F/A-18F Super Hornet Recon vs SA-13 "Gopher" 9K35 Strela-10 SAM in Hollywood-Style or rather MACROSS-Style Enjoy an don't take it seriously, it's just entertainment :P Take two
It's like when Terminator from the future needed to buy a power supply at present time. Terminator enters a store: - "I need a new power supply." - "Sure sir, which type of power supply do you need?" - "Any nuclear will do."
@@AbDeRRaHiMX the rest dont tho, and as much as I love it the chernobog is a pain in the ass to get set up, press h, go round and hope you get in the right seat before you get blown up
@@untrust2033 never use chernobog in a fight if you are visible on radar, activate ghost organization and put it somewhere open so no barrier will stop ur lock on, as soon as you fire at a jet its trapped and cannot attack you unless its very close, as the missiles would hit it as soon as it stop going in circles, and even in circles it will still get hit after sometime, and i mean all jets even pyro, mk2 has 0 chance, also if u get lucky and become beast in that event, dont waste the chance get a chernobog and take out ur enemies
Not taking seriously but: 1. 0:13 You don't joke about things like that. Pilots know EXACTLY what they are doing. "You sure about that?" Nah, just trying out my military grid system on the fly! -_- 2. You are using the F/A-18 for reconnaissance purpose. WHY would you fly so low? All reconnaissance purpose hardware are built for high altitude surveillance. Why would you fly over enemy territory at such low altitude? 3. If the SAM is looking for target, it would emit radar, and THAT would show up on RWS (Radar Warning Receiver) on the F/A-18. 4. SAM at THAT close range? Good luck dodging that. 5. Assuming that they CAN dodge the SAM, here are couple of facts that are missing: - WHY are they using so low number of flares when they should have plenty more? - Maneuver such as going high and pulling down.. in linear fashion is NOT the way to defeat a SAM. - If it is a heat seeker, then the RWR would probably not indicate SAM since the system can't detect heat signature instead of radio wave - If it is a radar guided, then RWR would detect it (as shown on the RWR (or radar screen) as two targets. HOWEVER, that would mean they are not heat seekers, hence deploying flares would be pointless. They would have to deploy chaff with RADAR jammer being active for effective counter against the missile. - If it is semi-active radar, I don't think it would even use heat seeker to get a pitbull. To get a pitbull, the missile itself would also use radar in close proximity to the aircraft. This method is used for AAMRAM typically. So no point in using it in such a close encounter. Nor do I think the missile is semi active. *** Dropping fuel pod to lure heat seeker away? WTF! 6. KEY NOTE: MISSILE DO NOT CHASE A TARGET. THEY INTERCEPT a predetermined, predictable trajectory where the plane "would be" after a given amount of time. 7. Even if they could CHASE, the amount of time they chase for being such small missile, their fuel would run out. 8. Once a missile miss you, there is NO WAY it will come back to attack you. And there's more. The list goes on. As the video uploader said, enjoy it as it is, but if you are an avid military hardware geek, this would ruin your day. In that case, laugh it off like it was a joke.
+M1TGLIED Ah! I see. However that is still not enough to justify the other facts. I mean the entire scene is for those who want to feel "the need for speed and explosion." It's wrong in so many ways...
Surface to air missiles don't slam into the aircraft. They have proximity fuses that cause the missile to explode next to the aircraft, releasing shrapnel.
killajakez as you said they EXPLODE, the misile in this scene dont explode it just burst slugs like a shotgun in one direction, a misile explode realising material in all directions, also misiles doesnt have that much fuel and they usually fly faster than an aircraft and the good ones turns closer
A lot of SAM's are like that. F4 pilots in Vietnam described them as Telephone pole sized shotguns. But yes, It was a little unrealistic with how long it tracked and took to hit ect. In reality if the missile misses the first time, it's pretty much done.
the sad thing is that this is even "good" i saw once a american prop plane doing a cobra breaking all physic rules for killing a bf109. like inerthia suddently drops to 0 and the gravity goes between moon and jupiter in 10 seconds my heart skipped a beat that time
As a VAQ-140 maintainer...this is why we fly EA-18 Growlers...all SAM sites would've been, identified, jammed and destroyed before it even knew there was a jet in the sky.
@@janburda6749 cyberwarfare is still in development for optical/electro optical terminal guidance jamming. IR can be blinded, avoided and detected. These systems can't be jammed theoretically but threats from these sources can be minimized. As of now, optical missile systems aren't as common as heat seeking or radar detecting
@@carson3201 Well, I am still quite curious as to how a EW/SEAD would help the F-18 in the clip from being ambushed by a Strela-10 hidden in a forest.
@@janburda6749 just speaking generically, radar guided systems which are most common now would've been deemed useless. A set of flares would be enough to distract a IR sam from a strella.
Mr Brown The latest fighter jets don’t get detected by sams, they don’t need to fly that low for recon. SAMs are mach 8 now but don’t get a single hit these days.
Damn I love the scene where the fuselage splits and the occupants engage the ejection seat.. then the explosive bolts fire.. canopy separates, etc etc. A top notch example of something you will never ever see in real life unless you are the pilot that needs a new plane.
I know there are a LOT of errors and totally ridiculous things about this scene, BUUUUUUUUUUT, it does give the sense of the terror that a missile coming at you might cause to pilots.... plus, it's epic and super entertaining. You can't deny that!
Bravo, and thank you for pointing this out my good sir because I was thoroughly confused by this somewhat radical inspection, or critique if you must. I thought we were watching a scene from a "movie"; Yet, you would have thought these guys just discovered General James Holmes himself attemted to play this video for thousands of unsuspecting fighter pilots before their BFM! Lol... All I can say is, thank the Lord this wasn't a clip from the movie Tropic Thunder. 🤣
Gary powers history 2.0 . In the case of the film you are dead in very high probability if misile impacts plane. 5 seconds and transition to black and end of the film... ... ...
Everybody talking about the fuel while me here watching that missile just following and not hitting the target till the end of the scene finally, AND IT WASNT EVEN THE MISSLE😂😂😂
Virtually all anti-air missiles, whether fired by ground installation or by another aircraft, use annular blast fragmentation to destroy or damage their target. This is a more consistent and reliable way of hitting the target rather than relying on the missile making direct physical contact. The missile's warhead is ringed with metal rods that do the actual physical damage to the target when it detonates. Detonation, again, is by proximity, not by physical contact.
With that in mind, how realistic was the missile's detonation sequence here? I'm not talking about its trajectory or never-ending fuel supply or anything like that..... just specifically the impact. How realistic was it?
I know, right? It's because it's super smart. No, missiles are infinitely faster than planes, so when they miss they overshoot and then that's it. They run out of fuel and fall from the sky.
When I first watched this scene, I could overlook the missiles seeming to have an endless fuel supply, but the second missile continuing to function after striking the plane was completely unbelievable. It simply would've been too badly damaged to operate. This kind of ruined it for me. The rest of the movie was good, however.
Every movie is meant for a "gullible" audience then. There's no sound in space. F U STARWARS!!! DNA has a relative short lifespan. F U JURASSIC PARK!!! People in the middle ages had horrible teeth and knights were rapists. F U ALMOST EVERY KNIGHT MOVIE EVER!!! *sigh*
Can you explain to me what was happening here? The missile shot out projectiles, and did not strike the aircraft. Is this accurate? Proximity fuse? Please give me a SAM lesson, I can't find it online.
IAMGOD712007 Direct hits on fast maneuvering targets are very hard to achieve, so most air to air missiles and surface to air missiles (though not all) are equipped with some form of a proximity fuse. When the missile gets into its range, the proximity fuse detonates the missile and the shrapnel and blast from the missile are what achieve the kill. Now there are some SAMs and air to air missiles that require a direct kill, but this is considered by and large a less effective and less reliable method.
Круто. Оказывается, ракеты у 9К35 работают на антиматерии с медленной аннигиляцией, а система управления использует как минимум суперкомпьютер и несколько датчиков для различных длин электромагнитной волны. Иначе я не могу объяснить, как твердотопливная ракета может так долго летать за самолётом, причём с трудом удерживаясь по скорости у него в хвосте, но не отвлекаясь ни на какие противозенитные манёвры, ложные цели и препятствия. Повторюсь, это круто.
The Hornet is my favorite jet. Maybe not as fast as the Eagle but it's gonna sneak up on them MiGs real quiet like and gun them with a big gun. My neighbor is an old F-4 Phantom pilot. He saw a little action in Vietnam. I keep telling him to write a book. He had his share of close calls and narrow escapes from MiGs. These are my 3 favorite aviation books: - The Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman - Scream of Eagles by Robert Wilcox - Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
As a fighter pilot i can say this scene is pure fictional. Missiles typically do not “chase down” fighter jets as misrepresented in movies. An effective missile shot will have the missile reaching the aircraft with a much greater speed (like twice as fast). Once the motor burns out, the missile then glides to its target
Everyone with special knowledge will find movies silly when it crosses their expertise. I'm a chemist and the silliness that goes on in CSI😫 I don't doubt that nuclear plan workers cringe when watching The Simpsons.
I asked a Vietnam fighter pilot about this. Quote, "You cannot out run a SAM, but you can out maneuver it. So you out maneuver it until it runs out of fuel and falls back into the jungle." In this video they now have SAM's that never ran out of fuel??
Exactly, there is currently no known missile technology that can endure that long, and that high a G Force. In theory, a drone type craft "could" do this kind of maneuvering and endurance but only at subsonic, supersonic would make the drone waste fuel faster than a dunk flushing a bottle of gin. So dramatic trick, but far from real.
It depends on the maneuvers used to evade it, if you look at the comm trails behind the SAM it flanks around trying to intercept it, also it does depend on the missile, that model I believe is Russian so it uses over-powering speed to catch it's target, that I could be wrong on though.
SAM missiles chase your butt around, just like these are doing. They usually don't fly long enough to be able to catch the maneuvering plane. They run out of fuel...
umaxen01 So I guess it's easier for them to intercept the aircraft than following its butt around... less maneuvering, less fuel waste. If it's following the aircraft from behind, i think it would waste more fuel - more maneuvers to hit the target
***** Maybe, but if it's using over-powering speed, I guess that intercepting the aircraft is the easiest way to hit the target... but i don't know. I'm not an expert :)
Not only does the rocket motor never extinguish but it's also pulling 10-12 G's in the process................meanwhile disregarding all countermeasures. Fucking amazing SAM. Perhaps our military needs to consult hollywood on this amazing piece of technology!!!
Missile takes 3 seconds to close within 20 foot of the plane, that had a 30 second head start. Then proceeds to take 2 minutes to cover the remaining 20 feet.
Are you serious? Does that apply to torpedos too ? I don't know much about Russian SAM's or F/18's; however, the 1st thing I thought of, is why don't all of our combat aircraft have better defenses from ground to air missles?
Odwaga Talent doświadczenie a przede wszystkim wyszkolenie panowie i panie chylę czoło za waszą odwagę jak również Pochwalam za obsługę naziemną jestem z wami myśliwce
Dzięki za uznanie po prostu stwierdzam fakty,prawdą jest,że lotnictwo w armii to prestiż, zaszczyt, i moim skromnym zdaniem najbardziej elitarna formacja w każdym kraju,pozdrawiam Was bardzo serdecznie jak i również Waszych mechaników..... .
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W3D5 | Summer | ชี้ชะตา 16 ทีมสุดท้าย](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PabKlXzcK8c/mqdefault.jpg)
Ah yes. I remember this scene. The SAM with the never-ending fuel supply.
and the unrestricted seeker gimbal that NEVER lost sight of it's mark
and how the Newtonian laws of physics just don't apply to the turning circles for a Mach3+ missile!
And the 30-second ejection sequence.
It's like when Terminator from the future needed to buy a power supply at present time. Terminator enters a store:
- "I need a new power supply."
- "Sure sir, which type of power supply do you need?"
- "Any nuclear will do."
Movie name please?
2:10 This Missel are a fucking TIE Fighter
Thus is the fate of enemies of the EMPIRE...!!!
Yush, so You heard it too :P
hahahahshshsbdkkxjdbs alien technologie
Dying right now 😂😂😂
The same weapon system that caused Harrison Ford's plane "crash" probably...
I never knew that those missiles can refuel midflight.
🤣
Don't you know they run on Hollywoodium
@@nash-p while being made out of chinesium
Same way they never have to reload in gunfight scenes.
The 2nd missile was a refueling one.
Very smooth landing. And realistic. No need to eject.
agree it's just like a normal ryanair landing
Remember this video huh?
That missile has higher IQ than me.
real missile has higher IQ than author (producer). and real missile more
faster. in real pilot can dodge one time
Trump voter? Then .. yeah.
@@dsrutherford9197 Savage
Lol
The missile knows where it is, by knowing where it isn't
I just read that last missile was a Harvard graduate before enlisting in the Russian Air Force.
LMAOL- WELL ITS A DAMN SMART MF MISSILE
😂
Nice profile pic 😉
@@MlTGLIED who's?
@@MlTGLIED Thank you Dave
This is absolutely one of the BEST action scenes of all time. It really put your home theater Surroundsound system to work !!!
Did you know? What is this movie name?
I keep coming back to this because it's so intense and awesome.
*knock knock*
"who's there"
"it a me, SAM"
😂😂😂😂😂😃
Knock knock
Whos there
Its DEATH
That one is so bad that it is good again xD
Hahahha
Knock knock
Who's there
SAM
SAM who?
Surface to air missile
Oh shi..
missile with an infinity amount of fuel?
Hollywood
Powered by the hopes and dreams of the sovie....... I mean "mother Russia" ....
+Skuad Kore
Wtf are you talking about surface to air missiles can follow the target for at least 5 minutes .
+Skuad Kore Powered by the anger of the Serbs...
not with that kind of maneuverability. Once the seeker head loses lock on the target, there's no way for it to somehow do a 180 and lock on again.
Behind Enemy Lines was a pretty good movie.
This was like a train wreck
So many things were stupid or wrong but I just couldn't look away
Gave me a good laugh
1:28 some Star Wars sound effect.
Yeah😂
Tie fighter blaster noise
Брат. Ухади. Враг. Братан цел. Агон. Камадир. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита
Враг. Агон. Камадир. Никита. Ридвой. Камадир
Камадир. Ты. Сбитый камади. Укланяйся. От. Бою. Лечики укланяйся. От. Бою. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита. Никита
GTA 5 Players be like: just spin in circles lol
The way the missiles follow instead of going in a straight line and intercepting annoys me so much
Yup
@@untrust2033 chernobog missiles kinda intercept though
@@AbDeRRaHiMX the rest dont tho, and as much as I love it the chernobog is a pain in the ass to get set up, press h, go round and hope you get in the right seat before you get blown up
@@untrust2033 never use chernobog in a fight if you are visible on radar, activate ghost organization and put it somewhere open so no barrier will stop ur lock on, as soon as you fire at a jet its trapped and cannot attack you unless its very close, as the missiles would hit it as soon as it stop going in circles, and even in circles it will still get hit after sometime, and i mean all jets even pyro, mk2 has 0 chance, also if u get lucky and become beast in that event, dont waste the chance get a chernobog and take out ur enemies
Watching this after seeing the new top gun movie really makes you appreciate how well made it is.
Легендарный фильм: в тылу врага.
Ну и филм я не видел но очень заинтересовался филм классны
Not taking seriously but:
1. 0:13 You don't joke about things like that. Pilots know EXACTLY what they are doing. "You sure about that?" Nah, just trying out my military grid system on the fly! -_-
2. You are using the F/A-18 for reconnaissance purpose. WHY would you fly so low? All reconnaissance purpose hardware are built for high altitude surveillance. Why would you fly over enemy territory at such low altitude?
3. If the SAM is looking for target, it would emit radar, and THAT would show up on RWS (Radar Warning Receiver) on the F/A-18.
4. SAM at THAT close range? Good luck dodging that.
5. Assuming that they CAN dodge the SAM, here are couple of facts that are missing:
- WHY are they using so low number of flares when they should have plenty more?
- Maneuver such as going high and pulling down.. in linear fashion is NOT the way to defeat a SAM.
- If it is a heat seeker, then the RWR would probably not indicate SAM since the system can't detect heat signature instead of radio wave
- If it is a radar guided, then RWR would detect it (as shown on the RWR (or radar screen) as two targets. HOWEVER, that would mean they are not heat seekers, hence deploying flares would be pointless. They would have to deploy chaff with RADAR jammer being active for effective counter against the missile.
- If it is semi-active radar, I don't think it would even use heat seeker to get a pitbull. To get a pitbull, the missile itself would also use radar in close proximity to the aircraft. This method is used for AAMRAM typically. So no point in using it in such a close encounter. Nor do I think the missile is semi active.
*** Dropping fuel pod to lure heat seeker away? WTF!
6. KEY NOTE: MISSILE DO NOT CHASE A TARGET. THEY INTERCEPT a predetermined, predictable trajectory where the plane "would be" after a given amount of time.
7. Even if they could CHASE, the amount of time they chase for being such small missile, their fuel would run out.
8. Once a missile miss you, there is NO WAY it will come back to attack you.
And there's more. The list goes on. As the video uploader said, enjoy it as it is, but if you are an avid military hardware geek, this would ruin your day. In that case, laugh it off like it was a joke.
+максим серебров Can't read Russian. Anyone know what he said?
+mindsoulbody
he wrote:
"3. The radar could be turn on in the last moment, like in Serbia-incident"
+M1TGLIED Ah! I see. However that is still not enough to justify the other facts. I mean the entire scene is for those who want to feel "the need for speed and explosion." It's wrong in so many ways...
+максим серебров english please?
Amen
weird missile, fly subsonic has a lot of fuel, and has fucking shotgun instead of explosives
Surface to air missiles don't slam into the aircraft. They have proximity fuses that cause the missile to explode next to the aircraft, releasing shrapnel.
killajakez as you said they EXPLODE, the misile in this scene dont explode it just burst slugs like a shotgun in one direction, a misile explode realising material in all directions, also misiles doesnt have that much fuel and they usually fly faster than an aircraft and the good ones turns closer
Yes. Depends on what kind of missile. The new generation of post Soviet SAMs can turn pretty bad ass though.
A lot of SAM's are like that. F4 pilots in Vietnam described them as Telephone pole sized shotguns.
But yes, It was a little unrealistic with how long it tracked and took to hit ect. In reality if the missile misses the first time, it's pretty much done.
Foxtrop13 not all missiles are the same dumbass...
The missiles of 9K35 System in this film have more fuel than its in real life, lol
Atrás das linhas inimigas. Fui inspirado na história real na guerra da Bosnia. Gostei do filme. Valeu a recordação.
Yeah in order to prevent a genocide nato did a genocide and declared themselves as innocent civilian killers
Filme name?
Hollywood: _Makes a thrilling movie about the US military_
WT and DCS players: *_"And I took that personally"_*
the sad thing is that this is even "good"
i saw once a american prop plane doing a cobra breaking all physic rules for killing a bf109. like inerthia suddently drops to 0 and the gravity goes between moon and jupiter in 10 seconds
my heart skipped a beat that time
@G E T R E K T Is DCS worth all they money?
F18 D hornet
@@armyquite4348 F/A-18F Super Hornet
@@Fox2-Videos ohh hehehe
Non F18 hornet
F18 super hornet 💪💪
Ace Combat rules: If jinking right or left doesn't shake the missile, you're probably going to die anyways.
No its fly in circles till missile lock sounds stop.
True dat.
The GTA school of flying
OWNYOMAMA or use the mig-31 and go full-speed
Pasquale Caputi would work if the Mig could reach full speed instantly
This whole sequence is a joke.
As a VAQ-140 maintainer...this is why we fly EA-18 Growlers...all SAM sites would've been, identified, jammed and destroyed before it even knew there was a jet in the sky.
How does one jam an optical/IR missile system?
@@janburda6749 cyberwarfare is still in development for optical/electro optical terminal guidance jamming. IR can be blinded, avoided and detected. These systems can't be jammed theoretically but threats from these sources can be minimized. As of now, optical missile systems aren't as common as heat seeking or radar detecting
@@carson3201 Well, I am still quite curious as to how a EW/SEAD would help the F-18 in the clip from being ambushed by a Strela-10 hidden in a forest.
@@janburda6749 just speaking generically, radar guided systems which are most common now would've been deemed useless. A set of flares would be enough to distract a IR sam from a strella.
These fun days are over now.
Latest SAMS don't give you a chance to show acrobats. They just give u few seconds to exit the seat
Mr Brown The latest fighter jets don’t get detected by sams, they don’t need to fly that low for recon. SAMs are mach 8 now but don’t get a single hit these days.
@@TboneI989 No man even f117 Nighthawk got killed.
Sure there's developed aircrafts which can manoeuvering against Sam's such as f35
@@TboneI989 they got s400 Sam's grand son
Reinhard Gellen LoL F35 worst? That’s why most of the worlds governments are clamouring to buy them as quickly as possible right?
Damn I love the scene where the fuselage splits and the occupants engage the ejection seat.. then the explosive bolts fire.. canopy separates, etc etc. A top notch example of something you will never ever see in real life unless you are the pilot that needs a new plane.
i agree.
And the plane's IBM hard drive is burned....
Underrated.
@@liveandinstereo that too.
@@liveandinstereo to protect it’s secrets I gather
ya that was very detailed ...
Its Done in an Awesome way!!! 🔥🔥🔥
I know this took a lot of hardwork!!!
Damn, this is so intense. Love this part of the movie.
SAMs are way faster than jets, they would catch up with the Super Hornet very easily.
Naht my uncle sam
agreed... cuz SAM is the Surface to Air Missile which mean it must faster than the target to take it down. :)
Muhd Zikry You, sir, deserve a medal. here, have my like.
Can it catch what Starscream died as in dark of the moon?
+Luis Henrique faster they are for sure, is it more manouverable too?
I know there are a LOT of errors and totally ridiculous things about this scene, BUUUUUUUUUUT, it does give the sense of the terror that a missile coming at you might cause to pilots.... plus, it's epic and super entertaining. You can't deny that!
Bravo, and thank you for pointing this out my good sir because I was thoroughly confused by this somewhat radical inspection, or critique if you must.
I thought we were watching a scene from a "movie"; Yet, you would have thought these guys just discovered General James Holmes himself attemted to play this video for thousands of unsuspecting fighter pilots before their BFM! Lol... All I can say is, thank the Lord this wasn't a clip from the movie Tropic Thunder. 🤣
для всех поклонников индийского кино... 👏
@@CebastyanBoh..your the type of those guys who rise up at someones birthday party and have an never ending speech..
Gary powers history 2.0 . In the case of the film you are dead in very high probability if misile impacts plane. 5 seconds and transition to black and end of the film... ... ...
An awesome scene...I sometimes pull out the DVD just to watch that scene
0:25 as of now the IDEM camera doesn’t exist on an F/A-18F; there is however the SHARP recon pod.
When you Got a Opressor MK II on you.
When ur flying around and get a Chernobog lock and suddenly you got 5 op missiles on your tail.
MK II IAM SO FUCK
DELUXO HI
STROMBERG IM ARE ONE SHARK
Jet p99 lazer Hi,iam still alive to you 3.
no it's an APC with a SAM Battery
And you're flying with Bombushka xD
You're here lol
Pilot: I know some advanced maneuvers to shake this missile
*Slightly turns left*
The enemy: Wow, this guy knows some maneuvers
Family guy star wars episode
Wow haven't seen content like this in a long time!
Everybody talking about the fuel while me here watching that missile just following and not hitting the target till the end of the scene finally, AND IT WASNT EVEN THE MISSLE😂😂😂
Virtually all anti-air missiles, whether fired by ground installation or by another aircraft, use annular blast fragmentation to destroy or damage their target. This is a more consistent and reliable way of hitting the target rather than relying on the missile making direct physical contact.
The missile's warhead is ringed with metal rods that do the actual physical damage to the target when it detonates. Detonation, again, is by proximity, not by physical contact.
With that in mind, how realistic was the missile's detonation sequence here? I'm not talking about its trajectory or never-ending fuel supply or anything like that..... just specifically the impact. How realistic was it?
The reason why you first see the iron dome explosion and then the qassam/whatever
Как с мс 17
unless its the british Rapier
So what happened in the scene
They finally did it! They created a eternal energy!
I love that everyone here just became military aviation experts.
Ah yes, reminds me of missiles that never get off my ass in GTA dogfighting
That missile made Jericho missile made by Stark Industry, AI controlled by Ultron system 😂
No, it's THAAD SAM
That is a stupid-ass AI
i like the way how SAM slows down when it passed the plane and accelerates again
I know, right? It's because it's super smart. No, missiles are infinitely faster than planes, so when they miss they overshoot and then that's it. They run out of fuel and fall from the sky.
*Kamikaze*
@@timstich1052 how much faster than planes are they?
@@thegreatafrican3367 Missiles can go anywhere from Mach 2.5 to Mach 5.0 depending on the missile, the altitude, the temperature, and its weight
@@Nick-jl2yp Yeah, I recently came to know s 400 missiles go mach 15 afterlaunch
Gawd damn... That was a Nice produced video... !
Never knew a SAM could fly that long. It can't.
0:48 When you’re in 1st place in Mario Kart and someone fires a blue shell.
To your point. th-cam.com/video/-YRDtGM0lCw/w-d-xo.html
why not some mario kart music over this chase scene.
Future of war thunder
DCS now.
dixievfd55 haha yea
8.0 Ground Forces. The SA-2, SA-3, and SA-8 are all within the GF time-frame.
after the naval update i will not be suprized if they made a new tier for jets used today
Imagine we have to deal with these kind of bullshit. 4 missiles chasing you.
When I first watched this scene, I could overlook the missiles seeming to have an endless fuel supply, but the second missile continuing to function after striking the plane was completely unbelievable. It simply would've been too badly damaged to operate. This kind of ruined it for me. The rest of the movie was good, however.
One of the best aviation scenes ever made. You cut out the best bit though - time stands still before eject -
Radar-guided SAM on your six!
Drop flares! hehehehe
LOL
you deploy chaff for radar guided not flares
No one know what type of SAM was firing to you, So they dispense both chaff flares at the same time
Arapsaudi
indonesis
Thanks to Mover now every time i see this Rhino pulling such Gs with the external tanks all i can hear is "Maintenance is gonna be pissed"
Maintenance be like: "You did WHAAAT with the external tanks on?!?!?! REEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!"
yeah :)
U guys notice that the fuel supply of the Sam is never ending
I saw this movie when I was kid, still Like this moment
The solid rocket drive only burns for a maximum of 12-15 seconds, everything else is Hollywood.
depends. if it's two stages than it can be much longer. one short boost stage and one long, low thrust burn to keep the speed
SAMs fly at least at mach 3. This is meant for a gullible audience. Also, these were optical... so, there is no way the plane can survive.
Every movie is meant for a "gullible" audience then. There's no sound in space. F U STARWARS!!! DNA has a relative short lifespan. F U JURASSIC PARK!!! People in the middle ages had horrible teeth and knights were rapists. F U ALMOST EVERY KNIGHT MOVIE EVER!!! *sigh*
Can you explain to me what was happening here? The missile shot out projectiles, and did not strike the aircraft. Is this accurate? Proximity fuse? Please give me a SAM lesson, I can't find it online.
IAMGOD712007
Direct hits on fast maneuvering targets are very hard to achieve, so most air to air missiles and surface to air missiles (though not all) are equipped with some form of a proximity fuse. When the missile gets into its range, the proximity fuse detonates the missile and the shrapnel and blast from the missile are what achieve the kill. Now there are some SAMs and air to air missiles that require a direct kill, but this is considered by and large a less effective and less reliable method.
wich is the full speed of f18?
***** Yeaaaa... nobody understands that there's dozens of SAM systems out there.
The cool part that I will admit about this scene is the intensity.
Ah yes, a SAM with hundreds of kilometers of range… what poppycock
Nobody:
Oppressor Mk2 missiles: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN!
Круто. Оказывается, ракеты у 9К35 работают на антиматерии с медленной аннигиляцией, а система управления использует как минимум суперкомпьютер и несколько датчиков для различных длин электромагнитной волны. Иначе я не могу объяснить, как твердотопливная ракета может так долго летать за самолётом, причём с трудом удерживаясь по скорости у него в хвосте, но не отвлекаясь ни на какие противозенитные манёвры, ложные цели и препятствия. Повторюсь, это круто.
The Hornet is my favorite jet. Maybe not as fast as the Eagle but it's gonna sneak up on them MiGs real quiet like and gun them with a big gun.
My neighbor is an old F-4 Phantom pilot. He saw a little action in Vietnam. I keep telling him to write a book. He had his share of close calls and narrow escapes from MiGs.
These are my 3 favorite aviation books:
- The Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman
- Scream of Eagles by Robert Wilcox
- Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
Yo this looks veeerrryyyy realistic, the speed of the missile and the endless fuel
0:46 that sign saying "indicator" got me laughing for the whole video lmao
What about the missile with unlimited propellant? 😂😂
@@d.h.2509 Lol that's classic 😂
This is just a cutdown scene from “Behind enemy lines” if anyone was wondering
Hornet making dog fight with a never-end fuel missile. 😂
thanks for the help it help my every thing i need to install
As a fighter pilot i can say this scene is pure fictional.
Missiles typically do not “chase down” fighter jets as misrepresented in movies. An effective missile shot will have the missile reaching the aircraft with a much greater speed (like twice as fast). Once the motor burns out, the missile then glides to its target
movie name? @
@@ninopurceladze2209 Behind enemy lines
Hell yea
@@ninopurceladze2209 dude I found you in a comment I wouldn't think to find you lol
Everyone with special knowledge will find movies silly when it crosses their expertise. I'm a chemist and the silliness that goes on in CSI😫
I don't doubt that nuclear plan workers cringe when watching The Simpsons.
That SAM was more inteligent than George Bush.
That's not difficult.
And since when the fuck do you compare shitty politicians with good missiles? :D
That's right
if it were any smarter it would write a book.. and read it to you
Ana Paula You meant smart then Obama
I asked a Vietnam fighter pilot about this. Quote, "You cannot out run a SAM, but you can out maneuver it. So you out maneuver it until it runs out of fuel and falls back into the jungle."
In this video they now have SAM's that never ran out of fuel??
One of the most intense scenes in my opinion
the aircraft recon camera has a red light that goes on when recording starts LOL
The movement of the missile relative to its target is fundamentally wrong. Also, the rocket engine works for a really short time, measured in seconds.
Exactly, there is currently no known missile technology that can endure that long, and that high a G Force. In theory, a drone type craft "could" do this kind of maneuvering and endurance but only at subsonic, supersonic would make the drone waste fuel faster than a dunk flushing a bottle of gin. So dramatic trick, but far from real.
Filip Vidinovski oh sit back and enjoy it’s just TV
This is a true story, so they probably made the missile chase longer to add excitement to the movie.
Its powered by vodka. Made by papa Stalin.
F5Storm1 there is literally no missile on the planet that chases. Literally nons
This scene is amazing
great editing!
missiles don't chase after an aircraft, they intercept it.
It depends on the maneuvers used to evade it, if you look at the comm trails behind the SAM it flanks around trying to intercept it, also it does depend on the missile, that model I believe is Russian so it uses over-powering speed to catch it's target, that I could be wrong on though.
SAM missiles chase your butt around, just like these are doing. They usually don't fly long enough to be able to catch the maneuvering plane. They run out of fuel...
umaxen01 So I guess it's easier for them to intercept the aircraft than following its butt around... less maneuvering, less fuel waste. If it's following the aircraft from behind, i think it would waste more fuel - more maneuvers to hit the target
***** Maybe, but if it's using over-powering speed, I guess that intercepting the aircraft is the easiest way to hit the target... but i don't know. I'm not an expert :)
I'm not an expert either, but with the propulsion those SAMs use would work either way within a mile, maybe, I could be mistaken on the model.
Not only does the rocket motor never extinguish but it's also pulling 10-12 G's in the process................meanwhile disregarding all countermeasures. Fucking amazing SAM. Perhaps our military needs to consult hollywood on this amazing piece of technology!!!
The sams that can turn all day long and keep coming
Это просто короткометражка или отрывок из "полнометражный",
Как фильм называется???
Missile takes 3 seconds to close within 20 foot of the plane, that had a 30 second head start. Then proceeds to take 2 minutes to cover the remaining 20 feet.
they put the missile in Holywood mode
Imagine if S-400 or S-500 ?
it's a phase changing missile with quantum intrication, that's why his buddy cam so fast
Missile needs some footage & excitement before it blows itself up. Understandable
@Joe Barone Yea!! A Sam missile with a never ending fuel. Could have reached Mars.
I don’t care what anyone says, the Egress breakdown is awesome!!!!!!!!
How does this SAM system compare to older generation SAM systems? In particular how does the SA13 compare to the SA2 guideline?
ahhhh yesssss.... the magical missiles of movie fame - kinda like the guns - they never run out of ammo or gas
"Made in USA" .... "Destroyed in Yugoslavia"
I keep watching this to inspire me to play BF4 when I'm bored
A missile with this acceleration, AND flight time, would have no problem reaching the moon
"Uncle SAM does the best he can. You're in the army now..."
The "Made in USA" on the nose at the end got me
Realism 100
But more seriously, this is painful to watch after playing some DCS
*_Relatable 100_*
Yep, the fucking Sam always hits me
Finally!!!! man DCS players are a rare find. hmu
Uuh you play DCS :)
@@julietbravo nice
Pure phantasy, missiles never follow after they miss target
Are you serious? Does that apply to torpedos too ? I don't know much about Russian SAM's or F/18's; however, the 1st thing I thought of, is why don't all of our combat aircraft have better defenses from ground to air missles?
Anyone who passed through their first few training mission in DCS will lol at this.
FOR EVERYONE WHO SAID "A SAM IS MORE FAST THAN F-18", IT'S A FUCKING FILM
One of the best movies ever. For me it's right behind Top Gun and went to Owen Wilson's best performance movies
Movie name please?
Thats some serious GTA AA physics on that rocket.
Odwaga Talent doświadczenie a przede wszystkim wyszkolenie panowie i panie chylę czoło za waszą odwagę jak również Pochwalam za obsługę naziemną jestem z wami myśliwce
Dzięki za uznanie po prostu stwierdzam fakty,prawdą jest,że lotnictwo w armii to prestiż, zaszczyt, i moim skromnym zdaniem najbardziej elitarna formacja w każdym kraju,pozdrawiam Was bardzo serdecznie jak i również Waszych mechaników..... .
I like how at 1:20 the airplane starts to crab into the turn and you can see the moment the pilot steps on the ball to correct it!
It's from the movie "behind enemy lines'
Thank
Ah yes, that one time when mach 5+ missiles couldn't keep up with a mach 1.8 plane.
I like how this was posted when I was born........
1:51 like dat sound of the second tank hitting the ground
Owen Wilson is AWSOME in this movie” behind enemy lines”
What movie is this?