich does make a difference on tanks like these. Don't get me wrong I love vents but on a tank like cobra I simply don't care about having 415m VR instead of 400, or 25,5% camo instead of 24,7, or 1,5sek better reload time. All I care about is placing my shots.
Also cobra is one of the few exceptions where reducing aim time is actually relevant as the intra clip is so crazy short. So maxing out accuracy, dispersion and aim time all at once with this setup is actually extra valuable.
@@Terrorbrot Whilst you're correct that the difference is in favour of the experimental aiming unit you stated yourself that the difference in accuracy is 0.015, which I'd argue you give more credit than it's worth. The regular improved aiming unit has often been argued to be ineffective within the skilled part of the WoT community.
Also as for your second point, no. The miniscule aim time improvement provided by the experimental aiming unit doesn't perceivably improve in between shot accuracy. For that you would be much better off using something like IRM or even a fire control system. This is because the reduced dispersion these pieces of equipment provide is far greater for your dispersion after firing, when firing in rapid succession and will actually be noticeable.
So if you want to focus fully on consistently hitting your shots after firing I'd advise against experimental aiming unit. Pretty much any other equipment which reduces dispersion after firing will far exceed the benefits of +5% aim time.
@@Terrorbrot TLDR: My claim is somewhat wrong, but I completely disagree with your second comment.