I always want to bring my Leica with me when I go out, but then I tell myself that it's too expensive to bring out, and I begrudgingly bring my OM-1. And then when I get the film back from both cameras, I consistently like the Olympus images more. It's just so easy and so well designed, and the viewfinder is so big and bright that I just always take better photos with it.
If I had a Leica, I’d probably feel guilty about NOT bringing it out, lol. But, yes, I get your point. The OM cameras completely bucked traditional design, and for what they are and how they operate, there are really few competitors. I guess you could make an argument for the Pentax MX or Minolta XD for size, but I think the OMs stand alone for overall design.
I agree. Although my M6 get's regular use, I might like my OM-*'s more at times. I just wish the film wind lever didn't feel like it was grinding sand comparatively to the M6.
Hi from Germany! 1st of all: very nice shots! I bought my OM1 1979 when I was 20 with 50mm/f1.8 and it was my very first SLR - I was more than happy&proud. And it is still in use, me now 65, the OM1 45 years in use - mostly now 50mm/f1.4 (upgraded the lens). The OM1 teaches you to slow down, to focus on taking pic, no hurry, no AF no information in the viewfinder - just you, your eye, the ASA, the roll in the cam, the time and the relaxed shooting. Love my OM1. Thx for sharing!
Greetings! Thanks for checking out the channel. The OM-1 can’t be denied as a fine camera. The idea of such an uncluttered viewfinder has grown on me since posting this. I don’t think I’ve ever used another camera as easy to focus as an OM body - even with my aging eyes. And I’m not surprised that yours has been going strong for 45 years. Such an elegant machine! Cheers!
I've had my trusty OM-1 for over a decade now and it has never let me down. I've taken some of my favourite pictures with it, even though I mostly shoot 120 these days, I still get the urge to use my OM-1 as it's just so enjoyable and easy to use.
Thanks for tuning in! Yes, I think Olympus succeeded in delivering a camera that was fun to use while not being so big it became a hindrance to shooting.
A few years ago (ahem) I bought an OM system from an old friend. He was downsizing and wanted to sell his kit as a package deal. I am a vintage lens fan (hoarder), so I made him and offer and he took it. What I got was an OM-1 MD and an OM-2D plus a handful of mostly Zuiko lenses. I played with the lenses adapted to my NEX-5N (that long ago) and there are some keepers in the lot. I kept them all. Back when I got started in photography, there were a lot of dedicated OM system professionals. I know they were attracted to the size and weight of the system. Once they learned the system, they were brand ambassadors for the most part. Two things occurred to me watching you work the camera. First is that an angle finder would be a huge addition to the kit for your style of shooting. Second is working out a system for knowing where you were regarding aperture and shutter speed without having to look. For the latter, counting clicks would do it. I think the same for the former. That's how I would approach it. Olympus also made a 40mm f/2 lens that is very nice. I'm a fan of that focal length over the nifty-fifty and have the 40mm Zuiko in my collection. (I have a 40mm f/1.8 Hexanon in my collection as well and it's a great lens!) You didn't mention your processing of the film, so I'd guess you used D-76 for it. I sure used a lot of D-76 and Microdol-X in the day. I might have to stock up and find my cans so I can process some film. Thanks for the video. It's good stuff.
Nice to hear from a fellow vintage gear “fan”. I have a friend who spent most of his early photojournalism career with these OM cameras. And loved them. So my very limited use of this camera doesn’t really add up to a real working experience. I think it’s design is unique, but it does require a little more general exposure knowledge from the user than some of its competitors - especially when you start to count clicks to divine your shutter speeds and f/stops. I actually took this camera on a week-long summer trip several years ago. And by the end of the week, I was pretty comfortable and confident with counting the clicks to determine my settings. So I think you’re correct on that. I probably would make good use out of an angle finder, lol! It would certainly be better for my knees and back. One of these days I’ll get down there and not be able to get back up. And it’ll be filmed for all to see :-) I’m glad to hear your praise of the 40 f/2 - and especially the Hexanon 40 1.8 - as I do have one of those in my Konica kit. I’ve used it very little so far, but I’ll be getting an episode ready on the AutoReflex T series cameras very soon. As for the processing - you are right on the money: D-76 1:1 is my go to. Although recently I’ve begun to explore others just to expand my experience. Not afraid of learning new tricks! Cheers!
My Dad bought one back in 1980. He gave me his old camera, a Zenit EM on the same day. It got me into photography, and I've enjoyed the hobby ever since. I was 13 years old at the time.
What a great age to discover photography! Looks like we’re about the same age, then. It took me a few more years before I decided to get serious about it. I was out of high school before I got a “real” camera. But I still look back fondly on that cheapo 110 camera I got from K-mart when I was about 10 yrs old. It was very empowering to me that I could choose the subject - what mattered and what didn’t. Ah, the memories….
I've had both an OM-1 and an OM-1 MD camera since the early 70s and I still use them on a regular basis. Also I have an OM-10 that I had bought new for my wife and the light meter was really inconsistent so she rarely used it. Recently I decided to give it a try after it had been in a box for about thirty years. When I inspected the camera I discovered a piece of debris inside of the manual adapter hole. Now I have a nearly new forty year camera that works perfectly!
I like how that story ended up! Something “new” to shoot with! I think the OM-10 is a great camera, too - especially with the manual adapter. I was gifted one several years ago and was told it probably didn’t work. But it did! And I might like it just a little bit better than the OM-1.
I picked up an Olympus OM1 several years ago while stationed in RI and didn't use it much until I retired. I love this camera! I do not mind taking my eye off the viewfinder and checking Fstop and shutter speed because I usually don't film anything moving. And after many uses, counting the clicks seems to be very accurate for me.I do love the size and weight of this camera. Great video and information.
Counting clicks and learning where the grips are on the shutter ring to determine your speed seems to be the the solution to the dilemma. Lots of people have echoed that technique works. I’m sure my experience would change the more familiar with the camera I become, and that would eventually be a non-issue. You certainly can’t beat the size of the camera. And that viewfinder…..just wow.
The best thing about this camera is that one does not need to worry about the batteries failing as the camera is entirely mechanical. I have an OM1n and I personally can't fault it. Back when I first started using one in 1990-ish it was the lenses that had me sticking with Olympus. I "upgraded" to an OM2sp which I preferred as it has spot metering but while to this day it is my favourite OM system camera it is flawed in that the electronics are faulty and cause the battery to drain too quickly- I was literally replacing batteries on an almost weekly basis but I digress. A couple of weeks ago I took a roll of out-dated XP2 with the OM1n mainly to test it as I'd just had it repaired (the film advance mech was faulty) and I really loved how the photos came out. The sharps of the photos was due to the lovely Zuiko 50mm f1.8 no doubt but also, after so many years of film photography, getting the exposure right has become almost instinctive, and having a very large and bright viewfinder makes it fairly easy (for me at least :) Yes, the meter helps but I use it more as a guide than anything else. I enjoyed your vid, thank you.
You’re absolutely right - having a manually controlled shutter is a huge benefit. I probably should have stressed that a bit more in the video. And that’s interesting to note about the OM-2sp and battery drain. I’ll definitely keep that in mind as I’m looking around. I have an OM-2n that was gifted to me but haven’t shot with it yet. I wonder if it will have the same issue?
@@vintagecameradigest Oh, the OM2n is near perfect, basically and OM1 but with an electronic shutter and an aperture priority auto mode. In fact, the only noticeable differences are the shutter sounds a bit different, a little quieter perhaps and, in auto mode, a little shutter speed scale moves into the viewfinder to tell you what shutter speed the camera has chosen. It does have an off switch but it is never off. It will take photos even when turned off though I'm not sure if it reverts to auto or manual mode but in my experience the photos are often well exposed so I assume auto. The batteries are good for six months to even a year. Again, in my experience. The metering is surprisingly accurate in the OM2n and SP particularly for long exposures in auto- up to ten minutes I believe. That' one thing Olympus really nailed with the OM2 and OM4 variants. That and the excellent Zuiko lenses.
My parents bought me one of these in 1977 when i was going into the Peace Corps. I took it all over the Philippines for my job and then used it for years after. Used on board outrigger boats, in rice paddies, and on remote islands. I loved this camera and only gave it away when the daughter of a friend of mine was taking a photography course and she loved it as much as i did. Thinking about getting another
Very kind of you to pass that camera on to the next generation. I hope she got a lot of good use from it. It really is a nice camera. I think you’d love to have one again. Like a visit from an old, dear friend!
My first serious camera and in many ways still my favorite manual match-needle camera, but hey! I'm a minimalist person. At the time, having optical info about aperture in the finder was impossible in the OM1, with the aperture ring in the front of the lens at various distances from the prism depending on the lens used. With this clarified we now turn to the shutter speed: with the handles of the ring in the horizontal, level, we instantly know that the speed is 1/60, a common speed for static subjects and also the sync speed for flash. Our baseline. With that in our head, we can feel what shutter we are using if we count the clicks to the right or left, and it's easy, with practice, to know it. Plus, each click in the shutter ring is mirrored in the aperture ring, so if we turn both rings the same amount in the same direction we keep the same exposure. Or control bracketing With our left hand doing all the active work, focusing etc... our right hand is only used to shoot and advance, making still for me the best handling 35mm camera of all time. All this view info was later introduced in later models in the range, particularly the OM-2, electronic and automatic aperture priority, with aperture and shutter in the finder, with auto exposure reaching way over 120 seconds, and auto cordless multiple flash metering trough the lens, the OM-2 was a technological breakthrough! Also the top of the line and end of an era OM-4 TI. I'm still a fan of the command layout of these cameras, logical and intuitive in my view: one hand for exposure, the other for shooting. Although I think the on-off switch could be better placed, around the shutter release, with a lock, like in the Nikons. Perhaps my only critic in terms of design and handling.
You are right. The more familiar you are with the camera, the easier it is to know it by feel. And I certainly appreciate the fact that both shutter speed and aperture are controlled with one hand. That benefit wasn’t immediately clear to me, but at some point it dawned on me just how useful that is. The OM’s are a unique design among the rest of the field. And I’m glad they stuck to it. They knew they had a good thing going.
Fifty years ago I was given a new early OM-1 for my 21st birthday. It was a lovely thing. I've had many Olympus SLRs since plus a lot of their lenses. Then life made me sell everything and when I started photography again I went the Nikon way but realised I should not have strayed. So I am awaiting delivery of a Pen E-5 with kit lenses from a dealer in Japan. It will be my first foray into 4:3rds and I'm eagerly awaiting delivery. I shall sell my Nikon stuff.
I think the entire Olympus lineage is unique. Unique in design and vision. And still a pleasure to use to this day. Now, I like my Nikon gear for other reasons, but Olympus (at least until the 90s) was a terrific option for non-AF users. Enjoy that Pen E-5! And thanks for watching!
I still have my OM-1 from 1977. It is still fun to use. It was my first 35mm camera so I don’t see the “quirks”, I just used them as they are. Thanks for the great post. You have re-inspired me to get out and do some shooting with it again. 26:06 19-Feb-2024
Ive used many 35mm cameras including Leicas, Pentax, Canon, Nikon and more. None preferred in my hand more than my OM1. It has never missed an exposure, no matter how bright the sky, how dark the background. Even with off the shelf batteries the light meter is dead accurate. People claim otherwise but ive had perfect luck with off the shelf batteries. Zuiko Glass is incredibly sharp, and beyond normal consumer grade. Truly a wonder of a gem.
I usually go for the modern batteries, as well. Never had any major exposure errors. I do know I need to shoot this camera more often. It's a nice one.
which batteries do you get ? 1,5V px625 ? I saw people saying that the difference between the 1,3 mercury batteries and 1,5V can alter the light meter...
Loved your video. I began shooting with the OM4 in 1986 and loved the experience. Still have it with many Olympus Zuiko lenses. Started using Olympus digital cameras in 2013 and added Sony FF cameras and glass in 2018. Have kept all of my Olympus gear as I love the size, feel of cameras and quality of lenses. I do use Olympus Zuiko glass on my Sony FF cameras periodically. Recently studied the work of Jane Brown an English photographer who shot with the OM 1 for decades, her work led me to look for the OM 1 today. Before buying I explored You Tube and found your video. I will most certainly buy one now. Thank you. BTW my most treasured Olympus Zuiko lens is a 55 mm f1.2.
The OM-1 is a very popular camera these days. And the ease of adapting the Zuiko lenses to other mounts makes the system that much more flexible. I’ve never even held one of the 55 1.2s - must be an amazing lens!
First off great video. I shoot with both OM-1 and OM-2 and at first I struggled with same user application as you did, however the more I used it the better the muscle memory and I could now adjust both shutter and aperture without removing the camera from my face.
Many thanks! Yes, I do realize that my limited use of the camera hardly counts as any real experience. And what you say about muscle memory sounds totally achievable. I can see how you’d eventually get a feel for how the position of the those two knurled grips on the shutter ring relate to a specific speed. Interestingly, this would be impossible on a traditional shutter dial - since it’s just a round dial. In any case, you’ve gotta give props to Olympus for a refreshing take on SLR design. Thanks for tuning in!
My parents bought me my first SLR for Christmas when I was 14, It was the Minolta SRT101. My 2nd camera was the OM-1 that I purchased from a classmate in photography school in 1979. I still have it today and love it just as much as when I first purchased it.
The OM-1 was my first SLR back in the 1980's when I was a teenager. My father had an OM-2 at the time. This allowed us to share lenses. I still have my OM-1 in storage somewhere. And I am still using Olympus OM Zuiko lenses on Canon EOS-M and EOS-R bodies and a Red Komodo. The Olympus lenses are still remarkable.
@ 18:06 the item is a mechanical speed governor for a steam engine (Centrifugal Governor). The metal balls swing in a circle as the machine runs and it governs how much steam is allowed into the valving controlling the speed.
as someone who learned photography on a OM-1, I personally adore it, and its weird shutter dial. the OM-2 is a touch easier with its Aperture priority feature, but I usually just use it to get a quick reading, and then hop to manual control to tune it in.
It is a nice camera. I have an old photojournalist friend who used OM cameras for the most of his film-era career. He swears by them. I’m sure if I stuck with the camera for a while, I’d develop a better appreciation for the design. And since I recently acquired an OM-2n, I’m anxious to revisit the OM system. Soon!
I’ll try to make that part of the shoot. Most all my shooting sessions have been in the daylight, and I really haven’t put some of these longer shutter speeds and auto features to use.
It’s truly a fine camera once you get used to its quirks. And yours has the added benefit of holding sentimental value and provenance - which is probably the best reason of all. Every camera I own has a backstory. Unfortunately, I’ll never know what they are for the most part.
I bought the OM-1 late 70’s. Still have it but eventually the OM 4t became my workhorse. Yes the left hand controls focus, shutter speed and the aperture which is brilliant. As for having to look down for info on the speed and stops, no problem at all, once you learn reciprocity (the law of) zero the camera to where you want it and going up or down matters not if you know reciprocity. Its easy when you become the CPU. 😊
Yes, I’ve heard from many viewers who are long-time OM-1 users that the design eventually becomes a non-issue. And it does make sense that would be the case. A fine camera, no doubt.
Either you have the know-how or you are a natural born video maker. Anyway, thank you for the pleasure of watching these 26:11 minutes in another video that entertains, informs, and inspires a lot. Every time I see one, I immediately feel a need to pick up a camera and go shoot. In December 1979, when I bought the nostalgic Modern Photography magazine, before reading the articles, I delighted myself with the ads one by one in all their detail and, on that day, among Minolta XD11, XD5 or XG9, the whole new Canon A-series range, in a beautiful two-page ad, and several other camera brands, on that very day I set the goal to buy a Olympus OM1 or OM2, as soon as I earn my own money. They looked astonishing with their beautiful top pyramid, that should never be spoiled with a hot shoe :) A few years later, on my first job, I finally got a used OM2n, which I still have and shoot often. Although cameras without electronics are very much appreciated, I was a early adopter of everything computer-related, so at the time I didn’t hesitate on the OM2n over the OM1 also for the advantage that, when in automatic mode, which is a aperture priority, it shows a nice speed scale on the viewfinder's left side, with a needle pointing to the photometer chosen speed, much more useful than the manual mode information. In addition to your aforementioned “thinking out loud”, you have another not common feature, comparing to other videos posted, that also contributes a lot to the richness of your work, which is you take several photos of the same theme, with the same framing but several diferent exposures or, just varying the framing, or both. Nowadays, with digital for “free” and the analogue climbing costs, many photographers have put the brakes on their shots, making each 35mm roll give 37 or 38 different images, if possible. Now, although everyone understands it perfectly, the truth is that it’s not the best way to do it, so I appreciate a lot to watch you working the “proper” way that photography deserves. Some time ago I read Mastherson’s The Leica Way book, published by Focal Press, and I found it curious the change in context from that era, 1953, to the one we have in 2023 because, what we currently think about analogue photography, which is to use and spend with great moderation, while with digital, the word is to shoot indiscriminately, in that book the writer explained and encouraged readers to make several shots, such as needed to get sure of a correct exposure, calling it the way to use advantages of the “new” 35mm, the size and number of photos the reader can get from a single roll, compared to the large formats cameras. Well, making a long story short, I hope the new video is already being cooked. Cheers
Thank you, thank you, and thank you. The next episode is currently simmering nicely. Although, earlier today I was out with a Ricohmatic 225 TLR (making amazing photos, mind you 😁) and realized that the film advance wasn’t working correctly. So your comment adds a bit of cheer to a frustrating afternoon. And I do thank you. It’s funny mentioning those old ads - I loved them. I even have a section on my website dedicated to just that because I knew I wasn’t the only one who enjoyed them. I’ve got about 1200 on there from the 1930s to the 1990s. Check them out when you have an afternoon to kill. Those are still where I get most of the inspiration to review certain cameras. But now we have the benefit of hindsight, so it’s interesting to compare the claims against the actual user experience. I was gifted an OM-2n a couple of years ago and do enjoy that over the OM-1. The info available - even if it’s only in auto mode - makes it much more usable to me. When I first got it, though, I was super excited that it had the shutter speeds in the finder - only to find they disappeared in manual mode. It seemed to me that the mechanism for moving the transparent overlay OUT of the viewfinder would be much more difficult than leaving it there in the finder, to be used for metering in manual. But I suppose it wasn’t since Olympus didn’t do it. Although, they did improve the finder for the OM-3 and OM-4. Also glad you enjoy my shooting method. I could easily take an entire roll on the same subject - hopefully to distill the best image out of it. But that would be pretty boring, I think, lol. But maybe not. Who knows how this channel will evolve? Always keeping options open. But that’s interesting about the Leica book. I do suppose that when 35mm was relatively new it was sort of freeing - especially when compared to 120 or larger. I do find myself “editing on the fly” sometimes when shooting bigger formats - knowing that I only have so many shots. So I really enjoy having a a bag full of 35mm when the camera calls for it! Again, many thanks for the kind words! Hopefully you’ll enjoy the next episode! All the best!
Bought my first OM-1 when they came out while in college shooting for my college yearbook and newspaper. Those two bodies carried me through into my newspaper photographer days. Eventually I moved on to Nikon since that was what the rest of the staff shooters had and we could share lenses. But I always loved that small simple body. I like a smaller body still. I still have my two bodies and three lenses and all are in good working condition. Thanks for the inspiration. I’ll go load them up.
I think the compactness of the system is the biggest selling point. Super easy to carry around. And of course the lenses are great. I’ve got my eye on an OM-4 I hope to try out soon. Will be fun to compare these two!
Very enjoyable, I wish I could walk that trail. Your photos were gorgeous too. Last video I watched was with that medium format monster! Thanks. Yes I'll be considering the OM-1 or as you noted, an MX.
Few years ago my daughter bought me an Olympus OM1n as a replacement for an (otherwise excellent) OM2sp that my dad gave me back in the day (which begun to fail), and I'm happy with it like a pig in the mud. I'm a casual film shooter, so I don't need anything but a bare bone camera, and I'm not even bothered by a battery since I mostly use external light meters with my film cameras. BTW, OM1n was allegedly produced until 1987.
Thanks for that info. I hadn’t researched how long that line was produced. So, looks like the production run on these fine cameras went all the way up to the new AF designed cameras. Which I think turned out to be a terrible way to honor the legacy of the OMs. Maybe Olympus thought that AF wasn’t something that would appeal to pros. And when it turned out that it did, they had little to offer. Still, the manual focus line of the OMs - any of them really - were excellent photo tools with a superb form factor.
@@vintagecameradigest Yes, OM 707 AF from 1986. was a pure disaster. They changed the mount course the shutter speed ring was in the way of the micro motor for the autofocus. Everybody wanted to jump that Minolta AF wagon. Even worst, had they waited a few more years they could implement Canon's way of autofocus via electronic contacts and AF motor in the lens to bypass that speed ring what could make all old lenses compatible...
For real! I bought one of the 707s last year, mostly out of curiosity, but also to compare to the other first-generation AF offerings from all the other manufacturers. I was completely surprised. And the lenses didn’t offer a manual focus ring! Hard to believe it was from the same company that produced such great OM bodies.
@@vintagecameradigest well,an CEO in any given company has a final say. And if you wanna know how things had gone at Olympus, just watch "Olympus has fallen" here on tube. Not the movie, but the documentary...
I took a photography class soon after I bought my first 35mm camera. A young guy, ( I was 23 and he was in his teens ), in that class was shooting an OM-1 with what I thought was great results! That was the only time I can remember ever seeing one of these cameras. If I get the chance I'll add one to my small group. When you do a review, I always feel like I really got in depth info... pro and con. Thank you!!
I appreciate that. I try to be balanced in my assessments and not just a fanboy of every camera. Although I am, sorta, lol. The OMs and their lenses are compact and, like I mentioned, the viewfinder can’t be beat. Thanks for watching!
I’ve owned several OM-1n’s. I should have kept the first one I owned bc the meter was accurate. But I’m gonna recommend this to people: look for a nice OM-2n. It is an aperture priority camera with sophisticated metering… AND… switch it to manual and you have a virtual OM-1. You have your cake and eat it, too, lol
Nice little camera, i have the original OM1 and the OM1n. The lenses are small and tack sharp. I think the closest competitor is the Pentax MX. Thanks for sharing.
You’re correct. Olympus absolutely inspired the Pentax MX and ME (which I think holds the record for being smallest). And Minolta went small, too, after that with the XD series. But these OM models are a real joy to use. You can NOT beat the viewfinder!
I had the OM-10 in the 80:s, and last year I bought the OM-1. As I normally shoot digital, I also lacked info like you. But it's a different thing to shoot analog. You have to slow down, because if film costs. And that makes me not concerned about the lack of time or speed in the viewfinder. I makes it a ritual to shoot analogue, and then I like lacking info all the time. I also shoot with the Olympus Flex, and that camera is completely without metering. I use my digital om-d camera as light meter when I start, but then I go completely by feeling. It works. It makes shooting meditation. I like that out of control - into the feeling mode. Otherwise, I should only shoot digital.
Yes, there’s something about the OM cameras that put you in a different head-space. I’ve sort of mellowed on my stance regarding the viewfinder. I’m always blown away by the size and brightness and it helps me put up with a few quirks of the camera. But I like how you equate it to meditation. That’s quite on point.
Thank you! I really do love the size and viewfinder of the OMs. I have an OM2n that I need to get out and shoot. From what I’ve seen from playing around with it, I think it will be my favorite, too. Thanks for watching!
Excellent review, thank you very much. I've already seen a few of your videos and besides giving very good information about cameras, I think your photography is very good despite the forced nature of having to make a roll of a subject chosen for the occasion and being able to show the virtues of the camera, lens and film chosen. Speaking of films, I think the Tmax 100 or 400 would work very well for textures, replacing the Tx, which is very good for general photography but perhaps not so good for taking advantage of textures and details, just an opinion.
Many thanks! Yes, it does feel a bit forced sometimes, but it’s a good challenge for me to continue to develop my creative vision. TMax 400 was my favorite 400 for many years. I still do like it. I sort of bounce back and forth between it and Tri-X and HP5.
Ok, I am a die hard fan of the small body, all mechanical 35mm SLR’s. So much so, I own more than one of each one of the following..The Pentax MX, the Nikon FM, and of course the Olympus OM-1 (in both the 1 and the 1N versions) as well as a Nikon FM2, but I’m not including it in my comparison of the other three. While all do have their pros and cons, at the end of the day my favorite is the OM-1. I too, hated the shutter speed and aperture adjustment locations at first. But after shooting a few rolls I found myself never having to take my eye away from the viewfinder. I just got use to the position of the Shutter speed dial, and could easily count where the f/stop was. I love the viewfinder and I really love the lenses. I have a high serial number 50mm f/1.4 lens (above the 1,100,000) that is in my opinion the best of the 50 1.4 lenses. While I do love the Nikon FM, and I enjoy the Pentax for what it is, the OM-1 just feels right to me. Great video.
Thanks for watching! At one point I had all these (but just one of each, lol), but eventually parted with the MX. It just didn’t excite me to use. I’ll definitely hold on to the OM-1 and FM, though. I can see how you could eventually get used to knowing what speed you were using based on the location of the ring. Others have mentioned that, too. So, definitely not a dealbreaker at all. I just need to give it a bit more time to get used to.
Thanks for watching! At one point I had all these (but just one of each, lol), but eventually parted with the MX. It just didn’t excite me to use. I’ll definitely hold on to the OM-1 and FM, though. I can see how you could eventually get used to knowing what speed you were using based on the location of the ring. Others have mentioned that, too. So, definitely not a dealbreaker at all. I just need to give it a bit more time to get used to.
I tend to shoot the OM-1n as a shutter priority camera. I’ll set the shutter speed based on the lens I’m using and the subject matter and then I’ll adjust the aperture to get the exposure I want. If I do need to change the shutter speed, I remember the base shutter speed I had it set at and adjust off that without taking the camera away from my eye. The one thing I do have a tendency to forget though is which way to adjust the shutter speed dial. 🥴
That method does make sense. And several of the commenters who shoot with these cameras regularly have a similar way of doing it. I’m sure if I used the camera on a more regular basis, I’d also develop a workable method. It’s definitely a camera that requires a bit of learning - maybe an “acquired taste”? And I think that if you experience the viewfinder, you’ll be more apt to follow through on it.
@@vintagecameradigest Right, the OM viewfinder is a thing of beauty. Makes manually focusing so much easier for these aging eyes. My OM-2n and OM-4T also have the same big and bright viewfinder.
I have owned my OM1n since 1978 and still works fine. This version can use a drive too although no idea what the n stands for. I have a 24mm lens attached and some Tamron lenses to use with it. The only camera I kept from new and won’t part with it. Agree the lack of info in viewfinder is a pain but not a deal breaker. No true replacement battery is the biggest disappointment as don’t like having present arrangement, these batteries, originally made for hearing aids leak like hell and once activated continue to drain even when not in use. I use a hand exposure meter instead. Thanks for your review.
Thanks for tuning in! I think the “n” just stands for “new” version of that classic. I think if I were to use the camera enough, I’d get a feel for the controls without actually having to look at them - especially the shutter speeds. It’s definitely a nice camera!
I’d love to see the reaction of a young photography enthusiast who grew up with digital cams the first time they look through a film viewfinder! The info in the vf is great (on my modern em1 mk3) but man I miss the big beautiful vf on my old film slr.
To know where you’re at in terms of shutter speed grab the ring and remember that when the finger bits tilt slightly to the left you’re at 1/60. It is that simple
Yes, that seems to be the general consensus of OM users. After enough use you get a feel for where the shutter is set from the position of the grips. Makes total sense.
MLU was pretty common on cameras in the mid-late 60s and early 70s. It may have had more to do with ability to mount super-wide angle lenses than control vibration - although that was a nice secondary feature. Some of those old super wides would sit so far back in the mirror box that the mirror wouldn’t clear them as it flipped up. So having MLU was almost necessary. Bronica got around that issue with their S-series cameras by having the mirror drop down and slide under the rear elements of its lenses. Very unique solution.
The mirror lockup was for macro and microscope photography. The OM system at the time had a massive selection of pro level equipment, such as Bellows, adaptors for microscopes, macro lenses etc. So the mirror lockup was to reduce vibration for the extreme magnifications.
The M name fiasco was a hint on where Maitani-san took great inspiration from: the Leica M series (but he owned a Leica III though). From the rewind lever to the placement of the aperture control (all rangefinder lenses have this anyway) to the footprint and small size of the camera (and lenses and accessories) itself, the Olympus OM is parallel to the Leica M, so much that I call it the "true" 'Leica' or Leica-style SLR. For note: the "M" in this camera comes from Maitani, while the "M" in Leica stands for the German word for rangefinder, "Messsucher" (literally meaning 'measuring finder').
And oh, I own an OM-1MD an OM-2SP (only bought because the seller wouldn't part it with the lens, which I was really after for). My current kit includes a 50/1.4 (came with OM-1), a 100/2.8, and a 28/2.8 (came with the OM-2SP). Out of all my cameras systems called (Leica M, Leica LTM, Nikon F, Kiev/Contax, and a couple of point and shoots), this one is the most used and my go-to for all kinds of shooting. Now, if only I can have hands on that 50/3.5 macro, I'd be satisfied.
The fascination with the Leica makes perfect sense. And I can see the parallels. What I did not know about these old Olympus bodies is how much people absolutely love them. And it’s no guess as to why.
I was looking forward to doing an episode on an OM-2n I’ve had put away for a couple of years after it was given to me. Alas, it has turned non-functional, but I do intend on sending it off to repair. Seems like another fine OM body. I also had an OM-4 in my hands for an afternoon, but it was also showing a glitch here and there, so it got returned to seller. I think I’d really enjoy shooting with that one.
Great work and thanks for putting this out into the world. I stumbled across a good deal on an OM-4. It's almost as small and it does have more information in the viewfinder. I assume Carrolton is the one in Georgia?
Yes, you are correct on both of those points. I briefly held an OM-4 in my hands a few months ago, but there were some issues and I didn’t keep it. But I did like the viewfinder. And the multi-spot metering would be fantastic.
I like my OM cameras - favorites being the OM-1n and the OM-4Ti. I never liked the 2, and the 3 was not something I felt paying for. That said, I find these little cameras pleasant and light to use, consistent performers, and easy enough once I get my mind around how to do everything! As I tend to shoot with aperture priority as I know the kind of DOF I want, it is only the timing that is of concern. As a result, I don't worry about too much in the viewfinder giving me other info. In fact, the less info in an SLR viewfinder, the easier, and that may be because I wear glasses. Nice review!
Thanks for tuning in! I think what you’re saying can be echoed among the many thousands of OM camera users over the last 50 years. You get used to using the camera and develop individual systems to make it work. If it were my main shooter, I’m sure I’d discover well within a year’s use that the lack of info in the viewfinder wouldn’t be a handicap. I have an OM-2n that I plan on reviewing in the not-to-distant future. So, I’ll be interested to see how I feel about having at least some of that info in the finder in AE mode.
My grandfather & uncle made it (them). I have 2 very rare Olympus Gold OM-X (autographed by grandfather, まいたんよしひさ) And the Olympus Gold M-1 (autographed by まいたんよしひさ & ATG). The last was OM-4 series. Then ATG came out with Rolleiflex 3000 series & Contax 645 that made Hasselablad & all medium in the history books. Soon in med 2024, ATG's X camera can flash sync up to 80,000! Vintage Camera Digest, very nice history of one of the best cameras at that time. The M-1 & OM-3 are collectables. You are correct that there are no information in the viewfinder. But no one used a Leica rangefinder said neg on the tiny viewfinder
Wow! Thanks so much for sharing that and tuning in to the channel. You have some one of a kind, priceless treasures there. I don’t think anyone would deny that the OM-1 (or M-1) was a game changer for the industry. So much value was packed into such a small package. And you are SO right about the viewfinder. I’m just spoiled by our modern cameras. But, no, Leica didn’t have that info in the viewfinder either. Very good point! Thanks again for watching. I’m glad I could do the camera justice.
My last acquisition in the OM system was a reworked M-1 that an Ebay seller was sourcing here in the US. The price (at the time) was about $245 which considering the work done on it didn't seem too bad to me. They did not modify the viewfinder info so as you say, the workflow is a bit "jerky" but the mechanical action of that camera, both the wind on and the shutter release and actuation is about the smoothest and finest I have ever experienced (I own a lot of Nikon, some Canon, Minolta, and Leica R, etc.). Even though a bit annoying, I overlook it because of the other benefits. Of course the OM-2n has moor info in the viewfinder and the OM-4T has even more, but it is still not quite the same feel as the M-1, at least for me. Thanks for another great video. I am going to have to break out some of the film gear and start burning some film!
Nothing like the feel of a smooth winder! I think the first time I was ever impressed with the operation of a film winding lever was a Nikon FE. Previously, I just thought they were all about the same. But that camera changed my mind.
Even though I now use an Olympus E-M1 Mk II and an E-M1 Mk III, I still have my OM-1N and OM-4T. I even used my OM-4T last year, when my two digital cameras were on loan to my oldest daughter and oldest granddaughter for the weekend. I love the operation, handling, and simplicity of the OM-4T, but overall I prefer digital.
I hope to try a nice OM-4 (T or standard version) at some point. I owned one for about 1 hr recently - until I discovered the auto-exposure was inop. It was nice!
My om1n needs a service, it's capping at 1/1000th. I loved it enough to pick up an OM4Ti too. The meter in the 4 is absolutely cracking, but the film wind doesn't quite fill me with the same joy (mine "rings" a bit after firing too), and it is just a shade bigger. The real selling point for me is the lenses. I have the kit 50mm f/1.8, as well as the 28mm and 100mm (both f/2.8). I have a couple of others, but those 3 are my "perfect kit". All the lenses having the same filter thread was just mind blowing after coming from an mft setup where every lens had something different.
Those lenses are great, aren’t they? Of all the systems I own, I have the least lenses for the OM. I’d love to have an actual Zuiko 28mm, instead of the Tamron version. Maybe one day. That 100mm sounds nice, though. For several years I used a Zuiko 50 1.4 for a good bit of video work. Having that aperture ring at the front made it work well. I had my hands on a OM-4 a couple of months ago, but had to return it because it wasn’t working in auto mode. It’s a shame because it was really a good price. Still on the lookout though!
@@vintagecameradigest I got the 100 after having the 135 for a while and finding it a little too long. The 100 is tiny, has reasonably close focus, and is really fast for the size. It's my favourite lens!
I used to think my perfect “kit” was a 50, a 28 and a 135. But nowadays I’m inclined to agree with you about the 135 being a bit long. I have a 100 2.8 Canon FD lens, and I do think I prefer that focal length.
What I really love about this camera is the design and the size, unfortunately I never felt attracted to the speed and shutter control on the lens and for me it's important too see your settings in the viewfinder, not something I could get used to easily
The size is certainly unique for the time. But I’m kinda like you on this. Camera size has never been the deciding factor for me. I would absolutely pick a Nikon F or F2 over the OM-1 any day. The shutter control is interesting but really slows me down in actual shooting. I have a friend who spent years as a photojournalist using these Olympus cameras. I don’t know how he did it. I think the OM-4 did finally incorporate full info in the viewfinder, but why save that for the flagship model when plenty of entry-level SLRs had been providing, at least, partial info for years?
As always, an awesomely thorough review. Not like those people who are fully qualified to review after shooting an entire roll (!) through a camera. I used one many years ago and learned several new points from this. However, a bone to pick. You compare it for size/weight to the Canon F-1 and the Nikon. Both of those were professional cameras with expected lifetimes of >100,000 shutter actuations. I still shoot my Canon F-1n bought new circa 1984 and its beginning to brass on the edges; it has so many options/features the OM-1 lacks, such as a top speed of 1/2000th, five viewfinders, many screens, backs, higher speed motor drive, etc. Wouldn't be fairer to compare the OM-1 to perhaps the Pentax MX, both well designed amateur cameras, nice but not professional?
Thanks, as always! So, to your point - the comparisons to the Canon F-1 and Nikon F are just meant to show what the competitors were doing at the time the OM-1 hit the market. The biggest difference being the size. The Pentax MX probably would be a more apples to apples comparison, but it debuted later (and probably was a direct result of the size of the OM). If we do compare the MX to the OM, the Pentax wins in my book because it had a full info viewfinder. If we compare the overall build quality of the OM vs the two “F’s”, yeah, I think the OM loses again.
I have an unusual question about the Olympus M-1 - the original Olympus film SLR. I always wanted to get an original Olympus M-1, made before Leica forced Olympus to change the name to OM . I am considering one now, however, the serial number on it is 2xx,xxx. I thought that Olympus started the production of M-1 with 100,000 and only made about 52,000 before switching the name to OM-1. I also heard that there are a number of fakes with M-1 top plate fitted on OM-1. Does anyone know the serial number range for the original Olympus M-1 film SLR? Thank you
Do you have Nikon FM or Pentax MX by any chance? It would be interesting to compare all 3 based on the information in the viewfinder and ergonomics in general. And, yeah, as many have already noticed, your channel stands out for its excellent production quality from the very first video! It’s a pleasure to watch
Many thanks! I do have a Nikon FM and used to have a Pentax MX. I think Pentax was the first one to respond/react to the Olympus design. And the MX, as well as the Nikon FM, have both exposure values visible in the viewfinder. I do still have a Pentax ME Super, which is even a bit smaller than the MX.
I would say (as with many things we utilise) that familiarity with those initially irksome controls is just that, a temporary inconvenience. I bought my first OM-1 back in the eighties, & I still have that original; mine is coupled up with a 55mm F 1.2. Your assertion that the viewfinder is unparalleled, cannot be contradicted; it's so versatile, lightweight, & affords incredible optical diversity. Alongside my Nikon FM (where you do indeed have all the information within the viewfinder), they are my go-to analogue bodies - an honourable mention should go to my Pentax MX too. Excellent overview - thank you !
Yes, I’ve come to agree with the familiarity concept for certain. When I said I’d been “spoiled” by the everything-in-the-viewfinder SLRs it meant just that. And being “spoiled” isn’t really a good thing, to be honest. In the case of the OMs, I can see there becomes an even more tangible connected-ness with the mechanics of the camera. Using “feel” alone to identify a set shutter-speed gives testament to the adage that the camera does become an extension of the photographer in a very real sense.
As a student (a lifetime ago), I took a job as a Photographer's Assistant; the money was rubbish, but what I learned in those holidays away from college, proved invaluable. It may be merely my perception, but many users of digital cameras seem to skip over many of the basics - & to that end, I see in their work, a laziness. The aforementioned "familiarity" is all but disappeared. It is my contention that any, one individual who is contemplating either a career (or hobby) in the discipline, begin with an analogue unit. In my humble opinion, that is the keystone - & certainly, all the photographers I admire, be they from the past or present, have a grounding in that fundamental knowledge - Irrespective of camera control placement. Wishing you a pleasant day ahead ! Best, Andrew
I tend to agree with that sentiment. With analogue we really have to trust the process and have confidence in our ability to recognize potential problems before hand. Digital takes us straight to the results where problems can be obvious. And based on those we can modify the approach. But analogue requires us to think through the process before we shoot. And that requires a level of understanding the basic photographic concepts. With digital photography I’m more reactive. With film, definitely proactive. Cheers!
I just received an Olympus OM1-n. But it only has a Macro lens. 55mm 3.5 Can I use that like a regular 50mm.? Will the photos come out clear like yours.? I don’t care about the low light and background blur for now. Just starting.
Might sound crazy but I’m seriously considering leaving canon for Olympus. I’m just beginning my journey so I’m still figuring out what I’m comfortable with. Plus I like the fact the newest Om-1 allows me to go out in some pretty bad weather with zero worries. But then there’s canon colors but I could always fix that with simple edits.
I think either system would work well enough once you get used to it. Each will have its benefits and drawbacks. But, I think lens choice might play the largest role in any decisions I’d make.
I own OM1 black, and is awsome camera that i use mostly in film, because huge viewfinder, but is not a perfect camera, i really liked your way to take pictures, is very well organized and quiet, and yours exposures are just perfect, i suscribe.
Thanks so much! As you said, it’s not a perfect camera - but I’d be hard-pressed to apply the label of “perfect” to any of them, really. But that’s what makes each one it’s own unique experience. For the OM series, I’d say that magnificent viewfinder is hard to beat!
With that said, the Nikon F4S from 1988 would be a behemoth then. I don’t understand why they had produced such a camera while knowing that the successfully design of the OM-1 had already taken a revolutionary changes in the 35mm market?! 😮
The F4s is indeed a behemoth. It’s probably twice the size and weight of the OM. And you could easily drive nails with the Nikon. Not so much with the Olympus. Nikon knew their bread and butter was working pros who tended to have their gear in rough and tumble places. And the F-series cameras could handle it. But I think Olympus produced such a small and light camera to be an option for pros who didn’t need that over the top build quality. It had its own niche.
I’m actually studying more on the picture composition side in your videos more than anything else. LOL 😆 You have a great eye 👁️ behind the curtain. I’m sensitive about picture composition in terms of The Golden Ratio (not The Rule Of Thirds) and Fibonacci Spiral. And the use of positive space and negative space.
Really enjoying the information you provide on vintage gear. I always thought the OM1 & OM2 cameras were some of the most aesthetically attractive and quality-built cameras of the day. However, not having exposure data visible in the view finder might just be a deal breaker for me! I can see how annoying it is just by watching you using the camera. Do you know if they, by chance, added it to the OM2?
Well, they “sort of” added it to the OM-2. In aperture-priority mode, you’ll see the auto-selected shutter speed in the viewfinder. But once you switch to manual mode, that info disappears and is replaced by the same match-needle set as in the OM-1. It’s crazy. These are physical (not LED) transparent overlays that move in and out of the viewfinder based on the mode. It seems to me that making that work would be more difficult than just keeping it in there to use in manual mode. But, I guess not. The OM-3 and OM-4 finally did include some info in the finder.
Probably some truth to that…And I tend to believe that the biggest selling point was that viewfinder. Big, bright and unmatched by any others of the time - and many that came afterwards. It would have been a shame to clutter it with too much info.
The Olympus OM-1 is (was) a very nice camera, but be aware that the fast shutter speeds can be too slow and you will get overexposed images. I will recommend using the OM-2 or OM2 SP which have electronic shutter.
The OM-1, OM-2 and OM-2 SP all have the same maximum shutter speed of 1/1000 of a second. Are you saying that your OM-1 wasn’t firing at a true 1/1000?
@@charliepragnell5791 The OM-1 has a mechanical controlled shutter which can be slow at fast shutter speeds, the OM-2 and OM-2 SP have electronic controlled shutter which do not have the problem. If you used negative film you would maybe not notice it, but I you used positive (slide) film you could see those was overexposed when using fast shutter speeds on the OM-1.
You don't have to keep pulling your eye away from the viewfinder because of lack of info. Just SET either speed or f stop, put your hand on f stop or speed and watch the needle.
I agree, the OM1 has too many minuses to make it a positive user. The optics are glorious, however. My Canon A-1 gave me an uncluttered viewfinder with a handy digital display of shutter and aperture, that can be turned off! Yup, I'm a Canon enthusiast!
The size of it is really the main selling point, I think. I have an OM-2n to feature at some point that, at least, does give me a bit more info in the finder - as long as I’m in auto mode. But once you switch back to manual, it all disappears again. 😑
What battery do you use? Also I’ve heard that the battery to replace the Hg battery affects the meter bc of the difference in voltage. Is that your experience? I have an OM1 and meter with a separate light meter
I just found out my OM-2n isn’t working correctly. I was getting ready to do an episode on it. Now I’m only sad. Guess I’ll add it to my “cameras to get repaired” list. Seems like a great camera, though.
Well, you can get the replacements on Amazon but they’re kinda pricey. I just usually cheat and use the modern 1.5v batteries. I’ve never noted a significant exposure error as a result.
I bought one (black version) and the micro prism is giving me tough time focusing as my eye sight is not as good as it used to be. Any tips for focusing?
I understand that completely! I’d check eBay for one of the following: screen 1-3 (split image only), screen 1-13 (split image + microprism) or screen 1-14 (diagonal split image + microprism). The prices seem pretty reasonable at the moment.
Hola¡ me gustaría preguntarte, estoy aprendiendo apenas fotografía, y tengo exactamente esta Olympus OM-1n, tengo un problema, la batería, ya que se que no las hacen más y me ha costado conseguir alguna otra opción. Es posible utilizarla sin batería y usar un fotómetro? Que me puedes recomendar. Gracias
I am happy that you are learning photography with a great camera! Yes, the battery is obsolete. But since it is only needed to power the meter, you can easily do without it by using one of the light meter apps on your phone. Or, as you said, an external light meter will also do fine. There are “new” replacement batteries available, but they are a bit expensive. Another option is to use a modern alkaline battery. The metering won’t be perfect but it does get close in many situations. This isn’t the best method, but it won’t damage the camera, and I’ve done it many times myself. Thanks for the question! Let me know if you have any others. I’m happy to help!
@@vintagecameradigest Muchas gracias por la respuesta y la información, me emociona empezar, ya descargue una aplicacion en el teléfono y vamos a ver como me va. Gracias
I have the M-1 and OM-1. You've pretty well summed it up. We have to view this camera as a compromise, at 52 years old it was the world's smallest 35mm full frame SLR. The M-1 came out in 1971 in Japan only and only 5000 were produced and it was withdrawn due to the Leitz copyright of the model name. The Pentax ME Super was a tiny bit smaller but had no shutter speed dial. And it came out four years later. The main issue was the prism old glue breakdown which contaminated the viewfinder but I had the M-1 prism replaced with an OM-40 prism and it is once again a beautiful viewfinder. There are ways of memorising which shutter speed you have selected by just keeping tabs on where you have gone from the original setting, and as for the aperture, the D.O.F. preview button gives you a visual of your focal range, so the F number is kind of irrelevant. I also purchased an Olympus Pen F half frame camera and a Pen F to OM lens mount adaptor so I can use my six OM/M System lenses on the tiny Pen F SLR. Both designed by Maitani, what a legend he was, R.I.P.
From what I’ve heard from other commenters, you’d be correct. Longtime users developed their own memorization methods to keep track of settings. And if one is familiar enough with fundamental concepts of exposure, it would be a good system for sure. That’s very interesting about the OM-Pen adapter. Didn’t know such magic existed. Very cool!
The Minolta XD-7 (XD-11 in the US) would answer most of your design concerns about the OM-1, It has aperture AND shutter speed info in the finder, a compact design with all the good features including DOF preview, mechanical self timer and three fully metered exposure modes. Electronic shutter speeds with one mechanical speed at, I think, 1/90th sec.@@vintagecameradigest
@@DominicRulikowski oh yes! The Minolta XD11 (US name) covered it all. A fine camera by any measure. I think it was one of the firsts (if not THE first) to offer both shutter and aperture-priority modes.
Thanks for watching! And thanks for confirming the actual pronunciation. In this part of the US I’ve never heard anything other than NY-kon. So, it’s good to get the info straight from the home country! Thanks!
Use it at your discretion since, to be fair, the way "Olympus" (which, unlike Nikon, it's a Japanese brand with a western name) is pronounced in Japan is atrocious. 👍
Bought mine in 2012 at second hand store for 250 euros. I still use it till this day, even more than my expensive leica m6 that i also bought at second hand store for 2000 euros😅😂 i take my om-1 everywhere with me for 12 years now. It's my first and favorite film camera.
It does travel well! Doesn’t require a lot of room. I took mine on holiday a few years ago, and it was quite effortless to carry around. Plus it’s darn good camera!
@@vintagecameradigestagree! I like the compact size of this camera. I’m more in a favor of small cameras haha I’ve had a period of time where I used lot of point and shoot cameras just because of its size. The OM-1 is just perfect and the viewfinder is amazing. The shutter speed and aperture settings on the lens were indeed a little tricky at first but I got used to it. I sometimes use an light meter app to meter, but since I’m so used to it by now, I do it by eye and feel.
@@vintagecameradigest btw I have a quick question: I recently bought a new Zuiko 35mm f2.8 lens of the market place. I noticed the aperture ring is “kinda” loose like, it makes slight rattling noise even though it works perfectly fine and clicks perfectly when setting the aperture. It’s just a annoyance but I was wondering if you have some advice for me to fix it. Excuse me for my OCD haha!🫣😜 apparently it’s normal behavior but if it can be fixed, I would love to know!
No, I get it. Stuff like that bugs me, too. I’ve never ventured into tearing down an OM Zuiko lens, though. So, I don’t have any clue what the cause might be. In other lenses, that might be a symptom of a missing or out of place ball bearing or pin that clicks the aperture into place. I’m not sure if the Zuiko lenses use bearings or another method for the detents. But if it is a bearing, one possibility is that it could have been repaired at some point and reassembled with the wrong size bearing. Those bearings are incredibly easy to lose when tearing down a lens. And could be that the repairer replaced it with whatever was on hand. Again, this is only my speculation. I actually have a junk 35 Zuiko around here somewhere. If I can find it, I’ll dig into it a little and see if the bearing theory is plausible.
@@vintagecameradigest thanks for the feedback. But yeah, that was my thoughts as well, even though it looks like it’s the right bearing, it’s not oversized or whatever. It’s just loose, like I can even slightly wobble it up and down and you can hear it very clear. Even when taking pictures, you accidentally touched the aperture ring😅 I wouldn’t say it’s the end of the world, and it doesn’t affect the pictures though, they look amazing and everything works fine when it comes to the aperture. It’s just the annoyances of it haha. I never encountered these issues so it’s a first. But I will look up to it. Let me know if one of your 35’s has this issue. th-cam.com/video/F5f_0Vx9_bo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=hHfuIIsjEQh3zTiP
somebody can please indicate accurately and tested which battery is actually good for this camera nowdays??? i put one lr44 with the adaptor mr09 but seems like the exposimeter is always underexposed. for example where other camera says the right exposure is at ss250 f1.4 iso 400, my om1 says that that exposure would be correct with ss60 f1.4 iso400 why is that? is my exposimeter not working well? thanks
Thank you for the excellent question. I happen to have one of the Wein 1.35v replacement batteries on hand AND a modern PX625A 1.5v. I just tested both on a Kodak gray card in low light and outdoors. For indoors, the 1.35v battery gave me a reading of 1/15 at f/3.5 at ISO400. The modern PX625A gave me a reading of 1/15 at f/4 at ISO400. In the outdoor setting, I got 1/250 at f/6.7 at ISO400 with the 1.35v battery. With the 1.5v battery (PX25A) I got a reading of 1/250 at f/8 at ISO400. I tested in both lighting scenarios to see if the difference was linear. In other words, was the difference the same in the low light situation as the bright light situation. This simple test seemed to confirm it is. So , it would suggest for the most accurate metering with a modern 1.5v battery, to set the ISO about 1/3 stop less than the actual film speed (since 1/2 stops on the ISO dial are not possible). So, with 400 speed film, set the ISO to 320 when using a modern 1.5v battery (PX625A). Now, I do not have the MR09 battery adaptor for the LR44 to compare. But, theoretically, it should give the same result as the PX625A. I’d be happy to hear from any others who have any experience with this. By the way, your original question seemed to state that instead of being underexposed, the OM-1 is showing a 2-stop OVERexposure (1/60 v 1/250 on the other camera). If this is indeed the case with the LR44 + Adapter in the OM-1, it would indicate a degree of meter inaccuracy. What we would normally expect using a battery with a higher output voltage would indeed be an underexposure. And this seems to track with the test I just ran with the comparison.
Let me chime in again since I think I only half-way answered your question. And this deals with the specifics of the MR09 adapter. A genuine MR09 should convert the shape of the battery as well as change the voltage to 1.35v. Hence the higher price tags. Kanto camera seems to be a popular brand that does this. Cheaper MR09 adapters my not really convert the voltage, only the shape. In any case, what I’ve learned is that a genuine MR09 requires a 10k ohm or lower resistance to work as it should. And that the Olympus OM-1 has a higher load resistance than the 10k. So, that battery adapter doesn’t function properly in the OM-1.
To me there is no real use for 35mm film camera anymore. There is no use case, where digital can't do practically everything better and much, much cheaper than 35mm film can. Consequently, I only shoot analog medium and large format nowadays. However, my OM-1 is one of the few 35mm cameras I've kept, for the rare occasion I might shoot 35mm. To me, besides the Leica R6 (which I also kept one of), the OM-1 is the best 35mm camera ever made, and a huge part of that are the Zuiko lenses, which are totally at par and sometimes even better than the Leica lenses. Shooting with the OM-1, because of its outstanding viewfinder, does not require checking aperture and shutter speeds all the time. Just look through your viewfinder and compose your picture with the intended depth of field and simply select the shutter speed to bring the needle to the middle. With a little experience, you will know if you need to hold the camera particularly steady or not, because you selected a large depth of field. I don't need to know that what I took the picture with is 125th with f 8 or a 60th with f 11. I need to know that the picture looks fine in the viewfinder - and there are no other viewfinder which allows better to do just that.
What you say is certainly in agreement with the other OM-1 users I’ve heard from. The lack of viewfinder info is certainly not a handicap. Many thanks for the comment!
Thanks for the question. Yes, I do develop my b+w myself. My go-to for many many years has been D-76 at a 1:1 dilution. I probably should try others more often, though. There are plenty of good ones out there.
Yeah, Nikon was doing what it could to not alienate its base of longtime pro users. So sticking to the same F-mount as on it’s F series cameras before was a necessity for them. And their AF system suffered a bit because of it. Canon, on the other hand, said to heck with that and developed the all NEW EF-mount. Which was probably a good business decision. It took Nikon a while to catch up.
@@vintagecameradigest I think Canon’s USM or Ultrasonic motor, lens driven technology is far quieter and faster (less power consumption to the batteries) than the body driven ones like the Nikon’s as you had pointed out the reason why they kept the F mount since 1959. No wonder Canon dared to take a big gambling to or against its competitors.
Yes, Canon did well with putting the motors in the lenses. So many of its competitors were using in-body motors. But most of them eventually came around and saw that was the way to go.
@@vintagecameradigest Do you think I can do it? It's just that I'm at a point in my life where I don't have much time for photography, so maybe I should sell it and buy a lighter digicam. So as not to ruin such a good camera.
Manual focusing is certainly different than what our modern cameras offer. So, it’s a bit of a skill, but I think it’s easily learnable. And this camera has one of the biggest and brightest viewfinder images ever. So that all works in your favor. But, if you think it just doesn’t work for you, I see no reason not to trade it for a newer camera. No camera should get in the way of your enjoyment of photography. So, whatever it takes to get joy out of photography I will endorse whole-heartedly.
I have an OLD F-1 that is a joy to use. And I have a Yashica 124G that I’ll be doing an episode on before too long. I’ll be using the Tele and Wide auxiliary lenses on it, too. Always good to check out the accessories. Or is that just my excuse to by more gear??😆
@@vintagecameradigest Yes, I have both, the F-1n (1976) and the New F-1 (1981). I agree the old one is a lot more fun to use due to its pure mechanical shutter design and less dealing with any electronic issues may have due to the age. But the T90 is real deal for work specially In photojournalism in a fast paced world these days. Luckily, I had bought the last one NOS from a closing camera store years ago. I actually like using it more than any Nikon’s flagship models if I’m not using the F-1n. I’m now only keeping an F2 and an F5 as paperweights. I still prefer manual focusing on my work (zone focus). I just don’t like camera decides where to focus for me in Street Photography. haha 😆
I love my OM1, actually all my Olympus cameras (1,2,4 in various versions) so much so that I want to have babies with them! I had my first OM1 back in 1974 from my first pay packet
You are fortunate in being able to afford to take so many shots of one subject most of us make do with one shot on film, you failed to mention the interchangeable focusing screens and the big problem for someone thinking of buying one a foam damaged prism, the 1.3v battery replacement is not quite so straightforward as you make out
Thanks for pointing out the issue with the foam/prism. It’s not an issue I’ve experienced, so good info to know. As for the battery, I’ve only used modern 1.5v cells for this camera. I admit it’s unorthodox and will affect the accuracy of the meter to some degree. But I’ve never experienced significant exposure problems because of it.
Thank you for your reply, when I had mine serviced they re-calibrated the meter to read correctly with a 1.5 battery the prism in mine is in good condition they said before prices started to increase they used to buy OM 10's just for the prism. I have added a link to a video you might like th-cam.com/video/V5ulyCj4Bew/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NsQSjxeQLLSg_kqX
Good to know it can actually be re-calibrated to work correctly with modern batteries. My guess would be that this is an adjustment that’s not commonly available for cameras with similar battery issues. I’m going to look into this more since now I’m intrigued. And thanks for the video link. I have watched several of his videos before, but not this one. Cheers!
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I always want to bring my Leica with me when I go out, but then I tell myself that it's too expensive to bring out, and I begrudgingly bring my OM-1. And then when I get the film back from both cameras, I consistently like the Olympus images more. It's just so easy and so well designed, and the viewfinder is so big and bright that I just always take better photos with it.
If I had a Leica, I’d probably feel guilty about NOT bringing it out, lol. But, yes, I get your point. The OM cameras completely bucked traditional design, and for what they are and how they operate, there are really few competitors. I guess you could make an argument for the Pentax MX or Minolta XD for size, but I think the OMs stand alone for overall design.
I agree. Although my M6 get's regular use, I might like my OM-*'s more at times. I just wish the film wind lever didn't feel like it was grinding sand comparatively to the M6.
Leica M2 here, and the same. I use my mint OM1 with the 50 1.8 far more…😂
Hi from Germany! 1st of all: very nice shots! I bought my OM1 1979 when I was 20 with 50mm/f1.8 and it was my very first SLR - I was more than happy&proud. And it is still in use, me now 65, the OM1 45 years in use - mostly now 50mm/f1.4 (upgraded the lens). The OM1 teaches you to slow down, to focus on taking pic, no hurry, no AF no information in the viewfinder - just you, your eye, the ASA, the roll in the cam, the time and the relaxed shooting. Love my OM1. Thx for sharing!
Greetings! Thanks for checking out the channel. The OM-1 can’t be denied as a fine camera. The idea of such an uncluttered viewfinder has grown on me since posting this. I don’t think I’ve ever used another camera as easy to focus as an OM body - even with my aging eyes. And I’m not surprised that yours has been going strong for 45 years. Such an elegant machine! Cheers!
Do you share your photos somewhere I can see ?
I've had my trusty OM-1 for over a decade now and it has never let me down. I've taken some of my favourite pictures with it, even though I mostly shoot 120 these days, I still get the urge to use my OM-1 as it's just so enjoyable and easy to use.
Thanks for tuning in! Yes, I think Olympus succeeded in delivering a camera that was fun to use while not being so big it became a hindrance to shooting.
What cameras do you shoot 120 with? I bought a Olympus Flex f2.8 three years ago, and I use it and my 35 mm om-1, but different days.
A few years ago (ahem) I bought an OM system from an old friend. He was downsizing and wanted to sell his kit as a package deal. I am a vintage lens fan (hoarder), so I made him and offer and he took it.
What I got was an OM-1 MD and an OM-2D plus a handful of mostly Zuiko lenses. I played with the lenses adapted to my NEX-5N (that long ago) and there are some keepers in the lot. I kept them all.
Back when I got started in photography, there were a lot of dedicated OM system professionals. I know they were attracted to the size and weight of the system. Once they learned the system, they were brand ambassadors for the most part.
Two things occurred to me watching you work the camera. First is that an angle finder would be a huge addition to the kit for your style of shooting. Second is working out a system for knowing where you were regarding aperture and shutter speed without having to look. For the latter, counting clicks would do it. I think the same for the former. That's how I would approach it.
Olympus also made a 40mm f/2 lens that is very nice. I'm a fan of that focal length over the nifty-fifty and have the 40mm Zuiko in my collection. (I have a 40mm f/1.8 Hexanon in my collection as well and it's a great lens!)
You didn't mention your processing of the film, so I'd guess you used D-76 for it. I sure used a lot of D-76 and Microdol-X in the day. I might have to stock up and find my cans so I can process some film.
Thanks for the video. It's good stuff.
Nice to hear from a fellow vintage gear “fan”. I have a friend who spent most of his early photojournalism career with these OM cameras. And loved them. So my very limited use of this camera doesn’t really add up to a real working experience. I think it’s design is unique, but it does require a little more general exposure knowledge from the user than some of its competitors - especially when you start to count clicks to divine your shutter speeds and f/stops. I actually took this camera on a week-long summer trip several years ago. And by the end of the week, I was pretty comfortable and confident with counting the clicks to determine my settings. So I think you’re correct on that.
I probably would make good use out of an angle finder, lol! It would certainly be better for my knees and back. One of these days I’ll get down there and not be able to get back up. And it’ll be filmed for all to see :-)
I’m glad to hear your praise of the 40 f/2 - and especially the Hexanon 40 1.8 - as I do have one of those in my Konica kit. I’ve used it very little so far, but I’ll be getting an episode ready on the AutoReflex T series cameras very soon.
As for the processing - you are right on the money: D-76 1:1 is my go to. Although recently I’ve begun to explore others just to expand my experience. Not afraid of learning new tricks! Cheers!
@@vintagecameradigest I have an angle finder if you're interested in one!
My Dad bought one back in 1980. He gave me his old camera, a Zenit EM on the same day. It got me into photography, and I've enjoyed the hobby ever since. I was 13 years old at the time.
What a great age to discover photography! Looks like we’re about the same age, then. It took me a few more years before I decided to get serious about it. I was out of high school before I got a “real” camera. But I still look back fondly on that cheapo 110 camera I got from K-mart when I was about 10 yrs old. It was very empowering to me that I could choose the subject - what mattered and what didn’t. Ah, the memories….
The two camera's i mainly shoot with!
Just got this one from a second hand shop for $75 with a 50 mm. Zuiko F/1.8 lens and a 135 mm f/3.5. Both working. This was helpful, thanks! 👍
Very nice! And what a great price! I think you’ll love it.
I've had both an OM-1 and an OM-1 MD camera since the early 70s and I still use them on a regular basis. Also I have an OM-10 that I had bought new for my wife and the light meter was really inconsistent so she rarely used it. Recently I decided to give it a try after it had been in a box for about thirty years. When I inspected the camera I discovered a piece of debris inside of the manual adapter hole. Now I have a nearly new forty year camera that works perfectly!
I like how that story ended up! Something “new” to shoot with! I think the OM-10 is a great camera, too - especially with the manual adapter. I was gifted one several years ago and was told it probably didn’t work. But it did! And I might like it just a little bit better than the OM-1.
I picked up an Olympus OM1 several years ago while stationed in RI and didn't use it much until I retired. I love this camera! I do not mind taking my eye off the viewfinder and checking Fstop and shutter speed because I usually don't film anything moving. And after many uses, counting the clicks seems to be very accurate for me.I do love the size and weight of this camera. Great video and information.
Counting clicks and learning where the grips are on the shutter ring to determine your speed seems to be the the solution to the dilemma. Lots of people have echoed that technique works. I’m sure my experience would change the more familiar with the camera I become, and that would eventually be a non-issue. You certainly can’t beat the size of the camera. And that viewfinder…..just wow.
The best thing about this camera is that one does not need to worry about the batteries failing as the camera is entirely mechanical. I have an OM1n and I personally can't fault it. Back when I first started using one in 1990-ish it was the lenses that had me sticking with Olympus. I "upgraded" to an OM2sp which I preferred as it has spot metering but while to this day it is my favourite OM system camera it is flawed in that the electronics are faulty and cause the battery to drain too quickly- I was literally replacing batteries on an almost weekly basis but I digress.
A couple of weeks ago I took a roll of out-dated XP2 with the OM1n mainly to test it as I'd just had it repaired (the film advance mech was faulty) and I really loved how the photos came out. The sharps of the photos was due to the lovely Zuiko 50mm f1.8 no doubt but also, after so many years of film photography, getting the exposure right has become almost instinctive, and having a very large and bright viewfinder makes it fairly easy (for me at least :) Yes, the meter helps but I use it more as a guide than anything else.
I enjoyed your vid, thank you.
You’re absolutely right - having a manually controlled shutter is a huge benefit. I probably should have stressed that a bit more in the video. And that’s interesting to note about the OM-2sp and battery drain. I’ll definitely keep that in mind as I’m looking around. I have an OM-2n that was gifted to me but haven’t shot with it yet. I wonder if it will have the same issue?
@@vintagecameradigest
Oh, the OM2n is near perfect, basically and OM1 but with an electronic shutter and an aperture priority auto mode. In fact, the only noticeable differences are the shutter sounds a bit different, a little quieter perhaps and, in auto mode, a little shutter speed scale moves into the viewfinder to tell you what shutter speed the camera has chosen. It does have an off switch but it is never off. It will take photos even when turned off though I'm not sure if it reverts to auto or manual mode but in my experience the photos are often well exposed so I assume auto. The batteries are good for six months to even a year. Again, in my experience.
The metering is surprisingly accurate in the OM2n and SP particularly for long exposures in auto- up to ten minutes I believe. That' one thing Olympus really nailed with the OM2 and OM4 variants. That and the excellent Zuiko lenses.
Awesome info there. Thanks! I’ll need to get that out and shoot sooner rather than later. Sounds like it will be a slight step up from this one.
My parents bought me one of these in 1977 when i was going into the Peace Corps. I took it all over the Philippines for my job and then used it for years after. Used on board outrigger boats, in rice paddies, and on remote islands. I loved this camera and only gave it away when the daughter of a friend of mine was taking a photography course and she loved it as much as i did. Thinking about getting another
Very kind of you to pass that camera on to the next generation. I hope she got a lot of good use from it. It really is a nice camera. I think you’d love to have one again. Like a visit from an old, dear friend!
Only someone that joined the peace corps would be so generous as to gift such a nice camera. Makes me ashamed of myself.
My first serious camera and in many ways still my favorite manual match-needle camera, but hey! I'm a minimalist person.
At the time, having optical info about aperture in the finder was impossible in the OM1, with the aperture ring in the front of the lens at various distances from the prism depending on the lens used.
With this clarified we now turn to the shutter speed: with the handles of the ring in the horizontal, level, we instantly know that the speed is 1/60, a common speed for static subjects and also the sync speed for flash. Our baseline.
With that in our head, we can feel what shutter we are using if we count the clicks to the right or left, and it's easy, with practice, to know it.
Plus, each click in the shutter ring is mirrored in the aperture ring, so if we turn both rings the same amount in the same direction we keep the same exposure. Or control bracketing
With our left hand doing all the active work, focusing etc... our right hand is only used to shoot and advance, making still for me the best handling 35mm camera of all time.
All this view info was later introduced in later models in the range, particularly the OM-2, electronic and automatic aperture priority, with aperture and shutter in the finder, with auto exposure reaching way over 120 seconds, and auto cordless multiple flash metering trough the lens, the OM-2 was a technological breakthrough!
Also the top of the line and end of an era OM-4 TI.
I'm still a fan of the command layout of these cameras, logical and intuitive in my view: one hand for exposure, the other for shooting.
Although I think the on-off switch could be better placed, around the shutter release, with a lock, like in the Nikons. Perhaps my only critic in terms of design and handling.
You are right. The more familiar you are with the camera, the easier it is to know it by feel. And I certainly appreciate the fact that both shutter speed and aperture are controlled with one hand. That benefit wasn’t immediately clear to me, but at some point it dawned on me just how useful that is. The OM’s are a unique design among the rest of the field. And I’m glad they stuck to it. They knew they had a good thing going.
Fifty years ago I was given a new early OM-1 for my 21st birthday. It was a lovely thing. I've had many Olympus SLRs since plus a lot of their lenses. Then life made me sell everything and when I started photography again I went the Nikon way but realised I should not have strayed.
So I am awaiting delivery of a Pen E-5 with kit lenses from a dealer in Japan. It will be my first foray into 4:3rds and I'm eagerly awaiting delivery. I shall sell my Nikon stuff.
I think the entire Olympus lineage is unique. Unique in design and vision. And still a pleasure to use to this day. Now, I like my Nikon gear for other reasons, but Olympus (at least until the 90s) was a terrific option for non-AF users. Enjoy that Pen E-5! And thanks for watching!
@@vintagecameradigest 👍🤓👍
I still have my OM-1 from 1977. It is still fun to use. It was my first 35mm camera so I don’t see the “quirks”, I just used them as they are. Thanks for the great post. You have re-inspired me to get out and do some shooting with it again. 26:06 19-Feb-2024
Then this video is a success! Glad you enjoyed it!
Ive used many 35mm cameras including Leicas, Pentax, Canon, Nikon and more. None preferred in my hand more than my OM1. It has never missed an exposure, no matter how bright the sky, how dark the background. Even with off the shelf batteries the light meter is dead accurate. People claim otherwise but ive had perfect luck with off the shelf batteries.
Zuiko Glass is incredibly sharp, and beyond normal consumer grade. Truly a wonder of a gem.
I usually go for the modern batteries, as well. Never had any major exposure errors. I do know I need to shoot this camera more often. It's a nice one.
which batteries do you get ? 1,5V px625 ? I saw people saying that the difference between the 1,3 mercury batteries and 1,5V can alter the light meter...
Nice to know I’m not the only one with a vintage camera GAS problem 😉 Love the channel and content.
Problem?? What problem?? :-) Thanks for tuning in!
Loved your video. I began shooting with the OM4 in 1986 and loved the experience. Still have it with many Olympus Zuiko lenses. Started using Olympus digital cameras in 2013 and added Sony FF cameras and glass in 2018. Have kept all of my Olympus gear as I love the size, feel of cameras and quality of lenses. I do use Olympus Zuiko glass on my Sony FF cameras periodically. Recently studied the work of Jane Brown an English photographer who shot with the OM 1 for decades, her work led me to look for the OM 1 today. Before buying I explored You Tube and found your video. I will most certainly buy one now. Thank you. BTW my most treasured Olympus Zuiko lens is a 55 mm f1.2.
The OM-1 is a very popular camera these days. And the ease of adapting the Zuiko lenses to other mounts makes the system that much more flexible. I’ve never even held one of the 55 1.2s - must be an amazing lens!
First off great video. I shoot with both OM-1 and OM-2 and at first I struggled with same user application as you did, however the more I used it the better the muscle memory and I could now adjust both shutter and aperture without removing the camera from my face.
Many thanks! Yes, I do realize that my limited use of the camera hardly counts as any real experience. And what you say about muscle memory sounds totally achievable. I can see how you’d eventually get a feel for how the position of the those two knurled grips on the shutter ring relate to a specific speed. Interestingly, this would be impossible on a traditional shutter dial - since it’s just a round dial. In any case, you’ve gotta give props to Olympus for a refreshing take on SLR design. Thanks for tuning in!
My parents bought me my first SLR for Christmas when I was 14, It was the Minolta SRT101. My 2nd camera was the OM-1 that I purchased from a classmate in photography school in 1979. I still have it today and love it just as much as when I first purchased it.
Very cool. I don’t think I’ve ever met an Olympus OM-1 shooter that was disappointed with the camera. And that viewfinder is no less than spectacular.
The OM-1 was my first SLR back in the 1980's when I was a teenager. My father had an OM-2 at the time. This allowed us to share lenses. I still have my OM-1 in storage somewhere. And I am still using Olympus OM Zuiko lenses on Canon EOS-M and EOS-R bodies and a Red Komodo. The Olympus lenses are still remarkable.
And the lenses are tiny - even among their contemporaries. Glad you’re getting good use out of them still!
@ 18:06 the item is a mechanical speed governor for a steam engine (Centrifugal Governor). The metal balls swing in a circle as the machine runs and it governs how much steam is allowed into the valving controlling the speed.
This is why I love the comments. I get to learn things I don’t know. 👍
as someone who learned photography on a OM-1, I personally adore it, and its weird shutter dial. the OM-2 is a touch easier with its Aperture priority feature, but I usually just use it to get a quick reading, and then hop to manual control to tune it in.
It is a nice camera. I have an old photojournalist friend who used OM cameras for the most of his film-era career. He swears by them. I’m sure if I stuck with the camera for a while, I’d develop a better appreciation for the design. And since I recently acquired an OM-2n, I’m anxious to revisit the OM system. Soon!
@@vintagecameradigest you HAVE to try some long night exposures with the automatic feature on the OM-2. I don't think it has disappointed me yet
I’ll try to make that part of the shoot. Most all my shooting sessions have been in the daylight, and I really haven’t put some of these longer shutter speeds and auto features to use.
Have an OM-1 I inherited from my father. By far the best cameri I have ever owned.
It’s truly a fine camera once you get used to its quirks. And yours has the added benefit of holding sentimental value and provenance - which is probably the best reason of all. Every camera I own has a backstory. Unfortunately, I’ll never know what they are for the most part.
I bought the OM-1 late 70’s. Still have it but eventually the OM 4t became my workhorse. Yes the left hand controls focus, shutter speed and the aperture which is brilliant. As for having to look down for info on the speed and stops, no problem at all, once you learn reciprocity (the law of) zero the camera to where you want it and going up or down matters not if you know reciprocity. Its easy when you become the CPU. 😊
Yes, I’ve heard from many viewers who are long-time OM-1 users that the design eventually becomes a non-issue. And it does make sense that would be the case. A fine camera, no doubt.
12:06 is a great still life. you're becoming one of the channels i look forward to the most!
So kind of you to say! I really appreciate it!
Either you have the know-how or you are a natural born video maker. Anyway, thank you for the pleasure of watching these 26:11 minutes in another video that entertains, informs, and inspires a lot. Every time I see one, I immediately feel a need to pick up a camera and go shoot.
In December 1979, when I bought the nostalgic Modern Photography magazine, before reading the articles, I delighted myself with the ads one by one in all their detail and, on that day, among Minolta XD11, XD5 or XG9, the whole new Canon A-series range, in a beautiful two-page ad, and several other camera brands, on that very day I set the goal to buy a Olympus OM1 or OM2, as soon as I earn my own money. They looked astonishing with their beautiful top pyramid, that should never be spoiled with a hot shoe :)
A few years later, on my first job, I finally got a used OM2n, which I still have and shoot often. Although cameras without electronics are very much appreciated, I was a early adopter of everything computer-related, so at the time I didn’t hesitate on the OM2n over the OM1 also for the advantage that, when in automatic mode, which is a aperture priority, it shows a nice speed scale on the viewfinder's left side, with a needle pointing to the photometer chosen speed, much more useful than the manual mode information.
In addition to your aforementioned “thinking out loud”, you have another not common feature, comparing to other videos posted, that also contributes a lot to the richness of your work, which is you take several photos of the same theme, with the same framing but several diferent exposures or, just varying the framing, or both. Nowadays, with digital for “free” and the analogue climbing costs, many photographers have put the brakes on their shots, making each 35mm roll give 37 or 38 different images, if possible. Now, although everyone understands it perfectly, the truth is that it’s not the best way to do it, so I appreciate a lot to watch you working the “proper” way that photography deserves. Some time ago I read Mastherson’s The Leica Way book, published by Focal Press, and I found it curious the change in context from that era, 1953, to the one we have in 2023 because, what we currently think about analogue photography, which is to use and spend with great moderation, while with digital, the word is to shoot indiscriminately, in that book the writer explained and encouraged readers to make several shots, such as needed to get sure of a correct exposure, calling it the way to use advantages of the “new” 35mm, the size and number of photos the reader can get from a single roll, compared to the large formats cameras.
Well, making a long story short, I hope the new video is already being cooked.
Cheers
Thank you, thank you, and thank you. The next episode is currently simmering nicely. Although, earlier today I was out with a Ricohmatic 225 TLR (making amazing photos, mind you 😁) and realized that the film advance wasn’t working correctly. So your comment adds a bit of cheer to a frustrating afternoon. And I do thank you.
It’s funny mentioning those old ads - I loved them. I even have a section on my website dedicated to just that because I knew I wasn’t the only one who enjoyed them. I’ve got about 1200 on there from the 1930s to the 1990s. Check them out when you have an afternoon to kill. Those are still where I get most of the inspiration to review certain cameras. But now we have the benefit of hindsight, so it’s interesting to compare the claims against the actual user experience.
I was gifted an OM-2n a couple of years ago and do enjoy that over the OM-1. The info available - even if it’s only in auto mode - makes it much more usable to me. When I first got it, though, I was super excited that it had the shutter speeds in the finder - only to find they disappeared in manual mode. It seemed to me that the mechanism for moving the transparent overlay OUT of the viewfinder would be much more difficult than leaving it there in the finder, to be used for metering in manual. But I suppose it wasn’t since Olympus didn’t do it. Although, they did improve the finder for the OM-3 and OM-4.
Also glad you enjoy my shooting method. I could easily take an entire roll on the same subject - hopefully to distill the best image out of it. But that would be pretty boring, I think, lol. But maybe not. Who knows how this channel will evolve? Always keeping options open. But that’s interesting about the Leica book. I do suppose that when 35mm was relatively new it was sort of freeing - especially when compared to 120 or larger. I do find myself “editing on the fly” sometimes when shooting bigger formats - knowing that I only have so many shots. So I really enjoy having a a bag full of 35mm when the camera calls for it!
Again, many thanks for the kind words! Hopefully you’ll enjoy the next episode!
All the best!
Very nice photos man - will get one as well with the 50mm
It’s a great one. That viewfinder is something to behold.
Bought my first OM-1 when they came out while in college shooting for my college yearbook and newspaper. Those two bodies carried me through into my newspaper photographer days. Eventually I moved on to Nikon since that was what the rest of the staff shooters had and we could share lenses. But I always loved that small simple body. I like a smaller body still. I still have my two bodies and three lenses and all are in good working condition. Thanks for the inspiration. I’ll go load them up.
I think the compactness of the system is the biggest selling point. Super easy to carry around. And of course the lenses are great. I’ve got my eye on an OM-4 I hope to try out soon. Will be fun to compare these two!
Very enjoyable, I wish I could walk that trail. Your photos were gorgeous too. Last video I watched was with that medium format monster! Thanks.
Yes I'll be considering the OM-1 or as you noted, an MX.
Thanks! Either of those cameras would be good choices.
Few years ago my daughter bought me an Olympus OM1n as a replacement for an (otherwise excellent) OM2sp that my dad gave me back in the day (which begun to fail), and I'm happy with it like a pig in the mud. I'm a casual film shooter, so I don't need anything but a bare bone camera, and I'm not even bothered by a battery since I mostly use external light meters with my film cameras.
BTW, OM1n was allegedly produced until 1987.
Thanks for that info. I hadn’t researched how long that line was produced. So, looks like the production run on these fine cameras went all the way up to the new AF designed cameras. Which I think turned out to be a terrible way to honor the legacy of the OMs. Maybe Olympus thought that AF wasn’t something that would appeal to pros. And when it turned out that it did, they had little to offer. Still, the manual focus line of the OMs - any of them really - were excellent photo tools with a superb form factor.
@@vintagecameradigest Yes, OM 707 AF from 1986. was a pure disaster. They changed the mount course the shutter speed ring was in the way of the micro motor for the autofocus. Everybody wanted to jump that Minolta AF wagon. Even worst, had they waited a few more years they could implement Canon's way of autofocus via electronic contacts and AF motor in the lens to bypass that speed ring what could make all old lenses compatible...
For real! I bought one of the 707s last year, mostly out of curiosity, but also to compare to the other first-generation AF offerings from all the other manufacturers. I was completely surprised. And the lenses didn’t offer a manual focus ring! Hard to believe it was from the same company that produced such great OM bodies.
@@vintagecameradigest well,an CEO in any given company has a final say. And if you wanna know how things had gone at Olympus, just watch "Olympus has fallen" here on tube. Not the movie, but the documentary...
I took a photography class soon after I bought my first 35mm camera. A young guy, ( I was 23 and he was in his teens ), in that class was shooting an OM-1 with what I thought was great results! That was the only time I can remember ever seeing one of these cameras. If I get the chance I'll add one to my small group. When you do a review, I always feel like I really got in depth info... pro and con. Thank you!!
I appreciate that. I try to be balanced in my assessments and not just a fanboy of every camera. Although I am, sorta, lol. The OMs and their lenses are compact and, like I mentioned, the viewfinder can’t be beat. Thanks for watching!
I’ve owned several OM-1n’s. I should have kept the first one I owned bc the meter was accurate. But I’m gonna recommend this to people: look for a nice OM-2n. It is an aperture priority camera with sophisticated metering… AND… switch it to manual and you have a virtual OM-1. You have your cake and eat it, too, lol
I’m inclined to agree with you on that. It’s good to have that choice.
The texture of photos was excellent❤
Thank you!
Love the presentation and the poster!
Thanks! And glad you can appreciate my love of pop culture :-))
Nice little camera, i have the original OM1 and the OM1n. The lenses are small and tack sharp. I think the closest competitor is the Pentax MX. Thanks for sharing.
You’re correct. Olympus absolutely inspired the Pentax MX and ME (which I think holds the record for being smallest). And Minolta went small, too, after that with the XD series. But these OM models are a real joy to use. You can NOT beat the viewfinder!
I had the OM-10 in the 80:s, and last year I bought the OM-1. As I normally shoot digital, I also lacked info like you. But it's a different thing to shoot analog. You have to slow down, because if film costs. And that makes me not concerned about the lack of time or speed in the viewfinder. I makes it a ritual to shoot analogue, and then I like lacking info all the time. I also shoot with the Olympus Flex, and that camera is completely without metering. I use my digital om-d camera as light meter when I start, but then I go completely by feeling. It works. It makes shooting meditation. I like that out of control - into the feeling mode. Otherwise, I should only shoot digital.
Yes, there’s something about the OM cameras that put you in a different head-space. I’ve sort of mellowed on my stance regarding the viewfinder. I’m always blown away by the size and brightness and it helps me put up with a few quirks of the camera. But I like how you equate it to meditation. That’s quite on point.
I love the OM cameras. I have a few of them. OM1, OM2, OM4, and OM4Ti. Most of the time, I use the OM2n. Great job with the video.!
Thank you! I really do love the size and viewfinder of the OMs. I have an OM2n that I need to get out and shoot. From what I’ve seen from playing around with it, I think it will be my favorite, too. Thanks for watching!
I also tend to use my OM-2N more than anything else. Hits that perfect midpoint of convenience and fun 😄
I’ll be looking forward to getting that one out, then!
Excellent review, thank you very much. I've already seen a few of your videos and besides giving very good information about cameras, I think your photography is very good despite the forced nature of having to make a roll of a subject chosen for the occasion and being able to show the virtues of the camera, lens and film chosen. Speaking of films, I think the Tmax 100 or 400 would work very well for textures, replacing the Tx, which is very good for general photography but perhaps not so good for taking advantage of textures and details, just an opinion.
Many thanks! Yes, it does feel a bit forced sometimes, but it’s a good challenge for me to continue to develop my creative vision. TMax 400 was my favorite 400 for many years. I still do like it. I sort of bounce back and forth between it and Tri-X and HP5.
I have one and I enjoy the no frills experience when I take it out shooting.
It definitely helps me get back to basics. Which isn’t a bad thing.
Ok, I am a die hard fan of the small body, all mechanical 35mm SLR’s. So much so, I own more than one of each one of the following..The Pentax MX, the Nikon FM, and of course the Olympus OM-1 (in both the 1 and the 1N versions) as well as a Nikon FM2, but I’m not including it in my comparison of the other three. While all do have their pros and cons, at the end of the day my favorite is the OM-1. I too, hated the shutter speed and aperture adjustment locations at first. But after shooting a few rolls I found myself never having to take my eye away from the viewfinder. I just got use to the position of the Shutter speed dial, and could easily count where the f/stop was. I love the viewfinder and I really love the lenses. I have a high serial number 50mm f/1.4 lens (above the 1,100,000) that is in my opinion the best of the 50 1.4 lenses. While I do love the Nikon FM, and I enjoy the Pentax for what it is, the OM-1 just feels right to me. Great video.
Thanks for watching! At one point I had all these (but just one of each, lol), but eventually parted with the MX. It just didn’t excite me to use. I’ll definitely hold on to the OM-1 and FM, though. I can see how you could eventually get used to knowing what speed you were using based on the location of the ring. Others have mentioned that, too. So, definitely not a dealbreaker at all. I just need to give it a bit more time to get used to.
Thanks for watching! At one point I had all these (but just one of each, lol), but eventually parted with the MX. It just didn’t excite me to use. I’ll definitely hold on to the OM-1 and FM, though. I can see how you could eventually get used to knowing what speed you were using based on the location of the ring. Others have mentioned that, too. So, definitely not a dealbreaker at all. I just need to give it a bit more time to get used to.
I tend to shoot the OM-1n as a shutter priority camera. I’ll set the shutter speed based on the lens I’m using and the subject matter and then I’ll adjust the aperture to get the exposure I want. If I do need to change the shutter speed, I remember the base shutter speed I had it set at and adjust off that without taking the camera away from my eye. The one thing I do have a tendency to forget though is which way to adjust the shutter speed dial. 🥴
That method does make sense. And several of the commenters who shoot with these cameras regularly have a similar way of doing it. I’m sure if I used the camera on a more regular basis, I’d also develop a workable method. It’s definitely a camera that requires a bit of learning - maybe an “acquired taste”? And I think that if you experience the viewfinder, you’ll be more apt to follow through on it.
@@vintagecameradigest Right, the OM viewfinder is a thing of beauty. Makes manually focusing so much easier for these aging eyes. My OM-2n and OM-4T also have the same big and bright viewfinder.
I have owned my OM1n since 1978 and still works fine. This version can use a drive too although no idea what the n stands for. I have a 24mm lens attached and some Tamron lenses to use with it. The only camera I kept from new and won’t part with it. Agree the lack of info in viewfinder is a pain but not a deal breaker. No true replacement battery is the biggest disappointment as don’t like having present arrangement, these batteries, originally made for hearing aids leak like hell and once activated continue to drain even when not in use. I use a hand exposure meter instead. Thanks for your review.
Thanks for tuning in! I think the “n” just stands for “new” version of that classic. I think if I were to use the camera enough, I’d get a feel for the controls without actually having to look at them - especially the shutter speeds. It’s definitely a nice camera!
I think the shutter sound is quite pleasing.
Oh yes
thanks for sharing. good review, It is a camera from the 70s and a minimalist camera
Thanks for watching!
I’d love to see the reaction of a young photography enthusiast who grew up with digital cams the first time they look through a film viewfinder! The info in the vf is great (on my modern em1 mk3) but man I miss the big beautiful vf on my old film slr.
Especially with this camera. That viewfinder is magnificent.
Wow, what a beautiful camera and that lens is just amazing.
Thanks! This is the older 50 1.4 version with the chrome ring. I hear the newer ones without the chrome are even better.
To know where you’re at in terms of shutter speed grab the ring and remember that when the finger bits tilt slightly to the left you’re at 1/60. It is that simple
Yes, that seems to be the general consensus of OM users. After enough use you get a feel for where the shutter is set from the position of the grips. Makes total sense.
It has a mirror lockup function too? Wow! Even the Canon flagship New F-1 (from 1981) ‘pro leveled’ didn’t have! 😮
Good to know. 🎉
MLU was pretty common on cameras in the mid-late 60s and early 70s. It may have had more to do with ability to mount super-wide angle lenses than control vibration - although that was a nice secondary feature. Some of those old super wides would sit so far back in the mirror box that the mirror wouldn’t clear them as it flipped up. So having MLU was almost necessary. Bronica got around that issue with their S-series cameras by having the mirror drop down and slide under the rear elements of its lenses. Very unique solution.
The mirror lockup was for macro and microscope photography. The OM system at the time had a massive selection of pro level equipment, such as Bellows, adaptors for microscopes, macro lenses etc. So the mirror lockup was to reduce vibration for the extreme magnifications.
Awesome I love this video a lot. Recently got an OM2.
Good choice! Same form-factor. Great handling. Thanks for watching!
The M name fiasco was a hint on where Maitani-san took great inspiration from: the Leica M series (but he owned a Leica III though). From the rewind lever to the placement of the aperture control (all rangefinder lenses have this anyway) to the footprint and small size of the camera (and lenses and accessories) itself, the Olympus OM is parallel to the Leica M, so much that I call it the "true" 'Leica' or Leica-style SLR.
For note: the "M" in this camera comes from Maitani, while the "M" in Leica stands for the German word for rangefinder, "Messsucher" (literally meaning 'measuring finder').
And oh, I own an OM-1MD an OM-2SP (only bought because the seller wouldn't part it with the lens, which I was really after for). My current kit includes a 50/1.4 (came with OM-1), a 100/2.8, and a 28/2.8 (came with the OM-2SP). Out of all my cameras systems called (Leica M, Leica LTM, Nikon F, Kiev/Contax, and a couple of point and shoots), this one is the most used and my go-to for all kinds of shooting. Now, if only I can have hands on that 50/3.5 macro, I'd be satisfied.
The fascination with the Leica makes perfect sense. And I can see the parallels. What I did not know about these old Olympus bodies is how much people absolutely love them. And it’s no guess as to why.
I was looking forward to doing an episode on an OM-2n I’ve had put away for a couple of years after it was given to me. Alas, it has turned non-functional, but I do intend on sending it off to repair. Seems like another fine OM body. I also had an OM-4 in my hands for an afternoon, but it was also showing a glitch here and there, so it got returned to seller. I think I’d really enjoy shooting with that one.
I've never owned one, but the camera looked very elegant. You're right about the viewfinder information; I think it's too limited.
It’s definitely a good looking camera, and the size makes it quite interesting. But yeah…the lack of info sort of gets in the way.
Great work and thanks for putting this out into the world. I stumbled across a good deal on an OM-4. It's almost as small and it does have more information in the viewfinder. I assume Carrolton is the one in Georgia?
Yes, you are correct on both of those points. I briefly held an OM-4 in my hands a few months ago, but there were some issues and I didn’t keep it. But I did like the viewfinder. And the multi-spot metering would be fantastic.
I like my OM cameras - favorites being the OM-1n and the OM-4Ti. I never liked the 2, and the 3 was not something I felt paying for. That said, I find these little cameras pleasant and light to use, consistent performers, and easy enough once I get my mind around how to do everything! As I tend to shoot with aperture priority as I know the kind of DOF I want, it is only the timing that is of concern. As a result, I don't worry about too much in the viewfinder giving me other info. In fact, the less info in an SLR viewfinder, the easier, and that may be because I wear glasses. Nice review!
Thanks for tuning in! I think what you’re saying can be echoed among the many thousands of OM camera users over the last 50 years. You get used to using the camera and develop individual systems to make it work. If it were my main shooter, I’m sure I’d discover well within a year’s use that the lack of info in the viewfinder wouldn’t be a handicap. I have an OM-2n that I plan on reviewing in the not-to-distant future. So, I’ll be interested to see how I feel about having at least some of that info in the finder in AE mode.
My grandfather & uncle made it (them). I have 2 very rare Olympus Gold OM-X (autographed by grandfather, まいたんよしひさ)
And the Olympus Gold M-1 (autographed by まいたんよしひさ & ATG). The last was OM-4 series.
Then ATG came out with Rolleiflex 3000 series & Contax 645 that made Hasselablad & all medium in the history books.
Soon in med 2024, ATG's X camera can flash sync up to 80,000!
Vintage Camera Digest, very nice history of one of the best cameras at that time. The M-1 & OM-3 are collectables.
You are correct that there are no information in the viewfinder. But no one used a Leica rangefinder said neg on the tiny viewfinder
Wow! Thanks so much for sharing that and tuning in to the channel. You have some one of a kind, priceless treasures there. I don’t think anyone would deny that the OM-1 (or M-1) was a game changer for the industry. So much value was packed into such a small package.
And you are SO right about the viewfinder. I’m just spoiled by our modern cameras. But, no, Leica didn’t have that info in the viewfinder either. Very good point!
Thanks again for watching. I’m glad I could do the camera justice.
My last acquisition in the OM system was a reworked M-1 that an Ebay seller was sourcing here in the US. The price (at the time) was about $245 which considering the work done on it didn't seem too bad to me. They did not modify the viewfinder info so as you say, the workflow is a bit "jerky" but the mechanical action of that camera, both the wind on and the shutter release and actuation is about the smoothest and finest I have ever experienced (I own a lot of Nikon, some Canon, Minolta, and Leica R, etc.). Even though a bit annoying, I overlook it because of the other benefits. Of course the OM-2n has moor info in the viewfinder and the OM-4T has even more, but it is still not quite the same feel as the M-1, at least for me. Thanks for another great video. I am going to have to break out some of the film gear and start burning some film!
Nothing like the feel of a smooth winder! I think the first time I was ever impressed with the operation of a film winding lever was a Nikon FE. Previously, I just thought they were all about the same. But that camera changed my mind.
Even though I now use an Olympus E-M1 Mk II and an E-M1 Mk III, I still have my OM-1N and OM-4T. I even used my OM-4T last year, when my two digital cameras were on loan to my oldest daughter and oldest granddaughter for the weekend. I love the operation, handling, and simplicity of the OM-4T, but overall I prefer digital.
I hope to try a nice OM-4 (T or standard version) at some point. I owned one for about 1 hr recently - until I discovered the auto-exposure was inop. It was nice!
My om1n needs a service, it's capping at 1/1000th. I loved it enough to pick up an OM4Ti too. The meter in the 4 is absolutely cracking, but the film wind doesn't quite fill me with the same joy (mine "rings" a bit after firing too), and it is just a shade bigger.
The real selling point for me is the lenses. I have the kit 50mm f/1.8, as well as the 28mm and 100mm (both f/2.8). I have a couple of others, but those 3 are my "perfect kit". All the lenses having the same filter thread was just mind blowing after coming from an mft setup where every lens had something different.
Those lenses are great, aren’t they? Of all the systems I own, I have the least lenses for the OM. I’d love to have an actual Zuiko 28mm, instead of the Tamron version. Maybe one day. That 100mm sounds nice, though. For several years I used a Zuiko 50 1.4 for a good bit of video work. Having that aperture ring at the front made it work well. I had my hands on a OM-4 a couple of months ago, but had to return it because it wasn’t working in auto mode. It’s a shame because it was really a good price. Still on the lookout though!
@@vintagecameradigest I got the 100 after having the 135 for a while and finding it a little too long. The 100 is tiny, has reasonably close focus, and is really fast for the size. It's my favourite lens!
I used to think my perfect “kit” was a 50, a 28 and a 135. But nowadays I’m inclined to agree with you about the 135 being a bit long. I have a 100 2.8 Canon FD lens, and I do think I prefer that focal length.
What I really love about this camera is the design and the size, unfortunately I never felt attracted to the speed and shutter control on the lens and for me it's important too see your settings in the viewfinder, not something I could get used to easily
The size is certainly unique for the time. But I’m kinda like you on this. Camera size has never been the deciding factor for me. I would absolutely pick a Nikon F or F2 over the OM-1 any day. The shutter control is interesting but really slows me down in actual shooting. I have a friend who spent years as a photojournalist using these Olympus cameras. I don’t know how he did it. I think the OM-4 did finally incorporate full info in the viewfinder, but why save that for the flagship model when plenty of entry-level SLRs had been providing, at least, partial info for years?
좋은 리뷰 잘 봤습니다. OM-1이 작다고는 들었는데, 니콘이나 캐논과 비교하니 깜짝 놀랄 정도로 작네요. Tri-x로 촬영한 사진도 좋습니다👍
It’s very small and light weight compared to those other two cameras. I was surprised too. Thank you for the kind words! And thanks for watching!
As always, an awesomely thorough review. Not like those people who are fully qualified to review after shooting an entire roll (!) through a camera. I used one many years ago and learned several new points from this.
However, a bone to pick. You compare it for size/weight to the Canon F-1 and the Nikon. Both of those were professional cameras with expected lifetimes of >100,000 shutter actuations. I still shoot my Canon F-1n bought new circa 1984 and its beginning to brass on the edges; it has so many options/features the OM-1 lacks, such as a top speed of 1/2000th, five viewfinders, many screens, backs, higher speed motor drive, etc. Wouldn't be fairer to compare the OM-1 to perhaps the Pentax MX, both well designed amateur cameras, nice but not professional?
Thanks, as always! So, to your point - the comparisons to the Canon F-1 and Nikon F are just meant to show what the competitors were doing at the time the OM-1 hit the market. The biggest difference being the size. The Pentax MX probably would be a more apples to apples comparison, but it debuted later (and probably was a direct result of the size of the OM). If we do compare the MX to the OM, the Pentax wins in my book because it had a full info viewfinder. If we compare the overall build quality of the OM vs the two “F’s”, yeah, I think the OM loses again.
I have an unusual question about the Olympus M-1 - the original Olympus film SLR.
I always wanted to get an original Olympus M-1, made before Leica forced Olympus to change the name to OM . I am considering one now, however, the serial number on it is 2xx,xxx. I thought that Olympus started the production of M-1 with 100,000 and only made about 52,000 before switching the name to OM-1. I also heard that there are a number of fakes with M-1 top plate fitted on OM-1.
Does anyone know the serial number range for the original Olympus M-1 film SLR?
Thank you
I don’t know the answer, unfortunately, but maybe someone else on here can shed some light?
Do you have Nikon FM or Pentax MX by any chance? It would be interesting to compare all 3 based on the information in the viewfinder and ergonomics in general.
And, yeah, as many have already noticed, your channel stands out for its excellent production quality from the very first video! It’s a pleasure to watch
Many thanks! I do have a Nikon FM and used to have a Pentax MX. I think Pentax was the first one to respond/react to the Olympus design. And the MX, as well as the Nikon FM, have both exposure values visible in the viewfinder. I do still have a Pentax ME Super, which is even a bit smaller than the MX.
@ 14:40 you asked what the item you were shooting was. It appears to be the belt drive wheel and crankshaft from a steam engine...
That’s great to finally know…many thanks!
I would say (as with many things we utilise) that familiarity with those initially irksome controls is just that, a temporary inconvenience. I bought my first OM-1 back in the eighties, & I still have that original; mine is coupled up with a 55mm F 1.2. Your assertion that the viewfinder is unparalleled, cannot be contradicted; it's so versatile, lightweight, & affords incredible optical diversity. Alongside my Nikon FM (where you do indeed have all the information within the viewfinder), they are my go-to analogue bodies - an honourable mention should go to my Pentax MX too. Excellent overview - thank you !
Yes, I’ve come to agree with the familiarity concept for certain. When I said I’d been “spoiled” by the everything-in-the-viewfinder SLRs it meant just that. And being “spoiled” isn’t really a good thing, to be honest. In the case of the OMs, I can see there becomes an even more tangible connected-ness with the mechanics of the camera. Using “feel” alone to identify a set shutter-speed gives testament to the adage that the camera does become an extension of the photographer in a very real sense.
As a student (a lifetime ago), I took a job as a Photographer's Assistant; the money was rubbish, but what I learned in those holidays away from college, proved invaluable. It may be merely my perception, but many users of digital cameras seem to skip over many of the basics - & to that end, I see in their work, a laziness. The aforementioned "familiarity" is all but disappeared. It is my contention that any, one individual who is contemplating either a career (or hobby) in the discipline, begin with an analogue unit. In my humble opinion, that is the keystone - & certainly, all the photographers I admire, be they from the past or present, have a grounding in that fundamental knowledge - Irrespective of camera control placement.
Wishing you a pleasant day ahead !
Best,
Andrew
I tend to agree with that sentiment. With analogue we really have to trust the process and have confidence in our ability to recognize potential problems before hand. Digital takes us straight to the results where problems can be obvious. And based on those we can modify the approach. But analogue requires us to think through the process before we shoot. And that requires a level of understanding the basic photographic concepts. With digital photography I’m more reactive. With film, definitely proactive. Cheers!
Eloquently put, Sir. Greetings from across the pond !
Best,
Andrew.
I just received an Olympus OM1-n. But it only has a Macro lens. 55mm 3.5
Can I use that like a regular 50mm.?
Will the photos come out clear like yours.?
I don’t care about the low light and background blur for now. Just starting.
Might sound crazy but I’m seriously considering leaving canon for Olympus. I’m just beginning my journey so I’m still figuring out what I’m comfortable with. Plus I like the fact the newest Om-1 allows me to go out in some pretty bad weather with zero worries. But then there’s canon colors but I could always fix that with simple edits.
I think either system would work well enough once you get used to it. Each will have its benefits and drawbacks. But, I think lens choice might play the largest role in any decisions I’d make.
@@vintagecameradigest thanks for the advice 👍
I own OM1 black, and is awsome camera that i use mostly in film, because huge viewfinder, but is not a perfect camera, i really liked your way to take pictures, is very well organized and quiet, and yours exposures are just perfect, i suscribe.
Thanks so much! As you said, it’s not a perfect camera - but I’d be hard-pressed to apply the label of “perfect” to any of them, really. But that’s what makes each one it’s own unique experience. For the OM series, I’d say that magnificent viewfinder is hard to beat!
@@vintagecameradigest and om4 ti ?
The ultimate OM!!
Great video and images! May I ask how you digitized them? (e.g. V600, DSLR, etc.). Thank you!
Thank you! These were digitized with a Canon DSLR set up and a Micro-Nikkor 55mm 2.8 Ai-S lens with extension tubes. Thanks for watching!
With that said, the Nikon F4S from 1988 would be a behemoth then. I don’t understand why they had produced such a camera while knowing that the successfully design of the OM-1 had already taken a revolutionary changes in the 35mm market?! 😮
The F4s is indeed a behemoth. It’s probably twice the size and weight of the OM. And you could easily drive nails with the Nikon. Not so much with the Olympus. Nikon knew their bread and butter was working pros who tended to have their gear in rough and tumble places. And the F-series cameras could handle it. But I think Olympus produced such a small and light camera to be an option for pros who didn’t need that over the top build quality. It had its own niche.
I’m actually studying more on the picture composition side in your videos more than anything else. LOL 😆
You have a great eye 👁️ behind the curtain. I’m sensitive about picture composition in terms of The Golden Ratio (not The Rule Of Thirds) and Fibonacci Spiral. And the use of positive space and negative space.
Don’t study them too hard…you’ll see the flaws, lol!
Really enjoying the information you provide on vintage gear. I always thought the OM1 & OM2 cameras were some of the most aesthetically attractive and quality-built cameras of the day. However, not having exposure data visible in the view finder might just be a deal breaker for me! I can see how annoying it is just by watching you using the camera. Do you know if they, by chance, added it to the OM2?
Well, they “sort of” added it to the OM-2. In aperture-priority mode, you’ll see the auto-selected shutter speed in the viewfinder. But once you switch to manual mode, that info disappears and is replaced by the same match-needle set as in the OM-1. It’s crazy. These are physical (not LED) transparent overlays that move in and out of the viewfinder based on the mode. It seems to me that making that work would be more difficult than just keeping it in there to use in manual mode. But, I guess not. The OM-3 and OM-4 finally did include some info in the finder.
Depending on the equipment that was available 50 years ago I would say that it was probably more efficient for the time.
Probably some truth to that…And I tend to believe that the biggest selling point was that viewfinder. Big, bright and unmatched by any others of the time - and many that came afterwards. It would have been a shame to clutter it with too much info.
The Olympus OM-1 is (was) a very nice camera, but be aware that the fast shutter speeds can be too slow and you will get overexposed images. I will recommend using the OM-2 or OM2 SP which have electronic shutter.
A great bit of advice - thanks! Do you think this is mostly due to age? Or was this an issue from the start?
@@vintagecameradigest It was an issue from the start
The OM-1, OM-2 and OM-2 SP all have the same maximum shutter speed of 1/1000 of a second. Are you saying that your OM-1 wasn’t firing at a true 1/1000?
@@charliepragnell5791 The OM-1 has a mechanical controlled shutter which can be slow at fast shutter speeds, the OM-2 and OM-2 SP have electronic controlled shutter which do not have the problem. If you used negative film you would maybe not notice it, but I you used positive (slide) film you could see those was overexposed when using fast shutter speeds on the OM-1.
You don't have to keep pulling your eye away from the viewfinder because of lack of info. Just SET either speed or f stop, put your hand on f stop or speed and watch the needle.
Yes, I think that could work for a lot of situations.
I agree, the OM1 has too many minuses to make it a positive user. The optics are glorious, however. My Canon A-1 gave me an uncluttered viewfinder with a handy digital display of shutter and aperture, that can be turned off! Yup, I'm a Canon enthusiast!
The size of it is really the main selling point, I think. I have an OM-2n to feature at some point that, at least, does give me a bit more info in the finder - as long as I’m in auto mode. But once you switch back to manual, it all disappears again. 😑
What battery do you use? Also I’ve heard that the battery to replace the Hg battery affects the meter bc of the difference in voltage. Is that your experience? I have an OM1 and meter with a separate light meter
I use the unorthodox method of an off-the-shelf 1.5v. Might not meter precisely, but it’s always been close enough to get negs with good density.
Thanks!
Welcome!
I love my OM-2n 😊
I just found out my OM-2n isn’t working correctly. I was getting ready to do an episode on it. Now I’m only sad. Guess I’ll add it to my “cameras to get repaired” list. Seems like a great camera, though.
Where can we get the battery replacement? Thanks
Well, you can get the replacements on Amazon but they’re kinda pricey. I just usually cheat and use the modern 1.5v batteries. I’ve never noted a significant exposure error as a result.
❤ love the video
Thank you for watching!
I bought one (black version) and the micro prism is giving me tough time focusing as my eye sight is not as good as it used to be. Any tips for focusing?
I understand that completely! I’d check eBay for one of the following: screen 1-3 (split image only), screen 1-13 (split image + microprism) or screen 1-14 (diagonal split image + microprism). The prices seem pretty reasonable at the moment.
Hola¡ me gustaría preguntarte, estoy aprendiendo apenas fotografía, y tengo exactamente esta Olympus OM-1n, tengo un problema, la batería, ya que se que no las hacen más y me ha costado conseguir alguna otra opción.
Es posible utilizarla sin batería y usar un fotómetro? Que me puedes recomendar. Gracias
I am happy that you are learning photography with a great camera! Yes, the battery is obsolete. But since it is only needed to power the meter, you can easily do without it by using one of the light meter apps on your phone. Or, as you said, an external light meter will also do fine. There are “new” replacement batteries available, but they are a bit expensive. Another option is to use a modern alkaline battery. The metering won’t be perfect but it does get close in many situations. This isn’t the best method, but it won’t damage the camera, and I’ve done it many times myself. Thanks for the question! Let me know if you have any others. I’m happy to help!
@@vintagecameradigest Muchas gracias por la respuesta y la información, me emociona empezar, ya descargue una aplicacion en el teléfono y vamos a ver como me va. Gracias
Good luck and have fun!
I have the M-1 and OM-1. You've pretty well summed it up. We have to view this camera as a compromise, at 52 years old it was the world's smallest 35mm full frame SLR. The M-1 came out in 1971 in Japan only and only 5000 were produced and it was withdrawn due to the Leitz copyright of the model name. The Pentax ME Super was a tiny bit smaller but had no shutter speed dial. And it came out four years later. The main issue was the prism old glue breakdown which contaminated the viewfinder but I had the M-1 prism replaced with an OM-40 prism and it is once again a beautiful viewfinder. There are ways of memorising which shutter speed you have selected by just keeping tabs on where you have gone from the original setting, and as for the aperture, the D.O.F. preview button gives you a visual of your focal range, so the F number is kind of irrelevant. I also purchased an Olympus Pen F half frame camera and a Pen F to OM lens mount adaptor so I can use my six OM/M System lenses on the tiny Pen F SLR. Both designed by Maitani, what a legend he was, R.I.P.
From what I’ve heard from other commenters, you’d be correct. Longtime users developed their own memorization methods to keep track of settings. And if one is familiar enough with fundamental concepts of exposure, it would be a good system for sure.
That’s very interesting about the OM-Pen adapter. Didn’t know such magic existed. Very cool!
The Minolta XD-7 (XD-11 in the US) would answer most of your design concerns about the OM-1, It has aperture AND shutter speed info in the finder, a compact design with all the good features including DOF preview, mechanical self timer and three fully metered exposure modes. Electronic shutter speeds with one mechanical speed at, I think, 1/90th sec.@@vintagecameradigest
@@DominicRulikowski oh yes! The Minolta XD11 (US name) covered it all. A fine camera by any measure. I think it was one of the firsts (if not THE first) to offer both shutter and aperture-priority modes.
I love the camera and appreciate the video, thank you. Nikon can also be pronouced as "neekon" ou "ニコン" as we say in Japan. All the best!
Thanks for watching! And thanks for confirming the actual pronunciation. In this part of the US I’ve never heard anything other than NY-kon. So, it’s good to get the info straight from the home country! Thanks!
Use it at your discretion since, to be fair, the way "Olympus" (which, unlike Nikon, it's a Japanese brand with a western name) is pronounced in Japan is atrocious. 👍
Now that’s funny! 😆
Thank you
You're welcome
Bought mine in 2012 at second hand store for 250 euros. I still use it till this day, even more than my expensive leica m6 that i also bought at second hand store for 2000 euros😅😂 i take my om-1 everywhere with me for 12 years now. It's my first and favorite film camera.
It does travel well! Doesn’t require a lot of room. I took mine on holiday a few years ago, and it was quite effortless to carry around. Plus it’s darn good camera!
@@vintagecameradigestagree! I like the compact size of this camera. I’m more in a favor of small cameras haha I’ve had a period of time where I used lot of point and shoot cameras just because of its size. The OM-1 is just perfect and the viewfinder is amazing. The shutter speed and aperture settings on the lens were indeed a little tricky at first but I got used to it. I sometimes use an light meter app to meter, but since I’m so used to it by now, I do it by eye and feel.
@@vintagecameradigest btw I have a quick question: I recently bought a new Zuiko 35mm f2.8 lens of the market place. I noticed the aperture ring is “kinda” loose like, it makes slight rattling noise even though it works perfectly fine and clicks perfectly when setting the aperture. It’s just a annoyance but I was wondering if you have some advice for me to fix it. Excuse me for my OCD haha!🫣😜 apparently it’s normal behavior but if it can be fixed, I would love to know!
No, I get it. Stuff like that bugs me, too. I’ve never ventured into tearing down an OM Zuiko lens, though. So, I don’t have any clue what the cause might be. In other lenses, that might be a symptom of a missing or out of place ball bearing or pin that clicks the aperture into place. I’m not sure if the Zuiko lenses use bearings or another method for the detents. But if it is a bearing, one possibility is that it could have been repaired at some point and reassembled with the wrong size bearing. Those bearings are incredibly easy to lose when tearing down a lens. And could be that the repairer replaced it with whatever was on hand. Again, this is only my speculation. I actually have a junk 35 Zuiko around here somewhere. If I can find it, I’ll dig into it a little and see if the bearing theory is plausible.
@@vintagecameradigest thanks for the feedback. But yeah, that was my thoughts as well, even though it looks like it’s the right bearing, it’s not oversized or whatever. It’s just loose, like I can even slightly wobble it up and down and you can hear it very clear. Even when taking pictures, you accidentally touched the aperture ring😅 I wouldn’t say it’s the end of the world, and it doesn’t affect the pictures though, they look amazing and everything works fine when it comes to the aperture. It’s just the annoyances of it haha. I never encountered these issues so it’s a first. But I will look up to it. Let me know if one of your 35’s has this issue.
th-cam.com/video/F5f_0Vx9_bo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=hHfuIIsjEQh3zTiP
somebody can please indicate accurately and tested which battery is actually good for this camera nowdays???
i put one lr44 with the adaptor mr09 but seems like the exposimeter is always underexposed.
for example where other camera says the right exposure is at ss250 f1.4 iso 400, my om1 says that that exposure would be correct with ss60 f1.4 iso400
why is that? is my exposimeter not working well?
thanks
Thank you for the excellent question. I happen to have one of the Wein 1.35v replacement batteries on hand AND a modern PX625A 1.5v. I just tested both on a Kodak gray card in low light and outdoors. For indoors, the 1.35v battery gave me a reading of 1/15 at f/3.5 at ISO400. The modern PX625A gave me a reading of 1/15 at f/4 at ISO400. In the outdoor setting, I got 1/250 at f/6.7 at ISO400 with the 1.35v battery. With the 1.5v battery (PX25A) I got a reading of 1/250 at f/8 at ISO400. I tested in both lighting scenarios to see if the difference was linear. In other words, was the difference the same in the low light situation as the bright light situation. This simple test seemed to confirm it is. So , it would suggest for the most accurate metering with a modern 1.5v battery, to set the ISO about 1/3 stop less than the actual film speed (since 1/2 stops on the ISO dial are not possible). So, with 400 speed film, set the ISO to 320 when using a modern 1.5v battery (PX625A). Now, I do not have the MR09 battery adaptor for the LR44 to compare. But, theoretically, it should give the same result as the PX625A.
I’d be happy to hear from any others who have any experience with this.
By the way, your original question seemed to state that instead of being underexposed, the OM-1 is showing a 2-stop OVERexposure (1/60 v 1/250 on the other camera). If this is indeed the case with the LR44 + Adapter in the OM-1, it would indicate a degree of meter inaccuracy.
What we would normally expect using a battery with a higher output voltage would indeed be an underexposure. And this seems to track with the test I just ran with the comparison.
Let me chime in again since I think I only half-way answered your question. And this deals with the specifics of the MR09 adapter. A genuine MR09 should convert the shape of the battery as well as change the voltage to 1.35v. Hence the higher price tags. Kanto camera seems to be a popular brand that does this. Cheaper MR09 adapters my not really convert the voltage, only the shape. In any case, what I’ve learned is that a genuine MR09 requires a 10k ohm or lower resistance to work as it should. And that the Olympus OM-1 has a higher load resistance than the 10k. So, that battery adapter doesn’t function properly in the OM-1.
You do eventually get used to what the aperture and shutter speed are set to based on feel. I hate cluttered viewfinders.
Yes, that seems to be the general consensus. Once you’re used to it, it’s a breeze.
To me there is no real use for 35mm film camera anymore. There is no use case, where digital can't do practically everything better and much, much cheaper than 35mm film can. Consequently, I only shoot analog medium and large format nowadays. However, my OM-1 is one of the few 35mm cameras I've kept, for the rare occasion I might shoot 35mm. To me, besides the Leica R6 (which I also kept one of), the OM-1 is the best 35mm camera ever made, and a huge part of that are the Zuiko lenses, which are totally at par and sometimes even better than the Leica lenses.
Shooting with the OM-1, because of its outstanding viewfinder, does not require checking aperture and shutter speeds all the time. Just look through your viewfinder and compose your picture with the intended depth of field and simply select the shutter speed to bring the needle to the middle. With a little experience, you will know if you need to hold the camera particularly steady or not, because you selected a large depth of field. I don't need to know that what I took the picture with is 125th with f 8 or a 60th with f 11. I need to know that the picture looks fine in the viewfinder - and there are no other viewfinder which allows better to do just that.
What you say is certainly in agreement with the other OM-1 users I’ve heard from. The lack of viewfinder info is certainly not a handicap. Many thanks for the comment!
The modern 2024 "OM1 ii" cannot gain the prestige of this heritage film version
The new one is interesting, but the original excels at simplicity.
Do you develop your own b+w at home? What are your preferred chemicals?
Thanks for the question. Yes, I do develop my b+w myself. My go-to for many many years has been D-76 at a 1:1 dilution. I probably should try others more often, though. There are plenty of good ones out there.
@@vintagecameradigest nah! That’s a good one - same one I started using after they quit make HC110
Have they actually announced that HC-110 is gone? I mean by all appearances it is since no one seems to have it.
Nikon F4 series cameras didn’t have a good autofocus system anyway (slow) until the F5 and F100.
Yeah, Nikon was doing what it could to not alienate its base of longtime pro users. So sticking to the same F-mount as on it’s F series cameras before was a necessity for them. And their AF system suffered a bit because of it. Canon, on the other hand, said to heck with that and developed the all NEW EF-mount. Which was probably a good business decision. It took Nikon a while to catch up.
@@vintagecameradigest I think Canon’s USM or Ultrasonic motor, lens driven technology is far quieter and faster (less power consumption to the batteries) than the body driven ones like the Nikon’s as you had pointed out the reason why they kept the F mount since 1959. No wonder Canon dared to take a big gambling to or against its competitors.
Yes, Canon did well with putting the motors in the lenses. So many of its competitors were using in-body motors. But most of them eventually came around and saw that was the way to go.
THIS MY FIRST CAMERA
It's a classic! And what a nice camera to start out with!
@@vintagecameradigest Do you think I can do it? It's just that I'm at a point in my life where I don't have much time for photography, so maybe I should sell it and buy a lighter digicam. So as not to ruin such a good camera.
@@vintagecameradigest Say I've looked at it reviews and looked into it myself and focusing is certainly very difficult to do
Manual focusing is certainly different than what our modern cameras offer. So, it’s a bit of a skill, but I think it’s easily learnable. And this camera has one of the biggest and brightest viewfinder images ever. So that all works in your favor. But, if you think it just doesn’t work for you, I see no reason not to trade it for a newer camera. No camera should get in the way of your enjoyment of photography. So, whatever it takes to get joy out of photography I will endorse whole-heartedly.
Personally, I use a Canon F-1n and a Yashica Mat-124G 😂
I have an OLD F-1 that is a joy to use. And I have a Yashica 124G that I’ll be doing an episode on before too long. I’ll be using the Tele and Wide auxiliary lenses on it, too. Always good to check out the accessories. Or is that just my excuse to by more gear??😆
@@vintagecameradigest Yes, I have both, the F-1n (1976) and the New F-1 (1981). I agree the old one is a lot more fun to use due to its pure mechanical shutter design and less dealing with any electronic issues may have due to the age. But the T90 is real deal for work specially In photojournalism in a fast paced world these days. Luckily, I had bought the last one NOS from a closing camera store years ago. I actually like using it more than any Nikon’s flagship models if I’m not using the F-1n. I’m now only keeping an F2 and an F5 as paperweights. I still prefer manual focusing on my work (zone focus). I just don’t like camera decides where to focus for me in Street Photography. haha 😆
I can definitely see how autofocus would be a nightmare with street photography. Zone focus is the way to go.
I love my OM1, actually all my Olympus cameras (1,2,4 in various versions) so much so that I want to have babies with them! I had my first OM1 back in 1974 from my first pay packet
Now that sounds like someone who REALLY loves Olympus :-) I have to admit that they do set themselves apart from other systems. The OM-4 is very nice.
You are fortunate in being able to afford to take so many shots of one subject most of us make do with one shot on film, you failed to mention the interchangeable focusing screens and the big problem for someone thinking of buying one a foam damaged prism, the 1.3v battery replacement is not quite so straightforward as you make out
Thanks for pointing out the issue with the foam/prism. It’s not an issue I’ve experienced, so good info to know. As for the battery, I’ve only used modern 1.5v cells for this camera. I admit it’s unorthodox and will affect the accuracy of the meter to some degree. But I’ve never experienced significant exposure problems because of it.
Thank you for your reply, when I had mine serviced they re-calibrated the meter to read correctly with a 1.5 battery the prism in mine is in good condition they said before prices started to increase they used to buy OM 10's just for the prism. I have added a link to a video you might like th-cam.com/video/V5ulyCj4Bew/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NsQSjxeQLLSg_kqX
Good to know it can actually be re-calibrated to work correctly with modern batteries. My guess would be that this is an adjustment that’s not commonly available for cameras with similar battery issues. I’m going to look into this more since now I’m intrigued. And thanks for the video link. I have watched several of his videos before, but not this one. Cheers!