Its cause its not had a game about it, and of course the beginning being one of the most important parts of any story, means that if the writers keep not showing us what happened, they get way more theorizing from the community than if they didnt show, say, the middle of the story.
@@jc_art_ I personally don’t think it doesn’t need a game. I feel the specifics in the origin isn’t important for the overall story. We know Henry and William (aka, Aubergine Man) were co-owners of Faz Ent Inc. FredBear’s was one of the original restaurants for them. Just going off by games 1-7, not counting games not made by Scott, pretty much after 7.
@@azimuddin1890This is fair but.. it would be pretty cool to see how things were before it all went to shit. I personally would love a Fredbears game but.. I do wonder how it would work out ngl. Especially since I guess it’s be kinda to have an origins game after 1-6 concluded lol. But I’d enjoy it and it can just be it’s own thing. It highly depends how they go about it though. Maybe it’d be better as an animated series ngl. 🤔
Henry strikes me as the kinda guy to keep the original fredbears stuffed and turned into his coffee table, while Afton would see this as an insult and then proceed to retrofit it's corpse with machinery and endopieces
The cutout was more likely for the "carnival" that was hinted at in some unused level geometry for the cave escape. But this is just as intriguing since it ties back to that horrific poster in the alley in FFPS with the scary clown and real live bear performer. So it wasn't the diner that existed in the 70s, but a carnival starring a real live trained bear named Fredbear that was totally safe and didn't harm anyone nope no sir. You know, two of the mascot costumes in mimic's room were a lion and an elephant, both being typical circus animals. I'm seeing a pattern here, that the mascot costumes were for this carnival and Grimic was a part of that. Yeah I'm just gonna keep calling it Grimic, fight me.
I REALLY like this theory but there is one major problem with it. And it's the fact that the Spring Bonnie character was named after the springlock suits. Meaning the suits have to have been created before Spring Bonnie was given his name. The only workaround I can think of is that Spring Bonnie was originally just named "Bonnie."
Great theory! Curious on one point. The supply closet bonnie looks different to the spring bonnie we see in the fnaf4 purple guy easter egg. The easter egg spring bonnie more closely resembles the fruity maze spring bonnie. This would mean the spring bonnie at fredbears and freddys were the same or similar, but they were different to the original glitchtrap bonnie. I think this makes phone guy’s line inaccurate still, since that original bonnie would have been discontinued.
or it could just be that the different angle in fnaf 4 makes it look different. If the Springbonnie head in the supply closet at fredbears wasn't the same as the Springbonnie design FOR Fredbear's that doesn't make sense, especially considering the Fredbear in the closet looks the same. So yeah, probably just the angle where its facing it
@@ImpulseEvan37 fair point on the angle! imo it still looks too different, but it is also pixel graphics so 🤷♂️ I have heard theories in the past that the supply closet head was some sort of prototype for spring bonnie, so I was kinda going off that. I think that still works with the idea of glitchtrap being the og bonnie, and at some point they changed the design after springlocks were introduced.
Good mini theory! It could be very likely that they used costumes before animatronics was an opinion for the restaurant. I had actually been looking into what the earliest chuck-e-cheese animatronic were, just to see if there was anything close to the 70s and they are 1978 but feels more close to 80s then 70s... But found out Disney has had them since 1963, so we could probably still see something if they go this route, which I really hope!
Their might be a William primarily owned location before he joined up with Henry and he likely used normal mascot suits like Game Theory's ultimate timeline says, the stuff after part 2 is questionable
Quick question, if you make a prequel Fnaf game which time would you put it in? I would want one that’s set during the MCI (maybe you could play as the MC and it can go into there personality and how they were killed)
one question how??? How could you have known of this before Scott even made the story? Scott didn't even know The first five nights at Freddy's game was intended to be his last game If it wasn't successful, he would have quit game development Of course we all know how it played out. During the time of the first game. I find it inconceivable that he would make the idea of the spring lock suits and Fred bear's family Diner So I really don't believe you. Why am I wasting my time making this comment?
The first suits were hand sewn. Then a second series was created,the springlocks which also included the fun times from FNAF 4 sister location. Then the next generation was after the springlocks were discontinued which included the classics from FNAF1.
there's at least 2 locations to visit: The carnival (most likely Fredbear singing show and second location of Sister's location) and Fredbear's family dinner (that we already saw back in Ruin with the old costumes) Also, in the closet room where the oldest costumes are i noticed at least 7 (or 6) closets but the point is i think these are the OG costumes but i'm not sure if those belongs to Bonnie (because that would be William's) Freddy and Foxy, Chica couldn't be part of the group because that was Henry's creation or other creations or basically spare costumes from the others since Mimic took the rest in order to make its own
honestly that's kinda what i've been thinking like everyone overlooking that the fnaf 1 animatronics were around in the 70's and not created in the 80's
While I don't dislike going back in time because that would provide answers, and it doesn't put us god knows how many years into the future now... this brings a new set of issues. Throwing the plot another decade into the past with Henry and William still being owner/founding figures of the franchise keeps making them older. A small diner that lasted a couple years is one thing, but another 10 years? Specially now that some people are suggesting that Henry didn't die in FNAF 6 and might still be around.
I don't like how spring-lock suits are portrayed as something that slowly unlocks as that make no sense when compared to how spring-locks work in real life. A good example of a real life spring-lock would be the retractable pen or 'click pen' that you (probably) have, your click pen can't slowly unlock and have the tip slowly come back in? No, (not with out some outside force any way) clicking the pen or if it the pen goes through it's own spring-lock failure the tip will almost instantly retract or extend.
Hey impulse I have something to share there’s a game in ruin called fredbears nomnombits it uses a 8 bit fredbear from fnaf 4 it makes me think fnaf 4s mini game is apart of “ fazbeara false “ past
I brought this up a long time ago, but the timeline in "The Mimic" puts that story at 1979 the latest. If you don't treat Edwin as a parallel to Henry, then Freadbears was already established by the original owners and Edwin was outfitting the new "Friends" of "Fredbear and Friends", presumably based on designs. This includes some other mascots. It's been inferred that only Henry could make the springlocks, but making an Endo is not exclusive. Freddy Fazbear's Pizza is established in1983 (known by the coin). Because of a "resolved" date of 2035 (by Fuhnaff), Edwin's age in "The Storyteller" was used to reverse engineer the dates, but the dates are laid out in "The Mimic". This helps strengthen your theory. Good vid.
While I appreciate you trying to provide extra evidence for the theory, this simply isn't true. Nothing about the Mimic story places it in the 70s at all. In fact, it absolutely CANNOT be in the 70s because it mentions the 70s being in the past. Nothing definitively implies Security Breach is in 2035 either, and that year doesn't work at all with the Mimic timeline as the storyteller is soon after the pizzaplex opens and takes place 40 years after the mimic. If The Mimic took place any earlier than 1984, that wouldn't work as fnaf 6 is in 2023 and the pizzaplex obviously opens after fnaf 6. The only year prior to 2035 that matches security Breach's calendar is 2029, and since the faz life magazines are quarterly and theres 19 of them, the pizzaplex would've opened just under 5 years before security breach placing the opening in 2024, which is after fnaf 6 and allows the mimic to be in 1984, where Edwin is likely just building the animatronics for some of the many Freddy Fazbear's Pizza Locations
@@ImpulseEvan37 Respectfully, it may very well be true. There are plenty of points to cross reference in the Mimic story. For examply, he started his company in the early 70s and purchased the Lace Factory to house his new business. At the same time, he and his wife acquired the Queen Anne Mansion. This means they bought it in the early 70s as well and this story only takes place 5 years after they purchased the building, because when they moved in, Fiona was already pregnant. Furthermore, he already had a job he loved and a wife before he had a son. During this story it states that for the past year and a half, Edwin has worked for Fazbear Entertainment because his business was short lived and failed due to him having to raise David by himself. I encourage you to go through it once more.
It isn't specified that the lace factory was purchased right when Edwin started his business. You're able to start a business while you're still a minor (hell, before summer break my business teacher encouraged us to start our own lol) and its said that Edwin was into technical stuff all the way back in his childhood. It is entirely possible that he started the business as a teenager but that it hadn't gotten successful until the vacuum when he was in college and that was when he bought the factory. The only relation the purchasing of the lace factory has to the TIME the business started is that it was said that it was to house his new business, but technically "new" doesn't have to mean it was started just then. While the business started when he was a lot younger, it's likely that since it only started getting successful in his college days that that was when he bought the factory. If this ISN'T the case, then the timeline just doesn't add up at all, as whether tales is in the games timeline or not, FNaF 6's events still happened since the pizza place is under the pizzaplex, and fnaf 6 was in 2023, so if the pizzaplex opened in 2019, then the timeline is fractured
@@ImpulseEvan37 it’s specified that he bought the factory to “house his new business” so unless “new” spans over the course of long periods of time, I think it infers that it was right when he started it. He used the money he had made during college thanks to the robot vacuum cleaner. It’s also not possible that he started his business as a teenager as it is also specified that he “started his business right out of school.” (Pg 148) I understand what you’re saying about the pizzaplex, but going by the latest information, those dates get drawn into questioning anyway.
I like the theory only thing wich doesnt make sense is that Afton "repaired" himself. If he really repaired himself than he would have both arms dont you think? I mean it would explain the diffrent look but it wouldnt make much sense. I would be intrested to hear why Scott made Scraptrap look the way that he did instead of using springtrap and but the same damage on him that he put on scraptrap( missing arm, uper head showing etc.)
@@ImpulseEvan37 Doesnt it say it’s a digital only character. Perhaps SpringBonnieMan suit (I’m calling it that, let’s not focus on it) is a digital suit based off of it, not that it actually exist.
Hi you remember what phone guy in Fnaf 1 said about 20 years and I did candour to 1973+20= 1993 or 1983+20=2003. Fredbear family diner was made in 1973 or Fredbear family diner was made in 1983, same with Freddy fazbear pizza and Fazbear Entertainment was made in 1983. or Fredbear family diner was made in 1983, same year as freddy fazbear pizza was made in 1983 as Fazbear Entertainment was made in 1983
@@broschannel3982freddy's was opened in 1983 before the events of fnaf 4, and at least at the same time from the story "the mimic", bit fredbears was closed after fnaf 4, but freddy's still opened (if you think that the mci was in 83 or 85)
There's a problem: From my understanding, (and feel free to correct me) there aren't any spring locks in the mouth. If I remember correctly the mouth has hydraulics or something. Idk. I'm not an engineer so yeah 😂
Glitchtrao HIMSELF doesn’t exist outside the VR game. The suit he’s based on is separate. And again, the fredbear posters literally show us that the suit existed
yes, and Freddy can definitely be a nickname for Fredbear. Hell, Freddy's original name was actually Freddy Bear, a reference to teddy bear and very similar to the name Fredbear that we got later on
@@ImpulseEvan37 Maybe, hopefully it'll be explained in Help Wanted 2 or even the FNaF movie, I can't believe they're nearly here 👀 Also, I like the reference to when Phone Guy mentions them being around for 20 years, however, he says the animatronics were "forced to sing those same stupid songs for twenty years", so it'd make sense that he's referring to the full animatronic, and not just the suit, especially since it's the mechanical parts of the Classics which are "irritable at night" due to being "forced to sing those same stupid songs for twenty years", and never getting cleaned during that time. Not to mention there's a Classic Fredbear animatronic, which has to predate the Endo 02-type Fredbear who caused the "Bite of '83", leading to the Fredbear character to become abandoned. And once the Classics are brought back and repaired after the Endo 02's are scrapped, the original Fredbear (along with Foxy), are the only two left in a state of disrepair, with Fredbear missing an eye and an ear.
@@ImpulseEvan37 I mean, them previously being costumes before being used for the animatronics in 1973 would still make sense with this. also, if the Classics' fur was made from the original suits, and Freddy's fur originally belonged to a brown Fredbear suit, could the handprint seen on Freddy's face originate from when they were just a costume pre-1973? Just food for thought. (Also, if Classic Fredbear/Yellowbear was just a ghost, before the movie showed it's a physical animatronic, it'd explain why they are just Classic Freddy but yellow, as Classic Freddy was originally Fredbear... who knows)
i also had that handprint idea, but i didn't know whether i should actually mention it in the video because i dont know if its very strong, but its entirely possible
“The original animatronics featured spring lock suits that had to be hand cranked to allow them to be worn safely by employees." "The first location of the Freddy's franchise was actually Fredbear's Family Diner.” Both check out. So i fail to see the problem
![일상 속 기분 좋음 [Proto disco meme]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DwmEIaZ7XGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how it's 2023 and we're still talking about the origins of the timeline lol
Its cause its not had a game about it, and of course the beginning being one of the most important parts of any story, means that if the writers keep not showing us what happened, they get way more theorizing from the community than if they didnt show, say, the middle of the story.
@@jc_art_We know Fredbear's as the start of everything, but idk ngl, the carnival costumes look even OLDER.
@@jc_art_
I personally don’t think it doesn’t need a game.
I feel the specifics in the origin isn’t important for the overall story.
We know Henry and William (aka, Aubergine Man) were co-owners of Faz Ent Inc.
FredBear’s was one of the original restaurants for them.
Just going off by games 1-7, not counting games not made by Scott, pretty much after 7.
@@FredbonFilms
I don’t think it matters for games 1-7.
@@azimuddin1890This is fair but.. it would be pretty cool to see how things were before it all went to shit.
I personally would love a Fredbears game but.. I do wonder how it would work out ngl. Especially since I guess it’s be kinda to have an origins game after 1-6 concluded lol. But I’d enjoy it and it can just be it’s own thing. It highly depends how they go about it though.
Maybe it’d be better as an animated series ngl. 🤔
Henry strikes me as the kinda guy to keep the original fredbears stuffed and turned into his coffee table, while Afton would see this as an insult and then proceed to retrofit it's corpse with machinery and endopieces
Desolate Hope Coffee ☕
The cutout was more likely for the "carnival" that was hinted at in some unused level geometry for the cave escape. But this is just as intriguing since it ties back to that horrific poster in the alley in FFPS with the scary clown and real live bear performer. So it wasn't the diner that existed in the 70s, but a carnival starring a real live trained bear named Fredbear that was totally safe and didn't harm anyone nope no sir. You know, two of the mascot costumes in mimic's room were a lion and an elephant, both being typical circus animals. I'm seeing a pattern here, that the mascot costumes were for this carnival and Grimic was a part of that. Yeah I'm just gonna keep calling it Grimic, fight me.
I REALLY like this theory but there is one major problem with it. And it's the fact that the Spring Bonnie character was named after the springlock suits. Meaning the suits have to have been created before Spring Bonnie was given his name. The only workaround I can think of is that Spring Bonnie was originally just named "Bonnie."
well yeah, i mean Fredbear was also originally just named Freddy, so Springbonnie originally being named Bonnie makes perfect sense
@@ImpulseEvan37 Freddy Bear moment
@@ImpulseEvan37Actually the full name of Freddy is Freddy Fazbear. It's just people prefers to use his first word.
I would freaking LOVE a fredbears family diner game.
God I hope they do make a Fredbears, it would be great because there's so much still in the past in terms of stories to be told.
It would probably suck because steel wool can't seem to make a good/scary fnaf game
Fredbear is just one room btw
In Fnaf 4 and FFPS that building you use is all of Fredbear’s
Great theory! Curious on one point.
The supply closet bonnie looks different to the spring bonnie we see in the fnaf4 purple guy easter egg. The easter egg spring bonnie more closely resembles the fruity maze spring bonnie. This would mean the spring bonnie at fredbears and freddys were the same or similar, but they were different to the original glitchtrap bonnie. I think this makes phone guy’s line inaccurate still, since that original bonnie would have been discontinued.
or it could just be that the different angle in fnaf 4 makes it look different. If the Springbonnie head in the supply closet at fredbears wasn't the same as the Springbonnie design FOR Fredbear's that doesn't make sense, especially considering the Fredbear in the closet looks the same. So yeah, probably just the angle where its facing it
@@ImpulseEvan37 fair point on the angle! imo it still looks too different, but it is also pixel graphics so 🤷♂️
I have heard theories in the past that the supply closet head was some sort of prototype for spring bonnie, so I was kinda going off that. I think that still works with the idea of glitchtrap being the og bonnie, and at some point they changed the design after springlocks were introduced.
I actually really like this theory. It's fresh and actually looks at different parts of the fnaf timeline that aren't usually covered. Good job!
Good mini theory! It could be very likely that they used costumes before animatronics was an opinion for the restaurant. I had actually been looking into what the earliest chuck-e-cheese animatronic were, just to see if there was anything close to the 70s and they are 1978 but feels more close to 80s then 70s... But found out Disney has had them since 1963, so we could probably still see something if they go this route, which I really hope!
Their might be a William primarily owned location before he joined up with Henry and he likely used normal mascot suits like Game Theory's ultimate timeline says, the stuff after part 2 is questionable
Bro SOMEBODY finally said what I WAS THINKING and put it into words. YES. Stage 01 is Golden Freddy, and FNAF 4 Fredbear is springlock Fredbear.
Quick question, if you make a prequel Fnaf game which time would you put it in? I would want one that’s set during the MCI (maybe you could play as the MC and it can go into there personality and how they were killed)
i've been saying this for the last 15 years!! i knew this was the case before scott even conceptualized fnaf actually.
No you didn't
@@broschannel3982yes huh
one question how???
How could you have known of this before Scott even made the story?
Scott didn't even know The first five nights at Freddy's game was intended to be his last game If it wasn't successful, he would have quit game development
Of course we all know how it played out.
During the time of the first game. I find it inconceivable that he would make the idea of the spring lock suits and Fred bear's family Diner
So I really don't believe you. Why am I wasting my time making this comment?
It was literally a joke 💀💀💀
@@ImpulseEvan37 oh ok
THANK YOU.
I am REALLY happy to see someone else say this.
The first suits were hand sewn. Then a second series was created,the springlocks which also included the fun times from FNAF 4 sister location. Then the next generation was after the springlocks were discontinued which included the classics from FNAF1.
there's at least 2 locations to visit: The carnival (most likely Fredbear singing show and second location of Sister's location) and Fredbear's family dinner (that we already saw back in Ruin with the old costumes) Also, in the closet room where the oldest costumes are i noticed at least 7 (or 6) closets but the point is i think these are the OG costumes but i'm not sure if those belongs to Bonnie (because that would be William's) Freddy and Foxy, Chica couldn't be part of the group because that was Henry's creation or other creations or basically spare costumes from the others since Mimic took the rest in order to make its own
I would be intrigued to see how they would make such a small area that is fredbears family diner into a game
honestly that's kinda what i've been thinking like everyone overlooking that the fnaf 1 animatronics were around in the 70's and not created in the 80's
Thats when fnaf lore was not planned all along, now he's refering to fredbear's
@@Wizardjones69 i know that but i don't think it would be refering to fredbear's considering he was directly talking about the fnaf 1 animatronics
While I don't dislike going back in time because that would provide answers, and it doesn't put us god knows how many years into the future now... this brings a new set of issues.
Throwing the plot another decade into the past with Henry and William still being owner/founding figures of the franchise keeps making them older. A small diner that lasted a couple years is one thing, but another 10 years? Specially now that some people are suggesting that Henry didn't die in FNAF 6 and might still be around.
I don't like how spring-lock suits are portrayed as something that slowly unlocks as that make no sense when compared to how spring-locks work in real life. A good example of a real life spring-lock would be the retractable pen or 'click pen' that you (probably) have, your click pen can't slowly unlock and have the tip slowly come back in? No, (not with out some outside force any way) clicking the pen or if it the pen goes through it's own spring-lock failure the tip will almost instantly retract or extend.
literally not the same thing at all
@@ImpulseEvan37 That is true, I'll take the L on that one.
But STAGE-01 Fredbear is called "GFreddy" in the files, probably short for Golden Freddy
I’ve been waiting for this theory for ages! First view by the way.
Another slamdunk from Evan, very cool!
this sounds like what MatPat said in the timeline video
Hey impulse I have something to share there’s a game in ruin called fredbears nomnombits it uses a 8 bit fredbear from fnaf 4 it makes me think fnaf 4s mini game is apart of “ fazbeara false “ past
New headcanon accepted
I brought this up a long time ago, but the timeline in "The Mimic" puts that story at 1979 the latest. If you don't treat Edwin as a parallel to Henry, then Freadbears was already established by the original owners and Edwin was outfitting the new "Friends" of "Fredbear and Friends", presumably based on designs. This includes some other mascots. It's been inferred that only Henry could make the springlocks, but making an Endo is not exclusive. Freddy Fazbear's Pizza is established in1983 (known by the coin). Because of a "resolved" date of 2035 (by Fuhnaff), Edwin's age in "The Storyteller" was used to reverse engineer the dates, but the dates are laid out in "The Mimic". This helps strengthen your theory. Good vid.
While I appreciate you trying to provide extra evidence for the theory, this simply isn't true. Nothing about the Mimic story places it in the 70s at all. In fact, it absolutely CANNOT be in the 70s because it mentions the 70s being in the past. Nothing definitively implies Security Breach is in 2035 either, and that year doesn't work at all with the Mimic timeline as the storyteller is soon after the pizzaplex opens and takes place 40 years after the mimic. If The Mimic took place any earlier than 1984, that wouldn't work as fnaf 6 is in 2023 and the pizzaplex obviously opens after fnaf 6. The only year prior to 2035 that matches security Breach's calendar is 2029, and since the faz life magazines are quarterly and theres 19 of them, the pizzaplex would've opened just under 5 years before security breach placing the opening in 2024, which is after fnaf 6 and allows the mimic to be in 1984, where Edwin is likely just building the animatronics for some of the many Freddy Fazbear's Pizza Locations
@@ImpulseEvan37 Respectfully, it may very well be true. There are plenty of points to cross reference in the Mimic story. For examply, he started his company in the early 70s and purchased the Lace Factory to house his new business. At the same time, he and his wife acquired the Queen Anne Mansion. This means they bought it in the early 70s as well and this story only takes place 5 years after they purchased the building, because when they moved in, Fiona was already pregnant. Furthermore, he already had a job he loved and a wife before he had a son. During this story it states that for the past year and a half, Edwin has worked for Fazbear Entertainment because his business was short lived and failed due to him having to raise David by himself. I encourage you to go through it once more.
It isn't specified that the lace factory was purchased right when Edwin started his business. You're able to start a business while you're still a minor (hell, before summer break my business teacher encouraged us to start our own lol) and its said that Edwin was into technical stuff all the way back in his childhood. It is entirely possible that he started the business as a teenager but that it hadn't gotten successful until the vacuum when he was in college and that was when he bought the factory. The only relation the purchasing of the lace factory has to the TIME the business started is that it was said that it was to house his new business, but technically "new" doesn't have to mean it was started just then. While the business started when he was a lot younger, it's likely that since it only started getting successful in his college days that that was when he bought the factory. If this ISN'T the case, then the timeline just doesn't add up at all, as whether tales is in the games timeline or not, FNaF 6's events still happened since the pizza place is under the pizzaplex, and fnaf 6 was in 2023, so if the pizzaplex opened in 2019, then the timeline is fractured
@@ImpulseEvan37 it’s specified that he bought the factory to “house his new business” so unless “new” spans over the course of long periods of time, I think it infers that it was right when he started it. He used the money he had made during college thanks to the robot vacuum cleaner. It’s also not possible that he started his business as a teenager as it is also specified that he “started his business right out of school.” (Pg 148) I understand what you’re saying about the pizzaplex, but going by the latest information, those dates get drawn into questioning anyway.
@@ImpulseEvan37what if FNAF 3 is in 2015 and 6 in 2017🤔
I like the theory only thing wich doesnt make sense is that Afton "repaired" himself. If he really repaired himself than he would have both arms dont you think? I mean it would explain the diffrent look but it wouldnt make much sense. I would be intrested to hear why Scott made Scraptrap look the way that he did instead of using springtrap and but the same damage on him that he put on scraptrap( missing arm, uper head showing etc.)
I think its just a flawed redsign
Wait why are people going to solve the past fredbears is it already solved ?
It was confirmed that glitchtrap existe only in the digitale world so it is like afton's oc
that was never confirmed lol, and security breach's fredbear poster literally show hes a real character
Agreed for the most part.
@@ImpulseEvan37 man just look at the ecycolpidia again man
Ah yes, the encyclopedia “implying it” is better evidence than blatant confirmation of the contrary. Sure.
@@ImpulseEvan37
Doesnt it say it’s a digital only character.
Perhaps SpringBonnieMan suit (I’m calling it that, let’s not focus on it) is a digital suit based off of it, not that it actually exist.
Hi you remember what phone guy in Fnaf 1 said about 20 years and I did candour to
1973+20= 1993
or 1983+20=2003.
Fredbear family diner was made in 1973 or Fredbear family diner was made in 1983, same with Freddy fazbear pizza and Fazbear Entertainment was made in 1983.
or Fredbear family diner was made in 1983, same year as freddy fazbear pizza was made in 1983 as Fazbear Entertainment was made in 1983
What implies fredbear's family diner opened in the same year as Freddy's?
@@broschannel3982freddy's was opened in 1983 before the events of fnaf 4, and at least at the same time from the story "the mimic", bit fredbears was closed after fnaf 4, but freddy's still opened (if you think that the mci was in 83 or 85)
There's a problem:
From my understanding, (and feel free to correct me) there aren't any spring locks in the mouth. If I remember correctly the mouth has hydraulics or something. Idk. I'm not an engineer so yeah 😂
I Dont believe its specified whether or not there are. Either way that's not really the main point of the theory, just a side note
@@ImpulseEvan37 true. I just thought I'd mention that. It's otherwise a pretty nice theory. I always enjoy listening to you talk.
What about fredbear's singing show?
what if help wanted 2 is the fredbears game
yes but we also know glitchtraps suit dosent exist out of the vr game
No we don’t lmao, the fredbear posters literally slow that it does and there’s nothing that says it doesn’t.
@@ImpulseEvan37 i know its bad to use but the fnaf encyclopedia literally says it dosent
Glitchtrao HIMSELF doesn’t exist outside the VR game. The suit he’s based on is separate. And again, the fredbear posters literally show us that the suit existed
@@ImpulseEvan37 we all have our own interations
Feels illegal to be this early
ikr
Hello, 911? This comment right here. ☠️
@@Takejiro24 💀
Great theory!
4:09
He's referred to as Freddy in Security Breach and RUIN, and Freddy isn't Fredbear, soo-
yes, and Freddy can definitely be a nickname for Fredbear. Hell, Freddy's original name was actually Freddy Bear, a reference to teddy bear and very similar to the name Fredbear that we got later on
@@ImpulseEvan37 Maybe, hopefully it'll be explained in Help Wanted 2 or even the FNaF movie, I can't believe they're nearly here 👀
Also, I like the reference to when Phone Guy mentions them being around for 20 years,
however, he says the animatronics were "forced to sing those same stupid songs for twenty years", so it'd make sense that he's referring to the full animatronic, and not just the suit,
especially since it's the mechanical parts of the Classics which are "irritable at night" due to being "forced to sing those same stupid songs for twenty years", and never getting cleaned during that time.
Not to mention there's a Classic Fredbear animatronic, which has to predate the Endo 02-type Fredbear who caused the "Bite of '83", leading to the Fredbear character to become abandoned.
And once the Classics are brought back and repaired after the Endo 02's are scrapped,
the original Fredbear (along with Foxy), are the only two left in a state of disrepair, with Fredbear missing an eye and an ear.
i agree it would make more sense if he was talking about the animatronics, but the costumes thing does work too and makes sense
@@ImpulseEvan37 I mean, them previously being costumes before being used for the animatronics in 1973 would still make sense with this.
also, if the Classics' fur was made from the original suits, and Freddy's fur originally belonged to a brown Fredbear suit,
could the handprint seen on Freddy's face originate from when they were just a costume pre-1973?
Just food for thought.
(Also, if Classic Fredbear/Yellowbear was just a ghost, before the movie showed it's a physical animatronic, it'd explain why they are just Classic Freddy but yellow, as Classic Freddy was originally Fredbear... who knows)
i also had that handprint idea, but i didn't know whether i should actually mention it in the video because i dont know if its very strong, but its entirely possible
1979*
5th, lol
6th, but almost the same.
IMO, I think the springlock failure occurred at CBPW.
SL wasn't planned by the time FNAF 3 released
third
4th-
good theory, one problem, the fnaf ar faz-facts
“The original animatronics featured spring lock suits that had to be hand cranked to allow them to be worn safely by employees."
"The first location of the Freddy's franchise was actually Fredbear's Family Diner.”
Both check out. So i fail to see the problem
@@ImpulseEvan37 no, the faz facts say that the springlocks were the first animatronics and your theory implies that there were regular animatronics
No, there were NO animatronics UNTIL the springlocks. The costumes BECAME animatronics a lot later on, but they weren’t actual animatronics
oh, ok@@ImpulseEvan37