Fukushima’s Radioactive Contamination Three Years On

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 61

  • @viper3183
    @viper3183 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Ignoring all the arguments for and against nuclear power at the moment, here is some rough math to put things in perspective:
    The researcher gets upset at the 'decontaminated' area that still radiates at 0.65 uSv/h (0.65 millionths of a Sievert per hour),
    0.65 uSv/h is also 5.7 mSv/a (5.7 thousandths of a Sievert per year).
    For comparison:
    (mSv/a) = (Dose) = (Time you would need to spend in the 'decontaminated' area)
    0.36 = Eating one banana a day, every day = 3 weeks
    1 = Civilian exposure limit in the USA = 2 months
    2.2 = Maximum exposure rate desired by Japanese government = 4.5 months
    3 = Average background radiation you get just from being alive = 6 months
    5.7 = 'Decontaminated' area shown = 1 year
    20 = Full body CT Scan = 3.5 years
    50 = Occupational exposure limit in the USA = 8.7 years
    100 = Ten-year exposure limit before increased risk of cancer = 17.5 years
    Because of the way the human body processes radiation over time, the decontaminated area would have to radiate at least 11.4 uSv/h to be dangerous, and we're at less than 1 uSv/h.
    The More You Know

    • @rafikimusic
      @rafikimusic 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      that all another story if you eat some

    • @CShermanH
      @CShermanH 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      rafi:ki You won't eat any. There's already shitloads of Uranium in the ocean, many many orders of magnitude more radioactive material than what Fukushima has/will put out. Don't be scurred.

    • @rafikimusic
      @rafikimusic 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Sherman your point being ?

    • @CShermanH
      @CShermanH 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      rafi:ki
      My point is that if you're scared of the fish then you've been watching too much sensationalist news.

    • @rafikimusic
      @rafikimusic 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Sherman ok thank you for your insights

  • @hoosierhiver
    @hoosierhiver 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    After three years the reactor is still leaking, but no mention of that here. The Japanese government has been terribly irresponsible.

    • @CShermanH
      @CShermanH 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not really.

    • @hoosierhiver
      @hoosierhiver 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Sherman really, voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_07_06/TEPCO-still-cant-prevent-Fukushima-radioactive-water-from-leaking-into-soil-sea-5050/

    • @user-od4lu3oj9t
      @user-od4lu3oj9t 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "voice of russia" must be credible

    • @dvsaleios
      @dvsaleios 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hoosierhiver
      No, not really.

    • @CShermanH
      @CShermanH 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      hoosierhiver Guess what Russia has a lot of. Oil. Guess what competes with oil? Nuclear.

  • @freemandecker8584
    @freemandecker8584 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Who could have ever predicted such a thing could ever have happened."

  • @billiamc1969
    @billiamc1969 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    When governments change acceptable safety levels of contaminants to higher levels we should know that there are serious problems!!!

  • @MyCatFooed
    @MyCatFooed 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Absolutely excellent report!

  • @piajensen5591
    @piajensen5591 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this

  • @hiroshibell
    @hiroshibell 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The problem with safecast is that the measurements are not that thorough. As you can see they are taken in the air from a car driving down the road. This does not give a fully accurate picture of the contamination spread on the ground which can then spread into the ground, water, food and be kicked up by people walking.

  • @garryheywood1
    @garryheywood1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am here only to comment on another video presentation where comments have been disabled, the video in question was published by ctv santa cruz and is presented by Daniel Hirsh and if you are in any way interested in the Fukushima accident or the implications of what continued use of nuclear power holds for our future as a species, then I urge you to give his lecture some of your attention. This guy clearly knows what he is talking about, he has been maticulous with his research and he raises some serious issues we need to urgently address, the language he uses is refreshingly clear an easily understandable for the average viewer and he doesn't get bogged down with technical terms, again, I urge you to give it look - it will open your eyes to what is really going on within the nuclear industry and how it will ultimately effect all of us.

  • @skudzer1985
    @skudzer1985 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Fallout 4: Fukushima

    • @deathroman13
      @deathroman13 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That would make an interesting game.

  • @walterdewald267
    @walterdewald267 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks so scary seeing all these workers in the dust clouds, as the face masks don't prevent contamination. Some of the particles (size down to a single molecule) easily go trough.
    In addition, studies have shown that they easily penetrate the skin and sequester into the muscles.
    I could see a lot of bare skin in this video - so guess what happened.
    It is a good video - but fails to raise the alarm big time.
    This shows how dazzled and brainwashed we are by the nuclear industry and mass media, etc.
    Radioactivity is invisible and has no taste or smell, so we don't realize it and can be told lie after lie by the governing bodies (which are an outpost of the nuclear industry/banksters/secret government conglomerate (in the hands of a few).
    Fukushima is part of Agenda 21. As we people are totally unwilling to enter a third world war (i.e. being pushed into one), this is a good way to achieve the culling of 7 billion people.

  • @LANDSEAAIRCANADA
    @LANDSEAAIRCANADA 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @brucetheviking
    @brucetheviking 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    when do we stop eating Tuna and Salmon from the nthn pacific? i have already.

    • @rafikimusic
      @rafikimusic 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      same here

    • @CShermanH
      @CShermanH 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The same time you stop eating bananas, or going on airplanes, or living on the Earth's crust.

    • @skudzer1985
      @skudzer1985 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Farm-raised tuna is great if you're wanting something with more fat. Awesome for sushi and tuna steaks.

    • @brucetheviking
      @brucetheviking 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tasmanian farmed salmon is the only seafood i will eat for a while nothing from the nth hemisphere is truly safe now, if it ever was mercury and other heavy metals contamination in fish is rarely discussed.

    • @erosflayed7004
      @erosflayed7004 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately your mates may not have quit eating anything from the pacific and her mates and your childs mates and.....it ONLY gets worse per generation..

  • @A2Kaid
    @A2Kaid 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Business must be good for Safecast.

  • @TheHolioZ
    @TheHolioZ 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:53 HALF LIFE 3.0 CONFIRMED!

  • @jamesluck2969
    @jamesluck2969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to know how they calibrated their instruments, data isn't useful unless its accurate.
    Such as driving in a car, you are actually going faster then the probe can account for the radiation in the area. Especially with a pancake probe. It's a good idea just in practice not practical.

  • @DannieJensen
    @DannieJensen 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can I buy one of those cheap geiger counters??

    • @DannieJensen
      @DannieJensen 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cheap my ass ... it's 450 dollars and you have to build it yourself

    • @SetagayaObserver
      @SetagayaObserver 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can buy the bGeiger via Medcom (450$) or you can build your own via a Open Source
      for ca. 200$ but it is a lot of Work, a lot of Organization, all together ca. 15 Hours of work.
      But the bGeiger is okay for 450$, a "Inspector Extreme", which is similar, cost ca. 650-1.000$.
      I like this Documentary because it showed very well that we here in Japan do not give up,
      we will not left Fukushima alone and we go on to understand the Problem of the nuclear Complex,
      Radioactivity and Contamination!
      Tokyo: 0.085mcSv/hour on the Ground

    • @DannieJensen
      @DannieJensen 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** I'll concede that it is a very fine instrument.
      Where did you get that reading? The documentary clearly shows a safecast sticker being placed on a presumably fake Geiger counter, and it was 0.200 ... which is not really that important because 0.085 is terrifyingly high when a normal background should be 0.020.
      You cannot compare cesium from a nuclear reactor with potassium from a banana.

    • @SetagayaObserver
      @SetagayaObserver 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually Japan was and still is very low in Radiation,
      the US, the middle of the EU and many other Places
      have a much higher "Background Radiation",
      Pre-3/11 the average Level in Japan was under 1 "Milli-Sievert in a whole Year",
      on Kanto Plain it was ca. 0.065 "Micro-Sievert/ Hour (mcSv/h)
      but in the Mountains, where we have a lot of Rocks, the natural
      Background was higher!
      The Measurement we saw in this Documentary was ca. 0.210 mcSv/ hour,
      this is not dangerous "but" we can detect much higher Levels in specific Areas
      (like seen in this Docu)
      Geiger-Counter: the Net is full of DIY-Geiger Counter and it is easy to build a simple
      one for ca. 40-65$, a better one need at least a Pancake Device, Data Logger and
      USB Connection, this will be ca. 200$ & your Working Time!
      I like Geiger-Mueller Tubes because they are very robust,
      a Pancake Sonde is very sensitive to Radiation but also for a Damage!
      The next nuclear Accident will come for sure and imo. it is better
      to be Equipped and to know the Enemy!
      A good Geiger Counter is expensive but you can share him
      with your Friends and Family and than he is cheap!

  • @spankystone3428
    @spankystone3428 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    the tsunami broke the damn wall!! and the damn bed is dry! wtf! haha jk

  • @keeponpainting
    @keeponpainting 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So tell me again why we need nuclear power ?????

  • @oldskool83
    @oldskool83 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    And this is why you do not use this kinda stuff! solar is free and safe

  • @tokinheavycannabis4207
    @tokinheavycannabis4207 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    STEVE!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @avgfree21
    @avgfree21 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    just dump the bags on the moon

  • @canada.589
    @canada.589 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol