Most people will run it with a desktop. Works better than I expected and the two reservations I have about it is first, some repos don’t point correctly to the devel branch - I don’t know why, its just a warning and doesn’t affect anything and hopefully the developers will come out with a fix for the issue and the second is the Pacstall package manager doesn’t have a lot of packages and I think here is a case of fixing a problem that doesn’t need to be fixed since Nala and Synaptic/Muon package manager will pull in thousands of packages that are already present in Ubuntu itself for whatever application you might want on your system. As a set and forget it Ubuntu version of Arch, it means you never have to upgrade from LTS point version to LTS point version like in mainstream Ubtuntu. For many people, that kind of makes life easier having the stability of Ubuntu with the ability to stay current like you to do on Arch. The flavour needs a lot more work before it can be accepted as an official flavour of the Ubuntu community but the essentials are already here, it just needs to get to where it needs to be and that will take time. On the whole, I really like it.
Yup, it's really nice. Pacstall really lacks packages, but it is nice if you want to build something yourself and have corresponding deb package as pacstripts are pretty easy to create. The apt warnings are expected as far as I know, as we point to devel release, but the actual release name repo returns is the release name of whatever is currently in development. So, it's safe to ignore and cannot really be fixed.
Most people will run it with a desktop. Works better than I expected and the two reservations I have about it is first, some repos don’t point correctly to the devel branch - I don’t know why, its just a warning and doesn’t affect anything and hopefully the developers will come out with a fix for the issue and the second is the Pacstall package manager doesn’t have a lot of packages and I think here is a case of fixing a problem that doesn’t need to be fixed since Nala and Synaptic/Muon package manager will pull in thousands of packages that are already present in Ubuntu itself for whatever application you might want on your system. As a set and forget it Ubuntu version of Arch, it means you never have to upgrade from LTS point version to LTS point version like in mainstream Ubtuntu. For many people, that kind of makes life easier having the stability of Ubuntu with the ability to stay current like you to do on Arch. The flavour needs a lot more work before it can be accepted as an official flavour of the Ubuntu community but the essentials are already here, it just needs to get to where it needs to be and that will take time. On the whole, I really like it.
Yup, it's really nice. Pacstall really lacks packages, but it is nice if you want to build something yourself and have corresponding deb package as pacstripts are pretty easy to create.
The apt warnings are expected as far as I know, as we point to devel release, but the actual release name repo returns is the release name of whatever is currently in development. So, it's safe to ignore and cannot really be fixed.