You just saved me big time I had a test the other day and I watched this the night before and 10 mins before test and I studied everything and passed 🔥🔥😄
Thanks! That is what my shop teacher, Mr. Leinbach, always said too. KISS - Keep it Simple (Stupid). And if I recall, he is the one who taught me to read a micrometer with this same method.
They are for reading one more decimal place; to the "ten thousandths" place. Most mechanic work does not require precision beyond the "thousandths or third decimal place" but some more precision work such as engine rebuild might require that. To read those lines, simply select which number on the sleeve aligns with one of the horizontal lines on the spinning thimble. Which ever number is aligned, that is what gets written in the 4th decimal place. (Hint: The number will always be a 0-9) I hope that helps!
Ok so I have a 2-3 mic. The biggest number I see on the sleeve is 9 and that’s where the thimble stops. No lines after the 9 and the number on the thimble that lines up with the centre line on the sleeve is 8 so would that be 2.908? Anyone know?
Going by what you said it sounds like that would be reading 2.908" but that is a bit surprising to me. I find it a bit surprising that there would be no lines after the 9 on the sleeve. I have seen micrometers (for rotors) that measure from .3 to 1.3 but I have never heard of anything like what you are describing. Are you sure the micrometer is not just stuck and not opening up more?
In the first photo @ 0:41 , it shows that the micrometer is a 1 to 2" range. That means everything we measure will start with 1.000 and go up from there.
This is a good explanation. But I think this is missing one final step if you want to get that last .0001" of precision. You need to look at the long horizontal lines and choose the one that most closely lines up with the smaller horizontal lines on the indicator.
You are absolutely correct, to read to the .0001" you would add that fifth step. I didn't include that intentionally in this video because many of my students struggle reading just to the thousandths place. I am considering making another video to go over how to read to the ten-thousandths for those high-precision tasks like engine work.
I assume you are referring to the "6" in the third decimal place, or thousandths. This came from adding the .075 plus .001, which creates .076. (1 +5 =6). I hope that answers your question.
@@kellysmith6704 Yes, I totally understand. I might make a second video that shows some more precise measuring and include the vernier scale. When we teach it to our students we teach this method the first year and then add the vernier the second year when they get into measuring engine parts. I found breaking it up that way seems to really reduce the amount of confusion.
I can't be the only one who see this as wrong, am I?? How in the world does he come up with a'1.476', when it not even past an inch?? Should he have said ONLY .476"??
I am sure you are not the only one but you are missing the first step, "What is the range?". In the example we are using a 1 to 2 inch micrometer, meaning that it starts at 1 inch and goes up from there. 0:46 It would actually be impossible to get an accurate reading of 0.476" with a 1 -2" micrometer. I hope this clarifies it.
Thx brother... Great teaching. Its been 6 years im catching up.
Thank you! I started a precision machining class 3 days ago and was totally lost on micrometers. This video helped me grasp the basics.
I am glad to hear it was helpful. Thanks!
I’ve been all over TH-cam looking for a comprehensive video on how to read a micrometer and this was by FAR the best!! Thank you so much!
Thanks for the positive feedback and I am glad to hear it was a help. You are welcome!
bro you are a blessing wish you was my professor right now
Thanks so much for the feedback! I was very fortunate to have great teachers along the way and just passing along some of what I was taught.
This is SO helpful. Thank you!
You just saved me big time I had a test the other day and I watched this the night before and 10 mins before test and I studied everything and passed 🔥🔥😄
More people need to see this I work in a mill and the old guys are…. Yea that should say enough 😂. Thanks for the help bro.
Thanks for the compliment, glad to hear it was helpful and endorsed by the old guys!
Perfect explanation - Thanks
Thankyou very much I learned a lot how to read a inch micrometer .
I am glad it helped!
Good teaching style
Thank you sir. It was the best explanation 👏
KISS. Keeping it simple. Love this. Great video 😊
Thanks! That is what my shop teacher, Mr. Leinbach, always said too. KISS - Keep it Simple (Stupid). And if I recall, he is the one who taught me to read a micrometer with this same method.
What are the horizontal lines at the top for please
They are for reading one more decimal place; to the "ten thousandths" place. Most mechanic work does not require precision beyond the "thousandths or third decimal place" but some more precision work such as engine rebuild might require that. To read those lines, simply select which number on the sleeve aligns with one of the horizontal lines on the spinning thimble. Which ever number is aligned, that is what gets written in the 4th decimal place. (Hint: The number will always be a 0-9) I hope that helps!
@@JimMackHeavyEquipment thanks for your input, yes it makes sense
thank you becuase my class is required to use those lines.@@JimMackHeavyEquipment
helped me big time
Ok so I have a 2-3 mic. The biggest number I see on the sleeve is 9 and that’s where the thimble stops. No lines after the 9 and the number on the thimble that lines up with the centre line on the sleeve is 8 so would that be 2.908? Anyone know?
Going by what you said it sounds like that would be reading 2.908" but that is a bit surprising to me. I find it a bit surprising that there would be no lines after the 9 on the sleeve. I have seen micrometers (for rotors) that measure from .3 to 1.3 but I have never heard of anything like what you are describing. Are you sure the micrometer is not just stuck and not opening up more?
Where did you get the 1.000 from
In the first photo @ 0:41 , it shows that the micrometer is a 1 to 2" range. That means everything we measure will start with 1.000 and go up from there.
The 1.000 lost me
Thanks
This is a good explanation. But I think this is missing one final step if you want to get that last .0001" of precision. You need to look at the long horizontal lines and choose the one that most closely lines up with the smaller horizontal lines on the indicator.
You are absolutely correct, to read to the .0001" you would add that fifth step. I didn't include that intentionally in this video because many of my students struggle reading just to the thousandths place. I am considering making another video to go over how to read to the ten-thousandths for those high-precision tasks like engine work.
Where you did you get the six from
I assume you are referring to the "6" in the third decimal place, or thousandths. This came from adding the .075 plus .001, which creates .076. (1 +5 =6). I hope that answers your question.
Thank you
Very well done. I would just add something about the vernier scale.
@@kellysmith6704 Yes, I totally understand. I might make a second video that shows some more precise measuring and include the vernier scale. When we teach it to our students we teach this method the first year and then add the vernier the second year when they get into measuring engine parts. I found breaking it up that way seems to really reduce the amount of confusion.
turn it and read the 10ths marking 0.0001 to 0.0009
Thank you
Thanks 👍
You're welcome 👍
A little bit complicated after metric micrometers, but nothing to do only need to learn it.
I can't be the only one who see this as wrong, am I?? How in the world does he come up with a'1.476', when it not even past an inch?? Should he have said ONLY .476"??
I am sure you are not the only one but you are missing the first step, "What is the range?". In the example we are using a 1 to 2 inch micrometer, meaning that it starts at 1 inch and goes up from there. 0:46 It would actually be impossible to get an accurate reading of 0.476" with a 1 -2" micrometer. I hope this clarifies it.
@@JimMackHeavyEquipment Got it.
Thanks man, this helped. 'Preciate it.
Thank you