Wits & Wagers @AwSHUX2020

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024
  • From October 2020. AwSHUX​ - April 23-25, 2021
    Free - no signup required, come join the fun!
    Support the Show: bit.ly/Support... / / shutupandsitdown
    Visit SU&SD for more cardboard antics: www.shutupandsi...
    ~FOLLOW US AROUND, WHY DON'T YOU~
    Podcast: anchor.fm/susd
    Twitter: / shutupshow
    Instagram: / shut.up.and.sit.down
    Twitch: / shutupandsitdown
    TikTok: / shutupshow

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @Hamfrags
    @Hamfrags 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    My heart skipped a beat! For a second I thought AwSHUX spring had started yesterday and I had missed it!

  • @SonoftheMustardTiger
    @SonoftheMustardTiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Only these guys can make a train wreck look so good.

  • @tyrnicl
    @tyrnicl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I loved watching this live, great to see it again (in preparation for tonight)! W&W became my most wanted game from this.

  • @jasonpapworth4428
    @jasonpapworth4428 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The moment you flick back and rewatching Matt space out 🤣🤣

  • @gordonwiley2006
    @gordonwiley2006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is the kind of pile up I expect, and look forward to, from SUSD.

  • @WeFIOCommunity
    @WeFIOCommunity 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This made my heart happy! Thanks for the great entertainment all!

  • @bsw051
    @bsw051 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have vegas edition. Came with everything you need. Have never seen an expansion.

    • @marccampbell3851
      @marccampbell3851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Looks like he ordered "Vegas Wits & Wagers (2017)" instead of "Wits & Wagers: It's Vegas Baby! (2019)".

  • @alexthunderle
    @alexthunderle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Licensed games Edit
    A total of 704 known licensed games (715 cartridges, including compilations of previously released games) were released for the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) during its lifespan... At least if we trust in Wikipedia ;)

  • @spooncastro
    @spooncastro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I believe the final scores were:
    Omari - 3600
    Quinns - 4100
    OFPG - 4200
    Emma - 6800

  • @GunslingerSNP
    @GunslingerSNP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had thought about playing this over zoom with family. I’ll stick to Just One and Herd Mentality as W&W is soooo much easier in person 😂😂😂

  • @DPharos
    @DPharos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Reading chat after locking in your answer but BEFORE assigning chips = also cheating :)

  • @frankharr9466
    @frankharr9466 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was fun. There needs to be more Let's Plays. The pandemic made everything just so hard.
    I think Quinns' feathers are very nice.
    I don't know. 75?
    Is it larger than the real answer? No? Then it doesn't loose
    O.K., at 3 to one, you get your bet back and then three times that bet. So, 2+3- is 4.
    Thank goodness for Mik and Starla!
    Homer never had a problem getting hired. Well, not MUCH of a problem.
    Steven King novels? I don't know. 102?
    When Chat is ignored, Chat can get pretty insistent.
    Jorden? 23?
    M., S. and Q. for the big win!
    Emma!

  • @anonimouse5533
    @anonimouse5533 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    i thought i knew how the scoring system worked and then i thought i did again and now i have no idea lmfao

    • @anonimouse5533
      @anonimouse5533 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LMAO nevermind figured it out

  • @TLEberle
    @TLEberle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kinda wants those betting chips for my version.

  • @Egornnn
    @Egornnn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It feels like it should not be possible to bet 10to1 onto your own answer.

    • @spooncastro
      @spooncastro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It balances itself out. For example look at both OFPG and Quinns scores. They only got a pay off once. I'm assuming that you can't put more than one token on it though, and probably no extra money, but who knows.

  • @kylefrid5911
    @kylefrid5911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It was incredibly painful to see Quinns convince everyone that gambling payouts work in an extremely wrong way. It also meant that everyone was getting much less money and that there was no reason for people to bet on the colors.

    • @MichaelNerman
      @MichaelNerman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Edit: I was confused

    • @kylefrid5911
      @kylefrid5911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MichaelNerman Yeah, when you play with actual betting rules you make money on the 1 to 1. The way they played it you just don't lose money which essentially makes them pointless spaces.

    • @MichaelNerman
      @MichaelNerman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're right. I misread the rules, and they played it wrong. The only weird thing with the rules is that you get your betting chip back even if it was on a wrong bet. I thought Quinns actually noticed the error, but didn't press it when Matt contradicted him.

    • @fnord3125
      @fnord3125 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it's so much more intuitive when you have physical chips, because then if you win, you take back the chips you put in, and THEN take an additional amount. when you're just tracking numbers i think it's less intuitive.

    • @jonnyramsden1161
      @jonnyramsden1161 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha yeah getting that totally wrong 🤦 you only lose the money you bet when you don't win so betting one on red and being right means your total increases by 1, otherwise it would be totally pointless - you'd only ever stand to lose money by betting on those odds otherwise

  • @HeyMiguel23
    @HeyMiguel23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yay!

  • @kushlinfield7106
    @kushlinfield7106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MR PLOUGH

  • @djb3v
    @djb3v 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome

  • @RazzleDazzle23
    @RazzleDazzle23 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Those push ups cant be real push ups... i assume just some kind of rocking motion..

  • @3556df44
    @3556df44 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surely it's best to have everyone hold up their answers at the same time....

  • @wojciechnatanek5964
    @wojciechnatanek5964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No way, im first .Good job guy's