What prevented the Mongols from conquering India?-DOCUMENTARY
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2024
- In this thought-provoking video, we explore the historical factors that hindered the Mongol Empire's attempts to extend its dominion into the Indian subcontinent. From geographical challenges and military strategies to cultural and political dynamics, we unravel the complex web of circumstances that shaped this pivotal chapter in history. Whether you're a history enthusiast or simply curious about the world's past, this video offers fascinating insights into the fascinating clash between the Mongol Empire and India.
- บันเทิง
On the way the Mongols passed from ruderealis to sativa to indica. Once Chitral was reached... the desire to kill, no doubt, became resolutely less and less intense as they reached lndia. The lndians were accustomed, and though they would not attack first, they were determined to fight off invaders.
The terrain was completely different from the plains of Mongolia, China, Central Asia, Russia, Eastern Europe. Same reason why all their attempts to conquer Vietnam were disastrous.
Such a difficult terrain then how ghazni ghori taimur managed?
@@ALC0A021 I think the video covers the other big reasons why Genghis Khan didn't go further south. Genghis Khan had beaten the Khwarezmian army for good in the Battle of the Indus in 1221 and was settling affairs in modern day Afghanistan. But the Western Xia were not meeting its commitments to the Mongol Empire and Genghis Khan went right back to China with vengeance. This was a threat much closer to home.
@@ALC0A021it took their ancestors 3 centuries to reach the place from where they started the incursion
@@ALC0A021Bcoz during that time there were no big empires to stop them in India. All were small kingdoms.
@@ALC0A021learn some history
because ghazni and taimur were based nearer in central Asia nearer to south Asia and they could use the Khyber pass to go back and forth
Although mongols avoided conquering India for climatic reasons, Alexander's case is not hte same, the fact of the matter is, Alexander faced the most humiliating and bitter defeat in the hands of King Porus despite having more than twice the strength of soilders in number. Had even his horse killed and his life spared at the edge of the King Porus' javlin.
The ones who were documenting it decided not to write this down in the fear of death.
Here's the true account.
According to the Roman historian Marcus Justinus, the battle was savagely fought. Puru challenged Alexander, who charged him on horseback. In the ensuing duel, Alexander fell off his horse and was at the mercy of the Indian king’s spear (and this is where legend meets history) when Puru perhaps remembered his promise to his sister (probably a Trojan horse sent in by the Greeks).
He spared the Macedonian’s life, and Alexander’s bodyguards quickly carried off their king. The Greeks may claim victory but if Alexander’s troops were so badly mauled by the petty regional fiefdoms, how could they have crushed the comparatively stronger army of Puru ?
According to Budge, in the Battle of Hydaspes, the Indians destroyed the majority of Alexander’s cavalry. Realising that if he were to continue fighting he would be completely ruined, the Macedonian requested Puru to stop fighting.
In case, anyone wants to read more...
The only reference in Arrian’s history to a victory celebration by Alexander’s army was after the battle with Porus.
Alexander’s army did not indulge in celebrations after the Battle of Gaugamela where they defeated 200,000 Persians. No wild festivities were announced after the Battle of Issus where they defeated a mixed force of Persian cavalry and Greek mercenaries.
The fact they celebrated after the Battle of Hydaspes suggests they considered themselves extremely lucky to survive after the clash with the Hindu army, with its elephant corps.
According to the Greeks, Alexander was apparently so impressed by Porus that he gave back his kingdom plus the territories of king Ambhi of Taxila who had fought alongside the Macedonians.
This is counterintuitive. Ambhi had become Alexander’s ally on the condition he would be given Porus’ kingdom. So why reward the enemy, whose army had just mauled the Macedonians ?
The only possible answer is at the Battle of Hydaspes, the Macedonians realised they were dealing with an enemy of uncommon valour. Sensing defeat they called for a truce, which Porus accepted.
The Indian king struck a bargain in return for Ambhi’s territories, which would secure his frontiers, Porus would assist the Macedonians in leaving India safely. Alexander’s post-Hydaspes charitable behaviour, as per Greek accounts, is uncharacteristic and unlikely.
For, in battles before and after, he massacred everyone in the cities he subdued. Description of the War: The Greek force, after having lost several thousand soldiers fighting much smaller Indian mountain cities, were terrified at the prospect of fighting the Paurava army.
The Mongols were defeated in India, Vietnam, Japan, and Egypt.
Lol Japan? If you consider typhoons Japanese
and Java
@@cd5433 sure the typhoon help but the mongols landed on japanese soil and engage the samurai in couple of land battles, they won couple of battles earlier against the samurai with some losses until the samurai won later engagements against the mongols and in one battle kill 3500 mongols with just 100 samurai killed, after this the mongols decided to withdraw knowing they now facing real samurai's unlike few samurai's they encounter during there landing offensive.
@@fmoa2541Kamikaze Typhoon saved Japan from the Mongols.
@@shahrulamar5358 yeah and heavy losses they suffer during the landings, stop believe chinese propaganda saying typhoon save japan, yeah it did so did the samurai that inflict heavy losses on the mongols that landed, why didnt the mongols relaunch another invasion yrs later then, they can avoid the typhoon season and just invade japan again, instead they never return.
The term "Mughal" comes from a mispronunciation of the word "Mongol," but the Mughals of India were mostly ethnic Turks not Mongolians. However, Barbur (1483-1530), the first Mughal emperor, could trace his blood line back to Chinggis Khan.
You Mean Rape Blood Line !
Babur only made claim that his mother came from family of Chengiz khan.
At those times whoever was from the family of Chengiz khan was conaidered to be respected in society.
Babur was timurid , and was a turk, and all in the history they never used word mughal for their dynasty.
It is only the british hitorians that started uaing word mughal for them.
@@ROHITKumar-gl6mm Timur was a mongol from barlas tribe. He is not a chingisid but a mongol.
mughal means mongol in persian language what the hell are you blabbering about?
@@chuluunsugarragchaa6659 and barlas tribe itself is turkified, whats the point?
Mongol army was largely based on horses. That requires alot of feeding, so need to stay where grass is plentiful. Napolean had same issues with his caverly at waterloo. They were spreadout prior to battle so the horses could feed, and had to travel upto 20kms to the battle on the day to get to it.
I'm not sure if it was a different breed of horse or ponies but unlike the European horses the Mongolian horses/ponies could dig roots with their hooves for consumption and they had a wide range of leaves, bushes and grass in their diet that is why they could conquer the lands over 3 continents, so the example of Napoleon is wrong because you can compare him with Genghis Khan
Central Asian Horses Surely not Used to the Warm Tropical Humid Indian weather
Then explain how the Mongols easily crossed the Gobi desert and captured Tibet, neither of where there are grasslands.
nccamsc - You obviously don't know what you're talking about. The reason they didn't invade India is because the Indians were already really pissed about being beat by the cowboys in the USA and had acquired guns by that time. So the Mongols knew 1. the Indians would be very angry and 2. the Indians by then had superior weapons. Learn your history idiot!
Unlike the Greeks (Alexander\Sikandar) and Mongols who tried to fight head on , the Mughals and the British controlled India through political tactics. They strategically manipulated Hindu kings, fostering conflicts for their benefit. Although no one power could conquer Indian king's armies directly, rulers' pride caused the downfall of a once-prosperous land. This manipulation and internal strife diminished India's wealth and influence. This spanned from the Mughal era (1526-1857) to British colonial rule (1858-1947), shaping India's history.
Alauddin's forces, led by Ulugh Khan, defeated the Mongols on 6 February 1298. According to Amir Khusrow, 20,000 Mongols were killed in the battle, and many more were killed in Delhi after being brought there as prisoners.
Tbh , chengiz Khan was a kinda guy who really battled Outta revenge , if you guys read his life , He always seeked vengeance , and he really didn't needed to invade India and he really didn't wanna invade India
But he had a reason to attack. After the entourage he sent were killed
@@ayobamijonathan8063that wasn't India but the Khwarezmian Empire. Pay attention.
Not true. He conquered lots of lands just because he wanted to. He couldn't invade India because of the Sultan of Delhi at the time. The Mamluks of Egypt also faced the Mongols very well.
That's not how conquerors think. They see free money, they loot.
@@yafayafa9601 go and learn his life history
another reason the DElhi sultanate was formidable against the Mongols because they both used horse archers and almost same tactics, the advantage of mobility the mongols had against the heavily armoured europeans were neutralised
Wrong reason , mongols and Chengiz khan could easily invde India from east. If they can reach upto egypt and Poland which is very harsh and deserted area, then why not India which had plenty of reaouceswhich can sustain any army in the world. They had Tibet and china upto thailand.
The reason is simple they dont want to Invade India because it was the birthplace and land of Buddha because they follow buddhism. They dont want to kill Indians. Otherwise no king at that time could even stand a chance against Chengiz Khan, he us by far the greatest conqurer in history.
Western and islamic historians present Chengiz khan as evil and genocider. But infact he was very religiously tolerant and he only invaded other countries out of provocation. Westerners and islamic people hate Chengiz because he invaded their lands and conquer them.
So correct. The success of the Mongols were their novelty and Turkic people had similar tactics so they knew how to counter them. He failed to mention Alludeen Khilji who famously defeated Mongols many times.
@@ssa6227 the Mongols conquered all steppe Turks, kipchaks, cumans, khwarazmia and Azerbaijani Turks, Seljuk Turks, all types of Turks. What you mentioned is only the minority
@@ssa6227 the Mongols conquered all steppe Turks, kipchaks, cumans, khwarazmian and Azerbaijani Turks, Seljuk Turks, all types of Turks. What you mentioned is only the minority
The mongols didn't like butter chicken
then mongols had very bad taste. I love butter chicken😋
@@thecritiquer94071:37 of😮😊😮😢 pp😊😮😊😊 pp
@@thecritiquer9407😅😊😮😮😅😅 lo😊😅😊p oo
🎉😅😅😅😊😊😅😅😅😅😊😅😅😅😊😅😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
I have no idea why I know this useless information but Butter chicken was first served in the 1950's.
Appreciate the efforts
The excessive hot climate. They would raid in winters and go back. Even many of Baburs troops and a few generals left after his victories in India for the same reason.
so Egypt and the Arabian peninsula are cooler than northern India?
@@pratikrana7684not cooler but definitely not as humid and disease prone. And loo winds would have been a cherry on top. Mongol horses would have dropped dead like flies.
by the fifth time the Mongols were massacred in huge amount which forced them from invading India forever, but there were times when Mongol conquered North of India but then pushed back by the Delhi Sultanate
@@monsieur1936 Southern China is also hot and humid, the climate thing is not really a true reason.
@@thegodofthegods1084 North India is much more hotter than Southern China. In addition if you have to invade a place which can wipe you out, you need to have a strong motivation which was absent in the case of India.
Temujin was follower of Tengrinism which had close connection with Shakti beliefs of India's Hindus. He saw Indians as one of his kind.
😂😂😂
They were also very violent and ruthless
like pajeets
Yes n Thts why they shared meal with a alauddin khilji 😂
Tengrism believes in Skyfather and Shaktism in goddess worship. There's 0 similarity.
@@uselesshero.official Saw some flat earthers giggling in this thread, but I hope you are more rational. Have you heard about Umay (Tengrin's wife), the name and the incarnation is an absolute match to Devi Parvati (Shiva's Wife).
Have you seen the mausoleums of Mongols including Genghis Khan?
They sport Tridents. You simply can't dismiss a point of view.
By a the time the option to invade India came along the Mongols were no longer united and had went through several
Coups/civil wars. By the time the situation stabilized somewhat the Khan was only nominally the ruler of what you see on the map as the Mongol Empire. There were multiple power bases at that point and the conquest phase was essentially over…
Correct!
Later his sons attacked india 5 times near multan region and in delhi. That time delhi was ruled by khilji dynasty and they especially alaudin khilji repelled them 5 times.. 3 times as military general and then twice as king.. khilji dynasty made a guarded fort in delhi called siri fort which spread over miles, against Mongol invasions.
Proof?😊
Pls dont glorify ISLAM
Why MONGOL has TIBETAN BHUDHISM?
Read my facts❤
Yeah the same khilji who attacked india right😂
@@Salim123-ok9oi🤣🤣🤣 we all are what Islam has done with pakistan.....that is lesson for a thousand generations to never do that again
Invader prevented India from another invader😂
Over the next few years, Alauddin successfully fended off the Mongol invasions from the Chagatai Khanate, at Jaran-Manjur (1297-1298), Sivistan (1298), Kili (1299), Delhi (1303), and Amroha (1305). In 1306, his forces achieved a decisive victory against the Mongols near the Ravi riverbank, and later ransacked the Mongol territories in present-day Afghanistan. The military commanders that successfully led his army against the Mongols include Zafar Khan, Ulugh Khan, and his slave-general Malik Kafur
Source: Wikipedia
Great content as allways. 👍
😅............ ...... ............ ....... ...... .... ....... ........ ................ ..... ...... ....... .😅
😅............ ...... ............ ....... ...... .... ....... ........ ................ ..... ...... ....... .😅😊❤😅😅
😅............ ...... ............ ....... ...... .... ....... ........ ................ ..... ...... ....... .😅😊❤😅😅
Correction: The Mongols did attack India twice during the rule of Alauddin Khilji, and got defeated badly.
The Siri Fort in Delhi is named so for a reason.
Other from the Wikipedia and Indian own internal source, are you able to quote any reputed archaeologist or historian findings/ records on that?
That's a lie.
Bulshit!
@@tupolevinot an Indian source but, an Islamic Wikipedia source.
@@aschwinnie Yes, Wikipedia is being owned and run by the self-proclaimed "Islamic Emirate of Taliban (Afghanistan)" .. Right?
Lolz... 😂
Interesting content
Your voice is very clear.Tha nks
Who Said They not Invaded India Who was Taimor lung😂 he was Converted To Islam But he was The Mongol 😅
He was Turkic, his mongol ancestary has ever been confirmed. But yes he claimed ancestary from Genghis Khan and wanted to have the previous glory reclaimed. Taimur attacked and conquered Delhi but had to leave soon after, never having a real stronghold in India
First of all taimor lung never conquered India, he invaded India looted the wealth and ran away and secondly he was not Mangal he was a Turk, as you know mangoes wherever they visited they had babies with the local womens and your so-called taimur was also a product of it
@@answersaaabut his descendant Babur did it later
@@drjahon
Even before Babur, there were Muslim rulers here, Babur and the rulers who came after him continued to rule only because of the Muslims here, the majority of their commanders were Muslims from the subcontinent
I am Indian who has lived in Mongolia for quite some time . From my experience, I saw a remarkable similarity between our cultures and made friends with a lot of locals . Heard many stories about Genghis which the western historians do not register in their history books but it is known that way in Mongolia for thousands of years being passed down from ancestors.
They said Genghis did not invade India because they regarded and still do regard India as the land of Gods , the birthplace of the Buddha . Genghis did not want blood to be shed on Indian soil .
Buddha was not born in India for your information.
@pawan4072 in a way it was. Till he was in Nepal, he was Siddharta, not Buddha. Upon attaining enlightenment in India, he became Buddha. So in that sense, India really is the birth place of Buddha, and ofcourse Buddhism.
@@pawan4072 you need to update yourself , your logic suggests Subhash Bose was British.
@@MandeepSingh-bv2zw there was no Nepal , at that time .
Genghis khan was a follower of tengrism . so no question of any regard for Buddha.
I buy the climate hypotheses.Same reason they were stopped in northern Vietnam.
I'm so happy I made productive decisions about my finances that changed my life forever, hoping to retire next year... Investment should always be on any creative man's heart for success in life.
Yeah!! It would be more beneficial and yield more profit if you actually trade on cryptocurrency, I've been trading since the dip, I've made so much profit trading.
@CarlosLopesKarlloxI was convinced by the testimonies of her investors. I'm making high profit from Beatrice O Wendy's company.
it was a testimony like this that introduced me to her and although at first I thought she was not real but I can now boldly testify...her strategies were awesome and her trading last week was boooom!!!
For me I would say investing in Bitcoin was a great decision I and my partner ever took because at some point we were running down and didn't know what to do anymore, thanks to my colleagues at work who introduced me to a F.A.
@@thomasali5929How does this trading stuff work? am really interested but just don't know how to go about it heard people really make it huge trading
Lovely video, i would highly recommend everyone to play Age of Empires IV where u can relive these moments 😃 there are Delhi Sultanate and Mongol as playable factions too 😁👍
It was a good explained about Genghis khan the great ruler of Mongols empire.
Mongols never had a full scale campaign to invade India they only had small raids in Punjab region.
One of the reason of not attacking India at that time was that he did not have enough force to meet a fresh and powerful army of Sultan of Dehli. Gengez Khan fought the last brutal battle with joint forces of Khawarzim shah and Afghan tribes which destroyed a large part of mongol army and suffering a crushing defeat. Later Gengez Khan attacked Khwarzim Shah and destroyed his forces at the cost of heavy losses which make them unable to continue his campaigns in India. This fact was proven later when mongols attacked India and suffered crushing defeats in the hands of Alauddin Khilji Sultan of Dehli. In fact mongol emire disintegrated as soon as they started fighting with Mamluks of Egypt and Mamluks of Dehli who inflicted crushing defeats on mongols resulting in disintegration of mongol empire.
Gengez refrained from attacking India which was right decion otherwise they would have lost their power very early.
You need to have your own channel bro
You've got a point. This is a strong probability.
No, I don‘t think so.
Although they withdrew from India, but they still march on everywhere their horses carries them, non stopped.
It's simple, Watson. Malaria and dysentery were the reason Greeks and Mogols couldn't go into India, in fact Alexander the Great died of malaria he had gotten infected when he reached India.
@@merrick6484 Imagine 13 century and see how you can face a powerful enemy soon after you fight two consecutive battles at the cost of heavy losses. Secondly, you will face harsh weather not suitable to your troops who are not familiar with hot and humid weather accompanied by deadly mosquetos.
Mongols came from a cold areas and were not able to survive is extreme heat.
They could not chase Khawarzim Shah in India and later mongol invaded India and were defeated by Balban. They kept on invading India after they reconvered from defeats after defeats. No doubt they were successful against Europe and somehow middle east but soon after the defeat at Ain Jalut their bad time started in middle east also.
Another factor for not able to conquer India was that Gengez Khan was chasing Sultan Jalal uddin the son of Khwarzim shah and he tried to capture a part of India but Iltutmish forces intervened and then Gengez Khan left Uch Shareef and Multan and entered Iran in a search of Sultan Jalal uddin.
Its was not the wise decision to engage with a strong force of Dehli Sultanat and leave the chase of a weaker enemy who was also wanted by Gengez.
Soon Gengez died and his decendent Monke Khan attacked India but was defeated by the forces of Sultan Balban. Balban had a special commando force in his army dedicated for difficult operations. Some sources claim that Balban had around 200000 troops exceeding the mongol overall strength.
India was well polulated area and recruiting such a large army was not difficult as many turks and central asians also took refuge in India after Mongol conquered those areas.
As a matter of fact India army of 13th century was not only well equipped and larger in size than Mongols but also a formidable force in the entire region commanded by well trained and seasoned commanders. Thats the reason Mongols losts almost all the battles in India. India was the only place where mongols losts their entire army claiming to be as big as 100000 troops which caused innihilation of their fighting capability.
Following were the main reasons why mongols lost in India.
1. Hostile weather
2. Better prepared, well equipped and larger forces of enemy
3. Hostile and comlex terrain, suitable for encircling and trapping invaders.
4. Better and modern technology of enemy
In ancient times cavalry warfare had no chance against armored elephants.
No it's the opposite.
But everyone will get fucked in the combined Indian meat grinding war machine when anyone attacks upfront.
@kevinsabharwal1822 False. Armored elephants become soo terrified and panicked by gun powder explosion so they trampled the their own foot soldiers and cavalry, a big reason for indian defeat to mughals.This battle scene is written in history books. Mughals (mongols) used this tactic of scaring elephants soo successful.
Unlike the Greeks (Alexander\Sikandar) and Mongols who tried to fight head on , the Mughals and the British controlled India through political tactics. They strategically manipulated Hindu kings, fostering conflicts for their benefit. Although no one power could conquer Indian king's armies directly, rulers' pride caused the downfall of a once-prosperous land. This manipulation and internal strife diminished India's wealth and influence. This spanned from the Mughal era (1526-1857) to British colonial rule (1858-1947), shaping India's history.
@@chuluunsugarragchaa6659 no gunpowder at Mongol empire's timeline of invading Persia.
The mongols horses would not have been a match for Indian elephants. Alexander the Great fought to a draw with an Indian army that was using elephants. He final decided that they made better allies and made a truce with them. I’m not sure if they were still fighting with elephants at the time of the Mogols but that would be an interesting matchup.
Indian stop using elephant in 16 to 18 century. Since Indian lack technology against guns and canon and other powder Material. That's why European were able to conqueror it. Because of lack technology
Alexanders experienced warriors faced so much difficulties and faced their toughest battles against the Indians, so tough were the battles that Alexanders men were low on morale after the battle against Porus and were reluctant to push forward inwards in to India
@@BogalaSawundiris I think he was experiencing a variety of problems and he forces were not in the fight anymore, yes. At the end of the road.
@@BogalaSawundiris Alexanders men heard stories about oceans of army waiting for them in mainland India which made them push back
You're delusional.
Alexander The Great beat that 7 feet tall Indian King fair and square. The mighty war machine of dedicated and disciplined Macedonians were a fight to many for unprofesional army of Indian King. They eat the dust even in the heavy rain season in battlefield.
Out of pity, Alexander The Great reappoint the Indian King to his throne once again. He knows that India continent is too easy for him.
Even the veterans of Macedonian army acknowledged that to return to their homeland is much more better than to continue fighting a rag tags of a weak army of Indian with so many petty kings and regional Lords.
Understanding this, Alexander and his army bade farewell to India.
First the fucking hard climb over the mountains, the Mongols grew up on horseback so they could hardly walk or climb, then even if they got over the mountains, the heat, humidity and mosquitos with malaria finished them off
well those few invasion were small in numbers and werent even a campaign. it was only few chagatai descents raiding party with their small army.
Look all I understand is this, if India is together, be it Alexander or Chengiz Khan, they all decide to go back rather than fighting. The moment it breaks up into 50 different kingdoms, it is easy to play one against another and take over India without much fighting. Happened with Delhi Sultanate, Mughals and the British.
Currently, I would say India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan all has same world view. All of these are economically integrated, and we soon might have a common armed force. Pakistan and Afghanistan are states that need to be fixed but that would take a long time.
I love the recent Agnipath Scheme of the Indian govt. Teenagers will be recruited, trained in warfare, serve the country for 4 years, get great amount of money for their service, the top 25% stay back with the armed forces and then rest is released back into the society. Over decades, it would create a society of disciplined warriors who know how to fight, kill and would have contact with the armed forces high command in case they need coordination to complete a task when in society. That would be another line of defense of 1.4 billion people that would save the state in case all defense mechanisms collapse.
India's dense population and humid climate were probably the main factors. But how did the British do it? 🤔
The British did it through manipulation and flattering the the Indian Raj's. Then they put on a false front of ultimate power when in reality they could have been expelled from India at any time if the Indian population had good leadership. The problem is by the time the British came along the Indian leaders were lazy, corrupted and overindulgent. The people were hopeless. They had no motivation to take back their country.
british invaded from the east they mainly won through diplomacy
both mughals and british ruled india by politics.....making hindu kings fight each other and taking advantage of situation.......directly no one had the power to defeat indian king armies......but ego of kings had drown the richest land into the drain.
Divide and rule, make different Indian kingdoms fight between each other.
@@Dangermonkey1000+1
Nice 👍
Currently, there are more mongols living in Inner Mongolia, China than in the independent Mongolia (Outer Mongolia) itself.
Yeah, those who messed up with Han Chinese normally paid with their future generations - the Mongols, the XiongNu/Huns, the Manchu's, ... Their kids are learning Han Chinese as their official language in school these days. Or maybe that's what they want? Who knows.
Thanks to Alauddin Khilji for saving the Indian people…
You clearly don't know what kind of a ruler he was
Stupid 😂
Genghis Khan never invaded
India
@@weirdgrimjow5372but he still saved them
@@Buttermonk. bro nobody saved Indians. Enter of Turkic rulers destroyed the Indian social system completely. India was divided into many kingdoms making it lose it's potential to counter foreign invaders, but as a whole the entire subcontinent contributed atleast 1/3rd of the world's gdp util 1600s or 1700 not sure and even more than 1/3rd during the ancient period. The enter of muslim rulers did a lot of damage and british did even worse damage.
@weirdgrimjow5372 but if india was under mongol rules then there would be skull mountains of indians, we did slaughter india but mongols wouldve done even worse.
I wonder about the genetic influence of the different horse breeds that they would have come in contact with and how that would’ve affected their Mongol Horses because obviously they had to trade mounts and have fresh mounds constantly that they’re there Horses at some given point would’ve worn out and they would’ve been taking whatever they wanted from wherever they were and now I’m wondering if if some of those bloodlines would’ve went back to the horses that are currently in Mongolia just food for thought
Mongol horses are simply some of the most resilient creatures, let alone horses, on earth
Unlike the Greeks (Alexander\Sikandar) and Mongols who tried to fight head on , the Mughals and the British controlled India through political tactics. They strategically manipulated Hindu kings, fostering conflicts for their benefit. Although no one power could conquer Indian king's armies directly, rulers' pride caused the downfall of a once-prosperous land. This manipulation and internal strife diminished India's wealth and influence. This spanned from the Mughal era (1526-1857) to British colonial rule (1858-1947), shaping India's history.
The reverence for , and interest in megalomaniacal conquerers and mass murderers never ceases to amaze...
Anyone who attacks the holy lands of India and Indians will be cursed for enternity. Their soul and being will be will be crushed. This applied in ancient to medieval to modern and future times, 🇮🇳
Unlike Central Asia & Western Europe, which had steppe grasslands , ideal for Mongolian cavalry, indian terrain was mostly huge rivers and forests. Significant more dangerous wildlife & a very very large population to subjugate. The Mongol cavalry in the north indian gangetic plains , with its alluvial soil & forests, becomes quite useless against an army with war elephants. Genghis knew , he would be sucked in to endless conflicts in extreme heat + a mammoth monsoon season which would have made a cavalry charge useless on muddy lands. He was smart, he calculated his odds & refrained from attacking. Although in later years some of his descendants would try, but its still practically impossible for a cavalry specific army to conquer india. India was only conquered when Canons came in to picture.
Ghenghis conquered baghdad... Thats only reason we like him
The price of that conquest was golden hard and al Khanate revert to islam ..by the way his grand son timur conquered india as muslim latter on that's why we don't hate mongol
@@MirwankhiljiGenghis hated muslims. He wanted to destroy them. He didn't care about winning. Also the dude you're talking about barely captured northern regions. The latter descendants weren't even completely islamic.
Ganghis defeated allah quran and islam i like great khan
@@MirwankhiljiBlind Muslim😂
Get lost from TH-cam 😂
@@Mirwankhiljibro whole central asia is muslim know cuz of genghis Khan . Love from kolkata westbengal. Currently in riyadh saudi arabia
The damn mountains too fucking hard to climb after riding all day in the saddle
Do you know the religion of Temujin was Tengri with Trishul (Trident) and crescent moon same as Lord Shiva. It might be one of the reasons why he spared India.
The main reason for not attacking deep inside india was large armies of Indian kingdoms
Turkish government in Delhi sultanate, New mongol tactics, weapons, because after 12.20ce when jallaludin khawrizmi jumped into the indus river, jehangaiz Khan said if his father was half as brave, his country would be fine, hundreds thousands refugees came to Northern India, including army veterans, these we're the people saved India plus great Delhi sultanate leaders, they defeated the mongols 5 times, biggest battle outside Delhi 90,000 mongols we're definitely beaten 12.90's by their brilliant commander Zafer shah.
Good joke
full scale invasion of Mongols had never happened in India
Extremely Wrong, These Sultantes in India had Persian as the court language which clearly indicates There was not Turkish association as these people came from Persia not Turkey, they were called Turks because they are the same alchon Huns who were Buddhist before, similarly no record tells about Turkish soldiers moving in India when the Sultanate armies was comprised in huge numbers of Indians only so no Turkish methods, weapon etc was used here it was either Persian weapon and techniques and Indian soldiers fighting for India, and after just 80-95 years we see Sultanates being thrown over by Rajputs and Vijaynagara in India
@jitendra tiwari 4 times, 1290, over 90,000 mongols came to conquer Northern India, lost this Battle,
@@rashidrahman9673 as a Mongolian, I can confirm your source is trust me bro.
So essentially no one has any idea
good
India was the wealthiest country of Asia....
In the world * before British came
@@vinayak90417 Correct...
I must congratulation y o u for explaining the whole Mongal Empire in such a short time of explanation my name is Bhagirath Singh and I am very much fascinated about the theories you have put forward being local to north India and having abundant knowledge of its history I must say I am impressed no historian of European Heritage or American heritage had so clear understanding of Mongal Empire and its relationship with North India but I must connect you on 1 misconception of religions you have actually in the 12th century when changes Khan was alive Buddhism and Hinduism were not to different religions even now Lord Gautam Buddha founder of current Buddhist religious architecture was considered as an avatar of Maha Vishnu. When Genghis Khan was alive the only real reason that he never invaded India was because of his religious moral s which prevented him to attack India after conquering Tibet as any ardent student of Buddhism with respect to Lord Gautam Buddha and his predecessors he considered India as a holy land and that was the only clear reason that superstitious Emperor Changers Khan who fought Wars after confirming with religious Mystic people of many different countries and many different states 12 century world particularly Asia was not the same as it is now influence of India was just not for wealth as is a misconception of British historians it was very clear to Genghis Khan the martial spirit of Aryans who dominated at that time it doesn't matter that the capital Delhi was ruled over by pre Islamic rulers but due to the fear of soldiers and army generals were of local regions as India was famous for its wealth for its culture for its religious values for its trade values even in 12 century India had the most mightest Army world had ever seen.
Great narrative but some punctuation would have made it better.
What on earth is this? Concoction of a bhakt's left butt cheek
North side sultan empire, south chola empire available. If mongals entered, sure , they will not go back. Unfortunately if came to south, if although got victory, going back return cannot, before going return need to lose all troops. Chola had more 1 lakh troops, more than 10000 elephant foces, more than 25000 horse foces, paw forces, spear forces.
Cholas would have got fu%ked by mongals.
Because delhi sultanate were turkic hence they were unable to beat with existing tactics , because delhi sultanate were using the same, as well as rajput were descendants of turkic tribe (pre 10th C).
Excerpt from Netflix series Marco Polo, this depicted Kublai Khan.
This fellow says china as richest country in asia. It was India. This fellow didn't knew this much.
It was China that was the richest most of the time. India came in at no.2
@@James-sn5mg Factually incorrect.
@@Govinda462 correct
@@Govinda462 th-cam.com/video/3Oty-gJQVps/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=RankingCharts
@@James-sn5mg Thank you for correcting yourself.
Most of accounts of the Great Khan are written by his enemies, thereby it is obvious that he would be depicted as a bloody and gore loving ruler. Most other rulers he was fighting were equally violent in their approach though not depicted such.
Almost all of his campaigns were lead as a result of a necessity to protect Mongol ruler legitimacy or as a retaliation. Therefore he had no reason to fight the Indian kings.
Technical problems like bows not working or horses not being suitable can be easily overcome by using local materials and training and recruiting locally (which was done throughout history).
🤣Reminds me of the muskovites. Most peaceful group, never started a war, everyone else despises them so unjustly, somehow ended up controlling the largest territory and still hungry for more.
Today the Indians and Chinese are prospering. The Mongols and Mughals descendants are poor and in poverty or have nothing much
The warlike tribes that preceded them. Like the scythians and Huns.
In south and mid india the great tamilian zchola kings Rajan and Rajendra cholan had big armies with brave soldiers.
This is why south india was protected much
Bro , During time of Mongol invasions Cholas were weak, already past their glory days. The Kakatiyas were significant force during 1200's and same can be said regarding Hoyasalas of 11th century (1200's). Get ur facts correct .
🤦
Rajarajan was not born when ghengiz Khan invaded India 🤣
@@RazikSulthanyeah he was born way before than that 😂
China is not attacking us today because cholas are very strong..
The subcontinent which was the birthplace of the Buddha and his life was considered a holy land by many across Asia. And that was a big reason for not invading it.
Amitabha lord buddha was not born in India
@@fake9475 The budhha was born, got enlightenment, spent his entire life and died in the Indian subcontinent, yes his place of birth is in the current borders of Nepal. But that doesn't mean India was not the birthplace of Buddhism
India is also birthplace of Deobandi Movement, the Islamic school of thought that Taliban too follows and defeated super power America... Proud to be an Indian muslim
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey India is not a "Holy land" for any kind of Muslim according to any Islamic theology/Scripture. And Islam is not an Indian religion. Islam was, is and will always remain a non-Indian, foreign ideology historically imposed and accepted by those who got intellectually influenced by the Invaders.
Islam can call itself whatever it likes but Islam can never call itself Indian or associate itself with Indians native civilization in ANY way.
Islam will NEVER be "Indian" and Muslims will never be the inheritors of India's ancient civilization.
@@theriam6281 India is not holy land like Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem but first Man on earth was Adam (pbuh) who was descended upon the Earth in the region of Indian subcontinent, forced conversion is not allowed in Islam, you should also have to wonder about invaders in Indonesia Malaysia Brunei but you can't as most people out there converted due to good ethics of the muslims, business ethics and faithfulness
yes Islam also spread through behaviour of muslims and the financial faithfulness, we are already upon the religion of our father, it is hindus who need Ghar Wapsi....
Second of all, many prophets was sent to India whose name is unknown but there are 7 or 11 graves of prophets in Sirhind, Punjab alone it was disclosed to Sheikh Sirhindi in is spritual disclosure and One of our elder from Deoband who hails from Thana Bhavan, UP also talked with the soul of one those prophets or all prophets when he was on Muraqba (sufi meditation) near their graves.
it is also claimed that grave of Sheesh alaihis salam is in Ayodhya who was the son of Prophet Adam alaihis salam but we can't say for certainty....
Don't just limit India to hindu Rishi munis and yogis, it is also the place of big Derveshes and unknown Prophets, Delhi alone had many derveshes of high rank once infact Shah Waliullah Dehlvi wrote Islamic world order when he was in Delhi, Sheikh Sirhindi was reviver of second millennium period of muslim Ummah and he witnessed graves of Prophets in Sirhind, Punjab and before second millennium period revivers were only sent to Arab and Persian world
A branch of Sufi Silsila called Naqshbandi-Mujadidi was founded by Sheikh Sirhindi, Tablighi jamaat was born in India and it is world largest Islamic preaching organisation, Darul uloom Deoband is largest madrasa in whole Asia where Deobandi Movement originated from and it is one of the influencial Islamic movement of the world
Armored elephants; shit everywhere; macaques creeped out the Mongols; Indians are totally chill unless majorly provoked and the Mongol barbs, quips, and insults could not piss off the Indians enough to fight which left the Mongols totally confused so they travelled north and went after the easily provokable Pollocks.
Genghis Kong seems to have been very intelligent man very down to earth in a great many ways you can’t help but respect his accomplishments
Indians never fought against the mongols. it was the khilji empire (who were Afghans and turks and who ruled India) which defeated the mongols. the native indians didn't do anything
@@akiogood4712 Pity your history...for all the atrocities of Khilji tyrant his only good was defeating the Mongols with generous help of natives in his own army. And Remember King Prithu who defeated the Nalanda destroyer Khilji so badly that the khiji fellow died in shame and shock soon thereafter
The narrator has difficulty differentiating between the number 0 and the letter o.
😄
19o6...it should be 1906, as in Nineteen Hundred and Six.
Only the "Faux-Timor" or Tamerlane entered India with evil intent. He was a native Afghan Muslim with no Mongol blood. However, he knew the difference Indian and Turks (he had been fighting Turks all his life). He attacked only the occupying Turks and only in Delhi to stop them from financing Turkey Turks, Iranian Turks and Afghan Turks.
Total rubbish - you Hindus want to re-write history in fictional terms due mainly to your very obvious hatred of Muslims who gave India civilised behaviour. The Mongols were defeated by the Turkic sultans of India thus saving the heathen Hindus from very obvious extermination.
Mongols tried and were partially successful but defeated badly.
What’s the best mongol vs Indian tv series? Or movie ?
And I must add and compare some differences India and its society as hole had. Genghis Khan control over an Empire which shared borders with Europe and let me tell you when Europeans were living in forest in old tribal fashion where has India was far more advance then them when European kingdoms began to emerge and particularly when they learn and created their languages my ancestors used to travel on chariots while they started to hunt animals for food at the same time agriculture was the primary work of North Indians and I am not talking about Garden farming I am talking about the techniques and Technology my uncestors developed made made agriculture very very easy for them. When these Europeans dressed themselves in animal skins and at the same time people of India were wearing very high quality clothing which was made from cotton wool and Silk why else do you think India was invaded many many times starting from its neighbours and up to British rule what do you think they wanted for what they tried over and over to conquer India Forever
Yet where is all the poverty today, for such an 'advanced' society, with so much history. How many die from lack of clean water? Clinging to a gilded version of some barely accurate past and by extension elevating yourself is hardly new, and is deeply intellectually dishonest.
You live in a poor, dirty country, even today. And still most homes do not have basic plumbing...
@@BeingFireRetardant Well ask Britain to give 45 Trillion $ and Pakistan back to us since historically the amount the Brits looted from us cant even be returned if they sold their whole nation out, and no Nigeria is the highest poverty nation and India has gone down in that sense, you whites should remember you’re rich because we are poor and working to grow ourselves so don’t give us that BS (BTW India is 5th Largest economy and yes 96% India homes have proper plumbing facilities compared to Europeans who resist Russia but can’t even stop using their oil and now are going into recession because they can’t steal right now unlike your coward ancestors who can’t even progress without suppressing others 😂😂)
@@BeingFireRetardant ask the the empire why? Their colonization history tell ya... Why one of the wealthiest countries in the world at the time of British and it's European brothers colonized india and left it in dirt poor, malnourished and crumpled society
It's not a "barely" accurate past, It's THE accurate past.
You Westerners can keep enjoying the loot of the past 400 years, but I bet you it won't last another 100 years.
@@BeingFireRetardant the 21st century belongs to India we will once again be the richest country on earth as well as oldest surviving civilisation and religion 🕉️ stop hating we are the greatest land the golden land of earth
This analysis is utterly biased, Timujin was not a Buddhist, he was a shaminist, Tengri was there God
Mongolian history is complex. please try to explain these details more clearly, carefully, and slowly.
Gengez was wise enough to refrain from attacking India, as he did not have enough strength to do at that time. Later his desendents made this mistake and lost all what they had after suffering crushing defeats when mongol generals were brought to Dehli and crushed under the feets of elephants. This was utter humiliation for mongols for being disrespected and dishonored this way by Sultan of Dehli.
Indian kings defeated mongols in two main battles which broke mongols' back and they never recovered after these humiliating defeats, battle of Killi and Balltle of Amroha. These two battles proved to be devastating for mongols as their main commanders were captured during these battles and their complete army was killed. Some accounts claim that an army of 100000 of mongols was killed and 22000 were made slaves. One can see a place called mughalpura in New Dehli where these mongol slaves were kept who later converted to Islam. Attacking Egypt and India proved to be bad omen for mongols. Muslim sources claim that mongols downfall started soon after they attacked Baghdad and desecrated Calif as he was a religious head of Muslim around the world. Even some fortune telling people warned Halaku Khan not to invade capital of Muslim Calif as it may cause downfall of his empire. Coincidentally soon after Halaku destroyed Baghdad, he died miserably after falling from his horse back, after his death, his drsendents could not save their state, even their religion and culture were lost. They lost everything after destruction of Baghdad.
😂
You are wrong
@@lakshyaphogat7388 How am I wrong?
Read the history and see yourself how mongols lost everything.
If you dont believe me go and see the areas which were conquered by Mongols, you will not find a single mongol there. A tiny minority left here accepted Islam as they had no other choice.
Mongols attacks numerous times during Sultan Balban, Sultan Khilji and later also but could not conquer India instead they lost their territory to Indian kings/Sultans.
Let me share few facts which you can verify other than whats written in books.
1. Do you deny any settlement called Mughalpura in Deli India?
2. Do you deny Hazara people who are living in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Hazara are desendents of Mongols, one can clearly see their mongoloid features.
3. Do you deny the fact that there is no Budhist ot Shanist in Pakistan, Afganistan, Iran, Turkey, Iraq and Syria? These were part of Mongol empire for very long time.
4. Do you deny the fact thar Halaku died in humiliation and his descendants could not save empire and their religion. They are insignificant now? No onr know if Mongolia is a country? They are confined to a rag tag country and cannot assert their influence anymore.
@@lakshyaphogat7388 Care to elaborate please?
Great info
As if I couldn't love this man more
Why would you love a monster exactly?
@@Typlical_reality because I'm a monster raaarrrr
@@ranjitsardar9920eww edgy weeb
@@Typlical_reality wiped out millions of muslims and only desired revenge.
@@Souchi-ito wiped out millions of muslims and only desired revenge.
The correct title should be 'What prevented Ghenghis Khan from invading India' because later Mongols did invade India and were brutally suppressed.
"I have read the Greeks; I find the Hindus deeper."
------ Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Alaudin Khilji the master who defeated mongols permanently
Get your facts right Nobody knows why Mongols refused to invade India .
Actually according to writing of their general , india was too hot and dirty and he wrote that their women too ugly for mongols . Freaking racist which saved india
Delhi sultanate is origin from turkic tribe.battle tactics are almost the same for delhi sultanate and mongols.
@@techessentials4105 Half knowledge is dangerous 😂😂😂😂
Genghis Khan refused to invade India
But Halaku Khan did and got defeated miserably by Alauddin Khilji aka the saviour of India.
But you people of hindutva ideology will always disrespect him
That’s the main point behind your whole story.
The Mongols is a collective name given to various nomadic people of central Asia. The Turks were one of these people who were prized warriors in the middle east. The Mongols triggered mass migrations of Turkic people into the middle east, serving as slave soldiers initially, then rebelling and founding their own dynasties. The Turks were one of the people who could be called Mongols as well. They founded the memluk empire in Egypt, the ottoman empire in Anatolia, and the sultanate of Delhi in India, which later became the Mughal empire under other dynasties. The difference between Turks and other Mongol peoples was that Turks were highly islamized and adopted all customs and cultures of the middle east, while the Mongols just pillaged and plundered. Basically, the Mongols invaded India before Genghis khan was even born.
May be supply chain issues with their primary tool of war, the horse?
Turgut Scence was Awsome in video😂
The delhi sultunate had a lot of hindu warriors who helped delhi sultunate in repelling mongol invasion the intelligence started to come when afganistan suffered from mongol hindu leaders in sultuate army came up with new tactics to defeat mongols but it was a mistake and this lead to extention of delhi sultunate power which was later defeated by hindu kings in series of battles finally ending with abhrahim lodi defeated by hindu leader rana sanga and later he lodi was killed in battle of panipat by babar though rana sanga was defeated by babur hindu kings were free from delhi sultunate babur was later had to return afganistan he and his son could not conquer India. Though akbar grandson of baber establsihed mughal empire who juest fell in 200 year by hand rajput, sikh maratha and southern kings. I have to say though i am muslim hindus showed very stiff resistance to muslim invaders saving their religion and culture.
that's not true. the khilji empire didn't allow any non-muslims to enter their army. what else have you learned in your Whatsapp university?
@@akiogood4712 I have learned this directly from source books you can check them
Here is the list you an read them.
"Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi" (Chronicle of Firoz Shah) by Ziauddin Barani: Written by a court historian during the reign of Sultan Firoz Shah Tughlaq, this chronicle provides valuable insights into the events and administration of the Delhi Sultanate.
"Tabaqat-i-Nasiri" (The Book of Nasiruddin) by Minhaj-i-Siraj: Composed by Minhaj-i-Siraj, a 13th-century historian, this work offers a comprehensive account of the Delhi Sultanate up to the reign of Sultan Nasiruddin Mahmud.
"Tarikh-i Alai" (Chronicle of Alai) by Amir Khusrau: Authored by the renowned poet and historian Amir Khusrau during the reign of Sultan Alauddin Khilji, this chronicle provides valuable information about the reign of Alauddin Khilji.
"Tawarikh-i Mubarak Shahi" (The History of Mubarak Shah) by Yahya bin Ahmad Sirhindi: This work presents a historical account of the Sayyid dynasty, which ruled over Delhi after the decline of the Tughlaq dynasty.
@@akiogood4712 source?
Unlike the Greeks (Alexander\Sikandar) and Mongols who tried to fight head on , the Mughals and the British controlled India through political tactics. They strategically manipulated Hindu kings, fostering conflicts for their benefit. Although no one power could conquer Indian king's armies directly, rulers' pride caused the downfall of a once-prosperous land. This manipulation and internal strife diminished India's wealth and influence. This spanned from the Mughal era (1526-1857) to British colonial rule (1858-1947), shaping India's history.
@@thebestevertherewas that's your fake history. I'm reality hindus never had any kings of their own because they were slaves to foreigners. they only had foreign kings who ruled them. the mongols were repelled by the Afghan /turkic khilji empire, not by the hindus. the Greeks withdrew because of their defeat in Afghanistan. the mughal and british conquered India and ruled it for 450 years. hindus are the weakest and most miserable people in earth
The Mongols were similar to the Comanche and Apache Indians, they ride the horse with expert speed while shooting Arrows. And also they are good with weapons and martial Arts.
Unlike the Plains Native Americans, Mongols had invented a bow that can shoot through armor, while being armored in metal themselves.
@@electrominded8372 Wow thank you for the knowledge of History, I appreciate for you to share it with me. Kodus to you. You are a Scholar and intelligent..👍☺
They actually found the grave og genghis Khan! He eventually got a green card and is buried in Arlington in Washington dc !!! Anythingh for a freaking green card
All indian kings had enormous elephant army force and Mongol did not anticipate this force because it was absolutely new to them if they faced this indian, particularly in Southside, they would all die in the battle field. Moreover, tamil cholas the biggest empire in the earth, no one close to cholas but certain people intensely destroy and hide tamil culture to the world. Cholas dynasties stand over 600 years around the world. Moreover, he was world first king to have a naval force and it was biggest naval force around 1000 war ship. He not only conquer the land but also conquer the water.
India was technically and militarily strong then Mangolia , they had advanced education system, advanced weapons, huge castle and strong and huge standing army and geographic advantages too.
Alauddin khilji seven times slapping on mongol face khilji, be like come on ,slap, slap😂😂👋👋👋💪🤫🤫
At that time mongols were very weak.
Your warlord daddy would've pissed himself if mongols were in their prime, the orginal mongols who aren't Muslim are still great
Mamuluks were non-Arab, ethnically diverse (mostly Turkic, Caucasian, Eastern and Southeastern European. Mumuluks were diverse and mostly from temprate climate mogols lived in much more cold and harsh climate.
Still, it was the Arabs of Palestine who halted the Mongol army, they tried to take Gaza and other Palestinian cities but they failed miserably, they were chased out to Ain Jalut 200 km north of Gaza where the army from Egypt managed to finish them off
I wish people would just leave a question unanswered instead of making up shits. He doesn’t give a shit about burning people or religion.
India was the wealthiest country in Asia and the world...
Temarlane did it!
I believe it was Buddhism and climate that prevented the great Khan from invading north India.
It was not the omen but the overall knowledge of the land and his contacts with the people. The main reason was the climate and religion. Ghenghis was an extremely intelligent worrier and not just what some foreign historians like to suggest.
Mongols Were Not Fighting For Economy They Were Fightng For Ego 😮 Gangish khan Was Attacking Them Who was Show him They Unbeaten
He was basically taking revenges
Not only climate the mangol invation came to knoe of great empires of india those years.
Dpecially that time great empires from south like chola Rajaraja
and his son Rajendra cholaof Tamil land land were ruling much of i.dia . Also the rlephants in the armies were a great threat in fighting these huge animals ans solders on them with arms
This was well after the prime of the Cholas
Unlike the Greeks (Alexander\Sikandar) and Mongols who tried to fight head on , the Mughals and the British controlled India through political tactics. They strategically manipulated Hindu kings, fostering conflicts for their benefit. Although no one power could conquer Indian king's armies directly, rulers' pride caused the downfall of a once-prosperous land. This manipulation and internal strife diminished India's wealth and influence. This spanned from the Mughal era (1526-1857) to British colonial rule (1858-1947), shaping India's history.
Chola Empire predates this by a couple 100 years lol
Curry made mongol soldiers stomach upset . They were forced to go back to Mongolia 😊
So you need 22 Minutes to say "nobody knows, but there are dozens of suggestions".
"Great Job".
An invader prevented India from another invader 😂 Lol
Abe 1 cr likes do kuchh to badhiya likha hai...
😂 2 likes hai. Thoda dur hai, ho jayega.
Teray purvajo ka Kya tha malecho k baad Mongols ko bhi apni Mahelao k rishtay offer kr denay thay 😂
@@HigherCastekPitaPakistani😂bro you remain unemployed lol your history will. Not feed your family
@@HigherCastekPitaPakistani😂😂 lol look like your cute shemale ancestors won against british
Just like any empire hindu empire faced downfall in same way muslim rulers faced downfall when british came.. Its normal its not like you are powerful lol
. If its case why you are poor till now
Mongolians couldn’t take on the army of elephants the Indians had
So we are all simply gonna ignore that Genghis's descendant Aamir Taimur Lang did actually manage to successfully invade India at the advent of the Sayyed Dynasty? or the fact that the Mughals had Mongol ancestry?
Mongols createdTerror whereever they invaded. The strongest rulers of Delhi could fight back Mongol invasion n counter with terror and therefore Mongols never dared to come in. We are to be grateful to strong rulers who had saved India, its civilization , culture and main religion from the barbaric invaders. .
Lack of fighters is a reason why the Mongols didn't attack India. The other reason is India was already controlled by the Turks (Kuru), so Mongols would have to fight their own people. The Third reason was just looting the treasury would do for the task at hand.
Mongols did conquer India...
They were called Mughals... And the first emperor was called Babur who was a direct descendant of BOTH Genghis Khan aswell as Timur(Tamerlane).
Also, the himalayas prevented the east Asians from taking India.... Nearly all Invasions of India were done from the North West... Khyber pass... Meaning modern day Pakistan.
this is such cope the mughals and mongols are completely different empires him being a descendant of khan means nothing
@@anbbbe what would u non tribal people know about tribes from central asia😂😂😂🤔
DNA means nothing
Blood means nothing
Legacy means nothing
Names mean nothing
I guess history itself doesn't. Mean anything
@@sabtaingopinath9652 sorry that we civilized people don't know anything about uncivilized tribal people of Mongol.
Yeah if you mean bastards of the women mongols raped in central asia😂
Mughals were not mongols they have ancestry of both mongols and Turks baburs ancestry from his mother side goes back to genghiz Khan in 11 line and his ancestry from fathers side goes back to timur in the 5 line timur was a turco mongol ruler of central Asia thus the ancestor of the Mughals.
The Mongols were not that interested in India.
Mongols were pushed back by Navy's artillery of juda si sulitan
Ghenghis Khan had trade relations with India and was sure that he will face heavy loss directly fighting Delhi Sultanate's well organized and well equipped massive army. He was afraid.
Themuchin was a trader as well as a warrior. He started the world cnquest after carefull study of the military strategies and tactics of his contemporary empires. Those who could understand mongol warefare like turks, eughors and tartars were given a share in power. For his failure, in India, he had never thought of Afghans having specific military skills. Afghans ruled india then, under Allawodin Ghilji together with turks and ghrid tribes. When he faced Afghans in the battlefield, he confronted an amalgam of greek wisdom, isrealite stubborness, islamic zealotry and indian cunningness and afghan resiliance alltogether. He tried and failed because afghan prowess was unfathomable. So he gave up even on revenge. Todays Pashtoon ethenic groups of Afghanistan are the result of Afghan soldiers marrying the mongol women they captured after slaying the invading mongol men😊
Lmao you nd super clean India deserve each other
Mongols never had a full scale campaign to invade India they only had small raids in Punjab region + turkic horse archers knew the mongol way of fighting which helped and mongols had entire afghanistan under them
@@chetanmankar2057 You need some more enlightenment, through reading standard history books. Afghanistan didnt exit at that time. It was Khorasan of Persians, by then. Afghans ruled india at that time. Huge mongol armies were crushed by Afghans. Afghans colonized the modern day Afghanistan after taking it from Mongols. The battle of Ain jalout was a small skirmish for killing the snake that was already dead. Infact Afghans are the only race which defeated mongol armies of more than two times greater size in the open field at the peak of Mongol power. If Timochin had come himself, his decendants would have found him hanging upside down at Delhi gate.
@@sultan1050 at that time India was not ruled by afghans, the upper north ruled by a turkic empire called Delhi sultanate and central and south was ruled by other hindu kingdoms
It was a Turkik sultanate that ruled Delhi - NOT Afghans
Afghans were ruled over by Persia until the Mughal Empire conquered Afghanistan
Muslim kings of india were way more powerful & organised at that time and fought mohgols & made them run , khiljis , gakhars & Pathans tribes were major hurdles for mangols , khilji king of india made sure mongols don't make through borders of hindustan . And for that he empowered border tribes with his own forces .