The invisible motion of still objects - Ran Tivony

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 258

  • @011azr
    @011azr 8 ปีที่แล้ว +432

    Whoa! My body is constantly moving. Another great excuse for not going to the gym!

    • @hacker-7214
      @hacker-7214 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +011azr nice one

    • @thekingmeruem
      @thekingmeruem 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +011azr what??

    • @kyledolor5257
      @kyledolor5257 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +011azr This is micro, not macro. But I get the sarcasm.

    • @GarketMardener
      @GarketMardener 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +011azr HEHEHHEE

    • @thalespro9995
      @thalespro9995 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Everyone is replying to +011 but he/she hasn’t written any comments here wth

  • @XenogeneGray
    @XenogeneGray 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Awesome lesson - as a science teacher I really appreciate this type of great work :)

  • @anaghadusane6757
    @anaghadusane6757 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The animated molecules are so cute and it just cleared my concepts 😀😀

  • @bakewithela8327
    @bakewithela8327 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you TED Ed. This is one of the best.

  • @yuranival
    @yuranival 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Cool! Keep these videos coming! They're pretty interesting and simply put.

  • @zyro9922
    @zyro9922 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow. Amazing explanation. Degree of freedom, greenhouse effect, microwave , motion at absolute 0. Learned a lot. Thanks

  • @kukaweber8301
    @kukaweber8301 8 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Damn this will help me A LOT!!!!! Thanks!!

    • @islezeus
      @islezeus 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kuka Weber was that sarcasm?

    • @kukaweber8301
      @kukaweber8301 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +islezeus nope I wrote a test about it

    • @islezeus
      @islezeus 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kuka Weber relax honey, my comments have been tongue in cheek

    • @kukaweber8301
      @kukaweber8301 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +islezeus ahhh pinto grande preto!

    • @islezeus
      @islezeus 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kuka Weber obrigado, menina

  • @아야어여-j3w
    @아야어여-j3w 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is so useful information. I appreciate your effort to explain the molecular motion

  • @ChetanSharma-mc5kr
    @ChetanSharma-mc5kr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video reminded me the concepts, I was taught in thermodynamics, and rotational and vibrational spectroscopy in quantum mechanics.

  • @physioweng
    @physioweng 8 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    He likes to move it move it, she likes to move it move it, we like move move it, we like to MOVE IT!

  • @theatifaks
    @theatifaks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Kudos to the animation team. Brilliant stuff.

  • @Lixgrib
    @Lixgrib 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video! Except that the last statement is incorrect about -273C. As predicted by Bose & Einstein, and demonstrated since 1995, we end up with a new state of matter once you hit -273 and remove all the motion. That is the BEC state of matter, or a Bose-Einstein Condensate. Molecules are no longer distinguishable at that temperature.

  • @kvlpnd
    @kvlpnd 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Amazing.... I learned this in 12th std chemistry but whoaaa... it just seems so simple now....

  • @scroopynoopers2892
    @scroopynoopers2892 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was pondering this the other day and now this video gets uploaded, thank you!

  • @GianlucaAiello
    @GianlucaAiello 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thinking about infinite give me chills every time.

  • @kirambers3255
    @kirambers3255 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Do more riddles!!!!!

  • @djayjp
    @djayjp 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A lot of people mistakenly believe that infrared radiation= heat. While it often results in heat, or is a good indicator of such, it is not itself heat. This should help clear it up!

    • @skyr8449
      @skyr8449 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +djayjp I have never heard that once in my life just link whoever thinks that a wiki page or two about those topics xD

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lord lima bean For instance someone might say "thermal vision" instead of infrared vision. But yeah ha

  • @robertma6068
    @robertma6068 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who knew molecules could be so cute >.< I love when one of them is dancing to the boom box towards the end.

  • @truetwinflameandspirituala8211
    @truetwinflameandspirituala8211 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect video that answered all my questions and then some. Thank you!

  • @feelingzhakkaas
    @feelingzhakkaas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent.
    Do you have video on zero.point energy?

  • @EugeneParallax
    @EugeneParallax 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    One can argue, that movement is what defines the matter/energy as a whole, and the Universe is but a contrast between energy, that always moves, and space, that never does.

  • @ellageorge1085
    @ellageorge1085 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very helpful for our 1st year thermodynamics chapter

  • @SuryaSarav_
    @SuryaSarav_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Piece of art!

  • @riyagandhi7312
    @riyagandhi7312 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great Video!

  • @johnnychang4233
    @johnnychang4233 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Is possible for complex molecules to move in like 4D fashion like in an hypercube? Say certain aromatic compounds with the benzene structures?

    • @tyab87
      @tyab87 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +johnny chang With string theory, perhaps. I know for a fact some vibration modes don't actually happen because the amount of energy changed in bringing some atoms closer or farther together wouldn't be quantified, so maybe that energy translates to movement in one of the 11 dimensions described by string theory? I have no idea :D

  • @decidedtime8610
    @decidedtime8610 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice. Joined now 16-02-2024

  • @CosmoJ_1111
    @CosmoJ_1111 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For the last couple of months inanimate objects move. Pictures look alive…decorative flower arrangement, the petals or stems move around. I almost feel crazy, but I find it fascinating. I don’t know what’s going on lol. Even my blanket, if I stare at it, it’ll start moving as if there’s something in it.
    I even have a 6” ceramic Gnome that was my dad’s…this thing dances. I’m losing it haha

  • @superuser777
    @superuser777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those atoms are so damn cute! 😫😩 I just loved the vid and I'd give it 5 stars for the atoms and 5 stars from my side for explanation! Just loved the video! ❤️

  • @daniloarturobarretoyaya7304
    @daniloarturobarretoyaya7304 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extraordinary great explanation

  • @AcidBiscuits
    @AcidBiscuits 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love how Richard Feynman describes "jiggling" of everything.

  • @PresleyS1012
    @PresleyS1012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do modes of vibration have anything to do with acoustic levitation? Do vibrating sound waves affect different molecules in different ways?

  • @mohammedalmdr4209
    @mohammedalmdr4209 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredibly useful

  • @OtodidakwithKangAdit
    @OtodidakwithKangAdit 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gee.. This is very clear explanation.. Thanks

  • @jawaharg92
    @jawaharg92 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow It is amazing! What a great Explanation.... Thank you Very Much...

  • @AhmedX177
    @AhmedX177 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing!!!! Quick question, What about the moment when a molecule is freed/released/migrate from the current structure to let's say another matrix like for instance the migration of some compounds or elements like lead to the food its containing from the packaging material? The migrated element or compound was done because it was loosely bound or due to being in an amorphous area while crystalline needs more time/temperature?

  • @chasm6091
    @chasm6091 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great animation!

  • @kevito111
    @kevito111 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I need know, what is the practical application of this knowledge?, please

  • @sebatsituab3955
    @sebatsituab3955 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Useful Channel for Stuff!

  • @marcos1292
    @marcos1292 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    thanks ted x . for animaton

  • @Descalabrox
    @Descalabrox 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did we discover what the angle of the atoms towards each other is? That would be a great topic for a future video :)

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Descalabrox
      as a rule of thumb: VSEPR-model,
      the exact value can be calculated theoretically and measured/deducted from the resulting IR spectra.

  • @benjaminfox6206
    @benjaminfox6206 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I wish you had gone into more detail about zero point energy. Think of the tachyons…

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      no tachyons do not exist. Imaginary mass particles do not exist, even though they are a result of the erroneous bosonic string theory and the emission of Cherenkov radiation. Modelling by Lorentz invariance in the Standard Model, it is extremely unlikely that these superluminal particles exist. The problem with tachyonic condensation is also described in detail in the low-energy Yang-Mills description of a multiple D-Brane quantum system.

  • @Pizaerable
    @Pizaerable 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ahhhh. It's amazing how simple atoms make complex machines and biological system.

    • @derekrodrigues6890
      @derekrodrigues6890 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      larger and larger collections of simple things interacting via simple and predictable rules increases in the complexity of and information contained in the system and that's what people are. A complex physical system. It is amazing, but most people don't understand it and fall for the illusion that we have an immaterial soul that acts and decides independently from the physical universe around us

    • @Pizaerable
      @Pizaerable 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Derek Rodrigues
      Well, people who believe in immaterial soul and etc don't have the brain capacity to understand the world around them. They believe they need to worship a higher power. But in the matter of fact, we humans should understand what is around us, and hopefully soon be able to enjoy our short sharp of existence.

    • @andrewbutler4822
      @andrewbutler4822 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Pizaerable
      It's not that they don't have the brain capacity, it is statistics. Most people never understand the mechanism of self, nor the mechanisms of the universe, but that isn't necessary their fault. For the individual has to seek these things, but there are so many distractions in our way to see it. It is sad really, but this is just part of the human condition. Once a human truly sees, he/she is no longer animal-man, but man-animal.
      This is minimal amount of info on these topics, however I am always open to discussion.

  • @kenbobca
    @kenbobca 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thank you.

  • @houloudini
    @houloudini 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    First thought is what happens at the quantum level when observation happens. When does movement stop within the quantum realm? Am i misinterpreting how the quantum realm works? Was that the answer at the end?

  • @Janseli24
    @Janseli24 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Ted-Ed,
    MORE S.T.E.M. PLEASE!!

  • @Nick2014B
    @Nick2014B 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So at room temp translation motion has highest contribution, but at high temps since the molecules are taking so much heat in do they contribute more than translational or no?

  • @BrownFireWood
    @BrownFireWood 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a question, say you had a numerical ticker, that goes up 300,000 ticks per second. It's just that the ticks are numbers it's like a digital clock that goes the speed of light. now if the numbers were changing ( increasing 300,000 digits per second ) would you be able to see the the numbers or would it just be, depending on the color of the numbers, a red blur or would you not see anything because light photons would never reach you because they're changing (digitally) faster then light.

    • @moontiger6393
      @moontiger6393 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +BrownFire Wood The clock is not going faster than the speed of light as speed is distance per time not ticks per time. It would be theoretically be possible to make a camera that can record the clock as it changes as 1/300,000 of a second isn't the plank time, the smallest unit of time in the universe, that could then be slowed down to show the clock as it changes. The reason that it would reach you is that while it changes almost instantly (relative to human perception) if it actually did flash a number every 1/300,000 of second then light (which can be detected) would have to be emitted. However, an interesting consequence of it flashing so fast is that since the number changes after light from it has come out of it by a meter (how far light goes in 1/300,000 of a second) the number you record will be the amount of meters you're away rounded down less than the actual time it displays.

  • @abdelrhmanmahmoud6187
    @abdelrhmanmahmoud6187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video

  • @_next223
    @_next223 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish they would re-release this and remove the ending where death is certain for us all eventually. "Long after we're gone"

  • @ishanphansalkar6296
    @ishanphansalkar6296 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    When physical qualities of a molecule are given , sometimes even the bond length and bond angle are specified . If the they keep changing, how are they calculated?

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ishan Phansalkar
      average. But the difference is not that much anyhow.

  • @PrivacyKingdoms
    @PrivacyKingdoms 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 3:50, he says that when infrared radiation is emitted by the sun, the water vapor and carbon dioxide molecules absorb this form of energy and then speed up and get warmer. i get that part. but then he says that as a result of getting warmer, they emit their own infrared radiation, which then gets absorbed by the Earth, and the Earth gets warmer. So is he saying that global warming is when the Earth itself gets warmer, and not the atmosphere? Because I always thought that global warming only affected the atmosphere, so I guess I learned something new. Also, why do water vapor and carbon dioxide molecules emit infrared radiation when they heat up?

    • @renaea.8260
      @renaea.8260 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Global warming is both the atmosphere and the earth heating up at the same time; you can't heat one without the other getting warmer. As for radiation, literally everything emits thermal radiation, it's just that most objects don't emit it as visible light. Think of an infrared camera, it shows you things based on temperature because it detects the infrared thermal radiation that all objects give off, not because of reflected visible light like a normal camera. On the other end, have you ever seen red hot or white hot metal? That's a case where the object is so hot, the thermal radiation has shifted higher in energy and is emitted as visible light instead of just infrared.

    • @PrivacyKingdoms
      @PrivacyKingdoms 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ohhhhh. im finally realizing that those thermal maps are showing emitted radiation. thanks!

  • @param4553
    @param4553 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    pls try to make video on absolute zeeo temperature and what happens to matter at that condition.

    • @param4553
      @param4553 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I meab zero*

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +param patel
      Nothing, as this can never happen (3rd law of thermodynamics). It's impossible to get to 0K.

    • @param4553
      @param4553 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frank Schneider thanks

  • @independentthinker7168
    @independentthinker7168 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Weird, this morning i attempted a bowel movement and it didnt move at all!!

  • @VikasVJois
    @VikasVJois 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Much better than my chemistry class

  • @dr.satishsharma9794
    @dr.satishsharma9794 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent... thanks 🙏

  • @meghagupta2315
    @meghagupta2315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing way and even its interesting 👍👍

  • @shreshtha786
    @shreshtha786 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The animation is so adorable....but I couldn't understand the 3n-5 etc..

    • @shreshtha786
      @shreshtha786 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +epic muzik thank u so much:D...but does 3n-6 mean 3 times n minus 6 or equal to 6

  • @shivPrakashPal108
    @shivPrakashPal108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I use sound energy to heat things up

  • @ardalanhayatifar4034
    @ardalanhayatifar4034 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    rotation of linear molecules along their axis is not possible or counted I thought because that no torque or force can be exerted this way. not because that the position of atoms do not change!

    • @ObjectsInMotion
      @ObjectsInMotion 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Those two statements mean the same thing. Torque cannot be applied *because* there is no extent to exert force on, the "r" is effectively zero. Thus there is no angular momentum in that node and thus no change in position along that axis.

  • @piyush_d4501
    @piyush_d4501 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the opposite happens in the refrigerator?

  • @AkshayKumar-yb2xn
    @AkshayKumar-yb2xn 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    this video just gave me the answer to my biggest question!!! wow!

    • @brokenprogram7517
      @brokenprogram7517 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Akshay Kumar
      what is it?

    • @AkshayKumar-yb2xn
      @AkshayKumar-yb2xn 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Broken Program i always wondered how molecules moved (behaved) in extreme conditions...like how they would it be when the environment around them is hot or cold or stuff like that...

  • @muhtasamabdullah8333
    @muhtasamabdullah8333 ปีที่แล้ว

    The high speed of air molecules ain't letting me sleep. When these molecules gonna slow down

  • @lseul8812
    @lseul8812 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video, but there is such a thing as colder then absolute zero first achieved sometime in the early 1950s by the nuclear magnetic resonance experiments of Pound, Purcell, and Ramsey. This leads many scientists to believe that temperature is a loop rather than a linear scale. Possibly next video?

  • @kishoreg426
    @kishoreg426 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does same atoms have dipole moment and vibration!???

  • @meegy2
    @meegy2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    did the universe have a first moment? or was it always here?

  • @uvibe5574
    @uvibe5574 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    " After we're gone " 😭 i felt sad when i heard that, knowing that we only have 3 - 4 years to live in this awesome planet 😢 Lets save the earth before it's too late!

  • @alexanderpushkin9160
    @alexanderpushkin9160 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can elementary particle such as electron have a temperature?

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Alexander Pushkin
      sure. The hotter they get, the faster they move (at least until relativistic effects set in and relativistic mass increases)..

  • @shiddy.
    @shiddy. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    good one

  • @karlomlakic6838
    @karlomlakic6838 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about moving elektrons?

  • @amerikanskispy7842
    @amerikanskispy7842 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just want to say the atoms were so adorable

  • @vanphan9318
    @vanphan9318 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    at the end of this video. say the absolute zero temperature, why is the molecule still moving? . I do not understand the author of this article

    • @househounds-webuyruffhouse4687
      @househounds-webuyruffhouse4687 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because atoms still have to move regardless of their state or environment. It's the universal law of vibration. Universal laws cannot be broken.

  • @nguyenvietdung95
    @nguyenvietdung95 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can I get the video's script ? I cannot find it here

  • @ghiribizzi
    @ghiribizzi 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    the more DOF s the more energy can either absorb or emit and of course this has to do with green house effect and utterly with climate change. Further explanations about angular momentun and black body radiation would complete the understanding about this

  • @aryan-nc4qy
    @aryan-nc4qy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love his voice

  • @柯奕安-l3x
    @柯奕安-l3x 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The zero energy is not equal to 0, not because the vibrate kinetic, but the potential energy.
    So, it's possible that the atoms stop vibrating at 0K.

  • @kimvanoers5504
    @kimvanoers5504 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Asymmetric should be antisymmetric. And yes there is a difference.

  • @mightyoranje
    @mightyoranje 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1:06 PARTY TIMMEEE!

  • @pappusoni5411
    @pappusoni5411 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @cubedude76
    @cubedude76 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    doesn't it only take 2 variables to describe the orientation of an object? think of spherical coordinates. they can point in any direction with just two variables.

    • @EugeneParallax
      @EugeneParallax 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +cubedude76 There's a third variable, that describes the object's rotation around the vector of their orientation.

  • @liviamansano8757
    @liviamansano8757 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    And welcome to the world of vibrational spectroscopy.

  • @amaurypineda1834
    @amaurypineda1834 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Soon we''ll find a way to control those movements and separate matter at will.

  • @Jake-kn3xg
    @Jake-kn3xg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So what moved the first atom?

    • @momchi98
      @momchi98 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Caffa Jake Energy!

    • @Jake-kn3xg
      @Jake-kn3xg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Momchil Momchilov From where?

    • @momchi98
      @momchi98 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Caffa Jake Nobody knows.

    • @Jake-kn3xg
      @Jake-kn3xg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Momchil Momchilov Does it even matter...?
      : )

    • @momchi98
      @momchi98 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Caffa Jake Depends on you. If you want to know, then yes, otherwise no.

  • @AnastasDancha
    @AnastasDancha 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    gotta keep up with the news TED, gas can apparently reach temperature below absolute zero.. which, I suppose, makes it no longer absolute

  • @miguelsosa9877
    @miguelsosa9877 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    sacreblu! great video

  • @XtremeGamesW2013
    @XtremeGamesW2013 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Zero Point Energy? (Incredibles theme plays)

  • @avsminhas8903
    @avsminhas8903 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is we are atoms to another creatures that are way bigger than us and the atoms that we observe are people that are way smaller than us.

    • @Eltodofull
      @Eltodofull 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      atoms don't look like people.
      but what if every subatomic particle is a whole universe?
      :O
      what if we are a life simulation of a fat Sims 1357² player.
      what if you are part of my creation? or I was created by you?

    • @islezeus
      @islezeus 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Avs minhas I thought something like that but I assumed the atoms are minute solar systems (nucleus = sun, electrons = planets) and these solar systems help make up minute galaxies which form greater masses... therefore, on the atom are smaller beings living on them, like we are living on parts of an atom that make up a greater mass together with the rest of the galaxies...

    • @ObjectsInMotion
      @ObjectsInMotion 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +islezeus Except atoms look absolutely nothing like solar systems. Solar systems are flat disks and atoms are spherical.

    • @ObjectsInMotion
      @ObjectsInMotion 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +islezeus Except atoms look absolutely nothing like solar systems. Solar systems are flat disks and atoms are spherical.

  • @galaxyspirals9595
    @galaxyspirals9595 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought this video was about still objects crossing a distance if left alone for a very long time. Like a vase on a table falling off after a thousand years.

  • @kithsakhai
    @kithsakhai 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yay finally a chemistry video!

  • @johnborat3113
    @johnborat3113 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:44 ???? how!?

  • @wasirhuzaifa89
    @wasirhuzaifa89 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    why can't we see it in solid object???

  • @gatobrado
    @gatobrado 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you should hire Jazza from Draw with Jazza for animation

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +gatobrado
      Hi Jazza ... how's business lately ?

    • @gatobrado
      @gatobrado 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Frank Schneider what?
      you think in jazza?
      look at my account activity bro
      nighty night

  • @Truthseeker846
    @Truthseeker846 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the funny and cute cartoon.🙂☺️☺️☺️

  • @JohnDoe-bp1dd
    @JohnDoe-bp1dd 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the smiley atoms are so cute

  • @interstellarbruce6429
    @interstellarbruce6429 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it possible for anything to be completely still is our universe capable of that?

    • @Iarlen
      @Iarlen 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Interstellar bruce Good fucking question, but my answer, as a layman, would be no.

    • @61gopalprabhulsm70
      @61gopalprabhulsm70 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That violates the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

    • @Iarlen
      @Iarlen 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gopal Prabhu In what way?

    • @61gopalprabhulsm70
      @61gopalprabhulsm70 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Erik Jarl Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that one cannot measure the position and momentum of a particle simultaneously. So if a particle is at rest, one could simultaneously be able to figure out it's momentum and position. Now I don't know why it is this way. Ask a physicist.

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Gopal Prabhu
      Actually delta x * delta p > h-bar (what you just described) is just one half of it, the other is delta-E*delta t > h-bar.

  • @pirouettenerd2675
    @pirouettenerd2675 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    What substances are made of... unbound atoms?

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Plissken Armitage
      Stars .. so roughly 99% of the baryonic universe (although within stars the atoms are additionally ionized into plasma).

  • @ricardocesargomes7274
    @ricardocesargomes7274 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Espetacular...😎😎😎

  • @Joel-cl8uz
    @Joel-cl8uz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @kgoodwin486
    @kgoodwin486 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is anything ever really completely still?

  • @witzar
    @witzar 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video makes a great effort to define degrees of freedom of molecules and shows how to calculate it. But there is no single use of this concept in the entire video. A definition is a pointless thing, unless you use it.

    • @renaea.8260
      @renaea.8260 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The application you're looking for is IR and Raman spectroscopy. Degrees of freedom is a pretty important idea in physical chemistry.

    • @witzar
      @witzar 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Renae A. Thanks for pointing that out. I don't doubt that it has applications. I just complain that the video fails to mention them.

  • @illustriouschin
    @illustriouschin 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    the animator must not understand translation because each depiction shown has also included scaling and/or rotation.