The STANDARD MODEL: A Theory of (almost) EVERYTHING Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Signup for your FREE trial to The Great Courses Plus here: ow.ly/Ri5Z30rFSmc
    Online Blackboard video: • Beyond the Standard Mo...
    The holy grail of physics research is a theory of everything. But we already have a pretty good model for such a theory. It is the Standard model of particle physics. It describes all fundamental particles that we are aware of, and three of the 4 known fundamental forces, electromagnetism, strong, and weak interactions. It just doesn’t include gravity.
    The simple equation and chart actually represents very complex mathematical equations that can take years of graduate level study to fully understand. It was developed by hundreds of scientists over several decades. In this video, I explain the math intuitively.
    0:00 - The best known theory
    2:00 - The Standard Model explained
    4:05 - What is a Lagrangian
    5:01 - How forces interact
    6:52 - How matter interacts with forces
    9:32 - Higgs-boson interactions
    11:25 - Higgs-matter interactions
    13:23 - Summary
    Ordinary matter that we experience around us is really just made of 4 particles, the up and down quarks which make up the protons and neutrons in the nuclei of atoms, electrons which form a cloud around the nucleus, and a near massless particle - the electron neutrino which is created during the fusion process in stars like the sun. The other particles are rare and don’t typically exist in ordinary matter.
    The difference between quarks and leptons is that quarks interact with the strong nuclear force which binds the nuclei of atoms together, whereas leptons do not. The Bosons are the force carriers. The gluons carry the strong force which binds the nuclei of atoms. The W plus, W minus and Z boson carry the weak force which is responsible for some kinds of radiation. And the photons carry the electromagnetic force responsible for all electricity, magnetism and chemistry.
    Lastly, we have the Higgs boson which is important for giving mass to all fundamental particles.
    A Lagrangian is just like the sum of all energies. The entire universe can be represented by the mathematics that accounts for energy. The standard model is a quantum field theory. This means that particles are an excitation in a quantum field. It is not like a tiny marble. It is like tiny waves.
    The first term is composed of two matrices F sub mu nu, and F superscript mu nu. This term represents all the ways that all the force carrying particles, the bosons interact with each other. Only the Higgs in not included in this term.
    The next term in the simple Lagrangian refers to the fermion fields and their interaction with the gauge fields. Simply put, it describes how matter interacts with forces. There is a factor i in these terms. This is the imaginary number defined as the square root of minus one. It is a mathematical tool that allow the use of more numbers so we are not constrained to only the simple real numbers. This is allowed in physics as long as your final result representing physical values does not contain it.
    Particles have a property where they are either right-handed or left-handed. Right handed means that the spin of the particle is in the same direction as the motion of the particle. Left handed means that the spin is in the opposite direction of motion. This is important for leptons because it turns out that only left-handed neutrinos exist. But, electrons and its heavier cousins the Muon and Tau particle, can be both left or right-handed.
    The next two terms describe how the force-carrying particles interact with the Higgs field and how the Higgs interacts with itself. Higgs is the only field in the standard model that has a potential. The potential is what is responsible for giving mass.
    The subscripts R and L, again refer to the left and right-handed particles. The Y (gamma) represents the Yukawa couplings of each particle to the Higgs field - The stronger the coupling, the higher the mass that the particle acquires.
    Finally, the last term is this h.c. terms and that just means Hermitian conjugate. While the prior term describes the interaction between a Higgs particle and matter particles, this describes the same interaction with antimatter particles. We have to take the antimatter particles into account in this Lagrangian because they also exist.
    This equation is describes what almost all the universe it made of, as we understand it. The first term is how all the quantum forces of the universe interact with each other. The second term is how matter interacts with all the forces. The third term is how force particles gain mass. The fourth term is how the Higgs interacts with itself. The fifth and sixth terms describe are how the matter and antimatter particles gain mass.
    #standardmodel
    #standardmodellagrangian
    #theoryofeverything
    Although this is the best and closest thing we have to a theory of everything, it has some gaps, gravity, dark matter and Dark energy is not in this model. So there is plenty of work to be done.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @Grandunifiedcelery
    @Grandunifiedcelery 3 ปีที่แล้ว +199

    The Standard Model Lagrangian (4-line version) is explained perfectly! Thank you so much!

    • @Grandunifiedcelery
      @Grandunifiedcelery 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I saved this video on my playlist.

    • @atharvmm9805
      @atharvmm9805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Grandunifiedcelery me too !!

    • @route61jen
      @route61jen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@atharvmm9805 me too💗

    • @Grandunifiedcelery
      @Grandunifiedcelery 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@atharvmm9805 I made a similar video, but it's not as good as the one he made💖

    • @fakhruddinnalawala5451
      @fakhruddinnalawala5451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can someone explain how does light interfere with itself/other light, if photons don't interact with other photons?

  • @parasdahia8343
    @parasdahia8343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    I don't understand much in this, but still listening him interestingly.

    • @Albert011
      @Albert011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I understand it and I’m only 12 years old

    • @jakublizon6375
      @jakublizon6375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You will. It just takes time, and an insatiable curiosity of how reality works.

    • @deivid6774
      @deivid6774 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Albert011 Wow!

    • @kakalibhattacherjee27
      @kakalibhattacherjee27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Albert011 It's really very easy to say you understand.The credit goes to Arvin Ash But when you really get into these equations, everything seems blank. There are many great stories and sacrifices in every single term of this equation....
      But still salute your curiosity.

    • @Albert011
      @Albert011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kakalibhattacherjee27 yeah ik but thx

  • @informaldeviant7751
    @informaldeviant7751 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    So eloquently explained, yet I still have no understanding of this. Which is why I love the universe. Absolutely beautiful! 🤘🏼

  • @anarakberov7173
    @anarakberov7173 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It's the best explanation that I have ever watched

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "BEST" means only "COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR IQ"

  • @LukePluto
    @LukePluto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    this was really well done and was at the perfect level of depth for me, thank you!

  • @maxsteele3686
    @maxsteele3686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I’ve followed your channel for a couple years now. You know how they say that you don’t truly know something unless you can teach it in simple terms to a layperson? I’ve always thought you excel at that, and represent the true innovation of the internet: free access to all the information of the human race. The names of your videos, ie the topics that you teach, are always so exciting bc I know that I’ll be learning something knew about a topic I absolutely love. They’re never too simple, and they’re never too complicated.
    I won’t pretend that I can suddenly understand and solve the mathematical and physic formulas like the ones in this video, but having someone just break down and explain a formula in their elementary parts, I feel like I gain a respect for the smartest and most intelligent discoveries made by humans to explain the universe at the very large (general relativity) and the universe of the very small (quantum mechanics). I’ve actually felt so inspired by this and other amazing science TH-cam channels that I am going back to college and trying to major in one of these fields.
    So thank you. I feel excited for life when I wake up everyday and embark on the journey of acquiring new knowledge. Sorry if this has sounded cheesy.

    • @catoleg
      @catoleg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Such a good comment. You described exactly what I think and feel.

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You explained yourself perfectly. I know how you feel.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about reading a textbook on the subject. Jesus, you honestly believe YT videos will help you graduate? What a waste of entropy

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226
      I graduated over 50 years ago, my friend.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dr.jamesolack8504 right fellow PhD. Why do you infer this comment was aimed at you and not the "cheesy" OT

  • @petergebbie2853
    @petergebbie2853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Arvin, Just as your series title suggests, you have an amazing ability to take the most complex ideas and break them down into understandable bite-size pieces! Well done and keep up your terrific work!

  • @msislam6751
    @msislam6751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for explaining intuitively so well.This will make the basic❤️.

  • @danielackles4265
    @danielackles4265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My gratitude for your content is of great magnitude, and increases every time I see another video. Thank you so much!

  • @avnishhhhh
    @avnishhhhh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    just the explanation I needed. Explained beautifully

  • @frede1905
    @frede1905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Absolutely fantastic video. I have never seen a video before going into depth on the standard model Lagrangian. This must get to my list of equations I wish to more fully understand some time in my life!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @pyne1976
    @pyne1976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    A good follow up video would be a visual guide to the standard model, possibly animating how the fermions and bosons interact/ decay. Great video as always Arvin.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Good idea. Thanks!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @steriledial
      @steriledial 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Hyperduality
      When you say, “The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast !“
      My understanding of the biblical number of 6 is that it represented heavenly imperfection. The number 7 signifying heavenly perfection, and 3 signifying earthly completion. The 3 six’s illustrated an earthly reach towards (a mythological) heavenly perfection, and falling short of it. Simply symbolic.
      Can I ask, do you honestly think that there was a hidden deeper scientific knowledge in a book, full of scientific inaccuracies and contradictions, that we should pay attention to? Just a civil and curious enquiry, nothing antagonist meant I might add. It’s intriguing to understand thought processes.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@steriledial The ancient teachings = philosophy.
      The bible is a small part of ancient history passed down to us.
      God (thesis) is dual to the Christ Consciousness (anti-thesis) synthesizes the holy/spirit or the mind/soul.
      Christianity is actually based upon duality and not triality or trinity.
      The council of Nicaea in 325 AD was set up to answer the question, is the Christ consciousness the same substance as God or a different substance?
      Same is dual to different, homo is dual to hetero.
      Is it coincidence that the number 666 is also expressed in the standard model of physics? Was this just a lucky guess? Is this evidence of Alien contact or guidance thousands of years ago?
      Questions are dual to answers.
      Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato.
      Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      The intellectual mind/soul (concepts) is dual to the sensory mind/soul (percepts) -- the mind duality of Thomas Aquinas.
      Duality creates reality.

  • @leon_noel1687
    @leon_noel1687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Thank you, I´m just learning General Relativity, so some of the notation was familiar to me. This gave me such a high motivation to accelerate my learning!!!

    • @bastadtroll8922
      @bastadtroll8922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you can learn gr in like a few days. I mean i lgot the bulk of it in a few hours from youtube videos. What blows my mind is the schrodinger equation.

    • @mmmmukiltraining8894
      @mmmmukiltraining8894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bastadtroll8922 gr in a few days ? Better be joking

    • @humeanrgmnt7367
      @humeanrgmnt7367 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bastadtroll8922 Is it possible Einstein made an error, and science/math just hasn't caught it yet?

    • @rdmrdm25
      @rdmrdm25 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bastadtroll8922 Bro think he understands GR from YT vids LMAOOOOOOO

    • @bastadtroll8922
      @bastadtroll8922 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@rdmrdm25 listen thats not even the crazy part. I did it with my eyes half open whilst nodding off to sleep. I dont want to blow my own trumpet but i reclkon if i went to uni and studied this i would have invented the time machine by now

  • @penumbraman99
    @penumbraman99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You have put out some great videos. I feel this is one of your best!

  • @Kenoask
    @Kenoask 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of the best video of your channel. You realy simplify the topic. Thank You Sir. Great fan.

  • @Kiki-qh7xk
    @Kiki-qh7xk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best online class I found in youtube about the matter. Thank you.

  • @Rationalific
    @Rationalific 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is an amazing video! You really laid it all out there in the best way possible. Of course, I don't understand it and the equation still seems like an alien language to me, but I've been able to understand in a general sense some of the things that it describes. Mainstream TV thinks people don't want to knw about these types of things, so they never have shows about it, or if they do, they dumb it down to the point where it's just more unsatisfying entertainment than true education. That's why people are turning away. I hope your channel, others like it, and those you promote like Magellan TV and The Great Courses Plus thrive. If they do, it will show that many people actually care about learning instead of mindless "reality" shows and other garbage.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally get what you are saying!

    • @Rationalific
      @Rationalific 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh 👍

    • @SpotterVideo
      @SpotterVideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
      Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity.

  • @kostuek
    @kostuek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well, we figured out quite a lot, although mostly in a pure descriptive way. If you go ahead and ask those equations: "Why has the mass of an electron this exact very value?" there will be no answer. In fact, you need to take this value from an experiment and insert it in your calculations, or the whole thing will fall apart. So there is still quite a lot to learn, which is nice.

  • @m.alisiddiqui5802
    @m.alisiddiqui5802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    real hard work is done in explaining most difficult topic in simplified form

  • @ratbuddy4642
    @ratbuddy4642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thanks for these awesome shows. I am glad someone takes the time to explain stuff without making it seem like its a gentleman's only club. I mean that can go both ways. Ignorance can be on both sides of knowledge and no knowledge. On a side thought, we all do our best to describe the universe both myth, science fiction or hard empirical science. But, in the end its the one that has the best results that stands closer to truth. Everything has its merits myth and science fiction as well. I think with out a dynamic dose of both we are truly lost.

  • @manuelmartinez-gq4ij
    @manuelmartinez-gq4ij 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Great work, though I feel a bit overwhelmed by the math I usually watch these videos at least twice to try and get the general understanding. I’m generally an intuitive life form and can get lost in thought over what we have learned but really love expanding the mind over what we don’t. Thank you for your work it’s really appreciated!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @slimshady6597
      @slimshady6597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hyperduality2838 Religious nutjob. What has Yoda to do with the bs you're preaching here??

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      SlimShady Yoda doesn’t exist. That’s the connection

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slimshady6597 Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics!
      Energy is duality, duality is energy -- generalized duality.
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy or light (pure energy) is dual.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual.
      All energy is inherently dual.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Duality creates reality!
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      "The Force" = duality, the Jedi worship duality!
      Fear is dual to anger, anger is dual to hate, hate is dual to suffering -- the Yoda dualities.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vibaj16 You should listen to Yoda!
      Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics!
      Energy is duality, duality is energy -- generalized duality.
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy or light (pure energy) is dual.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual.
      All energy is inherently dual.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Duality creates reality!
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      "The Force" = duality, the Jedi worship duality!
      Fear is dual to anger, anger is dual to hate, hate is dual to suffering -- the Yoda dualities.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      You're mind/brain is creating dualities according to the metaphysic of Immanuel Kant et al.

  • @eduverse1948
    @eduverse1948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is called the Standard Model Equation. It explains 3 fundamental forces of the Universe, Strong Nuclear Force, Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetic Force, except Gravity. It describes properties like mass, charge and spin of elementary particles. Different terms in this equation represent different groups of particles. It has 5 sections. The first section describes the interactions between Gluons, the particles which hold Quarks together inside nucleons i.e protons and neutrons. Section 2 describes the interactions between W and Z bosons. Section 3 describes the interaction of particles with the Weak Force and the Higgs Field. Section 4 and 5 describe particle interactions with ghost particles. Ghost particles can make or break symmetries.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @greninjadark-cu3qt
      @greninjadark-cu3qt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about the phonon (quantum of lattice vibration) and plasmon (quantum of plasma oscillation). I think they are not fundamental forces and are "quasi" particles but still they are "elementary particles" cause they don't composed of smaller particles.

  • @CyberiusT
    @CyberiusT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm so happy that was the intuitive explanation.

  • @kaulickmitra6898
    @kaulickmitra6898 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazingly explained with such simplicity.

  • @zeropain9319
    @zeropain9319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Too complicated for me but good reference to come back to later as my understanding grows.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Krishikesh Wagh Orthodox is dual to heterodox.
      The soul is dual to the non-soul.
      Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!

    • @EKDupre
      @EKDupre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's the spirit!

  • @Just-A-Little-Magic
    @Just-A-Little-Magic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    There are only 3 professions that use imaginary numbers: mathematicians, quantum physicists and..... accountants ;)

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -- Einstein.
      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @alphalunamare
      @alphalunamare 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@hyperduality2838 Why do you assume that they are Dual? Doesn't Dualism imply that calculations based upon the one system imply and reflect calculations in the other? It is implicit that the dual systems are equivalent and are mere different representations of the same. So you are stating that Fermions and Bosons are just different views of the same underlying 'thing'. I am not sure that that is reasonable. Noether's theorem shows a correspondence between various Conservation Laws and Symmetry but this is patently not Dualism. You could say that Lebesgue Integration is the Dual of Measure Theory and be correct whilst being totally wrong if you were to suggest the same for Riemannian Integration. Simply put: Dualism is not duplicitous.

    • @alphalunamare
      @alphalunamare 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      maybe I meant ubiquitous?

    • @NatCo-Supremacist
      @NatCo-Supremacist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 duality is a stupid philosophical concept that wastes intellectual energy.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alphalunamare Symmetry leads to conservation, they are the same thing or equivalent or dual.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
      Integration is dual to differentiation.
      Union is dual to intersection.
      Homology is dual to co-homology.
      Positive is dual to negative.
      Points are dual to lines -- the principle of duality in geometry.
      The time domain is dual to the frequency domain -- Fourier analysis.
      Bosons & Fermions are made out of energy and energy = duality!
      The ancient teachings = philosophy.
      God (thesis) is dual to the Christ Consciousness (anti-thesis) synthesizes the holy/spirit or the mind/soul.
      Christianity is actually based upon duality and not triality or trinity.
      The council of Nicaea in 325 AD was set up to answer the question, is the Christ consciousness the same substance as God or a different substance?
      Same is dual to different, homo is dual to hetero.
      Is it coincidence that the number 666 is also expressed in the standard model of physics? Was this just a lucky guess? Is this evidence of Alien contact or guidance thousands of years ago?
      Questions are dual to answers.
      Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato.
      Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      The intellectual mind/soul (concepts) is dual to the sensory mind/soul (percepts) -- the mind duality of Thomas Aquinas.
      Duality creates reality.

  • @meahoola
    @meahoola 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, ever since I first saw that equation I was waiting for THIS explanation.
    . ..and in the final presentation of the Lagrangian, the second term has both a gamma and a slash, that's too much.

  • @JarodM
    @JarodM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video of a complex subject, my friend~

  • @mayankbhaisora2699
    @mayankbhaisora2699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    You explain everything very well but I still couldn’t understand it 😂

    • @stfu_trash95
      @stfu_trash95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Same.. I watched 10 minutes and 39 seconds only to realize how stupid I am

    • @mayankbhaisora2699
      @mayankbhaisora2699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@stfu_trash95 yeah bro... same feelings... 🤯overwhelmed

    • @valentinmalinov8424
      @valentinmalinov8424 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This is because there is a separate explanation for each phenomenon, but all these explanations are not compatible. There is a new book, which is ticking all the boxes of the requirements for the needed Theory - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

    • @stfu_trash95
      @stfu_trash95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@valentinmalinov8424 good to know I'll definitely give this book a go!!!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @vedantsridhar8378
    @vedantsridhar8378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Am I the only one who thought Arvin Ash was going to introduce Magellan Tv at 1:59 when he said "Before we get into the math........". Great video Arvin Ash, this fantastic idea of a theory of everything is one of the reasons why I want to become a physicist in the future.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      haha...I thought that's what some people might think. I only realized it after I cut the video. I bet you're not the only one.

    • @Bobbias
      @Bobbias 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArvinAsh I didn't even think about it, but as soon as I saw the comment I realized a lot of people probably would lol

  • @test-193
    @test-193 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent summary. Thank you.

  • @anthonyzavala7173
    @anthonyzavala7173 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If I knew more about the actual terms then I believe I would have definitely understood this due to how good the explanation was.

  • @labhsinghsaini3352
    @labhsinghsaini3352 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful explanation of beautiful equation.

  • @yasir4511
    @yasir4511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You brilliantly sum up in a short video. Remarkable also it boosted my interest to know more! Thanks

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can recommend Sean Carrolls playlist "The Biggest Ideas in the Universe": th-cam.com/play/PLrxfgDEc2NxZJcWcrxH3jyjUUrJlnoyzX.html

  • @frenzyneutrino1766
    @frenzyneutrino1766 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A wonderful and beautifully explained video and I would like to point out that the term which gives coupling of force particles with matter particle @5:10 over there it should be just D instead of D dagger .

  • @jworldwide904
    @jworldwide904 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent presentation! Thank you!

  • @jacksondick2317
    @jacksondick2317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I am interested and shocked, as a college student, I think I have to understang these equations one day.

  • @Earwaxfire909
    @Earwaxfire909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Beautifully inspiring and depressing. Great work!

  • @mada_nunes
    @mada_nunes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So beautiful! And the song gave a magical touch.

  • @samsonau8205
    @samsonau8205 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I will never have the math skills to understand this, but these visualizations help me ground all the ideas involved and try to pick out errors/misunderstandings/misinformation when I listen to other videos or discussions. My strength is bio and chem, with a smattering of physics at the university level. Today, add on logic/programming. What I do is listen for consistencies between different video or scientific presenters and hope they don't overstate things by highlighting the limits and identifying where we really are in research. Avrin Ash does a pretty good job of that in a fairly serious tone. I do enjoy NDT as well, but some of the humorous stuff detracts from me trying to dive deeper as he aims more at Joe-public rather than the enthusiasts or experts in other non-physics fields.

  • @rmehta54
    @rmehta54 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Wow! You explained it so beautifully. I wish I had a teacher like you before I decided to drop physics. And now I wish there are more teachers like you so others can advance our knowledge. Thanks much Arvin.

  • @maysampkh4242
    @maysampkh4242 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fantastic job Arvin, nice videos... thanks for the great work.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What are you, like 5yr old?

    • @vedantsridhar8378
      @vedantsridhar8378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226 what did Maysam say that only a five year old would say? He or she was just giving a compliment to Arvin Ash, since this video is pretty interesting and simplified

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vedantsridhar8378 sorry but that is a pointless waste of entropy.

    • @vedantsridhar8378
      @vedantsridhar8378 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226 entropy, hmmmm.

  • @TonyFDiego
    @TonyFDiego 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Simply an awesome explanation of our current understanding of the universe and in such a way that non-physicists and physicists alike can recognize and appreciate.

    • @adisuyash
      @adisuyash 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely not non-physicist 💀

  • @steriledial
    @steriledial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is excellent.
    Thank you Arvin!

  • @vishekh
    @vishekh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The best 16 minutes of my day.

  • @marcosfreijeiro8763
    @marcosfreijeiro8763 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent video and great content👍🏻

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you enjoyed it

  • @conrmckocoa9352
    @conrmckocoa9352 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the very interesting content. Science communicators are very much needed today

  • @jareknowak8712
    @jareknowak8712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perfect video, as usual.
    It confirms my unprofessional belief, that the string theory is either not a solution, or there is still some long bridge that leads to it, a bridge made of many different boards.
    Thank You Arvin!

  • @awolgeordie9926
    @awolgeordie9926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Freaking amazing presentation. Thank you.

  • @shayangfkk7948
    @shayangfkk7948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Nice , you wrote the gamma matrices and used the slash notation in the fermion dynamic term .

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You paid very good attention, yes that indeed is a typo :-) the universe would however be much easier mathematically with this typo ;)

    • @nemethdaniel6384
      @nemethdaniel6384 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheOnlineBlackboard would it? A random index sticking out would rather complicate it. This "syntacs error" would give an index to the Lagrangian. :D

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nemethdaniel6384 Ahhh yeah. So in terms of indexes it would be fatal. But I was more thinking of the fact that you would just have two gamma matrices, and they would contract to one thus giving you a scalar interaction :) Thus, in this way it's simpler.
      You guys are so smart, do you also have a degree in physics? :D

    • @nemethdaniel6384
      @nemethdaniel6384 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheOnlineBlackboard I'm doing my PhD, my topic is Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) quantum gravity! :)

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nemethdaniel6384 Cool :-) I'm working on DM via the Higgs sector, and in particular on models which would fix the hierarchy problem and issues with the EWPT such that we get the right conditions for baryonic asymmetry :)

  • @issamelias1747
    @issamelias1747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lovely & interesting, but incomprehensible for me, since I‘m a medical Dr. with a major in Philosophy. This shows me how complicated the world of existence is, with each human being having a part in deciphering the wonder of existence, & by finally carrying all parts of science together to make a coherent whole - & unified, & by saying all, I really mean all. - quantum physics, cosmology, mathematics , geometry ( Eucledian & non), chemistry, medicine, biology, philosophy, ....... & all other sciences in existence. But would us make more happy, would that knowledge bring us to other spheres or heights, & if so, what then. Still thank you for that clip which shows me my own ignorance, or as a philosopher once said „ I know that I do not know „ Thank you. ❤️

  • @rajaa.i9713
    @rajaa.i9713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Arvin! Great video as usual! What if photons can interact with each other? Say like, can they exchange information when the pass through each other? Even if it is possible, does it hold any significance?

  • @khushi3958
    @khushi3958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wooooowwwwww! Arvin, this is amazing, hey kudos to you and ur team, I totally am amazed, you are awesome 😍😍😍👏👏👏👏👏

  • @thomasposivy8003
    @thomasposivy8003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Liked it, explained the math really well 🙂

  • @Alex-lk7qy
    @Alex-lk7qy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great informative video. Thank you

  • @LynxBlackWind
    @LynxBlackWind 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey, regarding handedness - does that mean that moving particle can have spin only parallel to motion vector? I.e. If moving along with X axis to the right, it can only have spin left or right but on u or down or between? Or if it has some measured spin in Y direction while moving with X,how do we tell if it's left or right handed?

  • @Sigmaairav
    @Sigmaairav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    what if the fabric of spacetime is a quantum field like the higgs, in which all gravitational effects could be explained? What if gravity wasn't actually a force so much as it was the effect of spacetime curving in the presence of mass?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It probably is the latter, but the quantum theory behind it is missing.

    • @ozzymandius666
      @ozzymandius666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Things like photons and gluons, which do not couple to the Higgs field, also have gravity.

    • @humeanrgmnt7367
      @humeanrgmnt7367 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ozzymandius666 What's gravity, and can you demonstrate your certainty?

  • @aryanbotre4949
    @aryanbotre4949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The speciality of his videos is that they answer a huge question simply and leave you with ten new questions!

  • @woufff_
    @woufff_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great, well explained, thank you Sir!

  • @FunkyLoiso
    @FunkyLoiso 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm interested in how physicists "feel" about standard model. For me it seems overly complicated, it's hard to believe, that this is the simplest description of reality. Lots of different particles, that do and do not interact with each other, some of which have antiparticles, the interactions depend on whether the particle spins to the right of to the left.. Just rules on rules on rules, like we are describing natural language and not basic reality, that spontaneously exists.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most physicists will tell you that it is the best and most accurate model of the universe we have ever hand.

  • @aeixo2533
    @aeixo2533 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your presentation is some of the best on youtube bro!

  • @Name-js5uq
    @Name-js5uq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Thank you for all that hard work

  • @mehmetali4626
    @mehmetali4626 ปีที่แล้ว

    i added this video my playlist. Literally So uniqu video. Perfect explained.

  • @neil6477
    @neil6477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoyed the video immensely - thanks for your work Arvin. A couple of things struck me whilst watching; what are the fields made of and how do they originate? Are the various fields formed from a more basic field which, somehow, differentiates into the ones you spoke of? Could there be more fields which give rise to 'events' of which we are currently unaware? Are the feilds limited to the 'normal' spacetime that we know of or could they be multidimensional? Don't worry not expecting defintive answers (!) but just wondering about the fields since they are clearly the source of everything we know of.

    • @das_it_mane
      @das_it_mane 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is where my brain goes to as well. My assumption is that the universe is a connected lattice. Each point vibrates and communicates with other points based on its vibrations. The way they vibrate gives rise to what is in the fields. And gravity is simply the lattice points being pulled inward by oscillations, accumulated over many points to give us a curved spacetime and illusion of a force. I'm not a physicist so I could be way off but I just think if one were creating a simulation from scratch that resembles a universe that begins from simplicity, then you don't want to be too complicated at the base level. And what could be simpler than what I described. Perhaps maybe Wolfram's game of life rule type theory but that would require further explanations of how the rule itself comes about so I'm not sure that it is actually simpler. Either way, I hope we discover these answers within our lifetimes.

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      he said the fields are fundamental. It possible to consider 1 quark field that has 6 complex dimensions (u, d, s, c, b, t), and same for the leptons. Maybe they can be unified into a 12D leptonic field. Likewise for the vector bosons. It's been done with the photon and the Z, being mixtures of the B and W0. If they unify with the gluons, then it's one field with many dimensions...just not spatial dimensions. Getting the leptons and bosons into 1 field requires supersymmetry.

    • @neil6477
      @neil6477 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrDeuteron OK. Tx for your reply.

  • @SirChocula
    @SirChocula 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Like PBS-Spacetime, I come to this channel every now and then to humble myself in how little I actually know :)

    • @darrenmarney8577
      @darrenmarney8577 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Potentially Sir 😃 Your comment is the same path that i followed 🤣 Educational interaction opportunities of understanding & more questions 🤔

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why do you feel you have to write this in the comments then. Just shut up and go back into your hole. What a waste of entropy

  • @tericklePlayer
    @tericklePlayer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Almost is the most accurate words in the title. We knows very well that the theory of everything is strongly contested

    • @moddquad8362
      @moddquad8362 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I contest the word 'almost' as 85% of the universe is dark matter/energy. It's hard to claim a theory of everything when it only explains 15% of the universe.

  • @davidramsey2566
    @davidramsey2566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm glad I found this today. "Theory of almost everything." LOL What a chuckle. But it's kind of cute. Like your puppy dog all of the sudden learning to talk and then proceeding to tell you about the fundamental nature of reality! (Still, I have to admit the dog's theory can predict where all the bones are buried in the yard. Maybe a theory of everything isn't so far away.)

  • @vicioustide
    @vicioustide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Discoveries to unveil: Electron is made of the same components of a Proton, just smaller, this is why a Neutron splits into a Proton and an Electron. Also, a photon is an energized electron moving near the speed of light by means of a rotating triple layered braided wave guide with the outer layer being whichever medium the photon is traveling through. Typically it traverses through our visible universe of energy with a normal coating like outer wave layer, but this wave coating changes to a dark energy when entering a black hole (or a dark matter star's medium of space). Also, in the equations equate "Strong Nuclear Force " to a Gravity B force that resides in the proton neutron vaccinity until it is amplified as it resides on the EM spectrum, with gravity A force as the normally very weak force found every where else.

  • @adamraiyan
    @adamraiyan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    You don't know how much I waited for your uploads.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude no one cares! Why you waste entropy here? Just go bacl into your hole

  • @unkleful
    @unkleful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    High praise to this video.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @bigbigblast
    @bigbigblast 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whenever Arvin says "Right now," and he points his finger I can't help but smile too.
    Then I feel like I'm fastening this invisible seat belt 'coz we're goin' places, baby.

  • @brethamilton3603
    @brethamilton3603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was awesome , thx .now i understand more about those crazy looking symbols and what they r pertaining to. thank you arvin more please

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You could just grab and read a textbook you know...

  • @sticksimulated
    @sticksimulated 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    this is next level

  • @theklaus7436
    @theklaus7436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Frankly the math is beyond me- but I think I learn how to picture some of it in my mind. And this is due to all these science channels. But this so interesting and a true gift especially for the young people! And the impact can’t be overstated! 😊🎸

  • @vivekpatel3752
    @vivekpatel3752 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I m an experimental physicist and will submi my thesis soon. We will have a theoretical physicist who is famous for asking to explain the SML .. thank you very much for this. It reduces all the effort I need to make to learn this

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Best of luck!

  • @funkey3692
    @funkey3692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos I have more understanding of the universe.
    Anyway can you explane if the Rain Clouds traveling as the speed of the Earth? Tks

  • @MrElvis1971
    @MrElvis1971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I struggle with the concept of renormalisation. Would like a video on it.

    • @tiny_toilet
      @tiny_toilet 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I struggle with pre-renormalization, everything that comes before renormalization. Oh, also post-renormalization. And post-modernism, too. Know what? Better to just go ahead and cover it all, please.

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tiny_toilet you forgot pre-mature

    • @Bobbias
      @Bobbias 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, I'd love a good explanation of renormalization.

    • @NatCo-Supremacist
      @NatCo-Supremacist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I find it funny whenever people who "love science" never apply such theories on people where they accurately explain populace phenomena .

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NatCo-Supremacist It is a lot easier to attack and criticise than to explain. It's a lot easier to call someone stupid than to educate them. It is just human nature and an efficient use of our internal resources. It is nothing special or unique and often we as humans gamify it and turn it into bullying.

  • @Gaurav-um4oh
    @Gaurav-um4oh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Although i didn't get a single point i watched this video till the end and i felt like i was watching this sitting inside a warp drive travelling in another world of higher dimension at a speed faster than the light . Oh god

  • @manaoharsam4211
    @manaoharsam4211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did a very good job. Maybe you should offer a course in Quantum field theory.

  • @jeancorriveau8686
    @jeancorriveau8686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good explanation of the imaginary number 'i'. Indeed, that number must not end up in the final physical result. Comes to mind Minkowski 4-space equation usually expressed as ds2 = (icdt)2 + dx2 + dy2 + dz2
    dx, dy and dz can't be real since there exists no absolute frame of reference. So, the number 'i' should be present. Let's do that by multiplying by -1:
    -ds2 = -(icdt)2 - dx2 - dy2 - dz2
    that is
    -ds2 = -(icdt)2 + (idx)2 + (idy)2 + (idz)2
    or
    -ds2 = (cdt)2 + (idx)2 + (idy)2 + (idz)2
    Time is now real as it must be. Time is equivalent to energy. Time goes by only with energy. The left-hand side -ds2 causes concern. It's like (ids)2. This is supposed to represent the space-time distance, an absolute value. However, the presence of 'i' means that it's not physical. So, we have time (energy) on the right side, clearly physical, but the left side is nonphysical. Minkowski's equation doesn't express reality, then. So, General relativity doesn't either. I've seen videos that claim that time causes gravitation. If by time is meant the one in Minkowski's equation, then GR has no physical reality.

  • @joeye7518
    @joeye7518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I am so glad this channel randomly popped up. Sometimes that algorithm works out.

  • @HmlsDarkOps
    @HmlsDarkOps 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The fact that we have gotten this far is crazy enough.

    • @MrKydaman
      @MrKydaman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, but we could be barely scratching the surface.

    • @spinor
      @spinor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know, I feel people don't appreciate just how incredible it is that we've been able to figure out what we have. We've formulated extraordinarily accurate descriptions of the universe from the scale of subatomic particles to the entire universe, all just by tinkering, observing, and thinking really hard. We certainly haven't got it all figured out, and maybe most of what's out there is yet to be uncovered, but the progress we have made is truly awe-inspiring.

  • @richardventus1875
    @richardventus1875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Arvin - thanks, great video. Unfortunately, as you acknowledge, the standard model is a bit like describing a whole elephant when you've got a piece of its tusk: it doesn't include gravity and only accounts for 5% of the observable universe. I wonder if physicists will ever be able to create an equation which really does cover 'everything'.

  • @tasnimmannan7649
    @tasnimmannan7649 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And I have saw some of your videos that are very well explained!

    • @tasnimmannan7649
      @tasnimmannan7649 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you please make regarding Economics,Finance or Accounting science?

  • @motif123456
    @motif123456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What an amazing explanation of the beaity of the universe...had i had seen this in my early adulthood,I would have definitely chosen physics

    • @crystalgiddens7276
      @crystalgiddens7276 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you have a sickness

    • @greymatter5188
      @greymatter5188 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yo what drugs you smokin`? physics is a nightmare don't do it

  • @ayubsherif5898
    @ayubsherif5898 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The standard model Lagrangian equation is a piece of art. Great video as always

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How did you know it was a great video?

    • @danielbavisetti8731
      @danielbavisetti8731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrElvis1971 He has a membership.
      So he has early access to videos of this channel.

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielbavisetti8731 oh

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation of Physics without Gravity, metastable proportioning probability resonancs. If sufficient density-intensity of orbital-orbits form relative Timing-spacing Condensate, this is observable by resonance through the Singularity Apature Trigonometric positioning holographic phenomenon, and resolves according to tuned focus.., receeding in macro-micro perspective exclusion to the Singularity positioning vanishing point-zero-infinity i-reflection containment. Ie if the Universe appears in this projection-drawing exploded view, Gravity is "unbonding" via chaotic, and therefore not measurable, "Quantum Uncertainty" darkness, the same as emptiness of Space-time.
    So this is the "what" physical manifestation is composed of/in sensory realisation. Quantum-fields are left incomprehensible by exclusion of Time duration timing.
    Which is "How" it is composed by time-timing projection-drawing holographic embedding, ..of What you think you see.., QM-TIME wave-particle Modulation Mechanism Singularity positioning Mathematics, in formations such as the properties of Fluxions suggested by Newton in his purified maths, CalculusCamera Obscura Optics demonstrations. Newtonian Gravity is left unexplored, but the process of chemistry in later years demonstrated bonding-antibonding resonance that is quite sufficient in Completeness.
    And "Why" is the Infinity/Eternity here-now-forever Superspin self-defining Modulation positioning, e-Pi-i function cause-effect of Quantum Logic.
    Which implies Everything Theory is Temporal Logarithmic Superspin Condensates in/of Quantum-fields.
    A Math-Physics practitioner with 10k hrs experienced Intuition might link Fluxions and Higgs Bosons in a Glossary of Terms..
    Amateurs are, with respect, unqualified to Comment beyond Feynman type guessing. Time is Time, e-Pi-i sync-duration connectivity etc.., Everything. To suggest leaving out this Principle is ineffective.

  • @vitr1916
    @vitr1916 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a good stuffs!!! It is really interesting things to know. I hope these discoveries really are found from lab and test. Understanding this equation and observing those fields are interacting to each other in different circumstances and conditions, definitely will be keys for understanding the universes.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @vitr1916
      @vitr1916 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 In my opinion, today scientist still don't understand all about energy. Energy may be one of keys for understanding universe I think. You can see it from big bang theory, black holes, asteroids can hit anything in space even there is and an existing of dark mater, and human activities. The level of consuming energy just is scaling up to activities of universe. The equation above is a sum of energy theories from the past. They may have more in future.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vitr1916 Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Gravitational energy:- potential energy is dual to kinetic, gravitational energy is dual.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
      Curvature and hence gravitation is dual.
      Electro-magnetic energy:- Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, photons or pure energy are dual.
      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem or wave/particle quantum duality.
      All energy is dual in physics!
      The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics!
      Energy is measure in Joules (duals, Jewels).
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @vitr1916
      @vitr1916 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 Thank you for the information. Do you ever see the strong waves from the ocean below about 10' - 15'? I saw it from a landscape view tube about classical music. It is really interesting to see, the water molecules connecting as quantum loops. I just wonder if I can drop mass with string on it and see what happening.

  • @edgarbandoy6646
    @edgarbandoy6646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This the real deal. Thank God and all scientists collaborated to make this possible

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 I respect your disrespect. Nice sarcasm btw

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 You don't even know me personally. But again I respect your disrespect.

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 even Ash this channel tackles about this subject and you just conclude without any scientific reasons. Maybe you are not for this channel. 😆

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 th-cam.com/video/sm0Ul-Ym8Ys/w-d-xo.html watch this smart guy

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 Thanks God for your existence

  • @TuAFFalcon
    @TuAFFalcon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Yeah, my head exploded... Thanks Arvin!

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How old are you? Like 5?

    • @TuAFFalcon
      @TuAFFalcon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226Not understanding the theory of everything in full means you have the intelligence of a 5 year old? So that is what 99% of the worlds population?
      Instead of trolling here why don't you go get a job and maybe a life.

  • @hrishibora3072
    @hrishibora3072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    beautifully explained..!!!
    😍

  • @BetzalelMC
    @BetzalelMC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Arvin, just wondering if you saw the JRE w/Weinstein where he ‘tries’ to drop a GUT and, well the episode drops the ball to say the least, but he did say he ‘figured it [all] out’... anywho, I’m wondering if you can review his paper and make a video to prove/disprove/critique his position? I know that’s a super big ask, but I’m not sure who or where else to ask... If my memory serves me correctly, I believe it’s named Geometric Unity.
    PS love your content, keep up fantastic work! Thanks!

  • @AchwaqKhalid
    @AchwaqKhalid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Arwin! You need a graphic animator/illustrator in your team for more visual easy to digest goodness ⚛

  • @joegillian314
    @joegillian314 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "...psi dagger..."
    lol, you know what this sounds like, right? (this equation includes psychic powers 😂😂😂)

    • @michaelsmusic3532
      @michaelsmusic3532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, this proves ESP, time travel, ect

    • @TheoEvian
      @TheoEvian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The funny thing is that if I am not mistaken that letter was "phi" :D

  • @RPGmodsFan
    @RPGmodsFan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What equation would you need to solve to get the Standard Model Lagrangian Equation? Could it give insight into what Dark Matter and Dark Energy are?
    For his Physics Thesis, Hugh Everett derived the equation you would need to solve to get the Schrödinger Equation. Its interpretation was "mind boggling".

  • @ryantennyson7562
    @ryantennyson7562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Mr Ash, excellent.

  • @tonywells6990
    @tonywells6990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks, you just confirmed that I understood the lagrangian perfectly as something I cannot grasp!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @tonywells6990
      @tonywells6990 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 I actually meant I couldn't grasp all the math.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonywells6990 The equations of motion (Lagrangian) minimize the action in quantum mechanics and maximize reality! The equations of motion are literally optimized predictions or syntropic.
      Convex (convergence, syntropy) is dual to concave (divergence, entropy).
      Homotopic equivalence = duality.
      Union is dual to intersection.
      Integration is dual to differentiation.
      Injective is dual to bijective synthesizes bi-jective or isomorphism.
      Positive is dual to negative.
      Homology is dual to co-homology.
      Y = X.
      Y is equal to X. Y is the same, similar, equivalent or dual to X. Y is dual to X.
      All mathematical equations in physics and mathematics are dualities.
      The Lagrangian is a mathematical tool which makes optimized predictions (syntropy).
      Duality creates reality!

    • @tonywells6990
      @tonywells6990 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 Actually, the math all makes sense now, but thanks!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonywells6990 Noumenal (rational, analytic) is dual to phenomenal (empirical, synthetic) -- Immanuel Kant.
      Mathematics is analytical thinking or transcendental logic (noumenal).
      Transcendental logic (concepts) is dual to transcendental aesthetic (sensory percepts) -- Immanuel Kant.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      Here is a video you can watch about non-dualism:-
      th-cam.com/video/dWLd9y1MG4c/w-d-xo.html

  • @DarkLord-mf7oi
    @DarkLord-mf7oi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes, I finally understand those equations thanks to you, you are a true science kind-hearted hard-working man,
    I respect you, sir!
    Although I am still 14 years old,i can use this knowledge to impress my teachers, lol
    Thank you so much, sir!!

  • @Emap202
    @Emap202 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, loved it! Just a note: I think you meant "phi and phi dagger" at 9:56, not "psi and psi dagger".

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes indeed, my mistake. Thanks.

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good explanation. Thanks