"Extraordinarily Damaging!" Sarah Hewson Talks 'Racist Royals' Controversy In Omid Scobie's Book

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 490

  • @karencooper1446
    @karencooper1446 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +294

    Sarah you forgot to mention that Harry contradicted his wife in the Oprah Winfrey interview. Please get the facts right. That is an important fact proving that his wife’s claim was incorrect.

    • @lynettefinnigan9540
      @lynettefinnigan9540 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes... otherwise known as A Lie.. same as on Netflix, same as every other time MM opens her mouth... even in court, under Oath!!.... Still lying!!!

    • @JulieFerry-g3m
      @JulieFerry-g3m 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Exactly. I get so frustrated that the link M made to Archie is so wrong. Harry said the conversation was before they were married. Lies lies lies.

    • @conniesanchez3456
      @conniesanchez3456 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      What makes no sense to me is wondering how a baby will look is racist.
      Everyone wonders what the baby’s physical appearance will be the pure projection on Harry’s wife’s past . She wanted the mystery kid to look like Diana & yatch girl was scared it would look like Doria 😂

    • @brendagore1115
      @brendagore1115 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      He said in his english book he would not name the royals in his book strange thing to say in the Dutch book one paragraph are different

    • @DeborahWohlfeld
      @DeborahWohlfeld 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      H&m also let their revelations with Oprah sit in the public domain for 2years!

  • @xhogun8578
    @xhogun8578 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    Oprah didn't challenge it because it suited Oprah's narrative.

    • @Snowflake1374
      @Snowflake1374 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Sensationalism. One sided story. Also disliked the interview she did with MJ.

    • @EileenSpeakman
      @EileenSpeakman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seems like oprah and scooby doo doo both come from the same mould /cesspit? Time that the self exiled rogue prince and his commoner wife are stripped of all titles, including Prince, all names removed from the LOS, And a lifetime restraining order banning mention in any way shape or form of the monarchy and RF. Ditto scooby doo doo..

  • @nilanthiedesilva5361
    @nilanthiedesilva5361 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    British people must put pressure on the authorities to take their titles off.

    • @karenturner7184
      @karenturner7184 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Put the prince title into abeyance

    • @winie9978
      @winie9978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They can take the wife's title but Harry is of Royal bloodline hence impossible to remove "Prince"title.And we both know the drama that can follow if they only took away Meghan's title,for the people that thinks that family is racist that will be a "clear"confirmation.It's crazy and sad to see a family going through this,it can only be solved if they agree to communicate Otherwise there's no end to all this BS

    • @trainer1634
      @trainer1634 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@winie9978prince title can be taken by putting into abeyance. It can be done. Charles can write to parliament. .

    • @winie9978
      @winie9978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@trainer1634 now that some people already believe King Charles doesn't love Harry do you think the King can risk taking that step??

    • @rebeccatrainor734
      @rebeccatrainor734 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally agree

  • @terrymartin7147
    @terrymartin7147 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +301

    I am an African-American grandma with three beautiful mixed grandsons. My daughter-in-law is a very fair, blond, and blue eyed Swede. Both sides of the family discussed the possible genetics of the unborn baby; skin color, hair color and texture, and eye color. These discussions are NOT racist.
    The Duke and Duchess of Duplicity have attempted to blackmail the RF with basically an innocuous
    musing about a mixed child’s skin color. Shame on Harkles for over blowing a conversation held by mixed race families everywhere. This is all much ado about nothing.

    • @lynettefinnigan9540
      @lynettefinnigan9540 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      You are so right 👍👍👍 all my mixed race friends say they all had same conversations, Not racist, just curiosity about the new baby!

    • @lisakeell7343
      @lisakeell7343 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      The book is only a mouthpiece for his puppet master - she failed in the RF and could not stand the success of her sister in law so it has been an orchestrated effort to bring the family down.
      Catherine has a very level headed loving family who brought her up well unlike the California woman. Catherine's great Aunt Harriet Martineau (1802-1876) was an important activist with regard to her long-running campaign for the abolition of slavery in the United States. However, she also occupies an important place in the development of sociology, political economy and women’s rights; she achieved fame as well as an early female journalist. So little 43% Nigerian put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    • @mauricesavel5110
      @mauricesavel5110 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ❤❤❤

    • @vanessabrooks8656
      @vanessabrooks8656 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lynettefinnigan9540 Well said Lynette, a once much loved Prince of the Realm has turned TRAITOR for the love of this woman….history repeating itself it seems.

    • @jp80a68
      @jp80a68 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Thank you for talking sense, all families discuss what future children will look like, we have in ours.

  • @cazza7034
    @cazza7034 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    Poor Catherine ❤ their obsession and jealousy of her is beyond scary now.

    • @katjaxxx7353
      @katjaxxx7353 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Unfortunately narcissist are very dangerous (Meghain).

    • @TRACECTRACY-ll7fw
      @TRACECTRACY-ll7fw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's very dangerous what's next how far will they go

    • @SuperStella1111
      @SuperStella1111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Poor ickle stepford wife

    • @Larisa_Baker
      @Larisa_Baker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She is a bot, trained to perform for the royal circus.

  • @chantalvanwees249
    @chantalvanwees249 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +164

    I feel personally offended as a human for the lengths people go to to make a lot of money for themselves. It is disgusting

    • @katjaxxx7353
      @katjaxxx7353 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      🎯🎯🎯

    • @alicesings1971
      @alicesings1971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Same here. All they care about is 💰

    • @Snowflake1374
      @Snowflake1374 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well said that's exactly what it's all about.

    • @xxx-iz4uq
      @xxx-iz4uq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@alicesings1971All the royal experts, reporters, biographers, tabloids, y tube channels do it every may to Harry & Meghan. They make things up if they have no story. This royal soap opera aka circus has been going on since Charles & Camilla cheated on Diana & the hacked phone call non stop. The UK media is known for this.

    • @newsworthy2082
      @newsworthy2082 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Were you disgusted by the books written by the Royal Rota? They have written multiple books about Harry and Meghan. Where did the Royal Rota receive their information? Priece Morgan called the Royal Family racist before he joined the Royal Rota and received money from them. The Royal Family have been talking through the UK media.

  • @HelenCrossan-vs9ss
    @HelenCrossan-vs9ss 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Time for them to go. Remove all titles from the 4 of them and remove him from councillors of state. They cannot be allowed to come back.

    • @janetharry3621
      @janetharry3621 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yes. Titles should be for Working Members of the Royal family only who Live and Reside in the UK 🇬🇧.

  • @Tracy-sj1vr
    @Tracy-sj1vr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Oprah had a responsibility to nip it in the butt right there and then. Oprah was rather nasty. All families talk about what a baby will look like. The RF embraced Meghan as family. Apparently she saw them as no difference than strangers on the street. But then she just used them, in my opionion, to take what she could get.
    Meghans hatred towards Catherine is disturbing and damaging.

    • @avae5343
      @avae5343 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Oprah is a business woman. She wanted to make more money.

    • @sarahwhyld5596
      @sarahwhyld5596 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You're right. Oprah seems to have distanced herself from the Harkles now though - it really damaged her reputation

    • @maryjanedodo
      @maryjanedodo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      African Americans are never going to pander to a foreign monarchy who enslaved their ancestors & are still spending the interest they made profiting from their exploitation.

    • @ChariCole-c2t
      @ChariCole-c2t 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oprah is a liar per one of her relatives.

  • @Melissa-d8j1u
    @Melissa-d8j1u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +142

    What's infuriating is nutmeg does whatever she wants with no consequences for her actions. When will she be held accountable? 😒

    • @jenniferknipe3410
      @jenniferknipe3410 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That's it, she knows she will always be protected because of harry and in some respect due to the RF.

    • @Romdormer
      @Romdormer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      She IS suffering the consequences. Most people are disgusted by her behaviour. Maybe she doesn't yet realise.

    • @carlyshanks481
      @carlyshanks481 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      When that day comes; that will be the day When "we all dance in the streets" 😂😅

    • @alidabotes6264
      @alidabotes6264 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I also find this troubling!

    • @nicoleyap6070
      @nicoleyap6070 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Money talks!

  • @Rose-jz6ix
    @Rose-jz6ix 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    There is nothing racist about commenting on your unborn family member. Most people do. Eg colour of skin, eye colour, hair colour.

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes; I'm a multiracial Commonwealth citizen myself, and I'm still wondering what the actual "issue" is! Aside from a gaping lack of proof that anything was even said, could someone please explain to me what exactly Oprah and the rest of the world is so extremely shocked about regarding such a sentiment - specifically *why* it is so offensive?? Is it some US sort of 'woke-ism' that I'm missing?

    • @aprilwearsgucci
      @aprilwearsgucci 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Of course not. There's nothing wrong with someone being concerned about how dark a unborn child skin would be.

    • @Laluna0096
      @Laluna0096 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, you are right but you know meghan she want to weaponize this…even if kate didnt say anything she can still make a story about race bait using her poor son..she still want to accuse kate no matter what..her main target is kate.

    • @SuperStella1111
      @SuperStella1111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People know the difference.

    • @xxx-iz4uq
      @xxx-iz4uq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If the intent of what was said & his it was said is tge problem. If you feel accepted and loved in this situation than what you say will be taken differently. Words are powerful. They can make you feel loved and accepted but can also cut like a knife. From the face I saw at cc wedding. And who make who cry shows that she was not accepted. Even the servants treated her like she was less than them.

  • @heathersmith6608
    @heathersmith6608 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Waaagh waaagh waaagh and on we go .Haz and Meg are definitely behind the book .Strip their titles and take them off the Royal website!

  • @MsGuppie2010
    @MsGuppie2010 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Deliberately! Something like this is done on purpose, NEVER by mistake!

  • @donnacardiff2031
    @donnacardiff2031 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Interesting that the two people Meghan and Harry would love to create problems for is the King and Princess Catherine.

    • @joycegibbs5267
      @joycegibbs5267 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      and William and attacking Kate will infuriate him?

    • @SuperStella1111
      @SuperStella1111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joycegibbs5267 doesn’t take much to infuriate Balding Billy. He has serious anger issues.

  • @marsohlala
    @marsohlala 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    What do you expect from Oprah? She’s a dark soul in hollywood.

    • @sisyphussapprentice8976
      @sisyphussapprentice8976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      But a very rich one. Which tells you all you need to know about america

    • @katjaxxx7353
      @katjaxxx7353 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      “What? Whaaaat? Hold on a minute ….”

    • @saulmadrileno8529
      @saulmadrileno8529 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and trafficker! :)

  • @zenaidawalton982
    @zenaidawalton982 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Just ignore it and throw Meghan and Harry forever

    • @magustef8710
      @magustef8710 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @janeyre49
      @janeyre49 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah! A voice of sanity. Thank you!

  • @JFra127
    @JFra127 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    If you are going to discuss this topic go back and review the tapes and use the facts. The one conversation happened when they were seeing each other. Harry’s version contradicts hers and Oprah questions neither version. Now there are 2 racists. One of whom was not at the conversation that Tom Bower reports of in Revenge where he documented this conversation. It’s all manipulation and lies .

    • @bevkaveri3916
      @bevkaveri3916 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yep!

    • @barbarawinterbourne3736
      @barbarawinterbourne3736 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The story changes all the time. This book has the trollop wife of the traitor younger son. Its all old news. The jealousy of the trollop of The princess of Wales is dangerous.

  • @lisakeell7343
    @lisakeell7343 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    The book is only a mouthpiece for his puppet master - she failed in the RF and could not stand the success of her sister in law so it has been an orchestrated effort to bring the family down.
    Catherine has a very level headed loving family who brought her up well unlike the California woman. Catherine's great Aunt Harriet Martineau (1802-1876) was an important activist with regard to her long-running campaign for the abolition of slavery in the United States. However, she also occupies an important place in the development of sociology, political economy and women’s rights; she achieved fame as well as an early female journalist. So little 43% Nigerian put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    • @SuperStella1111
      @SuperStella1111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A distant relation was an activist? 😂 what a reach. 😂

    • @darleenmccauley8220
      @darleenmccauley8220 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      9 O9

  • @cazza7034
    @cazza7034 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    No “concerns” over H marrying a biracial woman? Please stop giving them air time. All BS and gaslighting from the Harkles guys.

    • @katjaxxx7353
      @katjaxxx7353 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🎯🎯🎯 that’s what I say all the time

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you; their vapidity, nastiness and self-aggrandisement are all beyond boring.

  • @angiek6304
    @angiek6304 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Meghan wrote a letter to the King to tell him that he was the racist?

    • @winie9978
      @winie9978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Exactly....so many things are not making sense

  • @MargaretAnderson-ti1sw
    @MargaretAnderson-ti1sw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    My neighbor's cat is having kittens soon. We are enthralled contemplating what they will look like when born. Get it, Meghan?

    • @magustef8710
      @magustef8710 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Gab es eine oder zwei Leihmütter?

    • @margueritahancock5472
      @margueritahancock5472 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very good answer about your cat ...well said😊

  • @annmorrow8533
    @annmorrow8533 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Harry should lose all titles, in turn that's him off the list of succession. He should be disowned, him and his family.

  • @roro-mm7cc
    @roro-mm7cc 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The fact they are saying its Princess Kate makes it far less believable. I could maybe buy it as a Prince Philip gaffe etc.. But it really doesn't make sense at all as something said by someone of Kate's generation and upbringing. I'd eat my hat if this actually happened in the way described.

  • @MetaMM
    @MetaMM 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    These so called friends, do these people have friends? They accused the two specific people that are the Monarchy. Can’t anybody see their goal? I leave it at that.

    • @karenturner7184
      @karenturner7184 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Maybe Eugiene?

    • @MetaMM
      @MetaMM 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@karenturner7184 Come to think of it, but isn’t it too obvious?

    • @harrietkinloch7451
      @harrietkinloch7451 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pure jealousy of Cathartine, M can't live with the fact she'll never be the queen of Britain, ever, so she's out to destroy the very institution she moved heaven and earth to get into, Britain has survived worse than a piece of trailer trash from America, at least Wallis Simpson had some dignity! M doesn't even know what that word means, if she did she'd probably try to claim copyright to it too!

    • @SnowLeopardForever
      @SnowLeopardForever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it’s true, it’s true.

  • @jp80a68
    @jp80a68 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    It's about time someone took omid scobie to court, as his claims are false, you could go two ways, sue him for Libel, it would not need to be the royal family, or he could be charged with treason, the act not only talks about threatening the life of the king and his heirs, but part of the act says if you aid and encourage the kings enemies, especailly those who live outside the realm, you are guilty of treason. The spite and jealousy of the former D list cable actress, is almost unimaginable, yet we see it in this book. This is where desparation leads you. I was already enjoying some of the Karma that has come to her, south park, family guy, being cold shouldered by Hollywood, and real the stars, can't wait to see more, which I am sure is coming.

    • @anthonymorgan2331
      @anthonymorgan2331 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the book is already half the selling price

  • @leejentaylor6195
    @leejentaylor6195 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    she let that book be released so harry didn't go back for xmas - she is a manipulator, a narcissist...hope he divorces her over this

  • @pfksrb
    @pfksrb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The whole world speculated, even had conversations about Archie's skintone and coloring. Guess we're all racist.
    Nowadays, nobody cares about those kids. Just want to give them their privacy.
    Princess catherine will continue to shine!

  • @cathybpz1584
    @cathybpz1584 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    The United States stands with KC and the Princess of Wales.

    • @joycegibbs5267
      @joycegibbs5267 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      hope so because the Harkles and this Scoobie bloke are dangerous.

    • @lindalucia31
      @lindalucia31 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you, we appreciate all of you that stands up for truthfulness and loyalty. H is treasonous.

  • @tracybrown2638
    @tracybrown2638 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The family needs to sue ! Neal Sean said Megan is gloating about what is happening to Kate

  • @aussie_katy
    @aussie_katy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    From someone living in Australia, this latest information about Princess Catherine has not even touched the news at all. I understand that people in England are upset about this 'revelation' and understandably so. However, I think if anyone has been following the Royal Family for any time, they can see that Princess Catherine is a wonderful asset. I don't believe this will harm her or the Royal Family. In a week or two it will be old news and put in the same basket as the last time and not very credible. As like many others I am not sure why Megan and Harry have not come out and asked the question "Who leaked this private letter?" especially as they are generally litigious and have everyone around them sign NDAs..

    • @elainekent7026
      @elainekent7026 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Absolutely spot on. Well said.

    • @Frogbait935
      @Frogbait935 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Our media here in Australia are calling it meghan's book...straight up calling her out...😂😅

    • @margueritahancock5472
      @margueritahancock5472 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Their silence speaks volumes.

    • @lenageidenstam5462
      @lenageidenstam5462 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I can’t see it either (sweden) and the journalist from netherland said so also. We have more importante thing to do. It’s only in UK and US this is an issue.
      The Harkles need to face consequenses, regardless of publicitet. Even if not a word was public, this is severe stalking!!!
      These ladies needs to check their facts before they can say anything. The fact is that one month before the Bradby interview, Harry and Meghan accepted an award ”for fighting racism within the royal family” Whaaaaaaaaaat, Waaaaaaaaaagh OPRAH unconsious bias. What if your’e child was bald?????

  • @willow3203
    @willow3203 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Megan is light skinned but uses bronzer to make herself darker. Harry is light and ginger. Megan never publicly ever express her Blackness before getting engaged. Camilla WAS TECHNICALLY the PRINCESS OF WALES AT THE TIME.

  • @Ladyjillybean
    @Ladyjillybean 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Only a year ago Omid Scobie said the late Queens body was being transported by train. Where did he hear that if not from the Markles

  • @veckulm7670
    @veckulm7670 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Meghan had to throw a wrench into Harry connecting with his father. Meghan has to keep them separated, or Harry might realize he is being played. Meghan either made up the letters to the King, or showed the letters to that thing that wrote this terrible book. I fee for the royal family. How awful.

    • @margueritahancock5472
      @margueritahancock5472 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      According to kinsey Schofield she said the palace aid told her no phone call took place on the kings birthday or a video of their imaginary kids singing happy birthday to King Charles Angela Levine does not believe this phone call ever took place l know who l believe and thats Angela and Kinsey our journalists will play along with all of mm lies and give it front page cover another PR stunt ....now they can say because of this book we are uninvited and playing the VICTIMS AGAIN this will backfire on the TRAITOR and his Disgusting lying wife.

    • @margueritahancock5472
      @margueritahancock5472 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nobody knows for sure if she wrote letters to King Charles she lies about everything but if she did she must have showed them to scobie she said in the oprah interview there was only one racist mm told scobie there were two racists telling him to put King Charles and throw Princess Catherine to the wolves too IMO she hates that King Charles has called Catherine his wonderful daughter in law she is so jealous of Princess Catherine... l really fear for her that TREACHEROUS SPITEFUL LIAR CANT BE TRUSTED...KEEP LOOKING OVER YOUR SHOULDER MM IS A VERY DANGEROUS WOMAN AND HARRY WHO WILL AGREE AND DO EVERYTHING HIS WIFE ASKS HIM TO SAY AND DO... SCAREY.

  • @krahman1074
    @krahman1074 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    So this is what Megsy meant on the variety black carpet: projects for us to enjoy.

  • @elizabethsternal2094
    @elizabethsternal2094 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I don’t think it is damaging - I think most people are eye rolling lay over harry and megan

  • @andyquelch5754
    @andyquelch5754 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The Dutch for Charles and Catherine is Charles and Catherine. It's therefore not an issue with translation. If the names are there, then someone put them there. Didn't they Scobie?

    • @lauriemcfadden4646
      @lauriemcfadden4646 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Princess Catherine of Wales is translated in Dutch to Prinses Catharina van Wales and King Charles III in Dutch is Koning Charles III.

    • @andyquelch5754
      @andyquelch5754 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lauriemcfadden4646 Thanks for that. But I never said it. And her name in Dutch is still Catharine. Because she's not called Catharina.

  • @SellingPalmBeachISL
    @SellingPalmBeachISL 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    how can M be sending a letter to the King about the "2" if he is one of them?

  • @Do.not.judge.
    @Do.not.judge. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Poor Archie and Lilly, these repercussions will be part of their lives.

    • @WMeier-kd8hz
      @WMeier-kd8hz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I read that the same mistake was ,ade with the italian and spanish versions . See what the furture will bring

    • @Romdormer
      @Romdormer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's the saddest part. If Harry thinks he was affected by his own childhood, what on earth does he think he is doing to his own children. This stuff will be on the Internet for ever.

    • @TRACECTRACY-ll7fw
      @TRACECTRACY-ll7fw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do they exist

    • @jacquelinehaury6631
      @jacquelinehaury6631 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Non je ne crois pas trop.c est pas leurs enfants

  • @tracyhuxtable3465
    @tracyhuxtable3465 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    So please tell me why omid is not suing the Dutch publishers or in interviews going after them ?

    • @keithgiblin2636
      @keithgiblin2636 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He looks like he's really enjoying all the fuss!

  • @kayperezwebb2726
    @kayperezwebb2726 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Meghan Markle gave Omid Scobie a gift, which he is wearing now, on the right side in his ear a earring and he always asks photographers to photograph him from this side of his head. He says it’s his best side

    • @xhogun8578
      @xhogun8578 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Is it the side that shows off his plastic surgery best?

  • @stellaallbright4750
    @stellaallbright4750 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The BRF don't need to complain or explain, simply allow Parliament to strike these TRAITORS of their titles. 🎯

  • @rapanepane
    @rapanepane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I’m wondering if book collector will consider the dutch version as treasure or junk. Mindblowing how one version can be so different with others

  • @KitKat-sj4nh
    @KitKat-sj4nh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They accepted an award for standing up to racism in the Royal Family... Why is everyone forgetting this.

  • @Ann-qf5vk
    @Ann-qf5vk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The onus is certainly on This one's wife and this one. Bring it on you despicable pair.

  • @glennet9613
    @glennet9613 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    M and H could have gone to California, done charitable work, been feted by the A list, nipped back to the UK for ceremonial and family occasions as honored guests, written inspiring books and made inspiring documentaries yet they threw it all away - now they are bitter and twisted, endlessly involved in court cases and scandal and being looked on with contempt by the very people they want to impress the most.

  • @TheWorldisSoDivided
    @TheWorldisSoDivided 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Meg’s is overly sensitive and mean-spirited

    • @KateWoodehouse
      @KateWoodehouse 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      She’s also been caught ‘exaggerating’ on other things. She wasn’t married 3 days before she was married. She ridiculously claimed to have been chased by paparazzi all over NYC She claimed her passport and keys were confiscated by the place so she couldn’t go anywhere.

    • @TheWorldisSoDivided
      @TheWorldisSoDivided 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@KateWoodehouse She plays a dirty game

    • @lynettefinnigan9540
      @lynettefinnigan9540 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep..if MMs mouth is moving, it's a lie...

    • @Sophiegunner
      @Sophiegunner 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They all played dirty games. Including the royals.

    • @Romdormer
      @Romdormer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SophiegunnerMaybe I'm naive, but I can't see the advantage to the RF of smearing any of their members at the time.

  • @evangelineLKwan
    @evangelineLKwan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I actually feel sorry for poor Archie. He will grow up thinking his paternal grandfather and auntie are "racist", estranged from his entire extended family and with crazy parents who are hell bent on bringing down his extended family and the monarchy. Dim Harry has indeed really screwed up royally by marrying that piece of work.

  • @barbaraneville5036
    @barbaraneville5036 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    What I think is that The King & The Princess of Wales will be taking Harry & Me Again off the christmas present list

  • @maryy6068
    @maryy6068 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    With Harry and Megain, there is always a calm before the storm. Their history now always appears to be, relationships are getting better, Harry and his dad are speaking, followed up with defamatory false stories and more knives in the back.

  • @pawsoffriendship5007
    @pawsoffriendship5007 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Harry's version during the O interview did NOT match his lying wife.
    Immediately BS !

  • @corky_cork
    @corky_cork 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The 2 traitors could come out and say they had nothing to do with the book. Too late for me and many,many other people …WE WONT BELIEVE THEM.

  • @alycry89
    @alycry89 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thats what narcissists want! They want them to fight back! The crave for that. i think is best if rf dont say anything just take away the titles even from the ghosts children. Enough is enough

  • @marup5245
    @marup5245 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It really is TIME for the Monarchy to make some changes and not just to grey rock them. No matter which way you slice this, Harry and Markle worked directly or indirectly with Scobie in this book.

  • @ak7306
    @ak7306 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is treason to me and should be dealt with in this manner

  • @rupertgale537
    @rupertgale537 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Translating a book or document or article doesn't mean an adding additional copy. No new copy would be added to this book at the translating stage. It looks to me that the original book had these names included until lawyers got involved and they were taken out for the English version. The Dutch version was probably mistakenly sent from an early English version.

    • @Romdormer
      @Romdormer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I query your use of 'mistakenly', but yes.

    • @sandrajayandran
      @sandrajayandran 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, yes and yes

  • @beatedreher5610
    @beatedreher5610 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If I were a journalist I would sit there laughing for 10 minutes and then send a congratulation to the three walking dead for their endgame.

  • @gebdavies
    @gebdavies 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It’s NOT a damaging moment for the Royal Family. All this nonsense is based on a conversation HARRY not MEGAN was party to. SHE NEVER heard the original conversation. She only heard Harry’s interpretation of it. If Harry was part of the original conversation, probably only perfectly normal, harmless comments were made on the potential skin tones of the baby - fair like Harry or olive like Megan, with NO racism intent whatsoever! SO Megan turned Harry’s interpretation into an insult and then strategically INSINUATED racism in the Oprah interview without actually saying the word. The ‘claim’ of racism was made by the press based on a conversation Megan never heard but which she has weaponised against the Royal Family. It’s all illusion. A racist conversation never took place!!!! There can be no long term damage to the Royal Family when it is clear that the basis of this claim is only malevolent, uncontextualised tittle tattle. The Royal Family will rise above this nonsense. Whether Scooby doo or M n H will is less certain .

  • @christineanderson8136
    @christineanderson8136 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    And Catherine wasnt the 'Princess of Wales' at the time.....

    • @sisyphussapprentice8976
      @sisyphussapprentice8976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Valid point, but one that will go over most of the heads of the "baying mob".

    • @rantiafolabi
      @rantiafolabi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It stated King Charles and Princess of Wales...remember Charles wasn't king then....so it was definitely referring to catherine

    • @sisyphussapprentice8976
      @sisyphussapprentice8976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rantiafolabi I get your point, but it doesn't excuse sloppy journalism as he should have referred to Charles as "The then Prince of Wales" and Catherine as "The Duchess of Cornwall". A title she still holds. (Unless they are in Scotland).

  • @CCc-b6r
    @CCc-b6r 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    why did the second reading on the titles bill get thrown out recently

  • @Christine26338
    @Christine26338 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How does Omid Scobie know what happened between the brf the day the queen died if he didn't have an insider to the brf

  • @oghoghomakinde7892
    @oghoghomakinde7892 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Sarah is wrong we aren't holding MeGain and hawwy to different standards. All they have done for years is complain/explain, complain/explain, they must say something they can't cosplay RF's never explain/complain now

  • @meghabisht5401
    @meghabisht5401 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isn't it amazing how Harry and Meghan targeted the most powerful Male ( The King) and female ( Future Queen and mother of future King ) of the royal family.

  • @harrysamuppet6804
    @harrysamuppet6804 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I seem to remember the King remarking when Harry was born that he had the Spencer colouring. Does that make him a gingerist?

  • @lillith069-l3h
    @lillith069-l3h 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Meghan markle wrote this book. Her jealousy over Katherine is scary. They need to go after Markles mother. Why is it always Harry's family? Let's dive into Dorias dirty past

    • @winie9978
      @winie9978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So we go on her level???🙄🙄🙄🙄

  • @suninaries571
    @suninaries571 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The timing is so interesting, just when things were ‘thawing’ between Harry and his family this comes up which will probably cause even more of a rift. Mmmmm feels like this has been done deliberately by someone who wants Harry to continue to be isolated from his friends and family……now who would benefit from that I wonder!!!!

  • @karin4713
    @karin4713 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why M did not say anything about the letter on Ophra show?

  • @bevdavis4148
    @bevdavis4148 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Old American here, I don't believe anything that crazy man says.

  • @yates455
    @yates455 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What "concern"? If the baby's dark it will make the RF look bad? If the baby isnt dark, they wont be able to show how progressive they are? What was the "concern" M was referring to?

    • @annatjienilsen539
      @annatjienilsen539 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is just it. You should read Tom Bower's book. He has a clear description of how it went down and it was not racist at all.

  • @vel230
    @vel230 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MI5 must get involved.....the Markle and Sussex Twitteretts' hatred towards Catherine has become dangerous.

  • @lso5674
    @lso5674 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    1. As many colored.+ white/ginger have confirmed, conversations about color of child is a natural curiosity.
    2. Harry said, it was discussed before they got married
    3. Harry said, they didnt not say RF were rascist
    Why is this being discussed again. It maybe in Endgame but its the same old story.
    I hope Omid is sued.
    Some authors do add more details in books of diff language. I believe Omid did name the person in Dutch version. He is caught and ge has to pay the price.

    • @SnowLeopardForever
      @SnowLeopardForever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes it does make you racist, IF you wondered because you felt it would be bad to have a (royal) child that was black.

  • @aliciaquintero3568
    @aliciaquintero3568 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This scandal is damaging for the two idiots and OS, not for the King or Catherine

  • @teresapeet7146
    @teresapeet7146 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No wonder the late Queen calls Harry's wife 'evil', allegedly or not.

  • @Champagneforever
    @Champagneforever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And then Meghan said around the same time they were told that Archie would not be given a title.
    We can guess who is responsible.

  • @vel230
    @vel230 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Whatever conversation was had, it was Markle who added the word "concerns."

  • @csmith532
    @csmith532 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WHY is no one asking why we are talking about "Archie's skin color" when Harry was clear the conversation happened before they were married, before they were even pregnant? Why is everyone - everyone - suggesting it is something else? So tired of all this so called "journalism".

  • @marisapaola9010
    @marisapaola9010 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The royal family need to question the birth of those two little kids, shes not their natural mum.

  • @gayemarshall5629
    @gayemarshall5629 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Omg. Appalling. When will these traitor's titles be stripped?

  • @SoonerthanLater-d9v
    @SoonerthanLater-d9v 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sarah dont go away stay on the topic harry said meghan did not say that, its the british press who said that. get it right sarah. this is an old issue its the voice of meghan heard all over. the whining and hypocritical duo.

  • @tlw842
    @tlw842 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This will happen again and again and will never end, unless the titles are removed from the Sussexes.

  • @stellaallbright4750
    @stellaallbright4750 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Imho, the right answer is usually the most obvious, Scabies didn't write that bit, Rachel did. 🎯

  • @Tiglath-PileserXIX
    @Tiglath-PileserXIX 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was a translation issue ... period. No one has ever translated Dutch from 43 % Nigerian.

  • @nancywaldman7284
    @nancywaldman7284 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I do not understand why the king does not take away their tittles, especially Megan!!!

  • @karenturner7184
    @karenturner7184 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Reminds me of their nfirst date, they can't get that story straight. We now have this story on the fourth version, the way it is going on it will be more people. The markle is a world renowned liar

  • @terrieferguson6932
    @terrieferguson6932 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    LOL How boringly obvious is this scam, I hope he is prosecuted

  • @christopherarkell9862
    @christopherarkell9862 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    LIES AND CONTRADICTIONS
    The Markle woman stated in the Winfrey interview that there were conversations (more than one) before the birth of Archie about his skin colour.
    Harry said there was ONE conversation about the complexion of Archie BEFORE the wedding.
    Scobie says there are two named Royals who made the comments
    The Markle woman said there was one
    Christopher Andersen wrote in his book Brothers and Wives, published last year, that the Royal who made a comment about Archie’s complexion was King Charles.
    Tom Bower, in his book Revenge, published this year, said that Queen Camilla had wondered what colour Archie’s complexion might be.
    The Charles claim above was dismissed by The Palace. I do not know whether the Palace has commented on Tom Bower’s claim.
    The Dutch edition of Scobie’s book has named King Charles AND the Princess of Wales as speculators on the complexion of Archie. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER for these claims by Scobie. He sources them to Friends of the Markle Woman and claims he never put them in his manuscript.

  • @CharityAgbovi
    @CharityAgbovi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    British Royal pR send the news first some months before now news comes 😂

  • @Allie_Rose
    @Allie_Rose 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We all know the book was written by MeMe, the troll of the century 🧌🧌🧌

  • @gillnewbury4423
    @gillnewbury4423 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There is no proof there is a said letter

  • @darlene6531
    @darlene6531 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In Spare private emails between Meghan and Katherine were printed. Meghan and Harry release what benefits them.

  • @Lovethydogfurr-ever
    @Lovethydogfurr-ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Having a private family light hearted discussion on what features the baby will have from either mom and dad is not racist. No need to comment, explain, or get defensive. The media constantly talking about this is just drawing more and more attention to something that isn’t even a big deal.

    • @SnowLeopardForever
      @SnowLeopardForever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes it does make you racist, IF you wondered because you felt it would be bad to have a (royal) child that was black.

  • @sarahwhyld5596
    @sarahwhyld5596 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I disagree that this is damaging to the Royal family.
    This is only damaging to Scoobie, Harry and 'this ones wife'.
    Once again trying to be nasty.
    People are sick and tired of Harry and Meghan and their greedy, selfish, hypocritical behaviour.

  • @carolewenman4558
    @carolewenman4558 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Theres no surprise shes named Kate the one person that Megan is so jealous and envious of thats why shes accused Kate to hurt her as much as she can or worse destroy her.

  • @lizsim
    @lizsim 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Megain was not even there for that convo yet she seems to know everything.

  • @TRACECTRACY-ll7fw
    @TRACECTRACY-ll7fw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maggot and Hary are very misrable angry people the fact that the Family completely ignores them is tearing them up inside they.left and the Family said have a nice life and they've been mad every since

  • @giusi22
    @giusi22 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    it is not damaging at all because we have no idea what has been said. and i for one don’t believe that witch a single word.

  • @O.O.O.K999
    @O.O.O.K999 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How did the names get in there? Let's see, perhaps the real authors of the book, the dastardly duo of Montecito put them there.

  • @amandaj.barnes5919
    @amandaj.barnes5919 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Time to sue the author, Harry, Meghan for defamation. HRH Catherine and the King have to respond.

    • @winie9978
      @winie9978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let's be real here do you think the RF can sue Harry???

  • @GabrielleH-xi4sl
    @GabrielleH-xi4sl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here's Sarah Hewson, as usual, stating the obvious.

  • @stephanierosewarne3468
    @stephanierosewarne3468 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The books released with the 'names' was a publicity stunt. That's it.

  • @CJC0017
    @CJC0017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's not damaged anyone but meg has and omid

  • @minazalnasky9134
    @minazalnasky9134 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m American, my father is Carpatho-Rusyn and my mother is Scotch-Irish. I’ve been told stories by my aunts they discussed what we would look like. My older brother has auburn hair and green eyes, I’m the middle born with light hair now dark brown with blue eyes, my younger brother is blonde with green eyes.