Did your Schnellboot use MTU-Diesels with 3600 PS like those used on the Tiger-Class? If so the consumption was around 30 Tons Diesel a Day, and actually its not all that much if you compare with any Cold-War-Era Tank, most of those consume a half ton Diesel every 100 km.
We changed out a main engine LM2500 on a Destroyer. They took the top of the stack off and it came right out on a set of rails. Pretty impressive stuff.
Reminds me of the Brave class the Royal Navy had in the sixties. Our school was on a hill overlooking the local harbour and we 'd watch them coming out of the harbour at four knots when they were clear of the harbour multi they would open them up and disappear into the distance. I think there were three Brave Bordered, Brave Cutlass and I can 't remember the third. Too noisy to creep up on anything but they didn't need to they could outrun just about anything.
Hence the reason so many old piston engined aircraft which are still useful (because they are so well suited to the job they do) have been converted to the most used small turboprop, the PT-6.
🚫 No, no, their naval missile boat waterskiing team does NOT ski directly behind the boat! Actually, there are two, 18.5 meter long, carbon fibre booms which are extended out from either side of the boat, with an attachment point every 1.6m for all the tow lines. When performing their competitive waterskiing dance routine, there are 20 ski-dancers at once! 😉👍 Unfortunately, their team came in 3rd place this year to the missile boat waterski-dancing teams from Malta and Canada..... ❓🤔❓ For some reason I cannot seem to find photos or video of what I'm talking about here. It's an enigma....
Hey. The old PT Boats had a range of 500 miles. Flank speed of 40kts. 4- Ma Deuces and 4- 21" torpedo tubes. Still have a few around. They are pretty nice.
I’m not sure what they mean by “Missile Boat” but nowadays a torpedo can be delivered by helicopter. Choppers have a range of about three hundred miles, and can drop a torpedo into the water within a mile of the target. What does this very expensive missile boat do?
The terms "Start" and "Burnout" in the context of missile boats and missile operations typically relate to missile launch and propulsion phases. Here’s an explanation of these terms in detail: --- ### 1. **Start Phase** (Missile Launch) The *start* phase refers to the initiation of the missile's launch sequence. This is the point when the missile is fired, leaving its launcher or vertical launch system (VLS). Key aspects of the start phase include: - **Ignition:** The missile's rocket motor is ignited, generating the thrust required to propel it. - **Guidance Activation:** The missile's onboard systems, such as inertial guidance or GPS, are initialized to guide the missile toward its target. - **Initial Thrust:** During the start phase, the missile begins accelerating under the power of its rocket motor. - **Launch Platform Dynamics:** Depending on the missile and launch platform (e.g., a missile boat or ship), the platform may need to account for recoil or other effects of launch. For missile boats, this phase is critical as the launch must be coordinated with the boat's movement and environmental conditions (e.g., sea state, wind, or enemy countermeasures). --- ### 2. **Burnout Phase** (End of Propulsion) The *burnout* phase refers to the point when the missile's propulsion system (usually a solid rocket motor) expends all its fuel and stops producing thrust. Key aspects of the burnout phase include: - **End of Powered Flight:** After burnout, the missile transitions from powered flight to unpowered (ballistic or gliding) flight, depending on its design. - **Cruise or Terminal Phase Initiation:** For missiles that have a secondary propulsion system (e.g., a ramjet or scramjet), burnout of the initial booster might transition into the activation of the secondary propulsion. Otherwise, the missile proceeds to its terminal phase using kinetic energy and guidance systems. - **Range Limitation:** The missile's maximum range is determined by the energy and velocity achieved before burnout. - **Guidance Continuation:** Even after burnout, the missile's guidance and control systems remain active to ensure it stays on course. --- ### Example in Context: Anti-Ship Missiles For a missile boat launching an **anti-ship missile**, these phases work together as follows: 1. **Start:** The missile is launched using its booster or primary propulsion system. The boat's crew ensures proper targeting and launch timing. 2. **Powered Flight:** The missile accelerates toward its target, guided by radar, GPS, or other systems. 3. **Burnout:** Once the motor burns out, the missile relies on its momentum and guidance systems to reach the target. In some cases, a secondary propulsion system may take over for long-range strikes. --- ### Operational Considerations for Missile Boats - **Tactical Timing:** The crew must carefully time launches to avoid detection or counter-strikes. - **Positioning:** Missile boats often rely on speed, stealth, and mobility to get into an effective firing position. - **Post-Launch Maneuvers:** Once missiles are launched, the missile boat may need to relocate to avoid retaliation or countermeasures. These phases (start and burnout) play a crucial role in the effectiveness of missile operations and the overall success of the mission.
@@Solnoric As long as it is in the fuel oil/Jet A1/diesel family. US Army helicopters can be run on normal diesel fuel for 24 hours in an emergency, but after that the engine must be taken apart and cleaned. Basically the difference between those fuels is just the quality and cleanliness standards, the stuff itself is more or less the same.
A yoke from the old times:the sailors exclaims The Cook CAN fix food-he was roasting hot dogs in the rear. All other food on those boats was premade and reheated in the microwave Owen.
I was enlisted co-pilot (ET1) on USS Plainview, 2 J-79s putting out 30,000 HP going through 2, 5ft titanium screws. 220 feet, 300 tons. We got her up to 43 knots. Left a hell of a rooster tail all over Puget Sound in 1970.
The Pegasus class hydrofoil was powered by a GE LM2500 pushing 18,000 SHP and 2 MB 800 HP diesels. Top speed 50 knots on foils and 12 knots cruising on diesels alone. Could pass everything but a fuelling station as it sucked back 1000 gallons an hour of diesel fuel in go fast mode. Only built 6 of them.
@@voornaam3191 Because it would serve ZERO purpose, they do not propel the boat by jet thrust, thus an after burner would do nothing but waste fuel. This is a turboshaft engine while afterburners are on turbojet
@@voornaam3191 The boat doesn't use thrust, there's a lot of exhaust but it doesn't have very high speed (most of its energy was used to turn the turbine, it's the same, say, with the Abrams tank, you don't see it blowing stuff around even at full power). If you added afterburners, you'd gain very little thrust but increase fuel consumption many times. Basically with AB you'd get a boat that looks awesome, moves about half of a knot faster and burns five times more fuel. And for a military boat it's more important to have five times more range than to look cool.
This boat needs those engines to generate large volumes of hot gas to drive a power turbine. They generate no thrust from the exhaust the way a turbojet engine does.
Cor wish there was more content and length to this video I started to model one of these I believe it is the same type of boat my model is of percasa, I might get around to finishing it one of these days . The lake that my model boat club used closed and there was no more water / lakes that the club could use or afford so it disbanded and I didn't see the point of finishing it off but if I could see more video footage it might get the juices flowing again and just keep it as a static scale model.
Gas turbines aka jet engines. They start the same way as jets do. Get the turbine spinning fast hit the ignitor and introduce the fuel=big flames out the exhaust.
@@louishunter9249 Yes, but this one didn’t. It had intentional surging introduced and I was wondering why? They are calling it a “burnout” startup vs a normal startup.
@@brucebaxter6923 sorry didn't know what knowledge base you were working with. Looked like introduction of too much fuel. I know the temps can spike quickly and it would be called a hot start and you need to shut down and tear down. Not sure here.
@@louishunter9249 Yes. It certainly looked like over fuelling as pulses. I wonder if each pulse was too short to do damage but long enough to clear out excess water or something in the exhaust perhaps?
@@brucebaxter6923 I would have to agree switching or pulsing fuel on and off to avoid a hot or hang start. I have aviation experience and I've never seen it purposely done like that.
That's cool as hell. Hydrofoil? I served aboard Knox (DE/FF-1052 class) and O.H. Perry (FFG-7 class); and have conducted training aboard every cruiser, destroyer, and frigate that sailed out of Pearl in the 80's and 90's; and not a single solitary one of them could do 40 knots. Damn that looks like fun.
One of my friends worked for Vosper Thornycroft he used to tell me about testing the Perkasa torpedo boats on the Solent 4 gas turbine Rolls-Royce Proteus engine's he used to say they were very fast
The Royal Navy had two similar boats based in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover. Very efficient in chasing pirates too…. Rumour has it they were gifted to the Phillipene Navy.
@@voornaam3191 Turbine/Jet fuel isn't really all that flammable, at least in comparison to a lot of other fuels. You might lose a bit of efficiency, but that boat would probably by quite happy with kerosene (a.k.a. Paraffin) just like you use in a lantern or lamps when camping.
You would probably die from the insane vibration and hot exhausts. I've been about 150 meters behind this ship as it turned around in the harbour, at close to idle speed, and the amount of noise almost made me shit my pants. It is insane.
First it sounds like a Diesel, then like a turbine. In any case, that thing gets quicker from the line than my mom's Fiesta, which is not a big deal for any car, but for a boat of dozens of tons?
50 MPH, give or take, in a heavy hunk of steel like that is quite something on water! How quickly can it come to a stop? The water must help, but still, "Equal and opposite reaction" and all the other stuff that I was too dumb to learn!
@lamarrrrr yes. There is extensive data on these boats and their stupidly excessive fuel consumption. I think the fuel consumption is why they weren't used longer.
The LCS class ships should have really hauled butt with the CoDAG setup. Too bad. They just couldn't figure out the hull cracking and combining gear problems. Alot of potential went to waste.
Which is stupid. German frigates run codag just fine, and german sar vessels are built from aluminium and last 30y or more in rough conditions. The tech existed
Three years ago and you're still recycling this old old clip? How can you get a sense of the +40 knots speed if you only record the waves from on board the boat???
Again, from the description of the video: Swedish former Missile Boat R142 Ystad starting turbine and then performs a "burn out" start with all three turbines and 13000 Bhp taking us to +40 knots. Check out www.robotbatar.se/
Reminds me of the time in the navy. Fast patrol boat, 4 engines, 4 propellers, 39 knots top speed, 400 tons gross weight. Ridiculous fuel consumption.
Jaguar classe type 141?
@@MIKE_WOLF_GR Gepard (143A)
Crossing the English Channel in about half an hour ....
@@carsten.hamburg8771 my father was at P6070 kondor, the Hellenic navy had bought 6 types of them.
Did your Schnellboot use MTU-Diesels with 3600 PS like those used on the Tiger-Class? If so the consumption was around 30 Tons Diesel a Day, and actually its not all that much if you compare with any Cold-War-Era Tank, most of those consume a half ton Diesel every 100 km.
That accelerated quite nicely from a standstill!
seemed really smooth
I bet it feels amazing being on that monster during full acceleration
That’s classified…if they showed you they’d have to kill you!
looks like it was about to take off
It has hydrofoils, thats why.
GE LM2500's gas turbine engines. I was a GSM2 onboard the USS Conolly. Nothing like raw power to start your day. 20,000 shaft HP...
“Just a little something “
We changed out a main engine LM2500 on a Destroyer. They took the top of the stack off and it came right out on a set of rails. Pretty impressive stuff.
That was the huge benefit of GTs. But fuel burn is considerable and part load is not much less juicy than full load. They need BIG fuel tanks.
Would have been nice to see the whole boat so we at least know what it looks like!!!
Here you go: goteborg2023.com/uploads/2020/09/Punkt-4-Ystad_stor.jpg
Thanks
For such a big vessel, the acceleration is incredible!
That very much looks like a weapon!!!😎👍
@@plutten2
Thanks!
That thing got up on plane like a damn 12 foot row boat with a 20hp on it! That's some serious power right there!
Now that is a fast attack boat.
try to search USSR ships Orlenok (Экраноплан Орленок) or Lun` (Экраноплан Лунь) and your "power" bar will be raised to the ceiling
No shot there
Aren’t turbine powered vehicles awesome 👍
@@TearsOnAWind i saw one of those on liveleak
Reminds me of the Brave class the Royal Navy had in the sixties. Our school was on a hill overlooking the local harbour and we 'd watch them coming out of the harbour at four knots when they were clear of the harbour multi they would open them up and disappear into the distance. I think there were three Brave Bordered, Brave Cutlass and I can 't remember the third. Too noisy to creep up on anything but they didn't need to they could outrun just about anything.
Thanks for your story
Brave Swordsman
@Richard Harrold Thank you, didn't know about Challenger I shall google it.
@@Brooman56 Thanks, I should have remembered that, but it was a long time ago.
Ключевое слово- убежать
excuse me hi sorry but you appear to have got a 747 stuck in your boat somewhere
Hate when that happens 😁
Gas Turbines are on a whole other level. Incredible power in small packages
And to think all that started from a steam turbine all the way back in the late 1800s
Hence the reason so many old piston engined aircraft which are still useful (because they are so well suited to the job they do) have been converted to the most used small turboprop, the PT-6.
Incredible fuel consumption also.
TRI turbine, TRI Kamewa drives, awesome set-up!!
Keep on rocking the free world
It's like the starting up of the original batmobile
Hahahahaha Good one.... Batteries to power. Turbines to speed............ Launch. Oh, and remember to hold on!
Yeah pretty useless, shiny, flashy and retarded
Was thinking the same thing 😅
Before the eco-boost v6 install?
When fully loaded I have a suspicion that almost half its weight is in fuel.
It burns over 18 gallons per mile, so yeah!
In the immortal words of Dark Helmet:
“Ludicrous Speed GO!”
I did 6 months on Hms Stockholm first then 6 months on Hms Norrköping
Very cool more please. I love boats but I definitely think I would never try to waterski behind that one . I would love a ride on it.😁
I wouldn’t want to be out on deck at top speed, but inside to enjoy the ride would be great!
They take passengers for tours out of Stockholm. It is about 200€ for a day trip. They only run them a few times a year though, late summer.
Norrkoping missle boat
🚫 No, no, their naval missile boat waterskiing team does NOT ski directly behind the boat! Actually, there are two, 18.5 meter long, carbon fibre booms which are extended out from either side of the boat, with an attachment point every 1.6m for all the tow lines. When performing their competitive waterskiing dance routine, there are 20 ski-dancers at once! 😉👍
Unfortunately, their team came in 3rd place this year to the missile boat waterski-dancing teams from Malta and Canada.....
❓🤔❓ For some reason I cannot seem to find photos or video of what I'm talking about here. It's an enigma....
I rode on that one for 465 days :)
Thanks for sharing.
Love the sound of gas turbine starting up.
(beautiful boat by the way).
Thanks for watching!
Sounds like an m1 Abrams
Used to warm myself behind them in the wintertime, keeping my face in clear air.
Hey. The old PT Boats had a range of 500 miles. Flank speed of 40kts. 4- Ma Deuces and 4- 21" torpedo tubes.
Still have a few around.
They are pretty nice.
Cool 😎
I’m not sure what they mean by “Missile Boat” but nowadays a torpedo can be delivered by helicopter.
Choppers have a range of about three hundred miles, and can drop a torpedo into the water within a mile of the target.
What does this very expensive missile boat do?
Hey, this boat is not in service anymore. It is from the cold war era.
Man, I'd like to see the reduction gear on that beast!
And, who makes these large format gear boxes .... GE? Westinghouse? TRW?
Bristol proteus is the company that produced this powerplant I think they were turboprop turbines primarily
Cool videos,regards from🇧🇻
Thanks for watching!
The terms "Start" and "Burnout" in the context of missile boats and missile operations typically relate to missile launch and propulsion phases. Here’s an explanation of these terms in detail:
---
### 1. **Start Phase** (Missile Launch)
The *start* phase refers to the initiation of the missile's launch sequence. This is the point when the missile is fired, leaving its launcher or vertical launch system (VLS). Key aspects of the start phase include:
- **Ignition:** The missile's rocket motor is ignited, generating the thrust required to propel it.
- **Guidance Activation:** The missile's onboard systems, such as inertial guidance or GPS, are initialized to guide the missile toward its target.
- **Initial Thrust:** During the start phase, the missile begins accelerating under the power of its rocket motor.
- **Launch Platform Dynamics:** Depending on the missile and launch platform (e.g., a missile boat or ship), the platform may need to account for recoil or other effects of launch.
For missile boats, this phase is critical as the launch must be coordinated with the boat's movement and environmental conditions (e.g., sea state, wind, or enemy countermeasures).
---
### 2. **Burnout Phase** (End of Propulsion)
The *burnout* phase refers to the point when the missile's propulsion system (usually a solid rocket motor) expends all its fuel and stops producing thrust. Key aspects of the burnout phase include:
- **End of Powered Flight:** After burnout, the missile transitions from powered flight to unpowered (ballistic or gliding) flight, depending on its design.
- **Cruise or Terminal Phase Initiation:** For missiles that have a secondary propulsion system (e.g., a ramjet or scramjet), burnout of the initial booster might transition into the activation of the secondary propulsion. Otherwise, the missile proceeds to its terminal phase using kinetic energy and guidance systems.
- **Range Limitation:** The missile's maximum range is determined by the energy and velocity achieved before burnout.
- **Guidance Continuation:** Even after burnout, the missile's guidance and control systems remain active to ensure it stays on course.
---
### Example in Context: Anti-Ship Missiles
For a missile boat launching an **anti-ship missile**, these phases work together as follows:
1. **Start:** The missile is launched using its booster or primary propulsion system. The boat's crew ensures proper targeting and launch timing.
2. **Powered Flight:** The missile accelerates toward its target, guided by radar, GPS, or other systems.
3. **Burnout:** Once the motor burns out, the missile relies on its momentum and guidance systems to reach the target. In some cases, a secondary propulsion system may take over for long-range strikes.
---
### Operational Considerations for Missile Boats
- **Tactical Timing:** The crew must carefully time launches to avoid detection or counter-strikes.
- **Positioning:** Missile boats often rely on speed, stealth, and mobility to get into an effective firing position.
- **Post-Launch Maneuvers:** Once missiles are launched, the missile boat may need to relocate to avoid retaliation or countermeasures.
These phases (start and burnout) play a crucial role in the effectiveness of missile operations and the overall success of the mission.
Wow! Thanks for detailed info (and for watching) 👍
The Swedes build some awesome stuff.
1st time seeing this on a boat other than hydro racing. Pretty cool😄👍
Glad you like it, thanks for watching!
Is there any real useful/rational reason to have jets on a boat? I'm mostly referring to the fuel vs. distance/speed /upkeep and maint./parts etc.
Power to weight ratio is it. Turbines guzzle fuel, but can weigh 1/10th as much as a comparable HP marine engine.
Size and weight savings. Partly offset by big reduction gears and more fuel needed. But when cost is no object, why not?
@@deejaytrizay It's the YT comment section, I wasn't going to write a doctoral dissertation.
When you need raw power nothing else comes close. You can also run them on mixed fuels in an emergency (not good for the turbine but can be done)
@@Solnoric As long as it is in the fuel oil/Jet A1/diesel family. US Army helicopters can be run on normal diesel fuel for 24 hours in an emergency, but after that the engine must be taken apart and cleaned. Basically the difference between those fuels is just the quality and cleanliness standards, the stuff itself is more or less the same.
Looks like a hot start on those turbines.
Greetings from Indonesia, senior Arup Archipelago, Maluku province on the Indonesian border with Australia
Meny Tons moving with such power fantastic 👏
Indeed! 230 tons...
You could ski behind it and roast hotdogs on a stick at the same time!
A yoke from the old times:the sailors exclaims The Cook CAN fix food-he was roasting hot dogs in the rear. All other food on those boats was premade and reheated in the microwave Owen.
Yes, but the buns might get a little soggy.
The buns would be crispy too if you skied backwards.
@@vonbuzz9009 Not those buns, but you are correct. Talk about a bun warmer - Pass the Gray Poop Mustard
You'd be the roasted hotdog 😉
I was enlisted co-pilot (ET1) on USS Plainview, 2 J-79s putting out 30,000 HP going through 2, 5ft titanium screws. 220 feet, 300 tons.
We got her up to 43 knots. Left a hell of a rooster tail all over Puget Sound in 1970.
Wow... !!! My best friend, Great Good... !!! I wish you every day of your development.
Thank you! Cheers!
SRN4 cross Channel hovercraft had 4x Bristol Proteus gas turbines - similarly amazing 😊
@Stem Artin th-cam.com/video/5yM4qzvvsEg/w-d-xo.html
@Stem Artin nah Sea Cat is a catamaran hull. Hovercraft are hovercraft.
The Pegasus class hydrofoil was powered by a GE LM2500 pushing 18,000 SHP and 2 MB 800 HP diesels. Top speed 50 knots on foils and 12 knots cruising on diesels alone. Could pass everything but a fuelling station as it sucked back 1000 gallons an hour of diesel fuel in go fast mode. Only built 6 of them.
That dam boat was gettn somewhere!
He was haulin
Ok i have a Glider 7meter with Steyr M266 Engine and an Alamarin Jet Propulsion. I was Satisfied untill now😭 ❤🇩🇪😎 Awesome
Cool. Thanks for the Ride.
Does it have propellers run by turbo shaft engines or those are jet engines? lol The sound is incredible 🥰
@dvs0180 yes, but does the turbo shaft run the propellers or there is no propellers and it just works on jet propulsion?
@@MrSatanLucyferis shaft runs propellers.
that turbine exhaust would keep a skier nice and dry (and likely crispy)
Absolutely amazing!
Does it have afterburners?
Nope, it's like turbines on a helicopter, just in this case they drive propellers instead of a rotor.
@@AndrewCZ47 And that means those engines could easily have had afterburners. Why not?
@@voornaam3191 Because it would serve ZERO purpose, they do not propel the boat by jet thrust, thus an after burner would do nothing but waste fuel. This is a turboshaft engine while afterburners are on turbojet
@@voornaam3191 The boat doesn't use thrust, there's a lot of exhaust but it doesn't have very high speed (most of its energy was used to turn the turbine, it's the same, say, with the Abrams tank, you don't see it blowing stuff around even at full power). If you added afterburners, you'd gain very little thrust but increase fuel consumption many times.
Basically with AB you'd get a boat that looks awesome, moves about half of a knot faster and burns five times more fuel. And for a military boat it's more important to have five times more range than to look cool.
This boat needs those engines to generate large volumes of hot gas to drive a power turbine. They generate no thrust from the exhaust the way a turbojet engine does.
Is it a water jet or geared to props?
Props
Spika båt ?
Jag Var på tp 44 med 3 x isotta frachini polar motorer, fint ljud 😀
Nej, R142 Ystad är annan klass, men Spica är också coola.
The sound is really cool 😎
It really is :) Thanks for watching!
Cor wish there was more content and length to this video I started to model one of these I believe it is the same type of boat my model is of percasa, I might get around to finishing it one of these days . The lake that my model boat club used closed and there was no more water / lakes that the club could use or afford so it disbanded and I didn't see the point of finishing it off but if I could see more video footage it might get the juices flowing again and just keep it as a static scale model.
Perhaps I can come around with some more content on this boat ;)
Best of luck on your project!
Can anyone explain the burnout start?
I am not familiar with the surge type starting?
Gas turbines aka jet engines. They start the same way as jets do. Get the turbine spinning fast hit the ignitor and introduce the fuel=big flames out the exhaust.
@@louishunter9249
Yes, but this one didn’t.
It had intentional surging introduced and I was wondering why?
They are calling it a “burnout” startup vs a normal startup.
@@brucebaxter6923 sorry didn't know what knowledge base you were working with. Looked like introduction of too much fuel. I know the temps can spike quickly and it would be called a hot start and you need to shut down and tear down. Not sure here.
@@louishunter9249
Yes. It certainly looked like over fuelling as pulses.
I wonder if each pulse was too short to do damage but long enough to clear out excess water or something in the exhaust perhaps?
@@brucebaxter6923 I would have to agree switching or pulsing fuel on and off to avoid a hot or hang start. I have aviation experience and I've never seen it purposely done like that.
Ystad 😍😍😍😍
Wow that's impressive. So fast!
Impressive for such a big boat (240 tonnes)
That's cool as hell. Hydrofoil? I served aboard Knox (DE/FF-1052 class) and O.H. Perry (FFG-7 class); and have conducted training aboard every cruiser, destroyer, and frigate that sailed out of Pearl in the 80's and 90's; and not a single solitary one of them could do 40 knots. Damn that looks like fun.
Glad you like it, thanks for watching!
I totally need this motor on my bass boat!
Haha
The most American boat I’ve ever seen 🦅🦅🦅
I see your point, but it was very Swedish back then. :)
I was on hms Piteå, T138, later R138, 1976. Really nice boats.
One of my friends worked for Vosper Thornycroft he used to tell me about testing the Perkasa torpedo boats on the Solent 4 gas turbine Rolls-Royce Proteus engine's he used to say they were very fast
0:38
Boat: Missile Boat R142 ready for takeoff
Tower: R142 you're clear for takeoff, fly safe
Wonder how many skiers you could pull with that thing ! 🤔
I bet quite a few. That would be cool...
All of them ;)
Reminds me of the Danish Willemoes Class missile-torpedo boats I served on from 1990-91
"Frying chickens in the barnyard." (Dr Strangelove)
God I love power and acceleration....
#metoo 😁
Wow!! Did not knew that! 👍🏼
Horsepower please, I just saw in the description 13000 HP
Call the ship yard. Order one. Then you'll know these silly numbers. Who cares? The insurance company, maybe?
13000 HP = 13000 Horse Power.
I assume you're serious and this is a language barrier and metric barrier thing. That's 9.56 megawatts.
thats a real exhaust tube !
I am a member of missile boat too i have to say it have 4 MTU's engines and the noise looks like a lot with this one
The Royal Navy had two similar boats based in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover. Very efficient in chasing pirates too…. Rumour has it they were gifted to the Phillipene Navy.
Ah yes, the brutal power of the singing gas turbine.
Turbines are pretty awesome🤘
How much fuel does that badass hold lol
Spica t 121, 3 gasturbines, 40 knots, fuelconsumption 1m²/hour...
Those missile boat's are taken out of the swedish navy, they have the Visby class now
Is this driving a hydra pump vector drive, or is it just engine exaust providing thrust?
@@ph11p3540 Not native in English, so I might misunderstand the question. There are three turbine engines powering quite traditional propellers.
So do these boats just have jet engines? Or jet turbines that spin the propellers
Turbine engines that spin props.
Wow! What great boat
I’m guessing 38 knots top speed? 🤷♂️ 👍🍻
Close :) 40 knots (and 240 tonnes of boat)
@@plutten2
Hi Jorgen,
Thanks for letting me know.
I was close 😃
That’s a lot of boat to get moving at that speed.
Cheers from Australia 👍🍻
@@plutten2 That's 200 tonnes of fuel and 40 tonnes of boat, I guess? It must be a floating Molotov Cocktail.
@@voornaam3191 Turbine/Jet fuel isn't really all that flammable, at least in comparison to a lot of other fuels. You might lose a bit of efficiency, but that boat would probably by quite happy with kerosene (a.k.a. Paraffin) just like you use in a lantern or lamps when camping.
One hell of a ski boat
With a rocket exhaust in your face haha
Yepp 👍
didn't nessesarily need skis, the boat is fast enough to pull you along on your bare feet alone.
You would probably die from the insane vibration and hot exhausts.
I've been about 150 meters behind this ship as it turned around in the harbour, at close to idle speed, and the amount of noise almost made me shit my pants. It is insane.
Aw man the sound of that turbine spooling up and operating is orgasmic
Indeed 😍
When I was a kid, they promised me cars would sound like this by now.
That would be loud rush hour traffic 😂
I only saw two turbine ports open. Are you sure all 3 were running ?
Yes they were
First it sounds like a Diesel, then like a turbine. In any case, that thing gets quicker from the line than my mom's Fiesta, which is not a big deal for any car, but for a boat of dozens of tons?
😁 Indeed,and it is 230 of them tonnes…
I have a 4 foot long radio controlled model of this boat.
and why not a vieo of it on youtube ? 😎
I think you meant to say "jet" boat. Might be wrong, but I always thought a "missile" was a projectile.
It is a military boat, meant to fire missiles, but with a very cool turbine engine system.
@korynta It's main armament is four heavy anti ship missiles and two heavy torpedoes.
That sounds pretty bad ass
I would love to have one. But would need it to come with a fuel card.
Indeed! Glad you like it, thanks for watching!
How fast can it go?
Ok, I found it, it goes 76 km/h
50 MPH, give or take, in a heavy hunk of steel like that is quite something on water! How quickly can it come to a stop? The water must help, but still, "Equal and opposite reaction" and all the other stuff that I was too dumb to learn!
If I remember right, you stop this 240 metric tons in less that 60meters.
Would be nice to show the boat
Here is a link about the boat. Feel free to google translate :)
www.skippo.se/batar/robotbaten-r142-ystad-13-500-hastkrafter
I don't think solar or wind power can do that.
In sci-fi they use tokamaks for the spaceships.
That sounded insane. Only taxpayer dollars could afford to fuel that thing.
Over 18 gallons every mile, so yeah!
@@charlieodom9107What, really???
@lamarrrrr yes. There is extensive data on these boats and their stupidly excessive fuel consumption. I think the fuel consumption is why they weren't used longer.
Does it use a gear reduction and propellers and we're just seeing the exhaust? Or is it just propelled by the thrust from the jet turbines?
Propellers
Is it called a missile boat cause it launches missiles or because it is a missile?
Kind of both…
“It’s better to burnout than fade away!”
aaawwwryt dennnn
Tidy looking boat..
Ships are commercial .
Thanks for posting.
The LCS class ships should have really hauled butt with the CoDAG setup. Too bad. They just couldn't figure out the hull cracking and combining gear problems. Alot of potential went to waste.
Which is stupid. German frigates run codag just fine, and german sar vessels are built from aluminium and last 30y or more in rough conditions. The tech existed
Full support to your channel ✌New subscriber 😊 from Philippines
Awesome thank you! 🤘
Can you imagine the amount of fuel this thing goes through
Yep. The boat is from a time when that didn’t matter 🙂
@ the good old days.
Wow so cool. Thanks for sharing
Thanks for watching!
I could ski behind that thing.. And I think I would enjoy it.
And I think you have reason to believe you are right. I think ANYBODY can waterski behind this thing. On one bare foot. On ones nose. On a bald head.
Rolls Royce Proteus? Looks very similar to Brave Challenger
Correct 👍
Three years ago and you're still recycling this old old clip?
How can you get a sense of the +40 knots speed if you only record the waves from on board the boat???
How much does it weigh how long is it what is the top speed how fast does it accelerate how much horsepower does it have how many engines
Again, from the description of the video:
Swedish former Missile Boat R142 Ystad starting turbine and then performs a "burn out" start with all three turbines and 13000 Bhp taking us to +40 knots.
Check out www.robotbatar.se/
Why not show a photo of what exactly was going through the water
Theres a Tacobell joke in here somewhere! 😂 🤣💨💨💨
....@ 0:22 Thunderbirds intro theme music 👍
Is that hydrojet or propeller?
It’s propeller propulsion. Thanks for watching.
@@plutten2 Ah, thanks!
I bet it takes some serious logistics to keep those things going during a conflict. Lots of fuel to move!
So why is it using a propella, i don't get it.
It’s not jet propulsion, it’s turbine engines.
@@plutten2 Thx for explaining.