Good for you for demonstrating the First Law of Thermodynamics. The frictional losses and other losses ensure that his can't work. I commend your demonstration.
This guy is what more people need to be like!!! Very respectful and not attacking others ideas. He is an encouraging like me, can you imagine how much faster we would get the renewable energy figured out if we all were like this guy??????
I tried this when I was six, I thought I was a genius! I had never heard of Albert Einstein... "Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another."
Unlike most other comments here I actually enjoyed this video. Really it's nice to see someone try something instead of just saying "No it can't work" without even trying. Heck someone had made a automated system that would take a wafer board and just build circuits and test to see if they worked and they found a couple that humans apparently just overlooked or jumped past.
+HowardSupra Side note: I haven't been able to find any websites talking about that automated system in quite awhile, if anyone remembers a name or website for it i'd greatly appreciate it.
+Artur Grigio Why? Because people are showing practical examples to others that might not understand? That is an odd condition for physics professors to die under...
Thank you for this honest experiment. Finally a youtuber who doesn't trick anything. Thank you very very very much! Good luck with further ideas and developments.
You did not properly duplicate the theory mentioned by others who claim it works. They supply a a/c to power the motor and supply the caps with d/c from the output motor. The d/c is converted to a/c. I believe that they use a joule thief circuit in between the d/c and a/c converter. I am in no way saying it works because I never tried to see. I just think testing should be properly done before saying if it does or does not work.
Without the shafts coupled together, you can connect the wires together (polarity doesn't matter) and turn the shaft of one motor by hand. Small vice grips work well for this. The shaft of the other motor will rotate, but not as far as the drive motor. Good visual demo of motor/generator losses. And it looks nifty :)
+gametechish .......Superconductivity is simply lowering the electrical resistance of system to zero/near zero. It does not offer MORE energy out than is put in. Plus, as is often forgotten, you have the MASSIVE energy input to get the system cooled to near Absolute Zero in the first place...
+Jc Knight he said efficiency not unlimited energy. Either way I realised after posting that you would need to put this in a vacuum and remove friction.
even in a vacuum it wouldn't work. its efficiency is more based on the physics of electrons. when electrons flow you produce a counter emf which reduces efficiency.
I see someone below finally used the magic phrase: a PERPETUAL MOTION Machine. I created one on paper around 1959. (But never built it.) Everyone that seemed to understand it always said that it would just wind down. And that is something you spoke of. But I keep hoping someone will do succeed in this. And I watch videos like this to keep learning.
+Jonah Beale Yeah, it was a "Cute" video we all know it won't work / all of us 'cept my uncle ...he's STILL working on perpetual motion / and pyramid-power ... or was that "perpetual motion WITHIN pyramids"?
you trying to play with alternative playing with someone broken air conditioning parts how much do you get for dum shit videos separate your alternator's not fan trash like from. ..a .CAR why would this work single faced motors?
I came up with the amazing idea of having a bunch of small motors all around a big motor. The big motor would drive the small motors through belts, with the small motors generating power for the big one. Or was it the other way round? I can't remember, I was about 5 years old at the time :)
First law of Thermodynamics. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted. It is impossible with our current understanding of physics and the universe. Really liked the video though man, you weren't condescending at all- which is what puts people off learning about science and our universe. Hats off to you indeed sir, awesome. Make more!
If they were put in series as in both are parrelel this would potentially work and it wont generate backwards so switching wires wouldnt do it.. If you turn one 180 degrees then the shaft was slightly extended from the back.. The push motor needs to be 1/3- 2/3rds less power needed to run and due to drag the push motor needs a bigger pulley to scale it up on a v-belt the part of using the extra weight is a good idea ..to force momentum to carry on under small load ..the math scale you need is what i described it will work everytime but you must realise : if you use a car alternator it actually needs to run at 12,000-15,000 rpm even though your car charges at 1.5krpm to 2.4krpm approx the fact your drum pulley is scaled larger (so it is the push motor for example) your alternator would be the generator motor and always needs to have a smaller pulley so its rpms achieve its actual rotate to generate RATE ..ok for these systems to work properly youll want to use a regulator or a "buck" or a stepdown that lets you adjust the power going back into your push motor..keep in mind your push motor will heat up so thermal cpu computer paste can be helpful or a fan on it will also help..windmills in my opinion are nearly useless on cost/ efficiency , a waterwheel (longer or larger the pushing wheel is or bigger pulley the more efficient your system will be ..think of a farias wheel pushing a pulley in place of a bicycle pedal and a belt where the back tire used to be on a bicycle with an alternator on that same belt and bungo you have it )is a good way to go given it has more continous torque watts amps rpm caculate what your system is using and its better to have a rechargable battery field example marine batteries..and multiple "bucks" to regulate the power (NASA SHOULD HIRE ME BUT MY PARENTS ARENT FAMOUS ENOUGH the ironey)
Firm or Fast Food ( I hope you arent talking fast food , I was a Quality Assurance Manager for Hardee's corporate, never let proceedure slip or sacrificed customers quality or service experience with product ..customers are always the number one reason and havent ever walked away unsatified bu my performance, but for ethics reasons I'll never work fast food for another company ) or are you just making fun of my choice of character? If you'd like an answer to that : "simply put Gene Wilder gave so much on screen , he's been to all places Mr. Rogers would never go, his spirit lives on with my character creation, the real Willy Wonka was a great man I admire alot. He saved pocket change in his home walls with he beloved wife and children later found his fortune. If you think somehow you are talking to a clown or joker..please be aware & I'll only say this once : I have high score on Stanford Acheivement Tests in catagory; concepts of numbers for State. Also if you say "firm" and actually mean it I hope you have alot of time to dedicate, given I have multiple cases that have a significant statute in civil courts and I can keep you hired for a long time pursuing ..commercial class that should be worth millions..I wouldn't take millions to go through it again ..Lastly tell NASA Im serious , Im not a toy , I am considering the human race the efficiency the environment the production to perfect and the over all budget of each and every customer "Im not looking to get rich, I am more interested in seeing the products take off like computers did in 1995 the technology jumped .(I was part of that to) I missed a chance to work for U.S. Robotics & I would be interested in working for D.H.A.R.P.A but I dont want to have any part in building any type of "killing machine" or have it called "defense" but rather actually be (propaganda) it has to be karmatically sound ..Im* not interested * in any type of machine to harm another human being. However I can teach a robotic arm to farm. I would like help from people who already have the parts I need..thats the major..I dont expect to be paid for an unsucessful product or venture. NOTHING ON A WHIM.
@@americanlivesmatter-BmanWild Ya but did you know that the 1986 sci- fi thriller "Cocoon"..starring Don Ameche And Jessica Tandy Used 100% real cocoons on set during filming...And not only that..but wherever I go..there I am ?... What the fuck are you on about? I was just fuckin with ya but that was a serious explanation...I do have some questions about ecm 142 (GE) motor.if.you might be able to help out I would appreciate it &.I do hope you realize this is giving me stitches from cracking up
John Benton, the sun and the wind give us free energy, but it's not perpetual. It comes and goes. Also, you don't need any equipment to harness the energy from those. You can feel and use the warmth of the sun's energy or the (usual) coolness of the wind's energy (well, more like indirect coolness because of the blowing energy you feel from it -- I was just in HOT wind in Nevada last month, though) without having to do anything except being there. But even if you are going to harness the energy from those two supplies and convert it into electricity, it doesn't matter if the equipment isn't free. That doesn't make the *energy* itself "not free."
This is a good demonstration on how it should work, with the capacitor banks and how important it is to check the positive and negative points. Thanks for this video. I'll use this as a reference with my project.
@@wertiaaudit5746 the reason you don't spin but the drill does is because you are anchored to ground by weight and gravity. In space you have neither. What are pharumetcal drugs?
You know, it's funny because it's obvious why people THINK things like this should work. SO, let's assume that it becomes possible to eliminate all losses (connecting wire/winding resistance, windage, bearing friction, etc.) and a perpetual motion device is created. It should also be CLEAR that a perpetual motion device, IF it were possible, only _BARELY_ works. Therefore *any* attempt to tap into the system and use some of the "recirculating energy" would instantly cause the entire thing to stop functioning. If I had a perpetual motion device running in my garage, right now, it would merely be a _curiosity_ and nothing more than a demonstration toy. We can all break the laws created by men, but we CANNOT bypass the known laws of physics...
if it were possible to get rid of all the losses, what you might have is an efficient battery. I don't expect to see this in any back yard youtube video. edit: now that I think about it, these machines do exist in larger scale. they use a huge flywheel spinning at 10k+ rpm, and can store energy for later use. they're also used to help stabilize ships.
I have an idea for constant energy flow :) Imagine a bunch of water wheels positioned above each other, each one when spinning generates an electrical current not so unlike a wind mill does but with water. At the top is a big basin of water, as the water falls straight down it spins the water wheels generating electrical current. When it reaches the bottom their is another basin, but this one can be shaped some what like an up side down bowl and is slanted down so water flows into areas that are separate and in these areas the water is evaporated and then travels up tubes and back to the top where water re-condenses and falls back down. In these tubes the steam is traveling up through, there is a smaller tube coming down from the top and small windmill like contraptions protruding from it. The rising steam spins these small windmills and generates electrical current that travels through wires in the center of these inner tubes and can either be used for extra energy output or help to heat the bottom bassins or even the tubes themselves so the evaperated water stays evaperated all the way up. The energy to keep the bottom hot enough to evaporate water comes from as many of the water wheels spinning as needed. To get more energy output you just make the contraption taller with more water wheels, It will always only take so many wheels spinning to keep the water on bottom boiling so more wheels equals more energy output. The material in the top basin can be designed as a heat sink to help the water re condense into liquid form, if built correctly, so no water/steam escapes, it just keeps going and going utilizing natural forces to function. If the device was built inefficiently, in that water was escaping from it in small amounts over time. One could easily rectify this issue by attaching a device to the top of it that naturally gathers moisture (Water) from the air and releases it periodically into the system to replenish it. :) Now just add the proper electrical wiring and chargable baterries into its design so all the excess energy being perpetuated can be accessed from plugs on bottom and/or top of device and presto you got yourself free energy.(Free in the sense that you didnt pay for it :) Please share this Idea with Everyone.
If it were possible to build a motor with a magnetic 'floating' bearing, what would be the increase in efficiency? Also, if you're losing heat through the coils, how would something like this with a brushless setup work in comparison to the common brushed variant people are experimentin with?
I was looking for floating electric motors at the iss. Did you see them spinining? what if they spin with magnets near coils? I suposse will produce some energy.......indefinitely
@@KeyDx7 Then place the part in a vacuum chamber. I suppose you would need a perfect vacuum and even then the energy saved from the motor would be lost in the expenditure from keeping the air from the chamber. It's an interesting thought experiment.
You forget not the laws of physics, but the laws of society: no child left behind. They went to school, probably dragged in by the truancy officer, and held the rest of the class back!
Satisfaction Guaranteed That's not true, it's just how impossible is it to find a machine that runs long enough that it could be considered perpetual. I.e. Take advantage of waste energy and produce "free" energy not magic electricity.
Chris Cunningham he knew going in that it wouldn't work as did 90% of his viewers... that 10% that watch other scammers and "new science" and believe anything that says every scientist is part of a global conspiracy was the point in my opinion:) and to test stuff for urself is fun;)
boy_of_srilanka I hear that a lot... dreaming is a good thing, but when u base ur science off fantasy and disbelief ur taking a huge step backwards. facts r still facts;)
Oh this will totally work, as long as there is are no losses. Unfortunately in the real world there are always losses. I think it is the Second law of Thermodynamics that pretty much rules out perpetual motion machines, isn't it? Now Be sure to tune in next week though when we put a windmill on the roof of a car to you know, power the car by the air rushing over the car while it is in motion.
Yep, if everyone just read the laws of thermodynamics there wouldn't be any more silly discussions about perpetual motion machines. As my old boss used to daw about this law, "there's no such thing as a free lunch"
correct. even if the motors released zero heat energy to the surroundings, energy would be lost as entropy is generated. in order to have a perfectly efficient heat to work conversion in a heat engine, you would need something infinity hot and something at absolute zero. since that is impossible, perfect efficiency is impossible. the same concept applies for transferring electrical energy to work
Which is exactly what he's being honest enough to try and show everybody. Unlike the scammers with hundreds of videos of idiotic motor to generator or stupid flywheel crap ideas, this guy is being honest and showing people that it's not possible.
It can create the impression or illusion of self running by using the caps as batteries ... One unity is not possible but free energy is if you pull power from the earth the sun hero thermal and many other free sources
jolllyroger1 pulling power from wind, sun (solar), tides, etc is NOT what we are talking about here, unity +. I guess you think old steam engines are creating energy? LOL
Good demo, I'm sure there will be many people you just wont convince, no matter what you do to make it any more clearer than this, ie, energy out equals energy in minus any losses along the way, Physics 101.
Keep up the great ideas!! It is people who defy the norm and push the boundaries that this country is about. Don't let the corporation keep you in the box they create. Can't wait to see who breaks the laws of physics!
I agree 100% with you but even if we are both wrong and someone gets a motor/generator combination running perpetually, the instant you try to draw a few micoamps from it..................game over.
Perhaps changing the drive ratio. A belt and pulleys drive system. A 2>1 ratio could give you the "driven" speed of the generator shaft at half the "drive" speed of the drive motor shaft. Now think about 10> 1 or 20>1 ratios, how much could that help? I like your idea about using capacitors, perhaps some type of array of capacitors. Set up in a phased array, loading and unloading to supplement the system. unfortunately, the problem always seems to come back to that old adage what's the answer to everything the problem is heat, it causes parasitic loss. Great delivery, very down to earth, and on a personal note. I have to say I like the way you keep your wires. no fancy clips for you, just twist them and go! AWESOME, I love the real world not a stage show. I have always had a interest in this concept, wondering if one could be built. Thanks for the great video, keep up the great work.
Hi poole, yes magnets will unboubtedly be important energy source in the future. Just think how well they might work in outer space with no gravity, less friction. The navy has magnetic guns that are VERY powerful.
the_real_matt yes they are you have to super cool the electrons to give them free flow so they do more work for less out put give you free energy so cool it lol 😆😆😈😨😨😨😨😱😲😲😵
Tidal generators draw energy out of the rising and falling of the waves, reducing their wave size in exchange for energy. Energy is never created or destroyed, merely converted
As long as you dont change the inside workings of a "normal" motor the regular motor is designed to auto destruct the dipole "battery" back emf, lenz law etc. etc. but if you use the back emf & structure the magnetic flux to flow with the current instead of opposing it then maybe just maybe you have a chance
First Law and 2nd Law both say no. it will work only in vacuum with no parasitic energy loss. As soon as you are in real world, there will be frictional and heat loss. Nice work on the demonstration.
that what did you tried self running forget about that you can't get more power because theres heat theres resistance a lot of stuff that will stop it from self running even if you use one stronger motor that won't work resistance will be biger if you do that theres no way that it can produce enough power for light and for moving motor on the left side that will run one on the right
+Shawn E ...Yes...it's wonderful thought experiment as 13 year-old (who didn't pay attention to his 5th Grade science class). But it's just embarrassing to watch grown men seriously attempt this. There is no such thing as a machine or device that creates the same or more energy than it uses....Period.
+Jc Knight I would call it 'fascinating'. No need to attack the author. If he has the time on his hands to bust a myth... why not? MythBusters do it all day. :)
+Shawn E ....There is a good reason to attack people like this. Many of them attempt to dupe people by investing in their schemes. They are no better than charlatan preachers stealing little old lady's money by offering them "salvation". The problem is, he's not busting the myth. Not even close. Nor do many of the other thousands of people who post their "perpetual motion" machines on TH-cam. Every single one has an external power source ADDING more energy than it's taking out. That's the opposite of "free energy". And MythBusters CONSTANTLY talk about the impossibility of perpetual motion machines. There's a standing $10 Million dollar prize for anyone who can demonstrate a working perpetual motion device. No one has claimed it. Why do you think that is? These "inventors" just don't like Money?
+Jc Knight I was a very smart kid. 5th grade science is when the science teacher laughed at me when I presented this idea. 10th grade catholic school for smart kids around 1977, during the oil embargo times, the Father said the closest thing man made to 100% efficiency was a Canon pump. Back in those days while driving thru the country and big farms you would hear this thing go off like a canon, hence aptly named canon pump. It would build up water pressure to a super high level and then bang, shoot it down the pipes for miles. I see little info about it on the net now and have not heard one in decades. Technology must have surpassed it. However to create more than goes in is a joke
I tried this way back in my teens. The fly wheel idea with a battery pack (not capacitors) to help hold and control the "extra voltage" did work for a while but it does eventually stop. Even tried putting a gear box between a smaller "drive" motor and the generator motor. Same results. I even went as far as building my own generator to deliver more power than the motor I was using as a generator. Had some interesting generator designs......, but anyway, same results. Trying to achieve over unity might be able to be done. But it didn't happen for me. Next Batter may step up and take a swing!
This was going to be my post then I read your message and thought I'd put it here instead, lol. I think we talking about the same thing, I'm interested to know why it didn't last and how long you were getting out of it. This was my post; Isn't the idea to use an alternator & electric motor? or 2 alternators (with one being reversed as a motor)? Basically if you have a large and powerful alternator that's connected to some sort of Large battery Block or powercell etc... That could run your home and be kept charged by the alternator when needed. Any reason why you couldn't just attach an electric motor (that uses the same powercell/battery block for power) to spin the alternator that keeps everything powered up & charged. Why wouldn't that setup work? apart from some in efficiency issues that could surely be resolved with some clever thinking? Surely someone has tried this and there is a major flaw I'm missing that means it can't work?
The first thing you will notice if you build your own "motor to same size motor" set up is that when no electricity is being demanded from the motor/generator, the drive motor will have no trouble turning it. But as you demand more juice from the generator the drive motor will be bogged down until the same energy the drive motor needs to turn equals the power output of the generator. The system then ceases to function. That's why I tried fly wheels and even gearing to lessen the torque on the drive motor while trying to maximize torque on the generator. Same thing happens. With multiple generators the negative effect on the drive motor gets worse per generator attached. The only thing I could do was lengthen the discharge time on a battery pack by "trickle charging" the pack as it was used to power the drive motor. I did that a very long time ago and my notes on it have long since been thrown out so I can't quote everything specifically. There may be some way to get this thing to work. Concentrate on this: each part of a system like this has a weakness that effects the efficiency of another (or next phase) part of the system. Finding parts that can compensate (ideally OVER compensate) it's weakness to the next part of the system is key to doing this. Research, build, test, find the flaws, repeat. I hope for the best of luck to you. We have to get something working sometime!
Thanks for the reply mate I appreciate it & yeah I agree we do too... Think the answer lie's with more natural resources like water. I always remember Nikola Tesla's quote on how waterfalls are the most resourceful & productive way of creating energy. So If you have this or a running water flow on your property you're already in business, but I can't see why anyone couldn't set this up with a makeshift dam, or large water tank, that feeds down and through a turbine that ultimately powers your generator, then using some sort of ram pump system to feed the water back through making it self sustaining as long as you have enough water pressure. Even having that other set up we talked about as a back up etc... That's probably what I'll be looking at doing, something like that I'm thinking. Thanks for your help :)
LOL! I did that project about a water source running a generator that feeds water back to the source! Thinking alike here! What I did with my nephew was: 5 gallon water bottle (water source) running a 4 foot drop to a small motor (generator)ending in a spill pool. At first we had a small pump hooked to the generator but ran into the same problem as the motor-motor design. We decided just to "make it work", ran to Radio Shack for a few small solar panels (the small kit sized ones), then had the solar panels run several small pumps to feed the spill pool water back to the source. Worked fine though defeated the purpose. Just seeing results was exciting for my young nephew so he was pretty proud. Sometimes seeing something you build like this can give you future ideas. NEVER be afraid to try something even if you think you will fail. That failure may lead to new ideas that may work.
This can be done. Loads of people have done it and it's not that difficult. I have managed to knock up a rough model. I might refine it in the future when I have more time. It's no big deal, there are loads of free energy machines out there. These types of machines are a little bit primitive now compared to the pure electronic generators which have no moving parts. The reason why this experiment was not successful, is because there is no potential difference in the design.Thats to say that everything is locked together, so there's no opportunity for it to freewheel and gather momentum. You also need some very simple electronics to make it work. The best ones are purpose built, so that all the coils,magnets,electronics etc, are all built into the flywheel, and they run on extremely low friction bearings. I made my (slap generator) as I called it, as school science project when I was 13 years old.I am now 58 years old. Believe me when I say, free energy machines have been discovered, built, and shelved. The governments of the world don't want us to have this simple technology. People have been threatened and even killed in order to keep it under wraps. They use bits of it occasionally for example, in some states of the US, all the emergency vehicles are powered by hydrogen. In certain parts of New Zealand they have ariels that absorb very usable electricity from the atmosphere, Tesla style, but they've had that since the seventies but there are many more examples. Peace to you.
Don't make fun my friend. What most people don't take into account, is that while many things have advanced over the years, science theory has not. Science has not moved with the times, and many of the old theories ARE WRONG. Scientists even know this but continue to try and make it fit into the modern things that they are working on. It's just sheer pride laziness and arrogance on their part. If I was struggling with a project for years and someone gave me all the answers on a plate, I'd be extremely grateful. I have previously offered to share the theory of my machine with someone on youtube, but I will only do this via email. I have posted things on youtube in the past and have had so many questions, that I couldn't cope with them and just don't have the time to answer them all.
gonojah ibitham. I am currently traveling,but as soon as I am back home and settled in a few days and have more time, I will drop you an email. It's good to hear from someone who's serious and interested.
Hi, I have also been working on a similar project but was only successful with low volts dc motors. Could you share your ideas with me please? My email address is ladikajola@gmail.com. Thanks.
This is how all the overunity videos should look if they were doing it as they say lol, KUDOS for showing people the reality of physics and why we don't all fly off the planet.
9 ปีที่แล้ว +8
well, of course it doesn't work. you're using the wrong capacitors! it will self-run only with flux capacitors. but that will be only a 1 to 1 power ratio. no over-unity. for over-unity you need naquadah magnets. duh... ;))
You cannot break the laws of physics. They are not like mankinds laws, they are impossible to break unless under impossible conditions (I.E. quantum physics).
One electric motor turning two generators charging in parallel with batteries in series. Charge the battery at the same rate that it drains and the electric motor should run constantly. If a hose outputs 1 gallon per minute, and the bucket empties at 1 gal per minute, the fluid level in the bucker remains constant. : )
There's no reason to beat around the bush, self-running IS impossible because it violates the Law of Conservation of Energy, and the laws of Thermodynamics amongst others. The only way you could have a self-running system is if they are 100% efficient, which is impossible. There are always going to be internal and external losses: Friction, internal resistance, viscous damping, and much more. Even if the system is 99% efficient, there will be a 1% decrease in energy output vs input, meaning this system will not self-run. So if you have a 100 W motor driving a 100 W generator, which is powering this motor, the only way they could self-run is that if this system is 100% efficient and the entire 100 W from the generator is sent to the motor. In reality, when the generator produces 100 W, the motor would probably see 80 W or below depending on how well constructed the motor and generator is and the next cycle, it would be 64 W and so on until 0. It maybe possible to get really efficient motors/generators via superconductivity etc but even then, it won't be 100%.
it needs to be done with a 2 hp 6000 rpm dc motor with reduced speed by a gear ratio of 5:1,which will increase the torque 5 times to making a total of 7456 watts and reduce the speed 5 times slower to run a 10kW generator. Your draw to the motor will be 1491.4 watts and the voltage is 180 volts dc, which should be 8.29 amps, and, the generator output will have 220 volts AC with 7456 watts max load and a current capability of 33.9 amps maximum (I'd put a 30 amp breaker maximum, maybe even limit it at 25 amps to reduce wear on the motor. The generator will have to use a bridge rectifier with 30 amp alternator diodes (cheapest) , then, a buck converter to drop the rectifed voltage which will be nearly 300 volts DC back down to about 210 volts dc to loop back to the batteries running the prime mover (180 vdc motor) When connecting the buck converter, be sure to connect a light bulb across the positive and negative of the feed to the buck converter to get rid of additional voltage spikes created by the generator if it is not an induction style generator. Standard generators make too many spikes as it is too dirty so, when you have a dc motor operating at a very high rpm, this may also produce unwanted spikes that will destroy the buck converter which is sensitive to spikes. If you use an inverter, the same thing will need to be done, adding a light bulb. Check out Jesse McQueen's patent as it works and does so very well. The motor, inverter, generator, and buck converters as well as the necessary wires are all very expensive but worth it for free electricity. The motor is easily $2500-$4000 for a very good 6000 or 7000 rpm 180 vdc motor. This system works perfectly in a self loop mode. Good luck building it as parts are scarce and expensive!
That law had being violated long ago, no longer a virgin , first prof is stochastic resonance over-unity gain in crystal latices , Ein + e↓ = Over-unity
There's way too many people currently suppressing the technologies at the moment by shielding the overunity element with the physics books that the current limitations in physics have made anybody creating an overunity look like madmen. I have been working with systems now for 10 years and have cleverly released many devices that show this overunity very clearly, however, science has come up with some sort of wording to shred even one ounce of possibility of my developments by telling everybody these devices have been long ago been debunked when they never have even existed before. I'm sure you've encountered the same problem where guys like Erik Krieg have complete nonsense to say about a perpetuum device like the man in Italy with his giant Ferrous wheel he created (A machine To Die For) . It obviously runs by itself due to the transfer of weight from the bottom to the top of the wheel, but, when there is any reasonable doubt, such as Erik stated it could be running from the wind, science puts this flaw in front of anybody and sets it aside from reason so nobody will again speak of it. It isn't fair as new technologies are being buffered from society for what? To continue to allow the use of fuel, and it is damn pathetic as we are in a race to find a technology to replace fuels and there have been several devices that work but never have been released to stop the chance to create and then sustain a fuel free society and it really sucks. If anybody, our government should stand by our inventors and protect their developments because they are all the work and needs of tomorrow. Without the private inventions out there provided by the world's smartest people, the continuation of our world will be impossible and we will all need to get our heads together in the same space to put together thoughts to overcome this ridiculous greed and jealousy that has now been damping our abilities to prevail, which has been happening now for hundreds of years.
I knew an auto mechanic years ago who actually believed that he could design an eight cylinder engine, four large cylinders to act as an air compressor into a storage tank to drive four smaller cylinders in a two cycle configuration using compressed air instead of expanding gases from burning fuel. The idea was to charge the on board air storage tank initially from a shop compressor and once the "engine" was put into motion, it would sustain itself into eternity on it's own regenerating compressed air supply. The only maintenance it would need was to keep the oil clean but because it didn't run as hot as an internal combustion engine, the oil would last considerably longer. That and replacing bearings, piston rings ect. as they wore out. He wouldn't listen when I tried to explain to him that the pressures that he could practically develop in this fashion would be much lower than normal combustion chamber pressures and could NOT sustain itself let alone that AND move an automobile too but this is how innovation happens. It comes from people who reach for the unattainable but settle for more than what's available.
What I like most about this video is you refer to motors, as motors, which they are, while every video talking about engines refers to them as motors. Duh my 440 motor or my Big Block Motor. Motors are electric and every car show on T.V. Refers to engines as MOTORS. Motoring?
Two asynchronous motor, sccording to Tesla, should be able to run with a capacitor in between the wires. Try out different connections of the wires, but you should give the inicial push.
omg , Tesla was a visionary, instead of pursuing radio he spent his whole life trying to transmit free energy through space. Marconi then picked up on the radio and made a fortune. Tesla died in poverty. his only true claim to fame was magnetic flux was named after him. I have great respect for Tesla, it's just when people misquote his ideas that you can create energy from from f all that really make people look and sound ridiculous.
you can never make 1 to 1 work (head to head) different size pulley's side by side will give you results.. example 2 to 1 drive pulley turning 2 rotations for every one given will give you excess power to run other things. this is the equivalent of a driveshaft in a car. the drive shaft rotates at 4 to 1, driveshaft turns 4 times to rotate a wheel once.. in high gear drive is 1 to 1 and overdrive is 1.5 over a 1 to 1 ratio so it has been proven.. its not simple as this video.. i still can't figure out why the government does not put windmills on the highways..ever break down and walk home? the trucks that drive by make wind that will knock you over...why waste the wind energy...everyone is just not looking in the right places for free energy
You cannot create energy out of nothing and you can't circulate energy in the form of electricity into induction, into kynetic energy, back into induction and then back into electricity indefinitely. No matter if there's more capacitors or no matter what the turn ratios are. Wind turbans need to be huge to be efficient and by the way, that's not what this video is talking about when it says "free" energy. This video is showing that perpetual motion is impossible. Meaning that whatever energy you initially have will dissipate without any additional energy from outside the system. Wind turbines are not creating its own energy. It gets its energy from the wind.
I can't believe people are so motherfucking stupid that they think this can work. And just saying TESLA is not some magic word that turns ignorant bullshit stories into truth
We are trying the same thing, with puting some strong Magnet. We'll activate the magnet with a strong spark going to a coil. We expect that the brief spark of energy will generate a strong trust to the magnet that will ad momentum. This way we could create an over unit of energy that can be either reused immediately or stocked into a cynetic weel. What we need is a periodic spark that will accelerate as the speed will increase.
Many thanks for making this video, it show the laws of physics, you cant get out more than you put in! This is a wonderful example of how it cant work, anyone fighting this is off there nut, the only way this can possibly have a chance would be a vacuum with magnetic bearings at zero Kelvin using super conductors, but all that is going to take a small power station to make to correct environment to have the 10 watt motor and generator run. Back to school for anyone arguing !!!
Motors are fun to play with. If you connect the two in series and load down one, the other will speed up and run faster. You can find ways get energy off the motors while they run. Wire a capacitor and a LED light across the motor connections in both directions and they will light up and the motor will run just as well. But, over unity is never possible.
Thank you for this video. First, I want to give you a thumb up for the humble way you express yourself. That is to me a very good sign of a serious presenter. Now physics. I have seen many videos about "greater than unity" (right words??) machines. I miss some really good explanations from the producers HOW they did. I have never seen any proper schematics presented either. Even videos where the actual demonstration was not a demonstration of a "perpetuum mobile"., but merely some electrical experiment, I saw. Even if I am a classic researcher (applied physics) I am open to some stuff that we cannot prove, but have been PROPERLY experimentally shown. However, the motor-generator thingy, I do not buy that. First law of thermodynamics. Just a little reasoning here: ASSUME that we can make more energy than we put in to the system. I said ASSUME! I also assume that we believe in Einstein's formula that E=mc^2. The old smart guy said that energy equals to mass. My conclusion: Then the motor-generator setup can make mass. Oops, what would happen to Universe? These thoughts have been produced just now. No deeper philosophy.
After reading some of the comments I also became convinced that this will work for sure, all you need is a 100 watts or less motor that can produce 1 hp or more. I swear that I'll make it work if someone can find such machine. Off to the junk yards of the world lads...
you didn't look the whole picture..why there's so many capacitor on that table?..and it might be connected for those motor, for knowledge...capacitor and inductor(motor) connected parallel can create flywheel effect(unlimited energy) but need to supply it by enough energy...please everyone contribute not to criticize or negative on this. Think there's so many individual wanting our life easier and study what ever aspect that may contribute in our society. Appreciate their doing!!!
A friend of mine had an electric motor on it that he had wired so that as it ran it would self charge the batteries, but i'm not sure what he did to modify it exactly. But that is a good experiment just to see if they would do the task! :)
Maybe this will help to stop the stupidity. My step brother thought he was gonna be smart and do this back in the 70'es. I understood back then why it wasn't gonna work
The fun thing with such setup is that it is theoretically equally effetive as only use one motor and a flywheel. When motor is connected to generator and back to motor, there is no way to distinglish what is generator and what is motor. So we can probably get a slightly better performance if we just remove one of the enginges and we will not loose energy from unbalance and friction in the removed motor. It all boils down to law of conservation of energy...
That as well as a lager motor and a couple of one way diodes. I thought of that too. Doesn't make since to remove the battery because the motors need a constant flow of current to work right?? Not sure I never took physics
The principle behind this is actually quite easy to understand: Imagine if you didn't have any motors there's an equilibrium of energy that sum up to 0. If you have any realistic engine there will be losses, and so the equilibrium of energy ends up being 0 but some of that energy isn't going to power to engine and is actually being loss by friction, heat, and other electrics losses. Two motors of same efficiency will have double the losses as one motor, they should stop each other rather quickly once both are off the grid. you can't do like a electronic turbine that makes this thing spool up without fuel, or in an electron point of view, batteries or any outer source of power
Good for you for demonstrating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
The frictional losses and other losses ensure that his can't work.
I commend your demonstration.
This guy is what more people need to be like!!! Very respectful and not attacking others ideas. He is an encouraging like me, can you imagine how much faster we would get the renewable energy figured out if we all were like this guy??????
I tried this when I was six, I thought I was a genius! I had never heard of Albert Einstein...
"Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another."
Unlike most other comments here I actually enjoyed this video. Really it's nice to see someone try something instead of just saying "No it can't work" without even trying. Heck someone had made a automated system that would take a wafer board and just build circuits and test to see if they worked and they found a couple that humans apparently just overlooked or jumped past.
+HowardSupra Side note: I haven't been able to find any websites talking about that automated system in quite awhile, if anyone remembers a name or website for it i'd greatly appreciate it.
everyone needs to be more like this guy , honest and unstopable.
I like that he already knew what the results would be but did all of this just for fun
"But this SHOULD work!"
Electricity doesn't care
about your feelings.
Dear kurtscottage thank you. I was tired with "clever" guys who "make" perpetual mobile machines.
at least it's true, and not another fake.
THANK YOU GOD for someone who ISN'T trying to bullcrap people into thinking they can get something for nothing!!! Keep up the good work, really.
Every time a video like this is posted, a physics professor dies.
+Artur Grigio one dislike = 1 professor
+Artur Grigio Why? Because people are showing practical examples to others that might not understand?
That is an odd condition for physics professors to die under...
+Prehistoricman if we dislike enough can we get professor Xaiver?
+Artur Grigio Actually Cal-Tech professor Feynman loved perpetual motion machine builders. Debunking magic was a fun thing for him.
+Artur Grigio Arthur, in an universe far far away at a far far away time this might actually work, LOL
Thank you for this honest experiment.
Finally a youtuber who doesn't trick anything. Thank you very very very much!
Good luck with further ideas and developments.
You did not properly duplicate the theory mentioned by others who claim it works. They supply a a/c to power the motor and supply the caps with d/c from the output motor. The d/c is converted to a/c. I believe that they use a joule thief circuit in between the d/c and a/c converter. I am in no way saying it works because I never tried to see. I just think testing should be properly done before saying if it does or does not work.
Please reread my comments (I revised).
Testing? You mean like dropping a rock and expecting it to fly upward?
Exactly. That's what happens after hitting the ground, it's called bounce.
True,, he didn't duplicate it. He forgot to sprinkle the magic fairy dust on it... Lol
Without the shafts coupled together, you can connect the wires together (polarity doesn't matter) and turn the shaft of one motor by hand. Small vice grips work well for this. The shaft of the other motor will rotate, but not as far as the drive motor. Good visual demo of motor/generator losses. And it looks nifty :)
i dont even have to see the results to know this didnt work
efficiency can never be 100%
+gametechish .......Superconductivity is simply lowering the electrical resistance of system to zero/near zero. It does not offer MORE energy out than is put in.
Plus, as is often forgotten, you have the MASSIVE energy input to get the system cooled to near Absolute Zero in the first place...
+Jc Knight he said efficiency not unlimited energy. Either way I realised after posting that you would need to put this in a vacuum and remove friction.
even in a vacuum it wouldn't work. its efficiency is more based on the physics of electrons. when electrons flow you produce a counter emf which reduces efficiency.
+jason stout read previous post
so you think that can violate the conservation of energy law?
I see someone below finally used the magic phrase: a PERPETUAL MOTION Machine. I created one on paper around 1959. (But never built it.) Everyone that seemed to understand it always said that it would just wind down. And that is something you spoke of. But I keep hoping someone will do succeed in this. And I watch videos like this to keep learning.
I'm 9999% sure this guy knew it wasn't gonna work.
Why all the dislikes?
+Jonah Beale Yeah, it was a "Cute" video
we all know it won't work /
all of us 'cept my uncle ...he's STILL working on perpetual motion / and pyramid-power ... or was that "perpetual motion WITHIN pyramids"?
@7:04 he's not saying it's impossible. Meaning he thinks someone, somewhere will work out how to make it happen.
you trying to play with alternative playing with someone broken air conditioning parts how much do you get for dum shit videos separate your alternator's not fan trash like from. ..a .CAR why would this work single faced motors?
@@jessepaulsen2339 ... .u
Thanks. Way too many people online setting up complicated versions of this setup pretending to show over unity.
I came up with the amazing idea of having a bunch of small motors all around a big motor. The big motor would drive the small motors through belts, with the small motors generating power for the big one.
Or was it the other way round? I can't remember, I was about 5 years old at the time :)
You need to be five to see the logic in this kind of setup. As you get older you become stupid and stop believing that this will work.
This is the most realistic video of this kind i ever watched.
Very well explained, there is nothing like "just-try-it" and "see-by-yourself". Great video, well done!
First law of Thermodynamics. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted. It is impossible with our current understanding of physics and the universe. Really liked the video though man, you weren't condescending at all- which is what puts people off learning about science and our universe. Hats off to you indeed sir, awesome. Make more!
If they were put in series as in both are parrelel this would potentially work and it wont generate backwards so switching wires wouldnt do it.. If you turn one 180 degrees then the shaft was slightly extended from the back.. The push motor needs to be 1/3- 2/3rds less power needed to run and due to drag the push motor needs a bigger pulley to scale it up on a v-belt the part of using the extra weight is a good idea ..to force momentum to carry on under small load ..the math scale you need is what i described it will work everytime but you must realise : if you use a car alternator it actually needs to run at 12,000-15,000 rpm even though your car charges at 1.5krpm to 2.4krpm approx the fact your drum pulley is scaled larger (so it is the push motor for example) your alternator would be the generator motor and always needs to have a smaller pulley so its rpms achieve its actual rotate to generate RATE ..ok for these systems to work properly youll want to use a regulator or a "buck" or a stepdown that lets you adjust the power going back into your push motor..keep in mind your push motor will heat up so thermal cpu computer paste can be helpful or a fan on it will also help..windmills in my opinion are nearly useless on cost/ efficiency , a waterwheel (longer or larger the pushing wheel is or bigger pulley the more efficient your system will be ..think of a farias wheel pushing a pulley in place of a bicycle pedal and a belt where the back tire used to be on a bicycle with an alternator on that same belt and bungo you have it )is a good way to go given it has more continous torque watts amps rpm caculate what your system is using and its better to have a rechargable battery field example marine batteries..and multiple "bucks" to regulate the power (NASA SHOULD HIRE ME BUT MY PARENTS ARENT FAMOUS ENOUGH the ironey)
Hello Mr wonka..
Not nasa here but I am the manager at jack in the box!!
can you come in for a interview?
Firm or Fast Food ( I hope you arent talking fast food , I was a Quality Assurance Manager for Hardee's corporate, never let proceedure slip or sacrificed customers quality or service experience with product ..customers are always the number one reason and havent ever walked away unsatified bu my performance, but for ethics reasons I'll never work fast food for another company ) or are you just making fun of my choice of character? If you'd like an answer to that : "simply put Gene Wilder gave so much on screen , he's been to all places Mr. Rogers would never go, his spirit lives on with my character creation, the real Willy Wonka was a great man I admire alot. He saved pocket change in his home walls with he beloved wife and children later found his fortune. If you think somehow you are talking to a clown or joker..please be aware & I'll only say this once : I have high score on Stanford Acheivement Tests in catagory; concepts of numbers for State. Also if you say "firm" and actually mean it I hope you have alot of time to dedicate, given I have multiple cases that have a significant statute in civil courts and I can keep you hired for a long time pursuing ..commercial class that should be worth millions..I wouldn't take millions to go through it again ..Lastly tell NASA Im serious , Im not a toy , I am considering the human race the efficiency the environment the production to perfect and the over all budget of each and every customer "Im not looking to get rich, I am more interested in seeing the products take off like computers did in 1995 the technology jumped .(I was part of that to) I missed a chance to work for U.S. Robotics & I would be interested in working for D.H.A.R.P.A but I dont want to have any part in building any type of "killing machine" or have it called "defense" but rather actually be (propaganda) it has to be karmatically sound ..Im* not interested * in any type of machine to harm another human being. However I can teach a robotic arm to farm. I would like help from people who already have the parts I need..thats the major..I dont expect to be paid for an unsucessful product or venture. NOTHING ON A WHIM.
@@americanlivesmatter-BmanWild Ya but did you know that the 1986 sci- fi thriller "Cocoon"..starring Don Ameche And Jessica Tandy Used 100% real cocoons on set during filming...And not only that..but wherever I go..there I am ?...
What the fuck are you on about? I was just fuckin with ya but that was a serious explanation...I do have some questions about ecm 142 (GE) motor.if.you might be able to help out I would appreciate it &.I do hope you realize this is giving me stitches from cracking up
I am not a critic, I liked, and appreciate it.
LOL, no matter how advanced our world gets, there are still people trying this stuff. Huh?
Thanks, tramdr (Tram Doctor?) for your +1!
+MaxxFordham The energy may be free (and perpetual) but the equipment to collect it isn't. It's like death and taxes; inevitable.
John Benton, the sun and the wind give us free energy, but it's not perpetual. It comes and goes. Also, you don't need any equipment to harness the energy from those. You can feel and use the warmth of the sun's energy or the (usual) coolness of the wind's energy (well, more like indirect coolness because of the blowing energy you feel from it -- I was just in HOT wind in Nevada last month, though) without having to do anything except being there.
But even if you are going to harness the energy from those two supplies and convert it into electricity, it doesn't matter if the equipment isn't free. That doesn't make the *energy* itself "not free."
+MaxxFordham jup... kinda sad isn't it?
Heheh, FrozenHaxor.
This is a good demonstration on how it should work, with the capacitor banks and how important it is to check the positive and negative points. Thanks for this video. I'll use this as a reference with my project.
resistance will eventually eat up all of the power.
Party pooper
What about in space
@@wertiaaudit5746 I wonder if, not tethered in space, if you pull the trigger on a bat. Drilll do you spin as fast as the drill chuck?
@@gookumpucky4842 are you on pharumetocal drugs , those nanobots are effecting with your brainwavss
@@wertiaaudit5746 the reason you don't spin but the drill does is because you are anchored to ground by weight and gravity. In space you have neither. What are pharumetcal drugs?
good job Kurt... you should call liars liars.. but you are a good man and admit you do not know everything... I liked this video..
You know, it's funny because it's obvious why people THINK things like this should work. SO, let's assume that it becomes possible to eliminate all losses (connecting wire/winding resistance, windage, bearing friction, etc.) and a perpetual motion device is created. It should also be CLEAR that a perpetual motion device, IF it were possible, only _BARELY_ works. Therefore *any* attempt to tap into the system and use some of the "recirculating energy" would instantly cause the entire thing to stop functioning. If I had a perpetual motion device running in my garage, right now, it would merely be a _curiosity_ and nothing more than a demonstration toy. We can all break the laws created by men, but we CANNOT bypass the known laws of physics...
if it were possible to get rid of all the losses, what you might have is an efficient battery. I don't expect to see this in any back yard youtube video. edit: now that I think about it, these machines do exist in larger scale. they use a huge flywheel spinning at 10k+ rpm, and can store energy for later use. they're also used to help stabilize ships.
I have an idea for constant energy flow :) Imagine a bunch of water wheels positioned above each other, each one when spinning generates an electrical current not so unlike a wind mill does but with water. At the top is a big basin of water, as the water falls straight down it spins the water wheels generating electrical current. When it reaches the bottom their is another basin, but this one can be shaped some what like an up side down bowl and is slanted down so water flows into areas that are separate and in these areas the water is evaporated and then travels up tubes and back to the top where water re-condenses and falls back down. In these tubes the steam is traveling up through, there is a smaller tube coming down from the top and small windmill like contraptions protruding from it. The rising steam spins these small windmills and generates electrical current that travels through wires in the center of these inner tubes and can either be used for extra energy output or help to heat the bottom bassins or even the tubes themselves so the evaperated water stays evaperated all the way up. The energy to keep the bottom hot enough to evaporate water comes from as many of the water wheels spinning as needed. To get more energy output you just make the contraption taller with more water wheels, It will always only take so many wheels spinning to keep the water on bottom boiling so more wheels equals more energy output. The material in the top basin can be designed as a heat sink to help the water re condense into liquid form, if built correctly, so no water/steam escapes, it just keeps going and going utilizing natural forces to function. If the device was built inefficiently, in that water was escaping from it in small amounts over time. One could easily rectify this issue by attaching a device to the top of it that naturally gathers moisture (Water) from the air and releases it periodically into the system to replenish it. :) Now just add the proper electrical wiring and chargable baterries into its design so all the excess energy being perpetuated can be accessed from plugs on bottom and/or top of device and presto you got yourself free energy.(Free in the sense that you didnt pay for it :) Please share this Idea with Everyone.
Rube Goldberg approves and abides.
@@GoingGoneGalt i read that whole thing waiting for a punchline. did i miss it?
it just won't work without a Flux capacitor!
That is right Sean and it won't work with one either!
God willing, your work is good. I wish you success in the future
If it were possible to build a motor with a magnetic 'floating' bearing, what would be the increase in efficiency? Also, if you're losing heat through the coils, how would something like this with a brushless setup work in comparison to the common brushed variant people are experimentin with?
I was looking for floating electric motors at the iss. Did you see them spinining? what if they spin with magnets near coils? I suposse will produce some energy.......indefinitely
@@KeyDx7 Then place the part in a vacuum chamber. I suppose you would need a perfect vacuum and even then the energy saved from the motor would be lost in the expenditure from keeping the air from the chamber. It's an interesting thought experiment.
HOORAY for the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics!
People who believe perpetual motion machines are possible: C- in physics
ppl who believe in perpetual motion have never been to school to begin with
You forget not the laws of physics, but the laws of society: no child left behind. They went to school, probably dragged in by the truancy officer, and held the rest of the class back!
Satisfaction Guaranteed
That's not true, it's just how impossible is it to find a machine that runs long enough that it could be considered perpetual.
I.e. Take advantage of waste energy and produce "free" energy not magic electricity.
Jay Edlington
I think you have a misconception between "free-energy" and "green-energy"
2 totally different things
perfect perpetual still is.due to bearings.
self running is common knowledge
One thing too try is turnings one motor 2 times as fast as the generator motor. Thank for the video Al
5 Minutes with a physics book could have saved you a lot of time.
Chris Cunningham he knew going in that it wouldn't work as did 90% of his viewers... that 10% that watch other scammers and "new science" and believe anything that says every scientist is part of a global conspiracy was the point in my opinion:) and to test stuff for urself is fun;)
dear sir . it possible to do, but you have to see this "different angle" if you have answers for "everything" there wont be "new thing"
boy_of_srilanka I hear that a lot... dreaming is a good thing, but when u base ur science off fantasy and disbelief ur taking a huge step backwards. facts r still facts;)
dear sir . i am agree with you, but if i don't evidence i never do this
You can always tell the ones who passed up theory and practical application of data to the physical universe! :D
Oh this will totally work, as long as there is are no losses. Unfortunately in the real world there are always losses. I think it is the Second law of Thermodynamics that pretty much rules out perpetual motion machines, isn't it? Now Be sure to tune in next week though when we put a windmill on the roof of a car to you know, power the car by the air rushing over the car while it is in motion.
Yep, if everyone just read the laws of thermodynamics there wouldn't be any more silly discussions about perpetual motion machines. As my old boss used to daw about this law, "there's no such thing as a free lunch"
Peter Nickelson
TANSTAAFL There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_ain't_no_such_thing_as_a_free_lunch
correct. even if the motors released zero heat energy to the surroundings, energy would be lost as entropy is generated. in order to have a perfectly efficient heat to work conversion in a heat engine, you would need something infinity hot and something at absolute zero. since that is impossible, perfect efficiency is impossible. the same concept applies for transferring electrical energy to work
lol
*****
If it doesn't have a propeller on the roof generating electricity for electric motors then I don't want to know about it either.
Did you try two alternators to power the generator?
Watched to 0:01 and I know the conclusion....no
+Timothy Haun lol come on you secretly believe in over unity even though it defies the law of physics :D
rugwcbinf
Hi from OZ,buddy as long as you are enjoying doing what you like doing keep it up and all the best.
"Electric Motor to Motor, can they self run?".....No!!!....Conversion and friction cause a loss, not a gain.
Which is exactly what he's being honest enough to try and show everybody. Unlike the scammers with hundreds of videos of idiotic motor to generator or stupid flywheel crap ideas, this guy is being honest and showing people that it's not possible.
We are not idiot for trying,thanks by demonstrating
It can create the impression or illusion of self running by using the caps as batteries ...
One unity is not possible but free energy is if you pull power from the earth the sun hero thermal and many other free sources
jolllyroger1 pulling power from wind, sun (solar), tides, etc is NOT what we are talking about here, unity +. I guess you think old steam engines are creating energy? LOL
Good demo, I'm sure there will be many people you just wont convince, no matter what you do to make it any more clearer than this, ie, energy out equals energy in minus any losses along the way, Physics 101.
Maxwell says no.
Nikola Tesla says yes.
Randolph says maybe
Look on Sirius document, Maxwell equations are wrong.
you take it too far.Joule said no before maxwell ! hahaha
@@midoumoh8880LMAO.... where does Tesla say that? Reference?
Physicists all over the world are no doubt breathing a sigh of relief.
Keep up the great ideas!! It is people who defy the norm and push the boundaries that this country is about. Don't let the corporation keep you in the box they create. Can't wait to see who breaks the laws of physics!
I agree 100% with you but even if we are both wrong and someone gets a motor/generator combination running perpetually, the instant you try to draw a few micoamps from it..................game over.
You're an idiot
Perhaps changing the drive ratio. A belt and pulleys drive system. A 2>1 ratio could give you the "driven" speed of the generator shaft at half the "drive" speed of the drive motor shaft. Now think about 10> 1 or 20>1 ratios, how much could that help? I like your idea about using capacitors, perhaps some type of array of capacitors. Set up in a phased array, loading and unloading to supplement the system. unfortunately, the problem always seems to come back to that old adage what's the answer to everything the problem is heat, it causes parasitic loss. Great delivery, very down to earth, and on a personal note. I have to say I like the way you keep your wires. no fancy clips for you, just twist them and go! AWESOME, I love the real world not a stage show. I have always had a interest in this concept, wondering if one could be built. Thanks for the great video, keep up the great work.
magnets can be done on a type of shaft with bearings without the aid of electrical start
Hi poole, yes magnets will unboubtedly be important energy source in the future. Just think how well they might work in outer space with no gravity, less friction. The navy has magnetic guns that are VERY powerful.
cant beat laws of thermo dynamics
Perpetual motion machine aren't possible...
the_real_matt yes they are you have to super cool the electrons to give them free flow so they do more work for less out put give you free energy so cool it lol 😆😆😈😨😨😨😨😱😲😲😵
I really hope your just joking around.
what is a water wheel?
Troll Universe what about a tidal genorator
Tidal generators draw energy out of the rising and falling of the waves, reducing their wave size in exchange for energy. Energy is never created or destroyed, merely converted
this guy must be a graduate of tri-angle tech
As long as you dont change the inside workings of a "normal" motor the regular motor is designed to auto destruct the dipole "battery" back emf, lenz law etc. etc. but if you use the back emf & structure the magnetic flux to flow with the current instead of opposing it then maybe just maybe you have a chance
First Law and 2nd Law both say no. it will work only in vacuum with no parasitic energy loss. As soon as you are in real world, there will be frictional and heat loss. Nice work on the demonstration.
Well if you only included some magic in the system, maybe a flux capacitor or two... then it would totally work.
nope theres a lot of resistance + it can't produce energy for one motor + that 2nd motor to produce energy
agreded
+Link Age havn't you watched back to the future kid?
that what did you tried self running forget about that you can't get more power because theres heat theres resistance a lot of stuff that will stop it from self running even if you use one stronger motor that won't work resistance will be biger if you do that theres no way that it can produce enough power for light and for moving motor on the left side that will run one on the right
thats what i want to say you all the time
Everybody shitting on this video is missing the point. Kudos to this guy for clearing up some of these myths.
This makes me laugh. I thought about this idea when I was 13. Crazy to see it being tested.
+Shawn E ...Yes...it's wonderful thought experiment as 13 year-old (who didn't pay attention to his 5th Grade science class). But it's just embarrassing to watch grown men seriously attempt this.
There is no such thing as a machine or device that creates the same or more energy than it uses....Period.
+Jc Knight I would call it 'fascinating'. No need to attack the author. If he has the time on his hands to bust a myth... why not? MythBusters do it all day. :)
+Shawn E ....There is a good reason to attack people like this. Many of them attempt
to dupe people by investing in their schemes. They are no better than charlatan preachers stealing little old lady's money by offering them
"salvation".
The problem is, he's not busting the myth. Not even close. Nor do many of the other thousands of people who post their "perpetual motion" machines on TH-cam.
Every single one has an external power source ADDING more energy than it's taking out. That's the opposite of "free energy". And MythBusters CONSTANTLY talk about the impossibility of perpetual motion machines.
There's a standing $10 Million dollar prize for anyone who can demonstrate a working perpetual motion device. No one has claimed it. Why do you think that is? These "inventors" just don't like Money?
+Jc Knight I was a very smart kid. 5th grade science is when the science teacher laughed at me when I presented this idea. 10th grade catholic school for smart kids around 1977, during the oil embargo times, the Father said the closest thing man made to 100% efficiency was a Canon pump. Back in those days while driving thru the country and big farms you would hear this thing go off like a canon, hence aptly named canon pump. It would build up water pressure to a super high level and then bang, shoot it down the pipes for miles. I see little info about it on the net now and have not heard one in decades. Technology must have surpassed it. However to create more than goes in is a joke
+Shawn E same
I tried this way back in my teens. The fly wheel idea with a battery pack (not capacitors) to help hold and control the "extra voltage" did work for a while but it does eventually stop. Even tried putting a gear box between a smaller "drive" motor and the generator motor. Same results. I even went as far as building my own generator to deliver more power than the motor I was using as a generator. Had some interesting generator designs......, but anyway, same results. Trying to achieve over unity might be able to be done. But it didn't happen for me. Next Batter may step up and take a swing!
This was going to be my post then I read your message and thought I'd put it here instead, lol.
I think we talking about the same thing, I'm interested to know why it didn't last and how long you were getting out of it.
This was my post;
Isn't the idea to use an alternator & electric motor? or 2 alternators (with one being reversed as a motor)?
Basically if you have a large and powerful alternator that's connected to some sort of Large battery Block or powercell etc... That could run your home and be kept charged by the alternator when needed.
Any reason why you couldn't just attach an electric motor (that uses the same powercell/battery block for power) to spin the alternator that keeps everything powered up & charged.
Why wouldn't that setup work? apart from some in efficiency issues that could surely be resolved with some clever thinking?
Surely someone has tried this and there is a major flaw I'm missing that means it can't work?
The first thing you will notice if you build your own "motor to same size motor" set up is that when no electricity is being demanded from the motor/generator, the drive motor will have no trouble turning it. But as you demand more juice from the generator the drive motor will be bogged down until the same energy the drive motor needs to turn equals the power output of the generator. The system then ceases to function. That's why I tried fly wheels and even gearing to lessen the torque on the drive motor while trying to maximize torque on the generator. Same thing happens. With multiple generators the negative effect on the drive motor gets worse per generator attached. The only thing I could do was lengthen the discharge time on a battery pack by "trickle charging" the pack as it was used to power the drive motor. I did that a very long time ago and my notes on it have long since been thrown out so I can't quote everything specifically. There may be some way to get this thing to work. Concentrate on this: each part of a system like this has a weakness that effects the efficiency of another (or next phase) part of the system. Finding parts that can compensate (ideally OVER compensate) it's weakness to the next part of the system is key to doing this. Research, build, test, find the flaws, repeat. I hope for the best of luck to you. We have to get something working sometime!
Thanks for the reply mate I appreciate it & yeah I agree we do too... Think the answer lie's with more natural resources like water. I always remember Nikola Tesla's quote on how waterfalls are the most resourceful & productive way of creating energy.
So If you have this or a running water flow on your property you're already in business, but I can't see why anyone couldn't set this up with a makeshift dam, or large water tank, that feeds down and through a turbine that ultimately powers your generator, then using some sort of ram pump system to feed the water back through making it self sustaining as long as you have enough water pressure.
Even having that other set up we talked about as a back up etc... That's probably what I'll be looking at doing, something like that I'm thinking.
Thanks for your help :)
LOL! I did that project about a water source running a generator that feeds water back to the source! Thinking alike here! What I did with my nephew was: 5 gallon water bottle (water source) running a 4 foot drop to a small motor (generator)ending in a spill pool. At first we had a small pump hooked to the generator but ran into the same problem as the motor-motor design. We decided just to "make it work", ran to Radio Shack for a few small solar panels (the small kit sized ones), then had the solar panels run several small pumps to feed the spill pool water back to the source. Worked fine though defeated the purpose. Just seeing results was exciting for my young nephew so he was pretty proud. Sometimes seeing something you build like this can give you future ideas. NEVER be afraid to try something even if you think you will fail. That failure may lead to new ideas that may work.
Electric Motor to Motor, can they self run?
No ... next video.
yes sir, make it according to your needs and it will serve it's purpose.
Did you try it with AC motor, alternator and a flywheel ?
This can be done. Loads of people have done it and it's not that difficult. I have managed to knock up a rough model. I might refine it in the future when I have more time. It's no big deal, there are loads of free energy machines out there. These types of machines are a little bit primitive now compared to the pure electronic generators which have no moving parts. The reason why this experiment was not successful, is because there is no potential difference in the design.Thats to say that everything is locked together, so there's no opportunity for it to freewheel and gather momentum. You also need some very simple electronics to make it work. The best ones are purpose built, so that all the coils,magnets,electronics etc, are all built into the flywheel, and they run on extremely low friction bearings. I made my (slap generator) as I called it, as school science project when I was 13 years old.I am now 58 years old. Believe me when I say, free energy machines have been discovered, built, and shelved. The governments of the world don't want us to have this simple technology. People have been threatened and even killed in order to keep it under wraps. They use bits of it occasionally for example, in some states of the US, all the emergency vehicles are powered by hydrogen. In certain parts of New Zealand they have ariels that absorb very usable electricity from the atmosphere, Tesla style, but they've had that since the seventies but there are many more examples. Peace to you.
Don't make fun my friend. What most people don't take into account, is that while many things have advanced over the years, science theory has not. Science has not moved with the times, and many of the old theories ARE WRONG. Scientists even know this but continue to try and make it fit into the modern things that they are working on. It's just sheer pride laziness and arrogance on their part. If I was struggling with a project for years and someone gave me all the answers on a plate, I'd be extremely grateful. I have previously offered to share the theory of my machine with someone on youtube, but I will only do this via email. I have posted things on youtube in the past and have had so many questions, that I couldn't cope with them and just don't have the time to answer them all.
TRUTHLORD I am interested in your discovery so far. please email me gonyibitham@gmail.com
gonojah ibitham. I am currently traveling,but as soon as I am back home and settled in a few days and have more time, I will drop you an email. It's good to hear from someone who's serious and interested.
Hi, I have also been working on a similar project but was only successful with low volts dc motors. Could you share your ideas with me please? My email address is ladikajola@gmail.com.
Thanks.
fascinating.
If you are putting power to both motors which one is the generator ??
You're doing it wrong. You need a flux capacitor.
No. Just a bottle of 'Sympathetic Magic".
A Flux capacitor and you have to get the rotations up to the equivalent of 77mph....... then you'll have free energy and can travel in time
This is how all the overunity videos should look if they were doing it as they say lol, KUDOS for showing people the reality of physics and why we don't all fly off the planet.
well, of course it doesn't work. you're using the wrong capacitors! it will self-run only with flux capacitors.
but that will be only a 1 to 1 power ratio. no over-unity. for over-unity you need naquadah magnets.
duh...
;))
No, he needed to use artron energy rather than electricity
faith is free ,and nothing to lose but pollution
You cannot break the laws of physics. They are not like mankinds laws, they are impossible to break unless under impossible conditions (I.E. quantum physics).
HEHEHE.... LAW IS MAKED FOR BRACK
+RAHUL GUPTA ...Only if you're a Democrat.
+gskaloyan You cannot break the laws, but you can get around them with the proper setup.
+gskaloyan emdrive just has ......
OK.
One electric motor turning two generators charging in parallel with batteries in series. Charge the battery at the same rate that it drains and the electric motor should run constantly. If a hose outputs 1 gallon per minute, and the bucket empties at 1 gal per minute, the fluid level in the bucker remains constant. : )
There's no reason to beat around the bush, self-running IS impossible because it violates the Law of Conservation of Energy, and the laws of Thermodynamics amongst others. The only way you could have a self-running system is if they are 100% efficient, which is impossible. There are always going to be internal and external losses: Friction, internal resistance, viscous damping, and much more. Even if the system is 99% efficient, there will be a 1% decrease in energy output vs input, meaning this system will not self-run.
So if you have a 100 W motor driving a 100 W generator, which is powering this motor, the only way they could self-run is that if this system is 100% efficient and the entire 100 W from the generator is sent to the motor. In reality, when the generator produces 100 W, the motor would probably see 80 W or below depending on how well constructed the motor and generator is and the next cycle, it would be 64 W and so on until 0.
It maybe possible to get really efficient motors/generators via superconductivity etc but even then, it won't be 100%.
it needs to be done with a 2 hp 6000 rpm dc motor with reduced speed by a gear ratio of 5:1,which will increase the torque 5 times to making a total of 7456 watts and reduce the speed 5 times slower to run a 10kW generator. Your draw to the motor will be 1491.4 watts and the voltage is 180 volts dc, which should be 8.29 amps, and, the generator output will have 220 volts AC with 7456 watts max load and a current capability of 33.9 amps maximum (I'd put a 30 amp breaker maximum, maybe even limit it at 25 amps to reduce wear on the motor. The generator will have to use a bridge rectifier with 30 amp alternator diodes (cheapest) , then, a buck converter to drop the rectifed voltage which will be nearly 300 volts DC back down to about 210 volts dc to loop back to the batteries running the prime mover (180 vdc motor) When connecting the buck converter, be sure to connect a light bulb across the positive and negative of the feed to the buck converter to get rid of additional voltage spikes created by the generator if it is not an induction style generator. Standard generators make too many spikes as it is too dirty so, when you have a dc motor operating at a very high rpm, this may also produce unwanted spikes that will destroy the buck converter which is sensitive to spikes. If you use an inverter, the same thing will need to be done, adding a light bulb. Check out Jesse McQueen's patent as it works and does so very well. The motor, inverter, generator, and buck converters as well as the necessary wires are all very expensive but worth it for free electricity. The motor is easily $2500-$4000 for a very good 6000 or 7000 rpm 180 vdc motor. This system works perfectly in a self loop mode. Good luck building it as parts are scarce and expensive!
have you never heard "laws are ment to be broken". hahahaha. or "never say never".
That law had being violated long ago, no longer a virgin , first prof is stochastic resonance over-unity gain in crystal latices , Ein + e↓ = Over-unity
There's way too many people currently suppressing the technologies at the moment by shielding the overunity element with the physics books that the current limitations in physics have made anybody creating an overunity look like madmen. I have been working with systems now for 10 years and have cleverly released many devices that show this overunity very clearly, however, science has come up with some sort of wording to shred even one ounce of possibility of my developments by telling everybody these devices have been long ago been debunked when they never have even existed before. I'm sure you've encountered the same problem where guys like Erik Krieg have complete nonsense to say about a perpetuum device like the man in Italy with his giant Ferrous wheel he created (A machine To Die For) . It obviously runs by itself due to the transfer of weight from the bottom to the top of the wheel, but, when there is any reasonable doubt, such as Erik stated it could be running from the wind, science puts this flaw in front of anybody and sets it aside from reason so nobody will again speak of it. It isn't fair as new technologies are being buffered from society for what? To continue to allow the use of fuel, and it is damn pathetic as we are in a race to find a technology to replace fuels and there have been several devices that work but never have been released to stop the chance to create and then sustain a fuel free society and it really sucks. If anybody, our government should stand by our inventors and protect their developments because they are all the work and needs of tomorrow. Without the private inventions out there provided by the world's smartest people, the continuation of our world will be impossible and we will all need to get our heads together in the same space to put together thoughts to overcome this ridiculous greed and jealousy that has now been damping our abilities to prevail, which has been happening now for hundreds of years.
Look into REX RESEARCH(dot) com no one spends $14,000 or more in things that do not work , hundred of patents are real working devices ...
I knew an auto mechanic years ago who actually believed that he could design an eight cylinder engine, four large cylinders to act as an air compressor into a storage tank to drive four smaller cylinders in a two cycle configuration using compressed air instead of expanding gases from burning fuel. The idea was to charge the on board air storage tank initially from a shop compressor and once the "engine" was put into motion, it would sustain itself into eternity on it's own regenerating compressed air supply. The only maintenance it would need was to keep the oil clean but because it didn't run as hot as an internal combustion engine, the oil would last considerably longer. That and replacing bearings, piston rings ect. as they wore out. He wouldn't listen when I tried to explain to him that the pressures that he could practically develop in this fashion would be much lower than normal combustion chamber pressures and could NOT sustain itself let alone that AND move an automobile too but this is how innovation happens. It comes from people who reach for the unattainable but settle for more than what's available.
LOL... I'm interested to know the depth of this guy's understanding between a motor and a generator.From what I am seeing it's an obvious fail.
I built one of these back in 1987. Mine worked.
Over-Unity = Under-Educated
What I like most about this video is you refer to motors, as motors, which they are, while every video talking about engines refers to them as motors. Duh my 440 motor or my Big Block Motor. Motors are electric and every car show on T.V. Refers to engines as MOTORS. Motoring?
Two asynchronous motor, sccording to Tesla, should be able to run with a capacitor in between the wires. Try out different connections of the wires, but you should give the inicial push.
omg , Tesla was a visionary, instead of pursuing radio he spent his whole life trying to transmit free energy through space. Marconi then picked up on the radio and made a fortune. Tesla died in poverty. his only true claim to fame was magnetic flux was named after him. I have great respect for Tesla, it's just when people misquote his ideas that you can create energy from from f all that really make people look and sound ridiculous.
you can never make 1 to 1 work (head to head) different size pulley's side by side will give you results.. example 2 to 1 drive pulley turning 2 rotations for every one given will give you excess power to run other things. this is the equivalent of a driveshaft in a car. the drive shaft rotates at 4 to 1, driveshaft turns 4 times to rotate a wheel once.. in high gear drive is 1 to 1 and overdrive is 1.5 over a 1 to 1 ratio so it has been proven.. its not simple as this video.. i still can't figure out why the government does not put windmills on the highways..ever break down and walk home? the trucks that drive by make wind that will knock you over...why waste the wind energy...everyone is just not looking in the right places for free energy
You cannot create energy out of nothing and you can't circulate energy in the form of electricity into induction, into kynetic energy, back into induction and then back into electricity indefinitely. No matter if there's more capacitors or no matter what the turn ratios are.
Wind turbans need to be huge to be efficient and by the way, that's not what this video is talking about when it says "free" energy. This video is showing that perpetual motion is impossible. Meaning that whatever energy you initially have will dissipate without any additional energy from outside the system. Wind turbines are not creating its own energy. It gets its energy from the wind.
WOW I see ignorance is still blissful in science.
I can't believe people are so motherfucking stupid that they think this can work. And just saying TESLA is not some magic word that turns ignorant bullshit stories into truth
It needs a loop of energy from one of the motor outputs looping back into the other to keep it running.
We are trying the same thing, with puting some strong Magnet. We'll activate the magnet with a strong spark going to a coil. We expect that the brief spark of energy will generate a strong trust to the magnet that will ad momentum.
This way we could create an over unit of energy that can be either reused immediately or stocked into a cynetic weel.
What we need is a periodic spark that will accelerate as the speed will increase.
will it work if you use gears?
Many thanks for making this video, it show the laws of physics, you cant get out more than you put in!
This is a wonderful example of how it cant work, anyone fighting this is off there nut, the only way this can possibly have a chance would be a vacuum with magnetic bearings at zero Kelvin using super conductors, but all that is going to take a small power station to make to correct environment to have the 10 watt motor and generator run.
Back to school for anyone arguing !!!
Motors are fun to play with. If you connect the two in series and load down one, the other will speed up and run faster. You can find ways get energy off the motors while they run. Wire a capacitor and a LED light across the motor connections in both directions and they will light up and the motor will run just as well. But, over unity is never possible.
What about adding some gears to make the generator spin faster? Would that even work?
Thank you for this video. First, I want to give you a thumb up for the humble way you express yourself. That is to me a very good sign of a serious presenter. Now physics. I have seen many videos about "greater than unity" (right words??) machines. I miss some really good explanations from the producers HOW they did. I have never seen any proper schematics presented either. Even videos where the actual demonstration was not a demonstration of a "perpetuum mobile"., but merely some electrical experiment, I saw. Even if I am a classic researcher (applied physics) I am open to some stuff that we cannot prove, but have been PROPERLY experimentally shown. However, the motor-generator thingy, I do not buy that. First law of thermodynamics. Just a little reasoning here: ASSUME that we can make more energy than we put in to the system. I said ASSUME! I also assume that we believe in Einstein's formula that E=mc^2. The old smart guy said that energy equals to mass. My conclusion: Then the motor-generator setup can make mass. Oops, what would happen to Universe? These thoughts have been produced just now. No deeper philosophy.
After reading some of the comments I also became convinced that this will work for sure, all you need is a 100 watts or less motor that can produce 1 hp or more. I swear that I'll make it work if someone can find such machine. Off to the junk yards of the world lads...
you didn't look the whole picture..why there's so many capacitor on that table?..and it might be connected for those motor, for knowledge...capacitor and inductor(motor) connected parallel can create flywheel effect(unlimited energy) but need to supply it by enough energy...please everyone contribute not to criticize or negative on this. Think there's so many individual wanting our life easier and study what ever aspect that may contribute in our society. Appreciate their doing!!!
A friend of mine had an electric motor on it that he had wired so that as it ran it would self charge the batteries, but i'm not sure what he did to modify it exactly. But that is a good experiment just to see if they would do the task! :)
Thanks for making this video.
Maybe this will help to stop the stupidity. My step brother thought he was gonna be smart and do this back in the 70'es. I understood back then why it wasn't gonna work
did you try a diffent gear ratio on the motors.
Bless you for trying to explain logic to stupid people. It almost certainly won't work but at least you're trying.
could this be used as some sort of flywheel maybe? it can store energy for a small amount of time like a flywheel
Dat conservation of energy doe.
Good Job for putting it out there ! We live and we learn :)
Great video sir!!!
The fun thing with such setup is that it is theoretically equally effetive as only use one motor and a flywheel. When motor is connected to generator and back to motor, there is no way to distinglish what is generator and what is motor. So we can probably get a slightly better performance if we just remove one of the enginges and we will not loose energy from unbalance and friction in the removed motor.
It all boils down to law of conservation of energy...
did you try 1 motor to turn 6 generator?
Finally🙏 can you add battery to continue charge and run.like loop
That as well as a lager motor and a couple of one way diodes. I thought of that too. Doesn't make since to remove the battery because the motors need a constant flow of current to work right?? Not sure I never took physics
The principle behind this is actually quite easy to understand:
Imagine if you didn't have any motors there's an equilibrium of energy that sum up to 0.
If you have any realistic engine there will be losses, and so the equilibrium of energy ends up being 0 but some of that energy isn't going to power to engine and is actually being loss by friction, heat, and other electrics losses.
Two motors of same efficiency will have double the losses as one motor, they should stop each other rather quickly once both are off the grid.
you can't do like a electronic turbine that makes this thing spool up without fuel, or in an electron point of view, batteries or any outer source of power
Where are your millions of dollars for your perpetual motion device award? LOL