The voice of the London Tube, Emma Clarke did some spoof announcements (Which she was fired over) which some considered offensive, but are funny ;) Enjoy
She's actually on the Central and Bakerloo lines, and some 'Mind the Gap' announcements.. Although they've dubbed in Sarah Parnell at some stations (Bank, White City etc) since the start of year
camjkerman She’s not on the S-stock trains, she use to be the voice of the D-Stock trains. The voice of the S-Stock trains is a woman called Sarah. Emma’s voice is on the old 1967 stock trains that use to run on the Victoria line, the voice on the old C-stock trains that use to run on the Circle line, the 1972 stock on the Bakerloo line and the 1992 stock on the Central line and some mind the gap announcements.☺️
No. Only for the District line D stock, Bakerloo and Central lines. The Circle line C stock (2009), Victoria Line 67 stock, Hammersmith and City and the District line C stock (2009) are announced by Sarah Parnell
It's called "bringing the company into disrepute" and pretty much all companies will take action against it. As it happens, she wasn't actually sacked, because she wasn't a TfL employee. She's a freelancer so takes work on from anyone who'll pay her (if she wishes to) and TfL decided they wouldn't offer her any more work in the future. That's their choice, and it's probably something she took into account before releasing the recordings on her website. She wasn't a teenager who did things for giggles and kicks without thinking about the possible consequences, after all. From her point of view she probably got more bookings (and thus earned more) because of the notoriety this brought her.
How can one be so arrogantly self assured, yet so wrong, in combination with the general pointlessness of your continued existence? Perhaps you could enlighten me?
No, despite the newspaper headlines which show up when you google her. She wasn't under contract to TfL at the time and wasn't in any sense a TfL employee, so she couldn't be fired. She simply wasn't offered any more work by TfL, and I doubt she missed the minimal pay she would have got from them.
@@ninjaninja9954 Depends what her contract was, I guess. It might have been a specific contract to produce X minutes of announcements for £Y, rather than X weeks of employment at £Y per hour. Whatever it was, I suspect the hourly rate worked out fairly high but for a short period which means overall she probably wasn't paid a huge amount. I'm only guesstimating, though, so I could well be wrong!
@@atraindriver no one pays contracts by how much work you do. They pay hourly or daily rate with contracts ranging from around 150 a day to over 1k. I don't think she was getting paid the minimum 150 q day if she really was a contractor
This is the best thing ever.
Ikr
It’s not the best thing ever. It’s rude!
#BringBackEmmaClarke
1:17 and 1:53 was the funniest :3
The M25 comment is so true! hahaha
Everybody make sure to send this to ur friends who love the London underground
Like me
I miss the D Stock on the District line.
Love it 😀
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's just great!
1:18
I GO PLACES I AM NOT A COUCH POTATO
hahaha XD
Are these Voiceover artists asked to speak their minds off or is it all scripted?
This was so sick
funny yes...to bad that they fired her XD
No wonder why she got fired.....
this made me laugh so hard! come on get a sense of humor people! i think she should meet up with the "sum ting wong wi tu lo" guy xD
Is this copyright free?
Ha ha love this
Just Imagine🤣🤣🤣
Can someone make a video of this on an actual train?
Given how standoffish londoners can be wouldn't surprise if that very act would get them arrested
To people who say the lines she is on, it is the Victoria and S-Stock lines.
camjkerman s
She's actually on the Central and Bakerloo lines, and some 'Mind the Gap' announcements.. Although they've dubbed in Sarah Parnell at some stations (Bank, White City etc) since the start of year
camjkerman She’s not on the S-stock trains, she use to be the voice of the D-Stock trains. The voice of the S-Stock trains is a woman called Sarah. Emma’s voice is on the old 1967 stock trains that use to run on the Victoria line, the voice on the old C-stock trains that use to run on the Circle line, the 1972 stock on the Bakerloo line and the 1992 stock on the Central line and some mind the gap announcements.☺️
No. Only for the District line D stock, Bakerloo and Central lines. The Circle line C stock (2009), Victoria Line 67 stock, Hammersmith and City and the District line C stock (2009) are announced by Sarah Parnell
You couldn’t have been more wrong. Vic and S stock is Sarah Parnell, Emma is Bakerloo and Central lines.
Lol
Look around you’re in London
Noice
So rude XD
As a person that did my dissertation of the algorithms and mathematics of Sudoku i can safely say Emma is misinformed about sudoku
I don't know what part is funny 😂😂
But 0:34 Were the funniest
What does she mean by the 'tramps provided?'
Dunno what you call tramps in Oz, but the Yanks call them panhandlers. Homeless beggars, basically.
😂😂😂
lol kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
lol
🤣😭😂
That was offensive!
1:33
2:05
Much better than Sarah Parnell
ikr
Sarah parnell sounds great on the C stock though. Not robotic
@@Great_WesternTVFan Agreed
Sarah Parnell doesn't sound good on the Central line, nothing wrong on the subsurface and Victoria lines
She didn't deserve it, why should any of this concern her job role?
It's called "bringing the company into disrepute" and pretty much all companies will take action against it.
As it happens, she wasn't actually sacked, because she wasn't a TfL employee. She's a freelancer so takes work on from anyone who'll pay her (if she wishes to) and TfL decided they wouldn't offer her any more work in the future. That's their choice, and it's probably something she took into account before releasing the recordings on her website. She wasn't a teenager who did things for giggles and kicks without thinking about the possible consequences, after all.
From her point of view she probably got more bookings (and thus earned more) because of the notoriety this brought her.
She wasn't sacked over it, you've pulled that out of your arse. How do you "sack" voice recordings?
Her contract wasn't renewed?
How can one be so arrogantly self assured, yet so wrong, in combination with the general pointlessness of your continued existence? Perhaps you could enlighten me?
she is a real person who is no longer making new announcements for them
0:34 or at all 😏
Worth losing your job over?
was she actually fired??
Yes
No, despite the newspaper headlines which show up when you google her. She wasn't under contract to TfL at the time and wasn't in any sense a TfL employee, so she couldn't be fired. She simply wasn't offered any more work by TfL, and I doubt she missed the minimal pay she would have got from them.
@@atraindriver then she was a contractor and contractors get paid a lot
@@ninjaninja9954 Depends what her contract was, I guess. It might have been a specific contract to produce X minutes of announcements for £Y, rather than X weeks of employment at £Y per hour.
Whatever it was, I suspect the hourly rate worked out fairly high but for a short period which means overall she probably wasn't paid a huge amount. I'm only guesstimating, though, so I could well be wrong!
@@atraindriver no one pays contracts by how much work you do. They pay hourly or daily rate with contracts ranging from around 150 a day to over 1k. I don't think she was getting paid the minimum 150 q day if she really was a contractor
Lol