1969 triumph T120 Bonneville 650cc at Andy Tiernans

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @mfitzgerald130
    @mfitzgerald130 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lovely Art , when motor is sorted and wiring brought up to date becomes a light weight enjoyable ride . I've noticed with new and old riders on early models with large capacity machines they seem to forget a good mouthful of fuel for each piston on start up , a strong spark and a good mouthful of fuel and bang first second kick and that motor will happily start , one more point on start up particularly with a cold engine is , when your engine has just fired up do not let your engine strain because you have set your idle speed too low , keep 'warm up revs' to a steady idle speed , you can feel when your motor is at its own happy idle warmup speed , it's all about having even and smooth pressure pulses on the crankshaft, especially with older British machines.. twins ,triples in particular.

  • @philipbrackpool-bk1bm
    @philipbrackpool-bk1bm หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    67 to 69 triumphs were beautiful bikes.

  • @Lanes-Explorer5733
    @Lanes-Explorer5733 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very nice example of a beautiful machine.

  • @peter7624
    @peter7624 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nice bike. They sound almost as good as an A10.

  • @yettsoman4364
    @yettsoman4364 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The bird's wing badges were the best. TLS brake drove me nuts!😂

  • @Vanrides.
    @Vanrides. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bought a brand new bonny in Sept 69 for £395. Once it was sorted out by the factory in Feb 70 it was a brilliant bike. Did over 20,000 miles on the bike before parting company 2 years later. TUM66H, still out there somewhere.

  • @stevenandrews5724
    @stevenandrews5724 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Might be a 69 reg but thats a 68 spec bonnie lovely bike

  • @Dazsvintagestuff
    @Dazsvintagestuff หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree 100% about NGK plugs, I'm not a fan. In old stuff anyway.

  • @gado6438
    @gado6438 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had a 69 T120R. Not a comfortable bike and battery would die if you used the headlight. Easy to work on though.

  • @obi1kahnobee549
    @obi1kahnobee549 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    its a 68 not a 69 look at the front wheel and no exhaust balance pipe.

    • @timparish172
      @timparish172 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ‘68 model, but registered 1969 (G) by the looks

    • @obi1kahnobee549
      @obi1kahnobee549 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timparish172 the seat is not a 68 0r 69

  • @russturner1570
    @russturner1570 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Motor is 1970 or later, '66/68 seat ( no pillion grab rail ), '68 front brake & nave plate, exhaust system, tank & badges are '67/68, rear shocks no later than '68.Wrong speedo fitted.No oil pressure switch fitted so why is headlight oil warning light coming on.Tacho drive / cable incorrectly fitted. Frame could be anywhere from '66 to '69 ( not '70 ) so engine & frame numbers will not match.

  • @neilmcintosh1200
    @neilmcintosh1200 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Proper

  • @tonyball2791
    @tonyball2791 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I prefer the pre unique construction bonoville

    • @russturner1570
      @russturner1570 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      pre-unique??

    • @tonyball2791
      @tonyball2791 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russturner1570 pre-unit construction meant to say