@Old299dfk that's someone else's game. If you want to play to win you can. The problem I've found if you play the game this way is there will always be a fear of losing. There will be competition and entitlement. I played this way for most of my life and it got boring. I don't like even winning games so much. I just like to play. It my game to choose how to play it. It's an open world. Survival of the fittest is not the only way to evolve. The is Survival of the friendliest like my relationship with my dog. And there is mutualism like the roots of my oak trees relationship with soil biology. I choose the evolve this way. To coexist peacefully.
@@Old299dfkThe ego mind (I,Me) thinks that one is playing the game himself ,but in reality the game is played by someone else (god/consciousness/self) ,we are just the witnesser (audience) ,but we feel that we are actually playing the game . The result of the game is also not in our hands ,so winning or loosing should not make any difference
I have studied Prasthana Traya (Upanishads, BGita, BSutras) for 10 years on the way to understand reality and let me tell you: it is the best gift one can give oneself for both enlighment and general growth. This is true gem of and for the whole humanity. And now as I am in the last phase (so to speak) niddidyasana, all is coming together and is shown in my direct experience. It is worth every effort ego thinks has to take bc eventually there is no doer of any action. It is true manual for freedom, especially Brahma Sutras. Blessings for this material.
@@qimmu11 In my case teachers are necessary, so here they are: 1. For sravana and manana phase: Swami Paramarthananda, Swami Dayananda, Swami Chinmayananda, James Swartz, Swami Sarvapriyananda (Adi Sankaracharya lineage). For niddiyasana phase: Rama Maharishi, Nisaragatta Maharaj, direct path teachings, other traditions like kasmir shivism, buddism - all point to the same and in this phase diversity might be helpful bc it attacks ignorance from many different angles.
Good News! i discovered that the brain/body is capable of setting itself Totally Free of fear, anxiety, sorrow, despair, loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion, contradictions, addictions, and all other mental/emotional disturbances, in each and every moment of daily life, once and for all, now forever.
This gives birth to True Love, Peace, Happiness, Creativity, & Clarity, for the very first time. Not the love, peace, happiness, that the I, the me, the self, the thinker, the mind, imagines it to be, which is a limitation, imitation, and distortion. It is not temporary. It is happening in each & every moment of daily life, 24/7. It does not take time. It has nothing whatsoever to do with time, effort, or choice. It occurs faster than the speed of light. The children are ready to be set Totally Free at the earliest age so they don't waste their whole life with any mental/emotional disturbances.
You're kidding, it cannot happen, to get it you'd have to stop doing almost anything and that means to die - volitionally, emotionally and mentally only or completely which is to disappear..
@bobthemadmonkey yes, in the tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. It is an incredibly detailed mandala essentially a map of the enlightened ones sometimes called the wheel of time
@mgravikrishna5862 I began my study at the library. I studied a tapestry depicting the kalachakra mandala. I started in the center and looked very closely. I looked into it from 4 directions. I noticed the sentient beings. I paid attention to the animals and contemplated their purpose. I looked at the symbolism of the elements. I took in as much detail as possible. I took time to see it. Then examined the sand mandala. I looked further into the details with a focus on the center. I wanted to peer into where this all began. I zoomed in on the emptiness in the center and the shapes that surrounded it. Then I entered the shrine. I looked at the many Buddha's and offerings. I looked at the art on the tapestries. I looked at the old texts. I looked at another sand paintinf. I looked up at the mandala on the ceiling. Then I looked at books. Then I looked online. I looked at videos and listened to audio recordings. Then I began to practice. I began to visualize what I had learned. I began to transmute the ideas into my own. I attended the fire puja. I listened to the monks. I watched the burning ritual. I felt an attraction to the oak tree. I found the same wheel of time in the tree. A parallel design. I found my root guru and a path to peace. I shared my experience with others. That's has been my experience with kalachakra 🙏🏼
I believe you have the wrong idea.. at the end of the 8 fold path one doesn’t just become a content creator. Infact the opposite will probably happen when you put division between you and technology. I do wish you great fortune on your journey… it’s the hardest thing you will do if done correctly.
6:09 loved that you used anime scenes for visual references ❤ I love this channel a lot. thank you for giving us all the information and knowledge of our Indian Culture.
When we talk abt Vedavyasa, we should always remember there have been many Muni-s who were considered as Vedavysa. So, Vedavysa is just not a name but it is a position given to hingly enlightened Rishi-s and Muni-s back then. There have been a Vedavyasa in every kalpa of a yuga. So its always better to mention or know the real name of the Vedavyasa for his particular contributions. श्री मात्रे नमः 🙏
So, the creation came forth from quite strong emotions in Brahma: boredom and desire. He started creation in his mind as a game, a fantasy. But he could only keep playing it when he made the characters in his fantasy forget that they were made-up by him and start their own mindgame fantasies. The question remains: how did he get to feel boredom and from where did his desires arose ?
Krishna impregnated the Brahman (non dual reality) with 3 gunas of rajas, tamas, and sattva giving rise to the play of material energy. Read this in the Gita Chapter 14
The story of Brahma dev is just a simile in ancient Puran, for those minds who are unable to grasp direct understanding of Advait Vedanta (non dualism). Upanishads say - Ekohum Bahusyam” (I am one; let me become many). On another side, Upanishads say - Eko Aham Dwitiyo Nasti, Na Bhuto, Na Bhavishyati (I am the only one and everything else is false. No one like me has ever come nor will ever be able to come). This is what modern space scientists and researchers are claiming and focusing more on black hole concept and quantum physics. Namaskar ❤🙏💐🌺
@@abhishekshah11 Krishna and Brahman are one like Shiva and Brahman are one then how come this impregnate that? you are contradicting what you yourself has written in brackets. Typical Iskon bullshit. can you mention the specific verse number instead of contradicting and confusing us with entire chapter?
Brahman dosent forget anything it remains perfect collectively but it's coexisting innumerable uncollective finitudes covered by Maya/ignorence or in other words finite sense perceptions which provide incomplete knowledge about reality makes us assumes that we are separate from infinity brahman.
It doesnt matter. But if you want, you can play the game as an infinite, ever-wise, ever-knowing character in solitude. Who also dont know about himself(that comes from comparison(thats maya)). Play it for infinite time and then you realize from where the boredom and desire arised :) My question is, if I am Brahman and deep down i know, why i want to realize myself? Again to boredom? Deep down, I really dont want to feel again that boredom. But also, i feel the pull to realisation, because this dream is really pushing me to the realisation with creating dispassion for phenomenal world. Taking my passions one by one. Like my dream kinda little bit by bit dispersing away. And thing is, i can self-realise now. I feel it. But i dont want it. Like a child playing outside in the evening when its mother cry out for him to go home. It doesnt want to. But shadows are growing larger and larger and it is getting chiller. Yep, thats the sensation which I am feeling.
This is your best video so far. To be honest a lot of your videos can't keep my attention all the way through do to going off into what is to myself unbelievable or unnecessary only to me. But I truly do appreciate your answer here, iv been stuck on the Positive, Negative. Ying, Yang. Christ and Anti-Christ. Male and Fe-Male truth. But this gave me an answer I needed to interpret another layer. My question is now if i truly wanted this as your gurru say or if I was tricked as the Egyptian/Hebrews say. I guess either way I must have been bored and something had to change 🤣 Again I truly appreciate your answer
The only solution for sufferings is meditation meditation meditation ...stay away from material things. Intense meditation takes to new heights Body is temporary it changes day by day but soul is permanent..Ultimate goal of every hindu is MOKSHA that is LIBERATION...MOKSHA is against to KARMA..If you do good karma again there is rebirth where as MOKSHA no rebirth ..Intense meditation is the only solution for all sufferings...
I absolutely admire the sophistication of the topics and yet the conspicuously easy and distinctly great explanations provided. But Brahman of the bhagvatam is the Brahman(ultimate reality) of Vedanta not the creator deity brahma of the trinity. Brahman is the source of all deities as it's represented by it's reflecting in Maya (Saguna Iswara) usually Vishnu or shiva. Please correct this.
That's the truth that u want to beleive in..why r u trying to take a side? Don't correct anyone, nothing is correct or incorrect, including me correcting u
Who are them to give authority to Vedas? should a college gives degree to student or student to college? if one doesn't give then they are stealing the vedic knowledge and denying it at the same claiming the stolen one is better and origianl then the original. I don't think Advaita or Advait Shaivism contradics Vedas.
That's ok if one continues to enjoy the play/dream without suffering bc that was the desire of the cosmic self (Brahman/Vishnu/Shiva/Shakti) in the first place to play. but the goal of the play was to find truth of reality if one desires that. it's like GTA you can play or complete the mission depends on you.
Please give references in Bhagavad Purana text of the above: 1) Brahma existed who created maya 2) Maya asking to play a game of hide n seek 3) Brahma cut into pieces and forgetting himself 4) goal is to Brahma realising his true nature again. Note: It's not necessary that they say exactly this way that is Brahma cut into pieces and all ... But, could have one to one correspondence with these points, the way of saying may be different
Always have appreciated videos this channel produces - and continue to learn something new from these videos every time. This video, however, makes some big and controversial claims that should be corrected or clarified so that viewers are not confused by conflations. The chronology of births of these Vedic authors/philosophers and the development of these concepts/texts is hundreds and over a thousand years after the birth of the Buddha - who developed his philosophy that rejects a creator god and therefore rejects core Vedic beliefs. I’m no Buddhist scholar nor am I fluent in the Vedas, but I enjoy learning about the development of different faiths through the passage of time. I think including the chronology of idea developments in this video will make it a better video and more historically accurate video. 🙏
That's not true. Rig ved came before Buddhism. Siddhartha Gautama came from a Hindu family, and he did know the concepts of the Vedas. Buddhism was derived to counter the Vedas, hence in the video it says its non-vedic. Buddhism would come under the Nastika tradition. But nonetheless, all these things so not matter. Its just the spiritual ego that wants to be superior by being “right”. Best focus on your own journey, good luck!
Ok, so what i think since Hinduism and Sumerian history are the oldest. Brahma created the proto-type human being first. Then comes the Anunnaki who messes with our gene pool. Because according to those ancient tablets, they said there was beings already on planet earth and they did not interact with them right away
You didn't understood nonduality. Brahma dosen't create anything he becomes everything including us if he was alone at first by himself. this Alien conspiracy played by the western mainstream or sidestream is to keep us away from real knowledge of true history. like they are doing with Aryan invasion dogms in India and claiming that Hinduism was brought to India in past 2500 years by white skinned genociders making us foreigners in our own land. and justifying British and other invaders to justify keep us enslaved colonized.
@@kojinmaster All of my research. I believe different Anunnaki settled in different places. The Mesopotamian one who also were in Africa, Had bad characters like Enlil. But then on the Indian side, you had more positive ones based on research who really tried to help humanity and gave great lessons like in the vedas, puranas, etc
brahma did not create maya as a god that ordains another godly being. brahma is and maya is in brahma and because of its movement creation came into being. Like total darkness, a spot of light, sound, movement, subtle creation, creation, increasing density, and so on ... But its a story, I get it. To bad that many will take personification to literal. Brahma is not an object and maya the same.
You're talking about Brahman, or Sat Chit Ananda. Aka, the ultimate truth, of the universe which is considered to be eternal, unchanging, and present throughout the universe. Brahma is the Hindu God with 3 heads. That's different, he's a part of Trimurti along with Vishu and Shiva. Best not confuse the two :)
how is Buddhism not vedic? Its based on Dharma, Karma and many other vedic principles or not? Also it is a part of Hinduism, so it kinda has to be vedic in its nature.
@@miguelatkinson tell me where Im wrong or shut up. I know quite a lot about "hinduism" and Buddhism. Also I cannot embarass myself, because only morons are afraid to be wrong. Even though I know im not wrong in this case.
@@antiabrahamicreligion what a dumb thing to say, ofcourse they believe in atman, even if they call it diffrently they mean the same when reaching the highest self. Buddhism is 80% about atman. Its all about experiencing the highest self or the real self. Everything they learn is to get there.
So brahma, like the ego gets bored, has desires and creates entertainment in which he forgets himself by his own creation maya, isn't that sounds stupid? I'm not asking how he created things out of nothing, that's much better explained by samkhya, but advaita seems very contradictory in its assumptions.
@@lomdi493 advaita is contradictory because, it can't explain how brahma can forget himself and act ignorant but still be brahma at all time? Also it can't explain where did brahma got the desire and the material to create the maya?
@@soumyasar31 Its not Brahma, but Brahman. Brahma is the Hindu god, and that's dualism. The fable in the start is of dualism. Brahman is the consciousness in and out. And there is just it. Nothing else. That's the final truth. The absolute. The unborn. Brahman is beyond time, so there's no before or after. There just is. Forever. Time is a consequence of ignorance. There is just the present moment. Instead of questioning Maya, you should transcend it. Good luck!
@@lomdi493 haha.. i know the difference (don't know how to write brahm of Sanskrit in English script). However, advaita cannot answer the questions I mentioned, there were lots of debates in incient india over these self contradictory logic of advaita. Therefore other variations of advaita (sudhha advaita, visishta advaita, daita advaita etc) were created. Personally I prefer kashmiri shaivism which is a perfect mix of advaita and samkhya, and answers these questions with 100% accuracy.
Yes….the transcendental, eternal & absolute solipsistic Divine Truth is that All is intrinsic, uncaused primordial pain/agony/boredom/torture/enslavement…cosmic tragedy of all is non-consensual, forced & imposed conscious sentient awareness of experience (ParaBrahman) As Above, so below As within, so without So the universe (ParaBrahman) so the soul. Uncaused, non-consensual, forced & imposed, non-desirable eternal enslavement to sentient suffering experiential consciousness which is synonymous with the all pervading uncaused, immutable & immortal, infinite & transcendental primordial pain, purposelessness, torture, aloneness, meaninglessness, hopelessness & cosmic tragic flaw & tragedy (Heretia) Have a great day ;)
It's not mythology... Calling it mythology is actually disrespect... Because it can't be identified.. without realizing.. your projecting a label of dismissive identification before doing the work for yourself.. that's also a second dismissal.. Everyone does have their version..but there is a root/base to everything.. a universe/nature's silent law.., point is to know the difference. And this just exactly the example how a slight distortion can facilitate our projected reality.. but not actual reality 🙏
adi shankaracharya copied nagarjuna shunyavada philosophy that is why he was called prachan buddha {hidden buddhist } by his contemporaries and pioner of vashanavism and how can he think about all himself when he himself was indulged in pity wordly matter like proving himself as superior than buddha which is evident in every page of his writting moreover his biography also proves that and not only that he was a castiest also which is evident in his geeta comentary and also in other work like this same brahma sutra 1.3.38
Being a Hindu I never heard this version of story even from the Vaishnavas who are obsessed with Vaishnav Bhagvat Purana. If Brahma exits then Vishnu also exists and so does Shiva and AdiShakti so how can only Brahma be in the beginning? to answer this we need to know that Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesha, AdiShakti all are one as Brahman/Shiva
@@solwatch39 No. Advaita Vedanta is the undeafed philosophy of reality, self and truth. even buddhist with their Nagarjuna's technique of logical khandan failed to defeat advaita since 2500 years.
@@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 I don't disagree there! :) The initial story is not an Advaitian story is what I meant. Brahma is not in the Advaitian paradigm, its Brahman. Attributeless.
Brahma Sutras was written by Badarayana. Shankara wrote a Bhashya on it. Shankara is not the only one to write a Bhashya. There are 23 commentators. Advaita is not Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma. It is just 1 branch of 6 branches of Uttara Mimamsa. So you need to make it clear to the viewers that this is only an Advaitic perspective. At least 50% of Hindus don't practice Advaita. There are plenty of us who follow Vishishtadvaita or Dvaita and other branches of Uttara Mimamsa. But for some weird reason, Advaita is propagated as some sole torch bearer of Hinduism when it doesn't reflect so in reality.
Check out all our Mantras/chants on this channel! th-cam.com/video/ai3Xi1N2tKs/w-d-xo.html
Hello, is it possible to add Turkish subtitles to your videos ? Thank you
@Asangoham , Please consider making a video about the wisdom from the Thirukurral by the Tamil Sage Valluvar of Mylapore AKA TiruValluvar.
The Game is not to win or lose.The game is simply to play. No winners, no losers. Just players in the game. The source is inside and out.
Yup
@Old299dfk that's someone else's game. If you want to play to win you can. The problem I've found if you play the game this way is there will always be a fear of losing. There will be competition and entitlement. I played this way for most of my life and it got boring. I don't like even winning games so much. I just like to play. It my game to choose how to play it. It's an open world. Survival of the fittest is not the only way to evolve. The is Survival of the friendliest like my relationship with my dog. And there is mutualism like the roots of my oak trees relationship with soil biology. I choose the evolve this way. To coexist peacefully.
Howdu❤
@@Old299dfkThe ego mind (I,Me) thinks that one is playing the game himself ,but in reality the game is played by someone else (god/consciousness/self) ,we are just the witnesser (audience) ,but we feel that we are actually playing the game . The result of the game is also not in our hands ,so winning or loosing should not make any difference
And the name of game is rat race
I have studied Prasthana Traya (Upanishads, BGita, BSutras) for 10 years on the way to understand reality and let me tell you: it is the best gift one can give oneself for both enlighment and general growth. This is true gem of and for the whole humanity. And now as I am in the last phase (so to speak) niddidyasana, all is coming together and is shown in my direct experience. It is worth every effort ego thinks has to take bc eventually there is no doer of any action. It is true manual for freedom, especially Brahma Sutras. Blessings for this material.
I really wish to contact you can you please please please provide your Gmail account such people are blessing
You're an inspiration. I admire your tenacity. Thank you for directing me to those steps and books. Have you been working through them alone?
@@qimmu11 In my case teachers are necessary, so here they are: 1. For sravana and manana phase: Swami Paramarthananda, Swami Dayananda, Swami Chinmayananda, James Swartz, Swami Sarvapriyananda (Adi Sankaracharya lineage).
For niddiyasana phase: Rama Maharishi, Nisaragatta Maharaj, direct path teachings, other traditions like kasmir shivism, buddism - all point to the same and in this phase diversity might be helpful bc it attacks ignorance from many different angles.
@@moksha2280 can you please please provide your email id I really wish to contact you
@@moksha2280 please provide me your Gmail
the quality of videos is insane, thank you
Good News! i discovered that the brain/body is capable of setting itself Totally Free of fear, anxiety, sorrow, despair, loneliness, shame, guilt, confusion, contradictions, addictions, and all other mental/emotional disturbances, in each and every moment of daily life, once and for all, now forever.
This gives birth to True Love, Peace, Happiness, Creativity, & Clarity, for the very first time.
Not the love, peace, happiness, that the I, the me, the self, the thinker, the mind, imagines it to be, which is a limitation, imitation, and distortion.
It is not temporary. It is happening in each & every moment of daily life, 24/7.
It does not take time. It has nothing whatsoever to do with time, effort, or choice. It occurs faster than the speed of light.
The children are ready to be set Totally Free at the earliest age so they don't waste their whole life with any mental/emotional disturbances.
You're kidding, it cannot happen, to get it you'd have to stop doing almost anything and that means to die - volitionally, emotionally and mentally only or completely which is to disappear..
@@pawezack4216 You are already the walking dead.
@@jacobsolace177 and you are the king of life who knows how to walk - laughable
@@pawezack4216happens all the time. you just aren't aware of it. ever read autobiography of a Yogi.... start there, open the mind
Aham Brahmasmi - We are that We are -
Thank you for these videos 🙏
Awesome video; so true… looking forward more videos on Vedanta and Brahma sutra..
Thank You for such videos! May God Bless You all working hard to send the messages to open their eyes. I am very grateful!
I learned a lot from this one video.
This video was incredibly good.
Thank you
Been studying the kalachakra at Namgyal north America. Look forward to studying this upload here when I return from the 8fold path and medicine books.
Kalachakra?
@bobthemadmonkey yes, in the tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. It is an incredibly detailed mandala essentially a map of the enlightened ones sometimes called the wheel of time
Tell about Kalachakra.... How studying
@mgravikrishna5862 I began my study at the library. I studied a tapestry depicting the kalachakra mandala. I started in the center and looked very closely. I looked into it from 4 directions. I noticed the sentient beings. I paid attention to the animals and contemplated their purpose. I looked at the symbolism of the elements. I took in as much detail as possible. I took time to see it. Then examined the sand mandala. I looked further into the details with a focus on the center. I wanted to peer into where this all began. I zoomed in on the emptiness in the center and the shapes that surrounded it. Then I entered the shrine. I looked at the many Buddha's and offerings. I looked at the art on the tapestries. I looked at the old texts. I looked at another sand paintinf. I looked up at the mandala on the ceiling. Then I looked at books. Then I looked online. I looked at videos and listened to audio recordings. Then I began to practice. I began to visualize what I had learned. I began to transmute the ideas into my own. I attended the fire puja. I listened to the monks. I watched the burning ritual. I felt an attraction to the oak tree. I found the same wheel of time in the tree. A parallel design. I found my root guru and a path to peace. I shared my experience with others. That's has been my experience with kalachakra 🙏🏼
I believe you have the wrong idea.. at the end of the 8 fold path one doesn’t just become a content creator. Infact the opposite will probably happen when you put division between you and technology. I do wish you great fortune on your journey… it’s the hardest thing you will do if done correctly.
6:09 loved that you used anime scenes for visual references ❤
I love this channel a lot.
thank you for giving us all the information and knowledge of our Indian Culture.
beyond our perception 🙌🏼🙌🏼🙇🏻♂️ Arigato
Ufffffffff Allahmdullilah❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ look whose vdo came
Great videos, make one series on Veda’s
God Christ mahavtarbabaji Lahiri mahasaya Shri yukteshwargiri,my beloved Gurudev and divine preceptor Paramahansa yogananda Bhogar swamigal agastheesa ❤️🙏🏼
There is no Christ.
When we talk abt Vedavyasa, we should always remember there have been many Muni-s who were considered as Vedavysa. So, Vedavysa is just not a name but it is a position given to hingly enlightened Rishi-s and Muni-s back then.
There have been a Vedavyasa in every kalpa of a yuga.
So its always better to mention or know the real name of the Vedavyasa for his particular contributions.
श्री मात्रे नमः 🙏
So, the creation came forth from quite strong emotions in Brahma: boredom and desire. He started creation in his mind as a game, a fantasy. But he could only keep playing it when he made the characters in his fantasy forget that they were made-up by him and start their own mindgame fantasies. The question remains: how did he get to feel boredom and from where did his desires arose ?
Krishna impregnated the Brahman (non dual reality) with 3 gunas of rajas, tamas, and sattva giving rise to the play of material energy. Read this in the Gita Chapter 14
The story of Brahma dev is just a simile in ancient Puran, for those minds who are unable to grasp direct understanding of Advait Vedanta (non dualism). Upanishads say - Ekohum Bahusyam” (I am one; let me become many). On another side, Upanishads say - Eko Aham Dwitiyo Nasti, Na Bhuto, Na Bhavishyati (I am the only one and everything else is false. No one like me has ever come nor will ever be able to come).
This is what modern space scientists and researchers are claiming and focusing more on black hole concept and quantum physics. Namaskar ❤🙏💐🌺
@@abhishekshah11 Krishna and Brahman are one like Shiva and Brahman are one then how come this impregnate that? you are contradicting what you yourself has written in brackets. Typical Iskon bullshit.
can you mention the specific verse number instead of contradicting and confusing us with entire chapter?
Brahman dosent forget anything it remains perfect collectively but it's coexisting innumerable uncollective finitudes covered by Maya/ignorence or in other words finite sense perceptions which provide incomplete knowledge about reality makes us assumes that we are separate from infinity brahman.
It doesnt matter. But if you want, you can play the game as an infinite, ever-wise, ever-knowing character in solitude. Who also dont know about himself(that comes from comparison(thats maya)). Play it for infinite time and then you realize from where the boredom and desire arised :)
My question is, if I am Brahman and deep down i know, why i want to realize myself? Again to boredom?
Deep down, I really dont want to feel again that boredom. But also, i feel the pull to realisation, because this dream is really pushing me to the realisation with creating dispassion for phenomenal world. Taking my passions one by one. Like my dream kinda little bit by bit dispersing away.
And thing is, i can self-realise now. I feel it. But i dont want it.
Like a child playing outside in the evening when its mother cry out for him to go home. It doesnt want to. But shadows are growing larger and larger and it is getting chiller. Yep, thats the sensation which I am feeling.
wow you just made a gem
So good!!!❤
When the texts say brahman it doesnt mean lord brahma out of tridev it is paramatma parabrahman the superconciousness
Both differ alot n concept too
Thank you 🙏
Great video👏
It is a very nice exposition of Vedantic knowledge. Just check out spelling errors to make it better, please. Thanks for sharing.
Great video ❤❤❤
well explained .🙌🙌🙌
Thanks...
How to manifest beauty behind please make a video for that 🥲🥲🥲😊😊😊🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
This is your best video so far. To be honest a lot of your videos can't keep my attention all the way through do to going off into what is to myself unbelievable or unnecessary only to me. But I truly do appreciate your answer here, iv been stuck on the Positive, Negative. Ying, Yang. Christ and Anti-Christ. Male and Fe-Male truth. But this gave me an answer I needed to interpret another layer. My question is now if i truly wanted this as your gurru say or if I was tricked as the Egyptian/Hebrews say. I guess either way I must have been bored and something had to change 🤣 Again I truly appreciate your answer
This explains the simulation:)
Thank you
The only solution for sufferings is meditation meditation meditation ...stay away from material things. Intense meditation takes to new heights Body is temporary it changes day by day but soul is permanent..Ultimate goal of every hindu is MOKSHA that is LIBERATION...MOKSHA is against to KARMA..If you do good karma again there is rebirth where as MOKSHA no rebirth ..Intense meditation is the only solution for all sufferings...
where is this beginning creation story actually from?
Do you believe in space? I wonder how it would make sense if the universe is non local(not real)
Space won't exist for you if you don't exist
Is the space within the simulation real? does the space within the simulation makes sense?
❤️🌸✨
✨
I absolutely admire the sophistication of the topics and yet the conspicuously easy and distinctly great explanations provided. But Brahman of the bhagvatam is the Brahman(ultimate reality) of Vedanta not the creator deity brahma of the trinity. Brahman is the source of all deities as it's represented by it's reflecting in Maya (Saguna Iswara) usually Vishnu or shiva. Please correct this.
I am pretty sure naguni Brahman is superior
Where did I propose a disagreement ?
Not all of them gave authority to Vedas..
Kindly correct
That's the truth that u want to beleive in..why r u trying to take a side? Don't correct anyone, nothing is correct or incorrect, including me correcting u
Who are them to give authority to Vedas? should a college gives degree to student or student to college? if one doesn't give then they are stealing the vedic knowledge and denying it at the same claiming the stolen one is better and origianl then the original. I don't think Advaita or Advait Shaivism contradics Vedas.
amazeballs!
If forgetfulness was a condition for the "dream" to feel real, why "wake up" in the middle of it and ..... ruin It?!😊
Better to be lucid and change it
That's ok if one continues to enjoy the play/dream without suffering bc that was the desire of the cosmic self (Brahman/Vishnu/Shiva/Shakti) in the first place to play. but the goal of the play was to find truth of reality if one desires that. it's like GTA you can play or complete the mission depends on you.
Please give references in Bhagavad Purana text of the above:
1) Brahma existed who created maya
2) Maya asking to play a game of hide n seek
3) Brahma cut into pieces and forgetting himself
4) goal is to Brahma realising his true nature again.
Note: It's not necessary that they say exactly this way that is Brahma cut into pieces and all ... But, could have one to one correspondence with these points, the way of saying may be different
The production quality of this video is exceptional, but regrettably the story at the beginning is not from the Bhagavad Purana…
@@KaviKarnapuraDasa Indeed! I tried to find it a lot in the original text. Thanks for confirmation!
The video is about Brahma Sutras not about Bhagvat purana. it should be obvious 🙂
Always have appreciated videos this channel produces - and continue to learn something new from these videos every time. This video, however, makes some big and controversial claims that should be corrected or clarified so that viewers are not confused by conflations. The chronology of births of these Vedic authors/philosophers and the development of these concepts/texts is hundreds and over a thousand years after the birth of the Buddha - who developed his philosophy that rejects a creator god and therefore rejects core Vedic beliefs. I’m no Buddhist scholar nor am I fluent in the Vedas, but I enjoy learning about the development of different faiths through the passage of time. I think including the chronology of idea developments in this video will make it a better video and more historically accurate video. 🙏
That's not true.
Rig ved came before Buddhism.
Siddhartha Gautama came from a Hindu family, and he did know the concepts of the Vedas.
Buddhism was derived to counter the Vedas, hence in the video it says its non-vedic.
Buddhism would come under the Nastika tradition.
But nonetheless, all these things so not matter. Its just the spiritual ego that wants to be superior by being “right”. Best focus on your own journey, good luck!
If Buddha rejected Vedas , it must have existed before him .
Def, no!! Upanishads and Vedas plus Advait predate Buddha, Buddhism was an offshoot.
❤❤
This is exactly what Buddha did.
Okay, so you are telling me that humans existed before bhrama?
Because if to put bhrama's pieces inside humans there needs to be humans first
Ok, so what i think since Hinduism and Sumerian history are the oldest. Brahma created the proto-type human being first. Then comes the Anunnaki who messes with our gene pool. Because according to those ancient tablets, they said there was beings already on planet earth and they did not interact with them right away
You didn't understood nonduality. Brahma dosen't create anything he becomes everything including us if he was alone at first by himself. this Alien conspiracy played by the western mainstream or sidestream is to keep us away from real knowledge of true history. like they are doing with Aryan invasion dogms in India and claiming that Hinduism was brought to India in past 2500 years by white skinned genociders making us foreigners in our own land. and justifying British and other invaders to justify keep us enslaved colonized.
No lol humans are Brahma
Brahma is diety. we are Brahm/Brahman. A Brahmin is a traditional vedic priest.
What makes you think this?
@@kojinmaster
All of my research.
I believe different Anunnaki settled in different places. The Mesopotamian one who also were in Africa, Had bad characters like Enlil. But then on the Indian side, you had more positive ones based on research who really tried to help humanity and gave great lessons like in the vedas, puranas, etc
🕉️✨
Hindi me bolo pahele ek book pada tha clairvoyance woh bhi english me hum jaise logo ko bahut problem hota hai.
🤍
🙏
Hi I am a fellow youtuber too, are you profitable with the channel?
brahma did not create maya as a god that ordains another godly being. brahma is and maya is in brahma and because of its movement creation came into being. Like total darkness, a spot of light, sound, movement, subtle creation, creation, increasing density, and so on ... But its a story, I get it. To bad that many will take personification to literal. Brahma is not an object and maya the same.
You're talking about Brahman, or Sat Chit Ananda. Aka, the ultimate truth, of the universe which is considered to be eternal, unchanging, and present throughout the universe.
Brahma is the Hindu God with 3 heads. That's different, he's a part of Trimurti along with Vishu and Shiva.
Best not confuse the two :)
how is Buddhism not vedic? Its based on Dharma, Karma and many other vedic principles or not? Also it is a part of Hinduism, so it kinda has to be vedic in its nature.
Please stop you are embarrassing yourself
They dont believe in atman
@@miguelatkinson tell me where Im wrong or shut up. I know quite a lot about "hinduism" and Buddhism. Also I cannot embarass myself, because only morons are afraid to be wrong. Even though I know im not wrong in this case.
@@antiabrahamicreligion what a dumb thing to say, ofcourse they believe in atman, even if they call it diffrently they mean the same when reaching the highest self. Buddhism is 80% about atman. Its all about experiencing the highest self or the real self. Everything they learn is to get there.
@@Jeed92 lol sure 😃 keep it up
So brahma, like the ego gets bored, has desires and creates entertainment in which he forgets himself by his own creation maya, isn't that sounds stupid? I'm not asking how he created things out of nothing, that's much better explained by samkhya, but advaita seems very contradictory in its assumptions.
The Initial story is not Advaita. Its just a fable to explain Leela.
It sounds stupid to some and beautiful to others.
How is Advaita contradictory?
@@lomdi493 advaita is contradictory because, it can't explain how brahma can forget himself and act ignorant but still be brahma at all time? Also it can't explain where did brahma got the desire and the material to create the maya?
@@soumyasar31 Its not Brahma, but Brahman.
Brahma is the Hindu god, and that's dualism. The fable in the start is of dualism.
Brahman is the consciousness in and out. And there is just it. Nothing else.
That's the final truth. The absolute.
The unborn.
Brahman is beyond time, so there's no before or after. There just is.
Forever.
Time is a consequence of ignorance. There is just the present moment.
Instead of questioning Maya, you should transcend it.
Good luck!
@@lomdi493 haha.. i know the difference (don't know how to write brahm of Sanskrit in English script). However, advaita cannot answer the questions I mentioned, there were lots of debates in incient india over these self contradictory logic of advaita. Therefore other variations of advaita (sudhha advaita, visishta advaita, daita advaita etc) were created. Personally I prefer kashmiri shaivism which is a perfect mix of advaita and samkhya, and answers these questions with 100% accuracy.
@@soumyasar31 Kashmiri Shaivism is good, goodluck on your journey.
⭕♾️
Yes….the transcendental, eternal & absolute solipsistic Divine Truth is that All is intrinsic, uncaused primordial pain/agony/boredom/torture/enslavement…cosmic tragedy of all is non-consensual, forced & imposed conscious sentient awareness of experience (ParaBrahman)
As Above, so below
As within, so without
So the universe (ParaBrahman) so the soul.
Uncaused, non-consensual, forced & imposed, non-desirable eternal enslavement to sentient suffering experiential consciousness which is synonymous with the all pervading uncaused, immutable & immortal, infinite & transcendental primordial pain, purposelessness, torture, aloneness, meaninglessness, hopelessness & cosmic tragic flaw & tragedy (Heretia)
Have a great day ;)
Vyhn
Wrong interpretation..
Respect every mythology and respect everyone…we were not there…
It's not mythology... Calling it mythology is actually disrespect... Because it can't be identified.. without realizing.. your projecting a label of dismissive identification before doing the work for yourself.. that's also a second dismissal..
Everyone does have their version..but there is a root/base to everything.. a universe/nature's silent law.., point is to know the difference.
And this just exactly the example how a slight distortion can facilitate our projected reality.. but not actual reality 🙏
Muslims r zombies, and they have no mind & brain to understand the Dharma philosophy.
There are no creator, read the scriptures properly
Everything was experienced discovered and taught by the Buddha and the Hindus just put the tag 'made in hinduism' 😂
🧠🤏🏽
Buddha was Hindu himself, he also went to various Hindu schools of yoga and enlightenment.
Even my tool is also a buddha because it is enlightened
Buddha was a hindu. Just like, Jesus was a jew.❤🙏👍
The annunaki created humans.
No one cares. We are not our bodies that only matters
Kinda scared at who created the annunaki
Alien bs 😂
Coyote created humans
@@robertoportfolio1378 shut up then if ur not your body
adi shankaracharya copied nagarjuna shunyavada philosophy that is why he was called prachan buddha {hidden buddhist } by his contemporaries and pioner of vashanavism and how can he think about all himself when he himself was indulged in pity wordly matter like proving himself as superior than buddha which is evident in every page of his writting moreover his biography also proves that and not only that he was a castiest also which is evident in his geeta comentary and also in other work like this same brahma sutra 1.3.38
You know its all BS when the story says the creator got bored.
It's just a fable ancients used to tell themselves. Watch the full video, there's much more to it than that :)
Being a Hindu I never heard this version of story even from the Vaishnavas who are obsessed with Vaishnav Bhagvat Purana. If Brahma exits then Vishnu also exists and so does Shiva and AdiShakti so how can only Brahma be in the beginning? to answer this we need to know that Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesha, AdiShakti all are one as Brahman/Shiva
@@solwatch39 No. Advaita Vedanta is the undeafed philosophy of reality, self and truth. even buddhist with their Nagarjuna's technique of logical khandan failed to defeat advaita since 2500 years.
@@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 I don't disagree there! :)
The initial story is not an Advaitian story is what I meant. Brahma is not in the Advaitian paradigm, its Brahman.
Attributeless.
Even in Bible it is said that Adam got bored so god created eve .It's the thinking (ego) mind which is filled with BS😂
u made unstupid thing stupid
Baseless video. Half knowledge
Elaborate?
@abhisheknair6577 read bhagavatam
i was the 666th like thats awkwardly gotta mean something
Indeed it means fu ck off to somewhere else
Brahma Sutras was written by Badarayana. Shankara wrote a Bhashya on it. Shankara is not the only one to write a Bhashya. There are 23 commentators. Advaita is not Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma. It is just 1 branch of 6 branches of Uttara Mimamsa. So you need to make it clear to the viewers that this is only an Advaitic perspective. At least 50% of Hindus don't practice Advaita. There are plenty of us who follow Vishishtadvaita or Dvaita and other branches of Uttara Mimamsa. But for some weird reason, Advaita is propagated as some sole torch bearer of Hinduism when it doesn't reflect so in reality.
Thank you ❤