Space Station Crew Welcomes World's First Commercial Cargo Craft
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- Aboard the International Space Station, Expedition 31 Flight Engineer Don Pettit of NASA, Flight Engineer Andre Kuipers of the European Space Agency and Flight Engineer Joe Acaba of NASA grappled and berthed the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft to the station's Harmony module May 25, 2012, marking a milestone in spaceflight history. Dragon became the first commercially developed space vehicle to be launched to the station to join Russian, European and Japanese resupply craft that service the complex while restoring a U.S. capability to deliver cargo to the orbital laboratory.
So happy to see history in the making! Great job SpaceX and NASA!
Thank you!
Congratulations to all that have worked so hard to get to this point.
I wish them all the best! :)
Many Congratulations to SpaceX on well done Prize. And thank you for opening the doors into the next stage of a never ending Story!!
I can't image this video ever gets old.
Yes Congrats to Spacex and their awesome spacecraft Dragon I have high hopes for the feature of spaceflight thanks to them.I wish them the best for their next launch as well as the ones to come :D
Amazing, thank you very much for all those awesome videos!
It must be fantastic for the astronauts to see with their eyes.
Man thats beautiful. The craft itself. And I wish we'd see how the astronauts operate the arm and such... so many cool buttons! lol
love it! I want to go to space!!
If not me then im sending my kid to space! lol
Consider this a victory for all of human kind.
Another artistically done info. piece. Brilliantly done. The video speaks for itself. Audio is not needed. Bravo to your film making. Stephen Spielberg must have trained you. Thanks.
That helped even more. You are a freaking one-man wikipedia.
Right on! Time is changing for the better. In some places at least.
The increased radiation in low Earth orbit means the camera pixels get damaged quickly. You're seeing ruined pixels, which is why the bright spots are completely motionless relative to the borders of the image, even with a shaky hand-held camera.
That's not what happened. The cosmic radiation in the orbital environment takes a toll on the image sensors in the cameras. So, the "stars" you're seeing are pixels that got blasted by radiation and are not permanently stuck on. They don't really show up in the bright shots, but you definitely see them in the dim and dark shots.
Also, in some shots, you can see pitting on the window glass, but mostly it's the sensor pixels.
There were no stars visible. Dragon was below ISS the whole time as it approached from below hence the only thing that *could* have been visible is Earth below, either in daylight or in darkness.
If by "mankind" you mean the extremely hardworking guys at SpaceX, NASA, ESA and all other people who worked their asses off to make this happen :)
fantastic views from up there.
more spaceships should have colored lights and strobe lights. makes it look a little more sci-fi =))
thanks for the great video of this historic event!
I had to try and play that theme simultaneously with this clip now.
Perfekt match lol :)
it certainly looks like it.. lol.
but no, it's called orbital sunset. and the white spots just remain because it's dust particles on the camera lens and there's still light inside the iss' cupola (from where this video was taken).
Well, thanks for the information comrade. Helped a bunch.
hooray! another milestone reached.
congrats
Amazing...what a great accomplishment!
Those are called hot pixels in the camera, genius. Radiation damage accumulated over time.
what is the dots all over the screen? radiation cought on the lens?
Amazing. 720p cameras on the ISS!
all the videos in 720p.. tyvm =)
Thats not the news that I've heard lately. Russian rockets have been exploding plenty.
But I dont really have enough data to talk about this. And I am too lazy to look it up, so I'm going to take your word for it. Thanks for your time!
That's most likely the sensor of the camera who got fried by highly charged particles that are common in space.
Why the starts don't move when the camera is shaking ?
camera noise. They are using high ISO on the video.
Stunning!
Why at 8:13 does it look like the dragon is superimposed upon stars. Im wondering if this is dead pixels but thats an awful lot of dead pixels for a NASA camera?
how come you see stars and clouds in the background at 07:00 and then 10 seconds later when the image changes the stars are still there but the clouds are not?
It's not anything flying pass it. It must be some of the hydraulics that are used to reposition the spacecraft on its intended path. All of that is part of the Guidance and Navigation Control subsystem.
In how many launches? From how many humans in orbit?
Lockheed Martin is going to have to rethink their pricing strategies now that small independent companies can accomplish the same tasks as them.
Awesome!
What is the launch/death-ratio of the countries?
I have the impression that USA has lauched way WAY more stuff in space, so even if the death toll is higher the FAIL-toll is lower.
Russia seems to be launching just really expensive fireworks all the time, do they succeed at all?
We miss the adventures of the space shuttles...sic...what times those...
It is because there is not enough light refracting off of it for our eyes to pick it up.
its one small flight for a dragon....one giant leap for mankind............beeeeeep
ok, I'm up for it
A Dragon in its natural habitat!
it is unbelievable
so Dragon can cloak? Cool!
Let's explore space instead of fighting each other.
Moonraker music plays in my head seeing this
Those aren't stars they're dead pixels. Need completely different exposure settings for the stars to show up.
Enter, the Dragon!
The first help themselves. Information and opportunities are many. No desire to tell well-known things.
Dragon does Fly
Yes :)
Amazing! You could almost reach out and touch it. Go Elon! Go SpaceX!
what was that in 8:13 ??????
funny how they edited a picture of stars into the background 07:54 its more confusing than neccesary :D
Enter the Dragon!
You're seeing dead pixels due to radiation damage. And a moving camera.
At the 10 minute mark the Dragon cloaked!
is it me or the station is flying fast around earth's orbit?
Weird, it looks like there's some sort of giant glowing orb in space that's being reflected off shiny metal surfaces. UFO?? What isn't NASA telling us?!??
What is happening at 9:45? Cloaking device?... or are there really *that many* dead pixels on the cameras they keep on the ISS it looks like stars?
nice vedeo
No, that's what you think. I believe we should take some things into consideration. That's all. Not too extreme. lol
10:10! WOW!
I'm waiting for the tin foil hat club to state that those specks on the windows of the Station are actually alien ships.
Only 4 astronauts (cosmontauts actually) died in Russian spaceships.
Their stuff follows the basic rule of engineering: Keep It Simple, Stupid. And is thus very hard to break.
Next up, hoverboards!
1 Lockheed Martin executive disliked this
Ok, so we dont know anything but we can still argue. I say Americans have done way more launches and put way more people in orbit.
And I say that per launch, USA leads in safety.
Russian rockets have failed all the time in current news.
And I base this on nothing, since I am too lazy to look it up.
Russian rocket most reliable in the world. The percentage of accidents is the lowest. Very efficient and cheap. Engineers in the Soviet Union were able to make good use of the laws of nature and do a simple technique that works like itself without unnecessary complex devices. Besides, there is a perfect workmanship of detail and production. The largest number of successful launch in the world is produced by Russian rockets from the Russians Cosmodromes. You are it asking?
If only NASA were capable of going back to their early days, when they and Russia were competing head to head...pity that is no longer the case. As things stand, NASA can't even figure out how to build a shuttle- and unlike Russia, NASA actually Had working shuttles!
i think you took that a little to harshly or i a not good at telling if people are sarcastic
Like anyone could be thick enough to believe this is fake.
Is that a face on the side of the SpaceXDragon at about 8:45 into clip? Kinda looks like Jesus!
He said twice now that he hates when people advertise his name on videos he likes comments on or shares, come on buddy. stop it.
jambob34, I give you my official youtube extremist conspiracy award number 1. You are now an official youtube scientist lol. I suggest next launch getting a pair of binoculars and looking up like thousands of other regular people did. You might be surprised. You can easily see both Dragon and the ISS flying overhead. A basic telescope is even better.
I'm lazy. I was hoping you would just fill me in.
Where is the space station crew?
R2D2 with wings
I'm reading a book on the history of medical experiments on black people right now. You should look it up. It's called 'Medical Apartheid' by Harriet A. Washington. Any suggestions?
ARE astronauts tongue tied??? I need some audio please
are not stars, are stains
Elon Musk is a genius...Paypal, SpaceX, Tesla Motors, Solar City
WTF???? WHY? HOW?
11:30 flash flash flash
14:07 that looks weird.
I think I saw my house.
i think, elon musk is the howard hughes of our time! good luck spacex.
it was difficult to capture that piece of junk
Why are the russians launching anything anymore? How many rockets must they blow up before people realise they dont know that they are doing?
Just give all space traffic to spaceX, make them huge. They deserve it.
How am I a hypocrite? First off, you have to know me to know if I have hypocritical tendencies. Second, I don't just surf the net. I read, buddy. And if you would do the same you would see the disadvantages, as well as the draws, to technological advancements. To each it's own. Tomato, too-motto. Your opinion you are surely entitled to.
KURTJMAC, Enough said.
4 guys are conspiracy theorists who, until now, doesn't believe that there are guys landed on the moon..
nope
Eh...Russian rockets very rarely fail. And I think not a single manned russian rocket has ever failed, the damage was always to the spacecraft itself, in the early days. US rockets fail many more times than russian rockets, because russian rockets are simpler, and built more solidly.
Who is launching this resupply module? Boeing? Lockheed? Virgin Airlines? Maybe its a Russian gangster???.. You use my trucks or you will sleepski with the herrings komradski LOL
lol
7:50 can you see Jesus?
But why would we? Whe all just want to listen to Lady Gaga, watch tv whole day, learn nothing and make complaints to God about our unfultfilled lifes. We are becoming parasites, without passion for changing anything. And passion for conquering new achievements?? Dont even think about!
I REALLY ADMIRE THOSE YOUNG PEOPLE WHO PARTICIPATED IN FALCON 9 MISSION!
Technology will be our un doing and subsequent downfall.
LULZ BRA THAS THE PRODUCT OF PREESTABLISHED PREJUDICES NOT TECHNOLOGY XD BUT NEWAY CHECK DIS SHIT "Three Christs of Ypsilanti" BY MILTON ROKEACH 5SRS INTERESTING IF U LIKE Medical Apartheid. Man, I can't type like that anymore. Also read "Von Braun: Dreamer of Space, Engineer of War" by Michael Neufeld, too. It's way more relevant to the history of astronautical engineering, and it's a great read if you're into the topic. In fact, it's hard to go wrong with biographies in general, brotherfriend.
LUL WELL I DO READ AND IF U WUD DO THE SAME U WUD NO HOW 2 USE TECHNOLOGY THEN U WUDN'T BREAK IT AND IT WUDN'T BE OUR DOWNFALL LULZ XDXDXD JUST EXPRESSING MY OPINION, BROTHERFRIEND U MUST B READING DA WRONG BOOKS