THE DEFENDANT SCRAM HIS OWN BROTHER OUT OF HIS RENT MONEY. SOMETIMES YOU JUST CAN'T TRUST SOME FAMILY MEMBERS ESPECIALLY WHEN DEALING WITH MONEY. THE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE ASHAME OF HIMSELF. 😮😮😮
There is something really confusing about this case if he doesn’t have a bank account then how does he pay for his phone bill because they require a credit card to pay for it or a bank account transfer
Her: "You're the fraud, and I'm never eating at your food truck again." Me: You're sure about that? Afterall, it is the only place you can eat on the way to your job.
What is weird is that normally you have to pay it back even if he agreed you not suppose to just help yourself so i think by normal law her judgment was wrong
She lying cause if you get sick once you won't go back
THE DEFENDANT SCRAM HIS OWN BROTHER OUT OF HIS RENT MONEY. SOMETIMES YOU JUST CAN'T TRUST SOME FAMILY MEMBERS ESPECIALLY WHEN DEALING WITH MONEY. THE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE ASHAME OF HIMSELF. 😮😮😮
Not really there are ways to do that without a bank account.
Case Two:
The plaintiff already won a $9,000 judgement…
WHO CARES IF YOU EAT FROM HIS TACO TRUCK AGAIN!???
There is something really confusing about this case if he doesn’t have a bank account then how does he pay for his phone bill because they require a credit card to pay for it or a bank account transfer
He probably gets another person to pay for it
2nd Case Big Gurl Got Issues ain’t no Way 😂🤣
'tis the only food truck on the way to work! . . .HOPE the $9000 defamation judgment was worth it . . . MADAME.
THE DEFENDANT MAKES NO SENSE!!!😮😮😮 KEPT GOING TO A FOOD TRUCK THAT SHE CLAIMS MADE HER SICK 😫 🤒
Call the head doctor cray cray all the wayyyy 🙃😚😏
Her: "You're the fraud, and I'm never eating at your food truck again."
Me: You're sure about that? Afterall, it is the only place you can eat on the way to your job.
😂
Horrible ruling on the first case.
1st case the defendant is hella Wrong 🤦🏽
What is weird is that normally you have to pay it back even if he agreed you not suppose to just help yourself so i think by normal law her judgment was wrong
She said you both owe each other so dismissed....the debt was cancelled out
I believe the plaintiff lol